201. The Golden Proportion in Dentistry: A Literature Review
- Author
-
Amir Ali Karamifar, Ali Mokhtar, Isa Safari, Mohammad Sadegh Nazari, Sina Kousha, Ali Hasani, and Maryam Davari
- Subjects
Review study ,Dental use ,Dentition ,business.industry ,animal diseases ,education ,Rehabilitation ,MEDLINE ,Dentistry ,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ,Context (language use) ,030206 dentistry ,English language ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Systematic review ,Medicine ,Maxillary central incisor ,business - Abstract
Context: In the last 2 decades, several studies have questioned the application of the rule of the golden proportion in dentistry. Therefore, the purpose of this review study was to assess the dental use of the golden proportion. Evidence Acquisition: We performed MEDLINE and Cochrane searches for English language literature published through 2015 using the following terms: golden proportion, golden ratio, and dentistry. Additional articles were then retrieved through hand searching the reference lists of the above articles. The manuscripts selected included review articles, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Results: The findings showed that the mean ratio of the relative widths of the central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines was 1.6:1:0.85 on both sides. The ratios were not influenced by either sex or previous orthodontic treatment. Conclusions: The results suggest that the rule of the golden proportion should not be used for treatment planning without observing individual modifying factors. Moreover, orthodontic treatment does not change the dentition toward the golden proportion.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF