Search

Background Many clinical trials supporting new drug applications underrepresent minority patients. Trials conducted by the National Cancer Institute’s National Clinical Trial’s Network (NCTN) have greater outreach to community sites, potentially allowing better representation. We compared the representation of Black patients in pharmaceutical company–sponsored cancer clinical trials with NCTN trials and with the US cancer population. Methods We established a large cohort of study publications representing the results of trials that supported new US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals from 2008 to 2018. NCTN trial data were from the SWOG Cancer Research Network. US cancer population rates were estimated using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results survey data. We compared the proportion of Black patients by enrollment year for each cancer type and overall. Tests of proportions were used. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results A total 358 trials (pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials, 85; SWOG trials, 273) comprised of 93 825 patients (pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials, 46 313; SWOG trials, 47 512) for 15 cancer types were analyzed. Overall, the proportion of Black patients was 2.9% for pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials, 9.0% for SWOG trials, and 12.1% for the US cancer population (P Conclusions The poor representation of Black patients in pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials supporting new drug applications could result in the use of new drugs with little data about efficacy or side effects in this key population. Moreover, because pharmaceutical company–sponsored trials test the newest available therapies, limited access to these trials represents a disparity in access to potential breakthrough therapies.

Ampullary adenocarcinoma is a rare gastrointestinal cancer in which WNT signalling dysregulation has been previously reported. Secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP1) is one of the extracellular ligands of WNT signalling. We performed bioinformatics analyses of SFRP1 expression in human cancer. Microarray analysis of SFRP1 in periampullary adenocarcinoma was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus GSE39409 dataset. SFRP1 expression in ampullary adenocarcinoma was detected by immunohistochemistry staining and correlated with patients’ clinical outcomes. Our results showed that SFRP1 expression had different clinical applications in all types of human cancer. No detected alteration of SFPR1 gene and SFRP1 expression in ampullary adenocarcinoma was lower than that in other periampullary adenocarcinomas. However, high expression levels of SFRP1 protein were correlated with cancer recurrence, peritoneal carcinomatosis and poor patient prognosis. Gene set enrichment analysis showed downregulation of multiple WNT-related genes in primary culture cells from ampullary adenocarcinoma, but SFRP1 expression was increased. We found an interaction between WNT, bone morphogenetic protein and hedgehog signalling with SFRP1. Furthermore, a high expression of SFRP1 predicted poor prognosis for ampullary adenocarcinoma patients. Because it is a multifunctional protein, SFRP1 targeting serves as a potential therapy for ampullary adenocarcinoma patients.

Background Although recent advances in immunotherapy have transformed the treatment landscape for many anatomically defined cancers, these therapies are currently not approved for patients diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Molecular cancer classification using gene expression profiling (GEP) assays has the potential to identify tumor type and putative primary cancers and thereby may allow consideration of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy options for a subset of patients with CUP. Herein, we evaluated and characterized the ability of a 92‐gene assay (CancerTYPE ID) to provide a molecular diagnosis and identify putative tumor types that are known to be sensitive to ICI therapies in patients with CUP or uncertain diagnosis. Findings A total of 24,426 cases from a large‐scale research database of 92‐gene assay clinical cases were classified, of which 9,350 (38%) were predicted to have an ICI‐eligible tumor type. All ICIs with approved indications as of March 2020 were included in the analysis. Non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most frequent molecular diagnosis and accounted for 33% of the ICI‐eligible tumor types identified and 13% of the overall reportable results. In addition to NSCLC, the assay also frequently identified urothelial carcinomas, gastric cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The distributions of identified tumor types with indications for ICI therapy were similar across age and gender. Conclusions Results suggest that molecular profiling with the 92‐gene assay identifies a subset of ICI‐eligible putative primary cancers in patients with CUP. We propose a treatment strategy based on available tests, including clinicopathologic features, GEP, and ICI biomarkers of response., Regulatory approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is restricted to anatomically defined cancers with a known primary. This article reports cases submitted for 92‐gene assay testing with an unknown or uncertain diagnosis for which the subsequent post‐test report included a tumor type linked to an FDA‐approved ICI therapy, with the goal of identifying characteristics of cancers of unknown primary tumors that might benefit from immunotherapy.

We performed two phase I trials of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat combined with either the vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor pazopanib (NCT01339871) or the proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (NCT02042989) in patients with metastatic TP53 mutant solid tumors. Both trials followed a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design allowing for a dose expansion cohort of up to 14 additional patients with a specific tumor type. Patients had to have a confirmed TP53 mutation to be enrolled in NCT02042989. Among patients enrolled in NCT01339871, TP53 mutation status was determined for those for whom tumor specimens were available. The results of NCT01339871 were reported previously. Common treatment-related adverse events in NCT02042989 included anemia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Compared with patients with metastatic TP53 hotspot mutant solid tumors who were treated with ixazomib and vorinostat (n = 59), those who were treated with pazopanib and vorinostat (n = 11) had a significantly higher rate of clinical benefit, defined as stable disease lasting ≥6 months or an objective response (3.4% vs. 45%; p p = 0.002), and a longer median overall survival duration (7.3 months [95% CI, 4.8–9.8] vs. 12.7 months [95% CI, 7.1–18.3]; p = 0.24). Our two phase I trials provide preliminary evidence supporting the use of antiangiogenisis-based therapy in patients with metastatic TP53 mutant solid tumors, especially in those with metastatic sarcoma or metastatic colorectal cancer.

Introduction It has been determined that right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a worse prognosis for overall survival (OS). Currently, there is no consensus on the best systemic regimen for treatment-naive right-sided tumors. We compared the impact of subsequent therapies on OS of patients treated with FOLFOXIRI (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) versus doublet regimens. Patients and Methods Data of patients with treatment-naive right-sided mCRC who received FOLFOXIRI or doublet regimens between January 2001 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. OS was compared between the two groups, and prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results A total of 196 patients were selected; 33 patients received FOLFOXIRI and 163 patients doublet therapy. Median follow-up was 82.3 months. The FOLFOXIRI cohort received fewer subsequent lines of therapies (61% vs. 78%, P = .043). The greater the number of subsequent lines of therapy, the lower the risk of death (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.67 [0.46-0.99], 0.62 [0.45-0.86], and 0.56 [0.39-0.81] for > 1, > 2, and > 3 lines, respectively). By multivariate analysis, metastasectomy and bevacizumab with subsequent lines of therapy were the variables with greatest positive impact on OS (respectively, hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.54 [0.38-0.78] and 0.61 [0.44-0.84]). Conclusion Patients with treatment-naive right-sided mCRC who received front-line FOLFOXIRI had a lower number of subsequent therapies than patients who received doublet regimens. Our findings highlight the relevance of the continuum of care in mCRC, regardless of the first-line regimen, and the importance of careful selection of patients for the FOLFOXIRI regimen.

Background Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are used in conjunction with imaging to monitor response to systemic therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We sought to identify a threshold for CEA change from baseline to predict progressive disease (PD) in mCRC patients receiving first-line therapy. Methods Patients from trials collected in the ARCAD database were included if baseline CEA was at least 10 ng/mL and repeat CEA was available within 14 days of first restaging scan. Optimal cutoffs for CEA change were identified by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Prediction performance of cutoffs was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value. Analyses were conducted by treatment class: chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody, and chemotherapy with anti-EGFR antibody. Results A total of 2643 mCRC patients treated with systemic therapy were included. Median percent change of CEA from baseline to first restaging for patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease (non-PD) and PD was −53.1% and +23.6% for chemotherapy alone (n = 957) and −71.7% and −45.3% for chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody (n = 1355). The optimal area under the curve cutoff for differentiating PD from non-PD on first restaging was −7.5% for chemotherapy alone and −62.0% for chemotherapy with anti-VEGF antibody; chemotherapy alone, adjusted odds ratio = 6.51 (95% CI = 3.31 to 12.83, P Conclusions Change in CEA from baseline to first restaging can accurately predict non-progression and correlates with long-term outcomes in patients receiving systemic chemotherapy.

Background Pancreatic cancer patients are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE); the value of thromboprophylaxis has not been definitively established. Methods This trial randomized cancer patients initiating a new regimen and at high risk for VTE (Khorana score ≥2) to rivaroxaban 10 mg or placebo up to day 180. This analysis examined the subset of pancreatic cancer patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of symptomatic deep‐vein thrombosis (DVT), asymptomatic proximal DVT, any pulmonary embolism, and VTE‐related death. The primary safety endpoint was International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis–defined major bleeding. Results In total, 49/1080 (4.5%) patients enrolled had baseline VTE on screening, with higher rates (24/362 [6.6%]) in pancreatic cancer and they were not randomized. Of 841 randomized patients, 273 (32.5%) had pancreatic cancer; 155/273 (57% in each arm) completed the double‐blind period. The primary endpoint occurred in 13/135 (9.6%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and in 18/138 (13.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34‐1.43; P = .328) in up‐to‐day‐180 period and 5/135 (3.7%) patients receiving rivaroxaban and 14/138 (10.1%) receiving placebo in the intervention period (HR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13‐0.97; P = .034). Major bleeding was similar (2 [1.5%] receiving rivaroxaban and 3 [2.3%] receiving placebo). Correlative biomarker studies demonstrated significant decline in D‐dimer (weeks 8 and 16) in patients randomized to rivaroxaban compared to placebo (P, Thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban is safe and effective in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in ambulatory patients with pancreatic cancer receiving systemic therapy, with a low number needed to treat. Given the favorable risk‐benefit ratio and convenience of the oral route of administration, these findings should inform guideline recommendations for high‐risk patients.

11 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab provided robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as first-line therapy for microsatellite instability-high/DNA mismatch repair deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) (Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up data will be presented. Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks plus low-dose ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: For all 45 patients (median follow-up was 13.8 months), ORR was 60% (95% CI 44.3–74.3). Responses were consistent with the overall population across subgroups including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and mutation status (Table). Seven patients (16%) had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events; 3 (7%) had any grade treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation. Updated response, survival, and safety data after a longer follow-up (median 19.9 months) will be presented. Conclusions: Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated. Evaluated subgroups had responses consistent with the overall population. Nivolumab plus low-dose ipilimumab may represent a new first-line treatment option for patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

A Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO)-hosted expert meeting was held in Japan on 27 October 2019, which comprised experts from the JSCO, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the Taiwan Oncology Society (TOS). The purpose of the meeting was to focus on what we have learnt from both microsatellite instability (MSI)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) biomarkers in predicting the efficacy of anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy, and the neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions in predicting the efficacy of inhibitors of the tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) proteins across a range of solid tumour types. The recent regulatory approvals of the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab and the TRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib, based on specific tumour biomarkers rather than specific tumour type, have heralded a paradigm shift in cancer treatment approaches. The purpose of the meeting was to develop international expert consensus recommendations on the use of such tumour-agnostic treatments in patients with solid tumours. The aim was to generate a reference document for clinical practice, for pharmaceutical companies in the design of clinical trials, for ethics committees in the approval of clinical trial protocols and for regulatory authorities in relation to drug approvals, with a particular emphasis on diagnostic testing and patient selection. Copyright © 2020 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background Antiangiogenics attenuate chemotherapy-related hepatotoxicity and portal hypertension. The potential impact of bevacizumab on the efficacy and safety of partial splenic embolization (PSE) in the management of chemotherapy-induced hypersplenism (CIH) has never been investigated. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective study with gastrointestinal cancer patients who have undergone PSE for the treatment of thrombocytopenia resulting from hypersplenism. Pre- and post-PSE platelet count (PC), the percentage of patients who resumed systemic therapy, and complication rates were compared between patients exposed and not exposed to bevacizumab. Results A total of 110 patients were eligible. Colorectal cancer was the predominant neoplasm (60%), and 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab were the most commonly provided drugs (70%, 65%, and 65% of patients, respectively). After PSE, 80% of patients recovered PC ≥ 100 × 109/L (100K). Systemic therapy was resumed in 81% of patients. Seventy-one patients exposed to bevacizumab had a median PC before PSE of 77.5K and after PSE of 167.0K, with a mean difference of 108K (P Conclusion PSE is a safe and effective procedure in the management of CIH, regardless of the provision of bevacizumab. Splenic infarction rate should be optimized to enhance patient outcomes.

Background Although FOLFIRINOX (5-Fluorouracil + leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin) is now the standard of care for patients (pts) with metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) based on the 2011 study by Conroy et al. which demonstrated improved median overall survival (mOS), pts > 75 yrs old were excluded from this study. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) in this population. Methods We retrospectively analyzed unresectable PC pts, age ≥ 75, treated with mFOLFIRINOX at MD Anderson from 2011 to 2017. Primary outcome was rate of grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity (HT). Results 24 pts were included. Grade 3 or 4 HT occurred in 11 pts 6 pts required hospitalization for any toxicity, and 10 stopped mFOLFIRINOX due to toxicity. The most frequently used starting doses of infusional 5-FU, irinotecan and oxaliplatin were 2400, 150 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. Median PFS was 3.7 months (95% CI: 3.0–5.7) with a median OS of 11.6 months (95% CI: 6.14–15.7). For first line pts, median PFS and OS were 5.1 (95% CI: 2.0–12.8) and 12.2 months (95% CI: 4.8–30.8), respectively. Conclusions In this single-center retrospective analysis of unresectable PC pts age 75 or older given mFOLFIRINOX, toxicities and survival outcomes were similar to those reported in the initial study. These data indicate that the use of modified dosing FOLFIRINOX in advanced PC pts older than 75 appears to maintain similar toxicity and efficacy when compared to younger pts.

Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is rare, and no standard of care exists for metastatic SBA beyond first-line FOLFOX/CAPOX. Later-line therapy has been extrapolated from colorectal cancer (CRC) studies, though SBA is biologically distinct with higher rates microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and intratumoral T-lymphocyte infiltration. We hypothesize that pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, will induce antitumor response. Methods: Previously treated advanced SBA patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg IV q3 weeks until disease progression (PD), toxicity, or to 35 dose maximum. Primary endpoint was confirmed overall response rate (ORR) with secondary survival and safety endpoints. Outcomes were stratified by tumor location, microsatellite stability (MSS) or instability (MSI-H), and PD-L1 level. Findings: 40 patients were treated for median duration of 4 cycles (range 1-35). MSI status was available for 36 patients (90%). All 40 patients are off study treatment due to: PD (75%), death (10%), 35 cycles completed (8%), refusal (3%), and adverse effects (AE, 5%). Three confirmed partial responses (PR) (8%; 95% CI: 2-20) did not meet pre-defined success criteria. Median overall survival (OS) 7 . 1 mo (95% CI: 5 . 1-17 . 1) and median progression free survival (PFS) 2 . 8 mo (95% CI: 2 . 7-4 . 2) were similar across primary tumor sites. One confirmed PR was seen in 32 MSS/MSI-low patients (3%). MSS response correlated with high tumor mutation burden (TMB). Two of four MSI-H patients had a confirmed PR (50%) and remain alive without progression. 25 patients (63%) had grade ≥ 3 AEs, 11 pts (28%) had grade 4/5 AEs. Interpretation: In the largest study of SBA to date, and the first using immunotherapy, pembrolizumab did not achieve the hypothesized response rate; however, we did identify responses in certain biomarker-selected cohorts. Trial Registration: RU021502I (ACCRU), MISP #52192 (Merck), NCT02949219 (clinicaltrials.gov). Funding Statement: Primary study funding and investigational product was provided by the Merck Investigator Studies Program (MISP), and additional site-specific funding provided by the Kavanagh Family Foundation (MDACC) and Kevin T. Doner Memorial Fund (MDACC). Declaration of Interests: None to declare Ethics Approval Statement: Ethics board review and human research protections monitoring were performed at each institution. The trial was conducted according to ICH GCP.

154 Background: Our prior work has shown that PI3K-altered colorectal cancer (CRC), with PIK3CA mutation or PTEN loss, has increased expression of key immune checkpoints (including PD-L1) resulting in immune evasion, despite increased immune engagement. Here, we investigated the impact of PI3K-AKT inhibition on the immune repertoire of CRC. Methods: Multiplex immunofluorescence was performed using two Vectra panels [1: AE1/AE3, CD3, CD8, PD-1, PD-L1, CD68; and 2: AE1/AE3, CD3, CD8, Granzyme B (GzB), CD45RO, FoxP3] on paired biopsies (baseline and cycle 1 day 15) from 6 patients with PI3K-altered metastatic CRC (mCRC) treated with AKT inhibitor, MK2206 (200 mg oral weekly), on a phase 2 clinical trial. Separately, one million CT26 CRC cells were implanted in BALB/C-e mice. After 48 hours, 10 mice/group were randomized for treatment with pan-PI3K inhibitor copanlisib (C, 10 mg/Kg IV 2x/week), anti-PD-1 (P, 200 µg IP 2x/week), copanlisib + anti-PD-1 (C+P), or control (Ct), for 21 days. Mouse tumors were stained with 6-plex immunohistochemistry (CD3, CD8, PD-L1, Ki67, GzB, AE1/AE3). Data were analyzed using related-samples Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Student’s t-test, as appropriate. Results: In PI3K-altered mCRC patients, AKT inhibition resulted in a trend towards increased median densities of intratumoral CD8+ T cells (0.8 vs 4.8 density/mm2, P = 0.14) and memory T cells (0 vs 10.3, P = 0.07), and decreased density of macrophages (12.4 vs 0, P = 0.07). No antigen experienced T cells were seen and activated CD8+ T cells were present in 1 patient only. In CT26 mice, PI3K and PD-1 co-inhibition resulted in the smallest mean tumor volumes (C+P 12% of Ct vs C 40% and P 42% of Ct, P < 0.05 for both), and the highest median % of intratumoral CD8+Ki67+ T cells as compared to all other treatment arms (C+P 1.6% vs C 0.5%, P 0.4%, Ct 0.6%, P < 0.05 for each pairwise comparison). C+P also increased the % of total CD3+ and CD8+ cells as compared to Ct and C (P < 0.05 for all). C alone did not increase immune infiltration in this non-PI3K activated model. Conclusions: PI3K-AKT pathway inhibition has the potential to improve effector T cell infiltration in PI3K-altered CRC. PI3K inhibitor synergizes with anti-PD-1 to improve treatment efficacy and CD8+ T cell proliferation. The mechanisms behind this immune repertoire shift are yet to be elucidated, such as via cytokine modulation. Therapeutic approaches to activate the proliferating CD8+ cells would be useful, and may require PI3Kα/β specific inhibitors to allow early T cell activation through PI3Kδ/γ isoforms.

TPS633 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive malignancy with few effective therapeutic options. Over 90% of patients with PDAC harbor activating mutations in KRAS, a known oncogenic driver of tumor growth, cancer cell survival and metastasis thus making for an attractive therapeutic target. However, targeting the most common KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer (KRASG12D and KRASG12V) remains a pharmacological challenge. Exosomes are extracellular nano-vesicles that are efficiently internalized by target cells and are under investigation as a drug-delivery vehicle for various therapeutic payloads, including nucleic acids such as small interfering RNA (siRNA). Previously published pre-clinical data demonstrate effective delivery of exosomes loaded with siRNA targeting KRASG12D leading to tumor control in various murine models of PDAC. Methods: This is a single arm, single institution, phase I trial evaluating treatment with KRASG12D-siRNA loaded exosomes. Large-scale production of KRASG12D-siRNA loaded exosomes from mesenchymal stromal cells will be performed at the MD Anderson Cancer Center using pre-specified GMP-compliant protocols. The primary endpoints of this study are to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of KRASG12D-loaded exosomes and to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Key secondary endpoints include the pharmacokinetics of circulating exosomes, overall response rate, disease control rate (defined as partial responses and patients with stable disease), median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS). Key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, documented progression on one or more lines of systemic therapy, and documented presence of a KRASG12D mutation. Selected correlative studies include measurement of circulating siRNA and KRASG12D DNA using PCR. This trial will enroll up to 28 patients and will follow a 3+3 design for dose escalation. This trial is actively accruing and has enrolled six patients at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03608631.

TPS634 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a devastating malignancy with a dearth of effective therapeutic options. Over 90% of PDAC harbor activating mutations in the KRAS oncoprotein, which in turn leads to activation of downstream effector proteins in the the RAF-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade serving to promote tumor cell survival, growth and metastasis. Unfortunately, single agent treatment with MAPK-inhibitors have had limited therapeutic efficacy in patients with PDAC owing to development of various tumor-cell intrinsic resistance mechanisms, including upregulation of autophagy. Hydroxychloroquine is an antimalarial drug that functions to inhibit autophagy by inhibiting acidification of lysosomes. Previously published preclinical data suggest combination therapy with binimetinib, a MEK 1/2 inhibitor, and hydroxychloroquine leads to enhanced killing of PDAC cells in vitro and in vivo. Methods: This is a single arm, single center phase I trial of binimetinib plus hydroxychloroquine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer harboring a KRAS mutation. All patients will receive binimetinib at a fixed dose of 45mg PO twice daily (14-day cycles) while hydroxychloroquine will be dosed at 400mg PO twice daily (14-day cycles) and dose escalated using a Bayesian optimal interval design with a target toxicity rate of 0.3. Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, prior treatment with at least one line of systemic therapy and a documented KRAS mutation. An estimated 24 patients will be enrolled in the first phase of this study and up to 15 patients in the dose expansion cohort. The primary endpoint of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of hydroxychloroquine when combined with a fixed dose of binimetinib. Key secondary endpoints include safety and toxicity profile, response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). This study is ongoing and has enrolled 10 patients at the time of submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04132505.

TPS643 Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy with limited data to support the choice of systemic chemotherapy beyond the frontline setting. Though second-line therapy has historically been extrapolated from colorectal cancers, recent molecular data has demonstrated small bowel adenocarcinoma to be genomically unique when compared to either colon or gastric cancer. Retrospective analyses of irinotecan- and taxane-based therapies and one prospective phase II clinical trial of nab-paclitaxel have demonstrated likely activity in this cancer. SWOG 1922 explores the clinical activity of FOLFIRI and ramucirumab with paclitaxel in the second- and later-line setting for small bowel adenocarcinoma. Methods: This is a randomized phase II selection design clinical trial of FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and irinotecan) every two weeks or ramucirumab D1,15 and paclitaxel D1,8,15 every 4 weeks with the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include response rate, overall survival, and safety. Archived paraffin tumor tissue collection and serial blood collections are included for correlative analyses. Key eligibility include having mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable small bowel adenocarcinoma (ampullary location excluded); metastatic or locally advanced unresectable disease; prior fluoropyrimidine and/or oxaliplatin therapy; no prior treatment with irinotecan, ramucirumab, or taxanes; no recent bleeding, blood clots, or bowel perforation/fistula; and Zubrod performance status of 0/1. Measurable disease is not required. The null hypothesis is median PFS of 2.5 months. If a median PFS of at least 3.5 months is observed in one or both arms, the goal is to choose the better regimen with respect to this endpoint. The design provides a 90% probably of selecting the more active arm, assuming a hazard ratio of 1.4, if both arms meet this threshold. This trial is open and, as of September 1, 2021, 17 of 94 planned patients have been enrolled. NCT04205968. Funding: NIH/NCI/NCTN grants U10CA180888, U10CA180819, U10CA180820, U10CA180821, U10CA180868; and in part by Eli Lilly and Company. Clinical trial information: NCT04205968.

22 Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), and colitis-associated CRC (CA-CRC) mortality is on the rise. It has been postulated that CA-CRC may be contributing to the increasing prevalence of early-onset CRC (EOCRC) but supportive studies are currently lacking. Molecular and clinical differences between CA-CRC and sporadic-CRC (S-CRC) have been reported, however outcomes for CA-CRC remains unclear. Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) is a rare subtype of CRC which is seen at higher frequencies, along with mucinous histology, in both CA-CRC and EOCRC. In this study, we validate the association of SRC and mucinous (SRC/M) histology with CA-CRC and EOCRC, and utilize it to estimate the amount of EOCRC attributable to undiagnosed or subclinical IBD. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using three independent mCRC patient datasets from MDACC. The mATTACC discovery cohort consisted of 32 IBD- and 425 S-mCRC patients enrolled in a prospective biomarker trial. Validation of tumor histology was completed with a tumor registry (n=1696), excluding the MSI-High samples, and a real-world evidence (RWE) cohort from MDACC containing 269 CA-mCRC and 29,596 S-mCRC patients, was used as our validation cohort. Results: In the mATTACC cohort SRC/M histology was found in 37.5% of CA-mCRC and 11.7% of S-mCRC, showing a strong association between SRC/M and CA-mCRC (OR = 4.54, 95% CI: 2.19-9.43). The RWE cohort confirmed the correlation of SRC/M with CA-mCRC (28.6%) relative to S-mCRC (11.4%) patients (OR = 3.13, 95%CI: 2.39-4.09). An association was found between SRC/M and EOCRC (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.24-1.47). By comparing the prevalence of SRC/M in EOCRC and late-onset CRC and correcting by the proportion of CA-CRC cases with SRC/M histology, we estimate that between 8.28% to 10.15% of EOCRC may attributable to undiagnosed/subclinical IBD. Using the RWE cohort, median overall survival was determined to be lower for CA-mCRC (31m) relative to S-mCRC (39m; p=0.007), yielding a HR of 1.26 (95% CI: 1.06-1.48). CA-mCRC patients with EOCRC (25m) were also found to have significantly worse outcomes than S-mCRC patients (40m) with EOCRC (p=0.0005; HR = 1.61, 95%CI: 1.23-2.11). Within CA-mCRC, patients with SRC or SRC/M histology (21m) had decreased OS compared to mucinous histology (51m), indicating the poor prognosis of SRC in CA-mCRC (p=0.028; HR=0.53, 95% CI: 0.3-0.94). Conclusions: Tumor biology consistent with CA-CRC, including SRC/M histology, may be present in 8.3% – 10.2% of patients with EOCRC without a clinical diagnosis of IBD, and harbors worse outcomes. Although other confounding biology may be underlying this association, recognition of undiagnosed IBD in CRC patients, especially those with metastatic disease, is important as it may impact prognosis and treatment strategies for this high-risk patient population.

12 Background: Encorafenib (E) and cetuximab (C) offers short-lived response and survival benefit for patients (pts) with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). BRAF + EGFR inhibition induced a transient MSI-H phenotype in preclinical models of MSS, BRAFV600E CRC and may prime these tumors for response to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 antibodies like nivolumab (N). Methods: In this single-arm, single-institution, phase I/II clinical trial, pts with treatment-refractory MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC were eligible. No prior BRAF inhibitors, anti-EGFR antibody, or immunotherapy was permitted. Pts received E (300 mg PO daily), C (500 mg/m2 IV q14 days), and N (480 mg IV q28 days). The primary endpoints were best overall response (RECIST 1.1) and safety/tolerability (CTCAE v5). A Simon two-stage design (H0: p≤.22; Ha: p≥.45, where p= percentage of pts with radiographic response) was employed using a one-sided α=.05 and β=.20. In the first stage, ≥ 4/15 responses were needed in order for the trial to enroll 11 additional pts. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. Results: All 26 pts have been enrolled - 23 patients treated, and 21 evaluable for response so far. Median age is 59 years (range, 32-85), and 14 (54%) are female. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (AE) occurred in 4/22 (18%) patients. Grade 3 AEs included colitis, maculopapular rash, leukocytosis, and elevated amylase/lipase (all N=1). Grade 4 AEs in a single patient were myositis/myocarditis. Overall response rate is 45% (95% CI, 23-68), and disease control rate is 95% (95% CI, 75-100). Median PFS is 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.5-NA). Median OS is 11.4 months (95% CI, 7.6-NA). For the 9 pts thus far with responses, median duration of response is 8.1 months (95% CI, 7.3-NA). Updated results will be presented. Conclusions: E + C + N is effective and well-tolerated for pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC. The E+C+N regimen met its predefined efficacy endpoint and suggests a role for immunotherapy as a novel combination approach for this specific subpopulation of MSS metastatic CRC. A follow-up randomized phase II trial (SWOG 2107) to evaluate encorafenib/cetuximab with or without nivolumab in pts with MSS, BRAFV600E metastatic CRC will activate in early 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04017650.

Nivolumab is a PD-1 inhibitor approved for the use in treatment of multiple tumor types (such as melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma). In July 2017, the US FDA granted accelerated approval of this agent for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer patients whose tumor harbors deficient mismatch repair, or microsatellite-instability high and have progressed on conventional chemotherapy. In this review, we will discuss the use, efficacy, and safety of this agent in microsatellite-instability high metastatic colorectal cancer.

With the recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals of pembrolizumab and nivolumab for refractory deficient mismatch repair metastatic colorectal cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors have now entered into clinical care for gastrointestinal cancers. Extensive ongoing efforts are exploring additional combinations of therapy in both deficient and proficient mismatch repair colorectal cancer. This review will outline the current status of such efforts and discuss the critical aspects of recognition and management of immune-related toxicities from checkpoint inhibitors.

Purpose: Colorectal cancers are classified as right/left-sided based on whether they occur before/after the splenic flexure, with established differences in molecular subtypes and outcomes. However, it is unclear if this division is optimal and whether precise tumor location provides further information. Experimental Design: In 1,876 patients with colorectal cancer, we compared mutation prevalence and overall survival (OS) according to side and location. Consensus molecular subtype (CMS) was compared in a separate cohort of 608 patients. Results: Mutation prevalence differed by side and location for TP53, KRAS, BRAFV600, PIK3CA, SMAD4, CTNNB1, GNAS, and PTEN. Within left- and right-sided tumors, there remained substantial variations in mutation rates. For example, within right-sided tumors, RAS mutations decreased from 70% for cecal, to 43% for hepatic flexure location (P = 0.0001), while BRAFV600 mutations increased from 10% to 22% between the same locations (P < 0.0001). Within left-sided tumors, the sigmoid and rectal region had more TP53 mutations (P = 0.027), less PIK3CA (P = 0.0009), BRAF (P = 0.0033), or CTNNB1 mutations (P < 0.0001), and less MSI (P < 0.0001) than other left-sided locations. Despite this, a left/right division preceding the transverse colon maximized prognostic differences by side and transverse colon tumors had K-modes mutation clustering that appeared more left than right sided. CMS profiles showed a decline in CMS1 and CMS3 and rise in CMS2 prevalence moving distally. Conclusions: Current right/left classifications may not fully recapitulate regional variations in tumor biology. Specifically, the sigmoid-rectal region appears unique and the transverse colon is distinct from other right-sided locations. Clin Cancer Res; 24(5); 1062–72. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Dienstmann, p. 989

Background The assessment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) response to therapy remains challenging. The objective of this study was to investigate whether changes in the tumor/parenchyma interface are associated with response. Methods Computed tomography (CT) scans before and after therapy were reviewed in 4 cohorts: cohort 1 (99 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgery); cohort 2 (86 patients with stage IV PDAC who received chemotherapy), cohort 3 (94 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received protocol-based neoadjuvant gemcitabine chemoradiation), and cohort 4 (47 patients with stage I/II PDAC who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation and were prospectively followed in a registry). The tumor/parenchyma interface was visually classified as either a type I response (the interface remained or became well defined) or a type II response (the interface became poorly defined) after therapy. Consensus (cohorts 1-3) and individual (cohort 4) visual scoring was performed. Changes in enhancement at the interface were quantified using a proprietary platform. Results In cohort 1, type I responders had a greater probability of achieving a complete or near-complete pathologic response (21% vs 0%; P = .01). For cohorts 1, 2, and 3, type I responders had significantly longer disease-free and overall survival, independent of traditional covariates of outcomes and of baseline and normalized cancer antigen 19-9 levels. In cohort 4, 2 senior radiologists achieved a κ value of 0.8, and the interface score was associated with overall survival. The quantitative method revealed high specificity and sensitivity in classifying patients as type I or type II responders (with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.92 in cohort 1, 0.96 in cohort 2, and 0.89 in cohort 3). Conclusions Changes at the PDAC/parenchyma interface may serve as an early predictor of response to therapy. Cancer 2018;124:1701-9. © 2018 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Cancer Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Background The optimal management of patients with follicular lymphoma Grade 3 (FLG3) is controversial. Patients and Methods This is a case series of 45 patients with FLG3 treated with first-line R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) and observed for an extended time interval. Results The overall response rate was 100% and the median progression-free survival (PFS) has not been reached, with a 3-year PFS of 70%; 14 (31%) patients relapsed, nearly all within 3 years. The baseline characteristic more strongly associated with a shorter PFS were lymph >4 node sites and presence of B symptoms. Three patients later progressed to diffuse large B cell lymphoma, all had baseline elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase level and high International Prognostic Index score. Median overall survival has not been reached. All 4 patients who later developed acute myeloid leukemia were older than 60 years at the time of start of therapy. Conclusion R-CHOP is an effective first-line treatment for patients with FLG3, and might provide extended PFS, comparable with outcomes observed in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, particularly in subgroups with limited nodal disease.

Currently, treatment of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) mirrors that of colorectal cancer (CRC). Recent genomic data have demonstrated SBA to be a genetically unique entity, suggesting that therapies not traditionally utilized in CRC should be explored. In order to further characterize the activity of taxanes in this rare cancer, we completed a single-center retrospective study. Twenty patients were found to have been treated with taxane-based regimens (monotherapy in 3, combination therapy in 17). Median time to progression was 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9–4.6), and median overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI: 3.1–18.3). The results of this study demonstrate clinical activity from taxane-based therapy in advanced SBA and support further clinical trial investigation.

BackgroundDefective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) leads to high levels of microsatellite-instability (MSI-H) and insertions or deletions in coding regions, resulting in the generation of tumor-specific frameshift peptides (FSPs). We selected 209 shared FSPs among subjects with first- or second-line metastatic dMMR/MSI-H colorectal (CRC), gastric, and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, to develop an off-the-shelf vaccine for the treatment of dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Selected FSPs were cloned into four proprietary Great Apes Adenoviral (GAd) and four Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectors to generate a polyvalent viral vectored vaccine called Nous-209 [Leoni G., et al., Cancer Res. 2020]MethodsThis phase 1 first in human (FIH) study (NCT04041310) was designed to evaluate safety and tolerability of two dose levels (one log difference for both GAd and MVA) of Nous-209 genetic polyvalent vaccine in combination with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody pembrolizumab, to assess immunogenicity of the combination and to detect preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Nous-209 is administered intramuscularly, concomitantly with pembrolizumab (doses and schedule per approved label): one prime (GAd-209-FSP) at the 2nd pembrolizumab infusion and three booster (MVA-209-FSP) injections at subsequent infusions each 3 weeks apart. The study is composed of two sequential cohorts: dose escalation and dose expansionResultsTwelve evaluable subjects with first- or second-line metastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancers were evaluated as of May 28, 2021. Three subjects enrolled in dose level 1 (2 CRC and 1 GEJ cancer) demonstrated durable confirmed partial responses (PRs). In dose level 2 (6 CRC and 3 gastric cancers), 4 subjects had PRs, 2 had stable disease (SD) and 3 had progressive disease (PD). The median follow-up for subjects in dose level 1 is 17.9 months (range 15.3–20 months), and 8 months (range 3.8–12.5 months) for subjects in dose level 2 as of the above cut-off date. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and the treatment combination was determined to be safe and tolerable. Vaccine immunogenicity was demonstrated by ex-vivo interferon-gamma ELISpot assay in 67% of subjects in dose level 1, and 100% of patients with evaluable samples in dose level 2ConclusionsThe combination of the Nous-209 genetic polyvalent cancer vaccine and pembrolizumab has been demonstrated to be safe, immunogenic, and continues to show early signs of clinical efficacy, which may be attributed to the vaccine contributionReferenceLeoni G, et al. A genetic vaccine encoding shared cancer neoantigens to treat tumors with microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 2020 July 20;80(18):3972–3982.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, IRB number 2019–0651_MOD001. The study was approved by Feinstein Institute for Medical Research Northwell Health, IRB number 19–1086. The study was approved by WCG The Trusted Partner in Ethical Review, IRB number 20200155. The study was approved by Johns Hopkins Medicine, IRB number IRB00220323/CIR00053809. The study was approved by City of Hope, IRB number 19277/176947. The study was approved by Advarra Advancing Better Research. The study was approved by Dana-Faber Cancer Institute. The study was approved by Weill Cornell IRB. The study was approved by Roswell Park IRB.

This cohort study examines the clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Context No clinical trials have examined the effect of netupitant/palonosetron (NEPA) on chronic nausea in patients with cancer. Objectives In this pilot randomized trial, we assessed the efficacy of NEPA and placebo on chronic nausea. Methods This double-blind, parallel, randomized trial enrolled patients with cancer and chronic nausea for at least 1 month, intensity ≥4/10 and not on moderately or highly emetogenic systemic therapies. Patients started with a placebo run-in period from days 1 to 5; those without a placebo response proceeded to the double-blinded phase between days 6 to 15 (NEPA: placebo 2:1 ratio). The primary outcome was within-group change in average nausea over the 24 hours on a 0–10 numeric rating scale between day 5 and 15. Results Among the 53 enrolled patients, 46 proceeded to placebo run-in and 33 had blinded treatment (22 NEPA and 11 placebo). We observed a statistically significant within-group improvement in nausea numeric rating scale between day 5 and 15 in the NEPA group (mean change, −2.0; 95% CI, −3.1 to −0.8) and the placebo group (mean change, −2.3; 95% CI, −3.9 to −0.7). A complete response was achieved in 8 (38%) patients in the NEPA group and 2 (20%) in the placebo group by day 15. No grade 3–4 toxicities were attributed to NEPA. There were no statistically significant between-group differences for the primary/secondary outcomes. Conclusions NEPA and placebo were associated with similar magnitude of within-group improvement in chronic nausea without significant between-group differences (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03040726).

Background Metastatic small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) has a poor prognosis. Due to its rarity, high-quality data are lacking to guide treatment. This retrospective analysis was conducted to help characterize the treatment options for patients with metastatic SBA while providing clinically meaningful prognostic information. Patients and methods In total, 437 patients who initially presented with or developed metastatic SBA between September 1977 and September 2019 were identified from the MD Anderson Tumor Registry. Clinical data were collected from review of the medical record. Overall response rates (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS) were assessed across various treatments and treatment lines. Results The median OS from diagnosis of metastatic disease was 15.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.3-17.9]. Seventy-five patients (17.1%) underwent metastasectomy, which was associated with a median OS of 34.5 versus 17.1 months among patients who received chemotherapy alone (P < 0.001). Fluoropyrimidine plus platinum (n = 164) was the most common first-line chemotherapy, associated with an ORR of 59% and TTP of 8.1 months. Irinotecan with 5-FU (n = 101) was the most common second-line therapy associated with an ORR of 31% and TTP of 4.0 months. Twenty-two patients received immunotherapy; 5 of 6 patients with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) responded, while 0 of 16 with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) responded. Taxane-based chemotherapy was given to 34 patients with an ORR of 21% and a median TTP of 2.4 months. Among 11 patients who received anti-epidermal-growth-factor-receptor (EGFR) monotherapy, the best response was stable disease (SD) in 1 patient. Conclusions In well-selected patients with SBA, metastasectomy appears to be associated with improved OS. This improvement was seen across metastasectomy sites, including liver, lung and peritoneal. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) based immunotherapy was active for dMMR SBA but not pMMR SBA. While taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrates therapeutic activity, the activity of anti-EGFR therapy was limited., Highlights • Metastasectomy for well-selected metastatic SBA patients was associated with improved OS. • Anti-PD1-based immunotherapy was active for dMMR SBA but not pMMR SBA. • Taxane-based chemotherapy demonstrated clinical activity in refractory SBA. • Anti-EGFR therapy demonstrated minimal activity in SBA.

Purpose: Survival for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients is extremely poor and improved therapies are urgently needed. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) adoptive cell therapy (ACT) has shown great promise in other tumor types, such as metastatic melanoma where overall response rates of 50% have been seen. Given this success and the evidence showing that T-cell presence positively correlates with overall survival in PDAC, we sought to enrich for CD8+ TILs capable of autologous tumor recognition. In addition, we explored the phenotype and T-cell receptor repertoire of the CD8+ TILs in the tumor microenvironment. Experimental Design: We used an agonistic 4-1BB mAb during the initial tumor fragment culture to provide 4-1BB costimulation and assessed changes in TIL growth, phenotype, repertoire, and antitumor function. Results: Increased CD8+ TIL growth from PDAC tumors was achieved with the aid of an agonistic 4-1BB mAb. Expanded TILs were characterized by an activated but not terminally differentiated phenotype. Moreover, 4-1BB stimulation expanded a more clonal and distinct CD8+ TIL repertoire than IL2 alone. TILs from both culture conditions displayed MHC class I-restricted recognition of autologous tumor targets. Conclusions: Costimulation with an anti-4-1BB mAb increases the feasibility of TIL therapy by producing greater numbers of these tumor-reactive T cells. These results suggest that TIL ACT for PDAC is a potential treatment avenue worth further investigation for a patient population in dire need of improved therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(23); 7263–75. ©2017 AACR.

ObjectiveThe purpose was to validate the prognostic value of an early optimal morphological response on CT in patients treated with bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). It also evaluated the prognostic value of size-based criteria and the association of optimal morphological response with the receipt of bevacizumab.Design141 patients treated first using bevacizumab and 142 patients from a randomised study evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy were retrospectively analysed. Radiologists evaluated pretreatment and restaging CT scans using morphological response criteria. Responses were also assessed with size-based criteria: Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and deepness of response (DpR). The ability of each criterion to predict progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and postprogression survival (PPS) was determined using a univariate Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsIn both populations, median PFS was significantly longer for patients achieving an optimal morphological response (10.4 vs 6.8 months, p=0.03; and 8.3 vs 4.9 months, pConclusionIn patients with unresectable CLM, early morphological response may be a better predictor of PFS than size-based response. The addition of bevacizumab improves morphological response rate.

Summary Background Metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis after treatment with conventional chemotherapy and exhibits high levels of tumour neoantigens, tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes, and checkpoint regulators. All of these features are associated with the response to PD-1 blockade in other tumour types. Therefore, we aimed to study nivolumab, a PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods In this ongoing, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer locally assessed as dMMR/MSI-H from 31 sites (academic centres and hospitals) in eight countries (Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Ireland, Italy, Spain, and the USA). Eligible patients had progressed on or after, or been intolerant of, at least one previous line of treatment, including a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin or irinotecan. Patients were given 3 mg/kg nivolumab every 2 weeks until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxic effects, or withdrawal from study. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in all analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02060188. Findings Of the 74 patients who were enrolled between March 12, 2014, and March 16, 2016, 40 (54%) had received three or more previous treatments. At a median follow-up of 12·0 months (IQR 8·6–18·0), 23 (31·1%, 95% CI 20·8–42·9) of 74 patients achieved an investigator-assessed objective response and 51 (69%, 57–79) patients had disease control for 12 weeks or longer. Median duration of response was not yet reached; all responders were alive, and eight had responses lasting 12 months or longer (Kaplan-Meier 12-month estimate 86%, 95% CI 62–95). The most common grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were increased concentrations of lipase (six [8%]) and amylase (two [3%]). 23 (31%) patients died during the study; none of these deaths were deemed to be treatment related by the investigator. Interpretation Nivolumab provided durable responses and disease control in pre-treated patients with dMMR/MSI-H metastatic colorectal cancer, and could be a new treatment option for these patients. Funding Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Developing realistic preclinical models using clinical samples that mirror complex tumor biology and behavior are vital to advancing cancer research. While cell line cultures have been helpful in generating preclinical data, the genetic divergence between these and corresponding primary tumors has limited clinical translation. Conversely, patient-derived xenografts (PDX) in colorectal cancer are highly representative of the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in the original tumor. Coupled with high-throughput analyses and bioinformatics, these PDXs represent robust preclinical tools for biomarkers, therapeutic target, and drug discovery. Successful PDX engraftment is hypothesized to be related to a series of anecdotal variables namely, tissue source, cancer stage, tumor grade, acquisition strategy, time to implantation, exposure to prior systemic therapy, and genomic heterogeneity of tumors. Although these factors at large can influence practices and patterns related to xenotransplantation, their relative significance in determining the success of establishing PDXs is uncertain. Accordingly, we systematically examined the predictive ability of these factors in establishing PDXs using 90 colorectal cancer patient specimens that were subcutaneously implanted into immunodeficient mice. Fifty (56%) PDXs were successfully established. Multivariate analyses showed tissue acquisition strategy [surgery 72.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): 58.2–82.6) vs. biopsy 35% (95% CI: 22.1%–50.6%)] to be the key determinant for successful PDX engraftment. These findings contrast with current empiricism in generating PDXs and can serve to simplify or liberalize PDX modeling protocols. Better understanding the relative impact of these factors on efficiency of PDX formation will allow for pervasive integration of these models in care of colorectal cancer patients. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(7); 1435–42. ©2017 AACR.

// Krittiya Korphaisarn 1, 2 , Van Karlyle Morris 1 , Michael J. Overman 1 , David R. Fogelman 1 , Bryan K. Kee 1 , Kanwal Pratap Singh Raghav 1 , Shanequa Manuel 1 , Imad Shureiqi 1 , Robert A. Wolff 1 , Cathy Eng 1 , David Menter 1 , Stanley R. Hamilton 3 , Scott Kopetz 1 and Arvind Dasari 1 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 2 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand 3 Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA Correspondence to: Arvind Dasari, email: adasari@mdanderson.org Keywords: colorectal cancer, FBXW7 , mutation, missense, prognosis Received: January 25, 2017 Accepted: March 02, 2017 Published: April 05, 2017 ABSTRACT Background: FBXW7 functions as a ubiquitin ligase tagging multiple dominant oncogenic proteins and commonly mutates in colorectal cancer. Data suggest missense mutations lead to greater loss of FBXW7 function than other gene aberrations do. However, the clinicopathologic factors and outcomes associated with FBXW7 missense mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have not been described. Methods: Data were obtained from mCRC patients whose tumors were evaluated by next-generation sequencing for hotspot mutations at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Alterations in FBXW7 were identified, and their associations with clinicopathologic features and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: Of 855 mCRC patients, 571 had data on FBXW7 status; 43 (7.5%) had FBXW7 mutations, including 37 with missense mutations. R465C mutations in exon 9 were the most common missense mutations (18.6%). PIK3CA mutations were associated with FBXW7 missense mutations (p=0.012). On univariate analysis, patients with FBXW7 missense mutations had significantly worse OS (median 28.7 mo) than those with wild-type FBXW7 (median 46.6 mo; p=0.003). On multivariate analysis including other known prognostic factors such as BRAF mutations, FBXW7 missense mutations were the strongest negative prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.0; p=0.003). Conclusions : In the largest clinical dataset of mCRC to date, FBXW7 missense mutations showed a strong negative prognostic association.

Background Exosomes arise from viable cancer cells and may reflect a different biology than circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) shed from dying tissues. We compare exosome-derived DNA (exoDNA) to cfDNA in liquid biopsies of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients and methods Patient samples were obtained between 2003 and 2010, with clinically annotated follow up to 2015. Droplet digital PCR was performed on exoDNA and cfDNA for sensitive detection ofKRAS mutants at codons 12/13. A cumulative series of 263 individuals were studied, including a discovery cohort of 142 individuals: 68 PDAC patients of all stages; 20 PDAC patients initially staged with localized disease, with blood drawnafter resection for curative intent; and 54 age-matched healthy controls. A validation cohort of 121 individuals (39 cancer patients and 82 healthy controls) was studied to validateKRAS detection rates in early-stage PDAC patients. Primary outcome was circulatingKRAS status as detected by droplet digital PCR. Secondary outcomes were disease-free and overall survival. Results KRAS mutations in exoDNA, were identified in 7.4%, 66.7%, 80%, and 85% of age-matched controls, localized, locally advanced, and metastatic PDAC patients, respectively. Comparatively, mutantKRAS cfDNA was detected in 14.8%, 45.5%, 30.8%, and 57.9% of these individuals. Higher exoKRAS MAFs were associated with decreased disease-free survival in patients with localized disease. In the validation cohort, mutantKRAS exoDNA was detected in 43.6% of early-stage PDAC patients and 20% of healthy controls. Conclusions Exosomes are a distinct source of tumor DNA that may be complementary to other liquid biopsy DNA sources. A higher percentage of patients with localized PDAC exhibited detectableKRAS mutations in exoDNA than previously reported for cfDNA. A substantial minority of healthy samples demonstrated mutantKRAS in circulation, dictating careful consideration and application of liquid biopsy findings, which may limit its utility as a broad cancer-screening method.

RAS mutations are associated with limited overall survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Our aim was to determine criteria for considering hepatectomy for patients with RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases.Of 1,163 patients who underwent liver resection for colorectal liver metastases during 2005-2014, all patients operated on with curative intent who had known RAS mutation status were included. Factors associated with overall survival were determined using multivariate analysis.A total of 524 patients met the inclusion criteria; 212 (40%) had mutated RAS. Mutations were located on codon 12 in 128 patients (60%) and codon 13 in 29 (14%). At median follow-up of 38 months, median overall survival was 72.6 months for wild-type RAS and 50.9 months for mutated RAS (P .001). Median overall survival for patients with codon 12 and 13 mutations was 51.9 and 50.9 months, respectively (P = .839), significantly worse than for patients with wild-type RAS (P = .005, and P = .038 for codon 12 and 13, respectively). For patients with RAS mutation, factors associated independently with worse overall survival were node-positive primary tumor, tumor3 cm, and7 cycles of preoperative chemotherapy. Major and 2-stage hepatectomy were not associated independently with overall survival. Median overall survival was 57, 41, and 21.5 months for patients with 1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively. There were no 4-year survivors in the highest-risk group.Patients with multiple risk factors had poor overall survival after curative resection of RAS mutant colorectal liver metastases. For such patients, hepatectomy may be ill advised, and alternative therapies or further systemic therapy should be considered.

Although preoperative therapy is increasingly administered to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the role of preoperative therapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater is undefined. All patients with ampullary cancer who were evaluated between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative complications, and overall survival were compared between patients who underwent surgery de novo and those who received preoperative therapy before pancreatoduodenectomy. A total of 142 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy: 43 (30.3%) who received preoperative therapy and 99 (69.7%) who did not. Preoperative therapy consisted of chemoradiation (65%), chemotherapy (7%), or both (28%). Patients who underwent surgery first had a lower comorbidity index (p

In vitro, EGFR inhibition, combined with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, causes synergistic cytotoxicity for BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer, further augmented by irinotecan. The safety and efficacy of vemurafenib, irinotecan, and cetuximab in BRAF-mutated malignancies are not defined. In this 3+3 phase I study, patients with BRAFV600E-advanced solid cancers received cetuximab and irinotecan with escalating doses of vemurafenib. Nineteen patients (18 with metastatic colorectal cancer and 1 with appendiceal cancer) were enrolled. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The MTD of vemurafenib was 960 mg twice daily. Six of 17 evaluable patients (35%) achieved a radiographic response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, consistent with in vivo models demonstrating tumor regressions with the triplet regimen. Median progression-free survival was 7.7 months. BRAFV600E circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) trends correlated with radiographic changes, and acquired mutations from cfDNA in genes reactivating MAPK signaling were observed at progression. Significance: Vemurafenib, in combination with irinotecan and cetuximab, was well tolerated in patients with refractory, BRAF-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, and both survival outcomes and response rates exceeded prior reports for vemurafenib and for irinotecan plus cetuximab in BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer. In vivo models demonstrated regressions with the triplet, in contrast with vemurafenib and cetuximab alone. cfDNA predicted radiographic response and identified mutations reactivating the MAPK pathway upon progression. Cancer Discov; 6(12); 1352–65. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1293

Approximately 10% of patients with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) colorectal cancer showed clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 monotherapy (NCT01876511). We sought to identify biomarkers that delineate patients with immunoreactive colorectal cancer and to explore new combinatorial immunotherapy strategies that can impact MMRp colorectal cancer.We compared the expression of 44 selected immune-related genes in the primary colon tumor of 19 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who responded (Although both IL17The detection of a preexisting antitumor immune response in MMRp colorectal cancer (immunoreactive MMRp colorectal cancer) is not sufficient to predict a clinical benefit to T-cell checkpoint inhibitors. Intratumoral IL17-mediated signaling may preclude responses to immunotherapy. Drugs targeting the IL17 signaling pathway are available in clinic, and their combination with T-cell checkpoint inhibitors could improve colorectal cancer immunotherapy.

PURPOSE Atypical, non-V600 BRAF ( aBRAF) mutations represent a rare molecular subtype of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preclinical data are used to categorize aBRAF mutations into class II (intermediate to high levels of kinase activity, RAS independent) and III (low kinase activity level, RAS dependent). The clinical impact of these mutations on anti-EGFR treatment efficacy is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 2,084 patients with mCRC at a single institution and from an external cohort of 5,257 circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) samples were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS BRAF mutations were harbored by 257 patients, including 36 with aBRAF mutations: 22 class III, 10 class II, four unclassified. For patients with aBRAF mCRC, median OS was 36.1 months, without a difference between classes, and median OS was 21.0 months for patients with BRAFV600E mCRC. In contrast to right-sided predominance of tumors with BRAFV600E mutation, 53% of patients with aBRAF mCRC had left-sided primary tumors. Concurrent RAS mutations were noted in 33% of patients with aBRAF mCRC, and 67% of patients had microsatellite stable disease. Among patients with aBRAF RAS wild-type mCRC who received anti-EGFR antibodies (monotherapy, n = 1; combination therapy, n = 10), no responses to anti-EGFR therapy were reported, and six patients (four with class III aBRAF mutations, one with class II, and one unclassified) achieved stable disease as best response. Median time receiving therapy was 4 months (range, 1 to 16). In the ctDNA cohort, there was an increased prevalence of aBRAF mutations and subclonal aBRAF mutations ( P < .001 for both) among predicted anti-EGFR exposed compared with nonexposed patients. CONCLUSION Efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy is limited in class II and III aBRAF mCRC. Detection of aBRAF mutations in ctDNA after EGFR inhibition may represent a novel mechanism of resistance.

3521 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI provided robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up data will be presented. Methods: Patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results: For all 45 patients (median follow-up was 13.8 months), ORR was 60% (95% CI 44.3–74.3). Responses were consistent with the overall population across subgroups including age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, prior adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and mutation status (Table). Seven patients (16%) had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had any grade TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Updated response, survival, and safety data after a longer follow-up (median 19.9 months) will be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI demonstrated robust and durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated. Evaluated subgroups had responses consistent with the overall population. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L treatment option for patients with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

Background Signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) is a rare subtype of colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to characterise the genomic alterations and outcomes of SRCC. Methods Medical records of metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients whose tumours were evaluated by NGS analysis were reviewed. SC-mCRC were classified into two groups: SRCC (>50% signet ring cells) and adenocarcinoma (AC) with SC component (≤50% signet ring cells). Results Six hundred and sixty-five mCRC patients were included. Of the 93 mCRC cases with SC features, 63 had slides for review. Of those 63 cases, 35 were confirmed SRCC, and 28 were AC with SC component. Compared with AC group, KRAS and PIK3CA mutations (mts) were found in only 11% (OR: 0.13) and 3% (OR: 0.15) of SRCC cases, respectively. In contrast to the 44% rate of APC mts in AC group, only 3% of SRCC patients had APC mts (OR = 0.04). Conclusions SRCC has distinct molecular features, including low rates of KRAS, PIK3CA and APC mts. Further study to identify activation pathways and potential therapeutic targets are needed.

BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence is increasing in adults younger than 50 years. This study evaluated clinical and molecular features to identify those features unique to early-onset CRC that differentiate these patients from patients 50 years old or older. METHODS Baseline characteristics were evaluated according to the CRC onset age with 3 independent cohorts. A fourth cohort was used to describe the impact of age on the consensus molecular subtype (CMS) prevalence. RESULTS This retrospective review of more than 36,000 patients with CRC showed that early-onset patients were more likely to have microsatellite instability (P = .038), synchronous metastatic disease (P = .009), primary tumors in the distal colon or rectum (P

635 Background: In the phase II CheckMate-142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI (1 mg/kg) provided meaningful clinical benefit in previously treated MSI-H/dMMR mCRC pts after a median follow-up of 13.4 mo. Here, we present long-term follow-up (median 25.4 mo) of these pts. Methods: Pts received NIVO 3 mg/kg + low-dose IPI Q3W (4 doses) followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W until disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator (INV)-assessed objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1). Results: Of 119 treated pts, 76% had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy. ORR and disease control rates (DCR) were 58 and 81%, respectively (Table). Complete response (CR) rate increased with long-term follow-up from 3 (13.4 mo) to 6% (25.4 mo). Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached, with 68% of responses ongoing at data cutoff. At 24 mo, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 60 and 74%, respectively; OS rates were 96, 56, and 29% in pts with CR or partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD), respectively. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 31% of pts; 10% (grade 3–4) and 13% (any grade) of pts had TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up with NIVO + low-dose IPI provides durable clinical benefit with deepening of response and a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals, demonstrating long-term benefit of NIVO + low-dose IPI for previously treated pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT02060188. [Table: see text]

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review seeks to provide an informed prospective on the advances in molecular profiling and analysis of colorectal cancer (CRC). The goal is to provide a historical context and current summary on how advances in gene and protein sequencing technology along with computer capabilities led to our current bioinformatic advances in the field. RECENT FINDINGS: An explosion of knowledge has occurred regarding genetic, epigenetic, and biochemical alterations associated with the evolution of colorectal cancer. This has led to the realization that CRC is a heterogeneous disease with molecular alterations often dictating natural history, response to treatment, and outcome. The consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classification classifies CRC into four molecular subtypes with distinct biological characteristics, which may form the basis for clinical stratification and subtype-based targeted intervention. SUMMARY: This review summarizes new developments of a field moving “Back to the Future.” CRC molecular subtyping will better identify key subtype specific therapeutic targets and responses to therapy.

Purpose: Family history of BRCA-related tumors may correlate with response to chemotherapy and overall survival (OS) in pancreatic cancer. The frequency of germline mutations has been reported in patients predominantly under the age of 60 or with strong family history. We examine the incidence of deleterious germline mutations and compare the chemotherapy responses and OS in an unselected group of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, who were seen at a single cancer center between 2010 and 2016, were included. Germline DNA was sequenced using a 263-gene panel to identify novel mutations (N = 133 MD Anderson cohort, N = 127 TCGA cohort). Chemotherapy response and OS were determined by review of medical records. Results: Deleterious germline mutations were identified in 26 of 133 patients (19.5%). Patients with DNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutations (ATM, BRCA1/2, CDKN2A, CHEK2, ERCC4, PALB2, n = 15) had an improved OS as compared with patients without (16.8 vs. 9.1 months, P = 0.03). Conversely, patients with other deleterious mutations had a trend toward worse OS. However, survival in the latter group was longer (P = NS) in those mutants initially treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. A family history of multiple breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers was associated with DDR gene mutations and better survival. Conclusions: We have identified novel germline mutations that are prognostic for survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. We observe improved survival in patients with DDR gene mutations and worsened survival in patients with deleterious mutations in non-DDR genes.

Immune checkpoint therapy (ICT) has transformed cancer treatment in recent years; however, treatment response is not uniform across tumor types. The tumor immune microenvironment plays a critical role in determining response to ICT; therefore, understanding the differential immune infiltration between ICT-sensitive and ICT-resistant tumor types will help to develop effective treatment strategies. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the immune tumor microenvironment of an ICT-sensitive tumor (melanoma, n = 44) and an ICT-resistant tumor (pancreatic cancer, n = 67). We found that a pancreatic tumor has minimal to moderate infiltration of CD3, CD4, and CD8 T cells; however, the immune infiltrates are predominantly present in the stromal area of the tumor and are excluded from tumoral area compared with melanoma, where the immune infiltrates are primarily present in the tumoral area. Metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) had a lower infiltration of total T cells compared with resectable primary PDACs, suggesting that metastatic PDACs have poor immunogenicity. Further, a significantly higher number of CD68(+) macrophages and VISTA(+) cells (also known as V-domain immunoglobulin suppressor of T cell activation) were found in the pancreatic stromal area compared with melanoma. We identified VISTA as a potent inhibitory checkpoint that is predominantly expressed on CD68+ macrophages on PDACs. These data suggest that VISTA may be a relevant immunotherapy target for effective treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.