Search

Glucocorticoid-refractory (SR) chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a multisystem immunological disease and the leading cause of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in patients surviving longer than 2 years after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Both ruxolitinib (RUX) and extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) have shown activity for SR-cGVHD which motivated us to treat refractory cGHVD patients with the RUX-ECP combination. In this retrospective survey, 23 patients received RUX-ECP as salvage therapy for SR-cGVHD. The best response (CR or PR) at any time point during treatment was 74% (17/23) including 9% (2/23) CR and 65% (15/23) PR. The 24-months-survival was 75% (CI 56.0-94.1). Newly diagnosed cytopenia occurred in 22% (5/23) and CMV reactivation was observed in 26% (6/23) of the patients. Serum levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) correlated with response. Our retrospective analysis shows that the RUX-ECP combination is safe and has activity in a fraction of patients with SR-cGVHD, which needs validation in a prospective trial.

The mechanism of action of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate, using a preclinical in vivo model, that the antigen‐specific immunosuppressive effect of ECP is mediated solely by CD11c+ dendritic cells., Summary Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) represents one of the most widespread and effective cell therapies for graft‐versus‐host disease and other T cell‐mediated disorders. However, the key factors affecting the therapeutic efficacy of ECP remain unclear. We hypothesized that therapeutic effects are mediated by ECP‐treated antigen‐presenting dendritic cells (DC). To test this hypothesis, we used the experimental model of contact hypersensitivity (CHS). The ECP’s therapeutic activity improved when the total cell dose of the ECP‐treated cells was increased. We used different haptens during sensitization to demonstrate that the anti‐inflammatory activity of ECP is antigen‐specific. This confirmed the hypothesis that professional antigen‐presenting cells are involved in the mode of action. Also, the ECP’s therapeutic activity was abrogated by the depletion of CD11c+ DC, which represents fewer than 1% of all the ECP‐exposed cells. Finally, we confirm the critical importance of CD11c+ DC for ECP activity by showing that only a few purified CD11c+ DC are sufficient to mediate its therapeutic effect. The finding that ECP‐treated, physiological antigen‐presenting DC alone mediate antigen‐specific modulation of a pathological immune response may result in better‐targeted interventions when treating patients.

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective treatment for graft-vs-host-disease (GvHD). Photopheresis can be performed in offline or inline method. The first uses a conventional cell separator for collection of mononuclear-cells that are photoactivated by a separate device and manually reinfused; the second one involves a dedicated device performing the entire procedure (collection, photoactivation and reinfusion). Study design and methods The objective was to compare the two methods and cell product features to highlight key process, devices performance, and to evaluate ECP clinical response. Patients developing steroid-resistant GvHD underwent ECP as second-line treatment using either inline (Therakos CellEx) or offline system (Terumo BCT Spectra or Optia and UVA PIT system). Data about patients' features, pre-apheresis blood-count, cell product characteristics and clinical response were collected for analysis. Results We evaluated 494 procedures performed on 28 patients from April 2018 to March 2019. The offline procedure allows to achieve greater cell yield, it is characterized by larger processed blood volume, longer runtime, and higher ACD consumption. The inline procedure shows shorter runtime, high mononuclear-cells percentage and low percentage of granulocytes in cell product. We observed a significant difference in cell yields between inline and offline system; furthermore we did not find a significant relationship between cell dose and clinical response. Conclusion Inline ECP is fast, highly automated and productive, making it particularly suitable for ECP treatments. Offline ECP collects high cell yields implying longer procedure and greater operator intervention. Our study did not find a significant relationship between cell dose and GVHD response.

Ultraviolet blood irradiation (UBI) was used with success in the 1930s and 1940s for a variety of diseases. Despite the success, the lack of understanding of the detailed mechanisms of actions, and the achievements of antibiotics, phased off the use of UBI from the 1950s. The emergence of novel viral infections, from HIV/AIDS to Ebola, from SARS and MERS, and SARS-CoV-2, bring back the attention to this therapeutical opportunity. UBI has a complex virucidal activity, mostly acting on the immune system response. It has effects on lymphocytes (T-cells and B-cells), macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and lipids. The Knott technique was applied for bacterial infections such as tuberculosis to viral infections such as hepatitis or influenza. The more complex extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is also being applied to hematological cancers such as T-cell lymphomas. Further studies of UBI may help to create a useful device that may find applications for novel viruses that are resistant to known antivirals or vaccines, or also bacteria that are resistant to known antibiotics.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is still the most important cause of mortality and morbidity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Though perfect response rates are not achieved, steroids are still the first-line treat-ment. In the face of the presence of the drugs approved by FDA in recent years for acute and chronic GVHD as second-line therapy in the steroid-refractory group, there exists no standard approach. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) with an immunomodulatory effect, is favored in the treatment of both acute and chronic steroid refractory GVHD as it does not increase the risk of relapses or infections. Having a low profile of side effects, ECP is also generally well-tolerated by patients. Being a time requiring procedure, the fact is that it is not able to be practiced in all health centers and requires central venous catheters in patients unfit for venous access may be enumerated among its shortcomings. No complete standard is available with respect to ECP application frequency-time; it varies from one center to another. The Turkish Society of Apheresis established the Turkish ECP (TECP) group and sought some answers to the questions regarding the use of ECP in the treatment of GVHD, and issued a position statement.

Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the definitive treatment option of several malignant and non-malignant diseases. In Europe, more than 4500 allo-SCT are performed yearly in children. Technical innovations, and better strategies focused on preventing infections and reducing toxicity, among others, have improved the outcome of allo-SCT in the last decades (50% reduction of non-relapse mortality (NRM) and better survival). However, graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains the major cause of treatment failure and SCT related death. GVHD can be defined as a donor T-cell immune reaction after allo-SCT against genetically defined proteins in different organs in the immunosupressed recipient. It complies disturbances in pathways of immunological recognition, reconstitution and failure to acquire immunological tolerance, thereby resulting in both alloimmune and autoimmune attacks on multiple host tissues. The need for increased and prolonged immunosuppression (IS) to treat GVHD, in addition to the immunosuppressive effects of the disease itself, increases the risk of infection, organ impairment, poor quality of life and ultimately, mortality. GVHD has been classically classified according to its chronological pattern after allo-SCT, using day+100 as cut-off: acute GVHD (aGVHD) 100 days. However, GVHD is now considered as a continuum and clinical manifestations, rather than time after SCT, should guide the difference between acute- and chronic-GVHD (Table 1). Regarding this consideration, the following categories of GVHD are recognized: classical aGVHD occurring within 100 days after SCT or donor leukocyte infusion; persistent, recurrent or late-onset aGVHD (> day+100); classical cGVHD; overlap syndrome with concomitant acute- and chronic-GVHD signs.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedure is based on mononuclear cells (MNC) apheresis and their extracorporeal UVA exposure. It has been applied mainly in hematology and transplantation. Over thirty years of experience confirmed its effectiveness, outstanding safety profile and good tolerance. These observations encourage the implementation of ECP in the treatment of autoimmune connective tissue diseases. The procedure might be considered in refractory cases, when the first line treatment strategies do not control disease activity or immunosuppressants are contraindicated and in the group of patients with high risk of infections. Current literature about using ECP in rheumatology is scarce and most data come from case reports and small observational studies. Systemic sclerosis is the most studied rheumatic disease in the field of ECP use. The disease appeared on the list of clinical applications of ECP therapy according to American Society for Apheresis. However, no European or American guidelines, or recommendations for the treatment in rheumatology suggest ECP as the treatment option. There are no standards in performing ECP in rheumatic diseases concerning indications, length of therapy, concomitant immunosuppressive treatment, follow up or patients characteristic. In this review, we have searched literature concerning ECP use in rheumatic diseases.

Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGvHD) is an important cause of late non-relapse morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) [1]. The incidence...

Case presentation A 71-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of diffuse chest pain and a mass on routine chest radiography. He did not report cough, dyspnea, fever, night sweats, or weight loss. His medical history was remarkable for chronic lymphocytic leukemia diagnosed 13 years before presentation, and secondary myelodysplastic syndrome diagnosed 2 years before the onset of the current symptoms. As a curative approach, he had received a matched unrelated stem cell transplantation 16 months earlier, and he had been in complete remission since. He developed chronic graft-vs-host disease, presenting mainly as oral ulceration (grade 1, according to National Institute of Health consensus criteria), which had been treated with oral cyclosporine and extracorporeal photopheresis. The immunosuppression had been tapered 6 months before presentation. Routine medication included co-trimoxazole prophylaxis twice per week. He had no known allergies, and he denied recent travels and sick contacts.

Background: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an effective immunomodulatory therapy for various diseases. Autologous leukocytes are collected, photoactivated with a photosensitizer (8-methoxypsoralen, 8-MOP) and UVA light, and subsequently reinfused back to the patient. Leukapheresis and UVA irradiation systems can be integrated into one device (inline) or handled by two separate devices (offline). ECP works via intercalation of 8-MOP into DNA helices and UVA-based interactions to inhibit DNA replication. 8-MOP is known to adhere to plastic materials, which might reduce its availability for intercalation. In the present study we examined the bioavailability of 8-MOP when different plastic materials and solvents are used as matrices. Methods: Varying amounts of shredded ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and polyvinylchloride (PVC) from the MacoGenic irradiation bag (EVA1), UVA PIT irradiation bag (EVA2), UVA PIT recirculation bag (PVC A) and UVA PIT tubing (PVC B) by MacoPharma and PIT Medical Systems, respectively, were incubated with 200 ng mL−1 8-MOP dissolved in diisopropyl ether (DIPE) plus toluene 90/10 vol%, deionized water or plasma. After 2 h 8-MOP concentrations were determined by GC-MS. Results: After incubation, 8-MOP concentrations varied depending on the amount and type of plastic (PVC > EVA) and solvent (water > plasma > DIPE/toluene). Absorption to 200 mg EVA1 or EVA2 resulted in 8-MOP concentrations of 57% or 32% in water, 91% or 80% in plasma, and 93% or 92% in DIPE/toluene, while 200 mg PVC A and PVC B yielded recovery rates of 26% and 10% in water, 76% and 75% in plasma, and 55% and 30% in DIPE/toluene, respectively. Remaining 8-MOP differed significantly between container materials (EVA vs. PVC; p < 0.022) but not manufacturers (MacoPharma vs. PIT Medical Systems). Conclusion: Absorption loss of 8-MOP depends on the type of plastic and solvent and is more pronounced with water than with plasma. As the DNA binding effect of 8-MOP is dose-dependent, ECP starting doses should be adjusted to ensure that a sufficient concentration of free bioavailable 8-MOP is present during UV irradiation.

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an immunomodulatory cellular therapy which has been shown to induce a tolerogenic state in patients with acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease. ECOG-ACRIN explored the activity of ECP as a part of a reduced intensity conditioning regimen in two multicenter trials in patients with MDS (E1902) and lymphomas (E1402). While both studies closed before completing accrual, we report results in 23 patients (17 MDS and 6 lymphoma). Study design and methods Patients received 2 days of ECP followed by pentostatin 4 mg/m2 /day for two consecutive days, followed by 600 cGy of total body irradiation prior to stem cell infusion. Immunosuppression for aGVHD was infusional cyclosporine A or tacrolimus and methotrexate on day +1, +3, with mycophenolate mofetil starting on day 100 for chronic GVHD prophylaxis. Results All patients engrafted, with median time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 15-18 days and 10-18 days respectively. Grade 3 or 4 aGVHD occurred in 13% and chronic extensive GVHD in 30%. Conclusions These studies demonstrate that ECP/pentostatin/TBI is well tolerated and associated with adequate engraftment of neutrophils and platelets in patients with lymphomas and MDS.

Background A new protocol has been developed on the Amicus Separator that enables the device to perform online extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedures when used in conjunction with the Phelix photoactivation device and associated disposable kit. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the Amicus ECP System in adult subjects with steroid‐refractory or dependent chronic graft vs host disease (cGVHD). Study Design and Methods Eight subjects with mild to severe cGVHD underwent 31 procedures. Subject safety evaluations were performed pre and post procedure and adverse events (AEs) were recorded during treatment and 24 hours after the last procedure. In vitro evaluations of the treated cells included hematology counts and lymphocyte apoptosis, viability and proliferation as measures for ECP procedure validation. Results For n = 23 evaluable procedures, median (range) procedure time was 88 (78‐110) minutes, during which 2.9 (0.6‐4.7) × 109 TNCs (approximately 90% MNCs) were treated and reinfused to the subjects. All subject safety evaluations (vitals, cell counts, plasma hemoglobin and bacterial and endotoxin testing) were within expected ranges. All device or procedure related AEs were mild in nature. After 24 hours in culture, 86 (52‐98)% of treated lymphocytes were apoptotic compared to 27 (15‐51)% in controls. Inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation was >91% in all procedures. Conclusion ECP procedures were safely completed in adult subjects with SR‐cGVHD treated using the new online Amicus ECP system.

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a second-line therapy in acute and chronic GVHD and solid organ transplant rejection. We report ECP use in 98 pediatric patients in seven UK centers from 2010 to 2017, the majority treated for aGVHD (73.5%). ECP was safe and well tolerated including in low body weight patients. Most patients were on multiple immunosuppressive therapies prior to ECP; 45.9% were able to reduce or stop immunosuppression with treatment. Complete or partial response was reported in almost 60%. This study supports the need to include ECP treatment data to national transplant databases to provide accurate information regarding service provision, patient outcomes, and safety.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE We previously reported that myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) were increased in patients with leukemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (L-CTCL) following extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) using the Therakos UVAR XTS™ system. We now assessed monocyte-derived mDCs (Mo-DCs) in L-CTCL patients treated with the CELLEXTM photopheresis system. CD209, a transmembrane receptor, was used to define Mo-DCs. METHODS Peripheral blood samples from baseline pre-ECP and at Day 2, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-ECP were analyzed by flow cytometry for Lin- HLA-DR+ CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs), Lin- HLA-DR+ CD11c+ mDCs, and CD209+ mDCs. The expression of CD209 mRNA was assessed by real-time PCR. RESULTS At baseline, 7 of 19 patients had lower than normal mDCs, and all patients had lower than normal CD209+ mDCs in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (0.005% in patients, n = 19, vs 0.50% in healthy donors, n = 7, P

Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is an established treatment strategy in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). This study's main objective was to analyze the clinical response and impact of ECP therapy in steroid dose reduction. A retrospective observational series of 113 patients from 7 transplantation centers was analyzed. Sixty-five patients (58%) had acute GVHD (aGVHD), and 48 (42%) had chronic GVHD (cGVHD). All ECP procedures were performed with the off-line system. The median number of procedures until achievement of initial response was 3 for both patients with aGVHD and those with cGVHD. ECP was the second-line therapy in 48% of the aGVHD cases and in 50% of the cGVHD cases. 71% of the cases of aGVHD were grade III-IV, and 69% of the cases of cGVHD were severe. The overall response rate on day 28 was 53% (complete response [CR] rate, 45%) in the patients with aGVHD and 67% (CR, 23%) in those with cGVHD. Skin was the most frequently involved organ, with a response rate of 58% (CR, 49%) in the patients with aGVHD and 69% (CR 29%) in those with cGVHD. At the end of ECP treatment, 60% of patients treated for aGVHD who responded were able to stop steroid therapy, with a median dose reduction of 100%. Significant differences in overall survival were observed for patients responding to ECP with aGVHD (hazard ratio [HR], 4.3; P.001) and with cGVHD (HR, 4.8; P = .003). Our data indicate that ECP is a valid therapeutic alternative in patients with steroid-refractory aGVHD and cGVHD, permitting significant steroid dosage reductions.

Background Two extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) instruments, the CELLEX and the UVARXTS are currently being used "off-label" in the US for treatment of graft versus host disease (GVHD). Our study compared the performance of the two instruments in the setting of acute and chronic GVHD. Study design and methods We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients with steroid refractory or steroid resistant GVHD undergoing ECP at Barnes Jewish Hospital. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the comparative efficacy of the two instruments with respect to steroid dose reduction (≥50% from baseline) and clinical improvement in GVHD. Chi-square/Fisher exact tests were used to compare the incidence of adverse events, while multivariate Cox regression was employed to assess a potential difference in mortality between the two instrument treatment cohorts. Results After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in the odds of steroid dose reduction (OR = 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-3.90, p = 0.50) or clinical improvement (OR 2.0, 95% CI: 0.63-6.41, p = 0.24) between the two instrument treatment cohorts. The frequency of adverse events (CELLEX 45.4%; UVAR XTS 40.5%, p = 0.55) was also comparable between the cohorts. There was no significant difference in mortality of either acute or chronic GVHD patients when treated by the CELLEX as compared to the UVAR-XTS (aHR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.35-1.25, p = 0.20). Conclusion The efficacy and safety of the two ECP instruments, the CELLEX and the UVAR-XTS, are comparable for the treatment of acute and chronic GVHD.

Introduction: The diagnosis and treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation has recently gained recognition within the transplant community. Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), currently used to treat chronic lung allograft dysfunction, modulates various pathways of the immune system known to be involved in AMR. We hypothesize that adding ECP to established AMR treatments could prevent the rebound of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the role of ECP as an add-on therapy to prevent the rebound of DSA. Methods: Lung transplant recipients who received ECP as an add-on therapy for pulmonary AMR between January 2010 and January 2019 were included in this single-center retrospective analysis. Baseline demographics of the patients, as well as their immunological characteristics and long-term transplant outcomes, were analyzed. Results: A total of 41 patients developed clinical AMR during the study period. Sixteen patients received ECP as an add-on therapy after first-line AMR treatment. Among the 16 patients, 2 (13%) had pretransplant DSA, both against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I (B38, B13, and C06). Fifteen patients (94%) developed de novo DSA (dnDSA), i.e., 10 (63%) against class I and 14 (88%) against class II. The median time to dnDSA after lung transplantation was 361 days (range 25–2,548). According to the most recent International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus report, 2 (13%) patients had definite clinical AMR, 6 (38%) had probable AMR, and 7 (44%) had possible AMR. The median mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of dnDSA at the time of clinical diagnosis was 4,220 (range 1,319–10,552) for anti-HLA class I and 10,953 (range 1,969–27,501) for anti-HLA class II antibodies. ECP was performed for a median of 14 cycles (range 1–64). MFI values of dnDSA against HLA classes I and II were significantly reduced over the treatment period (for anti-class I: 752; range 70–2,066; for anti-class II: 5,612; range 1,689–21,858). The 1-year survival rate was 55%. No adverse events related to ECP were reported in any of the patients. Conclusions: ECP is associated with a reduction of dnDSA in lung transplant recipients affected by AMR. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm the beneficial effects of ECP in the setting of AMR.

Background Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) therapy has proved to be an effective and safe treatment for graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), an important complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In 2016, we acquired Therakos CellEx, a dedicated inline ECP device to accomplish a significant increase in ECP activity. In literature, we found few data reporting CellEx performance evaluated in terms of collection efficiency to qualify the device. Hence, we decided to collect and analyze our data in order to build a reference in terms of expected results of the procedure. Here we report our data of ECP performed using CellEx in a 12-month period focusing on collection efficiency assessment, as well as procedural and apheretic product characteristics. Study design and methods We collected data of patients undergoing ECP from April 2018 to March 2019 using CellEx in order to evaluate collection efficiency. Results Between April 2018 and March 2019 we treated 28 adult patients affected by GvHD performing 319 ECP using CellEx. CellEx mononuclear cell product was characterized by high mononuclear cell percentage and low percentage of granulocytes, resulting particularly suitable for ECP treatments. Median collection efficiency for total nucleated cells and for mononuclear cells was 31.2% and 62.3%, respectively. Conclusion Collection efficiency of CellEx was comparable to that usually obtained by cell separators designed for cell collection and was comparable to that of offline systems. Our results provide a detailed performance evaluation for inline ECP system users.

Aim:To present well-known and disputable mechanisms of the effects of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) in heterogeneous clinical conditions, as well as to demonstrate its advantages over conventional hormonal, immunosuppressive and cytostatic treatments, with a recommendation to widely implement it into practical management of autoimmune disease and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs).Key points:Despite convincing evidence of the ECP efficacy in the treatment of T-cell mediated disorders, a unifying concept of its mechanism has not been established so far. In this review, we attempted to determine the value of multiple, sometimes contradictory and equivocal points of view to immunobiochemical processes underlying the restoration of mechanism of immune tolerance in some autoimmune diseases and CTCLs. We focused our attention on our own clinical and immunological data obtained during a 20-years' experience with the use of ECP in clinical departments of MONIKI (Russia). Based on this, we have shown that ECP is more effective in autoimmune diseases than conventional treatment approaches with hormones, immunosuppressants and cytostatics. Unlike them, ECP is selectively targeted to auto-aggressive T-cells without induction of systemic immunosuppression. The leading role is played by the transformation of activated (immunogenic) myeloid dendrite cells (DC) into tolerogenic cell associated with their synthesis of inhibitor cytokines. The interplay of the cytokines with an antigen results in polarization of CD4+ Т lymphocytes via the Th2 pathway with restoration of the Th1/Th2 balance and their cytokine production. ECP triggers regulatory anti-clonotypic effector memory cells at the end stage of CD3+/CD8+/CD27-/CD28-/CD62L+ differentiation, that provide and maintain the peripheral immune tolerance, by deletion of the clone of auto-reactive cytotoxic lymphocytes and inducing their apoptosis. In autoimmune disorders, ECP results in reduction of the expression of integrin adhesion molecules on auto-reactive cell membranes with subsequent loss of their ability to migrate through the endothelium to their target cells. In its turn, it leads to decreasing immunoinflammatory response in the lesion. Both clinical and experimental data indicate that the mechanism of ECP action against CTCLs is characterized by activation of tumor cell apoptosis, unblocking of co-activation receptors on the antigen-presenting DC providing the functioning of the second signaling pathway for T lymphocyte activation. This results in proliferation of anti-tumor effector cells pool, production of DC activating cytokines that participate in the CD4+ polarization via Th1 pathway. In addition, this review considers the mechanism of the immunomodulating effect of ECP in the context of its influence at the levels of transcription and translation of proteins contributing to the pathophysiology of the disorders, based on molecular immunogenetic studies. Thus, ECP is able to induce antigen-specific immunological tolerance through the transformation of antigen-presenting cells, modulation of cytokine profile, adhesion and activation molecules, as well as through formatting of the regulatory T cells (Tregs).Conclusion:Undoubtedly, the immunobiological ECP technique has significant advantages over well-known conventional hormonal, immunosuppressive, and cytostatic therapies of autoimmune diseases and CTCLs.

Extracorporeal therapy is a treatment modality where human blood undergoes favorable technical modifications and is reintroduced into the same patient. Since the last four decades this technique has been deployed in the management of difficult and refractory disorders in dermatology. Over a period of time newer techniques like immunoadsorption has emerged and opened new vistas in management of morbid dermatoses. In extracorporeal photopheresis a patient's leukocytes are separated and treated outside with Ultra Violet A in presence of 8-methoxypsoralen. Double filtration plasmapheresis and Immunoadsorption are techniques to remove offending immune complexes. They are safe and reduce the need of toxic medications that are conventionally used in recalcitrant skin diseases. In recent years immunoadsorption is emerging as first-line therapy in condition like immunobullous diseases. High cost is one of the important factors limiting their wider use in developing countries like India. Our review discusses different extracorporeal therapies, their applications, recommendations and guidelines based on various clinical trials.

BACKGROUND The off-line extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) procedure requires photosensitization in an external cell therapy laboratory as per the French regulatory requirement. This regulation results in higher time and costs compared with the on-line alternative performed entirely at the patient's bedside. Recently, full in situ execution of the off-line procedure has been implemented in the Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital Hemobiotherapy Department (Paris, France). This report summarizes the center's experience regarding the organizational and costs impacts of this change compared with the on-line procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS ECP was broken down into stages, and several procedures were monitored prospectively in real-life settings. The total costs associated with both procedures were the sum of the fixed costs and variable costs related to all stages of the procedures, nursing-time costs, property costs, and patient-related production loss costs. RESULTS Eight off-line ECP and fourteen on-line ECP procedures were monitored during five consecutive days. Procedure duration was not different (median 137.5 vs 154.0 minutes, P = .29). Times and costs associated with nursing were higher but offset by lower fixed costs of the off-line ECP. Total direct costs per procedure associated with using the off-line ECP were significantly lower than those of the on-line procedure (459.6 ± 7.1 EUR vs 953.8 ± 6.5 EUR; P = .0002). Similar results were observed when including the costs of patient production loss. CONCLUSIONS As a competitive time procedure, the in situ off-line method proved to be cost-efficient by effectively offering similar patient treatment per year compared with the on-line procedure.

Introduction: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a serious complication in allogeneic transplantation. The first-line treatment is high doses of corticosteroids. In the absence of response to corticosteroids, several immunosuppressive drugs can be used, but they entail an elevated risk of severe infections. Added to this, there are patients who do not improve on any immunosuppressive treatment, with subsequent deteriorated quality of life and high mortality. Ruxolitinib has been shown to induce responses in refractory patients. In this study we have presented our real-life experience. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with severe GVHD refractory to corticosteroids. Demographic, previous treatment, response and mortality data were collected. Results: Since 2014, seventeen patients with GVHD were treated with ruxolitinib due to refractoriness to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants and a few to extracorporeal photopheresis, 8 with acute GVHD (1 pulmonary, 4 cutaneous grade IV and 3 digestive grade IV) and 9 with chronic GHVD (5 cutaneous sclerodermiform, 2 pulmonary and 1 multisystemic). The overall response to ruxolitinib treatment for acute GVHD was 80%, 40% with partial response and 40% with complete remission. Global response in chronic GVHD was 79%. The GVHD mortality was only seen in acute disease and was 40%. Causes of mortality in those patients were severe viral pneumonia, post-transplantation hemophagocytic syndrome and meningeal GVHD refractory to ruxolitinib. Conclusions: In our series, the use of ruxolitinib as a rescue strategy in acute or chronic GVHD was satisfactory. Ruxolitinib treatment in patients with a very poor prognosis showed encouraging results. However, the GVHD mortality remains high in refractory patients, showing that better therapeutic strategies are needed.