Search

Introduction: Mechanical breakage of cephalomedullary nail osteosynthesis is a rare complication attributed to delayed fracture union or nonunion. This study presents a series of cases of breakage and secondary lag screw dislocation after cephalomedullary nailing. The aim of this study was to identify factors that contribute to cephalomedullary nail breakage. Materials and methods: In a retrospective case series review between 02/2005 and 12/2013, we analyzed 453 patients with trochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture who had been treated by cephalomedullary nailing. Fractures were classified according to AO/OTA classification. 13 patients with cephalomedullary nail breakage were included (failure rate 2.9 %). Results: Seven patients were women, and six men with a mean age of 72 years (range 35-94). Implant breakage occurred 6 months postoperatively (range 1-19 months). In ten cases, breakage was secondary to delayed or nonunion, which was thought to be mainly due to insufficient reduction of the fracture, and in two cases due to loss of the lag screw because of missing set screw. In one case, breakage was apparent during elective metal removal following complete fracture healing. Short-term outcome was evaluated 6 months after operative revision using Harris hip score in 11 out of 13 patients showing a mean score of 84 %. Complete radiological fracture healing has been found in 11 patients available for follow-up within 6 months after revision surgery. Discussion: Breakage of cephalomedullary nail osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures is a severe complication. The results of our study demonstrate that revision surgery provides good clinical and radiological short-term results. Predominately, failures of trochanteric fractures are related to lack of surgeon performance. Therefore, application of the implant requires accurate preoperative planning, advanced surgical experience to evaluate the patient and the fracture classification, and precise surgical technique including attention to detail and anatomical reduction of the fracture fragments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aim of this study was to evaluate prognosis of severely injured patients. Methods: All severely injured patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ⩾ 50 were identified in a 6-year-period between 2000 and 2005 in German Level 1 Trauma Center Murnau. Data was evaluated from German Trauma Registry and Polytrauma Outcome Chart of the German Society for Trauma Surgery and a personal interview to assess working ability and disability and are presented as average. Results: 88 out of 1435 evaluated patients after severe polytrauma demonstrated an ISS ⩾ 50 (6.5%), among them 23% women and 77% men. 66 patients (75%) had an ISS of 50-60, 14 (16%) 61-70, and 8 (9%) ⩾ 70. In 27% of patients trauma was caused by motor bike accidents. 3.6 body regions were involved. Patients had to be operated 5.3 times and were treated 23 days in the ICU and stayed 73 days in hospital. Mortality rate was 36% and rate of multi-organ failure 28%. 15% of patients demonstrated severe senso-motoric dysfunction as well as residues of severe head injury. 25% recovered well or at least moderately. 29 out of 56 survivors answered the POLO-chart. A personal interview was performed with 13 patients. The state of health was at least moderate in 72% of patients. In 48% interpersonal problems and in 41% severe pain was observed. In 57% of patients problems with working ability regarding duration, as well as quantitative and qualitative performance were observed. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder were found in 41%. The more distal the lesions were located (foot/ankle) the more functional disability affected daily life. In only 15%, working ability was not impaired. 8 out of 13 interviewed patients demonstrated complete work disability. Conclusions: Even severely injured patients after multiple trauma have a good prognosis. The ISS is an established tool to assess severity and prognosis of trauma, whereas prediction of clinical outcome cannot be deducted from this score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine the long term-results after thoracoscopic spondylodesis particularly with respect to a ventral versus dorso-ventral treatment strategy. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, a follow-up examination was performed in 19 patients (seven men, 12 women, average age: 37.7 years, follow-up rate: 79 %), six years after ventral thoracoscopic spondylodesis of unstable, incomplete burst fractures. Nine patients received a ventral monosegmental spondylodesis with iliac crest bone graft. The other ten cases were treated dorso-ventrally, five undergoing a ventral monosegmental treatment with iliac crest bone graft; the other five a ventral bisegmental treatment with expandable titanium cage. Results: The complication rate was 15.7 %, the rate of revision of 10.5 %. No complication was related to the ventral thoracoscopic approach, whereas all of them were related to the iliac crest bone graft. The operative bisegmental kyphotic reduction was higher in the dorso-ventrally treated group. Afterwards, the loss of reduction was similar in both study groups. The mean VAS spine score summed up to more than 80 in both groups. The mean PCS scores were comparable to a normal healthy collective of the same age. Conclusions: The ventral thoracoscopic approach to the spine seems to be a safe therapeutic strategy. A dorso-ventral treatment concept goes along with a higher operative reduction potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of the study was to identify risk factors of failed two-stage procedures in cases of chronic posttraumatic periprosthetic hip infections. Patients and methods: Between 2006 and 2008, 26 patients with chronic posttraumatic periprosthetic infections after hip arthroplasty were included. In all cases operative bacterial eradication was initiated. The therapy was carried out according to a standardized treatment protocol including the eradication of the bacterial infection and the prosthetic replacement after three negative intra-operative specimens as a two-stage procedure. Follow-up was performed at least 2 years after revision procedure. Results: Twelve patients showed no signs of infectious recurrence 2 years after prosthetic hip revision therapy (46 %) and were assigned to group I. Group II is constituted by the other 14 patients (54 %). Four of them (16 %) suffered from an infectious recurrence after prosthetic hip replacement, ten patients (38 %) were characterised by a failed bacterial eradication. The spectrum of pathogens showed a significantly higher resistance pattern ( p = 0.001) in group II, with a majority of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and highly resistant Pseudomonas. In addition, patients of group II offered significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores ( p = 0.015), the body mass index (BMI) was significantly elevated ( p = 0.031) and received a significantly higher number of operative procedures ( p = 0.016). Conclusions: A reduced general state of health, a high BMI and highly resistant pathogens are the main risk factors for a failed two-stage procedure after chronic posttraumatic periprosthetic hip infections. Therefore, different treatment strategies are required for a defined subgroup of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Fractures of the proximal tibia occur very often and are a great challenge for trauma surgeons to stabilize. Although locked nails were developed to stabilize these fractures, this technique has not been sufficiently investigated. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically assess the stability of locked intramedullary nailing compared to locked plating. Methods: 16 fresh frozen human cadaveric tibiae were osteotomized in the meta-diaphyseal intersection with an osteotomy gap of 10 mm and a single osteotomy through the medial epicondyle to simulate a 41-C.2 fracture. Stabilization was performed with an angle stable locked Targon-TX nail ( n = 8) and two additional canulated screws. The other testing group ( n = 8) was treated with two canulated screws and a five-hole LCP-PLT. The bones were tested in a cyclic testing protocol with increasing loads under compression and a load sharing of 60 % through the medial tibial plateau and 40 % to the lateral side. Stiffness and fracture gap movement were measured and failure mode was assessed. Results: No significant differences were found between the two implants regarding load until failure. The stiffness of the intramedullary nailing group (927 N/mm) was statistically significantly higher than the stiffness of the plating group (564 N/mm). No differences were found for fracture gap movement in the z-axis. However, differences were found for dislocation of the proximal-lateral and proximal-medial fragments, with absolute values of 0.099 mm in the plate group and 0.66 mm in the nailing group at 800 N. Prior to failure, fracture gap movement was 0.22 mm for the plating group and 1.66 mm for the nailing group, a difference that was also statistically significantly different. The nailing group failed by screw cut-out while the plating group failed by screw breakage. Conclusion: Nailing of proximal tibia fractures leads to a stiffer implant-bone construct than plating. Since no adverse effects were found after nailing it seems to be a good alternative to plating for intra-articular proximal tibia fractures, especially in patients with soft tissue problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Autologous bone graft is the gold standard for vertebral body replacement. Currently, after modern implants for vertebral body replacement are available, controversies exist regarding the optimal implant strategy. Patients and methods: Between 2002 and 2003, 17 patients were included in this study, all suffering from incomplete burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. All of them were treated by ventral monosegmental spondylodesis using iliac crest bone graft. The individual treatment strategy depended on the fracture situation and patient's condition. After an average of 74 months (range 66-84) a clinical and computer tomographic follow-up examination was performed in 14 patients (average age, 35.2 years) including VAS spine score and SF 36 score. Nine patients were treated ventral only five patients dorsoventrally. Results: Complete osseous consolidation was visible in nine, partial consolidation (>30 %) in four, and lysis in one patient, without any significant differences between ventral only or dorsoventral approach. After removal of the fixateur interne the level of consolidation improved in all patients, treated dorsoventrally. There was no significant correlation between percentage of osseous consolidation and the clinical follow-up parameters. After 6 years, 71 % of the patients suffered from persistent pain associated with the approach to the iliac crest. Two revision surgeries have been necessary. Conclusion: High rates of osseous consolidation are visible 6 years after ventral spondylodesis by iliac crest bone grafts. A further improvement of consolidation can be expected after dorsal implant removal. But the surgical approach to the iliac crest is accompanied with a relevant complication rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Two major therapeutic principles can be employed for the treatment of distal femoral fractures: retrograde intramedullary (IM) nailing (RN) or less invasive stabilization on system (LISS). Both operative stabilizing systems follow the principle of biological osteosynthesis. IM nailing protects the soft-tissue envelope due to its minimally invasive approach and closed reduction techniques better than distal femoral locked plating. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare outcome of distal femur fracture stabilization using RN or LISS techniques. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study from 2003 to 2008, we analyzed 115 patients with distal femur fracture who had been treated by retrograde IM nailing (59 patients) or LISS plating (56 patients). In the two cohort groups, mean age was 54 years (17-89 years). Mechanism of injury was high energy impact in 57% (53% RN, 67% LISS) and low-energy injury in 43% (47% RN, 33% LISS), respectively. Fractures were classified according to AO classification: there were 52 type A fractures (RN 31, LISS 21) and 63 type C fractures (RN 28, LISS 35); 32% (RN) and 56% (LISS) were open and 68% (RN) and 44% (LISS) were closed fractures, respectively. Functional and radiological outcome was assessed. Results: Clinical and radiographic evaluation demonstrated osseous healing within 6 months following RN and following LISS plating in over 90% of patients. However, no statistically significant differences were found for the parameters time to osseous healing, rate of nonunion, and postoperative complications. The following complications were treated: hematoma formation (one patient RN and three patients LISS), superficial infection (one patient RN and three patients LISS), deep infection (2 patients LISS). Additional secondary bone grafting for successful healing 3 months after the primary operation was required in four patients in the RN (7% of patients) and six in the LISS group (10% of patients). Accumulative result of functional outcome using the Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) score demonstrated in type A fractures a score of 263 (RN) and 260 (LISS), and in type C fractures 257 (RN) and 218 (LISS). Differences between groups for type A were statistically insignificant, statistical analysis for type C fractures between the two groups are not possible, since in type C2 and C3 fractures only LISS plating was performed. Conclusion: Both retrograde IM nailing and angular stable plating are adequate treatment options for distal femur fractures. Locked plating can be used for all distal femur fractures including complex type C fractures, periprosthetic fractures, as well as osteoporotic fractures. IM nailing provides favorable stability and can be successfully implanted in bilateral or multisegmental fractures of the lower extremity as well as in extra-articular fractures. However, both systems require precise preoperative planning and advanced surgical experience to reduce the risk of revision surgery. Clinical outcome largely depends on surgical technique rather than on the choice of implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]