Search

Background: Tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination therapy are both considered first-line therapy in current hidradenitis suppurativa guidelines. However, evidence for their efficacy is drawn from small studies, often without validated outcomes., Objective: To assess the 12-week efficacy of oral tetracyclines and a combination of clindamycin and rifampicin., Methods: A prospective, international cohort study performed between October 2018 and August 2019., Results: In total, 63.6% of the included 283 patients received oral tetracyclines, and 36.4% were treated with clindamycin and rifampicin. Both groups showed a significant decrease in International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System from baseline (both P < .001). The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) was achieved in 40.1% and 48.2% of patients, respectively (P = .26). Patient characteristics or disease severity were not associated with the attainment of HiSCR or the minimal clinically important differences for the Dermatology Life Quality Index and pain., Limitations: Cohort study. Respectively, 23.9% and 19.4% of patients had to be excluded from the HiSCR analysis for the tetracycline and combination therapy group because of a low abscess and nodule count at baseline., Conclusion: This study shows significant efficacy of both tetracycline treatment and clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy after 12 weeks in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. No significant differences in efficacy were observed between the 2 treatments, regardless of disease severity., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Tzellos has reported relationships with AbbVie, UCB, and Sanofi Genzyme. Dr Guillem has received honoraria from AbbVie and Novartis as a consultant and has given nonpaid lectures for AbbVie, Brothier, Cicaplus, Coloplast, Inresa, and Novartis. Dr Giamarellos-Bourboulis has received honoraria from Abbott CH, Angelini Italy, bioMérieux Inc, InflaRx GmbH, MSD Greece, and XBiotech Inc; independent educational grants from AbbVie, Abbott, Astellas Pharma Europe, AxisShield, bioMérieux Inc, InflaRx GmbH, ThermoFisher Brahms GmbH, and XBiotech Inc; and funding from the FrameWork 7 program HemoSpec (granted to the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), the Horizon2020 Marie-Curie Project European Sepsis Academy (granted to the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens), and the Horizon 2020 European Grant ImmunoSep (granted to the Hellenic Institute for the Study of Sepsis). Dr Jemec has received honoraria from AbbVie, Chemocentryx, Coloplast, Incyte, Inflarx, Kymera, Leo Pharma, Novartis, and UCB for participation on advisory boards; grants from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Inflarx, Janssen-Cilag, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi for participation as an investigator; speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Galderma, and Novartis; and unrestricted departmental grants from Leo Pharma and Novartis. Dr Katoulis has reported relationships with AbbVie, Novartis, Genesis Pharma, Mylan, Janssen, Leo Pharma, and Lilly. Dr Koenig was an investigator, speaker, or advisor for AbbVie, Braun-Stiftung, and Celgene. Dr Lazaridou has received speaker honoraria, and/or honoraria for participation in advisory boards, and/or grants from AbbVie, Novartis, Genesis Pharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Roche, Lilly, UCB, and Sanofi. Dr Matusiak reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, InflaRx, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Menlo, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Trevi, and UCB. Dr Pinter has been an investigator, speaker, or advisor for AbbVie, Almirall-Hermal, Amgen, Biogen Idec, Biontec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Hexal, Janssen, LEO-Pharma, MC2, Medac, Merck Serono, Mitsubishi, MSD, Novartis, Pascoe, Pfizer, Tigercat Pharma, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Sanofi-Genzyme, Schering-Plough, and UCB Pharma. Dr Romani has reported relationships with AbbVie, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Janssen, Almirall, and Isdín. Dr Saunte was paid as a consultant for advisory board meeting by AbbVie, Janssen, Sanofi, and Leo Pharma and received speaker honoraria and/or grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, Galderma, Novartis, and Leo Pharma during the last 5 years. Dr Szepietowski reports personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, InflaRx, Janssen-Cilag, LEO, Menlo, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, Sienna, Trevi, and UCB. Dr Trigoni has reported relationships with AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, and LEO. Dr Trigoni has reported relationships with AbbVie, UCB, Novartis, and LEO. Dr van der Zee has received honoraria from AbbVie. Drs van Straalen, Benhadou, Cuencia-Barrales, Daxhelet, Daoud, Efthymiou, Marzano, Molina-Leyva, Moltrasio, Potenza, Skroza, Stergianou, and Vilarrasa have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the alpha subunit of IL-4 was recently approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adult patients., Objective: To assess dupilumab effectiveness and safety in adults with moderate-to-severe AD in a real-life Italian multicentre retrospective cohort., Methods: Adult moderate-to-severe AD patients, referring to 39 Italian centers, received dupilumab in the context of a national patient access program. Disease assessment was performed at baseline, after 4 and 16 weeks of treatment using Eczema-Area-and-Severity-Index (EASI) score, itch and sleep numerical-rating-score (itch-NRS, sleep-NRS) and Dermatology-Life-Quality-Index (DLQI)., Results: A total of 109 (71 M/38F) patients was studied. There was a significant reduction in EASI score, itch-NRS, sleep-NRS and DLQI from baseline to week 4 and a further significant decline to week 16. EASI 50, EASI75 and EASI90 were achieved by 59.6%, 28.4% and 9.3% of patients at 4 weeks and by 87.2%, 60.6% and 32.4% of them at 16 weeks, respectively. Adverse events were experienced by 19.2% (21/109) of the patients and they were all mild in intensity, being conjunctivitis the most common side effect., Conclusions: Dupilumab significantly improved disease severity, pruritus, sleep loss and quality of life with an acceptable safety profile.

Since all clinical trials conducted during the development of anti-COVID-19 vaccines have adopted among the exclusion criteria the presence of immunodepression or immunomodulating therapy, to date, the effects of vaccination against the new coronavirus 2 in people under such conditions have yet to be clearly defined. The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety of treatment with biotechnological drugs in patients suffering from moderate-severe psoriasis and subjected to the prophylactic vaccination against SARS-Cov-2. Additionally, the secondary objective of the research is to investigate the existence of a possible impact of anti-COVID-19 vaccination on the natural chronic-relapsing course and the severity of the psoriatic disease. The study included 436 patients with moderate-severe psoriasis, both male and female, in treatment with biologics. The data were collected using the direct interview method. A reduction of 74.13% of average Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI )compared to baseline (T0) was found in all subjects; this does not differ significantly from the group that underwent vaccination (73.4%). Moreover; at the end of the study, neither mild nor severe adverse events (ADR) were observed among them. In conclusion, biotechnological drugs used in the management of patients with moderate-severe psoriasis demonstrate a high safety profile also in subjects immunized against SARS-Cov-2.

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a primary neoplasm of the eye arising from the melanocytes residing in the iris, ciliary body or choroid. It is the most frequent intraocular malignancy and often determines metastases at distant sites, with a peculiar tropism for the liver. Metastatic UM has a poor prognosis, as any treatment affects the natural course of this fatal disease. Herein, we report a case of a UM metastatic to the liver in a 54 year-old female patient, initially treated with nivolumab without success. The patient was then scheduled for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) while continuing immunotherapy. This combination led to a complete and durable response and the patient is currently free of disease, two years after the diagnosis of the hepatic metastases. The association between SIRT and immunotherapy (IT) has very promising perspectives for metastatic UM, especially considering the disappointing or contradictory results of classic chemotherapies, IT alone and targeted therapies. Furthermore, this combination has been shown to have a good security profile. However, further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of associating SIRT and IT and to clarify some unsolved problems, such as the timing of administration of these two therapies.

Background: Erythroplasia of Queyrat (EQ) is a rare squamous cell carcinoma in situ, usually occurring on the glans penis, the prepuce, or the urethral meatus. Therapy is mandatory because it can progress to invasive carcinoma in up to 30% of cases. Treatment options include 5-fluorouracil, curettage, cryotherapy, radiotherapy, laser, partial or total penectomy, and microsurgery, as also with imiquimod and photodynamic therapies., Methods: Between 2015 to 2018 we treated five patients, with histologically confirmed EQ, with ingenol mebutate (IM) 0.015% gel applied for 3 days consecutively., Results: Three patients showed complete response at one year follow up. Two patients showed partial response after two months, so they received a second course of therapy with IM. At one-year follow-up, one of them showed complete response, the other partial response., Conclusions: Our experience demonstrated that IM may be considered as an effective and safe treatment option in EQ. IM offers various advantages such as easy and fast application, rapid complete remission, better compliance, few side effects and excellent cosmetical results. The authors call for further exploitation in bigger trials.

Background: Few and small studies have described the management of immunomodulant/immunosuppressive therapies or phototherapy in atopic dermatitis (AD) patients during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic., Methods: A national registry, named DA-COVID-19 and involving 35 Italian dermatology units, was established in order to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of adult AD patients treated with systemic immunomodulant/immunosuppressive medications or phototherapy. Demographic and clinical data were obtained at different timepoints by teledermatology during COVID-19 pandemic, when regular visits were not allowed due to sanitary restrictions. Disease severity was assessed by both physician- and patient-reported assessment scores evaluating itch intensity, sleep disturbances, and AD severity., Results: A total of 1831 patients were included, with 1580/1831 (86.3%) continuing therapy during pandemic. Most patients were treated with dupilumab (86.1%, 1576/1831) that was interrupted in only 9.9% (156/1576) of cases, while systemic immunosuppressive compounds were more frequently withdrawn. Treatment interruption was due to decision of the patient, general practitioner, or dermatologist in 39.9% (114/286), 5.6% (16/286), and 30.1% (86/286) of cases, respectively. Fear of increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection (24.8%, 71/286) was one of the main causes of interruption. Sixteen patients (0.9%) resulted positive to SARS-CoV-2 infection; 3 of them (0.2%) were hospitalized but no cases of COVID-related death occurred., Conclusions: Most AD patients continued systemic treatments during COVID pandemic and lockdown period, without high impact on disease control, particularly dupilumab-treated patients., (© 2021 EAACI and John Wiley and Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd.)

Background: COVID-19 is associated with a wide range of skin manifestations., Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics of COVID-19-associated skin manifestations and explore the relationships among the 6 main cutaneous phenotypes and systemic findings., Methods: Twenty-one Italian Dermatology Units were asked to collect the demographic, clinical, and histopathologic data of 200 patients with COVID-19-associated skin manifestations. The severity of COVID-19 was classified as asymptomatic, mild, moderate, or severe., Results: A chilblain-like acral pattern was significantly associated with a younger age (P < .0001) and, after adjusting for age, significantly associated with less severe COVID-19 (P = .0009). However, the median duration of chilblain-like lesions was significantly longer than that of the other cutaneous manifestations taken together (P < .0001). Patients with moderate/severe COVID-19 were more represented than those with asymptomatic/mild COVID-19 among the patients with cutaneous manifestations other than chilblain-like lesions, but only the confluent erythematous/maculo-papular/morbilliform phenotype was significantly associated with more severe COVID-19 (P = .015), and this significance disappeared after adjustment for age., Limitations: Laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 was not possible in all cases., Conclusions: After adjustment for age, there was no clear-cut spectrum of COVID-19 severity in patients with COVID-19-related skin manifestations, although chilblain-like acral lesions were more frequent in younger patients with asymptomatic/pauci-symptomatic COVID-19., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND: Acne is a chronic multifactorial skin disease with a high prevalence among adolescents. The therapeutic approach for mild to moderate papulopustular acne includes the use of systemic tetracycline. Increased risk of antibiotic resistance necessitates research into alternative therapeutic approaches, such as zinc sulphate. Efficacy of zinc sulphate in acne treatment is widely reported in the literature, but drug comparison studies are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of zinc sulphate to lymecycline for the treatment of mild to moderate papulopustular acne. METHODS: One hundred patients were equally randomized to receive either zinc sulphate or lymecycline. Acne severity was evaluated using the subjective Global Acne Grading System (GAGS) and the Acne-specific Quality of Life (AQoL) questionnaire at baseline and after four and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Both zinc sulphate and lymecycline induced a statistically significant reduction in GAGS scores at four and 12 weeks of treatment. The improvements in AQoL scores in patients treated with zinc sulphate were significantly higher than those in the lymecycline group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that zinc sulphate is a valid alternative therapeutic approach in the treatment of mild to moderate papulopustular acne relative to lymecycline in terms of clinical efficacy, tolerability, and the occurrence of side effects., Competing Interests: FUNDING:No funding was provided for this article. DISCLOSURES:The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this article., (Copyright © 2021. Matrix Medical Communications. All rights reserved.)

Background: Treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in the elderly may be challenging, due to side-effects of traditional anti-inflammatory drugs and to comorbidities often found in this age group. Furthermore, efficacy and safety of innovative drugs such as dupilumab are not yet well known., Objectives: A multicentre retrospective, observational, real-life study on the efficacy and safety of dupilumab was conducted in a group of patients aged ≥65 years and affected by severe AD. Their main clinical features were also examined., Methods: Data of elderly patients with severe (EASI ≥24) AD treated with dupilumab at label dosage for 16 weeks were retrospectively collected. Treatment outcome was assessed by comparing objective (EASI) and subjective (P-NRS, S-NRS and DLQI) scores at baseline and after 16 weeks of treatment., Results: Two hundred and seventy-six patients were enrolled in the study. They represented 11.37% of all patients with severe AD. Flexural eczema was the most frequent clinical phenotype, followed by prurigo nodularis. The coexistence of more than one phenotype was found in 63/276 (22.82%) subjects. Data on the 16-week treatment with dupilumab were available for 253 (91.67%) patients. Efficacy of dupilumab was demonstrated by a significant reduction of all the scores. No statistically significant difference regarding efficacy was found in elderly patients when compared to the group of our AD patients aged 18-64 years, treated with dupilumab over the same period. Furthermore, only 18 (6.52%) patients discontinued the drug due to inefficacy. Sixty-one (22.51%) patients reported adverse events, conjunctivitis and flushing being the most frequent. One (0.36%) patient only discontinued dupilumab due to an adverse event., Conclusions: Therapy with dupilumab led to a significant improvement of AD over a 16-week treatment period, with a good safety profile. Therefore, dupilumab could be considered as an efficacious and safe treatment for AD also in the elderly., (© 2020 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

This study evaluated whether secukinumab treatment for patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis correlates with improvements in symptoms of anxiety and depression. SUPREME was a 24-week, phase IIIb, multicentre, prospective study conducted across 50 centres in Italy with an extension period of up to 72 weeks. Assessments used were: Psoriasis Area Sever-ity Index (PASI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety (HADS-A), and HADS - Depression (HADS-D) scores and Dermatology Quality Life Index (DLQI). Compared with baseline, a significantly greater proportion of patients who reported moderate to severe clinical symptoms of anxiety or depression (HADS-A or HADS-D ≥ 11) were free of moderate to severe symptoms at weeks 16 and 48. The PASI and DLQI scores reduced over time with secukinumab treatment. Psoriasis treatment with secukinumab for 48 weeks resulted in significantly improved skin clearance and a parallel improvement in symptoms of anxiety and depression, assessed by HADS.

Introduction: Treat-to-target strategies are used in several chronic diseases to improve outcomes. Treatment goals have also been suggested for psoriasis, but there is currently no consensus on targets, and guidance is needed to implement this strategy in clinical practice. The project 'Treat to Target Italia' was launched by a scientific board (SB) of 10 psoriasis experts to generate expert consensus recommendations., Methods: On the basis of the published literature, their clinical experience, and the results of a survey among Italian dermatologists, the SB identified four relevant topics: (1) clinical remission; (2) quality of life; (3) abrogation of systemic inflammation; (4) safety. They drafted 20 statements addressing these four topics and submitted them to a panel of 28 dermatologists, in a Delphi process, to achieve consensus (greater than 80% agreement)., Results: Consensus was reached on all statements. Treatment goals defining clinical remission should include a 90% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI90 response) or an absolute PASI score of less than or equal to 3. Patient's quality of life and satisfaction are important targets. If PASI targets are achieved, there should be no or very low impact of psoriasis on quality of life [Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score less than or equal to 3]. If PASI or DLQI goals are not achieved within 3-4 months, treatment should be changed. Abrogation of systemic inflammation may be crucial for preventing or delaying inflammatory comorbidities. Safety is an equally important target as efficacy., Conclusion: These 20 consensus statements define the parameters of a treat-to-target strategy for psoriasis in Italy. It is hoped that use of these in the management of patients with psoriasis will improve treatment outcomes and patient health-related quality of life.

Guselkumab, a subcutaneously administered fully human IgG1λ monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the p19 subunit of interleukin 23, is approved in both the USA and the EU for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The efficacy and safety of guselkumab were demonstrated in four randomized, double-blind, Phase III trials (VOYAGE 1 and 2, NAVIGATE, and ECLIPSE), which demonstrated high levels of clinical response over three years of continuous treatment, regardless of sex, age, body weight, and race, maintaining a favourable safety profile and long-term tolerability. Guselkumab was shown to be efficacious in patients with prior failure of other biologics, including adalimumab and ustekinumab, and was superior to both adalimumab and secukinumab in head-to-head trials. Guselkumab efficacy was also observed in the treatment of psoriasis localized in difficult-to-treat body regions including the scalp, palms and/or soles, and fingernails. Treatment with guselkumab improved health-related quality of life and patient-reported signs and symptoms. Guselkumab has a consistently favourable safety profile and is well tolerated over the long-term. Clinical development of guselkumab as a treatment is ongoing for other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis. In the overall management of patients with plaque psoriasis, guselkumab is a robust treatment option with durable maintenance of response over time.

Background : The susceptibility of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and the risks or benefits related to the use of biological therapies for COVID-19 are unknown. Few data about prevalence, clinical course and outcomes of COVID-19 among psoriatic patients were reported. The aims of this study were 1) to assess the prevalence and severity of COVID-19 in psoriatic patients treated with biologic agents during the first phase of the emergency (22 February to 22 April 2020) in Italy, and 2) to report the clinical outcomes of patients who have been exposed to individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods : Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis, aged ≥18 years and undergoing treatment with biologic agents as of 22 February 2020, were eligible to be included in PSO-BIO-COVID study. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients using any biologic for psoriasis treatment between 22 February and 22 April 2020 were registered. Results : A total of 12,807 psoriatic patients were included in the PSO-BIO-COVID study. In this cohort 26 patients (0.2%) had a swab confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eleven patients required hospitalization and two died. Conclusion : The incidence of COVID-19 observed in our cohort of psoriatic patients (0.2%) is similar to that seen in the general population (0.31%) in Italy. However, the course of the disease was mild in most patients. Biological therapies may likely lessen 'cytokine storm' of COVID-19, which sometimes lead to multiple organ failure, ARDS, and death.

Objective: To assess the role of CD3 + CD20 + CD4 - CD8 - double-negative (DN) or CD3 + CD20 + CD4/CD8 + T cells and the related pro-inflammatory cytokines in the humor aqueous, in mediating retinal microvascular changes in patients with chronic plaque-type moderate to severe psoriasis., Design: A total of 76 patients (57.6 ± 11.7 years) with chronic plaque-type psoriasis were initially evaluated. Nineteen patients (19 eyes) and 19 healthy volunteers (19 eyes) were subjected to dermatological evaluation with Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) and the Dermatology life quality index (DLQI). Retinal images were processed using an automatized software. On the same day, a venous sample was collected and analyzed using multiparametric flow cytometry. Three out of 6 patients who presented cataract, consented to perform surgery with humor aqueous collection. The samples were analyzed using a Multi-Analyte ELISA kit for the simultaneous quantification of IL1α, IL1β, IL2, IL4, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL12, IL17A, IFNγ, TNF-α, GMCSF., Results: The CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + CD20 + CD56 - T cells expression was greater in the psoriatic patients (+73.9%, P < 0.001) compared to controls, but not the DN T cells (-8.2%, P = 0.30). Ocular complications were diagnosed in 61.1% of patients, microvascular parameters including artero-venous ratio (P = 0.04), subfoveal choriocapillaris/Sattler's layer, and choroidal thickness (CT, both P < 0.001) were significantly altered in psoriasis subgroup. The increased circulating levels of the CD3 + CD4 + /CD8 + CD20 + CD56 - T cells were associated with thinning of subfoveal CT (P = 0.03) and Haller's layer (P = 0.01). Instead, the DN T cells presented an inverse relationship with disease duration (P = 0.02), DLQI score (P = 0.02), and the use of biological therapy (P = 0.05). The related cytokine patterns possibly modified in this cellular context have been investigated. No significant differences were observed in cytokines levels between psoriasis and controls, the most significant difference was detected on IL-6, without reaching statistical significance (fold change of 1.4, P = 0.13)., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that CD20 + T cell subpopulation is highly represented in psoriasis regardless of the use of immunomodulatory therapies, and the diffuse microvascular alterations suggested possible endothelial damage as mainstream for the genesis of psoriatic-mediated complications as further supported by the comparable concentrations of cytokines, at least as humor aqueous content, with respect to healthy eyes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : Only 20-40% of patients respond to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, the early identification of subjects that can benefit from such therapeutic regimen is mandatory. Areas covered : The immunobiological mechanisms of ICIs are briefly illustrated. Furthermore, the limitations of traditional radiological approaches are covered. Then, the pros and cons of molecular imaging through positron emission computed tomography (PET/CT) are reviewed, with a particular focus on 18 f-fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) and PET-derived metabolic parameters. Lastly, translational perspective of radiopharmaceuticals others than 18 F-FDG such as 89 zirconium ( 89 Zr) or fluorine-18 ( 18 F) labeled monoclonal antibodies (e.g. 89 Zr-atezolizumab, 89 Zr-nivolumab) binding to specific biomarkers are discussed. Expert opinion : Molecular imaging presents a prominent role for the management of oncological patients treated with ICIs. Preliminary clinical data indicate that PET/CT with 18 F-FDG is useful for assessing the response to treatment and for the imaging of immune-related adverse effects. Nevertheless, the methodological approach (iPERCIST, PERCIMT, or others) to be used for an optimal diagnostic accuracy and patients' evaluation is still a debated issue. PET/CT with radioligands directed toward ICIs biomarkers, although is still in a translational phase, holds the promise of accurately predicting the response to treatment and revealing the acquired resistance to immunotherapy.

Background: Certolizumab, a pegylated tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor, reduced disease activity in randomized trials of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Real-life data are missing., Objective: To confirm the effectiveness and safety of certolizumab in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis in routine clinical practice., Methods: In this retrospective study involving 11 Italian sites, patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis received subcutaneous certolizumab (400 mg loading dose at 0, 2 and 4 weeks, followed by 200 mg every 2 weeks) for up to 52 weeks. Primary outcomes included mean change from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) scores, and the proportion of patients achieving a 75%, 90% or 100% reduction in PASI score. Other endpoints included Disease Activity Score computed on 44 joints correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate during the first hour (DAS44-ESR), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) score], inflammatory markers and quality of life (QOL)., Results: In the study were enrolled 153 patients (mean age: 55 years). Certolizumab reduced the mean PASI score from baseline by 4.45, 6.30 and 7.58 at weeks 12, 24 and 52, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). At weeks 24 and 52, 69.6% and 83.3% of patients had a PASI score ≤3. DAS44-ESR, TJC, SJC and mNAPSI scores, and pain VAS were also all significantly improved from baseline at each time point. C-reactive protein levels decreased during treatment, being significant at week 24. On multivariate analysis, psoriasis duration, baseline PASI, mNAPSI and pain VAS scores were found to be predictive of the improvement in PASI score at week 12., Conclusion: Certolizumab displayed also in the real-life encouraging results in both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis patients., (© 2020 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background and Aims: Literature highlights the role of risk factors like age, body mass index (BMI), tobacco smoking, alcohol intake and diet in the pathogenesis of several cancer types but little is known for non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). The aim of this epidemiological study was to evaluate the correlation between modifiable risk factors (BMI, metabolic panel, diet, lifestyle, medical history) and not modifiable risk factors (gender, age) and NMSC development., Methods: From February 2018 to September 2019, 162 patients affected by NMSC were compared to a group of 167 controls. A univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to elaborate the data collected through face-to-face interviews., Results: While our evidence did not always reach statistical significance, NMSC study group patients exhibited high rates of analyzed risk factors (male gender aging over 55 years, high BMI, reduced physical activity) compared to the control group., Conclusions: Our study indicates that practicing more than 30 min of physical activity daily could be a protective factor against the NMSC onset. Other risk factors were not correlated with NMSC, but more evidence is needed to establish a possible link.

Acne is a chronic inflammatory relapsing disease that affect predominantly adolescents, with scarring as a frequent sequele. Early and appropriate therapy allows better management of the disease, longer remission, scars risk reduction, and improvement of quality of life. According to therapeutic algorithm, systemic isotretinoin can be used in severe acne and also in moderate forms resistant to other systemic treatments. The aims of this real-life observational study were to determine and compare the effectiveness of isotretinoin evaluated by Global Acne Grading System and Acne Quality of Life in moderate and in severe acne, correlation between efficacy and cumulative dose of isotretinoin, tolerability, and recurrence rate. Moreover, the differences in efficacy and tolerability between male and female patients were compared. The treatment with systemic isotretinoin led to an improvement in acne severity and quality of life in all observed subjects., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

This systematic review investigated the literature on acquired v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma. We searched MEDLINE for articles on BRAF inhibitor resistance in patients with melanoma published since January 2010 in the following areas: (1) genetic basis of resistance; (2) epigenetic and transcriptomic mechanisms; (3) influence of the immune system on resistance development; and (4) combination therapy to overcome resistance. Common resistance mutations in melanoma are BRAF splice variants, BRAF amplification, neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1/2 (MEK1/2) mutations. Genetic and epigenetic changes reactivate previously blocked mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, activate alternative signaling pathways, and cause epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Once BRAF inhibitor resistance develops, the tumor microenvironment reverts to a low immunogenic state secondary to the induction of programmed cell death ligand-1. Combining a BRAF inhibitor with a MEK inhibitor delays resistance development and increases duration of response. Multiple other combinations based on known mechanisms of resistance are being investigated. BRAF inhibitor-resistant cells develop a range of 'escape routes', so multiple different treatment targets will probably be required to overcome resistance. In the future, it may be possible to personalize combination therapy towards the specific resistance pathway in individual patients.

Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common skin disease related to ultraviolet chronic exposure, that is now considered a squamous cell carcinoma in situ. Primary skin cancer prevention strategies should be recommended for high risk patients. There is a wide spectrum of treatment options available for AKs, and several variables should be taken into account regarding the best therapeutic choice for each patient. The purpose of this article is to review the current treatment strategies for AKs localized on the face and scalp, with a focus on the practical point of view that could be useful for choosing the best therapeutic option. The two main therapeutic approaches will be distinguished first: lesion-directed and field-directed. Afterwards, the treatment based on clinical type and patient comorbidity will be discussed.

Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating disease with a considerable effect on patient quality of life. Its clinical severity can be measured using different scoring systems; however, few of them include patient-centred parameters., Objective: To create a new scoring system for HS that includes a quality-of-life instrument, the HIDRAdisk., Methods: This post hoc analysis was carried out within the framework of a multicentre, longitudinal, epidemiologic study conducted over 9 months on quality-of-life aspects of HS. The new severity score was created using as reference a question from the Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ) concerning the severity of HS as evaluated by the patient. Associated variables were selected using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. The discriminant capabilities of the final model and of the final score were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test., Results: The study population included 308 patients with HS of any severity grade. According to the results of the regression models, the variables associated with the reference SSQ measure were number of inflammatory nodules, abscesses and draining fistulas; the HIDRAdisk score; and the number of subumbilical lesions. The HIDRAscore is obtained by the sum of the scores associated with the number of these parameters. Possible scores range from 0 to 10., Conclusion: The HIDRAscore is a new scoring system for HS severity which, in addition to the clinical evaluation by the physician, includes a validated patient-reported outcome measure, the HIDRAdisk., (© 2020 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Calciphylaxis is a rare disease characterized by ectopic calcification of skin arterioles resulting in ischemia, thrombosis and necrosis. Since end stage renal disease patients are those mainly affected, the term calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is also suggested. Early clinical manifestations are subtle, while overt necrotic ulcers may quickly spread and become infected so as to result in ominous outcome. Diagnosis might not be easy due to the number of other ischemic and non-ischemic skin lesions observed in uraemia. Skin biopsy, has been proposed as the diagnostic test and is often considered, but not systematically performed due to the hypothetical risk of further spreading of the lesions. Such ambiguity could be responsible for misdiagnosis or underdiagnosis. We review here five consecutive cases recorded in our Unit, all submitted to skin biopsy but with inconsistent results which generated some clinical frustration. Thus, we decided to carefully re-evaluate all of them together with pathologists and dermatologists. However, even after this ex-post discussion, we could not reach a complete agreement on the final diagnosis. In the meanwhile, papers were published in the literature that started to shed some light on the role of skin biopsy in the diagnosis of CUA.

The BRAF inhibitors vemurafenib, dabrafenib and encorafenib are used in the treatment of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma. They selectively target BRAF kinase and thus interfere with the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling pathway that regulates the proliferation and survival of melanoma cells. In addition to their molecularly targeted activity, BRAF inhibitors have immunomodulatory effects. The MAPK pathway is involved in T-cell receptor signalling, and interference in the pathway by BRAF inhibitors has beneficial effects on the tumour microenvironment and anti-tumour immune response in BRAF-mutant melanoma, including increased immune-stimulatory cytokine levels, decreased immunosuppressive cytokine levels, enhanced melanoma differentiation antigen expression and presentation of tumour antigens by HLA 1, and increased intra-tumoral T-cell infiltration and activity. These effects promote recognition of the tumour by the immune system and enhance anti-tumour T-cell responses. Combining BRAF inhibitors with MEK inhibitors provides more complete blockade of the MAPK pathway. The immunomodulatory effects of BRAF inhibition alone or in combination with MEK inhibition provide a rationale for combining these targeted therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Available data support the synergy between these treatment approaches, indicating such combinations provide an additional beneficial effect on the tumour microenvironment and immune response in BRAF-mutant melanoma.

Background: Psoriasis is a multifactorial chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by erythemato-squamous lesions with a chronic relapsing course. The desease clinical activity (PASI) and the patient's quality of life (DLQI) are the main elements to assess for setting up a correct therapeutic management., Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the management of the patient with moderate-severe psoriasis in therapy with biological drugs and to establish the difference in the achievement of PASI 90 and DLQI 0-1 between a group of patients treated with only biological drugs and a group of patients receiving biologic therapy in combination with a topical ointment., Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational real-life study enrolling 60 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis and divided in two groups: Group A patients treated with biological drugs, Group B patiens treated with biological drugs in association with an ointment composed of betamethasone, salicylic acid and ammonium sulpho-ichtyolate, applied 2 times a day. PASI and DLQI were evaluated at study beginning (T0) for both study groups, after 12 weeks (T3) for sample in therapy with biological drugs and after 24 weeks (T6) for sample in co-medication therapy., Results: The two-way ANOVA method was used to evaluate the standard deviations (SD): at T3 and T6 Group B obtained a significant PASI reduction and improvement of DLQI (* p value <0.05) compared to Group A., Conclusions: Our study shown that the patients treated with biologics in co-medication with topical therapy reached a significantly higher PASI and DQLI compared with those treated with only biologics. Furthermore we observed that the association with topical oinment showed more efficacy in the treatment of areas such as palm-plantar region, that is often difficult-to-treat region, even for biologic drugs.

An early identification of non-responders in oncology is of crucial importance to rapidly switch treatment regimens. Here we report a positron emission tomography, (PET)-guided switch from immunotherapy to targeted therapy in a patient affected by metastatic melanoma. We describe the case of a 78-years-old male patient diagnosed with nodular melanoma, submitted to baseline PET/CT with 18fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) that showed cutaneous and skeletal metastases (stage IV). The patients started immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. A PET/CT performed 3 months after the start of immunotherapy demonstrated progressive metabolic disease both at skeletal and cutaneous level, confirmed also by the biopsy. As patients resulted positive for BRAF V600k mutation, treatment regimen was rapidly switched to combined anti-BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. The PET/CT performed 3 months later, showed almost complete metabolic response. Ten months after the beginning of targeted therapy, the patient continues to present a durable metabolic response. PET/CT with 18F-FDG may help in monitoring the response to treatment in metastatic melanoma thus defining personalized therapeutic pathways.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with elevated prevalence of comorbidities, especially metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. We used a tool called Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in order to assess the correlation between HS and alterations of the sympathetic-vagal equilibrium in the autonomic cardiovascular regulation system. We found increased sympathetic activity, associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. HS, according to our results, is an independent cardiovascular risk factor., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright © 2020 Nevena Skroza et al.)

Background: Ixekizumab (anti-IL-17A) is a biological agent used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Real-life data on the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab are currently scarce., Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ixekizumab in a cohort of psoriatic and psoriatic arthritis patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 201 patients affected by moderate-to-severe psoriasis and treated with ixekizumab at seven Italian University centers. Data analysis focused on 110 patients who started ixekizumab at baseline and completed at least 24 weeks of treatment., Results: Significant reduction of mean (± standard deviation) baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score (14.3 ± 5.8) was detected at 4 weeks of ixekizumab therapy (4.9 ± 4.2, p < 0.001), with a further significant improvement at weeks 12 and 24 (1.9 ± 2.9 and 0.9 ± 1.6, respectively) (p < 0.001). Our analysis showed 90%, 72%, and 57% of patients achieving PASI 75, 90, and 100 responses (75%, 90%, and 100% reduction in PASI score), respectively, after 24 weeks' therapy. For patients with arthritis (28%), a significant reduction in the mean (± standard deviation) baseline Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28 score (4.6 ± 5.1) was detected at week 4 (2.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.01), with a further significant improvement at weeks 12 and 24 (2.1 ± 1.2 and 1.4 ± 0.9, respectively) (p < 0.001). The bio-naïve group showed significantly higher PASI 90 and 100 response rates at week 12 than the bio-exposed one (p < 0.05). This trend in terms of PASI 100 response was also maintained at week 24 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, PASI 90 responses were significantly higher in anti-interleukin (IL)-17A-naïve patients at week 24 than in anti-IL-17A-experienced ones (p < 0.05). The dropout rate for adverse events (AEs) was as low as 2% (2/110), while AEs that did not cause treatment interruption were observed in 6% (7/110). Patients withdrawing from the study were defined as non-responders according to the non-responder imputation method. The retrospective design of the study does not allow missing data to be retrieved or homogeneous patient selection., Conclusions: The present study illustrates ixekizumab in real-world clinical practice, confirming its usefulness and safety in the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

Background : Real-life data often highlight the side effects of certain drugs not previously reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objective: To describe cutaneous inflammatory eruptions in psoriatic patients treated with an anti IL-17A agent (secukinumab or ixekizumab). Methods : Retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who started an anti IL-17A agent between September 2016-February 2019 and who developed cutaneous inflammatory eruptions during treatment. A systematic review of similar events reported in the literature was performed. Results : Data of 468 patients were reviewed and 27 cutaneous inflammatory eruptions of 27 (5.8%) patients were collected. The eruptions appeared after a mean of 16.9 ± 17.0 weeks of therapy showing a classical acute eczema in 11 patients (40.7%), an atopic dermatitis-like rash in 11 patients (40.7%) and a psoriasiform eruption in 5 patients (18.5%). Histopathology of 12/27 cases showed epidermal spongiosis in all these variants. Conclusion : We described the clinic-pathologic features of some eczematous eruptions occurring in psoriatic patients, 3-4 months after treatment initiation with an anti IL-17A agent. Further investigations are needed to explain this phenomenon, that might be defined a paradoxical adverse event, based upon the role of IL17 in eczema pathogenesis.

Recent data support the theory of the involvement of IL-17 in the pathogenesis of several chronic inflammatory skin diseases (psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, acne, hidradenitis suppurativa) and autoimmune skin diseases (alopecia areata, vitiligo, bullous diseases). Even if the role of IL-17 in inflammatory and autoimmune diseases has been reported extensively, its role in tumor is still controversial. Some reports show that Th17 cells eradicate tumors, while others reveal that they promote the initiation and early growth of tumors. Herein, we review the role of IL-17 in the involvement of some common dermatologic diseases: psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, hidradenitis suppurativa, acne, vitiligo, melanoma, and nonmelanoma skin cancers., (© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society of Dermatology.)

Background: Inadequate treatment and delayed access to care represent critical issues regarding psoriasis. In Italy, patients treated with biologics are scanty and patients' misinformation could interfere with both biologics prescription and access to care. Literature provide data on disease awareness and perception about biologics in already-treated patients, but there is a lack of information concerning patients never treated with such drugs., Methods: We conducted a national survey including three academic-based psoriasis care centers at Bologna, Rome and Catania. A questionnaire named Psoriatic Patients's Awareness on Biologics (PPAB) was administered to patients naïve for biologics and accessing for the fist-time to a psoriasis care center., Results: Patients from Northern Italy referred to more reliable sources of information and awareness on biologics decreased from North to South. The increase of the Psoriasis Area Severity Index was associated to unawareness about biologics and impaired self-evaluation on the eligibility to treatment. Patients under systemic conventional /multiple therapy were more likely to be unaware about biologics., Conclusions: Our survey demonstrates that psoriatic patients' awareness is still an unmet need. For more, patients potentially eligible for biologics (severe or treated with systemic conventional/multiple therapy) were less informed. We believe that patients' misinformation could have delayed the access to a psoriasis care center, so that when patients sought help their condition was more severe and required systemic conventional/multiple therapy. Our results reiterate the importance of physicians in the information process and urge the need of a common network among office dermatologists, general practitioners and psoriasis care centers.

Erythroplasia of Queyrat (EQ) is a rare disease involving the mucosal and transitional surfaces of the penis. Effective treatment is necessary to minimize progression to squamous cell carcinoma. The standard therapy for EQ, partial or radical penectomy, is invasive; photodynamic therapy (PDT) may be an effective, non-surgical tissue-sparing option. We report the case of a 67-year-old patient with long-standing EQ who was suc-cessfully treated with methyl aminolevulinate-PDT (MAL-PDT). A complete clinical response, confirmedby incisional biopsy, was achieved af-ter fivesessions of every-other-week treatment. The patient experienced moderate edema, erythema and pain within 5-7 days after the treatment, without urination problems. Our experience and a review of the published literature suggest that MAL-PDT may represent a valuable treatment option for selected cases of histopathologically-confirmed EQ.

Background: Psoriasis is an inflammatory disease, that is increasingly being considered as a systemic disorder. Among associated comorbidities, metabolic syndrome plays an important role. The effects of biological therapies on metabolic syndrome is controversial., Methods: Thirty-one psoriatic patients with metabolic syndrome, eligible to treatment with anti-TNFα agents, were enrolled. Metabolic parameters were measured during 4 subsequent visits, one every 40 to 60 days. PASI, BSA and DLQI assessed the severity of psoriasis and the impact on quality of life., Results: We include 31 patients, 18 treated with etanercept and 13 with adalimumab. Metabolic parameters evaluated at V4 in both groups showed different trends in the blood glucose values: a slight decrease in adalimumab group, an increase in etanercept group, with an almost significant comparison test (P=0.073). Similarly, the lipid profile revealed an opposing trend, with an increase in triglycerides in adalimumab patients, and a decrease in the other group, without statistically significant differences. No statistically significant difference was recorded in HDL cholesterol. An improvement in systolic and diastolic pressure was appreciated in both groups, although not significantly. The waist circumference slightly decreased in both groups. PASI 75 score was reached in 60% of the patients. In addition, BSA and DLQI improved., Conclusions: Our study showed a slight improvement of metabolic parameters, at times with a trend toward significance. Additional long-term studies and a larger number of patients are needed to more clearly define the association between psoriasis and cardiovascular disease and understand the effect of biological therapies on metabolic parameters.