Search

Objectives: In American football, hand injuries have been shown to negatively impact performance. The purpose of this study is to characterize the prevalence and severity of hand injuries in National Football League (NFL) players., Methods: A public online database was utilized to identify hand injuries in NFL players from 2009-2010 to 2019-2020. The primary outcome was to analyze the overall incidence of hand injuries (including wrist, metacarpus, finger, and thumb), injury type by each aforementioned anatomic location, and player position. Injury severity was evaluated based on percentage of injuries in which players returned to play (RTP), number of games missed before RTP, and the percentage of injuries resulting in the player being placed on injured reserve (IR)., Results: Of the 6,127 players included, 847 (13.8%) players sustained a hand injury, of which 24.8%, 34.3%, 17.9%, and 22.9% occurred at the wrist, metacarpus, finger, and thumb, respectively. Of the injured players, 97.4% returned to play following their injury, 14.8% were put on IR, and an average of 1.7 (SD 3.3) games were missed. Quarterbacks were the most likely to sustain hand injuries at all anatomic locations. Wrist injuries were associated with the lowest RTP rate (93.3%), the most players placed on injured reserve (28.6%), and the greatest number of games missed (mean 2.5, SD 4.2)., Conclusion: Hand injuries decreased in prevalence by 65.6% over the 11 NFL seasons evaluated. This trend coincides with the implementation of several safety rules that relate to components of play involving the hands. Quarterbacks experienced the greatest prevalence and severity for all hand injuries. Wrist injuries represent the anatomic location associated with the greatest severity. These findings may be able to inform tailored injury prevention practices by position, and advocate for the further adoption of safety rules to protect players from further injury.

Background: We hypothesized that women are underrepresented among fellows of the American Orthopaedic Association (AOA) relative to their prevalence among faculty at departments of orthopaedic surgery., Methods: Clinical faculty at departments of orthopaedic surgery that are affiliated with residency training programs were analyzed for AOA membership. Participation-to-prevalence ratios (PPRs) were calculated for men and women with AOA membership relative to their prevalence among orthopaedic surgeon faculty. A PPR of <0.8 or >1.2 indicated under- or overrepresentation, respectively. PPR values between 0.8 and 1.2 indicated equivalent representation. Sex disparities in AOA membership were explored by academic rank and orthopaedic subspecialty., Results: There were 4,310 orthopaedic surgery faculty, and 998 (23.2%) had AOA membership. Overall, women formed the minority of members in the AOA study cohort (11.4%), but they had equivalent representation relative to their prevalence among faculty (10.0%, PPR = 1.14, p = 0.210). In the AOA study cohort, women were the minority at each academic rank, including assistant professor (20.2% versus 79.8%, p < 0.001), associate professor (16.8% versus 83.2%, p < 0.001), and full professor (7.0% versus 93.0%, p < 0.001). However, women had greater representation in the AOA study cohort at each academic rank than would be expected based on their prevalence among faculty, including the assistant (PPR = 1.45), associate (PPR = 1.56), and full (PPR = 1.27) professor levels. Similarly, in the AOA study cohort, women were the minority in each orthopaedic subspecialty, but were only underrepresented in pediatric orthopaedics (PPR = 0.74). Women had greater representation in the AOA study cohort than would be expected by their prevalence among faculty in hand surgery (PPR = 1.51) and orthopaedic sports medicine (PPR = 1.33). In contrast, men had equivalent representation in each orthopaedic subspecialty., Conclusions: Women form a minority group in the AOA, but they exhibit greater representation in the AOA than would be expected based on their prevalence among faculty at each academic rank, and they have greater representation than men, who exhibit equivalent representation across all academic ranks. Collectively, these results disproved our hypothesis, and suggest that women are participating in the AOA at rates that are greater than their prevalence among faculty., Clinical Relevance: Equitable participation of women in orthopaedic surgery is necessary to promote diversity and inclusion in the specialty. The AOA may be an important catalyst for future positive diversity and inclusion efforts within orthopaedic surgery., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/I123)., (Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Purpose: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) often face higher postoperative complication rates. Limited data exist regarding outcomes in T2DM patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR). This study compares complication rates between endoscopic CTR (ECTR) and open CTR (OCTR) in patients with T2DM., Methods: The TriNetX database was used to perform a retrospective cohort study of 67,225 patients with T2DM who underwent ECTR (n = 17,792) or OCTR (n = 49,433). Demographic data, medical comorbidities, and complication rates were analyzed. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to calculate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals of postoperative median nerve injury, 6-week wound dehiscence, and 6-week wound infection., Results: After matching, a significantly greater number of ECTR patients had liver disease ( P  = <.001) and a body mass index > 40 ( P  = .001) compared to the OCTR group. These patients also had a lower incidence of fluid and electrolyte disorders ( P  = .003). Patients with T2DM who underwent ECTR had a significantly lower relative risk of 6-week wound infection, 6-week wound dehiscence, and median nerve injury (all P < .001) compared to patients who underwent OCTR., Conclusions: In our analysis of T2DM patients undergoing CTR, ECTR yielded significantly lower rates of wound infection, wound dehiscence, and nerve injury within 6-weeks post-surgery, reducing the risk by 43%, 52%, and 58%, respectively. These findings suggest that ECTR may result in a lower complication rate in this patient population., Type of Study/level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: No benefits in any form have been received or will be received related directly to this article., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Introduction: The role of elective rotations in the orthopaedic residency selection process varies between programs. Our study aims to identify factors associated with residency programs that interview and match a greater proportion of applicants who have completed an elective rotation with their program., Methods: Data were collected through the American Orthopaedic Association's Orthopaedic Residency Information Network database. Bivariate correlations and multivariate regression models were used to identify independent predictors of programs with a greater proportion of interviewees or residents who completed an elective rotation at the respective program., Results: One hundred seventy-eight of the 218 existing residency programs were included in this study. Programs that offered fewer interviews and more away rotation positions per year were associated with a greater odds of its interviewees (OR = 0.36, p = 0.01; OR = 4.55, p < 0.001, respectively) and residents (OR = 0.44, p = 0.04; OR = 4.23, p < 0.001, respectively) having completed an elective rotation with the program. In addition, programs with fewer attendings (OR = 0.39, p = 0.03) and in-person interviews (OR = 3.04, p = 0.04) matched a greater proportion of their rotators. However, programs that interviewed applicants during the elective rotation were less likely to match their rotators (OR = 0.35, p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Certain program characteristics independently predict the likelihood of a program interviewing and matching their rotators. These findings may provide information for applicants and programs regarding the rotation process., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A624)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: Racial/ethnic disparities have been demonstrated across multiple orthopedic sub-specialties. There is a paucity of literature examining disparities in distal radius fracture (DRF) management., Methods: Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we analyzed 15 559 non-Hispanic (NH) White, NH Black, NH Asian, and Hispanic adults who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for DRF from 2013 to 2019. We evaluated time from hospital admission to surgery and length of stay using Poisson regression. Deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism (PE), and wound complications were reported using descriptive statistics. Thirty-day reoperation and readmission were analyzed using binary logistic regression., Results: Wait time to surgery was longer for Hispanic patients than NH White patients (incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 2.54, P < .001); this narrowed over time (IRR: 0.944, P = .047). Length of stay was longer for NH Black (IRR: 1.78, P < .001) and Hispanic patients (IRR: 1.83, P < .001), but shorter for NH Asian (IRR: 0.715, P = .019) than NH White patients; this temporally narrowed for NH Black patients (IRR: 0.908, P = .001). Deep venous thrombosis, PE, and wound complications occurred at a rate less than 0.30% across all groups. Hispanic patients were less likely to undergo reoperation than NH White patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.254, P = .003). While there was no difference in readmission between groups in the aggregated study period, NH Black patients experienced a temporal increase in readmissions relative to NH White patients (OR: 1.40, P = .038)., Conclusions: Racial and ethnic disparities exist in DRF management. Further investigation on causes for and solutions to combat these disparities in DRF care may help improve the inequities observed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: The 2022 to 2023 orthopaedic residency cycle implemented a preference signaling program (PSP), allowing applicants to send "signals" to up to 30 programs to demonstrate their genuine interest. With the conclusion of the 2022 to 2023 cycle, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze program director (PD) perceptions of the PSP after the match cycle and provide a retrospective evaluation of the effects of the PSP on the orthopaedic resident selection process., Methods: A 21-question survey was distributed to 98 PDs (32.7% response rate). Contact information was obtained from a national database., Results: Most respondents (96.9%) participated in the American Orthopaedic Association's PSP. The majority (93.7%) view preference signaling as a positive change. Most PDs (56.2%) reported a decreased number in applications received compared with previous years. Receiving a preference signal was ranked among the most important factors in resident selection, and most PDs agreed that preference signaling should be used to screen applicants (84.4%) and differentiate similar applicants (96.8%). Moreover, 65.6% of PDs indicated that they would not rank or invite applicants to interview without a signal or completion of a formal away rotation. PDs report that in the 2022 to 2023 cycle, 98.5% of applicants who matched at their program had sent a preference signal., Discussion: Preference signaling was one of the most important factors assessed during its inaugural application cycle and is anticipated to remain a key tool for screening and differentiating candidates. Applicants should strategically select signal recipients to enhance their success in the match., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Research experience is mandatory for all Orthopaedic Surgery residency programs. Although the allocation of required protected time and resources varies from program to program, the underlying importance of research remains consistent with mutual benefit to both residents and the program and faculty. Authorship and publications have become the standard metric used to evaluate academic success. This study aimed to determine if there is a correlation between the research productivity of Orthopaedic Surgery trainees and their subsequent research productivity as attending Orthopaedic Surgeons., Methods: Using the University of Mississippi Orthopaedic Residency Program Research Productivity Rank List, 30 different Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs were analyzed for the names of every graduating surgeon in their 2013 class. PubMed Central was used to screen all 156 physicians and collect all publications produced by them between 2008 and August 2022. Results were separated into two categories: Publications during training and Publications post-training., Results: As defined above, 156 Surgeons were analyzed for publications during training and post-training. The mean number of publications was 7.02 ± 17.819 post-training vs. 2.47 ± 4.313 during training, P  < 0.001. The range of publication post-training was 0-124 vs. 0-30 during training. Pearson correlation between the two groups resulted in a value of 0.654, P  < 0.001., Conclusion: Higher research productivity while training correlates to higher productivity post-training, but overall Orthopaedic surgeons produce more research after training than during. With the growing importance of research, more mentorship, time, and resources must be dedicated to research to instill and foster greater participation while in training., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Orthopaedic surgery remains a competitive surgical subspecialty with more applicants than spots each year. As a result, numerous students fail to match into these competitive positions each year with a growing number of reapplicants in consecutive application cycles. We sought to understand the socioeconomic factors at play between this growing reapplicant pool compared with first-time applicants to better understand potential discrepancies between these groups. Our hypothesis is that reapplicants would have higher socioeconomic status and have less underrepresented minority representation compared with successful first-time applicants., Methods: A retrospective review of deidentified individual orthopaedic surgery applicant data from the American Association of Medical Colleges was reviewed from 2011 to 2021. Individual demographic and application data as well as self-reported socioeconomic and parental data were analyzed using descriptive and advanced statistics., Results: Of the 12,112 applicants included in this data set, 77% were first-time applicants (61% versus 17% successfully entered into an orthopaedic surgery residency vs versus unmatched, respectively), whereas 22% were reapplicants. In successful first-time applicants, 12% identified as underrepresented minorities in medicine. The proportion of underrepresented minorities was significantly higher among unmatched first-time applicants (20%) and reapplicants (25%) ( P < 0.001). Reapplicants (mean = $83,364) and unmatched first-time applicants (mean = $80,174) had less medical school debt compared with first time applicants (mean = $101,663) ( P < 0.001). More than 21% of reapplicants were found to have parents in healthcare fields, whereas only 16% of successful first-time applicants and 15% of unsuccessful first-applicants had parents in health care ( P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Reapplicants to orthopaedic surgery residency have less educational debt and are more likely to have parental figures in a healthcare field compared with first-time applicants. This suggests the discrepancies in socioeconomic status between reapplicants and first-time applicants and the importance of providing resources for reapplicants., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Introduction: Publicly available AI language models such as ChatGPT have demonstrated utility in text generation and even problem-solving when provided with clear instructions. Amidst this transformative shift, the aim of this study is to assess ChatGPT's performance on the orthopaedic surgery in-training examination (OITE)., Methods: All 213 OITE 2021 web-based questions were retrieved from the AAOS-ResStudy website (https://www.aaos.org/education/examinations/ResStudy). Two independent reviewers copied and pasted the questions and response options into ChatGPT Plus (version 4.0) and recorded the generated answers. All media-containing questions were flagged and carefully examined. Twelve OITE media-containing questions that relied purely on images (clinical pictures, radiographs, MRIs, CT scans) and could not be rationalized from the clinical presentation were excluded. Cohen's Kappa coefficient was used to examine the agreement of ChatGPT-generated responses between reviewers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the performance (% correct) of ChatGPT Plus. The 2021 norm table was used to compare ChatGPT Plus' performance on the OITE to national orthopaedic surgery residents in that same year., Results: A total of 201 questions were evaluated by ChatGPT Plus. Excellent agreement was observed between raters for the 201 ChatGPT-generated responses, with a Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.947. 45.8% (92/201) were media-containing questions. ChatGPT had an average overall score of 61.2% (123/201). Its score was 64.2% (70/109) on non-media questions. When compared to the performance of all national orthopaedic surgery residents in 2021, ChatGPT Plus performed at the level of an average PGY3., Discussion: ChatGPT Plus is able to pass the OITE with an overall score of 61.2%, ranking at the level of a third-year orthopaedic surgery resident. It provided logical reasoning and justifications that may help residents improve their understanding of OITE cases and general orthopaedic principles. Further studies are still needed to examine their efficacy and impact on long-term learning and OITE/ABOS performance., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The primary purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of arterial line-related limb ischemia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The authors also sought to characterize and report the outcomes of patients who developed arterial line-related limb ischemia., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: A single academic tertiary referral ECMO center., Participants: Consecutive patients who were treated with ECMO over 6 years., Interventions: Use of arterial line., Measurements and Main Results: A total of 278 consecutive ECMO patients were included, with 19 (7%) patients developing arterial line-related limb ischemia during the ECMO run. Postcannulation Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.32), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (aOR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74-0.95), and adjusted Vasopressor Dose Equivalence (aOR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.05) scores were independently associated with the development of arterial line-associated limb ischemia. A SOFA score of ≥17 at the time of ECMO cannulation had an 80% sensitivity and 87% specificity for predicting arterial line-related limb ischemia., Conclusions: Arterial line-related limb ischemia is much more common in ECMO patients than in the typical intensive care unit setting. The SOFA score may be useful in identifying which patients may be at risk for arterial line-related limb ischemia. As this was a single-center retrospective study, these results are inherently exploratory, and prospective multicenter studies are necessary to validate these results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Babar Shafiq is a paid consultant for Bone Foam Inc., Smith & Nephew, and DePuy Synthes. He is on the editorial board for Frontiers in Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, and is a board/committee member for the Orthopedic Trauma Association. He also receives research support from DePuy Synthes., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The use of social media for marketing, education, and networking has increased among orthopaedic surgeons. Social media has played an important role in supporting women physicians and trainees, by allowing connections to be made across stages of training and geographic borders. The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions of female orthopaedic surgeons, fellows, residents, and medical students regarding their usage of social media., Methods: A 22-question anonymous survey regarding the perceptions of social media usage was distributed to 1,189 female members of Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society via e-mail in July 2022. Data collection lasted a total of 4 weeks, from July to August 2022. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics., Results: A total of 207 responses were received (17% response rate). The respondents comprised 90 orthopaedic surgeons (43%), 60 medical students (29%), 49 residents (24%), and eight fellows (4%). Ninety one percent of participants (189 of 207) reported having a social media account, with 23% (43 of 189) having separate 'personal' and 'professional' accounts. Less than half of all participants reported altering (51 of 189; 27%) or deleting (20 of 189; 11%) profiles for interviews. Fifty three percent of participants (109 of 207) 'agreed' that social media is a good way to network. Twenty eight percent of participants (58 of 207) feared gaining attention to their profile when engaging with professional accounts. Forty percent of participants (62 of 207) agreed that personal life events on social media can be considered unprofessional and should be kept on a private profile., Conclusion: Social media can be used to network professionally within orthopaedic surgery, connecting women at different levels of training. Although concerns about professionalism of social media accounts exist, this may be mitigated by maintaining a separate private account from a public, professional profile. Future guidelines regarding social media usage and how to maintain professionalism while being active on social media may be beneficial., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Introduction: Mentorship is an invaluable facet of medical education. The purpose of this study was to analyze medical student perspectives of mentorship they received and the influence this has on their participation in the field of orthopaedic surgery., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of medical students interested in pursuing orthopaedic surgery through an 18-question survey distributed through social media and e-mail., Results: Two hundred fifteen students completed this survey, with over 50% of students reporting that they have a mentor in orthopaedic surgery while 34% were actively seeking one. Most students found mentors through research opportunities (25%) and cold e-mails (20%). Common hurdles to mentorship were access (38%) and finding common time (30%). Peer mentorship had a higher mean satisfaction score in all domains, except facilitating matching, and there was a significant difference between groups (e.g., peer mentor versus program director; P < 0.001). Sex, race, and degree type were not significantly related to students' access to or their evaluation of mentors (P > 0.05 for all)., Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrates that medical students across the nation rely on mentorship to guide them on their path to becoming an orthopaedic surgeon., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: Preoperative anemia has been shown to be associated with complications after numerous orthopedic procedures. No studies to our knowledge have examined its impact on outcomes after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fracture (DRF). We hypothesized that patients with preoperative anemia would have increased likelihood of adverse outcomes, and likelihood would increase with severity of anemia., Methods: A total of 14 136 patients underwent ORIF for DRF over 2012-2021, identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were classified by World Health Organization criteria as nonanemic (hematocrit >36% for women, >39% for men), mildly anemic (hematocrit 33%-36% for women, 33%-39% for men), or moderately to severely anemic (hematocrit <33% for women or men). Multivariable regressions adjusted for age, sex, race, and comorbidities statistically different between anemic and nonanemic patients were used to examine the effect of anemia on postoperative outcomes., Results: Mildly anemic patients had significantly longer length of stay and were significantly more likely to experience readmission and sepsis ( P < .05 all). Moderately to severely anemic patients had significantly longer length of stay and were significantly more likely to experience readmission, postoperative transfusion, septic shock, and any adverse event ( P < .05 all)., Conclusions: Preoperative anemia is associated with increased likelihood of adverse outcomes after ORIF for DRF, and likelihood increases with severity of anemia. Surgeons should monitor patients for preoperative anemia and endeavor to identify the source of and, if safe and possible, correct the anemia preoperatively or manage and educate patients postoperatively., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint denervation is a relatively novel method for the management of osteoarthritis-associated pain by selective transection of articular nerve branches of the CMC joint. This study compared functional/patient-reported outcomes after CMC denervation with those after trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction with tendon interposition (T + LRTI) over a 2-year follow-up period. We hypothesized that the outcomes of denervation and T + LRTI would be similar over the course of the study and at the final 2-year follow-up., Methods: Adults with Eaton stage 2-4 disease, no evidence of CMC subluxation, and no history of thumb injury/surgery were included. Pain scores, brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), Kapandji score, 2-point discrimination, and grip/key/3-point pinch strength were measured at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-months after surgery. On average, T + LRTI patients underwent 7 weeks of splinting, with release to full activity at 3 months; denervation patients were placed in a soft postoperative dressing for 2 weeks, with release to full activity as tolerated at 3 weeks., Results: Thirty-three denervation and 20 T + LRTI patients were included. Preoperative characteristics were similar between both groups. Two denervation patients underwent secondary T + LRTI during the study period; one denervation patient underwent fat grafting to the CMC joint at an outside institution. Data prior to secondary surgeries were included in the analysis. The average tourniquet times (minutes) for denervation and T + LRTI were 43.5 ± 11.8 and 82.7 ± 14.2 minutes, respectively. For denervation and T + LRTI, the postoperative bMHQ scores were significantly higher than those at baseline at all time points. No significant differences were found between both groups for bMHQ, sensation, or strength measures., Conclusions: Carpometacarpal denervation is well tolerated, with shorter tourniquet times and faster return to full activity than T + LRTI. For the study cohort, the conversion rate to T + LRTI at 2 years was 9%. Both procedures demonstrated durable improvement in bMHQ compared with the preoperative state with similar long-term outcomes over 2 years of follow-up., Type of Study/level of Evidence: Therapeutic II., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Orthopaedic surgery residency programs have traditionally had less representation of underrepresented minority (URM) and female trainees compared with other medical specialties. Widespread efforts have been implemented to increase the diversity of orthopaedic surgery residency programs; however, it is not known whether URM and female applicants are increasingly likely to match as a result. Thus, we aimed to study the independent association between URM and female applicants and matching into orthopaedic surgery over the past decade., Methods: Applicant-level data from the Electronic Residency Application Service were reviewed from 2011 to 2021 with variables including demographic variables, URM status, and matriculation to an orthopaedic surgery residency program. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the likelihood of matriculating into orthopaedic surgery when controlling for number of applications, top 40 medical school status, AOA status, and MD/other degree., Results: Twelve thousand one hundred eleven applicants were identified from 2011 to 2021 with a match rate of 70% overall. Two thousand fifty-six applicants (17%) were female and 1,926 (16%) classified as URM. The total number of applications increased from 1,074 in 2011 to 1,229 in 2021. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) associated with matching among all applicants decreased from 0.75 in 2011 to 0.64 in 2021, p < 0.001, and the OR of non-URM male and female applicants also decreased (female: 0.79-0.69, p < 0.001; male: 0.78-0.65, p < 0.001). The OR of URM male applicants did not change significantly (0.57-0.55, p = 0.60). The OR for URM female applicants, however, increased significantly from 0.46 to 0.61, p < 0.001. Over the entire time frame, the odds of matching were significantly lower for URM applicants compared with non-URM applicants (both male and female)., Conclusions: Overall, the adjusted odds ratio of matching into orthopaedic surgery among female URM applicants has increased over the past decade, indicating successful efforts to improve the diversity of orthopaedic surgery training programs. The odds of URM male applicants have remained relatively constant, and the odds of URM male and female applicants were significantly lower than all non-URM applicants., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A544)., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Orthopaedic surgery has become one of the most competitive specialties to match into among medical students applying to residency. The purpose of this study was to compare match rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs among first-time vs. repeat applicants., Methods: Data were obtained from the National Resident Matching Program from 2018 to 2022. For each year, the total number of applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs was obtained, as well as the number of applicants who successfully matched into orthopaedics. The match rate was compared between first-time vs repeat applicants. A subanalysis was performed on allopathic graduates (MDs) and osteopathic graduates (DOs)/international medical graduates (IMGs). In addition, the match rate for first-time applicants and reapplicants was compared between MD and DO/IMG applicants., Results: Overall, there was a significantly higher match rate among first-time applicants (89.8%) vs. repeat applicants (22.5%, p < 0.0001). When substratified by MD and DO/IMG applicants, first-time applicants still matched at a significantly higher rate than reapplicants within each group (p < 0.0001 for each). Among first-time applicants, MDs (93.1%) matched at a significantly higher rate than DOs/IMGs (68.6%, p < 0.0001). Among reapplicants, DOs/IMGs (25.3%) matched at a significantly higher rate than MDs (20.1%, p < 0.01)., Conclusion: First-time applicants to orthopaedic surgery residency programs have a significantly higher rate of matching compared with reapplicants, irrespective of degree. In recent years, first-time MD applicants have matched at a significantly higher rate than first-time DO/IMG applicants., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: There is a paucity of research on the demographic trends of orthopedic and plastic hand surgery fellows. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the current state of racial and gender demographic trends in hand surgery fellowship from 2007 to 2021., Methods: We analyzed fellowship demographic data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education public database from 2007-2008 through 2020-2021. The gender of hand surgery fellows was categorized as male, female, or not reported and their race/ethnicity as White, Non-Hispanic; Asian or Pacific Islander, Hispanic; Black, Non-Hispanic; American Indian or Alaskan Native; other; or unknown. We extracted the number of fellows per year for each category and calculated the percentage equivalents and average percentages. We performed the chi-square test for trend (Cochran-Armitage test) to identify any significant changes in the percentages of gender and race/ethnicity between 2007 and 2021., Results: There was a significant increase in the percentage of hand surgery fellows who are women (20.7% to 30.7%) and Asian or Pacific Islander (13.3% to 25.3%). There was no significant change in the percentage of Hispanic or Black, Non-Hispanic fellows., Conclusions: Although there have been some increases, hand surgery fellows continue to be underrepresented by women and minorities, consistent with the demographic of orthopedic and plastic surgery residents. There have been increasing trends in the number of women and minorities in medical schools, which leaves room for improvement from the downstream prospective applicant pool., Clinical Relevance: The physician-patient relationship can potentially be strengthened by race and gender concordance; however, many minority and female hand surgery patients do not have physicians who are women or of the same ethnic background. Patient satisfaction, trust, and potential health outcomes may be improved with a physician workforce that reflects the diversity of their patients., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mental health conditions affect tens of millions of Americans. In recent years, particularly with the advent of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, there has been a burst of interest in mental health and mental illness among orthopaedic surgical patients. The mental health of orthopaedic surgeons themselves has also come into focus, with high reported rates of burnout and depression. The aim of this article was to evaluate trends in publication on mental health and mental illness in orthopaedic surgery., Methods: Web of Science and PubMed were queried to conduct a systematic review. Studies that discussed orthopaedic surgery and mental illnesses or mental health topics over 2001 to 2022 were included. Publications were analyzed by article-, author-, and topic-level characteristics., Results: A total of 416 studies were analyzed after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Publication volume increased dramatically, demonstrating quadratic growth over 2001 to 2022 (p < 0.001). Eighty-eight percent of studies focused on patients and 10% on surgeons, with studies about patients more likely to focus on mental illness and those about surgeons more likely to focus on mental health (p < 0.001). Twenty percent of publications had a female senior author, and 5 authors collectively accounted for 10% of all publications. Eight journals published more than 10 publications, accounting for 35% of all publications. The most productive subspecialties were arthroplasty (135, 30%), general orthopaedics (87, 21%), and spine (69, 17%). Mental illnesses that were least represented included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, eating disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and personality disorders (1% or less of total publications each)., Conclusion: This analysis showed a dramatically increasing trend in publications on mental health and mental illness in orthopaedic surgery. A high concentration of publications came from a subset of journals and senior authors, and women were overrepresented as senior authors relative to their representation in the field. The results of this analysis identified gaps in the literature, including underrepresented subspecialties, understudied mental illnesses, and study of orthopaedic surgeon mental health, and thus highlighted areas for future investigation., Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSREV/A965)., (Copyright © 2023 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.)

Objective: Improving diversity in healthcare is a widely recognized national goal. The diversity of medical student matriculants has increased, yet this trend is not seen in the composition of competitive residency programs. In this review, we examine racial and ethnic disparities in medical student grading during clinical years and explore the consequences of how this may exclude minority students from accessing competitive residency positions., Design: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and ERIC databases using variations of the terms "race," "ethnicity," "clerkship," "rotation," "grade," "evaluation", or "shelf exam." Of 391 references found using the criteria, 29 were related to clinical grading and race/ethnicity and included in the review. The GRADE criteria were used to determine the quality of evidence., Setting: Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore MD., Results: Five studies examining a total of 107,687 students from up to 113 different schools found racial minority students receive significantly fewer Honors grades in core clerkships compared to White students. Three studies examining 94,814 medical student evaluations from up to 130 different schools found significant disparities in the wording of written clerkship evaluations based on race and/or ethnicity., Conclusions: A large body of evidence suggests the presence of racial bias in subjective clinical grading and written clerkship evaluations of medical students. Grading disparities can disadvantage minority students when applying to competitive residency programs and may contribute to a lack of diversity in these fields. As low minority representation has a negative impact on patient care and research advancement, strategies to resolve this issue must be further explored., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest Lucy O'Sullivan, Whitney Kagabo, Niyathi Prasad: None, (Copyright © 2023 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Orthopaedic Residency Directors advised against visiting subinternship rotations in the peak of the pandemic. To adapt, programs offered multiple virtual experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate programs and applicants perceptions regarding the value of virtual experiences during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle and their utility in future application cycles., Methods: A survey was disseminated to 31 residency programs gathering data about virtual experiences offered in this cycle. A second survey was disseminated to interns who have successfully matched at those programs to identify how interns think to have benefited from the experiences., Results: Twenty-eight programs completed the survey (90% response rate). One hundred eight new interns completed the survey (70% response rate). Virtual information sessions and resident socials were the highest attended (94% and 92%, respectively). Interns and leadership agreed that virtual rotations provided students with a good understanding of program culture and what the programs offer educationally. Neither the leadership nor the interns would recommend replacing in-person aways with virtual experiences., Conclusion: Virtual experiences helped bridge the gap after away rotations were canceled. Alongside in-person aways, virtual experiences are likely to play a role in future cycles. However, virtual experiences remain incomparable to in-person away rotations and are not recommended as a replacement., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Redisplacement and subsequent intervention are common for pediatric forearm fractures. We investigated associations between the success of closed reduction and the treating provider's experience. We identified patients aged 4-16 years with forearm fractures treated by closed reduction and cast immobilization. Clinical data and radiographs of 130 patients treated by 30 residents were reviewed to determine the treating resident's pediatric forearm fracture reduction experience and the incidence of initial treatment failure (ITF). ITF was defined as subsequent intervention before union or malunion. ITF occurred in 32 of 130 patients (25%), comprising 12 of 23 patients (52%) treated by residents with no previous experience and 20 of 107 patients (19%) treated by residents who had logged ≥ 1 previous reduction (odds ratio, 4.7). ITF was more likely to occur in pediatric forearm fractures treated by residents with no previous forearm reduction experience compared with those performed by residents who had such experience. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(1):032-035, 2023).

Greater faculty diversity within orthopaedic residency programs has been associated with an increased application rate from students of similarly diverse demographic backgrounds. It is unknown whether these underrepresented student populations have an equitable likelihood of being highly ranked and matching at these programs. Thus, we sought to evaluate the relationship between faculty and resident diversity, with a specific focus on sex, racial/ethnic groups that are underrepresented in medicine (URiM), and international medical graduates (IMGs)., Methods: The American Orthopaedic Association's Orthopaedic Residency Information Network database was used to collect demographic data on 172 US residency programs. Linear regression analyses were performed to determine the relationship between the proportion of female or URiM attendings at a program and the proportion of female, URiM, or IMG residents or top-ranked applicants (≥25 rank). URiM was defined as "racial and ethnic populations that are underrepresented in the medical profession relative to their numbers in the general population.", Results: A mean of 13.55% of attendings were female and 14.14% were URiM. A larger fraction of female attendings was a positive predictor of female residents (p < 0.001). Similarly, a larger percentage of URiM attendings was a positive predictor of URiM residents (p < 0.001), as well as of URiM (p < 0.001) and IMG (p < 0.01) students being ranked highly. There was no significant association between URiM attendings and female residents/overall top-ranked applicants, or vice versa., Conclusions: Residency programs with more female attendings were more likely to match female residents, and programs with more URiM attendings were more likely to highly rank URiM and IMG applicants as well as match URiM residents. Our findings indicate that orthopaedic surgery residencies may be more likely to rank and match female or URiM students at similar proportions to that of their faculty. This may reflect minority students preferentially applying to programs with more diverse faculty because they feel a better sense of fit and are likely to benefit from a stronger support system., Level of Evidence: III., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A449)., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Orthopedic surgeons commonly perform corticosteroid injections. These injections have systemic side effects, including suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal axis. Due to this suppression, there is a theoretical risk of corticosteroid injections affecting the efficacy of the novel COVID-19 vaccines. This potential interaction led the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons to recommend, "avoiding musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections for two weeks before and one week after COVID vaccine administration." This review examines the literature underlying this recommendation. An extensive literature review was performed through PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from database inception to May 2022. Keywords searched were COVID, coronavirus, vaccine, vaccination, steroids, and corticosteroids. Search results included articles written in the English language and encompassed reviews, case series, empirical studies, and basic science articles. There is no definitive evidence that corticosteroid injections affect COVID-19 vaccine efficacy or increase the risk of contracting COVID. The authors recommend orthopedic surgeons follow the AAOS guidelines, which recommend avoiding injections two weeks before and one week following COVID vaccine administration. Additional research is needed to better define this theoretical risk, especially since there is good evidence that injections suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis., Competing Interests: The authors do NOT have any potential conflicts of interest for this manuscript.

It is important to educate and equip the orthopaedic community with tools to address health care disparities and improve orthopaedic specialty recruitment for racial minorities. How patients and providers are affected by systemic racism in healthcare and what that means in orthopaedic surgery, methods to identify bias and improve access to orthopaedic care for racial minorities, and how to structure a program and department environment to encourage and promote diversity are important topics of discussion.

In May 2022, the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) published guidelines regarding interviews for the 2022-2023 residency application cycle. These guidelines recommended virtual interviews and discouraged "hybrid" interviewing. We conducted a survey of orthopaedic program directors (PDs) to understand their perspectives on these new guidelines and their plans for the upcoming cycle., Methods: A 19-question multicenter, cross-sectional research survey was emailed to 98 PDs (38.8% response rate) through Qualtrics XM. Contact information was obtained from a public national database., Results: Most orthopaedic residency programs (60.5%) were planning on conducting in-person interviews before any AAMC and hospital guidelines, and most (65.8%) will likely be conducting virtual interviews post-guidelines. PDs voiced mixed opinions about virtual interviews (39.4% in favor vs. 47.4% against). PDs were also split on whether forgoing the AAMC guidance would be irresponsible for residency programs (47.4% believe it would be irresponsible vs. 44.8% believe it would not); however, a plurality are in favor of the AAMC's guidance (42.1%). Furthermore, PDs agreed that virtual interviews have disadvantages including favoring top-tier applicants, students from home institutions, and in-person rotators, making ranking applicants and learning about a program's culture more difficult. Most PDs (84.2%) felt that hybrid interviews would disadvantage applicants who would choose the virtual option., Conclusion: AAMC guidance seems to be influencing how most orthopaedic surgery programs will conduct residency interviews for the 2022-2023 cycle. Most PDs agreed with the AAMC guidelines but voiced concerns regarding several disadvantages for all 3 proposed interview options (virtual, in-person, and hybrid). Our results indicate that the recent AAMC guidelines may have contributed to a shift in opinions among PDs but are not sufficient to create a consensus on the best practices for residency interviews. Our findings should encourage solutions focused on the deeper systemic issues within the orthopaedic application process in the post-coronavirus 2019 pandemic era., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A441)., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Orthopaedic surgery is currently the least diverse medical specialty, and there is little research on the mentorship needs for women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) in orthopaedics. The purpose of this study was to examine the roles and functions of mentorship for women and URMs in orthopaedic surgery, to understand mentorship preferences, and to elucidate barriers to mentorship in orthopaedic surgery., Methods: Members of J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society and Ruth Jackson Orthopaedic Society were invited to participate. An email with an anonymous link to the survey was distributed; the survey was open for responses from September 2020 through February 2021. The survey contained free-response and quantitative items about mentorship and its impact on current activities, career path, and ways to improve mentorship. Descriptive statistics, 1-way analysis of variance, frequencies, and Fisher exact test were used to analyze survey data. Qualitative data were deidentified and analyzed using thematic analysis techniques., Results: A total of 155 participants responded to the survey, of those, 151 (98%) met criteria for analysis. Sixty-four percent of participants were women, 15% identified as Black, 4% identified as Hispanic, and 9% identified as multiracial. Eighty-five percent of respondents had a mentor in orthopaedic surgery. Mentorship was often cited as useful for exposure to role models and skills development. Medical students were most likely to consider gender concordance with their mentor important. URM respondents reported greater importance of sharing race/ethnicity with their mentor (p = 0.005). In qualitative responses, participants commented on identity-specific challenges to mentorship, lack of time and institutional support for mentorship, and the disproportionate burden of mentorship on women and URMs., Conclusions: Mentorship was highly valued among women and URMs in orthopaedic surgery across all career stages. Mentorship attracted students to orthopaedic surgery and allowed residents and surgeons to progress in the field. Sharing racial/ethnic identity in mentor-mentee relationships was important to both trainees and practicing surgeons., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the 2021 orthopaedic surgery residency match outcomes. Because in-person away rotations and interviews were canceled during the 2020 to 2021 application cycle, we hypothesized that applicants would match at their home program at a higher rate in 2021 than in previous years., Methods: We queried allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency websites and social media accounts for names of residents and medical school information for cohorts matching from 2017 through 2021. To assess availability of and participation in virtual away rotations, we administered a survey to Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited allopathic orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The primary outcome was the annual proportion of applicants matching at the program affiliated with their medical school ("home program"). Subgroup analyses were stratified by Doximity reputation ranking and availability of a virtual away rotation., Results: We identified 2,632 residents who matched between 2017 and 2020 and 698 residents who matched in 2021. Overall home program match rate and likelihood of home matching were higher in 2021 compared with 2017 to 2020 (28% vs. 20%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-1.82, p < 0.001). The increase in the home match rate at programs ranked in the top 30 (27% vs. 20%, p = 0.034) was similar to the increase at programs ranked outside the top 30 (28% vs. 20%, p < 0.001). Of the 66 (48%) programs that responded to the survey, 16 (24%) offered a virtual away rotation. Programs with a higher Doximity ranking were more likely than lower-ranked programs to offer a virtual away rotation (OR = 6.75, 95% CI 1.95-23.4, p = 0.003). Home match rates did not differ significantly between programs that offered a virtual away rotation and those that did not (26% vs. 32%, p = 0.271)., Conclusions: A higher proportion of orthopaedic surgery residency applicants matched at their home program in 2021 compared with previous years. Limitations on in-person activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to this rise., Level of Evidence: N/A., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A420)., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G971 ).

Objective: Effective education of orthopedic residents requires an understanding of how they process information. To date however no literature has described resident learning styles based on the updated Kolb Learning Style Inventory (KLSI) v4.0. The purpose of this study is to identify common learning styles amongst orthopedic residents and attendings and evaluate the effect that race, gender, and resident/attending status have on learning styles., Design: The KLSI v4.0 and a demographic survey were distributed to 103 orthopedic attendings and residents at two academic centers during the 2019 to 2020 academic year. Frequencies and descriptive statistics were reported. Learning styles based on gender, race, attending versus resident status, and institution were evaluated. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant., Setting: This is a multi-center study performed at two academic, university based orthopedic surgery departments., Participants: Orthopaedic surgery residents and attending surgeons., Results: At both institutions, the combined response rate for the KLSI v4.0 was 66% and 68% for the demographic surgery. The three most common learning styles recorded were: Deciding (26.5%), Acting (17.6%), and Thinking (17.6%). Learning styles were compared by gender, race, attending and/or resident status, and institution with no statistically significant difference found between any of the comparisons (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: The majority of orthopedic surgeons have Deciding, Acting, or Thinking learning styles, which are categorized by motivation to achieve goals, disciplined and logical reasoning, and the use of theories and models to solve problems. However, not all residents and attendings utilize these common learning styles. A mismatch in learning styles between residents and attendings could result in poor educational experiences. Understanding the learning styles of orthopedic surgeons has implications for improving evaluation interpretation, mentorship pairing, quality of life, and resident remediation., (Copyright © 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, medical education and residency application have faced unprecedented changes. This has forced residency directors to alter their selection criteria in the absence of away rotations and the implementation of nationwide virtual interviews., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess how residency directors have adapted their selection criteria in light of this unique application cycle and to look at the effect, and future, of the different changes., Methods: A 16-question online survey was disseminated to 31 residency programs gathering data about new opportunities offered this cycle, changes to selection criteria, match outcomes, as well as the number of applicants to their program., Results: Twenty-nine respondents completed the survey (94% response rate). There was a significant rise in the number of applications received by programs this cycle (p < 0.05). Programs have unanimously altered their selection processes. The biggest changes in selection criteria were putting more weight into communication from mentors, emails from the applicants, home applicant status, and virtual information session attendance. Some programs used additional application requirements beyond Electronic Residency Application Service, which were often uncompleted, and cut the number of eligible applications by up to 46%. Among the new opportunities offered this cycle, virtual information sessions and social media platforms seem to be the most commonly offered and are anticipated to grow., Discussion and Conclusion: Orthopaedic surgery residency continues to become more competitive with a significant rise in the number of applications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Amid this increasingly demanding virtual application cycle, a holistic application review was more challenging. More weight was put that cycle into communication from faculty mentors, emails from the applicants, home applicant status, and virtual information session attendance. Supplementary applications and virtual informative opportunities are likely to last and change the future of the orthopaedic surgery residency application process., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between orthopaedic trainees using various preoperative training platforms (physical simulation [PS], virtual reality [VR], and reading/videos) in a slipped capital femoral epiphysis model., Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: (1) reading/video control group (n = 7), (2) VR group (n = 7), or (3) PS group (n = 7). Participants in the VR group completed a VR slipped capital femoral epiphysis module while participants in the PS group practiced the placement of a screw in the physical module before evaluation of percutaneous screw placement in the PS model. Outcomes evaluated included overall surgical time, amount of fluoroscopy, Global Rating Scale score, radiographic screw position, physical screw accuracy, presence of breeching of the articular surface or femoral neck, and overall platform rating (0 to 10)., Results: No difference was observed in surgical time, Global Rating Scale score, radiographic or physical accuracy of screw position, or articular surface breaching between the groups. Subjectively, there was a difference in utility of platform rating between the groups (PS: 10 ± 0, VR: 7 ± 2, and control: 6 ± 1, P = 0.001)., Conclusion: Training with VR was subjectively rated higher in value compared with reading/video methods and had similar performance outcomes compared with training with PS., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

As the competitiveness of orthopaedic surgery residency increases, we sought to determine whether program and Program Director (PD) characteristics influence candidate selection. This novel 19-question survey reviews PDs' opinions and practices in resident selection. Response rate was 31% (63/203). Performance during orthopaedic rotations, United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores, and clerkship honors were the top three ranked criteria, with USMLE scores used to screen candidates for interviews (70%) and rotations (43%). PDs practicing < 10 years felt USMLE scores reflect resident quality, while those practicing >10 years felt they reflect ability to pass the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery exam. Most (81%) accept applicants with low scores. PDs > 66 years old emphasized academic honors and Dean's letters, PDs 46-55 emphasized conscientiousness, and PDs practicing >21 years emphasized dexterity. PD demographics such as age, time in practice, and geographic location affect how they approach candidate selection. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(1):042-047, 2022).

Objective: This study examines the role of electronic learning platforms for medical knowledge acquisition in orthopedic surgery residency training. This study hypothesizes that all methods of medical knowledge acquisition will achieve similar levels of improvement in medical knowledge as measured by change in orthopedic in-training examination (OITE) percentile scores. Our secondary hypothesis is that residents will equally value all study resources for usefulness in acquisition of medical knowledge, preparation for the OITE, and preparation for surgical practice., Design: 9 ACGME accredited orthopedic surgery programs participated with 95% survey completion rate. Survey ranked sources of medical knowledge acquisition and study habits for OITE preparation. Survey results were compared to OITE percentile rank scores., Participants: 386 orthopedic surgery residents SETTING: 9 ACGME accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs RESULTS: 82% of participants were utilizing online learning resources (Orthobullets, ResStudy, or JBJS Clinical Classroom) as primary sources of learning. All primary resources showed a primary positive change in OITE score from 2018 to 2019. No specific primary source improved performance more than any other sources. JBJS clinical classroom rated highest for improved medical knowledge and becoming a better surgeon while journal reading was rated highest for OITE preparation. Orthopedic surgery residents' expectation for OITE performance on the 2019 examination was a statistically significant predictor of their change (decrease, stay the same, improve) in OITE percentile scores (p<0.001)., Conclusions: Our results showed that no specific preferred study source outperformed other sources. Significantly 82% of residents listed an online learning platform as their primary source which is a significant shift over the last decade. Further investigation into effectiveness of methodologies for electronic learning platforms in medical knowledge acquisition and in improving surgical competency is warranted., (Copyright © 2021 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The goal of this study was to assess the influence of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the orthopaedic surgery residency application process in the 2020 to 2021 application cycle., Methods: A survey was administered to the program directors of 152 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs. The following questions were assessed: virtual rotations, open houses/meet and greet events, social media, the selection criteria of applicants, the number of applications received by programs, and the number of interviews offered by programs., Results: Seventy-eight (51%) orthopaedic residency programs responded to the survey. Of those, 25 (32%) offered a virtual away rotation, and 57 (75%) held virtual open houses or meet and greet events. Thirteen of these programs (52%) reported virtual rotations as either "extremely important" or "very important." A 355% increase was observed in social media utilization by residency programs between the 2019 to 2020 and 2020 to 2021 application cycles, with more programs finding social media to be "extremely helpful" or "very helpful" for recruiting applicants in 2020 to 2021 compared with the previous year (39% versus 10%, P < 0.001)., Conclusion: Although many of the changes seen in the 2020 to 2021 application cycle were implemented by necessity, some of these changes were beneficial and may continue to be used in future application cycles., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Background: It has been postulated that the process of-and stresses associated with-medical training may cause a loss of empathy among trainees. Because empathy is considered an important value for clinicians and may even be associated with better patient outcomes, we assessed the empathy of orthopaedic surgery trainees and identified factors associated with empathy., Methods: Between June and September 2020, an anonymous survey was distributed electronically to trainees in 23 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs via the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. The survey comprised the validated Short-Form 8-Item Empathy Quotient (EQ-8) questionnaire-scored on a scale of 0, least empathetic, to 16, most empathetic-and single-item measure of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization derived from the Maslach Burnout Index-scored using a frequency scale. In total, 438 of 605 (72%) trainees completed the survey. The scores were compared via one-way analysis of variance, with Bonferroni correction and Tukey post-hoc testing, α = 0.05., Results: The mean (±SD) EQ-8 score among respondents was 11.3 ± 3.3. Women scored significantly higher (mean, 12.2 ± 2.8) than men (mean, 11.2 ± 3.3) (p = 0.02). Mean scores were significantly higher for trainees planning on a career in academic medicine (12.0 ± 2.9) than those intending to pursue private practice (10.9 ± 3.3) or those with a military commitment (10.4 ± 3.4) (p = 0.01). An inverse relationship was found between EQ-8 scores and single-item Maslach Burnout Index measures in depersonalization and emotional exhaustion (both, p < 0.01). No significant differences were found in EQ-8 scores across postgraduate year, program location, primary training setting, intended fellowship, relationship status, or whether they reported having children., Conclusions: We found no association between postgraduate year and EQ-8 score. Women and those intending to pursue a career in academic medicine had significantly higher levels of empathy. A significant inverse relationship was found between burnout and empathy. Respondents with higher levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization had lower levels of empathy., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A305)., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: This article will describe the development of a low-cost 3D-printed medical phantom of the arm with a distal radius fracture (DRF) to facilitate training of reduction and splinting techniques. The phantom incorporates tactile responses and visual stimuli from fluoroscopy to assist skill acquisition in a clinical setting. This provides feedback to trainees to help them develop competency and knowledge before providing care to patients., Methods: Phantoms were developed through advice and feedback from fellowship-trained hand surgeons and orthopaedic senior and junior residents. Phantoms were then pilot tested during a surgical skills examination, with residents having minimal previous exposure to distal radial reduction techniques. Residents were evaluated on procedure speed and accuracy by attending surgeons using the objective structured assessment of technical skills. Residents then completed a written knowledge examination about relevant requirements of DRF management and feedback on their opinion of the exercise using the Likert scale., Results: Residents who passed the hands-on examination also scored higher on the written examination. All residents reported that the phantom was beneficial and motivating as part of their overall training., Discussion: Real-time feedback using a phantom limb and fluoroscopic imaging, in conjunction with guidance from surgeons, allows residents to learn and practice DRF reduction and splinting techniques. These educational exercises are relatively low-cost and remove the risk of potential harm to patients during early skill acquisition. This training method may be a predictor of surgical performance in addition to providing assessment of background knowledge. Additional training sessions will be required to determine the effect of repeat exposure to residents' proficiency and comprehension., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Objective: Little is known about the importance of an applicant's research productivity in terms of matching into a highly-ranked orthopaedic residency. We characterized the research of orthopaedic residents who matched in 2017 to determine whether 1) program tiers differed by their residents' research; and 2) discrete increases in applicants' research were associated with matching into higher-ranked programs., Design: We searched Scopus for resident publications accepted before 2017 or published through January 2017. Using an established ranking system, programs were ranked (tier-1, highest; tier-5, lowest) by their department's number of citations from 2005 to 2015. We compared resident research productivity among these 5 tiers. We then categorized residents by discrete levels of research productivity (0, 1, or ≥2 publications) and compared the differences in matched program rank., Setting: Data collection and analysis performed at Johns Hopkins Hospital, a tertiary care center in Baltimore, MD., Participants: We obtained our sample from allopathic orthopaedic program websites, excluding military programs and international students, for a total of 111 programs (565 of 726 matched residents [78%])., Results: Tier-1 and tier-2 programs differed significantly in their residents' publications, h-index, and citations. Programs of other tiers did not differ significantly. Applicants with 1 publication matched to higher-ranked residency programs than those with 0 publications. When comparing residents with 1 publication versus residents with more than 1 publication, we found no significant differences in program rank matched., Conclusions: Our results suggest that higher-tier orthopaedic residency programs match residents with greater research productivity than do lower-tier programs. Having 1 publication was associated with matching into a higher-ranked program but no significant associations were observed beyond the first publication., (Copyright © 2020 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Surgical Training and Educational Platform (STEP) was developed by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) as a cost-effective set of surgical simulation modules designed to assess critical skills in hand surgery. Previous study demonstrated that STEP can differentiate between novice trainees and board-certified, certificate of added qualification hand surgeons. The purpose of this study was to assess construct validity of STEP by testing its ability to differentiate psychomotor skill level among intermediate trainees., Methods: We evaluated 30 residents from 2 orthopaedic residency programs on 8 modules: (1) lag screw fixation, (2) depth of plunge during bicortical drilling, (3) flexor tendon repair, (4) phalangeal fracture pinning, (5) central axis scaphoid fixation, (6) full-thickness skin graft harvest, (7) microsurgery, and (8) wrist arthroscopy. Spearman correlation was used to correlate total and task-specific scores to case log numbers, months in training, and number of hand surgery rotations., Results: Senior residents had significantly higher mean number of total cases in their total case log (mean difference 96.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 67.5-124.8, p < 0.01) and number of task-specific cases. Moderate correlation was observed between case log numbers and scaphoid fixation score (rs = 0.423, 95% CI 0.07-0.69) and total score (rs = 0.584, 95% CI 0.25-0.79). Moderate correlation was observed between months in training with: scaphoid fixation (rs = 0.377, 95% CI 0.01-0.66) and microsurgery (rs = 0.483, 95% CI 0.13-0.73); strong correlation was seen with total score (rs = 0.656, 95% CI 0.35-0.83). Moderate correlation with number of hand surgery rotations was observed with tendon repair (rs = 0.362, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.65), skin graft (rs = 0.385, 95% CI 0.01-0.66), wrist arthroscopy (rs = 0.391, 95% CI 0.02-0.67), microsurgery (rs = 0.461, 95% CI 0.10-0.71), and scaphoid fixation (rs = 0.578, 95% CI 0.25-0.79); and strong correlation was seen with total score (rs = 0.670, 95% CI 0.37-0.84)., Discussion/conclusion: The STEP is a validated ASSH education tool that provides a cost-effective simulation for the assessment of fundamental psychomotor skills in hand surgery. Total STEP score correlated with total task-related case volumes as well as months in training and number of hand rotations. Scoring could be modified to improve the fidelity of assessing surgical performance. And, while both time and human resource consuming to perform, administer, and score, this study demonstrates construct validity of STEP in assessing the progression of surgical skill through residency., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJSOA/A251)., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To analyze graduating U.S. orthopaedic resident case logs to determine temporal trends in knee and shoulder arthroscopic case volumes, as well as changes in the variability of caseload volumes since the implementation of Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) minimum case requirements ("case minimums") in 2013., Methods: We abstracted ACGME-published case log data for all U.S. orthopaedic surgery residents who graduated from 2007 to 2013 (before implementation of case minimums) and from 2014 to 2019 (after implementation). Using a case-control study design, we compared mean numbers of arthroscopic knee and shoulder cases reported per resident between the 2 time periods by using unpaired 2-tailed t tests. P values < .05 were considered significant., Results: The mean number of arthroscopy knee cases reported by residents decreased from 164 before implementation of case minimums to 107 after implementation ( P < .001). The mean number of shoulder cases decreased similarly from 98 to 66 ( P < .001). Among residents with caseload volumes in the 90th percentile ("high-volume caseloads") the decrease was greatest, with 38% fewer knee cases and 41% fewer shoulder cases logged. The ratio of the number of cases in the 90th percentile of caseload to the number in the 10th percentile decreased significantly after implementation of case minimums ( P < .001)., Conclusions: After implementation of ACGME case minimums in 2013, the numbers of arthroscopic knee and shoulder cases reported by graduating U.S. orthopaedic surgery residents decreased significantly. The disparity between the number of cases that constitutes a high-volume caseload and the number that constitutes a low-volume caseload narrowed, suggesting greater uniformity in resident exposure to these procedures across training programs., Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study., (© 2020 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and evaluate the effectiveness of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Behavior Tool (ABOSBT) for measuring professionalism., Methods: Through collaboration between the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery and American Orthopaedic Association's Council of Residency Directors, 18 residency programs piloted the use of the ABOSBT. Residents requested assessments from faculty at the end of their clinical rotations, and a 360° request was performed near the end of the academic year. Program Directors (PDs) rated individual resident professionalism (based on historical observation) at the outset of the study, for comparison to the ABOSBT results., Results: Nine thousand eight hundred ninety-two evaluations were completed using the ABOSBT for 449 different residents by 1,012 evaluators. 97.6% of all evaluations were scored level 4 or 5 (high levels of professional behavior) across all of the 5 domains. In total, 2.4% of all evaluations scored level 3 or below reflecting poorer performance. Of 431 residents, the ABOSBT identified 26 of 32 residents who were low performers (2 or more < level 3 scores in a domain) and who also scored "below expectations" by the PD at the start of the pilot project (81% sensitivity and 57% specificity), including 13 of these residents scoring poorly in all 5 domains. Evaluators found the ABOSBT was easy to use (96%) and that it was an effective tool to assess resident professional behavior (81%)., Conclusions: The ABOSBT was able to identify 2.4% low score evaluations (

Objective: To describe the modified operational plan we implemented for residents and faculty in our orthopedic surgery department to allow continuation of resident education and other core activities during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic., Design: Description of educational augmentation and programming modifications., Setting: The Johns Hopkins Hospital and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD., Participants: Residents and faculty, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery., Methods: In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed and implemented a modified operational schedule and remote curriculum in the orthopedic surgery department of our health system. Our plan was guided by the following principles: protecting the workforce while providing essential clinical care; maintaining continuity of education and research; and promoting social distancing while minimizing the impact on team psychosocial well-being., Results: The operational schedule and remote curriculum have been implemented successfully and allow resident education and other core departmental functions to continue as our health care system responds to the pandemic., Conclusions: We have been proactive and deliberate in implementing these operational changes, without compromise of our workforce. This experience provides residents exposure to real-life systems-based practice. We hope that our early experience will provide a framework for other surgical residency programs facing this crisis., (Copyright © 2020 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of left-handedness on orthopaedic surgeons and trainees has not been well described. We investigated the prevalence and perceived impact of left-handedness among orthopaedic surgeons and trainees., Methods: We distributed a survey regarding handedness to active members of the American Orthopaedic Association and the Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors affiliates, including department chairs, program directors, and residency and fellowship program coordinators. Program coordinators were asked to distribute the survey to their current residents and fellows., Results: Of 510 survey respondents, 78 (15%) were identified as left hand dominant (LHD). Regarding scalpel/cautery use, 64% of LHD respondents reported using their left hand primarily and 10% reported using their right hand primarily; 26% of LHD respondents described themselves as ambidextrous in scalpel/cautery use, compared with 4.7% of right hand dominant (RHD) respondents (p < 0.001). Regarding suturing, 53% of LHD respondents reported using their left hand primarily and 38% reported using their right hand primarily; 9.0% of LHD respondents described themselves as ambidextrous when suturing, compared with 1.9% of RHD respondents (p = 0.012). Only 5.1% of LHD respondents reported having received laterality-specific psychomotor training, whereas 17% perceived a need for such training during residency; RHD respondents reported similar rates. Ambidexterity in scalpel/cautery use or suturing among LHD respondents was not associated with the perception that their left-handedness was advantageous. LHD attending surgeons were more likely than LHD trainees to perceive their handedness as advantageous (p = 0.007)., Conclusions: Fifteen percent of orthopaedic surgeons and trainees who responded to our survey were LHD. LHD respondents reported significantly higher rates of ambidexterity in both scalpel/cautery use and suturing compared with RHD respondents. Ambidexterity was not associated with a self-perception that left-handedness was advantageous. LHD-attending surgeons were significantly more likely than LHD residents/fellows to perceive their left-handedness as advantageous. There may be benefits to pairing LHD residents with LHD faculty surgeons early in their training to provide mentorship and insight regarding performing surgical procedures left handed., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores can quantify symptoms and limitations after upper extremity surgery. Our objective was to determine how these scores compare amongst patients with trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis treated either nonoperatively or operatively., Methods: In this retrospective comparative study, we compared PROMIS scores (upper extremity function [UEF], pain interference, and depression) between 43 patients who underwent nonoperative treatment (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/splinting/injections) and 33 patients who underwent trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (minimum 6-month recovery period) by 4 surgeons from 2014-2018. PROMIS scores were compared across all patients by Eaton-Littler staging. We used linear regression to assess correlations between time-since-surgery and each PROMIS domain. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify patient and disease factors independently associated with PROMIS scores., Results: Surgery was not associated with better UEF (37 vs. 40, P=0.23 ), less pain interference (58 vs. 56, P=0.42 ), or fewer symptoms of depression (47 vs. 46, P=0.59 ). Similarly, no differences were observed across all patient by Eaton-Littler stage for UEF ( P=0.49 ), pain ( P =0.48), or depression ( P=0.90 ). For the operative group, greater time-since-surgery, or patient recovery period, correlated moderately with worse UEF (R=0.41) and increased pain (R=0.37)., Conclusion: In small retrospective comparative cohorts, surgery was not associated with better UEF, pain, or depression scores compared with nonoperative treatment for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis.

Objective: Pediatrics and hand surgery have historically been the orthopaedic subspecialties with the highest female representations. We sought to identify the gender distribution of orthopedic surgical faculty by subspecialty, geography, and educational background. We hypothesized that the proportion of women entering pediatric orthopaedics has decreased since 1980., Design: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education was used to generate a list of U.S. orthopedic residencies. Program websites were used to collect data regarding each faculty member's gender, residencies, fellowships, and graduation year. t tests were used to compare quantitative data and Fisher's exact tests to compare categorical data. Significance was defined as p < 0.05., Setting: Publicly available data from official websites of U.S. orthopedic residencies., Participants: Of 153 residencies, 142 (93%) had accessible faculty lists., Results: Of 3596 orthopedic surgeons, 7.9% were women. Among fellowship-trained faculty, 22% of pediatric orthopedists were women compared with 7.6% of faculty in other orthopedic subspecialties (p < 0.00001). There was a significantly higher percentage of female faculty in the West (13%) than in any other U.S. census region (p < 0.001 vs. Midwest, vs. South, and vs. Northeast). A strong correlation with time was found in number of women completing fellowships other than hand or pediatrics from 1980 to 2014 (R 2  = 0.95); a strong inverse correlation with time was found for pediatrics as a percentage of fellowships completed by women during the same period (R 2  = 0.94)., Conclusions: Although pediatrics remains the most popular fellowship for female orthopedists, women who enter academic orthopedics are increasingly choosing nonpediatric subspecialties., (Copyright © 2019 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is a high demand for shoulder/elbow experience among hand-fellowship trainees due to the perception that this exposure will improve their professional "marketability" in a subspecialty they perceive as having higher compensation., Methods: Using Medicare data, we investigated the most common surgeries from these fields and determined which have the highest compensation [work relative value unit (wRVU), payment, charge, and reimbursement (payment-to-charge percentage] rates per operative time. We then determined whether the overall non-weighted and weighted (by surgical frequency/volume) compensation rates of shoulder/elbow surgery are greater than that of hand surgery., Results: Among 30 shoulder/elbow procedures, arthroplasty and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair had the highest payment and wRVU assignments. Among 83 hand procedures, upper-extremity flaps, carpal stabilization, distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), both-bone ORIF, and interposition arthroplasty had the greatest wRVU assignments with correspondingly high payments. A non-weighted comparison of the two subspecialties showed that hand surgery has a higher mean payment/min ($10.46±3.22 vs. $7.52±2.89), charge/min ($51.02±17.11 vs. $41.96±11.32), and reimbursement (21±4.7% vs. 18±5.1%) compared with shoulder/elbow surgery (all, P<0.01 ). Non-weighted mean wRVUs/min were similar (0.12±0.03 vs. 0.13±0.03, P = 0.12 ). When weighted by procedure frequency, hand surgery had greater wRVUs/min (0.15±0.036 vs. 0.13±0.032), payments/min ($14.17±4.50 vs. $6.97±2.26), charges/min ($75.68±30.47 vs. $42.61±7.83), and reimbursement (20±5.0% vs. 17±6.0%) (all, P<0.01 )., Conclusion: According to Medicare compensation, and when weighted by procedure frequency, hand procedures are associated with greater overall mean wRVUs/min, payments/min, charges/min, and reimbursement compared with shoulder and elbow procedures. Hand-surgery fellowship applicants should be aware that subspecialty compensation is complex in nature but should seek shoulder/elbow elective experience to acquire an additional surgical skill-set as opposed to primarily monetary reason.

Orthopaedic resident educators confront many important issues. This may be the most challenging time yet for orthopaedic education. A survey of program directors and chairs aimed to identify the major challenges in orthopaedic education. Many issues were identified, and the following four major themes emerged: (1) loss of professionalism, (2) too much emphasis on procedures, (3) lack of clinical experience, and (4) challenges with external oversight. Professionalism in taking care of patients may be compromised by work-hour limitations and affected by generational differences. Limitations to progressive, graduated responsibility include internal and external factors, resulting in a lack of opportunity. Overemphasis on case volume fosters a training environment where technical skill is seen as most important and can detract from teaching the basic principles of being a doctor, including shared decision making. This paper explores these major challenges to orthopaedic resident education in 2018. Substantial changes will be required to address these challenges, but better understanding of the issues they face should help educators identify, minimize, or ideally avoid threats to optimal resident education.

Objective: Orthopedic surgeons are the third-highest opioid prescribers in the United States. Their prescribing practices can significantly affect the quantity of unconsumed opioids available to fuel the current opioid epidemic. The aim of this study was to identify prescribing patterns and knowledge gaps among orthopedic providers for targeted future interventions and investigation., Design: An online survey describing six common orthopedic surgical scenarios was distributed electronically to determine opioid type and quantity prescribed at discharge, medication disposal instructions, and the use of prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) in the prescription writing process., Setting: Tertiary care academic hospitals., Participants: Orthopedic physicians and mid-level providers practicing at Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and University of Maryland Medical System. Of 179 providers contacted, 127 (71 percent) completed the survey., Main Outcome Measures: Quantity of opioid prescribed, utilization of PDMPs, and provision of opioid disposal instructions., Results: While statistically significant associations were identified between quantity of opioid prescribed and surgical procedure, for five of six scenarios 95 percent of respondents recommended prescribing >55 oxycodone 5 mg pill equivalents (PEs) at discharge. An inverse correlation between years of clinical practice and mean number of PEs prescribed was observed. Fewer than 40 percent of respondents modified prescribing when presented with clinically relevant changes in scenario (history of depression or drug abuse). Over 60 percent of respondents do not use PDMPs, and 79 percent do not provide opioid disposal instructions., Conclusions: Our findings support a need for targeted education to mitigate the role of orthopedic postoperative prescribing practices on the current opioid abuse epidemic.

Background: We evaluated a cognitive task analysis-based application, Touch Surgery., Methods: Orthopaedic surgery interns completed a simulated ankle open reduction and internal fixation and a lag screw fixation before starting the boot camp. Surveys were administered before the simulation and after the boot camp., Results: Fourteen of 19 interns completed the study. Ten interns thought the application improved their baseline understanding. Nine thought the application accelerated the learning process. Eight thought the application made the procedures easier to learn., Conclusions: Touch Surgery enhanced the surgical skills curriculum, was well-received, and has the potential to supplement training of interns.

Objective: Traditional measures for evaluating resident surgical technical skills (e.g., case logs) assess operative volume but not level of surgical proficiency. Our goal was to compare the reliability and validity of 3 tools for measuring surgical skill among orthopedic residents when performing 3 open surgical approaches to the shoulder., Methods: A total of 23 residents at different stages of their surgical training were tested for technical skill pertaining to 3 shoulder surgical approaches using the following measures: Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) checklists, the Global Rating Scale (GRS), and a final pass/fail assessment determined by 3 upper extremity surgeons. Adverse events were recorded. The Cronbach α coefficient was used to assess reliability of the OSATS checklists and GRS scores. Interrater reliability was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficients. Correlations among OSATS checklist scores, GRS scores, and pass/fail assessment were calculated with Spearman ρ. Validity of OSATS checklists was determined using analysis of variance with postgraduate year (PGY) as a between-subjects factor. Significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests., Results: Criterion validity was shown between the OSATS checklists and GRS for the 3 open shoulder approaches. Checklist scores showed superior interrater reliability compared with GRS and subjective pass/fail measurements. GRS scores were positively correlated across training years. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher among PGY-1 and PGY-2 residents compared with more experienced residents., Conclusion: OSATS checklists are a valid and reliable assessment of technical skills across 3 surgical shoulder approaches. However, checklist scores do not measure quality of technique. Documenting adverse events is necessary to assess quality of technique and ultimate pass/fail status. Multiple methods of assessing surgical skill should be considered when evaluating orthopedic resident surgical performance., (Copyright © 2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In nonunion after distal humerus fracture, osteoporosis, devascularized fracture fragments, and periarticular fibrosis limit potential reconstructive options. We assessed pain relief, functional gains, and complications in 12 patients whose long-standing, painful nonunions after previous treatment with rigid internal fixation were reconstructed with a semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty, frequently with a triceps-sparing approach and anterior ulnar nerve transposition. At mean follow-up of 63 months, 11 patients had good pain relief and a good or excellent functional result: mean flexion/extension, 134 degrees to 18 degrees; mean total arc of motion, 117 degrees ; mean pronation/supination, 74 degrees to 69 degrees. Despite the 75% rate of complications (8), semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty provides a viable treatment for this difficult problem.