Search

Background: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in the current era has gained widespread acceptance as the modality of choice for the treatment of complicated aortic dissection (AD). However, reports on clinical results of TEVAR treatment of AD patients are mainly comparisons and analyses of results between patients in the acute and chronic phases, few reports have described the postoperative aortic remodelling of patients with subacute AD after TEVAR. The aim of this study was to investigate aortic remodelling after TEVAR in acute and subacute Stanford type B AD patients., Methods: The clinical data of 38 Stanford type B AD patients who received TEVAR treatment in our hospital between July 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively analysed. The maximum diameters of the aorta, the mean diameters of the true lumens (TLs) and the false lumens (FLs) of the aorta in the dissection range before and after TEVAR treatment were measured. All diameters between different groups or in the same group before and after therapy were compared using nonparametric tests. Count data were examined using the χ 2 test., Results: The 38 patients were 31.0-82.0 years old with a mean age of 57.0±11.0 years, including 31 men and 7 women, with 22 patients in the acute phase and 16 patients in the subacute phase. Among the 38 patients included in this study, 7 (18.4%) patients had endoleaks after treatment. No perioperative deaths occurred. Analyses of computed tomography angiography measurement results showed that the baseline maximum diameters of the aorta, TLs and FLs before TEVAR between the acute and subacute groups were not significantly different (P=0.193, P=0.301 and P=0.067, respectively). After TEVAR treatment, the maximum diameters of the aorta and the diameters of the FLs were different between the two groups (P=0.005 and P=0.012), but the diameters of the TLs were not (P=0.069). The diameters of the TLs increased, and those of FLs decreased significantly in the acute and subacute groups after TEVAR (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001 and P=0.007, respectively); the maximum diameters of the aorta decreased significantly in the acute group (P<0.001), but they did not change obviously in the subacute group (P=0.121)., Conclusions: TEVAR offers satisfactory results for the treatment of type B AD. Acute AD may be associated with better aortic remodelling compared to subacute AD after TEVAR., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Stanford type B aortic dissection is one of the aortic catastrophes with a high mortality and morbidity that needs immediate or delayed treatment, either surgically or endovascularly. This comprehensive review article addresses the current status of open, endovascular and hybrid treatment options for type B aortic dissections with the focus on new therapeutic perspectives., Methods: Evaluation of currently available evidence based on randomized and registry data and personal experience., Results: All type B dissections require prompt medical treatment to prevent aortic rupture. Acute complicated dissections are nowadays treated by endografting to reroute blood flow into the true lumen and promote false lumen thrombosis and future aortic remodeling. In acute uncomplicated situations the position of endografting is less clear and should be further delineated; however, on the long run also in these situations endografting might be protective for future aortic catastrophes in certain patient categories. In the chronic dissection with aneurysm formation of the descending thoracic and/or thoracoabdominal aorta, especially in connective tissue disorders, open surgery offers nowadays the best immediate results with long durability. Thoracic endografting plays only a minor role in these circumstances but branched and fenestrated endografting are very promising techniques. Hybrid techniques can offer the solution for high risk patients that are not suitable for open surgery., Conclusions: Emergent thoracic endografting is the golden standard for all complicated type B dissections while uncomplicated patients with high-risk features might benefit from endovascular repair. Open surgery is limited for chronic post dissection aneurysms. Aortic surveillance is of paramount importance in all situations., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Considerable progress has been made in the management of diseases of the thoracic and abdominal aorta over the past decades, ranging from advances in open repair to the advent of minimally invasive endovascular techniques. Along with this comes an equivalent rise in imaging necessity for these patients, both in preoperative planning and postoperative surveillance. With the growing complexity and diversity of vascular procedures and techniques, it is essential to have a solid understanding of the imaging features and postoperative complications of these procedures to avoid imaging pitfalls. This review is an attempt to define the normal postoperative appearance and important complications of various open and endovascular surgical techniques of the thoracic and abdominal aorta., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

" The major goal of surgery for acute type A aortic dissection is to have an alive patient. " This motto still remains the most important directive. However, also depending onto the extent of the underlying pathology and consecutively depending onto the extent of primary surgery, there is and will be need for additional classical surgical or interventional treatment sooner or later during follow-up in a substantial number of patients having had surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. This article shall guide the interested reader through the underlying mechanisms as well as treatment options in patients with chronic type B "residual" after type A repair and shall finally suggest preventive strategies to reduce the occurrence of this pathology to a minimum., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is reported to occur in 3-12% of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) cases, but is a potentially preventable complication of TEVAR for thoracoabdominal pathologies. Although many strategies have been devised to reduce the incidence of SCI, the effectiveness of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) and left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization remains controversial., Methods: From 2012 to 2014, 162 patients underwent TEVAR at a single institution. We prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed the data of 81 patients who underwent preoperative CSFD among the 162 patients. LSA revascularization was routinely used when LSA need to be covered. Preoperative characteristics, intraoperative variables, and outcomes were analyzed., Results: The mean (SD) age of the patients was 60.6 (12.5) years, and 57 patients (70%) were male. Twenty-five patients (31%) presented with degenerative aneurysm; 48 (59%), type B dissection; 5, (6%) penetrating aortic ulcer; and 3 (4%), intramural hematoma. Thirty-six patients (44%) underwent LSA revascularization before TEVAR. Two (2.5%) of the patients who underwent preoperative CSFD had SCI, of whom one recovered ambulatory status at discharge after hypertensive therapy and another had a permanent disability. Prior abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair tended to relate to SCI (P=0.065), and preoperative aortic rupture was a significant independent risk factor of SCI (P=0.002)., Conclusions: Preemptive CSFD as an adjunctive procedure to TEVAR proved to be more effective than selective use of CSFD in other prior reports of SCI cases. Preoperative CSFD is recommended as a prophylactic procedure in patients at high risk of SCI during TEVAR., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: In patients with type A dissection, residual dissection and new distal entry tears following the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure adversely affect long-term prognosis. Management include open and endovascular repair, while clinical experience is limited. We evaluate the efficacy of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in management of residual intimal tear or distal new entry tear following FET in patients with type A aortic dissection (TAAD)., Methods: Between May 2003 and April 2013, we performed FET and total arch replacement for 1,003 patients with TAAD. Among these, 23 patients (2.3%) required TEVAR for distal new entry (n=2) or residual intimal tear (n=21) at a mean of 2.0±1.6 years after FET. Mean age was 50.1±11.5 years. Marfan syndrome was seen in 2 patients (8.7%)., Results: Procedural success was 100%. The distal landing zone was above the 11th thoracic vertebra (T11) in 86.9% (20/23). Neither death nor any paraplegia or stroke occurred early after TEVAR. Follow-up was complete in 100% averaging 2.8±1.7 years (0.3-6.4). One non-Marfan patient died of distal aortic rupture at 4 months after TEVAR. No late stroke or paraplegia occurred. Survival was 95.7% (95% CI, 72.9-99.4%) at 3 and 5 years, respectively. CTA detected false lumen obliteration by thrombus around the endograft in the descending aorta in 91.3% (21/23) of patients., Conclusions: These early and midterm outcomes show the efficacy of TEVAR in obliterating the residual intimal tear or distal new entry after FET in patients with TAAD. TEVAR may be an alternative approach to distal new entry or residual intimal tear following FET for patients with TAAD., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: Presented at the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Aortic Symposium 2016, New York, NY, USA, May 12–13, 2016.

Background: Traumatic thoracic aortic dissection is uncommon in clinical practice; however, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Thoracic aortic dissection is usually caused by sudden deceleration resulting from a traffic accident or fall. Aortic injury after blunt trauma is a critical condition. This study reported the outcomes of endovascular repair of acute traumatic aortic dissection in patients at a district general hospital., Methods: In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of eight patients with acute traumatic aortic dissection after a blunt trauma who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) between January 2012 and December 2015 at a district general hospital in Taiwan., Results: The median age of the patients was 49±22 years (range, 20-77 years), and 6 of the 8 (75%) patients were men. Five patients were involved in traffic accidents, and 3 patients had fallen from heights. The injury severity score (ISS) of the patients ranged from 17 to 66. In all patients, the aortic injury was located near the origin of the left subclavian artery (LSA). Four patients had seal ostium of subclavian artery, left. None of the patients developed paraplegia or lower extremity ischemia. Moreover, all patients had concomitant injuries, and no patients died postoperatively., Conclusions: Endovascular repair is a rapid and minimally invasive therapy for patients with traumatic aortic injury and is associated with favorable technical results.

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the durability of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in two similar clinical trials that used early- and later-generation stent grafts. Materials and Methods: Secondary procedures from the prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, clinical trial databases of the test arm of the VALOR and VALOR II trials were analyzed at 3 years. Descriptive and statistical analyses were employed to compare the rate of and potential predictors for secondary procedures. Results: A total of 127 and 96 patients were available for a minimum of 3 years of follow-up in the test arm of VALOR and VALOR II, respectively. By the first year after the index procedure, VALOR II patients were significantly less likely to have undergone a secondary procedure versus patients in the test arm of VALOR (odds ratio [OR], 0.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01–0.63; P = .02), with most procedures performed for type I endoleak. Multivariate predictors at 3 years for the need for a secondary procedure in the VALOR test arm were maximum aneurysm diameter (P = .002) and aneurysm length (P = .01), both of which remained significant at the end of the study period. The estimated freedoms from secondary procedures in the VALOR test arm and VALOR II at 3 years were 85.1% (95% CI, 78.5%–89.8%) and 94.9% (95% CI, 88.8%–97.7%), respectively (P < .001). Conclusions: The rate of secondary procedures after TEVAR differed between the two cohorts, being substantially lower in the VALOR II trial at 1 year of follow-up. This finding suggests significant benefit from advances in some combination of operator experience, imaging systems, treatment planning, and device design. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The patient described herein was a 75-year-old female. Echocardiography showed patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Heart failure symptoms gradually appeared, and she was referred to our department for treatment. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a tubular structure communicating between the aortic arch and pulmonary artery trunk, suggesting adult PDA. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed to close PDA. Completion angiography confirmed the disappearance of PDA. Post-TEVAR CT revealed no endoleak. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 11th day after surgery. TEVAR is more useful and less invasive for adult PDA than conventional open surgery.

Endografts placed in the aorta for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) may determine malappositioning to the lesser curvature of the aortic wall, thus resulting in a devastating complication known as endograft collapse. This premature device failure commonly occurs in young individuals after TEVAR for traumatic aortic injuries as a result of applications outside the physical conditions for which the endograft was designed. In this study, an experimentally-calibrated fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model was developed to assess the hemodynamic and stress/strain distributions acting on the excessive protrusion extension (PE) of endografts deployed in four young patients underwent TEVAR. Endograft infolding was experimentally measured for different hemodynamic scenarios by perfusion testing and then used to numerically calibrate the mechanical behavior of endograft PE. Results evinced that the extent of endograft can severely alter the hemodynamic and structural loads exerted on the endograft PE. Specifically, PE determined a physiological aortic coarctation into the aortic arch characterized by a helical flow in the distal descending aorta. High device displacement and transmural pressure across the stent-graft wall were found for a PE longer than 21 mm. Finally, marked intramural stress and principal strain distributions on the protruded segment of the endograft wall may suggest failure due to material fatigue. These critical parameters may contribute to the endograft collapse observed clinically and can be used to design new devices more suitable for young individuals to be treated with an endoprosthesis for TEVAR of blunt traumatic aortic injuries., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

An aortoesophageal fistula (AEF) is an extremely rare, potentially fatal condition, and aortic surgery is usually performed together with extracorporeal circulation. However, this surgical method has a high rate of surgical complications and mortality. This report describes an AEF caused by tuberculous esophagitis that was treated successfully using a two-stage operation. A 52-yr-old man was admitted to the hospital with severe hematemesis and syncope. Based on the computed tomography and diagnostic endoscopic findings, he was diagnosed with an AEF and initially underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Esophageal reconstruction was performed after controlling the mediastinal inflammation. The patient suffered postoperative anastomotic leakage, which was treated by an endoscopic procedure, and the patient was discharged without any further problems. The patient received 9 months of anti-tuberculosis treatment after he was diagnosed with histologically confirmed tuberculous esophagitis; subsequently, he was followed as an outpatient and has had no recurrence of the tuberculosis or any further issues.

Surgical repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Hybrid approaches that involve visceral debranching and aortic endografting allow for an alternative approach in certain high-risk patients. In most circumstances the visceral vessels can be bypassed in a retrograde manner from the iliac arteries via a midline laparotomy, and the aortic aneurysm subsequently excluded with standard aortic endografts. These procedures avoid the extensive two-cavity exposure, aortic cross-clamping, and mechanical circulatory support that comprise open TAAA repair, and offer the theoretical advantage of being less invasive. Despite this, outcomes have been mixed with reported perioperative mortality rates of 0% and 34% and permanent paraplegia rates of 0% to 13% in most major series. The reported outcomes, as well as the variation between centers, highlight the importance of patient selection in undertaking hybrid repair. In practice, the best outcomes are achieved in patients who have high-risk anatomy, rather than high-risk comorbidities., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest relevant to this publication.

Purposes: When placing stent grafts, deployment accuracy and birdbeaking due to inadequate conformability and device apposition along the inner curvature of the arch have been encountered. The new Conformable GORE® TAG® Thoracic Endoprosthesis (CTAG) is designed to have enhanced compression resistance and improved conformability in difficult anatomy. The present study compared the deployment accuracy and conformability of the CTAG Device with TAG Device., Method: Deployment accuracy and birdbeaking was compared of CTAG Device and TAG Device implantation for initial treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysm conducted by our department between March 2010 and March 2012. Deployment accuracy was defined as the distance between the actual and intended device implantation locations measured from DSA images., Results: Deployment accuracy at the time of implantation (mean ± SD) was significantly better for the CTAG Device compared to the TAG Device (2.2 ± 1.7 mm vs. 4.4 ± 3.0 mm, P <0.05). Also, while birdbeaking was seen in 8 of 20 cases (40%) for the TAG Device, it was only seen in 1 of 12 cases (8%) for the CTAG Device., Conclusion: The present study found enhanced deployment accuracy and conformability along the aortic arch using the CTAG Device compared to the previous-generation TAG Device.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is an effective strategy for type B dissection. Retrograde ascending dissection (RAD) intra-TEVAR is a rare complication on clinic. In this case, a 48-year-old Chinese man with Stanford type B aortic dissection suffered acute RAD during the TEVAR. And palliative stent grafts placement was performed in a local hospital, which earned the time for transfer and subsequent total arch replacement surgery in Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University. This report suggests that the palliative strategy may be an option for RAD in some specific situation.

Acute type B aortic dissection comprises approximately one-third of all aortic dissection cases. Although this catastrophic cardiovascular condition was first described in the medical literature over two centuries ago, data on the optimal diagnostic and treatment modalities for type B dissection was slow to evolve throughout the latter half of the twentieth century, even as newer diagnostic techniques and management strategies became commonplace. To further elucidate contemporary practice patterns and outcomes of aortic dissection, the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) was established in 1996. Over the past two decades, IRAD publications have steadily increased our knowledge and understanding about aortic dissection. Specifically in recent years, analyses of IRAD data have gone beyond simply characterizing the patient with acute type B aortic dissection and have attempted to identify the means by which the outcome of such a patient could be improved. Thus, we present herein three areas in which IRAD data has recently advanced our understanding of acute type B aortic dissection: temporal classification especially for the subacute time period, risk stratification for identifying complicated cases, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

Background: The treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection (CBAD) remains complicated. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has supplanted open surgical repair (OSR) as the preferred surgical treatment for CBAD. Despite TEVAR's superior short-term results, much less is understood about its long-term outcomes. As much of the understanding of OSR originates from historical report, contemporary series, with modern surgical techniques and technologies, may present an alternative to TEVAR. The present systematic review will assess the short- and long-term outcomes of historic and contemporary series of OSR for CBAD., Methods: Electronic searches were performed using six databases from their inception to March 2014. Relevant studies with OSRs for chronic type B dissection were identified. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and analyzed according to predefined clinical endpoints. Studies were sub-classified into the pre-endovascular (historic series) and endovascular era (contemporary series) depending on whether the majority of cases were performed after 1999., Results: Nineteen studies were identified for inclusion for quantitative analysis. Pooled short-term mortality was 11.1% overall, and 7.5% in the nine contemporary studies. Stroke, spinal cord ischemia, renal dysfunction, and reoperation for bleeding were 5.9%, 4.9%, 8.1%, and 8.1%, respectively, for the contemporary series. Absolute late reintervention was identified in 13.3% of patients overall, and in 11.3% of patients in the contemporary series. Aggregated survival at 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-years of all patients were 82.1%, 74.1%, 66.3%, and 50.8%, respectively., Conclusions: OSR for chronic type B dissection in the contemporary era offers acceptable results. Management approaches should be considered carefully, taking into account both short-term and long-term complications. More research is required to clarify specific indications for OSR and TEVAR in chronic type B dissections.

Despite advances in surgical techniques and postoperative management, the in-hospital mortality rate for patients undergoing conventional open surgical repair for type B dissections is still significant. In light of this, the less invasive surgical procedure for acute type B aortic dissections, defined as thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), was developed. Despite some controversy, the use of TEVAR for the management of type B aortic dissections has become commonplace. Generally, the main entry tear in type B aortic dissection is located in the vicinity of the orifice of the left subclavian artery (LSA). The proximal landing zone in the aortic arch must be secured as long as the aim of TEVAR for type B dissection is primary entry closure. This requires hybrid surgery that includes the use of open surgical procedures, such as debranching for revascularization of cervical branches. Despite the presence of challenging anatomic conditions in the aortic arch, hybrid repair has evolved as an increasingly viable alternative, and promising early and long-term results have been reported. As the next step, fenestrated and branched TEVAR techniques have recently been reported with satisfactory early results. In the coming years, there will be intense competition to develop the devices themselves, improve delivery systems, and supplement devices with auxiliary functions. Thus there is high expectations for the next generation and how they will improve and advance treatment methods of TEVAR for type B aortic dissections.

Dynamic aortic evaluation in planning thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is important to provide optimal stent graft sizing. Static imaging protocols do not consider normal aortic dynamics and may lead to stent graft to aorta mismatch, causing stent graft related complications, such as type I endoleak and stent graft migration. Dynamic imaging can assist in accurate stent graft selection and sizing preoperatively, and evaluate stent graft performance during follow-up. To create new imaging technologies, integration of knowledge between diverse scientific fields is essential (i.e., engineering, informatics and medicine). Different dynamic imaging modalities, such as electrocardiographic-gated computed tomography angiography (ECG-gated CTA) and four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI (4D PC-MRI), are progressively investigated and implemented into clinical practice as important instruments in preoperative planning for TEVAR. In time, further application of dynamic imaging tools for preoperative screening and follow-up after TEVAR might lead to better outcomes for patients. The advances in dynamic imaging for evaluation of the thoracic aorta using new imaging modalities and their future perspectives are addressed in this manuscript.

Objective: Available data on outcomes of combined proximal stent-grafting with distal bare stenting for management of aortic dissection are limited. The objective of this study was to provide a systematic review of outcomes of this approach., Methods: Studies involving combined proximal stent-grafting with distal bare stenting for management of aortic dissection were systematically searched and reviewed through MEDLINE databases., Results: A TOTAL OF FOUR STUDIES WERE INCLUDED: 108 patients treated for management of acute (n=54) and chronic (n=54) aortic dissection. The technical success rate was 95.3% (range, 84-100%). The 30-day mortality rate was 2.7% (range from 0% to 5%). The morbidity rate occurring within 30 days was 51.8% (range from 0% to 65%) and included stroke (2.7%), paraplegia (2.7%), retrograde dissection (1.8%), renal failure (14.8%), severe cardiopulmonary complications (5.5%) and bowel ischemia (0.9%). The incidence of type I endoleak was 9.2% (10/108). During follow-up, 5 (4.6%) deaths were related to aortic rupture or aortic repair. Mean re-intervention rate was 12.9%. Two cases (1.9%) of delayed retrograde type A dissection and one case of aortobronchial fistula (0.9%) were reported. The most common delayed complication was thoracic stent-graft migration (4.7%). The rate of device failure was 9.2%. Favorable aortic remodeling was observed: studies reporting midterm follow-up of the true lumen demonstrated a high rate of both false lumen regression and true lumen expansion. At 12 months, complete false lumen thrombosis was observed at the thoracic level in 70.4% and at the abdominal level in 13.5% of patients., Conclusions: Combined proximal stent-grafting with distal bare stenting appears to be a feasible approach for the management of Type B aortic dissection. Although this approach clearly improved true lumen perfusion and diameter, it failed to completely suppress false lumen patency. However, it should be acknowledged that contemporary data on this approach is limited to small studies with variable results.

In the past decade, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the primary treatment option in descending aneurysm and dissection. The clinical outcome of this minimally invasive technique is strictly related to an appropriate patient/stent graft selection, hemodynamic interactions, and operator skills. In this context, a quantitative assessment of the biomechanical stress induced in the aortic wall due to the stent graft may support the planning of the procedure. Different techniques of medical imaging, like computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, can be used to evaluate dynamics in the thoracic aorta. Such information can also be combined with dedicated patient-specific computer-based simulations, to provide a further insight into the biomechanical aspects. In clinical practice, computational analysis might show the development of aortic disease, such as the aortic wall segments which experience higher stress in places where rupture and dissection may occur. In aortic dissections, the intimal tear is usually located at the level of the sino-tubular junction and/or at the origin of the left subclavian artery. Besides, computational models may potentially be used preoperatively to predict stent graft behavior, virtually testing the optimal stent graft sizing, deployment, and conformability, in order to provide the best endovascular treatment. The present study reviews the current literature regarding the use of computational tools for TEVAR biomechanics, highlighting their potential clinical applications.