2,949 results on '"A. Loupy"'
Search Results
202. 341 A phase i/ii, double-blind, placebo-controlled study assessing safety and efficacy of c1 esterase inhibitor for prevention of delayed graft function in recipients of deceased donor kidney transplant
- Author
-
Jordan, SC, Choi, J, Aubert, O, Haas, M, Loupy, A, Huang, E, Peng, A, Kim, I, Louie, S, Najar, R, Puliyanda, D, and Vo, A
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
203. Complement inhibition for prevention of antibody-mediated rejection in immunologically high-risk heart allograft recipients
- Author
-
Dael Geft, Michelle M. Kittleson, Michele A. Hamilton, David Chang, Guillaume Coutance, Osamu Seguchi, Lawrence S.C. Czer, Jignesh Patel, Alexandre Loupy, Babak Azarbal, Shaida Varnous, Jon A. Kobashigawa, Evan P. Kransdorf, Xiaohai Zhang, and Deanna Dilibero
- Subjects
Graft Rejection ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Allosensitization ,medicine.medical_treatment ,030230 surgery ,Gastroenterology ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,HLA Antigens ,Isoantibodies ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Immunology and Allergy ,Pharmacology (medical) ,B cell ,Retrospective Studies ,Heart transplantation ,Transplantation ,biology ,business.industry ,Panel reactive antibody ,Eculizumab ,Allografts ,Kidney Transplantation ,Clinical trial ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,biology.protein ,Antibody ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Allosensitization represents a major barrier to heart transplantation (HTx). We assessed the efficacy and safety of complement inhibition at transplant in highly sensitized heart transplant recipients. We performed a single-center, single-arm, open-label trial (NCT02013037). Patients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) ≥70% and pre-formed donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were eligible. In addition to standard of care, patients received nine infusions of eculizumab during the first 2 months posttransplant. The primary composite endpoint was antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) ≥pAMR2 and/or left ventricular dysfunction during the first year. Secondary endpoints included hemodynamic compromise, allograft rejection, and patient survival. Twenty patients were included. Median cPRA and mean fluorescence intensity of immunodominant DSA were 95% (90%-97%) and 6250 (5000-10 000), respectively. Retrospective B cell and T cell flow crossmatches were positive in 14 and 11 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint occurred in four patients (20%). Survival at 1 year was 90% with no deaths resulting from AMR. In a prespecified analysis comparing treated patients to matched control patients, we observed a dramatic reduction in the risk of biopsy-proven AMR in patients treated with eculizumab (HR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.14-0.95, p = .032). Our findings support the prophylactic use of complement inhibition for heart transplantation at high immunological risk. ClinincalTrials.gov, NCT02013037.
- Published
- 2021
204. Time-dependent lymphocyte count after transplantation is associated with higher risk of graft failure and death
- Author
-
Dujardin, Amaury, Lorent, Marine, Brouard, Sophie, Blancho, Gilles, Branchereau, Julien, Cantarovich, Diego, Chapelet, Agnès, Dantal, Jacques, Deltombe, Clément, Figueres, Lucile, Garandeau, Claire, Giral, Magali, Gourraud-Vercel, Caroline, Hourmant, Maryvonne, Karam, Georges, Kerleau, Clarisse, Meurette, Aurélie, Ville, Simon, Kandell, Christine, Moreau, Anne, Renaudin, Karine, Cesbron, Anne, Delbos, Florent, Walencik, Alexandre, Devis, Anne, Amrouche, Lucile, Anglicheau, Dany, Aubert, Olivier, Bererhi, Lynda, Legendre, Christophe, Loupy, Alexandre, Martinez, Frank, Sberro-Soussan, Rébecca, Scemla, Anne, Tinel, Claire, Zuber, Julien, Lenain, Rémi, Boucquemont, Julie, Leffondré, Karen, Couchoud, Cécile, Lassalle, Mathilde, Hazzan, Marc, Foucher, Yohann, Kidney Transplant Center [CHU Necker], CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5), and Université de Paris (UP)
- Subjects
Graft Rejection ,0301 basic medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Lymphocyte ,030232 urology & nephrology ,Renal function ,Kidney ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Risk Factors ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Lymphocyte Count ,Risk factor ,ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS ,Immunosuppression Therapy ,Proportional hazards model ,business.industry ,Graft Survival ,Immunosuppression ,Kidney Transplantation ,3. Good health ,Transplantation ,030104 developmental biology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Nephrology ,Etiology ,business - Abstract
The transplantation field requires the identification of specific risk factors associated with the level of immunosuppression. Here, our aim was to analyze the association between the number of circulating lymphocytes, monitored routinely by complete blood cell counts during outpatient visits, and patient and graft survival. In total, 2,999 kidney or combined kidney-pancreas recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2016, from two University hospitals, were enrolled. We investigated the etiological relationship between time-dependent lymphocyte count beyond one year after transplantation and patient and graft survival, viral infection and cancer risk using time-dependent multivariate Cox models. Model 1 considered kidney function at one year and model 2 as time-dependent variable. At the time of inclusion (one year after transplantation), 584 patients (19.4%) had deep lymphopenia (under 750 /mm3) and 1,072 (35.7%) had a normal count (over 1,500 /mm3). A patient with deep lymphopenia at a given follow-up time had significantly higher risks of graft failure, death and viral infection than comparable patients with a normal lymphocyte count at the same time point. Thus, after the first year of transplantation, the occurrence of deep lymphopenia within a patient's follow-up is a risk factor for long-term graft failure, death and viral infection.
- Published
- 2021
205. Data-driven Derivation and Validation of Novel Phenotypes for Acute Kidney Transplant Rejection using Semi-supervised Clustering
- Author
-
Aleksandar Senev, Maud Rabeyrin, Valérie Dubois, Dirk Kuypers, Olivier Thaunat, Jasper Callemeyn, Evelyne Lerut, Amaryllis H. Van Craenenbroeck, Elisabet Van Loon, Gillian Divard, T. Vaulet, Katrien De Vusser, Maarten Naesens, Ben Sprangers, Olivier Aubert, Maarten De Vos, Bart De Moor, Alexandre Loupy, and Marie-Paule Emonds
- Subjects
business.industry ,Rand index ,General Medicine ,Computational biology ,030230 surgery ,medicine.disease ,Phenotype ,Data-driven ,Euclidean distance ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Categorization ,Nephrology ,Medicine ,Observational study ,030212 general & internal medicine ,business ,Cluster analysis ,Kidney transplantation - Abstract
Background Over the past decades, an international group of experts iteratively developed a consensus classification of kidney transplant rejection phenotypes, known as the Banff classification. Data-driven clustering of kidney transplant histologic data could simplify the complex and discretionary rules of the Banff classification, while improving the association with graft failure. Methods The data consisted of a training set of 3510 kidney-transplant biopsies from an observational cohort of 936 recipients. Independent validation of the results was performed on an external set of 3835 biopsies from 1989 patients. On the basis of acute histologic lesion scores and the presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies, stable clustering was achieved on the basis of a consensus of 400 different clustering partitions. Additional information on kidney-transplant failure was introduced with a weighted Euclidean distance. Results Based on the proportion of ambiguous clustering, six clinically meaningful cluster phenotypes were identified. There was significant overlap with the existing Banff classification (adjusted rand index, 0.48). However, the data-driven approach eliminated intermediate and mixed phenotypes and created acute rejection clusters that are each significantly associated with graft failure. Finally, a novel visualization tool presents disease phenotypes and severity in a continuous manner, as a complement to the discrete clusters. Conclusions A semisupervised clustering approach for the identification of clinically meaningful novel phenotypes of kidney transplant rejection has been developed and validated. The approach has the potential to offer a more quantitative evaluation of rejection subtypes and severity, especially in situations in which the current histologic categorization is ambiguous.
- Published
- 2021
206. Aides à la navigation dans un corpus de transcriptions d'oral.
- Author
-
Frédérik Cailliau and Claude de Loupy
- Published
- 2007
207. Redefining Risk Stratification and Endpoints for Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplantation: Rationale and Methodology of Proposals Submitted to the European Medicines Agency by the European Society for Organ Transplantation
- Author
-
Maarten, Naesens, Stefan, Schneeberger, the ESOT Working Group, Jan Ulrich Becker, Bellini, MARIA IRENE, Oriol, Bestard, Böhmig, Georg A., Klemens, Budde, Fergus, Caskey, Frans, Claas, Lionel, Couzi, Fritz, Diekmann, Fabienne, Dobbels, Lucrezia, Furian, Denis, Glotz, Josep, Grinyó, Uwe, Heemann, Dennis, Hesselink, Luuk, Hilbrands, Ina, Jochmans, Alexandre, Loupy, Nizam, Mamode, Rainer, Oberbauer, Liset, Pengel, Marion, Rabant, Marlies, Reinders, Lionel, Rostaing, Candice, Roufosse, Daniel, Seron, and Olivier Thaunat and Allison Tong
- Subjects
long-term outcome ,Clinical Trials as Topic ,Transplantation ,Science & Technology ,IMMUNOSUPPRESSION ,EMA guideline ,kidney transplantation outcome ,European Society for Organ Transplantation ,risk stratification ,Kidney Transplantation ,Risk Assessment ,Transplant Recipients ,efficacy endpoint ,improvement ,Humans ,Surgery ,Life Sciences & Biomedicine - Abstract
The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2018, to explore whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research, thereby improving long-term outcomes for allograft recipients. The request was refined collaboratively by the EMA and ESOT, with the EMA issuing a final response in December 2020. This Transplant International special issue explores the topics that were the focus of these interactions between the EMA and ESOT. Articles explore the current issues and dilemmas in kidney transplantation, primarily relating to unclear or outdated risk stratification and markers of transplantation success, although several potential improvements for outcomes assessment are also suggested. Discussions between the EMA and ESOT and recommendations are summarized, in the hope that this project will generate further discussion eventually generating a consensus on clinical trial endpoints and risk stratification, increase the quality of research in transplantation medicine, and improve long-term outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. ispartof: TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL vol:35 ispartof: location:Switzerland status: published
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
208. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Maarten Naesens, Alexandre Loupy, Luuk Hilbrands, Rainer Oberbauer, Maria Irene Bellini, Denis Glotz, Josep Grinyó, Uwe Heemann, Ina Jochmans, Liset Pengel, Marlies Reinders, Stefan Schneeberger, Klemens Budde, and Internal Medicine
- Subjects
Marketing ,Transplantation ,re-transplantation ,unmet medical need ,Health Archive ,mortality ,late graft failure ,morbidity ,clinical studies ,Kidney Transplantation ,ddc ,Humans ,Renal disorders Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 11] ,Drug Approval ,Biomarkers - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252103.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Conditional marketing authorization (CMA) facilitates timely access to new drugs for illnesses with unmet clinical needs, such as late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Late graft failure remains a serious, burdensome, and life-threatening condition for recipients. This article has been developed from content prepared by members of a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) for a Broad Scientific Advice request, submitted by ESOT to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and reviewed by the EMA in 2020. The article presents the rationale for using surrogate endpoints in clinical trials aiming at improving late graft failure rates, to enable novel kidney transplantation therapies to be considered for CMA and improve access to medicines. The paper also provides background data to illustrate the relationship between primary and surrogate endpoints. Developing surrogate endpoints and a CMA strategy could be particularly beneficial for studies where the use of primary endpoints would yield insufficient statistical power or insufficient indication of long-term benefit following transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
209. Allograft Function as Endpoint for Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Luuk Hilbrands, Klemens Budde, Maria Irene Bellini, Fritz Diekmann, Lucrezia Furian, Josep Grinyó, Uwe Heemann, Dennis A. Hesselink, Alexandre Loupy, Rainer Oberbauer, Liset Pengel, Marlies Reinders, Stefan Schneeberger, Maarten Naesens, and Internal Medicine
- Subjects
Transplantation ,urogenital system ,endpoints ,Health Archive ,kidney transplantation ,graft function ,graft dysfunction ,clinical study ,kidney transplantation, graft function, graft dysfunction, clinical study, endpoints ,urologic and male genital diseases ,Allografts ,ddc ,Disease Progression ,Albuminuria ,Humans ,Renal Insufficiency ,Glomerular Filtration Rate ,Kidney Transplantation ,Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ,Chronic ,Renal disorders Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 11] - Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252052.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Clinical study endpoints that assess the efficacy of interventions in patients with chronic renal insufficiency can be adopted for use in kidney transplantation trials, given the pathophysiological similarities between both conditions. Kidney dysfunction is reflected in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and although a predefined (e.g., 50%) reduction in GFR was recommended as an endpoint by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016, many other endpoints are also included in clinical trials. End-stage renal disease is strongly associated with a change in estimated (e)GFR, and eGFR trajectories or slopes are increasingly used as endpoints in clinical intervention trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar approaches could be considered for clinical trials in kidney transplantation, although several factors should be taken into account. The present Consensus Report was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the EMA in 2020. This paper provides a contemporary discussion of primary endpoints used in clinical trials involving CKD, including proteinuria and albuminuria, and evaluates the validity of these concepts as endpoints for clinical trials in kidney transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
210. FC 107: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Virtual Biopsy System in Kidney Transplant Patients
- Author
-
Daniel Yoo, Gillian Divard, Marc Raynaud, Maarten Naesens, Nassim Kamar, Antoine Bouquegneau, Federico Oppenheimer, Erika De Sousa, Dirk Kuypers, Antoine Durrbach, Daniel Seron Micas, Marion Rabant, Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen, Oriol Bestard, Nikolina Basic-Jukic, Ivana Jurić, Christophe Legendre, Carmen Lefaucheur, Olivier Aubert, and Alexandre Loupy
- Subjects
Transplantation ,Nephrology - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Graphical Abstract In kidney transplantation, day-zero biopsies are used to assess organ quality and discriminate lesions inherited from the donor or acquired after transplantation. However, many centres worldwide do not perform those biopsies which remain invasive, costly and may delay the transplant procedure. We aimed to develop and validate a noninvasive virtual biopsy system. METHOD A total of 17 centres were included from Europe, North America and Australia from 2000 to 2019. Candidate predictors were assessed following a prespecified protocol. Outcome measures were the day-zero biopsy lesions (Banff classification) including CV, AH, IFTA scores and % of sclerotic glomeruli. Six machine learning models were developed and their performances were assessed. RESULTS A total of 12 992 day-zero biopsies were included. Eleven parameters were used to build the classifiers, including donor age, kidney function, hypertension, BMI, proteinuria, diabetes, sex, donor type, cause of death and Hep-C status. The ensemble models (random forests, neural networks, gradient boosting, extreme gradient boosting tree, linear discriminant analysis, and naive Bayes) showed multi-AUC of 0.738, 0.817 and 0.788 for prediction of CV, AH and IFTA scores, and a good performance for predicting glomerulosclerosis (mean absolute error, MAE = 4.766). We confirmed the robustness and generalizability in multiple clinical scenarios and subpopulations and built an online interface for clinicians: https://transplant-pred/Virtual_Biopsy. CONCLUSION We developed and validated the first virtual biopsy system that enables the prediction of day-zero biopsy, based on routinely collected parameters. This can assist clinicians in assessing allograft quality, discrimination of donor derived versus acquired lesions after transplantation and prevent overdiagnosis of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity.
- Published
- 2022
211. FC 105: Multidimensional Prognostication Tool for Kidney Transplant Patient Survival: The Mortality Mbox
- Author
-
Charlotte Debiais-Deschamps, Olivier Aubert, Daniel Yoo, Gillian Divard, Christophe Legendre, and Alexandre Loupy
- Subjects
Transplantation ,Nephrology - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Predicting kidney transplant patient mortality has been hampered by registry-based studies and low-level phenotyped cohorts without specific design towards mortality prediction. This represents a limitation for decision making and ultimately patient care. We aimed to build a robust patient mortality prognostication system. METHOD We enrolled 1446 patients transplanted in France between 2004 and 2014 in whom a protocol-based collection including more than 160 parameters from the recipient (past medical history, risk factors) donor and graft, biological and imaging data, was performed on the day of transplantation (TX) and during the first year of transplantation. Multivariable Cox model was used to develop an individual predictive score of mortality, further improved by a Lasso regression in order to retain the strongest predictors of mortality. RESULTS Among the 1446 kidney transplant recipients included, 309 patients died after a median post-TX follow-up time of 7.6 years (IQR 5.40–10.78). Among the 120 parameters, 19 predictors were selected using lasso regression. The strongest predictors of patient survival were (1) baseline recipient factors (age, history of cancer, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular events: myocardial infarction, stroke or arteritis, supraventricular cardiac rhythm disorder, psychiatric history and VHC status); (2) post-TX parameters (need for dialysis, cardiovascular complications and cancer in the first year of TX); and (3) seven biological variables (HbA1c, C-reactive protein, albumin, gamma-glutamyl transferase, uric acid, neutrophils and urinary protein). The mortality score showed accurate calibration and discrimination at 10 years [C-statistic = 0.81; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.78–0.83]. CONCLUSION We generate the first integrative patient survival score that shows a superior prediction performance when compared to previous prognostic systems, reaching 81% prediction accuracy at 10 years. A reliable survival prediction tool will enable improved patient monitoring and therapeutic decision making to alter the course of an unfavorable patient survival outcome and may provide a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials.
- Published
- 2022
212. MO1021: Long-Term Outcomes After Conversion to a Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant: A Matched Cohort Study
- Author
-
Gillian Divard, Charlotte Debiais-Deschamps, Christophe Legendre, Carmen Lefaucheur, Olivier Aubert, and Alexandre Loupy
- Subjects
Transplantation ,Nephrology - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Conversion to a belatacept regimen after transplant seems to be safe. However, no studies have reported the long-term efficacy and safety outcomes after conversion to a belatacept regimen and compared it with patients treated with a CNI-based regimen in kidney transplantation. This study aims to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients converted to a belatacept regimen compared with matched patients under a CNI regimen. METHOD Kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 1998 and 2019 from two French academic transplant canters were recruited. We used a propensity score to match with a 1:1 ratio of patients at the time of the biopsy, which indicates the conversion to a belatacept regimen to control patients under a CNI regimen with a biopsy after transplant. We used 11 parameters associated with graft survival for the matching, 4 baseline transplant characteristics (recipient age, prior transplant status, donor type and dgf) and 7 at time of the biopsy (time after transplant, eGFR, proteinuria, DSA and Banff scores cv, ah, IFTA). Transplant outcomes defined by graft and patient survival, as well as safety outcomes, were compared between the matched patients. RESULTS From 3215 kidney transplant recipients transplanted during the study period with the inclusion criteria (311 patients under belatacept and 2904 patients under CNI). A total of 243 patients under belatacept were matched with 243 controls under CNI. All prognostic parameters were well-balanced before conversion between the two groups, with a mean age of 54.7 ± 15.1 years (P = .4543), a mean time of 2.2 ± 3.2 years after transplant (P = .586), a mean eGFR of 33.0 ± 13.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = .976), a median proteinuria of 0.23 (0.12–0.50) g/g (P = .278) and 30.9% of positive anti-HLA DSA (P = 1.0) in the belatacept group. After a mean follow-up time after conversion of 4.4 ± 2.5 years, 36 (14.8%) patients lost their grafts and 39 (16.0%) patients died in the belatacept cohort. After conversion to a belatacept regimen, the graft survival was significantly improved when we compared with the matched patients’ under CNI P < .0001 (Fig. 1). Patients converted to Belatacept showed a lower death rate of 16.0% compared with 30.0% for the CNI treated patients (P < .001). The safety outcomes showed a similar rate of biopsy proven rejection (P = .08), major adverse cardiovascular events and cancer between the two groups, while a significant higher rate of CMV disease was observed among the belatacept treated patients P < .01). CONCLUSION This study confirms that conversion to belatacept post-transplant is associated with improved long-term graft outcome and acceptable safety. Conversion to belatacept after transplant should be considered as a valuable therapeutic option for kidney recipients.
- Published
- 2022
213. FC031: Validation of a Prediction System for Risk of Allograft Loss (IBOX) in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients
- Author
-
Julien Hogan, Gillian Divard, Rouba Garro, Olivia Boyer, Michael Seifert, Jodi Smith, Burkhard Tönshoff, Katherine Twombley, Bradley Warady, Patricia Weng, Rima Zhar, Rachel Patzer, and Alexandre Loupy
- Subjects
Transplantation ,Nephrology - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Kidney allograft loss is a common cause of end-stage renal disease but accurate prediction models of kidney allograft loss are lacking in children. The iBOX system has been broadly validated among adults. We aimed to validate the iBOX system in a large international cohort of pediatric kTx recipients. METHOD In this observational study, we used data from pediatric ( RESULTS A total of 573 kTx recipients were included. Median time from transplantation to evaluation was 1.0 (0.5–2.0) year with a mean age at evaluation at 12.1 (5.5) years and mean follow-up after transplantation 5.1 (2.8) years. Five-year death-censored graft survival from evaluation was 95%. At the time of evaluation, mean eGFR and uPCR were 65.5 (29.6) mL/min/1.73 m2 and 0.25 (1.2) g/g, respectively. A total of 118 (20.6%) of the patients had DSA. The iBOX system showed good discrimination with a c-statistic of 0.81 and good calibration (Figure 1). CONCLUSION The iBOX system demonstrated high accuracy in predicting kidney allograft loss in children with performances similar to those reported in adults.
- Published
- 2022
214. FC 113: Development and Validation of an Integrative DD-CFDNA System to Predict Allograft Rejection: A Population Based Study
- Author
-
Olivier Aubert, Romain Brousse, Juliette Gueguen, Cindy Ursule-Dufait, Daniel Yoo, Dany Anglicheau, Carmen Lefaucheur, and Alexandre Loupy
- Subjects
Transplantation ,Nephrology - Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Post-transplantation patient care requires development and validation of noninvasive biomarkers to improve allograft monitoring and prevention from unnecessary biopsies. Preliminary reports have suggested the association of donor derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) with allograft rejection. However, there is no proof of its added value beyond standard of care patient management in large and deep phenotyped cohorts. METHOD A total of 1210 concomitant evaluations of allograft histology, anti-HLA DSA and functional parameters between 2013 and 2018 were included corresponding to 637 evaluations in the derivation cohort and 573 in the validation cohort. dd-cfDNA was measured in plasma at the time of the evaluation. Diagnoses were assessed using Banff 2019 criteria. Parameters associated with kidney allograft rejection were assessed using uni- and multivariable logistic regression. We developed a risk model using the variables that were independently associated with rejection. RESULTS Higher levels of dd-cfDNA were observed for AMR and TCMR or both compared to other diagnoses (Figure 1A). We found incremental dd-cfDNA levels with increasing Banff lesion scores for g, ptc, i, t, cg and C4d (Figure 1B). There was no association of dd-cfDNA levels with allograft inactive lesions. In multivariable analysis, dd-cfDNA (P CONCLUSION We demonstrate the independent and added value of dd-cfDNA in addition to conventional features to predict rejection. This first integrative system shows improved performance for patient monitoring and could help physicians in decision-making process.
- Published
- 2022
215. Cohort study: 'Outcomes of kidney transplantation in patients with prosthetic heart valves'
- Author
-
Ouahmi, Hajar, Moceri, Pamela, Zorzi, Kevin, Albano, Laetitia, Durand, Matthieu, Karimi, Fatimaezzahra, Morelon, Emmanuel, Buron, Fanny, Le Quintrec, Moglie, Pernin, Vincent, Ladriere, Marc, Girerd, Sophie, Dantal, Jacques, Loupy, Alexandre, Couzi, Lionel, Ferrari, Emile, Esnault, Vincent, Merville, Pierre, Legendre, Christophe, Giral, Magali, Sicard, Antoine, Badet, Lionel, Brunet, Maria, Cahen, Rémi, Codas, Ricardo, Daoud, Sameh, Dubois, Valérie, Fournie, Coralie, Grégoire, Arnaud, Koenig, Alice, Lévi, Charlène, Pouteil‐Noble, Claire, Rabeyrin, Maud, Rimmelé, Thomas, Thaunat, Olivier, Abdo, Nicolas, Delmas, Sylvie, Perrochia, Hélène, Serre, Jean‐Emmanuel, Szwarc, Ilan, Aarnink, Alice, Alla, Asma, Eschwege, Pascal, Frimat, Luc, Hubert, Jacques, Kormann, Raphaël, Lagrange, François, Laurain, Emmanuelle, Lecoanet, Pierre, Lemelle, Jean‐Louis, Mannuguerra, Anthony, Mazeaud, Charles, Peres, Michael, Blancho, Gilles, Branchereau, Julien, Cantarovich, Diego, Chapelet, Agnès, Deltombe, Clément, Figueres, Lucile, Garandeau, Claire, Gourraud‐Vercel, Caroline, Hourmant, Maryvonne, Karam, Georges, Kerleau, Clarisse, Meurette, Aurélie, Ville, Simon, Kandell, Christine, Moreau, Anne, Renaudin, Karine, Cesbron, Anne, Delbos, Florent, Walencik, Alexandre, Devis, Anne, Chevallier, Daniel, Tibi, Brannwel, Ahallal, Younes, Amrouche, Lucile, Anglicheau, Dany, Aubert, Olivier, Bererhi, Lynda, Martinez, Frank, Sberro‐Soussan, Rébecca, Scemla, Anne, Tinel, Claire, Zuber, Julien, Glotz, Denis, Lefaucheur, Carmen, Université Côte d'Azur - Faculté de Médecine (UCA Faculté Médecine), Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (CHU Nice), CIC CHU Lyon (inserm), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Réseau CENTAURE, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier), Cellules Souches, Plasticité Cellulaire, Médecine Régénératrice et Immunothérapies (IRMB), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Montpellier] (CHRU Montpellier)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Service de Néphrologie [CHRU Nancy], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie - Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology (U1064 Inserm - CR2TI), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Nantes Université - UFR de Médecine et des Techniques Médicales (Nantes Univ - UFR MEDECINE), Nantes Université - pôle Santé, Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université - pôle Santé, Nantes Université (Nantes Univ)-Nantes Université (Nantes Univ), CHU Bordeaux [Bordeaux], Immunology from Concept and Experiments to Translation (ImmunoConcept), Université de Bordeaux (UB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire de PhysioMédecine Moléculaire (LP2M), Université Nice Sophia Antipolis (1965 - 2019) (UNS), COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-COMUE Université Côte d'Azur (2015-2019) (COMUE UCA)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Côte d'Azur (UCA), DIVAT Consortium: Lionel Badet, Maria Brunet, Fanny Buron, Rémi Cahen, Ricardo Codas, Sameh Daoud, Valérie Dubois, Coralie Fournie, Arnaud Grégoire, Alice Koenig, Charlène Lévi, Emmanuel Morelon, Claire Pouteil-Noble, Maud Rabeyrin, Thomas Rimmelé, Olivier Thaunat, Nicolas Abdo, Sylvie Delmas, Moglie Le Quintrec, Vincent Pernin, Hélène Perrochia, Jean-Emmanuel Serre, Ilan Szwarc, Alice Aarnink, Asma Alla, Pascal Eschwege, Luc Frimat, Sophie Girerd, Jacques Hubert, Raphaël Kormann, Marc Ladriere, François Lagrange, Emmanuelle Laurain, Pierre Lecoanet, Jean-Louis Lemelle, Anthony Mannuguerra, Charles Mazeaud, Michael Peres, Gilles Blancho, Julien Branchereau, Diego Cantarovich, Agnès Chapelet, Jacques Dantal, Clément Deltombe, Lucile Figueres, Claire Garandeau, Magali Giral, Caroline Gourraud-Vercel, Maryvonne Hourmant, Georges Karam, Clarisse Kerleau, Aurélie Meurette, Simon Ville, Christine Kandell, Anne Moreau, Karine Renaudin, Anne Cesbron, Florent Delbos, Alexandre Walencik, Anne Devis, Laetitia Albano, Fatimaezzahra Karimi, Antoine Sicard, Hajar Ouahmi, Daniel Chevallier, Brannwel Tibi, Matthieu Durand, Younes Ahallal, Lucile Amrouche, Dany Anglicheau, Olivier Aubert, Lynda Bererhi, Christophe Legendre, Alexandre Loupy, Frank Martinez, Rébecca Sberro-Soussan, Anne Scemla, Claire Tinel, Julien Zuber, Denis Glotz, Carmen Lefaucheur, and Retiveau, Nolwenn
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.medical_treatment ,MESH: Heart Valves ,Postoperative Hemorrhage ,MESH: Kidney Transplantation ,Cohort Studies ,Diabetes mellitus ,Internal medicine ,Biological heart valve ,Medicine ,Endocarditis ,Humans ,Prospective Studies ,MESH: Cohort Studies ,Kidney transplantation ,Dialysis ,Retrospective Studies ,Kidney ,Transplantation ,MESH: Humans ,business.industry ,Cardiac valve replacement ,End-stage kidney disease ,MESH: Postoperative Hemorrhage ,MESH: Retrospective Studies ,medicine.disease ,Heart Valves ,Kidney Transplantation ,MESH: Prospective Studies ,[SDV.TOX] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Prosthetic heart valve ,Mechanical heart valve ,[SDV.TOX]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Toxicology ,Cohort ,Cardiology ,business ,Cohort study - Abstract
Main problem The number of kidney transplant candidates with prosthetic heart valves (PHVs) is increasing. Yet, outcomes of kidney transplantation in these patients are still unclear. This is the first report of post-transplant outcomes in patients with PHVs at time of kidney transplantation. Methods We conducted a matched cohort study among recipients from the multicentric and prospective DIVAT cohort to compare outcomes in patients with left-sided PHVs at time of transplantation and a group of recipients without PHV matched according to age, dialysis time, initial disease, pre-transplant DSA, diabetes and cardiovascular events. Results Of 23018 patients, 92 patients with PHVs were included and compared to 276 patients without PHV. Delayed graft function and post-operative bleeding occurred more frequently in patients with PHVs. Kidney graft survival was similar between groups. 5-year overall survival was 68.5 % in patients with PHV versus 87.9 % in patients without PHV (HR, 2.72[1.57-4.70], p=0.0004). Deaths from infection, endocarditis and bleeding were more frequent in patients with PHV. Mechanical valves, but not bioprosthetic valves, were independent risk factors for mortality (HR, 2.89[1.68-4.97], p=0.0001). Conclusions Patients with PHV have high mortality rates after kidney transplantation. These data suggest that mechanical valves, but not biological valves, increase risks of post-transplant mortality.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
216. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Roufosse, Candice, primary, Becker, Jan Ulrich, additional, Rabant, Marion, additional, Seron, Daniel, additional, Bellini, Maria Irene, additional, Böhmig, Georg A., additional, Budde, Klemens, additional, Diekmann, Fritz, additional, Glotz, Denis, additional, Hilbrands, Luuk, additional, Loupy, Alexandre, additional, Oberbauer, Rainer, additional, Pengel, Liset, additional, Schneeberger, Stefan, additional, and Naesens, Maarten, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
217. Allograft Function as Endpoint for Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Hilbrands, Luuk, primary, Budde, Klemens, additional, Bellini, Maria Irene, additional, Diekmann, Fritz, additional, Furian, Lucrezia, additional, Grinyó, Josep, additional, Heemann, Uwe, additional, Hesselink, Dennis A., additional, Loupy, Alexandre, additional, Oberbauer, Rainer, additional, Pengel, Liset, additional, Reinders, Marlies, additional, Schneeberger, Stefan, additional, and Naesens, Maarten, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
218. Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Seron, Daniel, primary, Rabant, Marion, additional, Becker, Jan Ulrich, additional, Roufosse, Candice, additional, Bellini, Maria Irene, additional, Böhmig, Georg A., additional, Budde, Klemens, additional, Diekmann, Fritz, additional, Glotz, Denis, additional, Hilbrands, Luuk, additional, Loupy, Alexandre, additional, Oberbauer, Rainer, additional, Pengel, Liset, additional, Schneeberger, Stefan, additional, and Naesens, Maarten, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
219. Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure
- Author
-
Naesens, Maarten, primary, Budde, Klemens, additional, Hilbrands, Luuk, additional, Oberbauer, Rainer, additional, Bellini, Maria Irene, additional, Glotz, Denis, additional, Grinyó, Josep, additional, Heemann, Uwe, additional, Jochmans, Ina, additional, Pengel, Liset, additional, Reinders, Marlies, additional, Schneeberger, Stefan, additional, and Loupy, Alexandre, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
220. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Naesens, Maarten, primary, Loupy, Alexandre, additional, Hilbrands, Luuk, additional, Oberbauer, Rainer, additional, Bellini, Maria Irene, additional, Glotz, Denis, additional, Grinyó, Josep, additional, Heemann, Uwe, additional, Jochmans, Ina, additional, Pengel, Liset, additional, Reinders, Marlies, additional, Schneeberger, Stefan, additional, and Budde, Klemens, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
221. FC 107: Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Virtual Biopsy System in Kidney Transplant Patients
- Author
-
Yoo, Daniel, primary, Divard, Gillian, additional, Raynaud, Marc, additional, Naesens, Maarten, additional, Kamar, Nassim, additional, Bouquegneau, Antoine, additional, Oppenheimer, Federico, additional, De Sousa, Erika, additional, Kuypers, Dirk, additional, Durrbach, Antoine, additional, Seron Micas, Daniel, additional, Rabant, Marion, additional, Duong Van Huyen, Jean-Paul, additional, Bestard, Oriol, additional, Basic-Jukic, Nikolina, additional, Jurić, Ivana, additional, Legendre, Christophe, additional, Lefaucheur, Carmen, additional, Aubert, Olivier, additional, and Loupy, Alexandre, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
222. MO1021: Long-Term Outcomes After Conversion to a Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant: A Matched Cohort Study
- Author
-
Divard, Gillian, primary, Debiais-Deschamps, Charlotte, additional, Legendre, Christophe, additional, Lefaucheur, Carmen, additional, Aubert, Olivier, additional, and Loupy, Alexandre, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
223. FC 105: Multidimensional Prognostication Tool for Kidney Transplant Patient Survival: The Mortality Mbox
- Author
-
Debiais-Deschamps, Charlotte, primary, Aubert, Olivier, additional, Yoo, Daniel, additional, Divard, Gillian, additional, Legendre, Christophe, additional, and Loupy, Alexandre, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
224. FC 113: Development and Validation of an Integrative DD-CFDNA System to Predict Allograft Rejection: A Population Based Study
- Author
-
Aubert, Olivier, primary, Brousse, Romain, additional, Gueguen, Juliette, additional, Ursule-Dufait, Cindy, additional, Yoo, Daniel, additional, Anglicheau, Dany, additional, Lefaucheur, Carmen, additional, and Loupy, Alexandre, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
225. FC031: Validation of a Prediction System for Risk of Allograft Loss (IBOX) in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients
- Author
-
Hogan, Julien, primary, Divard, Gillian, additional, Garro, Rouba, additional, Boyer, Olivia, additional, Seifert, Michael, additional, Smith, Jodi, additional, Tönshoff, Burkhard, additional, Twombley, Katherine, additional, Warady, Bradley, additional, Weng, Patricia, additional, Zhar, Rima, additional, Patzer, Rachel, additional, and Loupy, Alexandre, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
226. Pathologic classification of antibody-mediated rejection correlates with donor-specific antibodies and endothelial cell activation
- Author
-
Tible, Marion, Loupy, Alexandre, Vernerey, Dewi, Suberbielle, Caroline, Beuscart, Thibaut, Cazes, Aurelie, Guillemain, Romain, Amrein, Catherine, Pezzella, Veronique, Fabiani, Jean-Noel, Nochy, Dominique, Hill, Gary, Empana, Jean-Philippe, Jouven, Xavier, Charron, Dominique, Bruneval, Patrick, and Duong Van Huyen, Jean-Paul
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
227. Molecular Diagnosis of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Human Kidney Transplants
- Author
-
Sellarés, J., Reeve, J., Loupy, A., Mengel, M., Sis, B., Skene, A., de Freitas, D.G., Kreepala, C., Hidalgo, L.G., Famulski, K.S., and Halloran, P.F.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
228. (999) Validation of the Clinical Utility of MicroRNA as Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Cardiac Allograft Rejection Monitoring: A Prospective Longitudinal Multicenter Study
- Author
-
G. Coutance, F. Tacafred, M. Racape, R. Dorent, P. Battistella, R. Guillemain, K. Blanchart, E. Epailly, A. Gay, S. Pattier, A. Boignard, E. Vermes, X. Jouven, A. Loupy, and J. Duong-Van-Huyen
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Transplantation ,Surgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Published
- 2023
229. (358) Banff Human Organ Transplant Consensus Gene Panel for Detecting Antibody Mediated Rejection in Heart Allograft Biopsies
- Author
-
A. Giarraputo, G. Coutance, D. Zielinski, O. Aubert, M. Fedrigo, F. Mezine, M. Mengel, J. Duong-Van-Huyen, P. Bruneval, A. Angelini, and A. Loupy
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Transplantation ,Surgery ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Published
- 2023
230. Peut-on trouver la taille de contexte optimale en désambiguïsation sémantique?
- Author
-
Eric Crestan, Marc El-Bèze, and Claude de Loupy
- Published
- 2003
231. Évaluation des taux de synonymie et de polysémie dans un texte.
- Author
-
Claude de Loupy
- Published
- 2002
232. Comparing the effects of two different strains of mycobacteria, Mycobacterium vaccae NCTC 11659 and M. vaccae ATCC 15483, on stress-resilient behaviors and lipid-immune signaling in rats
- Author
-
Brandon M. Marquart, Mathew R. Arnold, Noah Fierer, Kristin E. Cler, Laura K. Fonken, Steven F. Maier, Kelsey M. Loupy, Cristian A. Zambrano, Ahmed I. Elsayed, Tumim W. Yifru, Heather M. D'Angelo, Matthew G. Frank, Christopher A. Lowry, and Matthew J. Gebert
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Immunology ,Inflammation ,Anxiety ,Hippocampal formation ,Article ,Mycobacterium ,Flow cytometry ,Microbiology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Behavioral Neuroscience ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,Animals ,Secretion ,Interleukin 6 ,Mycobacteriaceae ,Interleukin 4 ,biology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Endocrine and Autonomic Systems ,FOXP3 ,biology.organism_classification ,Lipids ,Rats ,030104 developmental biology ,biology.protein ,Mycobacterium vaccae ,medicine.symptom ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Stress-related disorders, such as posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), are highly prevalent and often difficult to treat. In rodents, stress-related, anxiety-like defensive behavioral responses may be characterized by social avoidance, exacerbated inflammation, and altered metabolic states. We have previously shown that, in rodents, subcutaneous injections of a heat-killed preparation of the soil-derived bacterium Mycobacterium vaccae NCTC 11659 promotes stress resilience effects that are associated with immunoregulatory signaling in the periphery and the brain. In the current study, we sought to determine whether treatment with a heat-killed preparation of the closely related M. vaccae type strain, M. vaccae ATCC 15483, would also promote stress-resilience in adult male rats, likely due to biologically similar characteristics of the two strains. Here we show that immunization with either M. vaccae NCTC 11659 or M. vaccae ATCC 15483 prevents stress-induced increases in hippocampal interleukin 6 mRNA expression, consistent with previous studies showing that M. vaccae NCTC 11659 prevents stress-induced increases in peripheral IL-6 secretion, and prevents exaggeration of anxiety-like defensive behavioral responses assessed 24 h after exposure to inescapable tail shock stress (IS) in adult male rats. Analysis of mRNA expression, protein abundance, and flow cytometry data demonstrate overlapping but also unique effects of treatment with the two M. vaccae strains on immunological and metabolic signaling in the host. These data support the hypothesis that treatment with different M. vaccae strains may immunize the host against stress-induced dysregulation of physiology and behavior.
- Published
- 2021
233. Improving WSD with Multi-Level View of Context Monitored by Similarity Measure.
- Author
-
Eric Crestan, Marc El-Bèze, and Claude de Loupy
- Published
- 2001
234. Data-Driven Chronic Allograft Phenotypes: A Novel and Validated Complement for Histologic Assessment of Kidney Transplant Biopsies
- Author
-
Thibaut Vaulet, Gillian Divard, Olivier Thaunat, Priyanka Koshy, Evelyne Lerut, Aleksandar Senev, Olivier Aubert, Elisabet Van Loon, Jasper Callemeyn, Marie-Paule Emonds, Amaryllis Van Craenenbroeck, Katrien De Vusser, Ben Sprangers, Maud Rabeyrin, Valérie Dubois, Dirk Kuypers, Maarten De Vos, Alexandre Loupy, Bart De Moor, and Maarten Naesens
- Subjects
Graft Rejection ,phenotyping ,consensus clustering ,Biopsy ,Graft Survival ,kidney transplantation ,General Medicine ,Complement System Proteins ,chronic allograft rejection ,Kidney ,Allografts ,Kidney Transplantation ,machine learning ,Phenotype ,Nephrology ,Banff classification ,Humans ,biopsy ,Kidney Diseases - Abstract
BACKGROUND: No validated system currently exists to realistically characterize the chronic pathology of kidney transplants that represents the dynamic disease process and spectrum of disease severity. We sought to develop and validate a tool to describe chronicity and severity of renal allograft disease and integrate it with the evaluation of disease activity. METHODS: The training cohort included 3549 kidney transplant biopsies from an observational cohort of 937 recipients. We reweighted the chronic histologic lesions according to their time-dependent association with graft failure, and performed consensus k-means clustering analysis. Total chronicity was calculated as the sum of the weighted chronic lesion scores, scaled to the unit interval. RESULTS: We identified four chronic clusters associated with graft outcome, based on the proportion of ambiguous clustering. The two clusters with the worst survival outcome were determined by interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) and by transplant glomerulopathy. The chronic clusters partially overlapped with the existing Banff IFTA classification (adjusted Rand index, 0.35) and were distributed independently of the acute lesions. Total chronicity strongly associated with graft failure (hazard ratio [HR], 8.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.94 to 10.88; P
- Published
- 2022
235. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Roufosse, C., Becker, J.U., Rabant, M., Seron, D., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., Naesens, M., Roufosse, C., Becker, J.U., Rabant, M., Seron, D., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., and Naesens, M.
- Abstract
Item does not contain fulltext, Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores ≥2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of >10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.
- Published
- 2022
236. Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure
- Author
-
Naesens, M., Budde, K., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., Loupy, A., Naesens, M., Budde, K., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., and Loupy, A.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252106.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), In kidney transplant recipients, late graft failure is often multifactorial. In addition, primary endpoints in kidney transplantation studies seek to demonstrate the short-term efficacy and safety of clinical interventions. Although such endpoints might demonstrate short-term improvement in specific aspects of graft function or incidence of rejection, such findings do not automatically translate into meaningful long-term graft survival benefits. Combining many factors into a well-validated model is therefore more likely to predict long-term outcome and better reflect the complexity of late graft failure than using single endpoints. If conditional marketing authorization could be considered for therapies that aim to improve long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation, then the surrogate endpoint for graft failure in clinical trial settings needs clearer definition. This Consensus Report considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of several candidate surrogate endpoints (including estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, histological lesions, and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies) and composite scoring systems. The content was created from information prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The group submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), June 2020: the request focused on clinical trial design and endpoints in kidney transplantation. Following discussion and refinement, the EMA made final recommendations to ESOT in December 2020 regarding the potential to use surrogate endpoints in clinical studies that aim to improving late graft failure.
- Published
- 2022
237. Allograft Function as Endpoint for Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Hilbrands, L.B., Budde, K., Bellini, M.I., Diekmann, F., Furian, L., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Hesselink, D.A., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., Naesens, M., Hilbrands, L.B., Budde, K., Bellini, M.I., Diekmann, F., Furian, L., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Hesselink, D.A., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., and Naesens, M.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252052.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), Clinical study endpoints that assess the efficacy of interventions in patients with chronic renal insufficiency can be adopted for use in kidney transplantation trials, given the pathophysiological similarities between both conditions. Kidney dysfunction is reflected in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and although a predefined (e.g., 50%) reduction in GFR was recommended as an endpoint by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016, many other endpoints are also included in clinical trials. End-stage renal disease is strongly associated with a change in estimated (e)GFR, and eGFR trajectories or slopes are increasingly used as endpoints in clinical intervention trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar approaches could be considered for clinical trials in kidney transplantation, although several factors should be taken into account. The present Consensus Report was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the EMA in 2020. This paper provides a contemporary discussion of primary endpoints used in clinical trials involving CKD, including proteinuria and albuminuria, and evaluates the validity of these concepts as endpoints for clinical trials in kidney transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
238. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Naesens, M., Loupy, A., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., Budde, K., Naesens, M., Loupy, A., Hilbrands, L.B., Oberbauer, R., Bellini, M.I., Glotz, D., Grinyó, J., Heemann, U., Jochmans, I., Pengel, L., Reinders, M., Schneeberger, S., and Budde, K.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252103.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), Conditional marketing authorization (CMA) facilitates timely access to new drugs for illnesses with unmet clinical needs, such as late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Late graft failure remains a serious, burdensome, and life-threatening condition for recipients. This article has been developed from content prepared by members of a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) for a Broad Scientific Advice request, submitted by ESOT to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and reviewed by the EMA in 2020. The article presents the rationale for using surrogate endpoints in clinical trials aiming at improving late graft failure rates, to enable novel kidney transplantation therapies to be considered for CMA and improve access to medicines. The paper also provides background data to illustrate the relationship between primary and surrogate endpoints. Developing surrogate endpoints and a CMA strategy could be particularly beneficial for studies where the use of primary endpoints would yield insufficient statistical power or insufficient indication of long-term benefit following transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
239. Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Seron, D., Rabant, M., Becker, J.U., Roufosse, C., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., Naesens, M., Seron, D., Rabant, M., Becker, J.U., Roufosse, C., Bellini, M.I., Böhmig, G.A., Budde, K., Diekmann, F., Glotz, D., Hilbrands, L.B., Loupy, A., Oberbauer, R., Pengel, L., Schneeberger, S., and Naesens, M.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 252101.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability-and ambiguity-in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
240. Proposed Definitions of T Cell-Mediated Rejection and Tubulointerstitial Inflammation as Clinical Trial Endpoints in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Seron, Daniel, Rabant, Marion, Becker, Jan Ulrich, Roufosse, Candice, Bellini, Maria Irene, Boehmig, Georg A., Budde, Klemens, Diekmann, Fritz, Glotz, Denis, Hilbrands, Luuk, Loupy, Alexandre, Oberbauer, Rainer, Pengel, Liset, Schneeberger, Stefan, Naesens, Maarten, Seron, Daniel, Rabant, Marion, Becker, Jan Ulrich, Roufosse, Candice, Bellini, Maria Irene, Boehmig, Georg A., Budde, Klemens, Diekmann, Fritz, Glotz, Denis, Hilbrands, Luuk, Loupy, Alexandre, Oberbauer, Rainer, Pengel, Liset, Schneeberger, Stefan, and Naesens, Maarten
- Abstract
The diagnosis of acute T cell-mediated rejection (aTCMR) after kidney transplantation has considerable relevance for research purposes. Its definition is primarily based on tubulointerstitial inflammation and has changed little over time; aTCMR is therefore a suitable parameter for longitudinal data comparisons. In addition, because aTCMR is managed with antirejection therapies that carry additional risks, anxieties, and costs, it is a clinically meaningful endpoint for studies. This paper reviews the history and classifications of TCMR and characterizes its potential role in clinical trials: a role that largely depends on the nature of the biopsy taken (indication vs protocol), the level of inflammation observed (e.g., borderline changes vs full TCMR), concomitant chronic lesions (chronic active TCMR), and the therapeutic intervention planned. There is ongoing variability-and ambiguity-in clinical monitoring and management of TCMR. More research, to investigate the clinical relevance of borderline changes (especially in protocol biopsies) and effective therapeutic strategies that improve graft survival rates with minimal patient morbidity, is urgently required. The present paper was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the European Medicines Agency for discussion in 2020. This paper proposes to move toward refined definitions of aTCMR and borderline changes to be included as primary endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
241. Proposed Definitions of Antibody-Mediated Rejection for Use as a Clinical Trial Endpoint in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Roufosse, Candice, Becker, Jan Ulrich, Rabant, Marion, Seron, Daniel, Bellini, Maria Irene, Boehmig, Georg A., Budde, Klemens, Diekmann, Fritz, Glotz, Denis, Hilbrands, Luuk, Loupy, Alexandre, Oberbauer, Rainer, Pengel, Liset, Schneeberger, Stefan, Naesens, Maarten, Roufosse, Candice, Becker, Jan Ulrich, Rabant, Marion, Seron, Daniel, Bellini, Maria Irene, Boehmig, Georg A., Budde, Klemens, Diekmann, Fritz, Glotz, Denis, Hilbrands, Luuk, Loupy, Alexandre, Oberbauer, Rainer, Pengel, Liset, Schneeberger, Stefan, and Naesens, Maarten
- Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is caused by antibodies that recognize donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) or other targets. As knowledge of AMR pathophysiology has increased, a combination of factors is necessary to confirm the diagnosis and phenotype. However, frequent modifications to the AMR definition have made it difficult to compare data and evaluate associations between AMR and graft outcome. The present paper was developed following a Broad Scientific Advice request from the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which explored whether updating guidelines on clinical trial endpoints would encourage innovations in kidney transplantation research. ESOT considers that an AMR diagnosis must be based on a combination of histopathological factors and presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies in the recipient. Evidence for associations between individual features of AMR and impaired graft outcome is noted for microvascular inflammation scores >= 2 and glomerular basement membrane splitting of > 10% of the entire tuft in the most severely affected glomerulus. Together, these should form the basis for AMR-related endpoints in clinical trials of kidney transplantation, although modifications and restrictions to the Banff diagnostic definition of AMR are proposed for this purpose. The EMA provided recommendations based on this Broad Scientific Advice request in December 2020; further discussion, and consensus on the restricted definition of the AMR endpoint, is required.
- Published
- 2022
242. Rationale for Surrogate Endpoints and Conditional Marketing Authorization of New Therapies for Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Naesens, Maarten, Loupy, Alexandre, Hilbrands, Luuk, Oberbauer, Rainer, Bellini, Maria Irene, Glotz, Denis, Grinyó, Josep, Heemann, Uwe, Jochmans, Ina, Pengel, Liset, Reinders, Marlies, Schneeberger, Stefan, Budde, Klemens, Naesens, Maarten, Loupy, Alexandre, Hilbrands, Luuk, Oberbauer, Rainer, Bellini, Maria Irene, Glotz, Denis, Grinyó, Josep, Heemann, Uwe, Jochmans, Ina, Pengel, Liset, Reinders, Marlies, Schneeberger, Stefan, and Budde, Klemens
- Abstract
Conditional marketing authorization (CMA) facilitates timely access to new drugs for illnesses with unmet clinical needs, such as late graft failure after kidney transplantation. Late graft failure remains a serious, burdensome, and life-threatening condition for recipients. This article has been developed from content prepared by members of a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) for a Broad Scientific Advice request, submitted by ESOT to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and reviewed by the EMA in 2020. The article presents the rationale for using surrogate endpoints in clinical trials aiming at improving late graft failure rates, to enable novel kidney transplantation therapies to be considered for CMA and improve access to medicines. The paper also provides background data to illustrate the relationship between primary and surrogate endpoints. Developing surrogate endpoints and a CMA strategy could be particularly beneficial for studies where the use of primary endpoints would yield insufficient statistical power or insufficient indication of long-term benefit following transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
243. Allograft Function as Endpoint for Clinical Trials in Kidney Transplantation
- Author
-
Hilbrands, Luuk, Budde, Klemens, Bellini, Maria Irene, Diekmann, Fritz, Furian, Lucrezia, Grinyó, Josep, Heemann, Uwe, Hesselink, Dennis A, Loupy, Alexandre, Oberbauer, Rainer, Pengel, Liset, Reinders, Marlies, Schneeberger, Stefan, Naesens, Maarten, Hilbrands, Luuk, Budde, Klemens, Bellini, Maria Irene, Diekmann, Fritz, Furian, Lucrezia, Grinyó, Josep, Heemann, Uwe, Hesselink, Dennis A, Loupy, Alexandre, Oberbauer, Rainer, Pengel, Liset, Reinders, Marlies, Schneeberger, Stefan, and Naesens, Maarten
- Abstract
Clinical study endpoints that assess the efficacy of interventions in patients with chronic renal insufficiency can be adopted for use in kidney transplantation trials, given the pathophysiological similarities between both conditions. Kidney dysfunction is reflected in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and although a predefined (e.g., 50%) reduction in GFR was recommended as an endpoint by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2016, many other endpoints are also included in clinical trials. End-stage renal disease is strongly associated with a change in estimated (e)GFR, and eGFR trajectories or slopes are increasingly used as endpoints in clinical intervention trials in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Similar approaches could be considered for clinical trials in kidney transplantation, although several factors should be taken into account. The present Consensus Report was developed from documentation produced by the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) as part of a Broad Scientific Advice request that ESOT submitted to the EMA in 2020. This paper provides a contemporary discussion of primary endpoints used in clinical trials involving CKD, including proteinuria and albuminuria, and evaluates the validity of these concepts as endpoints for clinical trials in kidney transplantation.
- Published
- 2022
244. Surrogate Endpoints for Late Kidney Transplantation Failure
- Author
-
Naesens, Maarten, Budde, Klemens, Hilbrands, Luuk, Oberbauer, Rainer, Bellini, Maria Irene, Glotz, Denis, Grinyó, Josep, Heemann, Uwe, Jochmans, Ina, Pengel, Liset, Reinders, Marlies, Schneeberger, Stefan, Loupy, Alexandre, Naesens, Maarten, Budde, Klemens, Hilbrands, Luuk, Oberbauer, Rainer, Bellini, Maria Irene, Glotz, Denis, Grinyó, Josep, Heemann, Uwe, Jochmans, Ina, Pengel, Liset, Reinders, Marlies, Schneeberger, Stefan, and Loupy, Alexandre
- Abstract
In kidney transplant recipients, late graft failure is often multifactorial. In addition, primary endpoints in kidney transplantation studies seek to demonstrate the short-term efficacy and safety of clinical interventions. Although such endpoints might demonstrate short-term improvement in specific aspects of graft function or incidence of rejection, such findings do not automatically translate into meaningful long-term graft survival benefits. Combining many factors into a well-validated model is therefore more likely to predict long-term outcome and better reflect the complexity of late graft failure than using single endpoints. If conditional marketing authorization could be considered for therapies that aim to improve long-term outcomes following kidney transplantation, then the surrogate endpoint for graft failure in clinical trial settings needs clearer definition. This Consensus Report considers the potential benefits and drawbacks of several candidate surrogate endpoints (including estimated glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, histological lesions, and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies) and composite scoring systems. The content was created from information prepared by a working group within the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). The group submitted a Broad Scientific Advice request to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), June 2020: the request focused on clinical trial design and endpoints in kidney transplantation. Following discussion and refinement, the EMA made final recommendations to ESOT in December 2020 regarding the potential to use surrogate endpoints in clinical studies that aim to improving late graft failure.
- Published
- 2022
245. Long-term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Patients With High Levels of Preformed DSA: The Necker High-Risk Transplant Program
- Author
-
Amrouche, Lucile, Aubert, Olivier, Suberbielle, Caroline, Rabant, Marion, Van Huyen, Jean-Paul Duong, Martinez, Frank, Sberro-Soussan, Rebecca, Scemla, Anne, Tinel, Claire, Snanoudj, Renaud, Zuber, Julien, Cavalcanti, Ruy, Timsit, Marc-Olivier, Lamhaut, Lionel, Anglicheau, Dany, Loupy, Alexandre, and Legendre, Christophe
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
246. Antibody-Mediated Rejection Due to Preexisting versus De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies in Kidney Allograft Recipients
- Author
-
Aubert, Olivier, Loupy, Alexandre, Hidalgo, Luis, Duong van Huyen, Jean-Paul, Higgins, Sarah, Viglietti, Denis, Jouven, Xavier, Glotz, Denis, Legendre, Christophe, Lefaucheur, Carmen, and Halloran, Philip F.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
247. Gene Expression Profiling for the Identification and Classification of Antibody-Mediated Heart Rejection
- Author
-
Loupy, Alexandre, Duong Van Huyen, Jean Paul, Hidalgo, Luis, Reeve, Jeff, Racapé, Maud, Aubert, Olivier, Venner, Jeffery M., Falmuski, Konrad, Bories, Marie Cécile, Beuscart, Thibaut, Guillemain, Romain, François, Arnaud, Pattier, Sabine, Toquet, Claire, Gay, Arnaud, Rouvier, Philippe, Varnous, Shaida, Leprince, Pascal, Empana, Jean Philippe, Lefaucheur, Carmen, Bruneval, Patrick, Jouven, Xavier, and Halloran, Philip F.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
248. Value of Donor–Specific Anti–HLA Antibody Monitoring and Characterization for Risk Stratification of Kidney Allograft Loss
- Author
-
Viglietti, Denis, Loupy, Alexandre, Vernerey, Dewi, Bentlejewski, Carol, Gosset, Clément, Aubert, Olivier, Duong van Huyen, Jean-Paul, Jouven, Xavier, Legendre, Christophe, Glotz, Denis, Zeevi, Adriana, and Lefaucheur, Carmen
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
249. Advancing Transplantation: New Questions, New Possibilities in Kidney and Liver Transplantation
- Author
-
Wadström, Jonas, Ericzon, Bo-Göran, Halloran, Philip F., Bechstein, Wolf O., Opelz, Gerhard, Serón, Daniel, Grinyó, Josep, Loupy, Alexandre, Kuypers, Dirk, Mariat, Christophe, Clancy, Marc, Jardine, Alan G., Guirado, Lluís, Fellström, Bengt, O’Grady, John, Pirenne, Jacques, O’Leary, Jacqueline G., Aluvihare, Varuna, Trunečka, Pavel, Baccarani, Umberto, Neuberger, James, Soto-Gutierrez, Alejandro, Geissler, Edward K., Metzger, Monty, and Gray, Muir
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
250. Solvent-free Reactions
- Author
-
Loupy, André, de Meijere, Armin, editor, Houk, K. N., editor, Kessler, Horst, editor, Lehn, Jean-Marie, editor, Ley, Steven V., editor, Schreiber, Stuart L., editor, Thiem, Joachim, editor, Trost, Barry M., editor, Vögtle, Fritz, editor, Yamamoto, Hisashi, editor, and Knochel, Paul, editor
- Published
- 1999
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.