151. Contribution of energy storage to the transition from net zero to zero energy buildings
- Author
-
Ciril Arkar, Sašo Medved, and Suzana Domjan
- Subjects
020209 energy ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Cold storage ,building-integrated photovoltaics ,energijska avtonomija stavb ,02 engineering and technology ,Thermal energy storage ,letni faktor izkoriščenosti ,Energy storage ,021105 building & construction ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,building energy autonomy ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Process engineering ,Civil and Structural Engineering ,Energy carrier ,Range (particle radiation) ,Zero-energy building ,business.industry ,Mechanical Engineering ,zero energy building ,delež ujemanja proizvodnje ,udc:620.9:502.12(045) ,Building and Construction ,nič energijske stavbe ,Environmental science ,Building-integrated photovoltaics ,business ,integrirani PV moduli ,production matching fraction ,annual utilization factor ,Efficient energy use - Abstract
Recently, intensive technological development in the field of energy efficiency of buildings has occurred, which should enable the transition from nearly zero (nZEB), through net zero (NZEB) to ultimate zero energy buildings (ZEB). The last stage will also require a transition from the grid to onsite storage of each energy carrier needed for the operation of building technical systems (BTS). In the article, the method of optimization of energy storage is presented and demonstrated on the example of all-glass NZEB office buildings in different climates. The impact of energy storage was estimated by production matching fraction fpr,match and by the building autonomy factor (AUT). The metrics were determined by dynamic modelling of buildings with south-facing glazed BIPV facades. It was found that optimum energy storage capacities are in the range between 0.01 and 0.06 kWh/m2 for heat storage, 0.03 to 0.08 kWh/m2 for cold storage and 0.03 to 0.04 kWh/m2 for batteries per 1 m2 of useful area of the building. By integrating optimized energy storage in BTS, the fpr,match could be increased from 43% to 61% and AUT from 44% to 54%, indicating that energy storage significantly contributes to the transition of NZEB towards ZEB.
- Published
- 2021