Search

: Objectives To determine the effects of recombinant human activated protein C (rhAPC) on the antimicrobial activity and cytokine production of normal human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs) in the presence and absence of Escherichia coli infection, with and without treatment with levofloxacin or ampicillin. : Methods MDM monolayers were infected with E. coli ATCC 25922 and treated with levofloxacin or ampicillin in the presence or absence of rhAPC. Antimicrobial activity and cytokine (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-8) concentrations in the supernatants were measured. : Results When low concentrations of levofloxacin were used, a therapeutic concentration of rhAPC enhanced intracellular antibacterial activity at all time points. With ampicillin, antibacterial activity increased, was unaffected or diminished depending upon the drug concentration and assay time. Without antibiotics, rhAPC had no antibacterial effect. E. coli caused cytokine production to increase many fold. This increase was significantly greater with antibiotics (P < 0.01). Without antibiotics, rhAPC decreased production of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6, but not IL-8. At high levofloxacin concentrations, rhAPC was associated with further increases in the concentrations of these cytokines. Cytokine concentrations at 24 h were unaffected by rhAPC in the presence of ampicillin and E. coli. : Conclusions rhAPC can affect the bactericidal activity and cytokine production of human MDM in the presence of infection and antibiotic therapy. Importantly, factors such as type and concentration of antibiotics, presence of bacteria and timing must be taken into consideration when evaluating cytokine data from septic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding how intratumoral immune populations coordinate antitumor responses after therapy can guide treatment prioritization. We systematically analyzed an established immunotherapy, donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), by assessing 348,905 single-cell transcriptomes from 74 longitudinal bone marrow samples of 25 patients with relapsed leukemia; a subset was evaluated by both protein- and transcriptome-based spatial analysis. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) DLI responders, we identified clonally expanded ZNF683 + CD8 + cytotoxic T lymphocytes with in vitro specificity for patient-matched AML. These cells originated primarily from the DLI product and appeared to coordinate antitumor immune responses through interaction with diverse immune cell types within the marrow microenvironment. Nonresponders lacked this cross-talk and had cytotoxic T lymphocytes with elevated TIGIT expression. Our study identifies recipient bone marrow microenvironment differences as a determinant of an effective antileukemia response and opens opportunities to modulate cellular therapy.

T cells are involved in protective immunity against numerous viral infections. Data regarding functional roles of human T cells in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS2) viral clearance in primary COVID-19 are limited. To address this knowledge gap, we assessed samples for associations between SARS2 upper respiratory tract viral RNA levels and early virus-specific adaptive immune responses for 95 unvaccinated clinical trial participants with acute primary COVID-19 aged 18-86 years old, approximately half of whom were considered at high risk for progression to severe COVID-19. Functionality and magnitude of acute SARS2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were evaluated, in addition to antibody responses. Most individuals with acute COVID-19 developed SARS2-specific T cell responses within 6 days of COVID-19 symptom onset. Early CD4+ T cell and CD8+ T cell responses were polyfunctional, and both strongly associated with reduced upper respiratory tract SARS2 viral RNA, independent of neutralizing antibody titers. Overall, these findings provide evidence for protective roles for circulating SARS2-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells during acute COVID-19.

Abstract: Engineered cellular therapy with CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) has revolutionized outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), but the cellular and molecular features associated with response remain largely unresolved. We analyzed serial peripheral blood samples ranging from the day of apheresis (day -28/baseline) to 28 days after CAR-T infusion from 50 patients with LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel by integrating single-cell RNA and T-cell receptor sequencing, flow cytometry, and mass cytometry to characterize features associated with response to CAR-T. Pretreatment patient characteristics associated with response included the presence of B cells and increased absolute lymphocyte count to absolute monocyte count ratio (ALC/AMC). Infusion products from responders were enriched for clonally expanded, highly activated CD8+ T cells. We expanded these observations to 99 patients from the ZUMA-1 cohort and identified a subset of patients with elevated baseline B cells, 80% of whom were complete responders. We integrated B-cell proportion ≥0.5% and ALC/AMC ≥1.2 into a 2-factor predictive model and applied this model to the ZUMA-1 cohort. Estimated progression-free survival at 1 year in patients meeting 1 or both criteria was 65% vs 31% for patients meeting neither criterion. Our results suggest that patients' immunologic state at baseline affects the likelihood of response to CAR-T through both modulation of the T-cell apheresis product composition and promoting a more favorable circulating immune compartment before therapy. These baseline immunologic features, measured readily in the clinical setting before CAR-T, can be applied to predict response to therapy., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Several vaccine strategies have been tested for the treatment of follicular lymphoma; however, none have proven successful. In a phase I dose-escalation protocol, we developed a vaccine consisting of lethally irradiated whole lymphoma cells admixed with K562 cells that constitutively secreted granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-K562)(ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00487305). Patients with grade 1, 2, or 3 A follicular lymphoma were divided into 2 study tiers based on prior treatment and received a maximum of 6 vaccines. Vaccines contained dose levels of 5 × 10 6 or 1 × 10 7 GM-K562 cells admixed with autologous tumor cells at doses ranging from 1 × 10 5 to 5 × 10 7 .Correlative studies did not demonstrate a significant immune response as assessed by delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions, B and T cell subsets, and natural killer cell subsets. Future vaccine studies should focus on identifying lymphoma-specific immunogenic proteins and modifying the vaccine immune adjuvant.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been studied in humans, but the impact on immune memory of mAb treatment during an ongoing infection remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of infusion of the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) mAb bamlanivimab on memory B cells (MBCs) in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals. Bamlanivimab treatment skewed the repertoire of MBCs targeting spike toward non-RBD epitopes. Furthermore, the relative affinity of RBD MBCs was weaker in mAb-treated individuals compared to placebo-treated individuals over time. Subsequently, after mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination, MBC differences persisted and mapped to a specific reduction in recognition of the class II RBD site, the same RBD epitope recognized by bamlanivimab. These findings indicate a substantial role of antibody feedback in regulating MBC responses to infection, and single mAb administration can continue to impact MBC responses to additional antigen exposures months later., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. S. C. has consulted for GSK, JP Morgan, Citi, Morgan Stanley, Avalia NZ, Nutcracker Therapeutics, University of California, California State Universities, United Airlines, Adagio, Sanofi, and Roche. J. S. C. has consulted for Merck and Company. P. K. is an employee and shareholder of Eli Lilly and Company. K. W. C. has consulted for Pardes Biosciences. D. M. S. has consulted for and has equity stake in Linear Therapies, Model Medicines, and Vx Biosciences and has consulted for Bayer, Kiadis, Signant Health, and Brio Clinical. All other authors report no potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: We evaluated the fully human polyclonal antibody product SAB-185 in a phase 3 trial for COVID-19., Methods: Nonhospitalized high-risk adults within 7 days of symptom onset were randomized 1:1 to open-label SAB-185 3840 units/kg or casirivimab/imdevimab 1200 mg. Noninferiority comparison was undertaken for pre-Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab expected to be fully active) and superiority comparison for the Omicron population (casirivimab/imdevimab not expected to be active). Primary outcomes were the composite of all-cause hospitalizations/deaths and grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through day 28. A secondary outcome was time to sustained symptom resolution., Results: Enrollment ended early due to low hospitalization/death rates upon Omicron emergence; 255 adults were in pre-Omicron and 392 in Omicron populations. Hospitalizations/deaths occurred in 6 (5.0%) and 3 (2.2%) of pre-Omicron SAB-185 and casirivimab/imdevimab arms (absolute difference 2.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3%-8.6%); and 5 (2.5%) versus 3 (1.5%) (absolute difference 1.0%; 95% CI, -2.3%-4.5%) for Omicron. All risk ratios for grade ≥3 TEAEs were not significant. Time to symptom resolution was significantly shorter for SAB-185 for Omicron only: 18 versus >25 days; P =.006., Conclusions: SAB-185 had an acceptable safety profile with faster symptom resolution in the Omicron population., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04518410., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. K. W. C. has consulted for Pardes Biosciences. B. O. T. has received honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Gilead Sciences. E. S. D. receives consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and GSK/ViiV; and research support through the institution from Gilead Sciences and GSK/ViiV. D. A. W. has received funding to the institution to support research; and honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Gilead Sciences. J. Z. L. has consulted for Abbvie. W. F. has received research funding to the institution from Ridgeback Biopharmaceuticals; served on adjudication committees for Janssen and Syneos; and consulted for Inhalon Biopharmaceuticals and Merck. A. L. G. reports contract testing from Abbott, Cepheid, Novavax, Pfizer, Janssen, and Hologic; and research support from Gilead and Merck, outside of the described work. J. J. E. is an ad hoc consultant to GSK/VIR; and data monitoring committee chair for Adagio (now Invivyd) phase 3 studies. J. S. C. has consulted for Merck and Company. D. M. S. has consulted for Fluxergy, Kiadis, Linear Therapies, VxBiosciences, Model Medicines, and Bayer Pharmaceuticals. C. B. and T. L. are employees of SAB Biotherapeutics. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Combined tracking of clonal evolution and chimeric cell phenotypes could enable detection of the key cellular populations associated with response following therapy, including after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We demonstrate that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations coevolve with somatic nuclear DNA mutations at relapse post-HSCT and provide a sensitive means to monitor these cellular populations. Furthermore, detection of mtDNA mutations via single-cell assay for transposase-accessible chromatin with select antigen profiling by sequencing (ASAP-seq) simultaneously determines not only donor and recipient cells but also their phenotype at frequencies of 0.1% to 1%. Finally, integration of mtDNA mutations, surface markers, and chromatin accessibility profiles enables the phenotypic resolution of leukemic populations from normal immune cells, thereby providing fresh insights into residual donor-derived engraftment and short-term clonal evolution following therapy for post-transplant leukemia relapse. As throughput evolves, we envision future development of single-cell sequencing-based post-transplant monitoring as a powerful approach for guiding clinical decision-making. Significance: mtDNA mutations enable single-cell tracking of leukemic clonal evolution and donor-recipient origin following allogeneic HSCT. This provides unprecedented insight into chimeric cellular phenotypes of early immune reconstitution, incipient relapse, and quality of donor engraftment with immediate translational potential for future clinical post-transplant monitoring and decision-making., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Reliable biomarkers of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes are critically needed. We evaluated associations of spike antibody (Ab) and plasma nucleocapsid antigen (N Ag) with clinical outcomes in nonhospitalized persons with mild-to-moderate COVID-19., Methods: Participants were nonhospitalized adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 enrolled in ACTIV-2 between January and July 2021 and randomized to placebo. We used quantitative assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike Ab and N Ag in blood and determined numbers of hospitalization/death events within 28 days and time to symptom improvement., Results: Of 209 participants, 77 (37%) had quantifiable spike Ab and 139 (67%) quantifiable N Ag. Median age was 50 years; 111 (53%) were female, 182 (87%) White, and 105 (50%) Hispanic/Latino. Higher risk of hospitalization/death was seen with unquantifiable (22/132 [16.7%]) versus quantifiable (1/77 [1.3%]) spike Ab (risk ratio [RR], 12.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.76-93.34]) and quantifiable (22/139 [15.8%]) vs unquantifiable (1/70 [1.4%]) N Ag (RR, 11.08 [95% CI, 1.52-80.51]). Increasing risk of hospitalizations/deaths was seen with increasing N Ag levels. Time to symptom improvement was longer with unquantifiable versus quantifiable spike Ab (median, 14 [interquartile range {IQR}, 8 to >27] vs 8 [IQR, 4-22] days; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.66 [95% CI, .45-.96]) and with quantifiable versus unquantifiable N Ag (median, 12 [7 to >27] vs 10 [5-22] days; aHR, 0.79 [95% CI, .52-1.21])., Conclusions: Absence of spike Ab and presence of plasma N Ag predicted hospitalization/death and delayed symptom improvement in COVID-19 outpatients., Clinical Trials Registration: NCT04518410., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. N. J. received salary support to the institution from Sagent Pharmaceuticals. D. A. W. has received funding to his institution to support research and honoraria for advisory boards and consulting from Gilead Sciences. T. H. E. serves as a consultant for Tonix Pharmaceuticals. E. S. D. receives consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, Merck, and GSK/ViiV and research support through his institution from Gilead Sciences and GSK/ViiV. J. Z. L. has received research funding from Merck. J. J. E. is an ad hoc consultant to GSK/VIR, data monitoring committee chair for Adagio Phase 3 studies. J. S. C. has consulted for Merck and Company. D. M. S. has consulted for Fluxergy, Kiadis, Linear Therapies, Matrix BioMed, Arena Pharmaceuticals, VxBiosciences, Model Medicines, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Signant Health, and Brio Clinical. K. W. C. received research funding to the institution from Merck Sharp & Dohme and is a consultant for Pardes Biosciences. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

We explored viral and symptom rebound after COVID-19 amubarvimab/romlusevimab monoclonal antibody therapy vs placebo in the randomized ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Participants underwent nasal SARS-CoV-2 PCR at study days 3, 7, 14, and 28. Viral rebound was defined as RNA ≥3 and ≥0.5 log10 copies/mL increase from day 3 or 7, and symptom rebound as hospitalization or any moderate/severe symptom for ≥2 days after initial symptom improvement. There was no difference in viral rebound (∼5%/arm) (analysis population n=713) or symptom rebound among participants who initially improved (hazard ratio 0.95 (95% CI 0.52, 1.75, analysis population) n=574); <1% had both viral/symptom rebound., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The tumor microenvironment can inhibit the efficacy of cancer therapies through mechanisms such as poor trafficking and exhaustion of immune cells. Here, to address this challenge, we exploited the safety, tumor tropism and ease of genetic manipulation of non-pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) to deliver key immune-activating cytokines to tumors via surface display on the outer membrane of E. coli K-12 DH5α. Non-pathogenic E. coli expressing murine decoy-resistant IL18 mutein (DR18) induced robust CD8 + T and natural killer (NK) cell-dependent immune responses and suppressed tumor progression in immune-competent colorectal carcinoma and melanoma mouse models. E. coli K-12 DH5α engineered to display human DR18 potently activated mesothelin-targeting chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) NK cells and enhance their trafficking into tumors, which extended survival in an NK cell treatment-resistant mesothelioma xenograft model by enhancing TNF signaling and upregulating NK activation markers. Our live bacteria-based immunotherapeutic system safely and effectively induces potent anti-tumor responses in treatment-resistant solid tumors, motivating further evaluation of this approach in the clinic., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Abstract: We report a first-in-human clinical trial using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD37, an antigen highly expressed in B- and T-cell malignancies. Five patients with relapsed or refractory CD37+ lymphoid malignancies were enrolled and infused with autologous CAR-37 T cells. CAR-37 T cells expanded in the peripheral blood of all patients and, at peak, comprised >94% of the total lymphocytes in 4 of 5 patients. Tumor responses were observed in 4 of 5 patients with 3 complete responses, 1 mixed response, and 1 patient whose disease progressed rapidly and with relative loss of CD37 expression. Three patients experienced prolonged and severe pancytopenia, and in 2 of these patients, efforts to ablate CAR-37 T cells, which were engineered to coexpress truncated epidermal growth factor receptor, with cetuximab were unsuccessful. Hematopoiesis was restored in these 2 patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. No other severe, nonhematopoietic toxicities occurred. We investigated the mechanisms of profound pancytopenia and did not observe activation of CAR-37 T cells in response to hematopoietic stem cells in vitro or hematotoxicity in humanized models. Patients with pancytopenia had sustained high levels of interleukin-18 (IL-18) with low levels of IL-18 binding protein in their peripheral blood. IL-18 levels were significantly higher in CAR-37-treated patients than in both cytopenic and noncytopenic cohorts of CAR-19-treated patients. In conclusion, CAR-37 T cells exhibited antitumor activity, with significant CAR expansion and cytokine production. CAR-37 T cells may be an effective therapy in hematologic malignancies as a bridge to hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04136275., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Abstract: The use of CD34+ selected stem cell boost (SCB) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (allo-HCT) has been increasing. Predictors of treatment failure after SCB, both in the context of poor graft function (PGF) or other settings, are not well characterized. We report among the largest single-center retrospective experiences of the use of SCB and evaluate potential predictors of response and outcomes. A total of 58 patients who underwent HCT between 2015 and 2022 and who received SCB, were identified. The indication for SCB was predominantly PGF, defined as the presence of ≥2 cytopenias for at least 2 consecutive weeks beyond day +14 after allo-HCT in the presence of ≤30% bone marrow cellularity and ≥90% donor myeloid chimerism in the absence of morphologic disease. The median dose of infused CD34+ selected SCB products was 3.88 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.99 × 106 to 9.92 × 106). The median 2-year overall survival and nonrelapse mortality after SCB was 47% and 38%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of 6-month grade 3 to 4 acute and 2-year moderate-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease after SCB were 3.4% and 12%, respectively. Overall response (complete response + partial response) was attained in 36 of 58 patients (62%) and in 69% of patients with PGF. On multivariable analysis, an active infection at the time of SCB was the greatest predictor of poor response and survival (P = .013) after SCB. SCB can restore hematopoiesis in the majority of patients, particularly for those with PGF and in whom there is no active infection at the time of infusion., (© 2024 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: The essential branched-chain amino acids leucine, isoleucine and valine are considered anabolic and stimulate protein synthesis in the muscles as well in the liver. They also promote muscle recovery and contribute to glucose homeostasis. Recent studies in critically ill patients have demonstrated that depletion of plasma leucine is associated with increased mortality, but data in the non-critical care setting is lacking., Methods: This secondary analysis of the randomized controlled Effect of early nutritional support on Frailty, Functional Outcomes, and Recovery of malnourished medical inpatients Trial (EFFORT), investigated the impact of leucine, isoleucine, and valine metabolism on clinical outcomes. The primary endpoint was 180-day all-cause mortality., Results: Among 238 polymorbid patients with available metabolite measurements, low serum leucin levels were associated with a doubled risk of 180-day all-cause mortality in a fully adjusted regression model (adjusted HR 2.20 [95% CI 1.46-3.30], p < 0.001). There was also an association with mortality for isoleucine (1.56 [95% CI 1.03-2.35], p = 0.035) and valine (1.69 [95% CI 1.13-2.53], p = 0.011). When comparing effects of nutritional support on mortality in patients with high and low levels of leucine, there was no evidence of significant differences in effectiveness of the intervention. The same was true for isoleucine and valine., Conclusion: Our data suggest that depletion of leucine, isoleucine, and valine among malnourished polymorbid patients is associated with increases in long-term mortality. However, patients with low metabolite levels did not show a pronounced benefit from nutritional support. Further research should focus on the clinical effects of nutritional support in patients with depleted stores of essential branched-chain amino acids., Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02517476 (registered 7 August 2015)., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

T cell alloreactivity against minor histocompatibility antigens (mHAgs)-polymorphic peptides resulting from donor-recipient (D-R) disparity at sites of genetic polymorphisms-is at the core of the therapeutic effect of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Despite the crucial role of mHAgs in graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) reactions, it remains challenging to consistently link patient-specific mHAg repertoires to clinical outcomes. Here we devise an analytic framework to systematically identify mHAgs, including their detection on HLA class I ligandomes and functional verification of their immunogenicity. The method relies on the integration of polymorphism detection by whole-exome sequencing of germline DNA from D-R pairs with organ-specific transcriptional- and proteome-level expression. Application of this pipeline to 220 HLA-matched allo-HCT D-R pairs demonstrated that total and organ-specific mHAg load could independently predict the occurrence of acute GvHD and chronic pulmonary GvHD, respectively, and defined promising GvL targets, confirmed in a validation cohort of 58 D-R pairs, for the prevention or treatment of post-transplant disease recurrence., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

T cells are involved in protective immunity against numerous viral infections. Data regarding functional roles of human T cells in SARS-CoV-2 (SARS2) viral clearance in primary COVID-19 are limited. To address this knowledge gap, samples were assessed for associations between SARS2 upper respiratory tract viral RNA levels and early virus-specific adaptive immune responses for 95 unvaccinated clinical trial participants with acute primary COVID-19 aged 18-86 years old, approximately half of whom were considered high risk for progression to severe COVID-19. Functionality and magnitude of acute SARS2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses were evaluated, in addition to antibody responses. Most individuals with acute COVID-19 developed SARS2-specific T cell responses within 6 days of COVID-19 symptom onset. Early CD4 T cell and CD8 T cell responses were polyfunctional, and both strongly associated with reduced upper respiratory tract SARS2 viral RNA, independent of neutralizing antibody titers. Overall, these findings provide evidence for protective roles for circulating SARS2-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells during acute COVID-19.

Background: It is unknown if early COVID-19 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy can reduce risk of Long COVID. The mAbs amubarvimab/romlusevimab were previously demonstrated to reduce risk of hospitalization/death by 79%. This study assessed the impact of amubarvimab/romlusevimab on late outcomes, including Long COVID., Methods: Non-hospitalized high-risk adults within 10 days of COVID-19 symptom onset enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial of amubarvimab/romlusevimab for COVID-19 treatment. Late symptoms, assessed using a participant-completed symptom diary, were a pre-specified exploratory endpoint. The primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of Long COVID by participant self-report (presence of COVID-19 symptoms as recorded in the diary at week 36) or hospitalization or death by week 36. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to address incomplete outcome ascertainment, giving weighted risk ratios (wRR) comparing amubarvimab/romlusevimab to placebo., Findings: Participants received amubarvimab/romlusevimab (n = 390) or placebo (n = 390) between January and July 2021. Median age was 49 years, 52% were female, 18% Black/African American, 49% Hispanic/Latino, and 9% COVID-19-vaccinated at entry. At week 36, 103 (13%) had incomplete outcome ascertainment, and 66 (17%) on amubarvimab/romlusevimab and 92 (24%) on placebo met the primary outcome (wRR = 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.93). The difference was driven by fewer hospitalizations/deaths with amubarvimab/romlusevimab (4%) than placebo (13%). Among 652 participants with available diary responses, 53 (16%) on amubarvimab/romlusevimab and 44 (14%) on placebo reported presence of Long COVID., Interpretation: Amubarvimab/romlusevimab treatment, while highly effective in preventing hospitalizations/deaths, did not reduce risk of Long COVID. Additional interventions are needed to prevent Long COVID., Funding: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab supplied by Brii Biosciences., Competing Interests: Dr. Evering reports other from AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG), during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Tonix Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Dr. Moser reports grants from NIH/NIAID, grants from NIH/NIAID, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Jilg reports other from AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG), during the conduct of the study; grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH), grants from Harvard University Center for AIDS Research (HU-CFAR), other from Sagent Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Mr. Ritz reports grants from NIH/NIAID, grants from NIH/NIAID, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Wohl reports grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, grants and personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, grants and personal fees from Merck & Co, personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceuticals, personal fees from BMS, personal fees from Theratechnologies, personal fees from EMD Serono, personal fees from Regeneron, outside the submitted work. Dr. Margolis reports other from BRII Biosciences, outside the submitted work. Dr. Eron reports grants from National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Merck & Co, grants and personal fees from Gilead Sciences, other from Invivyd, outside the submitted work. Dr. Currier reports personal fees from Merck, outside the submitted work. Dr. Daar reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Gilead, grants and personal fees from ViiV, personal fees from Theratechnologies, outside the submitted work. Dr. Smith reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Model Medicines, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Gilead, personal fees from Lucira, personal fees from VXBiosciences, personal fees from Linear Therapies, personal fees from Red Queen Therapeutics, other from A2 Bio, personal fees from Pharma Holdings, personal fees from Evidera, personal fees from Hyundai, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hughes reports grants from United States National Institutes of Health, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Chew reports grants from NIH/NIAID, grants from NIH/NCATS, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Pardes Biosciences, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no competing interests to disclose., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent a crucial antiviral strategy for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is unclear whether combination mAbs offer a benefit over single-active mAb treatment. Amubarvimab and romlusevimab significantly reduced the risk of hospitalizations or death in the ACTIV-2/A5401 trial. Certain SARS-CoV-2 variants are intrinsically resistant against romlusevimab, leading to only single-active mAb therapy with amubarvimab in these variants. We evaluated virologic outcomes in individuals treated with single- versus dual-active mAbs., Methods: Participants were nonhospitalized adults at higher risk of clinical progression randomized to amubarvimab plus romlusevimab or placebo. Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 RNA levels and targeted S-gene next-generation sequencing was performed on anterior nasal samples. We compared viral load kinetics and resistance emergence between individuals treated with effective single- versus dual-active mAbs depending on the infecting variant., Results: Study participants receiving single- or dual-active mAbs had similar demographics, baseline nasal viral load, symptom score, and symptom duration. Compared with single-active mAb treatment, treatment with dual-active mAbs led to faster viral load decline at study days 3 (P < .001) and 7 (P < .01). Treatment-emergent resistance mutations were more likely to be detected after amubarvimab plus romlusevimab treatment than with placebo (2.6% vs 0%; P < .001) and were more frequently detected in the setting of single-active compared with dual-active mAb treatment (7.3% vs 1.1%; P < .01). Single-active and dual-active mAb treatment resulted in similar decrease in rates of hospitalizations or death., Conclusions: Compared with single-active mAb therapy, dual-active mAbs led to similar clinical outcomes but significantly faster viral load decline and a lower risk of emergent resistance., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an orphan neurodegenerative disease. Immune system dysregulation plays an essential role in ALS onset and progression. Our preclinical studies have shown that the administration of exogenous allogeneic B cells improves outcomes in murine models of skin and brain injury through a process termed pligodraxis, in which B cells adopt an immunoregulatory and neuroprotective phenotype in an injured environment. Here, we investigated the effects of B-cell therapy in the SOD1 G93A mouse preclinical model of ALS and in a person living with ALS. Purified splenic mature naïve B cells from haploidentical donor mice were administered intravenously in SOD1 G93A mice for a total of 10 weekly doses. For the clinical study in a person with advanced ALS, IgA gammopathy of unclear significance, and B lymphopenia, CD19 + B cells were positively selected from a healthy haploidentical donor and infused intravenously twice, at a 60-day interval. Repeated intravenous B-cell administration was safe and significantly delayed disease onset, extended survival, reduced cellular apoptosis, and decreased astrogliosis in SOD1 G93A mice. Repeated B-cell infusion in a person with ALS was safe and did not appear to generate a clinically evident inflammatory response. An improvement of 5 points on the ALSFRS-R scale was observed after the first infusion. Levels of inflammatory markers showed persistent reduction post-infusion. This represents a first demonstration of the efficacy of haploidentical B-cell infusion in the SOD1 G93A mouse and the safety and feasibility of using purified haploidentical B lymphocytes as a cell-based therapeutic strategy for a person with ALS., (© 2024 Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)