201. One size does not fit all: variations by ethnicity in demographic characteristics of men seeking fertility treatment across North America
- Author
-
Peter N. Kolettis, Kirk C. Lo, Robert E. Brannigan, Scott I. Zeitlin, Tung Chin M. Hsieh, Jared M. Bieniek, James M. Dupree, Edmund Y. Ko, Susan Lau, Victor Chow, James M. Hotaling, Ajay K. Nangia, Jason C. Hedges, Armand Zini, Mary K. Samplaski, Aaron Spitz, Keith Jarvi, Eugene F. Fuchs, David Shin, Andrew B. Chen, James F. Smith, Jay I. Sandlow, Thomas J. Walsh, Marc A. Fisher, Katherine Lajkosz, Marc Goldstein, Trustin Domes, Ethan D. Grober, and J. C. Trussell
- Subjects
Retrospective review ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Ethnic group ,Outcome measures ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Fertility ,Race (biology) ,Reproductive Medicine ,Male fertility ,Biologic Factors ,Medicine ,Racial differences ,business ,Demography ,media_common - Abstract
Objective To compare racial differences in male fertility history and treatment. Design Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Setting North American reproductive urology centers. Patient(s) Males undergoing urologist fertility evaluation. Intervention(s) None. Main Outcome Measure(s) Demographic and reproductive Andrology Research Consortium data. Result(s) The racial breakdown of 6,462 men was: 51% White, 20% Asian/Indo-Canadian/Indo-American, 6% Black, 1% Indian/Native, Conclusion(s) Racial differences exist for males undergoing fertility evaluation by a reproductive urologist. Better understanding of these differences in history in conjunction with societal and biologic factors can guide personalized care, as well as help to better understand and address disparities in access to fertility evaluation and treatment.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF