Search

Humans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful of others to the same extent. Individual differences have been found, but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one's location in the world? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined if and how social mindfulness differs across countries. At little to no material cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention or kindness. Even though fairly common, such low-cost cooperation has received little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across 31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n = 8,354), we found considerable variation. Among selected country-level variables, greater social mindfulness was most strongly associated with countries' better general performance on environmental protection. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targeting the kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communicating benevolence than on providing material benefits.

Bei brachyzephalen Hunden ist der Naseneingang fehlgebildet und hochgradig stenotisch. Diese Naseneingangsstenose wird seit Jahrzehnten diagnostiziert und im Rahmen des Brachyzephalen Syndroms chirurgisch behandelt. Bereits mit dem bloßen Auge kann die äußere 1. Stenose erkannt werden, verursacht durch den äußeren Anteil der Nasenflügel, der dem Septum nahezu anliegt und so die Naris fast vollständig verschließt. Der vestibuläre Anteil des Naseneingangs ist bei brachyzephalen Hunden von außen nicht zu beurteilen. In der Computertomographie und der Endoskopie wird deutlich, dass der voluminöse Bulbus, in dem der rostrale Anteil der Flügelfalte und der innere Anteil des Nasenflügels verschmelzen, den Nasenvorhof fast vollständig obstruiert und damit unmittelbar kaudal der ersten Stenose zu einer relevanten 2. Stenose des Naseneingangs führt. Zusätzlich ist die beim gesunden Hund ausgeprägte Abduktion des vestibulären Bulbus nach lateral während der Inspiration bei brachyzephalen Hunden eingeschränkt bis völlig fehlend. Zur Korrektur der Naseneingangsstenose wird in der Literatur bis heute eine 'Keilchen-Resektion' aus dem äußeren Anteil des Nasenflügels empfohlen. Diese Operationsmethode und ihre Modifikationen konzentrieren sich auf die Korrektur der von außen sichtbaren 1. Stenose. In den letzten 10 Jahren wird von Tierbesitzern nach dieser Operation immer häufiger ein ausbleibender Operationserfolg beklagt. Ziele der Untersuchungen: Es soll eine Operationsmethode beschrieben werden, mit der beide Stenosen des komplexen Naseneingangs chirurgisch korrigiert werden können. Zur Evaluierung dieser Operation soll anhand von CT-Untersuchungen das Luft-Volumen im Naseneingang brachyzephaler Hunde prä- und sechs Monate postoperativ gemessen werden. Brachyzephale Hunde, die zur Behandlung einer schweren respiratorischen Insuffizienz überwiesen wurden, wurden in die Studie aufgenommen. Es wurde eine Computertomographie durchgeführt und das Luft-Volumen im Naseneingang mit ein

While the ontogeny of prosociality during infancy, childhood, and adolescence has received substantial attention over the last decades, little is known about how prosocial preferences develop beyond emerging adulthood. Recent evidence suggests that the previously observed positive as- sociation between age and prosocial preferences is less robust than assumed. This study reports results on the association between social preferences, age, gender, and education from an Austrian representative sample (N = 777, aged 16–94 years) in which incentivized social value orientations (SVO) were measured along with various other sociodemographic characteristics. The analyses confirm that men are less prosocial than women, however, mainly during emerging adulthood (16–25 years). At the same time, the decline of prosociality is stronger among women leading to a conver- gence of prosociality between men and women as they age. Overall, we find that a prosocial value orientation is negatively correlated with people’s age. We suspect that the susceptibility of peoples’ social preferences to the preferences of others in their social environment is a critical factor unifying these different observations in the development of prosociality. We hypothesize that the opposite associations between age and SVO observed in two previous studies using unincentivized measures of social preferences are explained in parts by an age-related change in social desirability, measure- ment inaccuracy (continuous vs. categorical), and cross-cultural differences promoting competitive preferences among emerging adults in Japan. Moreover, we find that political orientations towards right-wing populists are consistently associated with less prosocial preferences, while education seems to be positively associated with prosociality. Overall, our study highlights the importance of conducting representative studies using incentivized measu

In real-world intergroup conflict, not all in-group members are equally threatened by the out-group. Yet, the impact of intragroup payoff asymmetry on the inclination to mutually cooperate during intergroup conflict and therefore to protect against out-group attacks, i.e., the “conflict-cooperation effect,” has not been investigated so far. In Study 1, we replicate previous research by using a novel experimental game paradigm, showing increased intragroup cooperation in the presence (vs. absence) of out-group threat under intragroup payoff symmetry. In Study 2, we find a conflict-cooperation effect among group members who are threatened (victims) as well as among group members who are not threatened (helpers) by the out-group. Intragroup cohesiveness, i.e., perceived closeness among in-group members, mediates the conflict-cooperation effect, particularly among selfishly-oriented individuals. Our results support the notion that intergroup conflict may have favored the evolutionary adaption of intragroup cooperation even when the in-group members were asymmetrically threatened by intergroup conflict.

Prosocial behaviors constitute vital ingredients for all types of social interactions and relationships as well as for society at large. Corresponding to this significance, the study of prosocial behaviors has received considerable attention across scientific disciplines. A striking feature of this research is that most disciplines rely on economic games to measure actual prosocial behavior in controlled experimental settings. However, empirical research often fails to fully exploit the richness of this class of paradigms. The current work aims to overcome this issue by providing a theory-driven overview of and introduction to the variety of economic games for researchers in psychology and beyond. Specifically, we introduce prominent theories of games (Game Theory and Interdependence Theory) and show how the concepts from these theories can be integrated in a unifying theoretical framework considering games as providing specific situational affordances for behavior. Additionally, we describe several games in detail, including their structural features, the affordances they involve, the social motives that may guide behavior, the flexibility they entail to manipulate specific situational aspects and, thus, affordances, and typical research findings. We conclude that tailored selection and combination of games and game variants allows to obtain a unique understanding of the underlying psychological processes involved in prosocial behavior. As a practical tool for researchers, we also provide standardized game instructions and guidelines for the implementation of games in future research. Ultimately, the review can foster optimal use of economic games in future work and thereby set the stage for high-class, replicable, and innovative research on human prosociality.

Humans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful ofothers to the same extent. Individual differences have been found,but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one’slocationintheworld? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined ifand how social mindfulness differsacross countries. At little to no ma-terial cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention orkindness. Even though fairly common,such low-cost cooperation hasreceived little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n=8,354), wefound considerable variation. Among selectedcountry-level variables,greater social mindfulness was moststrongly associated with countries’better general performance on environmental protection. Together,our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targetingthe kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communi-cating benevolence than on providing material benefits.

The strategy method is a powerful method for eliciting conditional cooperation in strategic interactions. Theoretically, players’ cooperation conditional on a specific level of others’ cooperation using the strategy method should be equal to their unconditional cooperation given an equivalent belief about others’ cooperation. However, using the Prisoner’s Dilemma, we show that decisions using the strategy method are more selfish than decisions under a simultaneous decision protocol predicted from players’ beliefs. This is driven entirely by lower cooperation among conditional cooperators with low expectations about others’ cooperation. We further show that relative to simultaneous choice, the strategy method shifts salient norms from an egalitarian fairness norm (‘give half’) to a reciprocity norm (‘match others’ behaviour’). This undermines cooperation among players with low beliefs about others’ cooperation. These results thus show that the strategy method does not merely hold beliefs constant, but also shifts which salient norms influence choice behaviour. This has important implications for the use of the strategy method in eliciting social preferences.

To solve the puzzle of individual participation in intergroup conflict, theoretical accounts rooted in various disciplines suggest that individuals’ interconnected social preferences for the welfare of in-group and out-group members predict their conflict engagement. Yet, research also suggests that individuals may reciprocate anticipated and actual harmful behaviour from out-group members or beneficial behaviour from in-group members. We combined these different approaches and tested the relative importance of preferences and beliefs in predicting conflict participation. To this end, we elicited both preferences towards in-group and out-group members and beliefs about in-group and out-group members’ behaviours prior to playing an incentivised intergroup conflict game with natural groups (N = 973). In this game, individuals could engage in costly behaviour to either benefit their in-group (without consequences to the out-group) or to both benefit their in-group and harm the out-group. Both preferences and beliefs contributed to explaining in-group beneficial and out-group harming behaviour. Importantly, however, beliefs were more strongly associated with behaviour than group-based preferences. Moreover, we found that negative reciprocity towards out-group members was stronger when the out-group was expected to actually harm the in-group rather than to merely harbour ill intentions. Taken together, the findings suggest that participation in intergroup conflict is better explained by positive and negative reciprocity than purely by group-based preferences.

It is often important to study people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors over time. To this end, researchers have relied on repeated cross-sectional (RCS) studies, in which different people from the same population participate on different measurement occasions. Also, researchers have relied on panel studies, in which the same group of people participate on different measurement occasions. However, few studies have directly tested whether participants' responses in RCS studies were similar to those found in panel studies. To address this gap, we compared the responses to 33 items, 28 of which were further grouped into four aggregates (Affections, Worries, States, Health concerns), over 8 weeks during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark in a RCS study (overall N = 5,993, per measurement occasion 616 ≤ n ≤ 964) with the responses in a largely equivalent panel study (993 ≤ n ≤ 2,546 across measurement occasions). The study participants were randomly drawn from the same quota-representative participant pool and responded to the same items on the same measurement occasions. Results indicated a few differences between the study samples on the first measurement occasion (i.e., selection effects between studies). Further, we found statistical support for different trajectories in 21 aggregates/items. However, visual inspection of the trajectories suggested subtle differences between the studies at large. The results thus raise awareness that the trajectories of people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors can differ between survey methods, especially when only a few measurement occasions are considered. Nevertheless, such differences might not be substantial over time.

Despite the omnipresence of inter-group conflicts, little is known about the heterogeneity and stability of individuals’ social preferences toward in-group and out-group members. To identify the prevalence and stability of social preferences in inter-group conflict, we gather quota-representative, incentivized data from a lab-in-the-field study during the heated 2016 Austrian presidential election. We assess social preferences toward in-group and out-group members one week before, one week after, and three months after the election. We find considerable heterogeneity in individuals’ group-(in)dependent social preferences. Utilizing various econometric strategies, we find largely stable social preferences over the course of conflict. Yet, there is some indication of variation, particularly when the conflict becomes less salient. Variation is larger in social preferences toward in-group members and among specific preference types. We discuss the theoretical implications of our findings and outline potential avenues for future research.

Unethical behavior is often accompanied by others covering up a transgressor’s actions. We devised a novel behavioral paradigm, the Unethical Loyalty Game (ULG), to study individuals’ willingness to lie to cover up others’ dishonesty. Specifically, we examined (i) whether and to what extent individuals are willing to lie to cover up others’ unethical behavior, (ii) whether this unethical loyalty depends on the benefits (bribe) at stake, and (iii) whether trait Honesty–Humility accounts for interindividual variability in unethical loyalty. In a fully incentivized experiment (N = 288), we found a high prevalence of lying to cover up others’ unethical behavior, which increased with increasing bribes. In turn, unethical loyalty decreased with individuals’ Honesty–Humility levels. Overall, the findings show that most but not all individuals are corruptible to disguise others’ transgressions. Future research using the ULG can help to further illuminate (the determinants of) this prevalent type of unethical behavior.

Das Ultraschall-Punktschweißen von faserverstärkten thermoplastischen Kunststoffen hat in der letzten Zeit bei Forschern in der Luftfahrt- und Automobilindustrie großes Interesse hervorgerufen. Es bietet eine effiziente Lösung zum Verbinden großer thermoplastischer Verbundbauteile durch Punktschweißen mit einem hohen Automatisierungsgrad. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurde eine neue Technik zum Fokussieren der Ultraschallschwingungsenergie an der gewünschten Fügestelle zwischen zwei Fügepartnern aus thermoplastischen Verbundlaminaten untersucht. Bei diesem untersuchten Verfahren waren keine zusätzlichen Energierichtungsgeber zwischen den Fügepartnern erforderlich, um die Vibrationsenergie zu fokussieren. Es wurde festgestellt, dass es durch Schweißen der Laminate zwischen einer Sonotrode und einem Amboss möglich war, eine lokalisierte Wärme durch Reibung zu erzeugen in dem die Sonotrode eine größere Kontaktfläche mit dem Laminat als mit dem Amboss aufwies. In der Anfangsphase des Schweißens wurden die Grenzflächenschichten durch die reibungsverursachte Erwärmung abgeschwächt. Folglich zentrierte sich die zyklische Verformung in diesen abgeschwächten Grenzflächen. Die Annahme des Vorhandenseins der Reibung und ihres Einflusses auf die Wärmeerzeugung wurde mittels mechanischer FEM-Analyse untersucht. Die mikroskopische Analyse des Schweißpunktes lieferte schließlich den Beweis für die Schmelzauslösung an einem Ring um den Schweißpunkt und das anschließende Punktwachstum. Um die räumliche Verteilung der Temperatur und ihre zeitliche Entwicklung in der Schweißzone während des Ultraschallschweißprozesses besser zu verstehen, wurde das thermische Problem numerisch modelliert. Zur Verifizierung der mathematischen Modelle wurden die berechneten Zeitverläufe der Temperatur im Schweißpunktzentrum mit den experimentell ermittelten Werten unter vergleichbaren Bedingungen gegenübergestellt. Es wurde festgestellt, dass nach einer bestimmten Schweißzeit die Temperatur im Schweißzent, The ultrasonic spot welding of fibre-reinforced thermoplastic composites has recently received strong interest among researchers mainly in the fields of aerospace and automotive industries. It offers an efficient solution to join large thermoplastic composite parts through the spot welding approach with a high level of automation. In this study, a new technique for focusing the ultrasonic vibration energy at the desired spot between two mating thermoplastic composite laminates was investigated. In this method, no additional energy directing protrusions between the weldments were required to focus the vibration energy. It was found that by welding the laminates amid an ultrasonic sonotrode and an anvil in which the prior had a larger contact surface with the laminate as the latter, it was possible to generate a localised frictional heating. In the initial phase of the welding, the frictional heating softened the interfacial layers and thus caused the focusing of the strain energy in the weld spot centre. The assumption for the presence of the friction and its influence on the heat generation was investigated by means of finite element method analysis. Microscopic analysis of the weld spot delivered the proof for the melt initiation at a ring around the weld spot and subsequent inwards growth of the weld spot. In order to gain a better understanding of the temperature spatial distribution and its temporal development in the weld zone during the ultrasonic welding process, the thermal problem was analysed using the explicit finite difference method. The mathematical model was verified through a comparison between the calculated temperature curves and the experimentally obtained counterparts. It was found that after a certain weld duration the temperature in the weld centre underwent a sudden increase and caused the overheating and decomposition of the polymer in the weld spot. It was observed that the time trace of the consumed power curve by the welder followed a simi

The COVID-19 pandemic presents a major challenge to societies all over the globe. Two measures implemented in many countries to curb the spread of the disease are (a) minimizing close contact between people (“physical distancing”) and (b) wearing of face masks. In the present research, we tested the idea that physical distancing and wearing of face masks can be the result of a prosocial emotional process—empathy for people most vulnerable to the virus. In four preregistered studies (N = 3,718, Western population), we found that (a) empathy indeed relates to the motivation to adhere to physical distancing and to wearing face masks and (b) inducing empathy for people most vulnerable to the virus promotes the motivation to adhere to these measures (whereas merely providing information about the importance of the measures does not). In sum, the present research provides a better understanding of the factors underlying the willingness to follow two important measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To avoid the dangerous consequences of climate change, humans need to overcome two intertwined conflicts. First, they must deal with an intra-generational conflict that emerges from the allocation of costs of climate change mitigation among different actors of the current generation. Second, they face an inter-generational conflict that stems from the higher costs for long-term mitigation measures, particularly helping future generations, compared to the short-term actions aimed at adapting to the immediate effects of climate change, benefiting mostly the current generation. We devise a novel game to study this multi-level conflict and investigate individuals’ behavior in a lab experiment. We find that, although individuals reach sufficient cooperation levels to avoid adverse consequences for their own generation, they contribute more to cheaper short-term than to costlier long-term measures, to the detriment of future generations. Simple “nudge” interventions, however, may alter this pattern considerably. We find that changing the default contribution level to the inter-generational welfare optimum increases long-term contributions. Moreover, providing individuals with the possibility to commit themselves to inter-generational solidarity leads to an even stronger increase in long-term contributions. Nevertheless, the results also suggest that nudges alone may not be enough to induce inter-generationally optimal contributions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has required massive behavioural adaptions to curb the spread of the disease. Since March 2020, the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) survey has assessed (and continues to do so) Danish citizens’ perceptions and behavioural reactions to the COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we report selected results of the COSMO survey, highlighting factors related to the Danish response strategy

In the present research, we test the mechanisms (Studies 1a and 1b, conducted online), consequences, and limitations (Study 2, conducted in the lab) of anthropomorphizing autonomous (vs. manual) products. Building on previous theoretical and empirical research on product anthropomorphism, we argue and find that anthropomorphism is perceived to be more congruent with autonomous products than with manual products. Furthermore, we show that anthropomorphism increases the liking of autonomous products, given that consumers have no prior experience with autonomous products. Increased liking of autonomous products due to anthropomorphism, in turn, increases purchase intentions and positive evaluations of outcomes obtained by the autonomous product. The findings are discussed with regard to optimal marketing and design of autonomous products.

We review psychological research on intergroup conflict. First, we outline psychological perspectives on forms and functions of groups. Second, we present the most influential psychological theories of intergroup conflict and describe their similarities and differences in predicting individual prejudice, discrimination, and conflict engagement. Third, we review popular measures of intergroup discrimination, including rating measures, behavioral measures, and allocation tasks. Furthermore, we call for a refined semantic framework to structure and differentiate between different measures of intergroup bias. Fourth, we highlight several interventions that can de-bias intergroup relations and facilitate conflict resolution. Lastly, we propose that research on the psychology of intergroup conflict may benefit from a stronger interdisciplinary orientation regarding both theoretical perspectives and methods used and point out promising avenues for future research.

Background More and more countries are discussing the introduction of mandatory vaccination policies. Yet, little is known about individuals’ actual preferences for voluntary vs. mandatory vaccination policies, and the psychological processes underlying such preferences. Objective of the present research was to investigate the development of individual preferences for voluntary and mandatory vaccination policies. Methods We conducted a controlled laboratory study (N = 168) using a repeated interactive vaccination game with decision-contingent monetary incentives. In each round, participants decided in favour of either a voluntary or a mandatory vaccination policy, followed by the vaccination decision (voluntary policy) or vaccination (mandatory policy) which both resulted in actual (financial) consequences. Results We observe large heterogeneity in participants’ preferences for the voluntary vs. mandatory policy. Under voluntary vaccination, the preference for the mandatory policy increased with decreasing vaccination rates (and increasing risk of infection). In contrast, experiencing vaccine-adverse events under mandatory vaccination increased the preference for the voluntary policy. The latter effect was larger for individuals with a negative (vs. positive) attitude toward vaccination. Overall, as individuals gathered experiences under both the voluntary and the mandatory policy, the preference for voluntary vaccination policy increased over time. Conclusions Individuals are more willing to accept mandatory vaccination policies when vaccination rates are low. In the long run, the occurrence of vaccine-adverse events may spark opposition to mandatory vaccination.

Engaging in personally costly within-group cooperation benefits one’s in-group members but also impacts other groups by benefiting, neglecting, or harming out-group members, leading to a range of potential consequences for between-group relations (e.g., collaboration vs. competition). We introduce the Intergroup Parochial and Universal Cooperation (IPUC) game to investigate the prevalence of the individual preferences underlying these different expressions of within-group cooperation: universalism, weak parochialism, and strong parochialism. In two online experiments with natural groups, we show that the IPUC has value beyond existing economic games in measuring these preferences separately. In a third experiment conducted in the lab, we show how dispositional measures traditionally associated with within- and between-group cooperation, that is, social value orientation, social dominance orientation, honesty-humility, and empathic concern, predict different preferences. Thus, the IPUC provides a tool to better understand within- and between-group interactions and to test interventions to overcome intergroup conflict.

Humans are considered a highly cooperative species. Through cooperation, we can tackle shared problems like climate change or pandemics and cater for shared needs like shelter, mobility, or healthcare. However, cooperation invites free-riding and can easily break down. Maybe because of this reason, societies also enable individuals to solve shared problems individually, like in the case of private healthcare plans or private retirement planning. Such "self-reliance" allows individuals to avoid problems related to public goods provision, like free-riding or underprovision, and decreases social interdependence. However, not everyone can equally afford to be self-reliant, and amid shared problems, self-reliance may lead to conflicts within groups on how to solve shared problems. In two preregistered studies, we investigate how the ability of self-reliance influences collective action and cooperation. We show that self-reliance crowds out cooperation and exacerbates inequality, especially when some heavily depend on collective action while others do not. However, we also show that groups are willing to curtail their ability of self-reliance. When given the opportunity, groups overwhelmingly vote in favor of abolishing individual solutions to shared problems, which, in turn, increases cooperation and decreases inequality, particularly between group members that differ in their ability to be self-reliant. The support for such endogenously imposed interdependence, however, reduces when individual solutions become more affordable, resonating with findings of increased individualism in wealthier societies and suggesting a link between wealth inequality and favoring individual independence and freedom over communalism and interdependence. Keywords: cooperation; endogenous choice; individualism; interdependence; social dilemma