201. Detecting frontotemporal dementia syndromes using MRI biomarkers
- Author
-
Frederik Barkhof, Yolande A.L. Pijnenburg, Päivi Hartikainen, Juha Koikkalainen, Marie Bruun, Marta Baroni, Kristian Steen Frederiksen, Anne M. Remes, Jyrki Lötjönen, Gunhild Waldemar, Hanneke F.M. Rhodius-Meester, Mark van Gils, Patrizia Mecocci, Le Gjerum, Wiesje M. van der Flier, Hilkka Soininen, Steen G. Hasselbalch, Internal medicine, Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience - Neurodegeneration, Radiology and nuclear medicine, Divisions, APH - Personalized Medicine, and APH - Methodology
- Subjects
Male ,behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia ,lcsh:RC346-429 ,Primary progressive aphasia ,Cohort Studies ,0302 clinical medicine ,Nuclear Medicine and Imaging ,differential diagnosis ,Cognitive decline ,05 social sciences ,Brain ,Regular Article ,Frontotemporal lobar degeneration ,ta3142 ,Middle Aged ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Neurology ,frontotemporal lobar degeneration ,Frontotemporal Dementia ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,Female ,Radiology ,Frontotemporal dementia ,MRI ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cognitive Neuroscience ,Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia ,Dementia ,Differential diagnosis ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging ,Neurology (clinical) ,ta3111 ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,ta3112 ,050105 experimental psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Primary progressive aphasi ,medicine ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,ta219 ,Vascular dementia ,lcsh:Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Dementia with Lewy bodies ,business.industry ,ta1182 ,medicine.disease ,primary progressive aphasia ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,dementia - Abstract
Background Diagnosing frontotemporal dementia may be challenging. New methods for analysis of regional brain atrophy patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could add to the diagnostic assessment. Therefore, we aimed to develop automated imaging biomarkers for differentiating frontotemporal dementia subtypes from other diagnostic groups, and from one another. Methods In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included 1213 patients (age 67 ± 9, 48% females) from two memory clinic cohorts: 116 frontotemporal dementia, 341 Alzheimer's disease, 66 Dementia with Lewy bodies, 40 vascular dementia, 104 other dementias, 229 mild cognitive impairment, and 317 subjective cognitive decline. Three MRI atrophy biomarkers were derived from the normalized volumes of automatically segmented cortical regions: 1) the anterior vs. posterior index, 2) the asymmetry index, and 3) the temporal pole left index. We used the following performance metrics: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. To account for the low prevalence of frontotemporal dementia we pursued a high specificity of 95%. Cross-validation was used in assessing the performance. The generalizability was assessed in an independent cohort (n = 200). Results The anterior vs. posterior index performed with an AUC of 83% for differentiation of frontotemporal dementia from all other diagnostic groups (Sensitivity = 59%, Specificity = 95%, positive likelihood ratio = 11.8, negative likelihood ratio = 0.4). The asymmetry index showed highest performance for separation of primary progressive aphasia and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (AUC = 85%, Sensitivity = 79%, Specificity = 92%, positive likelihood ratio = 9.9, negative likelihood ratio = 0.2), whereas the temporal pole left index was specific for detection of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (AUC = 85%, Sensitivity = 82%, Specificity = 80%, positive likelihood ratio = 4.1, negative likelihood ratio = 0.2). The validation cohort provided corresponding results for the anterior vs. posterior index and temporal pole left index. Conclusion This study presents three quantitative MRI biomarkers, which could provide additional information to the diagnostic assessment and assist clinicians in diagnosing frontotemporal dementia., Highlights • Quantitative MRI biomarkers (API, ASI, and TPL) for detection of FTD and its subtypes. • API differentiated FTD from other diagnostic groups with AUC of 83%. • ASI and TPL showed highest performance for PPA subtypes. • A subcortical bvFTD subtype resembling AD atrophy pattern seems undetectable for MRI.
- Published
- 2019