Search

Rationale and Objectives: To determine independent contribution of each prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) sequence to cancer detection when read in isolation., Materials and Methods: Prostate mpMRI at 3-Tesla with endorectal coil from 45 patients (n = 30 prostatectomy cases, n = 15 controls with negative magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or biopsy) were retrospectively interpreted. Sequences (T2-weighted [T2W] MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], and dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] MRI; N = 135) were separately distributed to three radiologists at different institutions. Readers evaluated each sequence blinded to other mpMRI sequences. Findings were correlated to whole-mount pathology. Cancer detection sensitivity, positive predictive value for whole prostate (WP), transition zone, and peripheral zone were evaluated per sequence by reader, with reader concordance measured by index of specific agreement. Cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for combinations of independently read sequences., Results: 44 patients were evaluable (cases median prostate-specific antigen 6.83 [ range 1.95-51.13] ng/mL, age 62 [45-71] years; controls prostate-specific antigen 6.85 [2.4-10.87] ng/mL, age 65.5 [47-71] years). Readers had highest sensitivity on DWI (59%) vs T2W MRI (48%) and DCE (23%) in WP. DWI-only positivity (DWI+/T2W-/DCE-) achieved highest CDR in WP (38%), compared to T2W-only (CDR 24%) and DCE-only (CDR 8%). DWI+/T2W+/DCE- achieved CDR 80%, an added benefit of 56.4% from T2W-only and of 42% from DWI-only (P < .0001). All three sequences interpreted independently positive gave highest CDR of 90%. Reader agreement was moderate (index of specific agreement: T2W = 54%, DWI = 58%, DCE = 33%)., Conclusions: When prostate mpMRI sequences are interpreted independently by multiple observers, DWI achieves highest sensitivity and CDR in transition zone and peripheral zone. T2W and DCE MRI both add value to detection; mpMRI achieves highest detection sensitivity when all three mpMRI sequences are positive., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of a head-to-head comparison between the performance of biparametric MRI (bpMRI; only T2-weighted imaging and DWI) and that of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI; T2-weighted imaging, DWI, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer., Materials and Methods: The PubMed and Embase databases were searched up to November 11, 2017. The search included diagnostic test accuracy studies that compared bpMRI and mpMRI for prostate cancer diagnosis with histopathologic findings from biopsy or radical prostatectomy as the reference standard. Methodologic quality was evaluated with the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled by means of bivariate and hierarchic summary ROC (HSROC) modeling and graphically presented with HSROC plots. Meta-regression analysis and multiple subgroup analyses were used to compare the diagnostic performances of bpMRI and mpMRI., Results: Twenty studies (2142 patients) were included. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.66-0.81) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86-0.93) for bpMRI and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69-0.82) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93) for mpMRI. MRI protocol (bpMRI vs mpMRI) was not a significant factor in heterogeneity (p = 0.83). In 26 subgroups evaluated on the basis of stratification to clinicopathologic, study, and MRI characteristics, MRI protocol (bpMRI vs mpMRI) was not a significant factor in heterogeneity in any subgroup (p = 0.25-0.97)., Conclusion: A head-to-head comparison showed that the performance of bpMRI was similar to that of mpMRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Consistent results were found in multiple subgroup analyses.

While many institutions perform MRI during the work-up of urinary bladder cancer, others use MRI rarely if at all, possibly due to a variation in the reported staging accuracy and unfamiliarity with the potential benefits of performing MRI. Through increased application of functional imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging, there has been a resurgence of interest regarding evaluation of bladder cancer with MRI. Several recent meta-analyses have shown that MRI is accurate at differentiating between ≤T1 and T2 disease (with pooled sensitivity/specificity of ∼90/80%) and differentiating between T2 and ≥T3 disease. DWI and DCE, in combination with high-resolution T 2 -weighted images, improves detection and possibly local staging accuracy of bladder cancer. High b value echo-planar DWI is particularly valuable for tumor detection. Zoomed field of view and segmented readout DWI techniques improve image quality by reducing susceptibility artifact, while methods to extract calculated high b value images save time and improve the contrast-to-noise ratio. DCE traditionally required imaging of the pelvis with high temporal but lower spatial resolution; however, advances in parallel and keyhole imaging techniques can preserve spatial resolution. The use of compressed sensing reconstruction may improve utilization of DCE of the bladder, especially when imaging the abdomen simultaneously, as in MR urography. Quantitative imaging analysis of bladder cancer using pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE, apparent diffusion coefficient values, and texture analysis may enable radiomic assessment of bladder cancer grade and stage., Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;48:882-896., (© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of simultaneous multislice diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI-SMS) with that of standard DWI (DWI-STD) in whole-body 3-T PET/MRI examination protocols in oncological patients., Methods: In a phantom study, we evaluated the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC) from the two techniques. In ten volunteers, we assessed ADC values in different organs. In 20 oncological patients, we evaluated subjective image quality (Likert scale, 5 indicating excellent) and artefacts in different body regions. We also rated the conspicuity and acquired the ADC values of PET-positive tumorous lesions., Results: The scan time for the whole-body DWI-SMS examinations was 40% shorter than the scan time for the DWI-STD examinations (84 s vs. 140 s per table position). The phantom and volunteer studies showed lower ADC values from DWI-SMS in the liver and muscle (psoas muscle 1.4 vs. 1.3). In patients, DWI-SMS provided poorer subjective image quality in the thoracoabdominal region (3.0 vs. 3.8, p = 0.02) and overall more artefacts (138 vs. 105). No significant differences regarding conspicuity and ADC values of lesions were found., Conclusions: DWI-SMS seems to provide reliable conspicuity and ADC values of tumorous lesions similar to those provided by DWI-STD. Therefore, although providing poorer image quality in certain regions, DWI-SMS can clearly reduce PET/MRI scan times in oncological patients., Key Points: • DWI-SMS can reduce PET/MRI scan times in oncological patients. • DWI-SMS provides reliable ADC values and good lesion conspicuity similar to those provided by DWI-STD. • DWI-SMS may provide poorer image quality in regions with low signal.

Multiparametric MR imaging is widely embraced for the diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of prostate cancer. However, normal anatomic structures and many benign entities have overlapping imaging features with prostate cancer. Although some of these entities require biopsy and histopathologic diagnosis, some have characteristic imaging features that are suggestive of their diagnosis. Knowledge of these pitfalls is important in establishing a correct diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary biopsies, as these entities are encountered routinely in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Breast and whole-body PET/MR imaging is being used to detect local and metastatic disease and is being investigated for potential imaging biomarkers, which may eventually help personalize treatments and prognoses. This article provides an overview of breast and whole-body PET/MR exam techniques, summarizes PET and MR breast imaging for lesion detection, outlines investigations into multi-parametric breast PET/MR, looks at breast PET/MR in the setting of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, and reviews the pros and cons of whole-body PET/MR in the setting of metastatic or suspected metastatic breast cancer., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Here we explore the raw parameter space in air in bimodal atomic force microscopy (AFM) in order to enhance resolution, provide multiparameter maps, and produce suitable transformations that lead to physically intuitive maps general enough to be recognized by the broader community, i.e., stiffness, Hamaker constant, and adhesion force. We further consider model free transforms to enhance the raw parameter space in the form of alternative and more intelligible contrast maps. We employ highly oriented pyrolytic graphite, calcite, polypropylene, and dsDNA on mica to demonstrate a systematic form of parameter expansion. The proposed methodology to enhance and interpret a larger parameter space introduces a methodology to tractable multidimensional AFM from raw bimodal AFM maps.

Modern MR imaging protocols can yield both anatomic and functional information for the assessment of hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies. Diffusion-weighted imaging is fully integrated into state-of-the-art protocols for tumor detection, characterization, and therapy monitoring. Hepatobiliary contrast agents have gained ground in the evaluation of focal liver lesions during the last years. Perfusion MR imaging is expected to have a central role for monitoring therapy in body tumors treated with antivascular drugs. Approaches such as Magnetic resonance (MR) elastography and (1)H-MR spectroscopy are still confined to research centers, but with the potential to grow in a short time frame., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The authors discuss eight areas of quantitative MR imaging that are currently used (RECIST, DCE-MR imaging, DSC-MR imaging, diffusion MR imaging) in clinical trials or emerging (CEST, elastography, hyperpolarized MR imaging, multiparameter MR imaging) as promising techniques in diagnosing cancer and assessing or predicting response of cancer to therapy. Illustrative applications of the techniques in the clinical setting are summarized before describing the current limitations of the methods., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Patients with an enlarged prostate and suspicion of prostate cancer pose a diagnostic dilemma. The prostate cancer detection rate of systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is between 30% and 40%. For prostates greater than 40 cc this decreases to 30% or less. Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy has shown superior prostate cancer detection rates. We defined the detection rate of magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy in men with an enlarged prostate gland., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging followed by magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy at our institution. Whole prostate volumes were calculated using magnetic resonance imaging reconstructions. Detection rates were analyzed with respect to age, prostate specific antigen and whole prostate volumes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess these parameters as independent predictors of prostate cancer detection., Results: We analyzed 649 patients with a mean±SD age of 61.8±7.9 years and a median prostate specific antigen of 6.65 ng/ml (IQR 4.35-11.0). Mean whole prostate volume was 58.7±34.3 cc. The overall detection rate of the magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion platform was 55%. For prostates less than 40 cc the detection rate was 71.1% compared to 57.5%, 46.9%, 46.9% 33.3%, 36.4% and 30.4% for glands 40 to 54.9, 55 to 69.9, 70 to 84.9, 85 to 99.9, 100 to 114.9 and 115 cc or greater, respectively (p<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression showed a significant inverse association of magnetic resonance imaging volume with prostate cancer detection, controlling for age and prostate specific antigen., Conclusions: Transrectal ultrasound guided and fusion biopsy cancer detection rates decreased with increasing prostate volume. However, magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy had a higher prostate cancer detection rate compared to that of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy in the literature. Magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy represents a promising solution for patients with suspicion of prostate cancer and an enlarged prostate., (Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Diagnosis and precise risk stratification of prostate cancer is essential for individualized treatment decisions. Magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion has shown encouraging results for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer. We critically evaluated magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy in routine clinical practice., Materials and Methods: Included in this prospective study were 347 consecutive patients with findings suspicious for prostate cancer. Median age was 65 years (range 42 to 84) and mean prostate specific antigen was 9.85 ng/ml (range 0.5 to 104). Of the men 49% previously underwent transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies, which were negative, and 51% underwent primary biopsy. In all patients 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was done. Systematic stereotactic prostate biopsies plus magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies were performed in those with abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging. Imaging data and biopsy results were analyzed. A self-designed questionnaire was sent to all men on further clinical history and biopsy adverse effects., Results: Of 347 patients biopsy samples of 200 (58%) showed prostate cancer and 73.5% of biopsy proven prostate cancer were clinically relevant according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria. On multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging 104 men had findings highly suspicious for prostate cancer. The tumor detection rate was 82.6% (86 of 104 men) with a Gleason score of 7 or greater in 72%. Overall targeted cores detected significantly more cancer than systematic biopsies (30% vs 8.2%). Of 94 patients without cancer suspicious lesions on magnetic resonance imaging 11 (11.7%) were diagnosed with intermediate risk disease. Regarding adverse effects, 152 of 300 patients (50.6%) reported mild hematuria, 26% had temporary erectile dysfunction and 2.6% needed short-term catheterization after biopsy. Nonseptic febrile urinary tract infections developed in 3 patients (1%)., Conclusions: Magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy provides high detection of clinically significant tumors. Since multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging still has some limitations, systematic biopsies should currently not be omitted. The morbidity of the transperineal saturation approach is reasonable and mainly self-limiting., (Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has now become the most common surgical treatment option for prostate cancer (CaP). Clinicopathologic data (i.e., biopsy, digital rectal exam, prostate specific antigen level) and patient-specific factors (e.g., age, erectile function, co-morbidities) are the primary sources of information that urologists use for counseling and treatment decision making. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has evolved along a similar temporal arc to RARP, with increased utilization and precision over the past decade. MRI prior to RARP provides multifaceted adjunctive information, including enhancement of locoregional staging, delineation of spatial anatomic information, and identification of aberrant anatomy, all of which aid in patient treatment counseling and operative planning. This article is designed for urologic surgeons who perform RARP, with the aim of providing a review of prostate MRI imaging and highlighting findings which may specifically alter the operation., Methods and Materials: A review of the literature was performed, focusing on the most recent publications., Results: MRI imaging of the prostate has become increasing accurate for the identification, localization, and characterization of CaP lesions. In addition to tumor-specific information, a number of intra- and extra-prostatic findings are consistently identified on MRI which may impact RARP., Conclusions: MRI provides important information which may alter RARP., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)