Search

All patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) have a preceding, asymptomatic expansion of clonal plasma cells, clinically recognized as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). While most patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance have a very small rate of progression, SMM is a widely heterogeneous condition where a fraction of patients will progress to symptomatic MM rather quickly, while others will experience an indolent clinical course. The differentiation between progressive and stable precursor condition thus represents one of the most important unmet clinical needs in the MM community. The ability to identify patients at high-risk of progression before major clonal expansion and onset of end-organ damage would enable strategies for early prevention and perhaps more effective intervention. All proposed criteria to predict the progression of myeloma precursor conditions are built around indirect markers of disease burden and, therefore, are generally able to accurately identify only a small fraction of patients in whom progression to MM is already occurring. Leveraging whole genome and exome sequencing, it has been shown that patients with stable myeloma precursor conditions are characterized by either absence or lower prevalence of distinct genomic events that are detectable in progressive precursor condition years before the progression. In this review, we discuss evolving genomic concepts and tools; and their ability to differentiate myeloma precursor conditions into two distinct entities: one benign (monoclonal gammopathy of benign significance) and another malignant (asymptomatic multiple myeloma).

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an intermediate pre-malignant condition with individuals having a distinct risk of progression to overt myeloma. The optimal management option has remained controversial due to the heterogeneous nature of the condition in which progression to overt diseases is variable. The question of who, when, and what to use for the treatment of SMM remains equivocal. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and summarized the current evidence supporting the best approach to the management of SMM.A comprehensive literature search of Medline/PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley Cochrane Library, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov, and conference proceedings of ASCO, ASH, EHA, and ESMO was performed on October 25, 2020. Synthesis of the result was done using narrative analysis.Of the total 1560 identified records, 10 eligible studies involving 1157 patients made up of 580 in the intervention group and 577 in the control group were included in this review. Three early trials of melphalan and prednisone fail to demonstrate any significant impact on disease progression with major toxicities reported. Three trials on bisphosphonate monotherapy show reduced skeletal-related events without any clinical effect on disease progression. Lenalidomide monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy demonstrates superiority in delaying disease progression over observation. Only Lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination demonstrated superior overall survival over observation across the trials.Trials of lenalidomide in a less intensive approach has shown promise in delaying disease progression and should be investigated further in clinical trials.

Monoclonal gammopathy of ocular significance (MGOS) is a rare subset of monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance occurring secondary to plasma cell disorders and causing ocular manifestations. We identified 23 patients with paraproteinemic keratopathy (PPK) in the setting of monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS, 10), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM, 3) or multiple myeloma (MM, 10). Many of these patients with PPK (11/23) presented decreased vision. All patients with MM and 40% of those with other diagnoses such as SMM and MGUS received systemic therapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation. Four eyes of four patients were treated by penetrating keratoplasty. In most cases, neither ocular nor hematologic treatment afforded a durable improvement in the visual acuity (recurrence after a median of 11 months), despite initial responses. Further studies will be required to determine the optimal strategy to treat and prevent the relapse of ocular symptoms in patients with PPK.

The Mayo-2018 smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) risk score is used routinely in the clinical setting but has only been validated at diagnosis. In SMM patients, the progression risk decreases over time. However, the utility of applying risk stratification models after diagnosis is unknown. We retrospectively studied 704 SMM patients and applied the Mayo 2018 and IMWG-2020 risk stratification models at annual landmark timepoints up to 5 years post diagnosis. The Mayo-2018 and IMWG-2020 models reliably stratified patients based on progression risk when applied post diagnosis. The respective 2-year progression risk in Mayo-2018 high risk patients versus IMWG-2020 intermediate-high risk patients was 51% versus 62% at the 1-year landmark and 47% versus 45% at the 4-year landmark. We showed that patients categorized at Mayo-2018 high-risk at follow-up had a similar risk of progression if the baseline risk assessment was low-intermediate versus high-risk (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.46–2.36, p = 0.931 at 5-year landmark). Patients migrating to a higher risk category during follow up had a higher progression risk compared to patients with stable/decreased risk categorization. Our findings support the use of these risk scores post-diagnosis and suggest that patients evolving to a high-risk category may benefit from early intervention therapeutic approaches.

While several case reports suggest an association between sarcoidosis and multiple myeloma (MM), few cases involve smoldering MM. We report a case of sarcoidosis and smoldering MM discovered simultaneously in a patient admitted for hypercalcemia. Initial tests raised suspicion for sarcoidosis and MM, prompting invasive testing. Surgical lung biopsy revealed necrotizing granulomas, which could represent sarcoidosis in the appropriate setting. Thus, sarcoidosis was diagnosed following a negative infectious workup. Bone marrow biopsy revealed 13% plasma cells leading to subsequent diagnosis of smoldering MM. This case demonstrates the challenge of determining disease activity when other causes of CRAB symptoms are present.

Purpose: Early intervention in smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) requires optimal risk stratification to avoid under- and overtreatment. We hypothesized that replacing bone marrow (BM) plasma cells (PC) for circulating tumor cells (CTC), and adding immune biomarkers in peripheral blood (PB) for the identification of patients at risk of progression due to lost immune surveillance, could improve the International Myeloma Working Group 20/2/20 model. Experimental Design: We report the outcomes of 150 patients with SMM enrolled in the iMMunocell study, in which serial assessment of tumor and immune cells in PB was performed every 6 months for a period of 3 years since enrollment. Results: Patients with >0.015% versus ≤0.015% CTCs at baseline had a median time-to-progression of 17 months versus not reached (HR, 4.9; P 20% BM PCs had no prognostic value in a multivariate analysis that included serum free light-chain ratio >20, >2 g/dL M-protein, and >0.015% CTCs. The 20/2/20 and 20/2/0.015 models yielded similar risk stratification (C-index of 0.76 and 0.78). The combination of the 20/2/0.015 model with an immune risk score based on the percentages of SLAN+ and SLAN− nonclassical monocytes, CD69+HLADR+ cytotoxic NK cells, and CD4+CXCR3+ stem central memory T cells, allowed patient’ stratification into low, intermediate-low, intermediate-high, and high-risk disease with 0%, 20%, 39%, and 73% rates of progression at 2 years. Conclusions: This study showed that CTCs outperform BM PCs for assessing tumor burden. Additional analysis in larger series are needed to define a consensus cutoff of CTCs for minimally invasive stratification of SMM.

Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic condition that occupies a space between monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and multiple myeloma (MM) along the spectrum of clonal plasma cell proliferative disorders. It is not a biologic intermediate stage between MGUS and MM, but rather represents a heterogeneous clinically defined condition in which some patients (approximately two-thirds) have MGUS (pre-malignancy), and some (approximately one-third) have MM (biologic malignancy). Unfortunately, no single pathologic or molecular feature can reliably distinguish these two groups of patients. For purposes of practice and clinical trials, specific risk factors are used to identify patients with SMM in whom malignant transformation has already likely occurred (high risk SMM). Patients with newly diagnosed high risk SMM should be offered therapy with lenalidomide or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) for 2 years, or enrollment in clinical trials. Patients with low risk SMM should be observed without therapy every 3–4 months.

Co-occurrence of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and plasma cell neoplasm in patients with no history of chemo and/or radiotherapy is rarely reported. Herein, we report a case of a female in her seventieth decade of life who was referred to the hospital for pancytopenia. The patient was asymptomatic and was doing well overall. Serum protein electrophoresis was remarkable for a lambda-restricted monoclonal protein (IgG) estimated at 1.8g/dL. Immunoglobulin G serum level was also elevated, and serum Kappa/Lambda free light chain ratio was decreased. At that time, a bone marrow biopsy showed myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts-2 (MDS-EB2) and a monoclonal plasma cell proliferation. Some studies have shown that patients with plasma cell neoplasm could be associated with an increased risk of developing MDS compared to the general population. Based on reviewing the literature, to our knowledge, the pathological mechanism of the co-occurrence of both diseases is not yet clear.

Background—smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM) is highly heterogeneous and several models have been suggested to predict this risk. Lakshman et al. recently proposed a model based on three biomarkers: bone marrow plasma cell (BMPC) percentage &gt, 20%, free light chain ratio (FLCr) &gt, 20 and serum M protein &gt, 20 g/L. The goal of our study was to test this “20/20/20” model in our population and to determine if similar results could be obtained in another cohort of SMM patients. Method—we conducted a retrospective, single center study with 89 patients diagnosed with SMM between January 2008 and December 2019. Results—all three tested biomarkers were associated with an increased risk of progression: BMPC percentage ≥ 20% (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.28 [95%C.I., 1.90–9.61], p &lt, 0.001), serum M protein ≥ 20 g/L (HR: 4.20 [95%C.I., 1.90–15.53], p = 0.032) and FLCr ≥ 20 (HR: 3.25 [95%C.I., 1.09–9.71], p = 0.035). The estimated median time to progression (TTP) was not reached for the low and intermediate risk groups and was 29.1 months (95%C.I., 3.9–54.4) in the high-risk group (p = 0.006). Conclusions—the 20/20/20 risk stratification model adequately predicted progression in our population and is easy to use in various clinical settings.

Junhui Xu,* Mangju Wang,* Ye Shen, Miao Yan, Weiwei Xie, Bingjie Wang, Huihui Liu, Xinan Cen Department of Hematology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Xinan CenDepartment of Hematology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xi Shi Ku Street, Xi Cheng District, Beijing, 100034, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86-10-83575746Email cenxn@bjmu.edu.cnBackground: Amyloid light-chain amyloidosis (AL amyloidosis) is commonly associated with multiple myeloma. However, the clinical characteristics and prognosis of symptomatic and smoldering multiple myeloma with AL amyloidosis are not particularly clear.Methods: Patients with symptomatic and smoldering multiple myeloma in the Peking University First Hospital registry from 2010 to 2018 were studied. The clinical and laboratory information was collected from first presentation to death or until the last available clinical follow-up. The patients’ survival and outcomes were analyzed, and the relationship between the clinical parameters and survival was also assessed.Results: Compared with symptomatic multiple myeloma patients without AL amyloidosis, patients with AL amyloidosis had higher incidence of BNP≧700pg/mL (P< 0.001), ALP> 187.5IU/L (P=0.032) and ALB< 25g/L (P< 0.001). Similarly, compared with smoldering multiple myeloma patients without AL amyloidosis, patients with AL amyloidosis had higher incidence of BNP≧700pg/mL (P=0.030) and Alb< 25g/L (P=0.024). The existence of AL amyloidosis, especially those with the heart involvement, was related to shorter long-term survival of symptomatic and smoldering multiple myeloma according to univariate analyses. Renal involvement and gastrointestinal tract involvement had an impact on the prognosis of smoldering multiple myeloma but not on the symptomatic multiple myeloma. Cox regression model for overall survival detected BNP≧700pg/mL in symptomatic multiple myeloma having independent poorer prognostic significance (HR=2.455, P=0.004). Interestingly, BNP at diagnosis was significantly correlated with cardiac amyloidosis (r=0.496, P< 0.001). Cox regression model for overall survival detected the presence of AL amyloidosis in smoldering multiple myeloma having independent poorer prognostic significance (HR=8.741, P=0.002).Conclusion: AL amyloidosis is an independent poor prognostic factor for not only symptomatic multiple myeloma but also smoldering multiple myeloma. It is mainly because of involvement of important organs, especially the heart. AL amyloidosis probably has a greater impact on the prognosis of smoldering multiple myeloma than on the symptomatic multiple myeloma.Keywords: symptomatic multiple myeloma, smoldering multiple myeloma, AL amyloidosis, poor prognostic factor

Introduction Daratumumab is a CD38-targeting monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated clinical benefit for multiple myeloma. Daratumumab inhibition of CD38, which is expressed on immune cell populations and cardiomyocytes, could potentially affect cardiac function. This QTc substudy of the phase 2 CENTAURUS study investigated the potential effect of intravenous daratumumab monotherapy on QTc prolongation and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, including concentration-QTc effect modeling. Methods Patients had intermediate- or high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. Patients with QT interval corrected by Fridericia’s formula (QTcF) > 470 ms, QRS interval ≥ 110 ms, or PR interval ≥ 200 ms were excluded. Triplicate ECGs were collected at screening, Dose 1, and Dose 8. Analyses of on-treatment ECGs were conducted with a time-matched baseline (primary analysis). By time-point, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), and outlier analyses were conducted. Results Of 123 patients in CENTAURUS, 31 were enrolled in the QTc substudy. Daratumumab produced a small increase in heart rate (5–12 beats per minute) of unclear significance. There was a small but clinically insignificant effect on QTc, as measured by both time-matched time-point and PK/PD analyses. The primary analysis demonstrated a maximum mean increase in QTcF of 9.1 ms (90% 2-sided upper confidence interval [CI], 14.1 ms). The primary PK/PD analysis predicted a maximum QTcF increase of 8.5 ms (90% 2-sided upper CI, 13.5 ms). No patient had an abnormal U wave, a new QTcF > 500 ms, or > 60 ms change from baseline for QTcF. Conclusion Analysis of ECG intervals and concentration-QTc relationships showed a small but clinically insignificant effect of daratumumab. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02316106. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-020-01601-w.

The presence of monoclonal proteins is common, with a prevalence in the United States around 5% that increases with age. Although most patients are asymptomatic, most cases are caused by a clonal plasma cell disorder. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) are asymptomatic precursor conditions with variable risk of progression to multiple myeloma. In recent years, significant progress has been made to better understand the factors that lead to the development of symptoms and progression to myeloma. This review summarizes the current diagnosis treatment guidelines for MGUS and SMM and highlights recent advances that underscore a shifting paradigm in the evaluation and management of plasma cell precursor conditions.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common malignant neoplasm of the hematological system. It often develops from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) precursor states. In this process, the immune microenvironment interacts with the MM cells to exert yin and yang effects, promoting tumor progression on the one hand and inhibiting it on the other. Despite significant therapeutic advances, MM remains incurable, and the main reason for this may be related to the complex and variable immune microenvironment. Therefore, it is crucial to investigate the dynamic relationship between the immune microenvironment and tumors, to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of different factors in the microenvironment, and to develop novel therapeutic agents targeting the immune microenvironment of MM. In this paper, we review the latest research progress and describe the dual influences of the immune microenvironment on the development and progression of MM from the perspective of immune cells and molecules.

The definition of multiple myeloma (MM) was updated in 2014, with the intent to enable earlier treatment and thereby avoid appearance of end-organ damage at progression from smouldering multiple myeloma (SMM) to MM. The purpose of this study was to investigate to which extent the development of end-organ damage at progression to MM was reduced under the updated guidelines. In this prospective observational cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01374412), between 2014 and 2020, 96 SMM patients prospectively underwent whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (wb-MRI) and serological follow-up at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. A total of 22 patients progressed into MM during follow-up, of which seven (32%) showed SLiM-criteria only but no end-organ damage. Four (57%) of the seven patients who progressed by SLiM-criteria only progressed with1 focal lesion (FL) or a growing FL, and three (43%) due to serum free light-chain-ratio ≥100. Fifteen (68%) out of 22 patients who progressed still suffered from end-organ damage at progression. The updated disease definition reduced the proportion of SMM patients suffering from end-organ damage at progression to MM by one third. wb-MRI is an important tool for detection of SMM patients who progress to MM without end-organ damage.

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has the potential to capture spatial genetic heterogeneity in myeloma (MM) patients. We assessed whether cfDNA levels vary according to risk status defined by the 70 gene expression profile (GEP70). cfDNA levels in 77 patients were significantly higher in the GEP70 high-risk (HR) group compared to the low-risk (LR) group and correlated weakly with clinical markers including lactate dehydrogenase, β2 -microglobulin, and ISS. Patients with high cfDNA levels were associated with a worse PFS (hazard ratio 6.4; 95% CI of ratio 1.9-22) and OS (hazard ratio 4.4; 95% CI of ratio 1.2-15.7). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was elevated in the HR group and ctDNA correlated strongly with GEP70 risk score (Spearman r = .69, P = .0027). cfDNA concentrations were significantly elevated between days 3-5 after chemotherapy before falling back to baseline levels. ctDNA in two patients showed a similar spike in levels between days 3 and 5 after chemotherapy with a concomitant increase in allele fraction of KRAS mutations. We assessed cfDNA levels in 25 patients with smoldering myeloma with serial samples and showed increased allele fraction of mutated KRAS at progression in cfDNA. Our study shows that cfDNA is a dynamic tool to capture genetic events in myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a highly heterogenous disease that exists along a continuous disease spectrum starting with premalignant conditions monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) that inevitably precede MM. Over the past two decades, significant progress has been made in the genetic characterization and risk stratification of precursor plasma cell disorders. Indeed, the clinical introduction of highly effective and well-tolerated drugs begs the question: would earlier therapeutic intervention with novel therapies in MGUS and SMM patients alter natural history, providing a potential curative option? In this review, we discuss the epidemiology of MGUS and SMM and current models for risk stratification that predict MGUS and SMM progression to MM. We further discuss genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution in MM and the interplay between tumor cells and the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. Finally, we provide an overview of the current recommendations for the management of MGUS and SMM and discuss the open controversies in the field in light of promising results from early intervention clinical trials.

Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy and is characterized by bone marrow infiltration of monoclonal plasma cells and end-organ involvement. Smoldering MM (SMM) is an intermediate clinical entity between MGUS and MM, with a risk of progression to symptomatic disease at 10% per year. Bone disease is the most frequent related symptom of MM, with approximately 90% of patients developing bone lesions throughout their disease course. Therefore, imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and management of these patients. Conventional radiography was traditionally considered as the standard of care, however the limited sensitivity in detecting osteolytic bone lesions has led to more advanced imaging modalities. Imaging also is of high importance to discriminate MM from smoldering disease, since the presence of bone lesions establishes the diagnosis of active disease and requires treatment initiation. Computed tomography (CT) was found to be the most sensitive modality in detecting small osteolytic bone lesions less than 5 mm. Ionizing radiation exposure was one of the main limitations of this technique. Technological advances have made possible low dose assessment of the entire skeleton with effective radiation doses comparable to those of a whole-body plain radiographic skeletal survey. Furthermore, the low dose CT is widely available and has a very short scan time. Therefore, whole-body low dose CT (WBLDCT) has been incorporated in the latest diagnostic criteria of the IMWG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of WBLDCT in the early identification of patients with asymptomatic MM who progress with bone disease only and who require immediate antimyeloma treatment. Patients and Methods: Our study was approved by the local IRB and all patients provided informed consent. All patients diagnosed with SMM based on the 2003 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) definition of SMM were serially assessed with WBLDCT from July 2013 until March 2020 as part of our institutional workup. The assessments were performed at baseline, 1-year post diagnosis and every 1 year thereafter. The patients enrolled in the study were those who had at least 2 consecutive CT assessments at the above described time points. All WBLDCT exams were performed with a 16-detector CT scanner. The CTs were evaluated by two experienced radiologists, blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. RESULTS We prospectively evaluated 100 patients with SMM (median age at diagnosis 61 years, range 40-86 years, 52 female /48 male) who underwent WBLDCT at the above described time points. Median number of WBLDCTs exams performed was 2.5 (range 2-5). Totally, 31 patients progressed (either with CRAB criteria and/or at least one myeloma defining event). During a median follow up of 57 months 31 patients have progressed (with either CRAB criteria and/or at least one myeloma defininf event). Importantly, 10 of 31 patients progressed only with bone lesions that were identified on the scheduled WBLDCT as per protocol. Median time to progression from asymptomatic to symptomatic disease for all patients has not been reached, while median time for those who actually progressed was 22 months (95% CI:15,6-28,4). For the subgroup of patients who progressed with bone lesions only the median time was also 22 months (95%CI:3,4-40,6). Median time to progression was not statistically different between the two progressor subgroups. All patients were initiated with antimyeloma treatment immediately post evolution to symptomatic disease. PFS for all 31 patients at first line treatment was 52 months (95%CI:34,5-69,5) and median PFS for bone progressors has not yet been reached. Among the patients who progressed 29 were alive at the time of the analysis. The 2 deaths that occurred were one related (progressive disease) and one unrelated to multiple myeloma (cardiovascular event). Neither had progressed with isolated bone involvement. Conclusion: In conclusion, our strategy allowed early detection of bone lesions in 10% of our patients and these patients were immediately initiated with antimyeloma treatment to avoid further myeloma-related complications. Consecutive low-dose WBLDCT studies can identify early myeloma evolution to symptomatic disease and optimize the disease monitoring along with our therapeutic strategy. Disclosures Gavriatopoulou: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kastritis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Terpos:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Medison: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Honoraria, Other: travel expenses , Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.

PURPOSE Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a precursor condition of multiple myeloma (MM) with a 10% annual risk of progression. Various prognostic models exist for risk stratification; however, those are based on solely clinical metrics. The discovery of genomic alterations that underlie disease progression to MM could improve current risk models. METHODS We used next-generation sequencing to study 214 patients with SMM. We performed whole-exome sequencing on 166 tumors, including 5 with serial samples, and deep targeted sequencing on 48 tumors. RESULTS We observed that most of the genetic alterations necessary for progression have already been acquired by the diagnosis of SMM. Particularly, we found that alterations of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway ( KRAS and NRAS single nucleotide variants [SNVs]), the DNA repair pathway (deletion 17p, TP53, and ATM SNVs), and MYC (translocations or copy number variations) were all independent risk factors of progression after accounting for clinical risk staging. We validated these findings in an external SMM cohort by showing that patients who have any of these three features have a higher risk of progressing to MM. Moreover, APOBEC associated mutations were enriched in patients who progressed and were associated with a shorter time to progression in our cohort. CONCLUSION SMM is a genetically mature entity whereby most driver genetic alterations have already occurred, which suggests the existence of a right-skewed model of genetic evolution from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to MM. We identified and externally validated genomic predictors of progression that could distinguish patients at high risk of progression to MM and, thus, improve on the precision of current clinical models.

Current guidelines for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) recommend active monitoring until the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) before initiating treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial. Earlier intervention may delay progression to MM. In CENTAURUS, 123 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk SMM were randomly assigned to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on extended intense (intense), extended intermediate (intermediate), or short dosing schedules. At the prespecified primary analysis (15.8-month median follow-up), the complete response (CR) rates (co-primary endpoint) were 2.4%, 4.9%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively; the co-primary endpoint of CR rate >15% was not met. Progressive disease (PD)/death rates (number of patients who progressed or died divided by total duration of progression-free survival [PFS] in patient-years; co-primary endpoint) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.055 (80% confidence interval [CI], 0.014–0.096), 0.102 (80% CI, 0.044–0.160), and 0.206 (80% CI, 0.118–0.295), respectively, translating to a median PFS ≥24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001 for all arms). Twenty-four–month PFS rates were 89.9% (90% CI, 78.5–95.4%), 82.0% (90% CI, 69.0–89.9%), and 75.3% (90% CI, 61.1–85.0%) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that intense dosing maintained target-saturating trough concentrations in most patients throughout weekly, every-2-week, and every-4-week dosing periods. No new safety signals were observed. These data provide the basis for an ongoing phase 3 study of daratumumab in SMM.

Forty years ago this year, smoldering multiple myeloma was defined as a clinical entity that identifies a group of patients with a substantial burden of disease but with a relatively indolent natural history compared with symptomatic disease. Since then, there has been a revolution in the therapeutic options for multiple myeloma. The aim of this article is to describe recent advances in the identification of those patients who are at the highest risk of progression and whether they may benefit from therapy. Treatment of smoldering myeloma is an area of active debate and we present contrasting interpretations of the available trial data. We conclude by identifying the priorities for research that will help to clarify the management of this condition, which can be challenging for physicians and patients alike.

Background The prevalences of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, both of which are components of metabolic syndrome, are known to be increased among patients with multiple myeloma (MM), but remain undetermined among patients with smoldering MM (SMM). Methods Changes in various components of metabolic syndrome were investigated during the follow-up of patients with either MM or SMM compared to healthy controls. The data of 153 patients (105 with MM and 48 with SMM) and 138 controls were accessed from our medical center’s records between 2008 and 2015. We analyzed the patients’ data at diagnosis (baseline) and after 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up. Results Patients with SMM had a significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia at baseline compared to controls. A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed a higher risk to develop dyslipidemia after 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up among the SMM patients. The MM patients had a higher risk to develop diabetes after 1 year, hypertension after 5 years, and dyslipidemia after 1, 3, and 5 years of follow-up. Conclusions These data demonstrate that patients with SMM and those with MM are more prone to develop various components of metabolic syndrome, and they stress the importance of following-up metabolic syndrome components in both groups of patients.

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) are rapidly changing the therapeutic scenario of multiple myeloma. Most of the available data, however, come from studies performed in patients with relapsed or refractory disease.Area covered: Here, the most recent results from clinical trials that have investigated (or are investigating) efficacy and safety of MoAbs as front-line treatments in both transplant-eligible and not-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, as well as in smoldering myeloma, are reviewed. PubMed reported articles before 28 March 2020, and abstracts presented at the last ASCO, ASH, EHA, and IMW meetings were considered. Among others, pertinent data regarding daratumumab, isatuximab, elotuzumab, and pembrolizumab will be analyzed.Expert opinion: Introduction of MoAbs as first-line therapy will likely provide a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of patients with multiple myeloma. This will also require an appropriate re-positioning of salvage therapies. The role of MoAbs in smoldering myeloma appears to be promising, but adequate follow-up is needed.

Background The International Myeloma Working Group has defined smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) as the presence of 10%-60% plasma cells in the bone marrow and M-protein (IgG, IgA) ≥3 g/dL without end-organ damage (an increased calcium level, renal failure, anemia, and destructive bone lesions). Areas of uncertainty Patients considered to have SMM should not have any myeloma-defining events or amyloidosis. Different risks factors classify SMM into low-, intermediate-, or high-risk categories. The rate of progression from SMM to symptomatic myeloma is ∼10% per year during the first 5 years of diagnosis. SMM requires frequent follow-up ∼every 3 months during the first 5 years as compared to monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance, which usually requires follow-up every 6-12 months after the first year of diagnosis. Data sources A literature search was performed from electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid SP/PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and from annual meeting abstracts from inception to May 2017. Therapeutic advances This review presents the literature and available data that support or do not support early treatment of high-risk SMM (HR-SMM) and provides evidence-based recommendations for management of SMM patients. Despite emerging data recommending early treatment of HR-SMM, we predict the SMM category may disappear in the near future and patients will be diagnosed with either multiple myeloma or monoclonal gammopathy of undermined significance. Conclusions Success with early therapy trials for HR-SMM is largely due to patients meeting current criteria for multiple myeloma that may have been classified as SMM and, therefore, benefitted from therapy. Based on current practices and the literature, SMM should be managed with close follow-up. Based on available data, we suggest SMM to only be treated in clinical trial settings.

Acquired von Willebrand syndrome is a rare bleeding disorder often secondary to an underlying lymphoproliferative disorder. We report a case in whom response of both the acquired von Willebrand syndrome and smoldering multiple myeloma persist 14 months after daratumumab treatment discontinuation.

There is remarkable progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) with significant improvement in survival in the past 10 years. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) can evolve into symptomatic multiple myeloma (sy-MM) with organ involvement. SMM has associated with a much higher progression to MM compared to MGUS. In 2014, International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) reclassified ultra-high-risk smoldering myeloma patients with bone marrow plasma cells > 60% or serum-free light chain ratio (FLCr) > 100 or > 1 focal bone lesion on the magnetic resonance imaging as MM. SMM is a heterogeneous disorder with probability for progression to myeloma up to 50% in the first 5 years. Several risk models and clinical features have been identified to stratify the risk of progression to MM. Thanks to advances in our understanding of the genomic profile of MM, there are several ongoing clinical trials, and genomic studies are being done to assess the risk of progression to MM and early intervention. There is still no standard criterion regarding when to start therapy. This review discusses identifying SMM patients who are at high risk of progression to sy-MM and recent development of new and early treatment strategies and ongoing clinical trials for these high-risk SMM patients.

IgE multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare subtype of MM that is easily misdiagnosed. We report a rare case of IgE-MM and investigate the application of the SLiM-CRAB criteria to screen for high-risk smoldering MM (SMM) patients, so as to summarize the causes and methods used to prevent missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis in IgE-MM.The serum monoclonal protein (M-protein) classification and IgE quantification was performed and sent to several individual institutions. The results were collected and the causes of IgE detection defects were analyzed.Upon admission to our hospital, the patient's serum free kappa light chain was 1069.9 mg/L, free lambda light chain was 9.2 mg/L, and free kappa/lambda ratio was 115.9, which met the SLiM criteria, but without CRAB features. Immunofixation electrophoresis (IF) showed "M-like protein aggregation bands" in all lanes. After pretreatment with 1% β-mercaptoethanol to depolymerize the aggregation of monoclonal protein, the "M-like protein aggregation bands disappeared. The other five institutions did not provide the correct typing results. The quantification of serum IgE was as high as 2.06 × 10High-risk biomarkers in SLiM criteria can achieve good therapeutic effects in rare IgE-MM patients. Serum immunofixation performed without antisera against IgE, insufficient identification of the lytic bands produced by high macromolecule aggregation in IF, and the absence of a prozone effect avoidance procedure during IgE quantitative detection are the primary causes of missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis in patients with IgE-MM.

The adage for smoldering myeloma (SMM) has been to observe without treatment, until criteria for active multiple myeloma were satisfied. Definitions and risk stratification models have become more sophisticated, with prognostication tailored to include high-risk cytogenetics as per the most recent International Myeloma Working Group 2020 risk model. Moreover, progress in defining genomic evolution and changes in the bone marrow microenvironment through the monoclonal continuum have given insight into the complexities underlying the different patterns of progression observed in SMM. Given recent data showing improved progression-free survival with early intervention in high-risk SMM, the current dilemma is focused on how these patients should be treated. This case-based article maps the significant advancements made in the diagnosis and risk stratification of SMM. Data from landmark clinical trials will also be discussed, and ongoing trials are summarized. Ultimately, we outline our approach to SMM and hope to impart to the reader a sound concept of the current clinical management of SMM.

According to the updated International Myeloma Working Group criteria, smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic plasma cell disorder characterized by an M-component >3 g/dL, bone marrow plasma cell infiltration >10% and

International audience; Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is a heterogeneous group of asymptomatic plasma cell disorder characterized by the presence of monoclonal protein >= 30 g/L and/or 10-60% of bone marrow plasma cells and no evidence of SLiM-CRAB criteria according to the 2014 International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) recommendations. Once the effort to reclassify SMM with active disease as MM requiring treatment was completed, the need to redefine new high-risk SMM arose. The 20/2/20 and the IMWG risk model with the add-on high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities allow to identify high-risk SMM with 50% risk of progression to MM within 2 years, and therefore might help to propose a better therapeutic approach, either with the goal to << cure >> by profoundly debulk the MM with aggressive therapies, or alternatively to restore the immune surveillance like a << delay >> strategy with immune-based therapies. The debate is still ongoing but clearly challenges the watch-and-wait standard of care.