201. Is an additional post-myocardial infarction β-blocker trial required in the era of early revascularization?
- Author
-
Hans Eiskjær, Hans Mickley, and Hans Erik Bøtker
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Ejection fraction ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Adrenergic beta-Antagonists ,Myocardial Infarction ,Revascularization ,medicine.disease ,Post myocardial infarction ,Internal medicine ,Cardiology ,Humans ,Treatment strategy ,Medicine ,cardiovascular diseases ,Myocardial infarction ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Early phase ,business ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - Abstract
The new guidelines addressing the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes have recently been published.1,2These guidelines are the first in Europe after the redefinition of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Treatment strategies in the early phase of AMI have changed dramatically during the last 10–15 years. However, the evidence that confirms a prognostic benefit of β-blockade in AMI was obtained in the 1980s. Only one randomized, post-AMI trial addresses the effects of β-blockade in the era of ACE-inhibitors, statins, anti-platelet therapy, fibrinolytic treatment or early coronary revascularization.3This study, however, excluded patients with a LVEF >40%. Do we really have data that justify recommendation of β-blockers to …
- Published
- 2004