Search

Abdominal problems, both as a primary reason for admission or developing as a part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome during an ICU stay, are common in critically ill patients. The definitions, assessment, incidence and outcome of different abdominal signs, symptoms and syndromes are assessed in the current review. General abdominal signs and symptoms include abdominal pain and distension, as well as other signs assessed during the physical examination (e.g. palpation, percussion). Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms include vomiting, high gastric residual volumes, diarrhoea, GI bleeding, paralysis of the lower GI tract, bowel dilatation and absent bowel sounds. Although around half of patients suffer from these symptoms, the reported incidences of single symptoms vary within a large range due to variable definitions and case-mix. In a few studies, the total number of coincident GI symptoms was associated with increased mortality. Although acute abdomen is a well-recognized severe syndrome in emergency medicine, its incidence in ICUs is not known. Next to subjective clinical evaluation, intra-abdominal pressure, as a reproducible numerical variable, provides useful assistance in the assessment of the abdominal compartment, whereas intra-abdominal hypertension has been shown to impair the outcome of the critically ill. In conclusion, abdominal symptoms occur in half of patients in ICUs. Clinical evaluation, albeit largely subjective, remains the main bedside tool to detect abdominal problems and to assess GI function in the critically ill. IAP is a useful additional tool in the assessment of abdominal complications in ICUs.

Shock is defined as a state in which the circulation is unable to deliver sufficient oxygen to meet the demands of the tissues, resulting in cellular dysoxia and organ failure. In this process, the factors that govern the circulation at a haemodynamic level and oxygen delivery at a microcirculatory level play a major role. This manuscript aims to review the blood flow regulation from macro- and micro-haemodynamic point of view and to discuss new potential therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular instability in patients in cardiovascular shock. Despite the recent advances in haemodynamics, the mechanisms that control the vascular resistance and the venous return are not fully understood in critically ill patients. The physical properties of the vascular wall, as well as the role of the mean systemic filling pressure are topics that require further research. However, the haemodynamics do not totally explain the physiopathology of cellular dysoxia, and several factors such as inflammatory changes at the microcirculatory level can modify vascular resistance and tissue perfusion. Cellular vasoactive mediators and endothelial and glucocalix damage are also involved in microcirculatory impairment. All the levels of the circulatory system must be taken into account. Evaluation of microcirculation may help one to detect under-diagnosed shock, and together with classic haemodynamics, guide one towards the appropriate therapy. Restoration of classic haemodynamic parameters is essential but not sufficient to detect and treat patients in cardiovascular shock.

There is much evidence that fluid overload leads to adverse outcomes in perioperative and critically ill patients. Cardiac output monitoring can help us guiding initial and ongoing fluid resuscitation and can help us to assess whether a patient will be responsive to fluids when hypotensive. In recent years, many sophisticated devices that measure a variety of hemodynamic parameters have evolved on the market. We wanted to provide an overview of the different techniques available today, including their validation in different patient populations. In this second part of the review, we focus on non-calibrated techniques, both invasive and non-invasive. For each technique a short overview of the working principle, together with the advantages, disadvantages and the available validation literature is listed. Many promising minimal invasive monitoring devices can help us to further optimize our hemodynamic treatment in both the perioperative and critical care setting. However, the validation data are scarce for many of these techniques, especially in complex circumstances with changing hemodynamics (preload, afterload and contractility), as with the use of fluids and vasoactive medication. The measurements made by these devices, therefore, need to be interpreted with caution. Further improvements and more validation data are needed before these techniques can be implemented in common day practice. Moreover, in severely shocked hemodynamic unstable patients, calibrated techniques are to be preferred over those which are uncalibrated. Hence, the new techniques not only need to be accurate, but also need to be precise in order to keep track of changes.

International audience; Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a leading cause of hospitalization for gastrointestinal disorders [1]. Because of a substantially high mortality of up to 20–30 % in severe cases, early identification of patients who might require transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU) is essential...

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is an important contributor to early organ dysfunction in trauma and sepsis. However, relatively little is known about the impact of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) in general internal medicine, pregnant patients, and those with obesity or burns. The aim of this paper is to review the pathophysiologic implications and treatment options for IAH in these specific situations. A MEDLINE and PubMed search was performed and the resulting body-of-evidence included in the current review on the basis of relevance and scientific merit. There is increasing awareness of the role of IAH in different clinical situations. Specifically, IAH will develop in most (if not all) severely burned patients, and may contribute to early mortality. One should avoid over-resuscitation of these patients with large volumes of fluids, especially crystalloids. Acute elevations in IAP have similar effects in obese patients compared to non-obese patients, but the threshold IAP associated with organ dysfunction may be higher. Chronic elevations in IAP may, in part, be responsible for the pathogenesis of obesity-related co-morbid conditions such as hypertension, pseudotumor cerebri, pulmonary dysfunction, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and abdominal wall hernias. At the bedside, measuring IAP and considering IAH in all critical maternal conditions is essential, especially in preeclampsia/eclampsia where some have hypothesized that IAH may have an additional role. IAH in pregnancy must take into account the precautions for aorto-caval compression and has been associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Recently, IAP has been associated with the cardiorenal dilemma and hepatorenal syndrome, and this has led to the recognition of the polycompartment syndrome. In conclusion, IAH and ACS have been associated with several patient populations beyond the classical ICU, surgical, and trauma patients. In all at risk conditions the focus should be on the early recognition of IAH and prevention of ACS. Patients at risk for IAH should be identified early through measurements of IAP. Appropriate actions should be taken when IAP increases above 15 mm Hg, especially if pressures reach above 20 mm Hg with new onset organ failure. Although non-operative measures come first, surgical decompression must not be delayed if these fail. Percutaneous drainage of ascites is a simple and potentially effective tool to reduce IAP if organ dysfunction develops, especially in burn patients. Escharotomy may also dramatically reduce IAP in the case of abdominal burns.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) have been increasingly recognized in the critically ill over the past decade. The variety of definitions proposed has led to confusion and difficulty in comparing one study to another. DESIGN: An international consensus group of critical care specialists convened at the second World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome to standardize definitions for IAH and ACS based upon the current understanding of the pathophysiology surrounding these two syndromes. METHODS: Prior to the conference the authors developed a blueprint for the various definitions, which was further refined both during and after the conference. The present article serves as the final report of the 2004 International ACS Consensus Definitions Conference and is endorsed by the World Society of Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS). RESULTS: IAH is redefined as an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) at or above 12 mmHg. ACS is redefined as an IAP above 20 mmHg with evidence of organ dysfunction/failure. ACS is further classified as either primary, secondary, or recurrent based upon the duration and cause of the IAH-induced organ failure. Standards for IAP monitoring are set forth to facilitate accuracy of IAP measurements from patient to patient. CONCLUSIONS: State-of-the-art definitions for IAH and ACS are proposed based upon current medical evidence as well as expert opinion. The WSACS recommends that these definitions be used for future clinical and basic science research. Specific guidelines and recommendations for clinical management of patients with IAH/ACS are published in a separate review.

OBJECTIVE: To examine on the basis of a large number of measurements whether increased IAP is associated with increased ICP and decreased CPP in ventilated patients with nontraumatic brain injury. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational clinical study in the medical and surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: We included 11 patients with nontraumatic brain injury who had an ICP and an IAP-monitoring device because of ischemic (n=4), hemorrhagic (n=5), and metabolic (n=2) encephalopathy. METHODS: IAP was continuously measured in the stomach, and ICP was continuously measured through an intraventricular catheter; 214 consecutive measurements were compared. Because of repeated measurements in the patients we used analysis of covariance to control for the variation in ICP and CPP between patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Patients' mean IAP was 3.8-11.8 mmHg, ICP 6.7-15 mmHg, and CPP 70.8-123 mmHg. For ICP the regression coefficient associated with IAP was 0.64+/-0.05 (95% CI 0.56-0.73, partial correlation 0.70) and for CPP -1.36+/-0.3 (95% CI -1.94 to -0.78; partial correlation -0.30). CONCLUSIONS: Increases in IAP are associated with increases in ICP and decreases in CPP in ventilated patients with nontraumatic brain injury, even at low levels of IAP.

OBJECTIVE: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) measurement techniques vary in automaticity and reproducibility. This study evaluated the intra- and interobserver variability of two new IAP measurement techniques. METHODS: A one-half open, 30-l container was used with two IAP catheters (Foley Manometer, balloon-tipped catheter) contained in a 100-ml infusion bag. To simulate intra-abdominal hypertension the container was filled with water using 5-cm increments (0-25 cmH2O). Pressure was determined by observers using the Foley Manometer and simultaneously recorded using an IAP monitor. Observers were blinded to the reference levels. RESULTS: Fifteen observers conducted three pressure readings at each of the six pressure levels with the Foley technique, giving 270 readings. These were paired with the automated monitor readings and the height of the water column. The intra- and interobserver coefficients of variation were low for both methods. The Spearman correlation coefficient was higher than 0.9 for all paired measurements and Bland-Altman analysis comparing the reference H2O column to both measurement techniques showed a very good agreement at all pressure intervals (bias 0.1+/-0.6 cmH2O) and a consistent, low underestimation of the reference water column pressure by both techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Both the Foley Manometer and the IAP monitor are reliable and reproducible methods to measure IAP in this in vitro model. The coefficient of variation for each technique is low and decreases with increasing IAP, the monitor giving more reproducible results than the Foley Manometer.

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: There has been an exponentially increasing interest in intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). Comparison of the published data however is difficult due to the lack of consensus definitions. This review will focus on the available literature from the last 2 years. A Medline and PubMed search was performed using 'intra-abdominal pressure' (IAP), 'intra-abdominal hypertension' (IAH), and 'abdominal compartment syndrome' (ACS) as search items. The aim was to find an answer to the question 'Isn't it time to pay attention to intra-abdominal pressure in the critically ill?' RECENT FINDINGS: Although the number of studies published on this topic is steadily increasing and confirms the pathophysiologic implications of IAH on end-organ function within and outside the abdominal cavity it remains difficult to compare the literature data because the measurement methods and definitions used are not uniform. Provocative data have been published regarding the interactions between the abdominal and thoracic compartments especially in patients with capillary leak and fluid overload; most of this data raises even more questions than it gives answers and may therefore strengthen the nonbelievers who consider IAP, IAH and ACS as epiphenomena in critically ill patients. Unless the international scientific community does not come forward with clear-cut definitions we will keep comparing 'apples with oranges.' SUMMARY: It is time to pay attention to intra-abdominal pressure in the critically ill. It is also time for standardized IAP measurement methods, good consensus definitions and randomized interventional studies.

Objective : To examine the reliability of the extravascular lung water value obtained by single transpulmonary thermodilution in the presence of a large amount of pleural fluid. Design : Observational clinical study. Setting : Medical intensive care unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. Patients and participants : Patients in whom an evacuation of pleural fluid was performed and who had a central venous catheter and a thermistor-tipped arterial thermodilution catheter (PiCCOplus system, Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) for haemodynamic management. Interventions : None. Measurements and results : We included eight patients (mean age 669 /7.9 years) admitted to the medical intensive care unit with diagnoses of septic shock (n /4, of which two patients had ARDS) and cardiogenic shock (n /4). A total of 14 sets transpulmonary thermodilution measurements were obtained before and after evacuation of 7659 /330 ml pleural fluid (some patients received more than one thoracocenthesis). Data of the two samples were compared using the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank sum test. The extravascular lung water index increased from 11.39 /4.8 to 12.19 /4.9 ml/kg (p /0.041) and the pulmonary vascular permeability index increased from 1.99 /0.8 to 2.19 /0.9 (p /0.055). Conclusions : Fluid in the pleural space does not contribute to the volume transversed by the thermal indicator (‘‘cold’’) in single transpulmonary thermodilution measurements and does not cause an overestimation of the extravascular lung water.

The study purpose was to report the first case of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-induced capillary leak syndrome (CLS) in which serial extravascular lung water (EVLW) measurements were performed and to compare this case with previously reported cases. To identify previously reported cases, we performed a literature search, using PubMed with the following search terms: CLS, EVLW, G-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and stem cell transplantation and the references in the bibliographies of the papers retrieved. To obtain additional information about these cases, we contacted the authors by e-mail. We describe the case of a 68-year-old woman who developed severe CLS during G-CSF treatment after autologous haematological stem cell transplantation. CLS is caused by damage to the endothelial cells, resulting in extravasation of plasma proteins and fluid from the capillaries into the extravascular space. This is illustrated by high values of EVLW and pulmonary vascular permeability, necessitating mechanical ventilation. We found five other case reports in the literature. The white blood cell count at the onset of the CLS varied from very low (zero) to very high (90,500/mul). The symptoms began on day 5-9 of the G-CSF treatment. All patients had fever. Three patients were mechanically ventilated and four received renal replacement therapy. Two patients died. Treatment with G-CSF can induce fatal CLS. Monitoring of EVLW in patients with severe CLS may be useful to guide fluid therapy and improve oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE: Although intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) can cause dysfunction of several organs and raise mortality, little information is available on the incidence and risk factors for IAH in critically ill patients. This study assessed the prevalence of IAH and its risk factors in a mixed population of intensive care patients. DESIGN: A multicentre, prospective 1-day point-prevalence epidemiological study conducted in 13 ICUs of six countries. INTERVENTIONS: None. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven patients admitted for more than 24 h to one of the ICUs during the 1-day study period. METHODS: Intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was measured four times (every 6 h) by the bladder pressure method. Data included the demographics, medical or surgical type of admission, SOFA score, etiological factors such as abdominal surgery, haemoperitoneum, abdominal infection, massive fluid resuscitation, and ileus and predisposing conditions such as hypothermia, acidosis, polytransfusion, coagulopathy, sepsis, liver dysfunction, pneumonia and bacteraemia. RESULTS: We enrolled 97 patients, mean age 64+/-15 years, 57 (59%) medical and 40 (41%) surgical admission, SOFA score of 6.5+/-4.0. Mean IAP was 9.8+/-4.7 mmHg. The prevalence of IAH (defined as IAP 12 mmHg or more) was 50.5 and 8.2% had abdominal compartment syndrome (defined as IAP 20 mmHg or more). The only risk factor significantly associated with IAH was the body mass index, while massive fluid resuscitation, renal and coagulation impairment were at limit of significance. CONCLUSION: Although we found a quite high prevalence of IAH, no risk factors were reliably associated with IAH; consequently, to get valid information about IAH, IAP needs to be measured.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review focuses on the available literature published in the past 2 years. MEDLINE and PubMed searches were performed using intraabdominal pressure, intraabdominal hypertension, and abdominal compartment as search items. The aim was to find an answer to the question: "Is it wise not to measure or even not to think about intraabdominal hypertension in ICU?" RECENT FINDINGS: It is difficult to find a good gold standard for intraabdominal pressure measurement. Bladder pressure can be used as an intraabdominal pressure estimate provided it is measured in a reproducible way. Automated continuous intraabdominal pressure monitoring has recently become available. Key messages are (1). body mass index and fluid resuscitation are independent predictors of intraabdominal hypertension; (2). intraabdominal hypertension increases intrathoracic, intracranial, and intracardiac filling pressures; (3). transmural or transabdominal filling pressures combined with volumetric parameters better reflect preload; (4). volumetric target values need to be corrected for baseline ejection fractions; (5). intraabdominal hypertension decreases left ventricular, chest wall and total respiratory system compliance; (6). best positive end-expiratory pressure can be set to counteract intraabdominal pressure; (7). acute respiratory distress syndrome definitions should take into account best positive end-expiratory pressure and intraabdominal pressure but not wedge pressure; (8). lung protective strategies should aim at deltaPplat (plateau pressure - intraabdominal pressure); (9). intraabdominal hypertension causes atelectasis and increases extravascular lung water; (10). intraabdominal hypertension is an independent predictor of acute renal failure; (11). monitoring of abdominal perfusion pressure can be useful; and (12). intraabdominal hypertension triggers bacterial translocation and multiple organ system failure. SUMMARY: The answer is that it is unwise not to measure intraabdominal pressure in the ICU or even not to think about it.

We are very excited to present to you this issue of “Anae­ sthe siology and Intensive Therapy” (AIT) containing the Proceedings of the Fourth International Fluid Academy Days (iFAD) with some excellent reviews from internationally renowned experts in their field! This 4th iFAD will deliver once more a compact two­day programme on clinical fluid management, a topic that has been neglected for a long time, and haemodynamic moni­ toring. Although the medical community clearly seems to understand the importance of looking at fluids beyond their role for mere haemodynamic stabilisation, we should treat fluids like any other drug we give to our patients [1, 2]. The side effects of fluids are without doubt more than relevant, and there is increasing evidence that the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis due to the use of unbal­ anced solutions is not as innocent as previously thought [3−5]. Langer et al. [6] nicely illustrate in their review on the effects of intravenous solutions on acid­base equilibrium that the knowledge of the composition of intravenous fluids, along with the application of simple physicochemical rules best described by Stewart’s approach, are pivotal steps to­ wards fully elucidating and predicting alterations of plasma acid­base equilibrium induced by fluid therapy [6]. Fluids have indications and contraindications and in­ deed potential side­effects, and as such the best fluid is probably the one that has not been given to the patient. As Paracelsus nicely put it, it is the dose that makes the poison, and no less is true when it comes to fluid management in the critically ill: it is all about the type of fluids, the dose, the timing, and the speed of administration. As a result, the International Fluid Academy (IFA, www.fluid­academy.org) was founded in 2011 to serve as a platform on which to gather experts in the field and to organise meetings, workshops and teaching courses. The IFA is part of iMERiT (the International Medical Education and Research Initiative, a non­profit organisation based in Belgium). The mission statement of the IFA is to foster education, promote research on fluid management and haemodynamic monitoring, and thereby improve survival of the critically ill by bringing together physicians, nurses, and others from throughout the world and from a variety of clinical disciplines.

Background: Serum procalcitonin (PCT) is considered to be a sensitive marker for the early recognition of severe infection. The aim of this study was to review the diagnostic accuracy of serum procalcitonin levels to predict the risk of septic shock and mortality in patients with secondary peritonitis. Methods: We carried out a retrospective review of patients (November 2010 to November 2012) admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with secondary peritonitis classified into localised peritonitis (LP) or diffuse peritonitis (DP) groups. Organ dysfunction was assessed with the SOFA score. Demographic data was collected as well as results for neutrophil count, C- reactive protein, blood lactate, and PCT levels. The primary end-point was ICU mortality. Results: From a total of 222 patients, 123 were allocated to the LP group and 99 to the DP group. Severe sepsis was observed in 41.9% of all patients in the DP group. The PCT levels increased significantly in the DP group, with the development of septic shock in 29 patients. Higher PCT levels were associated with an increased risk for septic shock with a cut-off value of 15.3 ng mL -1 and an increased risk for mortality with a cut-off value 19.6 ng mL -1 . A total of 59.1% of those who developed septic shock died. Conclusion: An increase in PCT levels is an indirect sign of diffuse secondary peritonitis and this is associated with an increased risk of septic shock. Increased PCT level on admission is associated with an increased risk of mortality in this category of patients.

Purpose: To assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods: Prospective cohort study from January 2011 to January 2013. All children consecutively admitted to the PICU, staying more than 24 hours and requiring bladder catheterization, were included in the study. On admission, demographic data and risk factors for IAH were studied. The intra-abdominal pressure was measured every 6 hours through a bladder catheter until discharge, death, or removal of the catheter. Results: Of the 175 patients, 22 (12.6%) had IAH and 7 (4%) had abdominal compartment syndrome during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. The independent risk factors associated with IAH were the presence of abdominal distension (odds ratio [OR] 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-19.9; P < .0001) and a plateau pressure of more than 30 cm H2O (OR 6.42; 95% CI, 2.13-19.36; P = .01). The presence of IAH was associated with higher mortality (40.9% vs 15.6%; P = .01) and prolonged ICU stay (19.5 [3-97] vs 8 [1-104] days, OR 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .02). Thirty-three (18.8%) patients died in the ICU, and IAH was an independent risk factor for mortality (OR 6.98; 95% CI, 1.75-27.86; P = .006). Conclusion: Intra-abdominal hypertension does occur in about 13% of the critically ill children, albeit less frequently than adult patients, probably related to a better compliance of the abdominal wall. The presence of abdominal distension and a plateau pressure of more than 30 cm H2O was found to be independent predictors of IAH. Children with IAH had higher mortality rate and more prolonged ICU stay.

Background: Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) is less invasive than a pulmonary artery catheter, and is increasingly used in the Intensive Care Unit and the Operating Room. Optimal treatment of the critically ill patient demands adequate, precise and continuous monitoring of clinical parameters. Little is known about staff knowledge of the basic principles and practical implementation of TPTD measurements at the bedside. The aims of this review are to: 1) present the results of a survey on the knowledge of TPTD measurement among 252 nurses and doctors; and 2) to focus on specific situations and common pitfalls in order to improve patient management in daily practice. Methods: Web-based survey on knowledge of PiCCO technology (Pulsion Medical Systems, Feldkirchen, Germany), followed by PubMed and Medline search with review of the relevant literature regarding the use of TPTD in specific situations. Results: In total, 252 persons participated in the survey: 196 nurses (78%) and 56 medical doctors (22%) of whom 17 were residents in training. Knowledge on the use of TPTD appears to be suboptimal, with an average score of 58.3%. Doctors performed better than nurses (62.7% vs 57.0%, P = 0.012). About 190 out of 252 (75.4%) scored at least 50% but only 45 respondents (17.9%) obtained a score of 70% or more. Having five years of PiCCO experience was present in 15.8% of the participants and this was correlated to passing the test, defined as obtaining a test result of ≥ 50% ( P = 0.07) or obtaining a test result of ≥ 70% ( P = 0.05). There were no other parameters significantly predictive for obtaining a result above 50% or above 70% such as gender or doctor versus nurse or Belgian versus Dutch residency, or years of ICU experience. High quality education of nursing and medical staff is necessary to perform the technique correctly and to analyse and interpret the information that can be obtained. Visual inspection of thermodilution curves is important as this can point towards specific pathology. Interpretation of the parameters that can be obtained with TPTD in specific conditions is discussed. Finally, a practical approach is given in ten easy steps for nurses and doctors. Conclusion: TPTD has gained its place in the haemodynamic monitoring field, but, as with any technique, its virtue is only fully appreciated with correct use and interpretation.

Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are consistently associated with morbidity and mortality among the critically ill or injured. Thus, avoiding or potentially treating these conditions may improve patient outcomes. With the aim of improving the outcomes for patients with IAH/ACS, the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome recently updated its clinical practice guidelines. In this article, we review the association between a positive fluid balance and outcomes among patients with IAH/ACS and how optimisation of fluid administration and systemic/regional perfusion may potentially lead to improved outcomes among this patient population.Evidence consistently associates secondary IAH with a positive fluid balance. However, despite increased research in the area of non-surgical management of patients with IAH and ACS, evidence supporting this approach is limited. Some evidence exists to support implementing goal-directed resuscitation protocols and restrictive fluid therapy protocols in shocked and recovering critically ill patients with IAH. Data from animal experiments and clinical trials has shown that the early use of vasopressors and inotropic agents is likely to be safe and may help reduce excessive fluid administration, especially in patients with IAH. Studies using furosemide and/or renal replacement therapy to achieve a negative fluid balance in patients with IAH are encouraging. The type of fluid to be administered in patients with IAH remains far from resolved. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of abdominal perfusion pressure as a resuscitation endpoint in patients with IAH. However, it is important to recognise that IAH either abolishes or increases threshold values for pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness, while the presence of IAH may also result in a false negative passive leg raising test.Correct fluid therapy and perfusional support during resuscitation form the cornerstone of medical management in patients with abdominal hypertension. Controlled studies determining whether the above medical interventions may improve outcomes among those with IAH/ACS are urgently required.

Background: Surveys have demonstrated a lack of physician awareness of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome (IAH/ACS) and wide variations in the management of these conditions, with many intensive care units (ICUs) reporting that they do not measure intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). We sought to determine the association between publication of the 2006/2007 World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS) Consensus Definitions and Guidelines and IAH/ACS clinical awareness and management. Methods: The WSACS Executive Committee created an interactive online survey with 53 questions, accessible from November 2006 until December 2008. The survey was endorsed by the WSACS, the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM). A link to the survey was emailed to all members of the supporting societies. Participants of the 3rd World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome meeting (March 2007, Antwerp, Belgium) were also asked to complete the questionnaire. No reminders were sent. Based on 13 knowledge questions, an overall score was calculated (expressed as percentage). Results: A total of 2,244 of the approximately 10,000 clinicians who were sent the survey responded (response rate: 22.4%). Most of the 2,244 respondents (79.2%) completing the survey were physicians or physicians in training and the majority were residing in North America (53.0%). The majority of responders (85%) were familiar with IAP/IAH/ACS, but only 28% were aware of the WSACS consensus definitions for IAH/ACS. Three quarters of respondents considered the cut-off for IAH to be at least 15 mm Hg, and nearly two thirds believed the cut-off for ACS was higher than the currently suggested consensus definition (20 mm Hg). In 67.8% of respondents, organ dysfunction was only considered a problem with IAP of 20 mm Hg or higher. IAP was measured most frequently via the bladder (91.9%), but the majority reported that they instilled volumes well above the current guidelines. Surgical decompression was frequently used to treat IAH/ACS, whereas medical management was only attempted by about half of the respondents. Decisions to decompress the abdomen were predominantly based on the severity of IAP elevation and presence of organ dysfunction (74.4%). Overall knowledge scores were low (43 +/- 15%); respondents who were aware of the WSACS had a better score compared to those who were not (49.6% vs 38.6%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This survey showed that although most responding clinicians claim to be familiar with IAH and ACS, knowledge of published consensus definitions, measurement techniques, and clinical management is inadequate.

Human beings are constituted mainly of water. In particular, children's total body water might reach 75-80% of their body weight, compared to 60-70% in adults. It is therefore not surprising, that children, especially hospitalized new-borns and infants, are markedly prone to water and electrolyte imbalances. Parenteral fluid therapy is a cornerstone of medical treatment and is thus of exceptional relevance in this patient population. It is crucial to appreciate the fact that intravenous fluids are drugs with very different characteristics, different indications, contraindications and relevant side effects. In the present review, we will summarize the physiology and pathophysiology of water and electrolyte balance, underlining the importance and high prevalence of non-osmotic antidiuretic hormone release in hospitalized and critically ill children. Furthermore, we will discuss the characteristics and potential side effects of available crystalloids for the paediatric population, making a clear distinction between fluids that are hypotonic or isotonic as compared to normal plasma. Finally, we will review the current clinical practice regarding the use of different parenteral fluids in children, outlining both the current consensus on fluids employed for resuscitation and replacement and the ongoing debate concerning parenteral maintenance fluids.

Purpose of review Fluid management is regarded as a cornerstone of successful perioperative care, but fluid prescription is not always treated that way. New insights and guidelines have become available very recently. Recent findings Although most of the recent scientific attention went to resuscitation fluids and the place of hydroxyethyl starches, recent guidelines also emphasize the importance of fluid prescription in a maintenance and a replacement setting. The use of balanced solutions over saline 0.9% gains momentum because recent evidence shows the deleterious effect of chloride-containing solutions on relevant clinical endpoints. Where the debate on the use of starches in septic and critically ill patients seems to be settled after recent trials pointed out several safety issues in the absence of a proven benefit, their intraoperative use is still a matter of debate. A presumably correct use in this setting was proposed recently. Summary The combination of a careful prescription of maintenance fluids, additional replacement solutions tailored to the patient's eventual extra needs and a rational but nonaggressive goal-directed approach to resuscitation fluids seems to be the best practice to avoid fluid-related morbidity. Isotonic balanced crystalloids seem the best pragmatic choice for resuscitation purposes. In certain well defined conditions, colloids can still be used.

There has been an exponentially increasing interest in intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and the abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) over the last decade, and different definitions have been suggested. Nevertheless, there has been an impetus from experts in the field to modify these definitions to reflect our current understanding of the pathophysiology of these syndromes. An international multidisciplinary group of interested doctors met with the goal of agreeing on a set of definitions that could be applied to patients with IAH and ACS. The goal of this consensus group was to provide a conceptual and practical framework to further define ACS, a progressive injurious process that falls under the generalized term 'IAH' and that includes IAH-associated organ dysfunction.In total, 21 North American, Australasian and European surgical, trauma and critical care specialists agreed to standardize the current definitions for IAH, ACS and related conditions in preparation for the second World Congress on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WCACS). The WCACS-meeting was endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and the World Society on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS).The consensus conference (Noosa, Australia; December 7, 2004) was attended by 21 specialists from Europe, Australasia and North America and approximately 70 other congress participants. In advance of the conference, a blueprint for the various definitions was suggested. After the conference the participants corresponded electronically with feedback. A writing committee was formed at the conference and developed the final manuscript based on executive summary documents generated by each participant. The final report of the 2004 International ACS Consensus Definitions Conference has recently been published. This article will describe the long road towards this final publication with the evolution of the different definitions and recommendations from the initial suggestions in 2004 to the further refinement and final publications in 2006 and 2007. It will try to explain how we got there and will also give the percentage of agreement with each proposed definition by the participants.New definitions were offered for some terms, while others were discarded and not kept in the final manuscript. Different cut-offs for defining IAH and ACS were given, as well as broad definitions of primary, secondary and recurrent IAH/ACS. A classification system was introduced taking into account the duration, origin, and etiology of IAH. The use of an organ severity scoring method, by means of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score when dealing with ACS patients was not recommended as an adjunctive tool to assess morbidity in the final publication.This document reflects a process whereby a group of experts and opinion leaders suggested definitions for IAH and ACS. This document should be used as a reference for the next consensus definitions conference in March 2007.

Cardiovascular dysfunction and failure are commonly encountered in the patient with intra-abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome. Accurate assessment and optimization of preload, contractility, and afterload, in conjunction with appropriate goal-directed resuscitation and abdominal decompression when indicated, are essential to restoring end-organ perfusion and maximizing patient survival. The validity of traditional hemodynamic resuscitation endpoints, such as pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure, must be reconsidered in the patient with intra-abdominal hypertension as these pressure-based estimates of intravascular volume have significant limitations in patients with elevated intra-abdominal pressure. If such limitations are not recognized, misinterpretation of the patient's cardiac status is likely, resulting in inappropriate and potentially detrimental therapy. Appropriate fluid administration is mandatory as under-resuscitation leads to organ failure and over-resuscitation the development of secondary abdominal compartment syndrome, both of which are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Volumetric monitoring techniques have been proven to be superior to traditional intra-cardiac filling pressures in directing the appropriate resuscitation of this patient population. Calculation of the "abdominal perfusion pressure", defined as mean arterial pressure minus intra-abdominal pressure, has been shown to be a beneficial resuscitation endpoint as it assesses not only the severity of the patient's intra-abdominal hypertension, but also the adequacy of abdominal blood flow. Application of a goal-directed resuscitation strategy, including abdominal decompression when indicated, improves cardiac function, reverses end-organ failure, and minimizes intra-abdominal hypertension-related patient morbidity and mortality.

Introduction: There has been an exponentially increasing interest in intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). The aim of this review is to evaluate the evolution in clinical awareness of this syndrome.Methods: A PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine) search and a ScienceDirect (Elsevier B.V.) search of recent literature were performed in order to assess clinical awareness of IAH and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS).Results: In total, 489 articles and 8 clinical surveys have been identified. The results of the landmark papers and the surveys will be briefly discussed in this review.Conclusion: Clinical awareness of ACS is steadily increasing. It is time to pay attention to ACS, but further, it is time to move forward with therapeutic bundles in a multi-centered, outcome trial on IAH/ACS therapy in order to elevate IAH/ACS management to an international standard of care.

Objective To analyze the effect and the time course of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) with net ultrafiltration (UF) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) body fluid volumes in septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). Methods Patients were studied at baseline and after 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours of CVVH treatment. IAP was measured via the bladder, and abdominal perfusion pressure (APP) was calculated as mean arterial pressure minus IAP. Fluid volume excess (VE), total body water (TBW), extracellular body water (ECW), and intracellular body water (ICW) were derived from wholebody bioimpedance analysis (BIA). Results 30 patients entered final analysis, of which 6 died during CVVH (non-survivors). Fluid VE, TBW, ECW, ICW, and IAP significantly decreased in 24 survivors, whereas these variables remained essentially unchangedin non-survivors. APP slowly increased in survivors, while it did not change in nonsurvivors. IAP strongly correlated with VEin survivors: The lower the IAP, the lower the fluid volume excess. Conclusion CVVH with net UF successfully reduced IAP, TBW, ECW, and ICW in critically ill patients who survived 96 h of CVVH. Failure to increase APP was associated with fatal outcome, and, finally, IAP correlated with fluid volume excess. BIA could be helpful to monitor fluid status in patients with AKI.

Pulmonary coagulopathy is a hallmark of lung injury following inhalation trauma. Locally applied heparin attenuates lung injury in animal models of smoke inhalation. Whether local treatment with heparin benefits patients with inhalation trauma is uncertain. The present trial aims at comparing a strategy using frequent nebulizations of heparin with standard care in intubated and ventilated burn patients with bronchoscopically confirmed inhalation trauma. The Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Nebulized HEParin versus Placebo in BURN Patients with Inhalation Trauma (HEPBURN) is an international multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-arm study. One hundred and sixteen intubated and ventilated burn patients with confirmed inhalation trauma are randomized to nebulizations of heparin (the nebulized heparin strategy) or nebulizations of normal saline (the control strategy) every four hours for 14 days or until extubation, whichever comes first. The primary endpoint is the number of ventilator-free days, defined as days alive and breathing without assistance during the first 28 days, if the period of unassisted breathing lasts for at least 24 consecutive hours. As far as the authors know, HEPBURN is the first randomized, placebo-controlled trial, powered to investigate whether local treatment with heparin shortens duration of ventilation of intubated and ventilated burn patients with inhalation trauma. NCT01773083 ( http://www.clinicaltrials.gov ), registered on 16 January 2013. Recruiting. Randomisation commenced on 1 January 2014.

PURPOSE: Thermodilution continuous cardiac output measurements (TDCCO) by pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) have not been validated during therapeutic hypothermia in post-cardiac arrest patients. The calculated cardiac output based on the indirect Fick principle (FCO) using pulmonary artery blood gas mixed venous oxygen saturation (FCO-BG-SvO2) is considered as the gold standard. Continuous SvO2 by PAC (PAC-SvO2) has also not been validated previously during hypothermia. The aims of this study were (1) to compare FCO-BG-SvO2 with TDCCO, (2) to compare PAC-SvO2 with BG-SvO2 and finally (3) to compare FCO with SvO2 obtained via PAC or blood gas. METHODS: We analyzed 102 paired TDCCO/FCO-BG-SvO2 and 88 paired BG-SvO2/PAC-SvO2 measurements in 32 post-cardiac arrest patients during therapeutic hypothermia. RESULTS: TDCCO was significantly although poorly correlated with FCO-BG-SvO2 (R2 0.21, p

PURPOSE: Ice-cold injectate is assumed to provide best accuracy for transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD)-derived cardiac index (CI), global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI), and extravascular lung-water index (EVLWI). Room-temperature injectate might facilitate TPTD. Therefore, this study compares TPTD-results derived from iced injectate with room-temperature injectate TPTDs (TPTDRoom). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five adult intensive care unit patients with PiCCO monitoring (Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany) were included in this observational study. Four hundred one sets of TPTDs were recorded. Each set consisted of four 15 mL TPTDs (twice with 21°C and subsequently twice with 4°C saline). Means of 2 TPTDRoom were compared with means of 2 cold TPTDs (primary end point). RESULTS: Mean CI (4.70±1.60 vs 4.54±1.52 L/min per square meter; P

Over the past decade, critical care ultrasound has gained its place in the armamentarium of monitoring tools. A greater understanding of lung, abdominal, and vascular ultrasound plus easier access to portable machines have revolutionised the bedside assessment of our ICU patients. Because ultrasound is not only a diagnostic test, but can also be seen as a component of the physical exam, it has the potential to become the stethoscope of the 21st century. Critical care ultrasound is a combination of simple protocols, with lung ultrasound being a basic application, allowing assessment of urgent diagnoses in combination with therapeutic decisions. The LUCI (Lung Ultrasound in the Critically Ill) consists of the identification of ten signs: the bat sign (pleural line); lung sliding (seashore sign); the A-lines (horizontal artefact); the quad sign and sinusoid sign indicating pleural effusion; the fractal and tissue-like sign indicating lung consolidation; the B-lines and lung rockets indicating interstitial syndromes; abolished lung sliding with the stratosphere sign suggesting pneumothorax; and the lung point indicating pneumothorax. Two more signs, the lung pulse and the dynamic air bronchogram, are used to distinguish atelectasis from pneumonia. The BLUE protocol (Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency) is a fast protocol (< 3 minutes), also including a vascular (venous) analysis allowing differential diagnosis in patients with acute respiratory failure. With this protocol, it becomes possible to differentiate between pulmonary oedema, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and pneumothorax, each showing specific ultrasound patterns and profiles. The FALLS protocol (Fluid Administration Limited by Lung Sonography) adapts the BLUE protocol to be used in patients with acute circulatory failure. It makes a sequential search for obstructive, cardiogenic, hypovolemic, and distributive shock using simple real-time echocardiography in combination with lung ultrasound, with the appearance of B-lines considered to be the endpoint for fluid therapy. An advantage of lung ultrasound is that the patient is not exposed to radiation, and so the LUCI-FLR project (LUCI favouring limitation of radiation) can be unfolded in trauma patients. Although it has been practiced for 25 years, critical care ultrasound is a relatively young but expanding discipline and can be seen as the stethoscope of the modern intensivist. In this review, the usefulness and advantages of ultrasound in the critical care setting are discussed in ten points. The emphasis is on a holistic approach, with a central role for lung ultrasound.

The recent definitions on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), intra-abdominal volume (IAV) and abdominal compliance (Cab) are a step forward in understanding these important concepts. They help our understanding of the pathophysiology, aetiology, prognosis, and treatment of patients with low Cab. However, there is still a relatively poor understanding of the different methods used to measure IAP, IAV and Cab and how certain conditions may affect the results. This review will give a concise overview of the different methods to assess and estimate Cab; it will list important conditions that may affect baseline values and suggest some therapeutic options. Abdominal compliance (Cab), defined as a measure of the ease of abdominal expansion, is measured differently than IAP. The compliance of the abdominal wall is only a part of the total abdominal pressure-volume (PV) relationship. Measurement or estimation of Cab is difficult at the bedside and can only be done in a case of change (removal or addition) in IAV. The different measurement techniques will be discussed in relation to decreases (ascites drainage, haematoma evacuation, gastric suctioning) or increases in IAV (gastric insufflation, laparoscopy with CO₂ pneumoperitoneum, peritoneal dialysis). More specific techniques using the interactions between the thoracic and abdominal compartment during positive pressure ventilation will also be discussed (low flow PV loop, respiratory IAP variations, respiratory abdominal variation test, mean IAP and abdominal pressure variation), together with the concept of the polycompartment model. The relation between IAV and IAP is linear at low IAV and becomes curvilinear and exponential at higher volumes. Specific conditions in relation to increased (previous pregnancy or laparoscopy, gynoid fat distribution, ellipse-shaped internal abdominal perimeter) or decreased Cab (obesity, fluid overload, android fat distribution, sphere-shaped internal abdominal perimeter) will be discussed as well as their impact on baseline IAV, IAP, reshaping capacity and abdominal workspace volume. Finally, we suggest possible treatment options in situations of unadapted IAV according to existing Cab, which results in high IAP. A large overlap exists between the treatment of patients with abdominal hypertension and those with low Cab. The Cab plays a key role in understanding the deleterious effects of unadapted IAV on IAP and end-organ perfusion and function. If we can identify patients with low Cab, we can anticipate and select the most appropriate surgical treatment to avoid complications such as IAH or ACS.

The impact of a positive fluid balance on morbidity and mortality has been well established. However, little is known about how to monitor fluid status and fluid overload. This narrative review summarises the recent literature and discusses the different parameters related to bio-electrical impedance analysis (BIA) and how they might be used to guide fluid management in critically ill patients. Definitions are listed for the different parameters that can be obtained with BIA; these include among others total body water (TBW), intracellular water (ICW), extracellular water (ECW), ECW/ICW ratio and volume excess (VE). BIA allows calculation of body composition and volumes by means of a current going through the body considered as a cylinder. Reproducible measurements can be obtained with tetrapolar electrodes with two current and two detection electrodes placed on hands and feet. Modern devices also apply multiple frequencies, further improving the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. Some pitfalls and conditions are discussed that need to be taken into account for correct BIA interpretation. Although BIA is a simple, noninvasive, rapid, portable, reproducible, and convenient method of measuring body composition and fluid distribution with fewer physical demands than other techniques, it is still unclear whether it is sufficiently accurate for clinical use in critically ill patients. However, the potential clinical applications are numerous. An overview regarding the use of BIA parameters in critically ill patients is given, based on the available literature. BIA seems a promising tool if performed correctly. It is non-invasive and relatively inexpensive and can be performed at bedside, and it does not expose to ionising radiation. Modern devices have very limited between-observer variations, but BIA parameters are population-specific and one must be aware of clinical situations that may interfere with the measurement such as visible oedema, nutritional status, or fluid and salt administration. BIA can help guide fluid management, resuscitation and de-resuscitation. The latter is especially important in patients not progressing spontaneously from the Ebb to the Flow phase of shock. More research is needed in critically ill patients before widespread use of BIA can be suggested in this patient population.

Objective: To determine intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and to evaluate the reproducibility of IAP-measurements using the Foley Manometer Low Volume (FMLV) in term uncomplicated pregnancies before and after caesarean section (CS), relative to two different reference points and to non-pregnant values. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Secondary level referral center for feto-maternal medicine. Population: Term uncomplicated pregnant women as the case-group and non-pregnant patients undergoing a laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) as control group. Methods: IAP was measured in 23 term pregnant patients, before and after CS and in 27 women immediately after and 1 day after LAVH. The midaxillary line was used as zero-reference (IAP(MAL)) in all patients and in 13 CS and 13 LAVH patients, the symphysis pubis (IAP(SP)) was evaluated as additional zero-reference. Intraobserver correlation (ICC) was calculated for each zero-reference. Paired student's t-tests were performed to compare IAP values and Pearson's correlation was used to assess correlations between IAP and gestational variables. Main outcome measures: ICC before and after surgery, IAP before and after CS, IAP after CS and LAVH. Results: The ICC for IAP(MAL) before CS was lower than after (0.71 versus 0.87). Both mean IAP(MAL) and IAP(SP) were significantly higher before CS than after: 14.0 +/- 2.6 mmHg versus 9.8 +/- 3.0 mmHg (p

This paper summarizes the latest definitions and terminology on acute gastrointestinal injury, intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome in the intensive care unit patients as published recently by the Working Group on Abdominal Problems (WGAP) of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) and the World Society on Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS). The uniformity created is a great step forward for the evaluation of gastrointestinal function and abdominal hypertension in the critically ill and should assist in further research.

BackgroundVariability of body weight (BW) and height calls for indexation of volumetric hemodynamic parameters. Extravascular lung water (EVLW) has formerly been indexed to actual BW (BW(act)) termed EVLW-index (EVLWI). In overweight patients indexation to BW(act) might inappropriately lower indexed EVLWI(act). Several studies suggest indexation of EVLWI to predicted BW (EVLWI(pred)). However, data regarding association of EVLWI(act) and EVLW(pred) to mortality and PaO2/FiO2 are inconsistent. Two recent studies based on biometric database-analyses suggest indexation of EVLWI to height (EVLWI(height)). Therefore, our study compared the association of un-indexed EVLW, EVLWI(height), EVLW(pred) and EVLWI(act) to PaO2/FiO2 and Oxygenation index (OI = mean airway pressure*FiO2*/PaO2).MethodsA total of 2119 triplicate transpulmonary thermodilutions (TPTDs; PiCCO; Pulsion Medical-Systems, Germany) were performed in 50 patients from the evaluation, and 181 patients from the validation groups. Correlations of EVLW and EVLWI to PaO2/FiO2, OI and ROC-AUC-analyses regarding PaO2/FiO210 were performed.ResultsIn the evaluation group, un-indexed EVLW (AUC 0.758; 95%-CI: 0.637-0.880) and EVLWI(height) (AUC 0.746; 95%-CI: 0.622-0.869) provided the largest ROC-AUCs regarding PaO2/FiO210" (0.778; 95%-CI: 0.713-0.842) compared to 0.739 (95%-CI: 0.669-0.810) for EVLWI(act) and 0.756 (95%-CI: 0.688-0.824) for EVLWI(pred).ConclusionsIndexation of EVLW to height (EVLWI(height)) improves the association of EVLW(I) to PaO2/FiO2 and OI compared to all other indexations including EVLWI(pred) and EVLWI(act). Also considering two recent biometric database analyses, EVLWI should be indexed to height.

OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence and prognosis of thrombocytopenia in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: The medical ICU of a university hospital and the combined medical-surgical ICU of a regional hospital. PATIENTS: All patients consecutively admitted during a 5-month period. INTERVENTIONS: Patient surveillance and data collection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was ICU mortality. Data of 329 patients were analyzed. Overall ICU mortality rate was 19.5%. A total of 136 patients (41.3%) had at least one platelet count 150 x 10(9)/L (p < .0005 for all comparisons). Bleeding incidence rose from 4.1% in nonthrombocytopenic patients to 21.4% in patients with minimal platelet counts between 101 x 10(9)/L and 149 x 10(9)/L (p = .0002) and to 52.6% in patients with minimal platelet counts

Gut dysfunction resulting in increased gut permeability and subsequent bacterial translocation may play an important role in the development of multiple organ system failure in the critically ill within this concept. Intra-abdominal pressure is an important parameter and prognostic indicator of the

Intraabdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) are relatively newly discovered problems in critically ill patients (1, 2), but in fact, they have been around since the early days of critical care medicine and even before. Many of us may well remember treating patients with tense, distended abdomens, after emergency abdominal surgery, or in patients suffering from diseases such as acute pancrea-titis. Many patients who eviscerated in the intensive care unit (ICU) were sent back to the operating room for fascial closure, whereas these cases of spontaneous decompression should be seen as a natural defence mechanism and a sign that the physiology of the patient was compromised. All too often, the fi nal common pathway was therapy resistant multiple organ dysfunc

Kynurenic acid (KYNA) is one of the end products of tryptophan metabolism. The aim of this study was to analyse plasma KYNA concentration in septic shock patients (SSP) with acute kidney injury (AKI) undergoing continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH). Changes in KYNA content were compared to alterations in the levels of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein and lactate. Adult SSP with AKI were examined. Measurements were conducted at seven time points: before beginning CVVH and at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after the beginning of CVVH. Based on clinical outcomes, the data were analysed separately for survivors and non-survivors. Twenty-seven patients were studied. CVVH was associated with reduced plasma KYNA concentration only in survivors. Plasma KYNA concentration correlated with the levels of lactate and PCT only in survivors. (1) CVVH reduced plasma KYNA concentration only in survivors; (2) lack of this reduction may predict fatal outcomes in SSP.