Search

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to develop a methodology for vaginal dose-surface maps (DSMs) in patients with cervix cancer and to investigate dose-surface histogram metrics as predictors for vaginal stenosis (St) and mucositis (Muc)., Methods and Materials: Thirty-one patients with locally advanced cervix cancer with no vaginal St/Muc (CTCAE-v3) G ≥ 2 at baseline were analyzed. Patients were divided in four morbidity groups: 15 with St/Muc G0/1, 6 with St G ≥ 2, 4 with St/Muc G ≥ 2, and 6 with Muc G ≥ 2. Patients received external beam radiotherapy and 4-fraction intracavitary/interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy using tandem and ovoids. DSMs were generated from inner/outer vaginal surfaces. DSMs of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy (Gy EQD2 3 ) were added based on a system of homologous points, to generate cumulative DSMs. Dose-surface histogram/dose-volume histogram parameters, location of high/intermediate-dose regions, rectovaginal reference point, vaginal lateral 5 mm point doses, and vagina/implant dimensions were investigated for St and Muc prediction. Average/difference DSMs and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare between groups., Results: Best predictors of stenosis were D 15-25cm2 and upper-vagina S 65-120Gy (%). Cutoffs of ∼90 Gy EQD2 3 for D 20cm2 and ∼80% for S 65Gy to top 3 cm inner vaginal surface suitably discriminated for stenosis. Spatial dose location on average/difference DSMs showed significantly higher doses (by > 20 Gy, p < 0.001) over longer parts of the dorsolateral vagina and higher rectovaginal reference point doses for any G ≥ 2 morbidity, over the whole circumference of the upper vagina for G ≥ 2 stenosis. Dose-volume histogram parameters were dependent on vaginal wall thickness. An increase of wall thickness from 2 to 4 mm resulted in an increase of D 2cm3 (D 4cm3 ) of 16% (32%)., Conclusions: A novel method was developed to generate vaginal DSMs and spatial-dose metrics. DSMs were found to correlate with vaginal stenosis. The findings of this study are promising and should be further validated on a larger patient cohort, treated with different applicators., (Copyright © 2021 American Brachytherapy Society. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Multiple treatment options are used in early local-stage cervical cancer, including combinations of surgery with neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Our aim was to determine the outcome for definitive chemoradiation with image guided brachytherapy (IGBT)., Methods: FIGO 1994 staging system was used in our study. We included 123 patients with stage IB cervical cancer, treated at 12 centers with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) ± Chemotherapy and IGBT. Three- and 5-year actuarial local control (LC), pelvic control (PC), overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and late morbidity (CTCAE v 3.0) were computed., Results: Median age was 48 (23-82) years. FIGO 1994 stage distribution was: IB1 68% and IB2 32%; 41% of the entire cohort had nodal metastases and 73% squamous-cell carcinoma. MRI-based tumor size was >40 mm in 63%. Median EBRT dose was 45 (40-50) Gy; 84% received chemotherapy. At IGBT, mean CTV-HR D90 was 93 ± 17 Gy (EQD2 10 ). D2cc for bladder was 76 ± 14 Gy, rectum 66 ± 11 Gy, sigmoid 66 ± 10 Gy, bowel 67 ± 7 Gy (EQD2 3 ). At 43-months median follow-up, 9% of patients had systemic, 6% paraaortic, 3% pelvic-nodal and 2% local failure. Five-year LC was 98%, PC 96%, CSS 90%, OS 83%. Intestinal G3--4 morbidity was 8%, urinary 7% and vaginal 0%., Conclusions: Chemoradiation with IGBT for FIGO 1994 stage IB cervical cancer leads to excellent loco-regional control with limited morbidity. In IB node-negative disease, it can be regarded equivalent to surgery in terms of oncologic outcome. In tumors with unfavorable pre-treatment characteristics, chemoradiation is the first choice to avoid combining surgery with adjuvant therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: The survival results of the PORTEC-3 trial showed a significant improvement in both overall and failure-free survival with chemoradiation therapy versus pelvic radiation therapy alone. The present analysis was performed to compare long-term adverse events (AE) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL)., Methods and Materials: In the study, 660 women with high-risk endometrial cancer were randomly assigned to receive chemoradiation therapy (2 concurrent cycles of cisplatin followed by 4 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel) or radiation therapy alone. Toxicity was graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. HRQOL was measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 and CX24/OV28 subscales and compared with normative data. An as-treated analysis was performed., Results: Median follow-up was 74.6 months; 574 (87%) patients were evaluable for HRQOL. At 5 years, grade ≥2 AE were scored for 78 (38%) patients who had received chemoradiation therapy versus 46 (24%) who had received radiation therapy alone (P = .008). Grade 3 AE did not differ significantly between the groups (8% vs 5%, P = .18) at 5 years, and only one new late grade 4 toxicity had been reported. At 3 and 5 years, sensory neuropathy toxicity grade ≥2 persisted after chemoradiation therapy in 6% (vs 0% after radiation therapy, P < .001) and more patients reported significant tingling or numbness at HRQOL (27% vs 8%, P < .001 at 3 years; 24% vs 9%, P = .002 at 5 years). Up to 3 years, more patients who had chemoradiation therapy reported limb weakness (21% vs 5%, P < .001) and lower physical (79 vs 87, P < .001) and role functioning (78 vs 88, P < .001) scores. Both treatment groups reported similar long-term global health/quality of life scores, which were better than those of the normative population., Conclusions: This study shows a long-lasting, clinically relevant, negative impact of chemoradiation therapy on toxicity and HRQOL, most importantly persistent peripheral sensory neuropathy. Physical and role functioning impairments were seen until 3 years. These long-term data are essential for patient information and shared decision-making regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer., (Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate patient- and treatment-related risk factors associated with incidence and persistence of late diarrhea after radiochemotherapy and image guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) in locally advanced cervical cancer., Materials and Methods: Of 1416 patients from the EMBRACE I study, 1199 were prospectively evaluated using physician-reported (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3 [CTCAEv3]) assessment for diarrhea; median follow-up 48 months. Patient-reported outcome (EORTC) was available in 900 patients. Incidence of CTCAE G≥2, G≥3, and EORTC "very much" diarrhea was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards regression. Binary logistic regression was used for analysis of persistent G≥1 and EORTC "quite a bit" - "very much" (≥"quite a bit") diarrhea, defined if present in at least half of all follow-ups., Results: Crude incidences of G≥2 and G≥3 diarrhea were 8.3% and 1.5%, respectively, and 8% of patients reported "very much" diarrhea. Persistent G≥1 and ≥"quite a bit" diarrhea was present in 16% and 7%, respectively. Patient-related risk factors were baseline diarrhea, smoking, and diabetes with hazard ratios of 1.4 to 7.3. Treatment-related risk factors included prescribed dose, V43 Gy, V57 Gy (lymph node boost), and para-aortic irradiation for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). G≥2 diarrhea at 3 years increased from 9.5% to 19.9% with prescribed dose 45 Gy versus 50 Gy, 8.7% to 14.0% with V43 Gy <2500 cm 3 versus >3000 cm 3 and 9.4% to 19.0% with V57 Gy <165 cm 3 versus ≥165 cm 3 . Brachytherapy-related bowel and rectum D 2cm3 were also associated with diarrhea., Conclusion: Dose and volume effects have been established for late diarrhea after radiochemotherapy and IGABT in both CTCAE and EORTC reporting. The risk of diarrhea was lower with a pelvic EBRT prescription of 45 Gy, and higher with larger lymph node boosts volumes (ie, ≥165 cm 3 ). The importance of EBRT volumes as determinants of late toxicity underline the need for continuous quality assurance of target contouring, dose planning, and conformity. The findings of brachytherapy dosimetric factors related to the intestines may become more important with highly conformal EBRT., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although women with endometrial cancer generally have a favourable prognosis, those with high-risk disease features are at increased risk of recurrence. The PORTEC-3 trial was initiated to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy during and after radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer., Methods: PORTEC-3 was an open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 trial involving 103 centres in six clinical trials collaborating in the Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup. Eligible women had high-risk endometrial cancer with FIGO 2009 stage I, endometrioid-type grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion or lymph-vascular space invasion (or both), endometrioid-type stage II or III, or stage I to III with serous or clear cell histology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (consisting of two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m 2 given during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 ) using a biased-coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis for final analysis by intention to treat and adjusted for stratification factors. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual; follow-up is ongoing. PORTEC-3 is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138., Results: 686 women were enrolled between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013. 660 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 330 were assigned to chemoradiotherapy and 330 were assigned to radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 60·2 months (IQR 48·1-73·1). 5-year overall survival was 81·8% (95% CI 77·5-86·2) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·7% (72·1-81·6) with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·54-1·06; p=0·11); 5-year failure-free survival was 75·5% (95% CI 70·3-79·9) versus 68·6% (63·1-73·4; HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53-0·95; p=0·022). Grade 3 or worse adverse events during treatment occurred in 198 (60%) of 330 who received chemoradiotherapy versus 41 (12%) of 330 patients who received radiotherapy (p<0·0001). Neuropathy (grade 2 or worse) persisted significantly more often after chemoradiotherapy than after radiotherapy (20 [8%] women vs one [1%] at 3 years; p<0·0001). Most deaths were due to endometrial cancer; in four patients (two in each group), the cause of death was uncertain. One death in the radiotherapy group was due to either disease progression or late treatment complications; three deaths (two in the chemoradiotherapy group and one in the radiotherapy group) were due to either intercurrent disease or late treatment-related toxicity., Interpretation: Adjuvant chemotherapy given during and after radiotherapy for high-risk endometrial cancer did not improve 5-year overall survival, although it did increase failure-free survival. Women with high-risk endometrial cancer should be individually counselled about this combined treatment. Continued follow-up is needed to evaluate long-term survival., Funding: Dutch Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant and Cancer Australia, L'Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco, and Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute., (Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC-BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Current risk stratification in endometrial cancer (EC) results in frequent over- and underuse of adjuvant therapy, and may be improved by novel biomarkers. We examined whether POLE proofreading mutations, recently reported in about 7% of ECs, predict prognosis., Methods: We performed targeted POLE sequencing in ECs from the PORTEC-1 and -2 trials (n = 788), and analyzed clinical outcome according to POLE status. We combined these results with those from three additional series (n = 628) by meta-analysis to generate multivariable-adjusted, pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of POLE-mutant ECs. All statistical tests were two-sided., Results: POLE mutations were detected in 48 of 788 (6.1%) ECs from PORTEC-1 and-2 and were associated with high tumor grade (P < .001). Women with POLE-mutant ECs had fewer recurrences (6.2% vs 14.1%) and EC deaths (2.3% vs 9.7%), though, in the total PORTEC cohort, differences in RFS and CSS were not statistically significant (multivariable-adjusted HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.13 to 1.37, P = .15; HR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.44, P = .11 respectively). However, of 109 grade 3 tumors, 0 of 15 POLE-mutant ECs recurred, compared with 29 of 94 (30.9%) POLE wild-type cancers; reflected in statistically significantly greater RFS (multivariable-adjusted HR = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.001 to 0.84, P = .03). In the additional series, there were no EC-related events in any of 33 POLE-mutant ECs, resulting in a multivariable-adjusted, pooled HR of 0.33 for RFS (95% CI = 0.12 to 0.91, P = .03) and 0.26 for CSS (95% CI = 0.06 to 1.08, P = .06)., Conclusion: POLE proofreading mutations predict favorable EC prognosis, independently of other clinicopathological variables, with the greatest effect seen in high-grade tumors. This novel biomarker may help to reduce overtreatment in EC., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different α/β and half-time of repair T(½) on the assessment of clinical treatment plans for patients with cervical cancer., Materials and Methods: We used EBRT and BT treatment plans of five patients, planned with MRI guided BT. We computed 3D EQD2 dose distributions of combined EBRT and BT treatments and calculated D90 of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and D(2cc) for bladder and rectum, and the ratio D(2cc)(bladder)/D90(HR-CTV). BT was modelled as PDR (two applications of 32×60cGy) and HDR (two applications of 2×7Gy). We assumed a low, standard and high value for the biological parameters: HR-CTV α/β=5/10/15Gy and T(½)=0.5/1.5/2.5h; OAR α/β=2/3/4Gy; T(½)=0.5/1.5/4.5h., Results: The chosen variation in modelling parameters had a much larger effect on PDR treatments than on HDR treatments, especially for OAR, thus creating larger uncertainties. The relative mean range of the ratio D(2cc)(bladder)/D90(HR-CTV) is 72% for PDR and 25% for HDR. Out of the 125 modelled combinations 48 PDR plans and 23 HDR plans comply with clinical objectives., Conclusion: For HDR brachytherapy, only α/β has a significant impact on reported EQD2 values, whereas for PDR both α/β and T(½) are important. Generally, the ratio D(2cc)(bladder)/D90(HR-CTV) is more favourable for PDR, even considering the larger uncertainties in EQD2., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To perform a qualitative and quantitative comparison of different treatment planning methods used in different centres for MRI-based brachytherapy (BT) of cervical cancer., Materials and Methods: Two representative patients with advanced cervical cancer (1 "limited volume case"; 1 "extensive volume case") were planned for brachytherapy (BT) with a tandem-ring applicator by six different centres. During a workshop all centres produced an institutional standard plan and an MRI-based adaptive treatment plan for each case. Optimisation was based on the fractionation schedule (HDR, PDR) and method according to the institutional protocol., Results: The loading pattern, dwell times, shape of the point A isodose varied considerably between institutional standard plans, as did dose-volume parameters for high risk CTV (HR-CTV) and also for the D(2cc) for OAR, violating the dose-volume constraints in many situations. During optimisation, the centres stayed as close as possible to the standard loading pattern and dwell times. The dose distributions and dose-volume parameters between the plans from the different centres became much more comparable after optimisation. The prescribed dose to the HR-CTV could be achieved in the limited volume case by all centres, in the extensive case only if additional needles were applied., Conclusion: Treatment planning for gynaecologic brachytherapy based on different traditions shows less variation in regard to target coverage and OAR dose, when 3D image-based optimisation is performed with a uniform prescription protocol., ((c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To affirm the effectiveness and complication rate of postoperative single-dose beta-irradiation (RT) with (90)Sr in the case of primary pterygium in a clinical trial. Pterygium is a benign disease of the supporting orbital tissue that can cause impairment of visual function. Depending on the technique used for surgery, recurrence is described in up to 70% of cases-a reason to combine the initial treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy., Methods and Materials: This trial was designed as a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind study. Surgery was performed in all cases according to the bare sclera technique. Ninety-one patients with 96 pterygia were postoperatively randomized to either beta-RT or sham RT. In the case of beta-RT, a (90)Sr eye applicator was used to deliver 2500 cGy to the sclera surface at a dose rate of between 200 and 250 cGy/min. Sham RT was given using the same type of applicator without the (90)Sr layer. After treatment, both an ophthalmologist and a radiation oncologist performed the follow-up examinations. The accumulated data were analyzed using a group sequential test., Results: Between February 1998 and September 2002, 96 eyes with primary pterygium were operated on according to the trial protocol. Additional treatment was performed within 24 hours postoperatively. Ten patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 86 patients who could be analyzed. In the 44 eyes randomized to receive beta-RT, 3 relapses occurred compared with 28 recurrences in the 42 eyes that received sham RT, for a crude control rate of 93.2% vs. 33.3%, respectively. At a mean follow-up of 18 months, major treatment complications had not been observed., Conclusion: Single-dose beta-RT after bare sclera surgery is a simple, effective, and safe treatment that reduces the risk of primary pterygium recurrence.