Marc Miravitlles, Diana Nieves, Alexandra Solé, Helena Aguilar, Jaume Costa-Samarra, Maria Mallén-Alberdi, Ana Ampudia, Institut Català de la Salut, [Miravitlles M] Servei de Pneumologia, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain. CIBER for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain. [Solé A, Ampudia A] Market Access Department of Boehringer Ingelheim SA, Barcelona, Spain. [Aguilar H] Medical Department of Boehringer Ingelheim SA, Barcelona, Spain. [Costa-Samarra J, Mallén-Alberdi M] Oblikue Consulting SL, Barcelona, Spain, and Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus
Marc Miravitlles,1 Alexandra Solé,2 Helena Aguilar,3 Ana Ampudia,2 Jaume Costa-Samarra,4 Maria Mallén-Alberdi,4 Diana Nieves4 1Pneumology Department, Vall dâHebron University Hospital, Vall dâHebron Research Institute (VHIR), Vall dâHebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, CIBER for Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Barcelona, Spain; 2Market Access Department of Boehringer Ingelheim SA, Barcelona, Spain; 3Medical Department of Boehringer Ingelheim SA, Barcelona, Spain; 4Oblikue Consulting SL, Barcelona, SpainCorrespondence: Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Vall dâHebron University Hospital, Vall dâHebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, P. Vall dâHebron 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, SpainEmail marcm@separ.esObjective: The objective of this study was to assess the non-adherence level of Spanish clinical practice to guideline recommendations for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to estimate the potential impact on pharmaceutical expenditure resulting from transitioning current treatment patterns according to guidelines.Methods: A model was developed to compare current prescribing patterns with two alternative scenarios: the first aligned with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD 2020) recommendations, and the second with the Spanish Guidelines for COPD (GesEPOC 2017). Current treatment practice was obtained from publications that describe treatment patterns by pulmonology departments in Spain. The economic impact between patterns was calculated from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS), considering the annual pharmacological costs of COPD inhaled maintenance therapy. Two additional analyses were performed: one that included current prescribing patterns of patients managed by pulmonology and primary care centers in Spain (published aggregated data); and another that only considered the appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) treatment according to guidelines.Results: It was estimated that 54% and 38% of patients were not treated in line with GOLD and GesEPOC recommendations, respectively, mainly due to a broader use of ICS-based therapies. Adapting treatment to recommendations could provide a potential annual cost-saving of ⬠17,792,022 (according to GOLD) and ⬠5,881,785 (according to GesEPOC). In scenario analysis 1, a 26% of non-adherence to GesEPOC guideline was observed with a potential annual pharmacological cost-saving of ⬠2,707,554. In scenario analysis 2, considering only inappropriate use of ICS treatment, an annual cost-saving of ⬠17,863,750 (according to GOLD) and ⬠9,904,409 (according to GesEPOC) was calculated.Conclusion: More than a third of treatments for COPD patients in Spain are not prescribed in accordance with guideline recommendations. The adaptation of clinical practice to guideline recommendations could provide important cost-savings for the Spanish NHS.Keywords: cost, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Spanish, treatment, recommendations