201. Would tirofiban have been shown non-inferior to abciximab had the TENACITY trial not been terminated for financial reasons?
- Author
-
Peter B, Berger, Judson B, Williams, Vic, Hasselblad, Karen, Chiswell, Karen S, Pieper, and Robert M, Califf
- Subjects
Male ,Abciximab ,Myocardial Infarction ,Antibodies, Monoclonal ,Middle Aged ,Article ,Survival Rate ,Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments ,Treatment Outcome ,Tirofiban ,Early Termination of Clinical Trials ,Humans ,Tyrosine ,Female ,Stents ,Acute Coronary Syndrome ,Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors ,Aged - Abstract
To investigate whether tirofiban would have been non-inferior to abciximab had the trial completed enrollment and place the termination of this trial in a broader research ethics context.TENACITY was terminated by the sponsor for financial reasons. At the time, event rates for the 2 treatment arms were unknown.TENACITY was designed to compare tirofiban with abciximab in approximately 8,000 patients; however, enrollment was terminated after 383 (4.8%) patients. The primary end-point was a composite of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, and urgent target vessel revascularization. Non-inferiority was defined as the likelihood that tirofiban would preserve at least 50% of the ability of abciximab to reduce the primary end-point at 30 days, based on abciximab's demonstrated ability to reduce such events by 43% (relative risk, 0.573; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.507-0.648; P 0.001). To determine the probability of non-inferiority given the patients already enrolled, a Bayesian approach was used.The primary composite end-point occurred in 8.8% of patients randomized to abciximab versus 6.9% receiving high-bolus-dose tirofiban (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.37-1.64). The estimated conditional power for the test that tirofiban would be non-inferior to abciximab if all patients been enrolled is 93.7%. Using the estimated predictive power method, the likelihood was 84.8%.TENACITY was well powered to identify non-inferiority with tirofiban versus abciximab, and the patients enrolled strengthened the probability that this would have been the outcome had the trial been completed. When a clinical trial is terminated solely for financial reasons, it is incumbent upon the sponsor to provide proper patient follow-up and publication of the findings.
- Published
- 2013