Search

Objective: This study aimed to assess the lipid-lowering properties of omega-3 fatty acids (also known as n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids) in a group of patients taking clozapine., Method: Twenty-eight persons suffering from schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and currently taking clozapine participated in an open-label single-arm trial. Participants received supplements of 10 g of fish oil (containing 1.8 g of eicosopentaenoic acid and 1.2 g of docosahexaenoic acid) for a period of 28 days. Plasma lipids were measured on days 0 and 28., Results: This study demonstrated high rates of lipid abnormalities in the participants. Participants taking omega-3 fatty acids demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in mean serum triglyceride levels of 22%. There was an associated increase in total cholesterol (6.6%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (22%). Common side-effects included fishy burps or breath, but no serious side-effects or interactions where observed., Conclusion: Omega-3 fatty acids may be of value in patients taking clozapine and who have elevated serum triglyceride levels. Limitations of the study, practical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Treatment-refractory early-onset schizophrenia is a rare but severe form of the disorder associated with poor premorbid function and long-term disability. The currently available evidence suggests that clozapine remains the most efficacious treatment for the amelioration of both positive and negative symptoms of the disorder and problematic aggressive behaviors. Clozapine use in children and adolescents, however, is limited by its association with hematologic adverse events and an increased frequency of seizure activity. Further studies are needed to examine the usefulness of antipsychotic combinations and of augmentation therapies to antipsychotic medications in order to treat persistent residual psychotic symptoms in children and adolescents who have schizophrenia and who have not responded to several sequential trials of antipsychotic monotherapy.

The routine assessment of xenobiotic in vivo kinetic behavior is currently dependent upon data obtained through animal experimentation, although in vitro surrogates for determining key absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination properties are available. Here we present a unique, generic, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and demonstrate its application to the estimation of rat plasma pharmacokinetics, following intravenous dosing, from in vitro data alone. The model was parameterized through an optimization process, using a training set of in vivo data taken from the literature and validated using a separate test set of in vivo discovery compound data. On average, the vertical divergence of the predicted plasma concentrations from the observed data, on a semilog concentration-time plot, was approximately 0.5 log unit. Around 70% of all the predicted values of a standardized measure of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were within 3-fold of the observed values, as were over 90% of the training set t1/2 predictions and 60% of those for the test set; however, there was a tendency to overpredict t1/2 for the test set compounds. The capability of the model to rank compounds according to a given criterion was also assessed: of the 25% of the test set compounds ranked by the model as having the largest values for AUC, 61% were correctly identified. These validation results lead us to conclude that the generic PBPK model is potentially a powerful and cost-effective tool for predicting the mammalian pharmacokinetics of a wide range of organic compounds, from readily available in vitro inputs only.

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization hyphenated with quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has been used to directly determine the distribution of pharmaceuticals in rat brain tissue slices which might unravel their disposition for new drug development. Clozapine, an antipsychotic drug, and norclozapine were used as model compounds to investigate fundamental parameters such as matrix and solvent effects and irradiance dependence on MALDI intensity but also to address the issues with direct tissue imaging MS technique such as (1) uniform coating by the matrix, (2) linearity of MALDI signals, and (3) redistribution of surface analytes. The tissue sections were coated with various matrices on MALDI plates by airspray deposition prior to MS detection. MALDI signals of analytes were detected by monitoring the dissociation of the individual protonated molecules to their predominant MS/MS product ions. The matrices were chosen for tissue applications based on their ability to form a homogeneous coating of dense crystals and to yield greater sensitivity. Images revealing the spatial localization in tissue sections using MALDI-QTOF following a direct infusion of (3)H-clozapine into rat brain were found to be in good correlation with those using a radioautographic approach. The density of clozapine and its major metabolites from whole brain homogenates was further confirmed using fast high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) procedures., (Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Clozapine, a lipophilic effective atypical antipsychotic drug, has very poor oral bioavailability (<27%) due to first pass effect. Clozapine solid lipid nanoparticles have been developed using various triglycerides (trimyristin, tripalmitin and tristearin), soylecithin 95%, poloxamer 188 and stearylamine as a positive charge inducer by hot homogenization followed by ultrasonication method. Particle size and charge measurements were made with Malvern Zetasizer. Pharmacokinetics of clozapine incorporated in solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs), after intravenous (i.v.) administration to conscious male Wistar rats were studied. The aim of this research was to find out whether the bioavailability of clozapine can be improved by administering clozapine SLN duodenally to rats. Tissue distribution studies of clozapine SLN and suspension were carried out in Swiss albino mice. Average size and zeta potential of SLNs of different lipids with stearylamine ranged from 96.7+/-3.8 to 163.3+/-0.7 nm and 21.3+/-1.3 to 33.2+/-0.6 mV, respectively. AUC((0-infinity)) was increased (up to 2.91-fold) and clearance was decreased (up to 2.93-fold) when clozapine entrapped in SLNs with stearylamine were administered intravenously. Bioavailability of clozapine SLNs were 2.45- to 4.51-fold after intraduodenal administration compared with that of clozapine suspension. In tested organs, the AUC and MRT of clozapine SLNs were higher than those of clozapine suspension especially in brain and reticuloendothelial cell-containing organs. These results indicate that SLN are suitable drug delivery system for the improvement of bioavailability of lipophilic drugs such as clozapine.

Highly variable plasma concentrations are found in patients receiving the same dose of clozapine. Therefore, rational dose adjustment of clozapine that is guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can improve efficacy while reducing risk of toxicity. As a background to the discussion of the use of TDM for clozapine, the pharmacodynamics and pathways of clozapine biotransformation are first reviewed, in particular the role of the primary enzymes involved. These are CYP1A2, the primary enzyme involved in converting clozapine to norclozapine, and CYP3A4, the primary enzyme involved in converting clozapine to clozapine-N-oxide. The factors that can influence plasma levels of clozapine are next reviewed; these include dose, gender, smoking, age, body weight, caffeine intake, and drug-drug interactions. The authors then examine the concentration-dependent toxicity of clozapine based on a review of published data. Finally, the authors present four cases illustrating the issues involved and how TMD can be used to improve clinical care of patients being treated with clozapine, both in terms of improving efficacy and minimizing potential toxicity.

We report on a 28-year-old white woman with chronic psychotic-affective illness who abruptly stopped her decade-long habit of heavy daily cigarette smoking while maintained on clozapine at 450 mg/d. Within several days, she developed dry mouth, muscle spasms, dizziness, and blurred vision with dilated and sluggish pupils, with worsening sedation and confusion. Her combined serum concentration of clozapine + norclozapine was 2.5 microg/mL, compared with levels of about 600 ng/mL at daily doses of 350 mg at other times while smoking. Reducing the dose of clozapine led to rapid alleviation of these symptoms. Additional experience with and without smoking in this case further documented the effect of smoking to decrease circulating levels of clozapine. These observations add to the conclusion that cigarette smoke can increase clearance of many drugs, calling for special caution during treatment with potentially toxic substances and dose reduction in anticipation of smoking cessation.

2-[4-(3,4-Dimethylphenlyl)piperazin-1-ylmethyl]-1H benzoimidazole (A-381393) was identified as a potent dopamine D4 receptor antagonist with excellent receptor selectivity. [3H]-spiperone competition binding assays showed that A-381393 potently bound to membrane from cells expressing recombinant human dopamine D4.4 receptor (Ki=1.5 nM), which was 20-fold higher than that of clozapine (Ki=30.4 nM). A-381393 exhibited highly selective binding for the dopamine D4.4 receptor (>2700-fold) when compared to D1, D2, D3 and D5 dopamine receptors. Furthermore, in comparison to clozapine and L-745870, A-381393 exhibits better receptor selectivity, showing no affinity up to 10 microM for a panel of more than 70 receptors and channels, with the exception of moderate affinity for 5-HT2A (Ki=370 nM). A-381393 potently inhibited the functional activity of agonist-induced GTP-gamma-S binding assay and 1 microM dopamine induced-Ca2+ flux in human dopamine D4.4 receptor expressing cells, but not in human dopamine D2L or D3 receptor cells. In contrast to L-745870, A-381393 did not exhibit any significant intrinsic activity in a D4.4 receptor. In vivo, A-381393 has good brain penetration after subcutaneous administration. A-381393 inhibited penile erection induced by the selective D4 agonist PD168077 in conscious rats. Thus, A-381393 is a novel selective D4 antagonist that will enhance the ability to study dopamine D4 receptors both in vitro and in vivo.

We aimed to analyze the risks of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) induced by typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs using a common pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model based on the receptor occupancy. We collected the data for EPS induced by atypical antipsychotics, risperidone, olanzapine and quetiapine, and a typical antipsychotic, haloperidol from literature and analyzed the following five indices of EPS, the ratio of patients obliged to take anticholinergic medication, the occurrence rates of plural extrapyramidal symptoms (more than one of tremor, dystonia, hypokinesia, akathisia, extrapyramidal syndrome, etc.), parkinsonism, akathisia, and extrapyramidal syndrome. We tested two models, i.e., a model incorporating endogenous dopamine release owing to 5-HT2A receptor inhibition and a model not considering the endogenous dopamine release, and used them to examine the relationship between the D2 receptor occupancy of endogenous dopamine and the extent of drug-induced EPS. The model incorporating endogenous dopamine release better described the relationship between the mean D2 receptor occupancy of endogenous dopamine and the extent of EPS than the other model, as assessed by the final sum of squares of residuals (final SS) and Akaike's Information Criteria (AIC). Furthermore, the former model could appropriately predict the risks of EPS induced by two other atypical antipsychotics, clozapine and ziprasidone, which were not incorporated into the model development. The developed model incorporating endogenous dopamine release owing to 5-HT2A receptor inhibition may be useful for the prediction of antipsychotics-induced EPS.

The UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) family plays a major role in the excretion of endobiotics and xenobiotics and their metabolites. Human UGT1A4 catalyzes the glucuronidation of primary, secondary, and tertiary amines, sapogenins, androgens, and progestins. We directly sequenced polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments of the UGT1A4 gene from 100 healthy adult Japanese volunteers and calculated their mutation frequency. We identified four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): three in exon 1 (142T > G: L48V, 448T > C: L150L, 804G > A: P268P), and one in intron 1 (867 + 43C > T). We found three types of alleles with distinct SNP combinations that coded for different amino acid sequences: L48V-L150L-P268P-867 + 43C > T (frequency, 0.155), L48V (0.01), and P268P (0.01) (wild-type frequency was 0.825). The L48V mutant gave twice the efficiency (V(max)/K(m)) for the antipsychotic drug clozapine as the wild-type. Efficiencies of L48V for trans-androsterone, imipramine, and cyproheptadine were increased, but the efficiency for tigogenin was reduced. L48V therefore increased or decreased the glucuronidation activity, depending upon the substrates. This study shows the importance of identifying patients with the L48V polymorphism when calculating dosage, and when considering the potential adverse effects of drugs that are substrates of UGT1A4.

Drug-drug interactions or genetic variability may require using doses different from those recommended for atypical antipsychotics. Dosage alterations of olanzapine and clozapine, dependent on cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) for clearance, and quetiapine, dependent on cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A), may be necessary when used with other drugs that inhibit or induce their metabolic enzymes. Smoking cessation can significantly increase clozapine, and perhaps olanzapine, levels. Ziprasidone pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions are not likely to be important. Genetic variations of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) and drug-drug interactions causing inhibition (CYP2D6 and/or CYP3A) or induction (CYP3A) may be important for risperidone, and perhaps for aripiprazole, dosing. Adding inhibitors may cause side effects more easily in drugs with a narrow therapeutic window, such as clozapine or risperidone, than in those with a wide therapeutic window, such as olanzapine or aripiprazole. Adding inducers may be associated with a gradual development of lost efficacy.

Background: The atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine is metabolized by CYP1A2. The activity of CYP1A2 is highly variable and is among others dependent on smoking habits. Certain genotypes of CYP1A2 have been associated with increased inducibility/activity of CYP1A2. However, the relevance of genotyping for these mutations in a clinical setting has not yet been demonstrated., Methods: In this study, the CYP1A2 *1F, *1C and *1D genotypes of 58 schizophrenic patients on clozapine treatment were correlated with clozapine serum concentrations corrected for dose and weight or concentration/dosage ratios., Results: The allele frequency of *1F and *1D was 67% and 6%, respectively. With an allele frequency of 1%, the occurrence of *1C was very low. Multivariate analysis of variance did not reveal any significant correlations between CYP1A2 genotypes and clozapine clearance in these subjects, although a possible effect of the *1D allele cannot be excluded in this study., Conclusion: Although this study was performed using samples from a limited number of patients, routine genotyping of CYP1A2 *1F, *1C or *1D polymorphisms for their effect on metabolic capacity is, at least in Caucasians, not yet indicated.

The pharmacokinetic interaction between clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic with metabolic complications, including weight gain, and green tea consumption has not been evaluated, although green tea is responsible for beneficial effects, including weight reduction, and is widely consumed in the world. Commercial green tea extract (175 mg kg(-1)) or saline was administered orally for 4 days before the oral administration of clozapine (20 mg kg(-1) ) to rats. Plasma concentrations of clozapine were measured up to 5 h after clozapine administration, and then hepatic CYP1A2 expression and activity were determined. There was no significant difference in the elimination half-life of clozapine between the green tea extract and saline groups. However, the time to reach peak concentration (T(max)) was significantly increased by green tea extract. The mean total area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximal peak plasma concentration (C(max)) of clozapine in the green tea extract group were significantly lower than those of controls. Green tea extract induced a approximately 2-fold increase in hepatic CYP1A2 levels, while the activity increased slightly (by 10% of control). Because of this reduction in AUC and T(max) of clozapine by green tea extract pretreatment, we suggest that both the rate and amount of absorption of clozapine may be reduced by green tea extract, although the hepatic elimination phase may not be significantly altered. Therefore, the clinical implications of the effects of green tea on the bioavailability of clozapine in patients should be further evaluated.

Clozapine works better and produces fewer side effects than other antipsychotics. Existing hypotheses fail to explain why. A new hypothesis, single spike suppression, supposes that psychotic symptoms are mediated by the single spikes of neurons at the D2 receptor. All antipsychotics block these spikes. Clozapine, according to the hypothesis, blocks these spikes but, unlike other antipsychotics, spares the spike bursts that mediate movement, cognition and affect. This study explores the mathematical feasibility of single spike suppression. Could an antipsychotic with the right receptor kinetics selectively block single spikes? Could this selectivity have clinical consequences? To develop the hypothesis, the author made a mathematical model of the receptor occupancy of a synapse, and performed five simulations, varying input data within the range established by research. The effects of hypothetical antipsychotics on single spikes and bursts were compared. The author confirmed that a drug with the right dissociation rate constant (k off) would dissociate slowly enough to block single spikes, but rapidly enough to spare longer bursts. If the hypothesis is correct, this spike-selective, burst-sparing drug would work at relatively low D2 occupancies, and cause minimal D2-related side effects. Single spike suppression may explain the superior properties of clozapine better than competing hypotheses. If so, it would provide a better model for a new generation of safe, effective antipsychotics.

Background: While the incidence of new-onset diabetes mellitus may be increasing in patients with schizophrenia treated with certain atypical antipsychotic agents, it remains unclear whether atypical agents are directly affecting glucose metabolism or simply increasing known risk factors for diabetes., Objective: To study the 2 drugs most clearly implicated (clozapine and olanzapine) and risperidone using a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test., Design: A cross-sectional design in stable, treated patients with schizophrenia evaluated using a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test and the Bergman minimal model analysis., Setting: Subjects were recruited from an urban community mental health clinic and were studied at a general clinical research center. Patients Fifty subjects signed informed consent and 41 underwent the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Thirty-six nonobese subjects with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, matched by body mass index and treated with either clozapine, olanzapine, or risperidone, were included in the analysis., Main Outcome Measures: Fasting plasma glucose and fasting serum insulin levels, insulin sensitivity index, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, and glucose effectiveness., Results: The mean +/- SD duration of treatment with the identified atypical antipsychotic agent was 68.3 +/- 28.9 months (clozapine), 29.5 +/- 17.5 months (olanzapine), and 40.9 +/- 33.7 (risperidone). Fasting serum insulin concentrations differed among groups (F(33) = 3.35; P = .047) (clozapine>olanzapine>risperidone) with significant differences between clozapine and risperidone (t(33) = 2.32; P = .03) and olanzapine and risperidone (t(33) = 2.15; P = .04). There was a significant difference in insulin sensitivity index among groups (F(33) = 10.66; P<.001) (clozapineolanzapine>risperidone) (clozapine vs risperidone, t(33) = 2.94; P = .006; olanzapine vs risperidone, t(33) = 2.42; P = .02). There was a significant difference among groups in glucose effectiveness (F(30) = 4.18; P = .02) (clozapine

A key goal of the pharmacologic treatment of acute bipolar mania is rapid symptom improvement. Medications commonly used to attain this goal include lithium, several anticonvulsants, and both first- and second-generation antipsychotics. Second-generation antipsychotics, which are associated with substantially lower rates of extrapyramidal side effects than first-generation agents, are becoming a mainstay in the treatment of acute mania. Although their efficacy appears to be comparable, second-generation antipsychotics may differ in time to onset and in their side effect profiles. Therefore, selecting a second-generation antipsychotic requires consideration of how an agent's efficacy, onset of action, and adverse events profile influence its appropriateness for each patient.

Controlled release formulations of clozapine microparticulated tablets were prepared by using chitosan. Microparticles were characterized for particle size and size distribution. Microparticles were compressed into tablets using the directly compressible excipients. SEM photographs of the fractured part of the tablet revealed the presence of discrete particles in the tablets, suggesting that the system chosen is ideal for tableting. Drug release from the tableted microparticles exhibited an initial burst effect, but the release decreased with increasing extent of cross-linking. Tablets were coated with chitosan or cellulose acetate, which significantly lowered the initial burst effect when compared to uncoated tablets. Drug release from chitosan-coated tablets was slightly higher than the tablets coated with cellulose acetate. Tablets prepared were effective in delivering clozapine over a period of 12 h.

We report the results of a double-blind, randomized prospective trial on D2 and 5-HT2 receptor occupancy and the clinical effects of olanzapine versus clozapine in a sample of neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenic patients. Receptor occupancy was evaluated in different cortical areas and in basal ganglia using [18F] fluoro-ethyl-spiperone ([18F] FESP) and positron emission tomography (PET). A total of 15 neuroleptic-free patients completed the study undergoing a baseline and a post-treatment PET scan (olanzapine, nine patients, one female; clozapine, six patients, three female) 8 weeks after starting treatment. PET data were analysed both by regions of interest and on a voxel-by-voxel basis using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM96). Olanzapine and clozapine induced a similar and significant inhibition of [18F] FESP binding index in the cortex. In the basal ganglia, receptor occupancy was significantly higher with olanzapine than with clozapine (p=0.0018). By contrast, no differences in receptor occupancy were detected at the level of the pituitary gland. Clinical outcomes, in particular a full extra pyramidal tolerability, were similar. In this sample of neuroleptic-refractory schizophrenic patients, olanzapine and clozapine showed a different pattern of occupancy of D2-like receptor despite a common lack of extrapyramidal side-effects.

Objective: Clozapine, the prototype of atypical antipsychotics, remains unique in its efficacy in the treatment of refractory schizophrenia. Its affinity for dopamine D(4) receptors, serotonin 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, effects on the noradrenergic system, and its relatively moderate occupancy of D(2) receptors are unlikely to be the critical mechanism underlying its efficacy. In an attempt to elucidate the molecular/synaptic mechanism underlying clozapine's distinctiveness in refractory schizophrenia, the authors studied the in vivo D(1) and D(2) receptor profile of clozapine compared with other atypical antipsychotics., Method: Positron emission tomography with the radioligands [(11)C]SCH23390 and [(11)C]raclopride was used to investigate D(1) and D(2) receptor occupancy in vivo in 25 schizophrenia patients receiving atypical antipsychotic treatment with clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone., Results: Mean striatal D(1) occupancies ranged from 55% with clozapine to 12% with quetiapine (rank order: clozapine > olanzapine > risperidone > quetiapine). The striatal D(2) occupancy ranged from 81% with risperidone to 30% with quetiapine (rank order: risperidone > olanzapine > clozapine > quetiapine). The ratio of striatal D(1)/D(2) occupancy was significantly higher for clozapine (0.88) relative to olanzapine (0.54), quetiapine (0.41), or risperidone (0.31)., Conclusions: Among the atypical antipsychotics, clozapine appears to have a simultaneous and equivalent occupancy of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors. Whether its effect on D(1) receptors represents agonism or antagonism is not yet clear, as this issue is still unresolved in the preclinical arena. This distinctive effect on D(1)/D(2) receptors may be responsible for clozapine's unique effectiveness in patients with schizophrenia refractory to other typical and atypical antipsychotics.

Increasing evidence suggests that the cholinergic system is involved in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Donepezil, a central cholinesterase inhibitor, improves psychotic symptomatology in demented patients, however, evidence for its role in the management of active psychosis in schizophrenia remains limited. An 18-week double blind cross-over study was conducted in which eight patients were randomly assigned to either donepezil (5 mg/day for the first 4 weeks and 10 mg/day for the following 4 weeks) or placebo as augmentation treatment to clozapine. After this initial phase, there was a 2-week washout period of the study medication after which the same regimen was crossed over at the same dose and for the same period (8 weeks). No significant difference was noted in the total positive and negative symptom scale scores when donepezil was compared with placebo (16.7%+12.97% vs 3.20%+13.94% respectively, p = 0.18). However, three patients improved (>15%) in the total PANSS scores (37.03%, 16.6% and 25.33%) during the donepezil treatment phase, while only one patient improved (20.87%) during the placebo phase. No differences were noted in the Calgary depression scale (p = 0.305), Simpson Angus scale (p = 0.374), clinical global impression-improvement scale (p = 0.23) and clinical global impression-severity of illness scores (p = 0.116). Although this preliminary study failed to demonstrate a clear effect of donepezil augmentation in clozapine treated chronic schizophrenia patients, it seems that the subtle positive effect of donepezil observed in some of our patients should encourage further investigation in a larger sample of this patient subpopulation., (Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

The combination of atypical antipsychotics and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors is an effective strategy in the treatment of certain psychiatric disorders. However, pharmacokinetic interactions between the two classes of drugs remain to be explored. The present study was designed to determine whether there were different effects of steady-state fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of olanzapine and clozapine in healthy male volunteers. One single dose of 10 mg olanzapine (n = 12) or clozapine (n = 9) was administered orally. Following a drug washout of at least 4 weeks, all subjects received fluvoxamine (100 mg/day) for 9 days, and one single dose of 10 mg olanzapine or clozapine was added on day 4. Plasma concentrations of olanzapine, clozapine, and N-desmethylclozapine were assayed at serial time points after the antipsychotics were given alone and when added to fluvoxamine. No bioequivalence was found in olanzapine alone and cotreatment with fluvoxamine for the mean peak plasma concentration (C(max)), the area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to last sampling time point (AUC(0-t)), and from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0- infinity )). Under the cotreatment, C(max) of olanzapine was significantly elevated by 49%, with a 32% reduced time (t(max)) to C(max), whereas the C(max) and t(max) of clozapine were unaltered. The cotreatment increased the AUC(0-t) and AUC(0- infinity ) of olanzapine by 68% and 76%, respectively, greater than those of clozapine (40% and 41%). The presence of fluvoxamine also prolonged the elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of olanzapine by 40% and, to a much greater extent, clozapine by 370% but reduced the total body clearance (CL/F) of clozapine (78%) more significantly than it did for olanzapine (42%). The apparent volume of distribution (V(d)) was suppressed by 31% in olanzapine combined with fluvoxamine but was unaltered in the clozapine regimen. A significant reduction in the N-desmethylclozapine to clozapine ratio was present in the clozapine with fluvoxamine regimen. The effects of fluvoxamine on different aspects of pharmacokinetics of the two antipsychotics may have implications for clinical therapeutics.

Objective: To study the effect of the replacement of omeprazole by pantoprazole on clozapine metabolism in 13 psychiatric patients, who used both clozapine and omeprazole., Method: Retrospective study of the medical files., Results: In comparison to smokers, a significant rise of the serum clozapine levels was observed in all non-smoking patients, whilst the daily dose of clozapine remained unchanged. This effect was probably caused by the discontinuation of enzyme induction of the cytochrome P450 enzyme 1A2 by omeprazole in non-smokers, whereas CYP1A2 remained induced in patients who smoked., Conclusion: Omeprazole only influenced clozapine metabolism in non-smokers. In none of the patients an adjustment of the clozapine dose was required.

A simple and commercially viable method of preparation of chitosan microparticles (MPs) was adopted for the entrapment of clozapine, which can be easily scaled-up to controlled drug delivery dosage form. This method is devoid of tedious processes like emulsification in oil phase, spray-drying, etc. MPs have been prepared by changing the experimental variables such as extent of crosslinking and amount of clozapine loading in order to optimize the process variables on the final percent drug entrapment efficiency, size of MPs and release rates. Absence of chemical interactions between drug, polymer and crosslinking agent after the production of MPs was confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained for clozapine-loaded chitosan MPs to understand the crystalline nature of the drug after entrapment. The results indicated a molecular level dispersion of clozapine in the polymer matrix. Effect of crosslinking and drug loading on thermal decomposition of chitosan was studied by thermogravimetry (TGA) and these data indicated that pure chitosan is stable when compared to clozapine-loaded chitosan. MPs produced were irregular in shape, with average particle sizes in the range of 543-698 microm as measured by the laser light scattering technique. Clozapine entrapment up to 98.97% was obtained as determined by high performance liquid chromatography. In vitro release studies were performed in phosphate buffer pH 7.4 solution and the release of clozapine was achieved up to 12 h. Swelling studies were conducted in water and diffusion coefficients (D) and diffusional exponents (n) for water transport were determined using the empirical equation. In vivo absorption kinetics of clozapine and clozapine-loaded MPs were investigated in albino rats. These results indicated that absorption of clozapine from MPs was delayed since the area under the curve was higher when compared to neat clozapine.

Unlabelled: Clozapine (CLZ), olanzapine (OLZ), risperidone (RIP) and quetiapine (QTP) have been widely used in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, no study (or little study) has been conducted to determine the four drugs simultaneously by the use of high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/ESI)., Objective: To develop a sensitive method for simultaneous determination of CLZ, OLZ, RIP and QTP in human plasma by HPLC-MS/ESI., Methods: The analytes were extracted twice by ether after samples had been alkalinized. The HPLC separation of the analytes was performed on a MACHEREY-NAGEL C(18) (2.0 mm x 125 mm, 3 microm, Germany) column, using water (formic acid: 2.70 mmol/l, ammonium acetate: 10 mmol/l)-acetonitrile (53:47) as mobile phase, with a flow-rate of 0.16 ml/min. The compounds were ionized in the electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source of the mass spectrometer and were detected in the selected ion recording (SIR) mode., Results: The calibration curves were linear in the ranges of 20-1000 ng/ml for CLZ and QTP, 1-50 ng/ml for OLZ and RIP, respectively. The average extraction recoveries for all the four analysts were at least above 80%. The methodology recoveries were higher than 91% for the analysts. The intra- and inter-day R.S.D. were less than 15%., Conclusion: The method is accurate, sensitive and simple for routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and for the study of the pharmacokinetics of the four drugs.

Schizophrenia is marked by pronounced cognitive impairments in addition to the hallmark psychotic symptoms like hallucinations. Antipsychotic drugs can effectively reduce these hallucinations; however, the drugs have not resolved the cognitive impairment. Interestingly, nicotine, a drug commonly self-administered by people with schizophrenia, has been shown to significantly improve cognitive function of people with schizophrenia. The current study was conducted to determine the effect of typical (haloperidol) and atypical (clozapine and risperidone) antipsychotic drug treatment on sustained attention in rats performing a visual signal detection task. In addition, the interaction of haloperidol with chronic nicotine administration was assessed. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were injected subcutaneously with clozapine (0, 0.6, 1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg), risperidone (0, 0.025, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg) or haloperidol (0, 0.01, 0.02 and 0.04 mg/kg). In the second part of the study, the interaction of acute haloperidol (0, 0.005, 0.01 and 0.02 mg/kg) and chronic nicotine (5 mg/kg/day, for 4 weeks via osmotic minipump) was characterized. Clozapine, risperidone and haloperidol all caused dose-related impairments in percent hit performance. There was a significant linear dose-related impairment in percent hit caused by risperidone. All the doses of clozapine caused a significant impairment in percent hit at the higher luminance intensities in the visual signal detection task. The 0.01 and 0.02 mg/kg haloperidol doses caused significant decreases in percent hit. The 0.04 mg/kg haloperidol dose impaired performance of the task to the point that reliable choice accuracy measurements could not be made. Chronic nicotine infusion significantly diminished the impairing effects of haloperidol on performance during weeks 1-2. In summary, both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs significantly impaired sustained attention in rats. Haloperidol was more detrimental than clozapine and risperidone. Chronic nicotine diminished the adverse effects of haloperidol on performance. This study establishes a paradigm to reliably determine the attentional impairment caused by antipsychotic drugs.

The development of new "atypical" antipsychotic agents, which are safer than classical neuroleptics and also active against the negative symptoms and neurocognitive deficits caused by the illness, has produced a significant advancement in the treatment of schizophrenia. The atypical (or "second generation") antipsychotics have several therapeutical properties in common, however they can significantly differ with regard to clinical potency and side effects. The main features regarding pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacological interactions of the most important atypical antipsychotics, namely clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone, are treated herein. Several analytical methods available for the therapeutic drug monitoring of these drugs are also presented, as well as the novel formulations, which can notably improve the therapy of schizophrenia. Other very recent atypical agents, such as ziprasidone, aripiprazole, iloperidone, sertindole and zotepine will also be briefly described.

The measurement of plasma clozapine concentrations is useful in assessing compliance, optimizing therapy, and minimizing toxicity. We measured plasma clozapine and norclozapine (N-desmethylclozapine) concentrations in samples from 3782 patients (2648 male, 1127 female). No clozapine was detected in 291 samples (227 patients, median prescribed dose 300 mg/d). In 4963 (50.2 %) samples (2222 patients); plasma clozapine concentration ranged from 10 to 350 ng/mL.Step-wise backward multiple regression analysis (37 % of the total samples) of log10 plasma clozapine concentration against log10 clozapine dose (mg/d), age (year), sex (male = 0, female = 1), cigarette smoking habit (nonsmokers = 0; smokers = 1), body weight (kg), and plasma clozapine/norclozapine ratio (clozapine metabolic ratio, MR) showed that these covariates explained 48% of the observed variation in plasma clozapine concentration (C = ng/mL x 10-3) (P < 0.001) according to the following equation: log 10 (C) = 0.811 log 10 (dose) + 0.332 (MR) + 69.42 X 10 (-3) (sex) + 2.263 x 10 (-3) (age) + 1.976 x 10(-3) (weight) - 0.171 (smoking habit) - 3.180. This model and its associated confidence intervals were used to develop nomograms of plasma clozapine concentration versus dose for male and female smokers and nonsmokers. Predicted plasma clozapine changes by +48% in nonsmokers, +17% in females, +/-8 % for every 0.1 change in MR (reference 1.32), +/-4% for every 5 years (reference 40 years), and +/-5 % for every 10 kg body weight (reference 80 kg). The nomograms can be used (i) to individualize dosage to achieve a given target plasma clozapine concentration, and (ii) for quantitative evaluation of adherence by estimating the likelihood of an observed concentration being achieved by a given dosage regimen. The model has been validated against published data.

Massive drug overdoses provide a unique opportunity to observe human pharmacokinetic data not otherwise ethically available. They can also provide practical examples for teaching thoughtful application of the principles of clinical pharmacology. Following a case of clozapine overdose in which onset of toxicity was delayed by 72 hours, a probable explanation was found in an exploration of three cases with unusual concentration-time profiles and revealed unexpected implications for the management of clozapine overdoses. The authors systematically addressed the possible mechanisms proposed in the literature for an unusual plateau in concentrations observed in three clozapine overdoses. The effects that the most commonly suggested explanations (i.e., delayed absorption and saturated or impaired metabolism) would have on both clozapine and norclozapine concentrations were then modeled using the data available from those three cases to provide an objective illustration for comparison. This exercise was then used as a teaching seminar, leading students through the steps required to reach a logical explanation for the observed delayed toxicity and to consider the implications for therapy. Delayed absorption best predicted the sustained serum clozapine and norclozapine concentrations observed in three cases, and modeling suggests that much of the drug remains in the gut, available for absorption for days following an overdose. As a seminar, the exercise provides students with a practical example of the value of systematically ruling out possible explanations by considering what effects various pharmacokinetic alterations would have on observed data. Absorption following massive clozapine overdose appears fundamentally different from that with conventional dosing. This suggests a potential for delayed or prolonged toxicity, extending well beyond the time frame predicted by its half-life, unless aggressive and sustained efforts are applied to remove clozapine from the gut. Data from drug overdoses provide opportunities to explore unusual aspects of pharmacokinetics, better understand future overdoses of the same agent, and present excellent material for teaching. A seminar illustrating the role that thoughtful application of pharmacologic principles had in addressing this case is now used to introduce the clinical aspects of pharmacology to students at our institutions.

Atypical antipsychotic agents such as aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine and ziprasidone offer many advantages over conventional neuroleptics. These agents reduce negative symptoms of schizophrenia, are effective in treatment refractory cases, and have a markedly lower incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. However, there is considerable patient-to-patient variability in therapeutic dose requirements of atypical antipsychotics and the propensity for side effects. Hence, the initial excitement since the introduction of atypical antipsychotics in late 1980s is now shifting towards a focus on individualization of pharmacotherapy and elucidation of the mechanistic basis of interindividual variability in drug response with use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers. Pharmacogenomics, introduced in late 1990s, is the study of variability in drug response using information from the entire genome of a given individual patient. Both pharmacogenomics and conventional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) share the similar goal of improving pharmacotherapy through better explanation of individual variability in drug response. Hence, pharmacogenomic biomarkers offer a unique opportunity to complement and expand the scope of traditional TDM in clinical psychopharmacology. Importantly, pharmacogenomics enables the investigation of factors distal to drug exposure in the plasma compartment (e.g. drug targets at the biophase), thereby providing a more complete portrayal of sources of variability in psychotropic drug response. We discuss (1). the definitions for biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in the context of pharmacogenomics, (2). genetic variations in isozyme-specific atypical antipsychotic metabolism in vivo, (3). selected examples of pharmacogenomic variability in pertinent drug targets and, (4). the anticipated roadmap from implementation of pharmacogenomics to changes in healthcare and therapeutic policy. In addition, a conceptual framework that outlines the theoretical advantages of pharmacogenomics-guided TDM is presented using recent clinical applications as precedence.

This report examines whether the gains associated with changing to clozapine are greater for people who have been intolerant of first generation antipsychotic medications versus those who have been treatment-nonresponsive to previous agents. We examined data from an open-label, randomized trial that compared clozapine to usual care with first generation agents (n = 227). While most patients (n = 173, 76%) entered that study because they were nonresponsive to at least two first generation antipsychotic medications (treatment nonresponsive [TNR]), 24 percent (n = 54) were eligible because they experienced intolerable side effects (treatment intolerant [TI]). Significantly more TI patients discontinued their clozapine trial during the 2-year study compared to TNR patients, and TI patients taking clozapine were more likely to develop agranulocytosis or severe leukopenia. However, TI patients who remained on clozapine showed significant reductions in problematic behaviors and greater movement toward independent living situations than TNR patients. Clinicians should give serious consideration to offering clozapine and other second generation antipsychotic medications to patients who have demonstrated intolerance to first generation antipsychotic medications.

Clozapine is an effective atypical antipsychotic drug applied in the treatment of resistant schizophrenia. The drug is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes especially the isozyme CYP1A2. Remarkably, the effective dosage varies widely among patients, making it necessary to individualize drug therapy with clozapine. The explanation for dosage variation may be differences in drug metabolism, and more specifically of CYP1A2 activity. This study is aimed at determining to what extent variability in clozapine dose can be explained by pharmacokinetic (PK) factors and more specifically by CYP1A2 activity in effectively treated psychiatric patients. In 22 evaluable patients with a schizophrenic disorder chronically using clozapine, the CYP1A2 activity and the clozapine clearance were estimated. For calculation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of clozapine, population PK software based upon Bayesian analysis was used. Caffeine clearance was estimated with the paraxanthine/caffeine ratio and served as estimate of CYP1A2 activity.A significant linear relationship was found between the clozapine dose and clozapine clearance (R: 0.71; P<0.05), whereas no relationship was found between clozapine dosage and clozapine serum trough concentration. Moreover, individual caffeine and clozapine clearances were found to be significantly related (R: 0.62; P<0.05) as were clozapine dose per kg body weight and P/C mol ratio (R: 0.44; P<0.05). We conclude that CYP1A2 activity is an important determinant of the variability of effective clozapine doses in psychiatric patients.

Clozapine alleviates the symptoms of a significant proportion of treatment-resistant schizophrenic patients. Previous studies suggest that the response to clozapine may be associated with prefrontal and temporal anatomy as well as with prefrontal, basal ganglia and thalamic metabolism. A sample of 25 treatment-resistant (TR) schizophrenic patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 18F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) before and after treatment with clozapine. We investigated the association between changes in positive, disorganized, and negative schizophrenic syndromes with clozapine treatment and a set of cerebral variables that included total intracranial volume (ICV); hippocampal, dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) and temporal gray-matter volume and metabolism; and metabolic activity of the thalamus, pallidum/putamen, and caudate head. Improvement in positive symptoms with clozapine was directly related to temporal gray-matter volume, whereas improvement of disorganization symptoms was inversely related to ICV and hippocampal volume. Patients with high baseline DLPF cortical volume and metabolic activity were more likely to experience improvement in their negative symptoms. We conclude that clinical improvement with clozapine may be related with the anatomy and metabolic activity of specific brain areas, with the structural integrity of the DLPF and temporal regions showing the maximum predictive capacity.

This study evaluated the disposition of the two atypical antipsychotics, amisulpride (AMS) and clozapine (CLZ), and its main metabolite N-desmethylclozapine (DCLZ), to their target structures in the central nervous system by applying an in vitro blood-brain barrier and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier based on monolayers of porcine brain microvessel endothelial cells (PMEC) or porcine choroid plexus epithelial cells (PCEC). Permeation studies through PMEC- and PCEC-monolayers were conducted for 60 min at drug concentrations of 1, 5, 10, and 30 muM applied to the donor compartment. PMEC were almost impermeable for AMS (permeation coefficient, P<1 x 10(-7) cm/s) in the resorptive direction, whereas transport in the secretory direction was observed with a P (+/-SD) of 5.2+/-3.6 x 10(-6) cm/s. The resorptive P of CLZ and DCLZ were 2.3+/-1.2 x 10(-4) and 9.6+/-5.0 x 10(-5) cm/s, respectively. For the permeation across PCEC in the resorptive direction, a P of 1.7+/-2.5 x 10(-6) cm/s was found for AMS and a P of 1.6+/-0.9 x 10(-4) and 2.3+/-1.3 x 10(-5) cm/s was calculated for CLZ and DCLZ, respectively. Both, CLZ and DCLZ, could easily pass both barriers with about a five-fold higher permeation rate of CLZ at the PCEC. The permeation of AMS across the BBB was restricted partly due to an efflux transport. It is thus suggested that AMS reaches its target structures via transport across the blood-CSF barrier.

The effect of mirtazapine on steady-state plasma concentrations of the newer atypical antipsychotics clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine was investigated in 24 patients with chronic schizophrenia. In order to treat residual negative symptoms, additional mirtazapine (30 mg per day) was administered for six consecutive weeks to nine patients stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-650 mg per day), eight on risperidone (3-8 mg per day) and seven on olanzapine (10-20mg per day). There were only minimal and statistically insignificant changes in mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and its metabolite norclozapine, risperidone and its metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone, and olanzapine during the study period. Mirtazapine co-administration with either clozapine, risperidone or olanzapine was well tolerated. In the overall sample, a slight improvement in negative symptomatology, as assessed by the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms, was observed at final evaluation (P<0.01) and six patients (two in each treatment group) were classified as responders. While double-blind, controlled studies are needed to evaluate the potential clinical benefits of mirtazapine in chronic schizophrenia, our findings indicate that mirtazapine has a negligible effect on the metabolism of clozapine, risperidone and olanzapine and can be added safely to an existing treatment with these antipsychotics.

Up to now, it is not yet clear whether and how clozapine and its metabolites are metabolized in neuronal cells. The interconversion of clozapine and its metabolites, clozapine-N-oxide and norclozapine, was studied in the hippocampal neuronal in vitro system of HT22 cells. Clinically relevant concentrations of clozapine (200+400 ng/ml) and its metabolites (100+200 ng/ml) were used for the examination of the metabolizing effects after short- (4 h) and long- (24 h) term incubation. Two-way analysis of variance revealed a significant decrease of clozapine (P<0.01) and norclozapine (P<0.01) levels in the supernatants of HT22 cells after the treatment procedures. Student-Newman-Keuls tests showed a significant decrease of clozapine 400 after 24 h of incubation (P=0.01) as well as of all concentrations of norclozapine. No significant treatment effects were found for the clozapine-N-oxide degradation. Using semi-quantification by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction methods, we could show a significant increase of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 mRNA levels (P<0.05) after clozapine treatment with 200 ng/ml. The results of the present study strongly suggest that clozapine and norclozapine are metabolized in hippocampal neuronal HT22 cells by CYP1A2, whereas the levels of clozapine-N-oxide were not affected. Moreover, CYP1A2 mRNA levels were significantly changed by incubation with clozapine 200.

Rationale: The cognitive impairments evident in many schizophrenics are related to the severity of their negative symptoms and ability to function in society. Drugs that alleviate cognitive impairments, in addition to other psychotic symptoms, may have an important influence on treatment outcome and the course of the illness., Objectives: A delayed non-match to sample task conducted in an eight-arm radial maze was used to determine the influence of four atypical antipsychotics (olanzapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, and clozapine), as well as a typical neuroleptic (haloperidol) on consolidation processes in healthy rats., Method: Well-trained rats were required to recall after a 7-h delay where they had received food pellets during an information phase (first four arm choices) in order to obtain the remaining food pellets during a retention phase (second four arm choices)., Results: The total number of errors that occurred during the retention session increased with increasing delay periods from 0 to 7 h. When administered orally immediately after the information phase, olanzapine (3 and 5 mg/kg) and risperidone (0.1 mg/kg) significantly reduced the number of errors made during the retention phase. Under the same conditions, clozapine, ziprasidone and haloperidol failed to affect the total number of retention phase errors., Conclusion: Some atypical antipsychotics, such as olanzapine and risperidone, improve consolidation processes and may alleviate the cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia.

Background: For the purposes of drug approval, the interchangeability of a generic drug and the corresponding brand-name drug is based on the criterion of "essential similarity," which requires that the generic drug have the same amount and type of active principle, the same route of administration, and the same therapeutic effectiveness as the original drug, as demonstrated by a bioequivalence study. However, bioequivalence and therapeutic effectiveness are not necessarily the same., Objective: This review summarizes available data comparing the bioequivalence and therapeutic efficacy of brand-name psychoactive drugs with those of the corresponding generic products., Methods: Relevant information was identified through searches of MEDLINE, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, and EMBASE for English-language articles and English abstracts of articles in other languages published between 1975 and the present. The search terms used were generic drug, branded drug, safety, toxicity, adverse events, clinical efficacy, bioequivalence, bioavailability, psychoactive drugs, and excipients., Results: Few publications compared the bioequivalence and efficacy of brand-name and generic psychoactive drugs. Those that were identified revealed differences in the efficacy and tolerability of brand-name and generic psychoactive drugs that had not been noted in the original bioequivalence studies. Specifically, l study found that plasma levels of phenytoin were 31% lower after a switch from a brand-name to a generic product. Several controlled studies of carbamazepine showed a recurrence of convulsions after the shift to a generic formulation. After a sudden recurrence of seizures when generic valproic acid was substituted for the brand-name product, an investigation by the US Food and Drug Administration found a difference in bioavailability between the 2 formulations. Statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic variables have been reported in favor of brand-name versus generic diazepam (P < 0.001). Finally, a case report involving paroxetine mesylate cast doubt on the tolerability and efficacy of the generic formulation., Conclusion: The essential-similarity requirement should be extended to include more rigorous analyses of tolerability and efficacy in actual patients as well as in healthy subjects.

Interpretation of the results of psychoactive or other drug measurements in post-mortem blood specimens may not be straightforward, in part because analyte concentrations in blood may change after death. There is also the issue of comparability of plasma (or serum) results to those obtained in whole blood. To investigate these problems with respect to clozapine, this drug (10mg/kg daily) was given orally to two pigs. Blood was collected 3h post-dose on day 7, the animals were sacrificed, and blood taken from central and peripheral veins for up to 48 h after death. Tissue samples were also collected immediately after death and at 48 h. Ante-mortem whole blood clozapine/N-desmethylclozapine (norclozapine) concentrations were 0.86/1.07 and 1.11/1.15 mg/l in pigs 1 and 2, respectively. Blood clozapine and norclozapine concentrations generally increased after death (central vein: clozapine up to 300%, norclozapine up to 460%; peripheral vein: clozapine up to 155%, norclozapine up to 185%). Initial blood and kidney clozapine and norclozapine concentrations were comparable in both animals, but were some two-fold higher in heart, liver and striated muscle in pig 2. In both animals, the heart and striated muscle clozapine and norclozapine concentrations had increased some two- to three-fold at 48 h, whilst the liver and kidney concentrations were essentially unchanged. The reason for the increase in heart and striated muscle concentrations at 48 h is unclear, but could be simple variation in sample site. The plasma:whole blood distribution of clozapine and norclozapine was studied in vitro. In human blood (one volunteer donor, haematocrit 0.50) the plots of plasma versus whole blood concentration were linear for both analytes across the range 0.1-1.5mg/l, although clozapine favoured plasma (plasma:whole blood ratio=1.12), whereas norclozapine favoured whole blood (ratio 0.68). In pig blood, the plots of plasma versus whole blood were non-linear in both cases, although clozapine favoured plasma to a greater extent than norclozapine. This may be due to lower plasma clozapine and norclozapine protein binding capacity in the pig as compared to man.

Objective: To report clinical findings resulting from a switch from branded to generic clozapine., Methods: Twenty patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were followed in this naturalistic outpatient study. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, and the Movement Disorder Assessment were used to assess differences in the clinical status of patients before and after switching from Clozaril to generic clozapine (Mylan Pharmaceuticals). Results were analyzed by means of the paired t-test and by calculation of the percent change in mean scores. A clinically significant change as measured by the PANSS was defined as a +/- 20% change in mean scores at final evaluation. The design was open-label and non-blinded., Results: At the final evaluation, the t-test revealed no significant differences between branded and generic clozapine for the total PANSS, the positive symptom, negative symptom, and the general psychopathology subscales of the PANSS, and the BAI. There were no clinically significant changes for any measure., Conclusions: In this small group of patients with schizophrenia, no deterioration in clinical status in several domains was noted after changing from branded to generic clozapine. This finding is consistent with pharmacologic data suggesting bioequivalence of the 2 products. Results, however, must be interpreted cautiously due to the lack of optimal study controls and small sample size.

Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is metabolized to a major extent by the cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP1A2. Smoking is a potent inducer of CYP1A2 enzyme activity, resulting in significant lower clozapine serum concentrations in smokers compared with non-smokers, upon a given dose. Recently, a single nucleotide polymorphism identified at position 734 of the CYP1A2 gene, was reported to affect the inducibility of the enzyme. Because this polymorphism in relation to smoking behaviour may be relevant in treatment with clozapine, we studied the effect of CYP1A2 genotype on clozapine clearance and dose requirement in a group of 80 smoking and non-smoking schizophrenic patients on long-term clozapine therapy. Clozapine serum concentration and CYP1A2 genotype had been determined routinely by high-performance liquid chromatography and polymerase chain reaction analyses, respectively. In smokers, the clozapine serum concentration corrected for dose (C/D ratio) was on average 2.5 times lower compared with non-smokers, indicating an enhanced clearance. The mean required maintenance doses of clozapine for smokers and non-smokers were 382 mg/day and 197 mg/day, respectively (P < 0.01). Neither among smokers, nor among non-smokers mean C/D ratios and daily doses did vary significantly between patients with the different CYP1A2 genotypes. The results show that clozapine clearance and daily dose requirement are strongly associated with smoking behaviour, while the CYP1A2 genetic polymorphism seems to have no significant clinical effect. Dosage adjustment based on smoking behaviour would be of value in order to lower the incidence of non-therapeutic serum drug levels and, consequently, intoxication or inadequate antipsychotic response., (Copyright 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins)