Search

OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiology of electrical fatalities in Western Australia between 1976 and 1990. DATA SOURCES: Data for the study were gathered from hospital records, autopsy reports and findings from State Energy Commission and coronal investigations. DATA EXTRACTION: Information that was abstracted included age, sex, occupation, voltage, history of incident and autopsy findings. DATA SYNTHESIS: There were 104 victims. Death occurred most frequently in young men exposed to low voltage current during summer, and nearly half the fatalities occurred in the workplace. Water was present in up to 52% of fatalities. Without exception, all victims developed a lethal arrhythmia at the time of exposure to the electric shock, which usually resulted in death at the scene. CONCLUSION: When a victim is exposed to a fatal electric shock, the lethal arrhythmia occurs at the time of electrocution and is just as likely to occur at home as in the workplace. Electrical fatalities can be prevented largely by the use of residual current devices.

This study assessed the efficacy of buffered lidocaine in children and adults for the repair of simple lacerations. We compared plain lidocaine (PL) with buffered lidocaine (BL) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Children had a 10-point pain score assessed by a nurse using predetermined behavior criteria, and a visual analog pain score (VAS) as perceived by the parent. Adult visual analog scores were self reported. In 135 adults, the median VAS was 2.1 for PL and 2.0 for BL. In 136 children, the median nurse-rated pain score was 4.5 for both PL and BL. The parent’s median VAS was 4.5 for PL and 4.0 for BL. In contrast to previous studies, we conclude that buffered lidocaine does not reduce infiltration pain in children or adults.

Background Prospective human studies of anaphylaxis and its mechanisms have been limited, with few severe cases or examining only 1 or 2 mediators. Objectives We wanted to define the clinical patterns of anaphylaxis and relationships between mediators and severity. Methods Data were collected during treatment and before discharge. Serial blood samples were taken for assays of mast cell tryptase, histamine, anaphylatoxins (C3a, C4a, C5a), cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10), soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I, and platelet activating factor acetyl hydrolase. Principal component analysis defined mediator patterns, and logistic regression identified risk factors and mediator patterns associated with reaction severity and delayed reactions. Results Of 412 reactions in 402 people, 315 met the definition for anaphylaxis by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network. Of 97 severe reactions 45 (46%) were hypotensive, 23 (24%) were hypoxemic, and 29 (30%) were mixed. One patient died. Severe reactions were associated with older age, pre-existing lung disease, and drug causation. Delayed deteriorations treated with epinephrine occurred in 29 of 315 anaphylaxis cases (9.2%) and were more common after hypotensive reactions and with pre-existing lung disease. Twenty-two of the 29 delayed deteriorations (76%) occurred within 4 hours of initial epinephrine treatment. Of the remaining 7 cases, 2 were severe and occurred after initially severe reactions, within 10 hours. All mediators were associated with severity, and 1 group (mast cell tryptase, histamine, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor receptor I) was also associated with delayed deteriorations. Low platelet activating factor acetyl hydrolase activity was associated with severe reactions. Conclusion The results suggest that multiple inflammatory pathways drive reaction severity and support recommendations for safe observation periods after initial treatment.

Study objective: To evaluate the efficacy of oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) and buffered lidocaine in reducing the anxiety associated with the repair of childhood lacerations. Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Community-based emergency department. Participants: Children younger than 10 years. Interventions: Each subject was randomized into one of four treatment groups: A, midazolam and buffered lidocaine (n=25); B, placebo and buffered lidocaine (n=27); C, midazolam and plain lidocaine (n=32); and D, placebo and plain lidocaine (n=23). Results: Anxiety level was scored on a scale of 1 to 4 on the basis of predetermined behavior criteria before and during repair. Parents independently rated the child's distress using a visual analog scale. Vital signs were measured on admission and at discharge. There were no significant differences among the treatment groups for age, location and length of laceration, or initial anxiety scores. Midazolam decreased the number of children with anxiety levels 3 and 4 by 24% (95% CI, 7.5% to 41.3%). There was a 33% reduction of the parents' distress rating with midazolam ( P Conclusion: Oral midazolam (0.3 mg/kg) is a safe and effective treatment for reducing anxiety during the suturing of lacerations in children less than 10 years of age. In this study, buffered lidocaine had no effect on anxiety level. [Fatovich DM, Jacobs IG: A randomized, controlled trial of oral midazolam and buffered lidocaine for suturing lacerations in children (the SLIC Trial). Ann Emerg Med February 1995;25:209-214.]

www.thelancet.com Vol 380 September 22, 2012 1053 Submissions should be made via our electronic submission system at http://ees.elsevier.com/ thelancet/ 2 Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, et al. Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2012; 379: 2364–72. 3 Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4·5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1317–29. 4 Leys D, Cordonnier C. rt-PA for ischaemic stroke: what will the next question be? Lancet 2012; 379: 2320–21. Thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke

The letters by Kaye and Ferguson highlight some issues in the controversy on this subject.1 However, it is important to look at the totality of the evidence in more detail. The most recently published independent review on this subject concluded that ‘there is no consistent or proven benefit to thrombolytics.’2 This review also highlights the problems with the pooled analyses, which have been incorrectly labelled as a ‘meta-analysis’ in …

Emergency physicians need to be alert to the potential effects of electric shock in pregnancy. A review of all case reports in the English language literature of pregnant women exposed to electric shock was performed. Information on voltage, gestation, injury-to-delivery interval, and outcome was collected. There were 15 victims of electric shock in pregnancy. Fetal mortality (N = 11) was 73% and there was only one normal pregnancy following electric shock. The fetus is much less resistant to electric shock than the mother. Any woman who suffers from an electric shock in pregnancy, however minor, requires prompt fetal monitoring and careful obstetric supervision.

The editorial by Wallin and Fladby highlights the clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging as a marker of small vessel disease in elderly people.1 Prevalence ranges from 11-21% at age 64 …

Physicians and the public often assume that herbal preparations are harmless. Aconite is a Chinese herb used as an analgesic by homeopaths; its chief effects are on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. The first two reported cases of aconite poisoning in Australia are described.

We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous lidocaine (1 mg/kg) in the treatment of acute migraine. Thirteen subjects were randomly allocated to receive intravenous lidocaine and 12 received intravenous normal saline. Subjects scored the intensity of headache and nausea on separate visual analogue scales before the injection and at 10 and 20 min after injection. At 20 min, the mean pain intensity score was 80% of initial intensity in the lidocaine group and 82% in the placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant; at 20 min, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the two groups in mean percentage of initial pain score was 2 ± 29%. At the dose studied, intravenous lidocaine has, at best, only a modest effect in acute migraine.

OBJECTIVE To decide who should be monitored after exposure to household 240 volt 50 Hz alternating current electric shocks. DESIGN AND SETTING Records of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of Royal Perth Hospital for the period 1978-1987 were retrospectively reviewed. A literature review was also performed to compare previous findings with our own (Medline search; keywords--electrical injury, arrhythmia). RESULTS There were 20 patients in the series, and all patients survived the electric shock. Of the 18 who presented with no cardiovascular symptoms or electrocardiographic abnormalities, none developed arrhythmias while being monitored in the Intensive Care Unit. CONCLUSION Routine cardiac monitoring is not required after electric shock with household alternating current if the patient is asymptomatic and has a normal electrocardiogram on presentation.

To report our experience monitoring patients with previously identified theoretical risk factors of significant electrical injury.Patients who presented to one of 21 emergency departments between October 2000 and November 2004 were eligible to be enrolled in a prospective observational cohort study if after an electric shock they had one of several risk factors (transthoracic current, tetany, loss of consciousness or voltage sourceor =1000 V) and therefore needed cardiac monitoring.Of the 134 patients enrolled, most were monitored because of transthoracic current (n = 60), transthoracic current and tetany (n = 39), tetany (n = 10), or voltageor =1000 V (n = 10). There were 15/134 (11%) patients with abnormal initial ECGs. No patient developed potentially lethal late arrhythmia during the 24 hours of cardiac monitoring.Although only patients deemed at risk of late arrhythmias were monitored, none developed potentially lethal late arrhythmias. Asymptomatic patients with transthoracic current and/or tetany and a normal initial ECG do not require cardiac monitoring after an electrical injury with voltage1000 V and no loss of consciousness.

Advanced Life Support Group BMJ Books, £40, pp 512 ISBN 0 7279 1464 2 Rating: ![Graphic][1] ![Graphic][2] ![Graphic][3] Acute hospital medicine is widely practised around the world but is not often recognised as requiring special expertise. The authors of this text have done a splendid job of crafting an approach that is rooted in the real world. They have obviously dealt with real patients … [1]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif

Understanding longer term outcomes in critically ill patients will assist treatment decisions, allocation of scarce resources and clinical research in that population. The aim of this study was to compare a well-validated means of determining comorbidity, the Charlson Comorbidity Score, to other verified risk stratification models in predicting one-year mortality and other outcomes in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and sepsis with shock. We conducted a planned subgroup analysis of a prospective observational study, the Critical Illness and Shock Study, in adult patients with sepsis meeting study criteria for critical illness. From emergency department arrival, patients were prospectively enrolled with data collected for a minimum of one year post-enrolment. Scoring systems were derived from this data and compared using receiver-operating characteristic curves. One hundred and four patients were enrolled. The 28-day mortality was 18% and one-year mortality 40%. For predicting one-year mortality, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for age-weighted Charlson Comorbidity Score (0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.81) was at least as good or superior to other scoring systems analysed. The intensive care unit admission rate was 45% and the median hospital length-of-stay was eight days. We conclude that in patients who present to the emergency department with severe sepsis or sepsis with shock, age-weighted Charlson Comorbidity Score is a predictor of one-year mortality that is simple to calculate and at least as accurate as other validated scoring systems.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate telephone advice given in an emergency department. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: A community-based emergency department in a semi-rural/outer metropolitan setting, between August and November 1995. PARTICIPANTS: All people telephoning the emergency department for medical advice. METHODS: Details of all calls, callers and patients were recorded. Within 72 hours, a follow-up call was initiated seeking replies to a series of standardised questions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number, timing and duration of calls; appropriateness of the advice given; compliance with the advice; and callers' satisfaction with the service. RESULTS: Over the four-month period, 1682 calls were received, 58% between 4pm and midnight. There were 33 telephone calls per 100 emergency department attendances. The mean call duration was 3.9 minutes (range, 0.25-25 minutes); 49% of patients were less than 14 years old, and 72% of callers phoned because of spontaneous illness. The advice given was considered inappropriate in only 1.4% of calls. Follow-up calls were made to 1132 people (67%), revealing a non-compliance rate of only 6.9% and a high level of caller satisfaction, with 99% of callers affirming a need for such a service. CONCLUSIONS: The provision of telephone advice by emergency department staff is rated highly by the community and compliance with the advice is strong. Paediatric problems, arising as a result of spontaneous illness, predominate and there is a large bias towards after-hours use of the service. Experienced staff provide better advice.

Background As demand for Emergency Department (ED) services continues to exceed increases explained by population growth, strategies to reduce ED presentations are being explored. The concept of ambulance paramedics providing an alternative model of care to the current default ‘see and transport to ED’ has intuitive appeal and has been implemented in several locations around the world. The premise is that for certain non-critically ill patients, the Extended Care Paramedic (ECP) can either ‘see and treat’ or ‘see and refer’ to another primary or community care practitioner, rather than transport to hospital. However, there has been little rigorous investigation of which types of patients can be safely identified and managed in the community, or the impact of ECPs on ED attendance. Methods/Design St John Ambulance Western Australia paramedics will indicate on the electronic patient care record (e-PCR) of patients attended in the Perth metropolitan area if they consider them to be suitable to be managed in the community. ‘Follow-up’ will examine these patients using ED data to determine the patient’s disposition from the ED. A clinical panel will then develop a protocol to identify those patients who can be safely managed in the community. Paramedics will then assess patients against the derived ECP protocols and identify those deemed suitable to ‘see and treat’ or ‘see and refer’. The ED disposition (and other clinical outcomes) of these ‘ECP protocol identified’ patients will enable us to assess whether it would have been appropriate to manage these patients in the community. We will also ‘track’ re-presentations to EDs within seven days of the initial presentation. This is a ‘virtual experiment’ with no direct involvement of patients or changes in clinical practice. A systems modelling approach will be used to assess the likely impact on ED crowding. Discussion To date the efficacy, cost-effectiveness and safety of alternative community-based models of emergency care have not been rigorously investigated. This study will inform the development of ECP protocols through the identification of types of patient presentation that can be considered both safe and appropriate for paramedics to manage in the community.