Search

Abstract The guidelines released by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA) in 2022 and those released in 2021 by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) play a crucial role in offering evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). This comprehensive review aims to provide an overview of these guidelines, incorporating insights from relevant clinical trials. While there is considerable alignment between the two sets of guidelines, certain notable differences arise due to variations in publication timelines, which we will outline. By presenting this summary, our objective is to empower clinicians to make informed decisions regarding HF management in their own practice, and facilitate the development of more harmonized guidelines in the future.

Heba A Abdeen,1 Zeinab M Helmy,1 Moustafa I Elnaggar,2 Monira I Aldhahi,3 Mona Mohamed Taha,3 Elena Marques-Sule,4 Doaa I Amin,5 Bassem S Ibrahim,6 Ahmed Abdel Aziz,6 Vincenzo Castiglione,7 Hady Atef1,8 1Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiovascular/Respiratory Disorder and Geriatrics, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Giza, 11432, Egypt; 2Faculty of Physical Therapy, Heliopolis University for Sustainable Development, Giza, Egypt; 3Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia; 4Physiotherapy in Motion, Multispeciality Research Group (PTinMOTION), Department of Physiotherapy, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; 5Basic Science Department, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; 6Cardiology, National Heart Institute, Giza, Egypt; 7Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio; “Health Science” Interdisciplinary Research Center, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy; 8School of Allied Health Professions (SAHP), Keele University, Staffordshire, UKCorrespondence: Mona Mohamed Taha, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia, Tel +966118240811, Email momtaha@pnu.edu.saBackground: Multiple comorbidities and physiological changes play a role in a range of heart failure conditions and influence the most effective approach to exercise-based rehabilitation. This research aimed to examine and compare the outcomes of continuous training at three different intensities, focusing on left ventricular (LV) remodeling, functional capacity, and quality of life among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Methods: In this randomized control trial, a total of 60 male patients (average age: 54.33 ± 2.35 years) with HFrEF were randomly allocated into three groups: 1) High-intensity continuous training group (HICT), 2) Moderate-intensity continuous training group (MICT), and 3) Low-intensity continuous training group (LICT). All the training was performed on a bicycle ergometer 3 times/week for 12 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), and functional capacity (6-minute walking test) were assessed before and the end of the study.Results: The HICT group demonstrated the greatest improvements in all measured variables when compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). These findings were consistent across all measured outcomes.Conclusion: It was determined that HICT appears to yield the most favorable outcomes in enhancing echocardiographic measures, NT-proBNP levels, quality of life, and functional capacity among HFrEF patients.Keywords: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, aerobic exercises, ventricular remodeling, quality of life

Abstract Background Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular (LV) HDF as a predictive marker for LV remodeling after CRT. Methods Patients with heart failure, EF 0.87. Intragroup comparison found higher HDF ratio in systole compared to diastole for responders (p = 0.003), but not for non-responders (p = 0.8). Conclusion Hemodynamic force ratio is a potential marker for identifying patients with heart failure and LBBB who are unlikely to benefit from CRT. Larger-scale studies are required before implementation of HDF analysis into clinical practice. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Background Insulin is commonly used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to achieve glycemic control. However, recent evidence showed that insulin use is associated with poor outcomes in the context of heart failure (HF). Since heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for approximately 50% of cases in the general HF population, we aimed to evaluate the effect of insulin treatment on left ventricular (LV) remodeling and contractility abnormalities in a HFrEF cohort and assess whether insulin was a predictor of adverse outcomes in this entity. Methods A total of 377 HFrEF patients who underwent cardiac MRI were included and divided according to diabetes status and the need for insulin treatment. LV structural and functional indices, as well as systolic strains, were measured. The determinants of impaired myocardial strains were assessed using linear regression analysis. The associated endpoints were determined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Results T2DM patients on insulin displayed a higher indexed LV end-diastolic volume and LV mass than those with T2DM not on insulin or those without T2DM, despite similar LV ejection fractions, accompanied by a higher three-dimensional spherical index (P

Abstract Aims In a large proportion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients, echocardiographic estimation of left atrial pressure (LAP) is not possible when the ratio of the peak early left ventricular filling velocity over the late filling velocity (E/A ratio) is not available, which may occur due to several potential causes. Left atrial reservoir strain (LASr) is correlated with LV filling pressures and may serve as an alternative parameter in these patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether LASr can be used to estimate LAP in HFrEF patients in whom E/A ratio is not available. Methods and results Echocardiograms of chronic HFrEF patients were analysed and LASr was assessed with speckle tracking echocardiography. LAP was estimated using the current ASE/EACVI algorithm. Patients were divided into those in whom LAP could be estimated using this algorithm (LAPe) and into those in whom this was not possible because E/A ratio was not available (LAPne). We assessed the prognostic value of LASr on the primary endpoint (PEP), which comprised the composite of hospitalization for the management of acute or worsened HF, left ventricular assist device implantation, cardiac transplantation, and cardiovascular death, whichever occurred first in time. We studied 153 patients with a mean age of 58 years of whom 76% men and 82% who were in NYHA class I‐II. A total of 86 were in the LAPe group and 67 in the LAPne group. LASr was significantly lower in the LAPne group as compared with the LAPe group (15.8% vs. 23.8%, P

Abstract Aims In this study, we estimated the 30 day all‐cause and heart failure‐specific readmission rates, predictors, mortality, and hospitalization costs in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and results This is a retrospective cohort study using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality's National Readmission Database for the year 2019. The primary outcome was the 30 day all‐cause hospital readmission rate. The secondary outcomes were (i) in‐hospital mortality rate for index admissions; (ii) 30 day mortality rate for index hospitalizations; (iii) the five most common principal diagnosis for readmission; (iv) readmission in‐hospital mortality rate; (v) length of hospital stay; (vi) independent risk factors for readmission; and (vii) hospitalization costs. We identified 6908 hospitalizations that met our study definition. The mean patient age was 62.8 years, and women comprised only 27.6% of patients. The 30 day all‐cause readmission rate was 23.4%. 48.9% of readmissions were due to decompensated heart failure. The in‐hospital mortality rate during readmissions was significantly higher than that of the index admission (5.6% vs. 2.4%; P

Background: Activation of the reninangi otens in-aldosterone system has an important role in the pathophysiology of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. While the effects of systemic reninangi otens in-aldosterone system activation on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are well known, the impact of the local reninangi otens in-aldosterone system on heart failure with reduced ejection fraction is not fully understood because of limited clinical research. This study aimed to investigate the effect of urinary angiotensinogen level, an accepted indicator of local reninangi otens in-aldosterone system activation, on all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 60 patients with baseline urinary angiotensinogen data and survival/mortality data at 4 years. Urinary angiotensinogen values were standardized to the urinary creatinine value measured from the same urine sample. The median urinary angio tensi nogen /urin ary creatinine value among all patients (114 μg/g) was used as a cutoff to divide the patients into 2 groups. Mortality data were obtained from the national registry systems or by telephone. Results: Comparison of all-cause mortality in the 2 groups showed that 22 deaths (71%) occurred in the group with a urinary angio tensinogen/urinary creatinine ratio above the median and 10 deaths (35.5%) occurred in the group of patients with urinary angio tensinogen/urinary creatinine equal to or below the median value (P =.005). Conclusion: Our study suggests that urinary angiotensinogen can be used as a new biomarker in the prognosis and follow-up of heart failure patients.

Abstract Heart failure is a significant public health concern characterized by notable rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite the presence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), its utilization remains inadequate. This practical recommendation paper focuses on the utilization of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) as a pivotal treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). The recommendations presented in this paper have been developed by a group of cardiologists in India who convened six advisory board meetings to discuss the utilization of ARNI in the management of heart failure. The paper emphasizes the importance of accurate biomarkers for diagnosing heart failure, particularly N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which are commonly used. Additionally, the paper advocates the use of imaging, specifically echocardiography, in diagnosing and monitoring heart failure patients. Moreover, the paper highlights the role of ARNI in heart failure management, with numerous clinical trials that have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, enhancing quality of life, and diminishing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. This practical recommendation paper offers valuable insights into the utilization of ARNI in the management of heart failure, aiming to enhance the implementation of GDMT and ultimately alleviate the burden of heart failure on society.

BackgroundExercise training is commonly employed as a efficacious supplementary treatment for individuals suffering from heart failure, but the optimal exercise regimen is still controversial. The objective of the review was to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on the exercise capacity, cardiac function, quality of life (QoL) and heart rate among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.MethodsA systematic search was performed using the following eight databases from their inception to July 5, 2023: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, China Knowledge Network, Wan fang Data, and the China Biology Medicine databases. The meta-analysis results were presented as mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used for the included studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations was used to assess the certainty of evidence.ResultsThirteen randomized controlled trials were included in the study. The results showed that HIIT had a significant positive effect on peak oxygen uptake (MD = 1.78, 95% CI for 0.80–2.76), left ventricular ejection fraction (MD = 3.13, 95% CI for 1.25–5.02), six-minute walk test (MD = 28.13, 95% CI for 14.56–41.70), and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MD = −4.45, 95% CI for −6.25 to −2.64) compared to MICT. However, there were no statistically significant differences observed in resting heart rate and peak heart rate.ConclusionsHIIT significantly improves peak oxygen uptake, left ventricular ejection fraction, six-minute walk test, and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Additionally, HIIT exhibits greater effectiveness in improving peak oxygen uptake among patients with lower body mass index.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2023.7.0100, identifier (INPLASY2023.7.0100).

BackgroundA metabolic shift from fatty acid (FAO) to glucose oxidation (GO) occurs during cardiac hypertrophy (LVH) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), which is mediated by PGC-1α and PPARα. While the transcription factor EB (TFEB) regulates the expression of both PPARGC1A/PGC-1α and PPARA/PPARα, its contribution to metabolic remodeling is uncertain.MethodsLuciferase assays were performed to verify that TFEB regulates PPARGC1A expression. Cardiomyocyte-specific Tfeb knockout (cKO) and wildtype (WT) male mice were subjected to 27G transverse aortic constriction or sham surgery for 21 and 56 days, respectively, to induce LVH and HFrEF. Echocardiographic, morphological, and histological analyses were performed. Changes in markers of cardiac stress and remodeling, metabolic shift and oxidative phosphorylation were investigated by Western blot analyses, mass spectrometry, qRT-PCR, and citrate synthase and complex II activity measurements.ResultsLuciferase assays revealed that TFEB increases PPARGC1A/PGC-1α expression, which was inhibited by class IIa histone deacetylases and derepressed by protein kinase D. At baseline, cKO mice exhibited a reduced cardiac function, elevated stress markers and a decrease in FAO and GO gene expression compared to WT mice. LVH resulted in increased cardiac remodeling and a decreased expression of FAO and GO genes, but a comparable decline in cardiac function in cKO compared to WT mice. In HFrEF, cKO mice showed an improved cardiac function, lower heart weights, smaller myocytes and a reduction in cardiac remodeling compared to WT mice. Proteomic analysis revealed a comparable decrease in FAO- and increase in GO-related proteins in both genotypes. A significant reduction in mitochondrial quality control genes and a decreased citrate synthase and complex II activities was observed in hearts of WT but not cKO HFrEF mice.ConclusionsTFEB affects the baseline expression of metabolic and mitochondrial quality control genes in the heart, but has only minor effects on the metabolic shift in LVH and HFrEF in mice. Deletion of TFEB plays a protective role in HFrEF but does not affect the course of LVH. Further studies are needed to elucidate if TFEB affects the metabolic flux in stressed cardiomyocytes.

Patients with an established diagnosis of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are prone to experience episodes of worsening symptoms and signs despite continued therapy, termed "worsening heart failure" (WHF). Despite guideline-directed medical therapy, worsening of chronic heart failure accounts for almost 50% of all hospital admissions for HF, and patients experiencing WHF carry a substantially higher risk of death and hospitalization than patients with "stable" HF. New drugs are emerging as arrows in the quiver for clinicians to address the residual risk of HF hospitalization and cardiovascular deaths in patients with WHF. This question-and-answer-based review will discuss the emerging definition of WHF in light of the recent clinical consensus released by the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the new therapeutic approaches to treat WHF and then move on to their timing and safety concerns (i.e., renal profile). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vitamin D emerged as an important prognostic biomarker in heart failure (HF), with currently highly debated therapeutic implications. Several trials on vitamin D supplementation in HF showed improvements in left ventricular (LV) remodeling and function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which did not translate into mid- to long-term beneficial effects regarding physical performance and mortality. We addressed total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), serum albumin, and uric acid (UA) levels, focusing mainly on vitamin D deficiency, as potential markers of LV systolic dysfunction in HF with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, HFmrEF). Seventy patients with LVEF < 50% were comprehensively evaluated using ECG, echocardiography, lung ultrasound (LUS), blood sampling, and the six-minute walk test (6MWT). HRQoL was also assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ). Statistically significant positive correlations were found between LVEF, 25(OH)D, serum UA, and albumin, respectively (p = 0.008, p = 0.009, and p = 0.001). Serum UA (7.4 ± 2.4 vs. 5.7 ± 2.1, p = 0.005), NT-proBNP levels (1090.4 (675.2–2664.9) vs. 759.0 (260.3–1474.8), p = 0.034), and MLHFQ scores (21.0 (14.0–47.0) vs. 14.5 (4.5–25.5), p = 0.012) were significantly higher, whereas 25(OH)D concentrations (17.6 (15.1–28.2) vs. 22.7 (19.5–33.8), p = 0.010) were lower in subjects with severely reduced LVEF. Also, 25(OH)D was independently associated with LVEF in univariate and multiple regression analysis, maintaining its significance even after adjusting for confounders such as age, NT-proBNP, the presence of chronic coronary syndrome, hypertension, and anemia. According to our current findings, 25(OH)D is closely associated with LVEF, further supporting the need to establish correct vitamin D supplementation schemes and dietary interventions in HF. The changes in LVEF, 25(OH)D, serum UA, and albumin levels in HFrEF and HFmrEF indicate a similar pathophysiological background. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Although trials have proven the group‐level effectiveness of various therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), important differences in absolute effectiveness exist between individuals. We developed and validated the LIFEtime‐perspective for Heart Failure (LIFE‐HF) model for the prediction of individual (lifetime) risk and treatment benefit in patients with HFrEF. Methods and results: Cox proportional hazards functions with age as the time scale were developed in the PARADIGM‐HF and ATMOSPHERE trials (n = 15 415). Outcomes were cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF) hospitalization or cardiovascular death, and non‐cardiovascular mortality. Predictors were age, sex, New York Heart Association class, prior HF hospitalization, diabetes mellitus, extracardiac vascular disease, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular ejection fraction, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, and glomerular filtration rate. The functions were combined in life‐tables to predict individual overall and HF hospitalization‐free survival. External validation was performed in the SwedeHF registry, ASIAN‐HF registry, and DAPA‐HF trial (n = 51 286). Calibration of 2‐ to 10‐year risk was adequate, and c‐statistics were 0.65–0.74. An interactive tool was developed combining the model with hazard ratios from trials to allow estimation of an individual's (lifetime) risk and treatment benefit in clinical practice. Applying the tool to the development cohort, combined treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor was estimated to afford a median of 2.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.7–3.7) and 3.7 (IQR 2.4–5.5) additional years of overall and HF hospitalization‐free survival, respectively. Conclusion: The LIFE‐HF model enables estimation of lifelong overall and HF hospitalization‐free survival, and (lifetime) treatment benefit for individual patients with HFrEF. It could serve as a tool to improve the management of HFrEF by facilitating personalized medicine and shared decision‐making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite previous studies showing that patients with low systolic blood pressure (sBP) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) has a poor prognosis, it has few treatment options. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) in HFrEF patients with hypotension. We included 43 consecutive HFrEF patients with sBP < 100 mmHg despite guideline-directed medical therapy for at least 3 months and who received S/V between September 2020 and July 2021. Patients admitted for acute heart failure were excluded and 29 patients were evaluated for safety endpoints. Furthermore, patients who performed non-pharmacological therapy or died within 1 month were excluded, finally, 25 patients were evaluated for efficacy endpoints. The mean initial S/V dose was 53.0 ± 20.5 mg/day and the mean dosage was increased to 84.0 ± 34.5 mg/day in 1 month. Serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values significantly decreased from 2200 [interquartile range (IQR): 1462–3666] pg/ml to 1409 (IQR: 964–2451) pg/ml. (p < 0.0001). No significant change in sBP occurred (pre-sBP: 93.2 ± 4.9 mmHg, post-sBP: 93.4 ± 9.6 mmHg, p = 0.91), and no patients discontinued the S/V due to symptomatic hypotension in 1 month after S/V initiation. S/V can be safely introduced in HFrEF patients with hypotension to reduce serum NT-proBNP values. Thus, S/V may be useful for the treatment of HFrEF patients with hypotension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and comorbid heart failure (HF) with reduced (HFrEF) or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is of clinical importance but a great challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical benefit of the combined radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedure in AF patients complicated with systolic HF. Methods: AF patients with HFrEF or HFmrEF who underwent the combined RFCA and LAAC procedure were prospectively enrolled in the LAACablation registry. The procedural complications and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Another cohort of AF patients with systolic HF who did not undergo either RFCA or LAAC were used for prognosis comparison. Results: Among 802 AF patients who underwent the combined procedure, 65 patients were comorbid with systolic HF (25 with HFrEF and 40 with HFmrEF). The overall procedural complication rate was 9.2%, which was mainly attributed to acute decompensated HF (6.2%). Accompanied with markedly reduced AF burden (from median [25th, 75th percentile]: 100 [100, 100] to 0 [0, 1.2]%, p < 0.001), upward trajectories of cardiac function were observed in 51 (78.4%) patients, showing improvement in New York Heart Classification (p < 0.01), natriuretic peptide levels (from 1492 [809, 3259] to 413 [163, 880] pg/mL, p < 0.001) and left ventricular EF (from 42.6 ± 5.3 to 53.8 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001). During the 27-month follow-up period, death, thromboembolism, major bleeding, and HF rehospitalization were observed in three, one, one, and four patients, respectively. The observed event rates showed a significant reduction compared with the non-procedure AF-HF cohort (n = 138; for composite endpoint: hazard ratio: 2.509, 95% confidence interval: 1.415–4.449, p = 0.002) and with the respective rates predicted by risk scores. Conclusions: Combining RFCA and LAAC achieves acceptable safety and credible long-term efficacy in AF patients with systolic HF. Further randomized studies are warranted in a larger patient cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), i.e., central sleep apnea (CSA) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), affects the prognosis of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The study assessed the relationships between heart chamber size or function and respiratory parameters in patients with HFrEF and various types of SDB. The 84 participants were patients aged 68.3 ± 8.4 years (80% men) with an average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 25.5 ± 6.85% who qualified for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation with or without cardiac resynchronization therapy. SDB, defined by an apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ five events/hour, was diagnosed in 76 patients (90.5%); SDB was severe in 31 (36.9%), moderate in 26 (31.0%), and mild in 19 (22.6%). CSA was the most common type of SDB (64 patients, 76.2%). A direct proportional relationship existed only in the CSA group between LVEF or stroke volume (SV) and AHI (p = 0.02 and p = 0.07), and between LVEF or SV and the percentage of total sleep time spent with hemoglobin oxygen saturation < 90% (p = 0.06 and p = 0.07). In contrast, the OSA group was the only group in which right ventricle size showed a positive relationship with AHI (for basal linear dimension [RVD1] p = 0.06), mean duration of the respiratory event (for RVD1 p = 0.03, for proximal outflow diameter [RVOT proximal] p = 0.009), and maximum duration of respiratory event (for RVD1 p = 0.049, for RVOT proximal p = 0.006). We concluded that in HFrEF patients, SDB severity is related to LV systolic function and SV only in CSA, whereas RV size correlates primarily with apnea/hypopnea episode duration in OSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), individual responses to beta-blockers vary. Candidate gene pharmacogenetic studies yielded significant but inconsistent results, and they may have missed important associations. Our objective was to use an unbiased genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify loci influencing beta-blocker survival benefit in HFrEF patients. Genetic variant × beta-blocker exposure interactions were tested in Cox proportional hazards models for all-cause mortality stratified by self-identified race. The models were adjusted for clinical risk factors and propensity scores. A prospective HFrEF registry (469 black and 459 white patients) was used for discovery, and linkage disequilibrium (LD) clumped variants with a beta-blocker interaction of p < 5 × 10−5, were tested for Bonferroni-corrected validation in a multicenter HFrEF clinical trial (288 black and 579 white patients). A total of 229 and 18 variants in black and white HFrEF patients, respectively, had interactions with beta-blocker exposure at p < 5 × 10−5 upon discovery. After LD-clumping, 100 variants and 4 variants in the black and white patients, respectively, remained for validation but none reached statistical significance. In conclusion, genetic variants of potential interest were identified in a discovery-based GWAS of beta-blocker survival benefit in HFrEF patients, but none were validated in an independent dataset. Larger cohorts or alternative approaches, such as polygenic scores, are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: A substantial portion of heart failure (HF) patients adherent to guideline-directed medical therapies have experienced improved ejection fraction (EF), termed HFimpEF. Glycemic variability (GV) has emerged as a critical cardiometabolic factor. However, the relation between long-term GV and the incidence of HFimpEF is still unclear. Methods: A total of 591 hospitalized HF patients with reduced EF (HFrEF, EF≤ 40%) admitted from January 2013 to December 2020 were consecutively enrolled. Repeat echocardiograms were performed at baseline and after around 12 months. The incidence of HFimpEF, defined as (1) an absolute EF improvement ≥10% and (2) a second EF > 40% and its association with long-term fasting plasma glucose (FPG) variability were analyzed. Results: During a mean follow-up of 12.2 ± 0.6 months, 218 (42.0%) patients developed HFimpEF. Multivariate analysis showed FPG variability was independently associated with the incidence of HFimpEF after adjustment for baseline HbA1c, mean FPG during follow-up and other traditional risk factors (odds ratio [OR] for highest vs. lowest quartile of CV of FPG: 0.487 [95% CI 0.257~0.910]). Evaluation of GV by alternative measures yielded similar results. Subgroup analysis revealed that long-term GV was associated with HFimpEF irrespective of glycemic levels and diabetic conditions. Conclusions: This study reveals that greater FPG variability is associated with compromised development of HFimpEF. A more stable control of glycemic levels might provide favorable effects on myocardial functional recovery in HF patients even without diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Whether electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements predict mortality in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is unknown. Methods and results: We studied 4880 patients from the Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (VICTORIA) trial with a baseline 12‐lead ECG. Associations between ECG measurements and mortality were estimated as hazard ratios (HR) and adjusted for the Meta‐Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score, N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, and index event. Select interactions between ECG measurements, patient characteristics and mortality were examined. Over a median of 10.8 months, there were 824 cardiovascular (CV) deaths (214 sudden) and 1005 all‐cause deaths. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 60–76), 24% were women, median ejection fraction was 30% (IQR 23–35), 41% had New York Heart Association class III/IV, and median MAGGIC score was 24 (IQR 19–28). After multivariable adjustment, significant associations existed between heart rate (per 5 bpm: HR 1.02), QRS duration (per 10 ms: HR 1.02), absence of left ventricular hypertrophy (HR 0.64) and CV death, and similarly so with all‐cause death (HR 1.02; HR 1.02; HR 0.61, respectively). Contiguous pathologic Q waves were significantly associated with sudden death (HR 1.46), and right ventricular hypertrophy with all‐cause death (HR 1.44). The only sex‐based interaction observed was for pathologic Q waves on CV (men: HR 1.05; women: HR 1.64, pinteraction = 0.024) and all‐cause death (men: HR 0.99; women: HR 1.57; pinteraction = 0.010). Whereas sudden death doubled in females, it did not differ among males (male: HR 1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87–1.79; female: HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.23–5.06; pinteraction = 0.141). Conclusion: Routine ECG measurements provide additional prognostication of mortality in high‐risk HFrEF patients, particularly in women with contiguous pathologic Q waves. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Frail older adults may be less likely to receive guideline‐directed medical therapy (GDMT)—renin‐angiotensin blockers, beta‐blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists—for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to examine the uptake of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and GDMT in frail older adults with HFrEF. Methods: Using 2015–2019 Medicare data, we estimated the proportion of beneficiaries with HFrEF receiving ARNI and GDMT each year by frailty status, defined by a claims‐based frailty index. Logistic regression was used to identify clinical characteristics associated with ARNI initiation. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association of GDMT use in 2015 and death or heart failure hospitalization in 2016–2019. Results: Among 147,506–180,386 beneficiaries with HFrEF (mean age: 77 years; 27% women; 42.6–49.1% frail) in 2015–2019, the proportion of patients receiving ARNI increased in both non‐frail (0.4%–16.4%) and frail (0.3%–13.7%) patients (p for yearly‐trend‐by‐frailty = 0.970). Among those not receiving a renin‐angiotensin system blocker, patients with age ≥ 85 years (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.89 [0.80–0.99]), dementia (0.88 [0.81–0.96]), and frailty (0.87 [0.81–0.94]) were less likely to initiate ARNI. The proportion of patients receiving all 3 GDMT classes increased in non‐frail patients (22.0%–27.0%) but changed minimally in frail patients (19.6%–21.8%). Regardless of frailty status, treatment with at least 1 class of GDMT was associated with lower death or heart failure hospitalization than no GDMT medications (hazard ratio [95% CI], 0.94 [0.91–0.97], 0.92 [0.89–0.94], 0.94 [0.91–0.97] for 1, 2, and 3 classes, respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggest an evidence‐practice gap in the use of ARNI and GDMT in Medicare beneficiaries with HFrEF, particularly those with frailty. Efforts to narrow this gap are needed to reduce the burden of HFrEF in older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cardiología (18855857) is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Sacubitril‐valsartan (SV) monotherapy has been shown to help patients with Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but whether adding a sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) improves treatment results even more is unknown. Hypothesis: The goal of this study was to look at the efficacy of SV with additional SGLT2i in HFrEF patients. Methods: For this study, several databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, were searched. A coherent search approach was used for data extraction. Review Manager 5.2 and MedCalc were used for conducting the meta‐analysis and bias analysis. A meta‐regression study correlates patient mean age with primary and secondary outcomes. Results: Seven trials totaling 16 100 patients were included in this meta‐analysis. All‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and improvement in mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were the study's major objectives, while hospitalization for heart failure (HF) was calculated to be its secondary outcome. Our analysis showed that HFrEF patients receiving the combination of SV and SGLT2i had better treatment outcomes than the standard SV monotherapy, with risk ratios of 0.76 (0.65–0.88) for all‐cause mortality, 0.65 (0.49–0.86) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.41 (−0.59 to 3.42) for change in mean LVEF, and 0.80 (0.64–1.01) for hospitalization for HF. According to the regression analysis, older HFrEF patients have higher rates of hospitalization, cardiovascular disease, and overall death. Conclusions: The combination of SV and SGLT2i may have a greater cardiovascular protective effect and minimize the risk of death or hospitalization due to heart failure in HFrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Approximately 1/3 of patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) are discharged with persistent congestion. Worsening renal function (WRF) occurs in approximately 50% of patients hospitalized for ADHF and the combination of WRF and persistent congestion are associated with higher risk of mortality and HF readmissions. Methods: We designed a multicenter, prospective registry to describe current treatments and outcomes for patients hospitalized with ADHF complicated by WRF (defined as a creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL) and persistent congestion at 96 h. Study participants were followed during the hospitalization and through 90‐day post‐discharge. Hospitalization costs were analyzed in an economic substudy. Results: We enrolled 237 patients hospitalized with ADHF, who also had WRF and persistent congestion. Among these, the average age was 66 ± 13 years and 61% had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%. Mean baseline creatinine was 1.7 ± 0.7 mg/dL. Patients with persistent congestion had a high burden of clinical events during the index hospitalization (7.6% intensive care unit transfer, 2.1% intubation, 1.7% left ventricular assist device implantation, and 0.8% dialysis). At 90‐day follow‐up, 33% of patients were readmitted for ADHF or died. Outcomes and costs were similar between patients with reduced and preserved LVEF. Conclusions: Many patients admitted with ADHF have WRF and persistent congestion despite diuresis and are at high risk for adverse events during hospitalization and early follow‐up. Novel treatment strategies are urgently needed for this high‐risk population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Not much is known about the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on echocardiographic parameters of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We prospectively included 59 outpatients with HFrEF: 41 patients received SGLT2i with OMT (SGLT2i+ group), whereas eighteen patients received OMT without SGLT2i (SGLT2i− group). Myocardial work index (MWI), 3D ejection fraction (3D LVEF), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were measured at baseline and after 3 months following treatment. At 3-month follow-up, the SGLT2i+ group showed significantly greater improvement in MWI than the SGLT2i− group. In both groups, there was a significant improvement in 3D LVEF and LV GLS, circulating NT-proBNP levels, and NYHA functional class, with significantly greater improvement in the SGLT2i+ group. In conclusion, the addition of SGLT2i to fully optimized background medical therapy resulted in a greater improvement of LV systolic function among outpatients with HFrEF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) can be estimated from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We aimed to investigate whether CMR‐derived LVFP is associated with signs, symptoms, and prognosis in patients with recently diagnosed heart failure (HF). Methods and results: This study recruited 454 patients diagnosed with HF who underwent same‐day CMR and clinical assessment between February 2018 and January 2020. CMR‐derived LVFP was calculated, as previously, from long‐ and short‐axis cines. CMR‐derived LVFP association with symptoms and signs of HF was investigated. Patients were followed for median 2.9 years (interquartile range 1.5–3.6 years) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization, non‐fatal stroke, and non‐fatal myocardial infarction. The mean age was 62 ± 13 years, 36% were female (n = 163), and 30% (n = 135) had raised LVFP. Forty‐seven per cent of patients had an ejection fraction < 40% during CMR assessment. Patients with raised LVFP were more likely to have pleural effusions [hazard ratio (HR) 3.2, P = 0.003], orthopnoea (HR 2.0, P = 0.008), lower limb oedema (HR 1.7, P = 0.04), and breathlessness (HR 1.7, P = 0.01). Raised CMR‐derived LVFP was associated with a four‐fold risk of HF hospitalization (HR 4.0, P < 0.0001) and a three‐fold risk of MACE (HR 3.1, P < 0.0001). In the multivariable model, raised CMR‐derived LVFP was independently associated with HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 3.8, P = 0.0001) and MACE (adjusted HR 3.0, P = 0.0001). Conclusions: Raised CMR‐derived LVFP is strongly associated with symptoms and signs of HF. In addition, raised CMR‐derived LVFP is independently associated with subsequent HF hospitalization and MACE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: A novel tool for the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) systo‐diastolic function through echo‐derived haemodynamic forces (HDFs) has been recently proposed. The present study aimed to assess the predictive value of HDFs on (i) 6 month treatment response to sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients and (ii) cardiovascular events. Methods and results: Eighty‐nine consecutive HFrEF patients [70% males, 65 ± 9 years, LV ejection fraction (LVEF) 27 ± 7%] initiating sacubitril/valsartan underwent clinical, laboratory, ultrasound and cardiopulmonary exercise testing evaluations. Patients experiencing no adverse events and showing ≥50% reduction in plasma N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide and/or ≥10% LVEF increase over 6 months were considered responders. Patients were followed up for the composite endpoint of HF‐related hospitalisation, atrial fibrillation and cardiovascular death. Forty‐five (51%) patients were responders. Among baseline variables, only HDF‐derived whole cardiac cycle LV strength (wLVS) was higher in responders (4.4 ± 1.3 vs. 3.6 ± 1.2; p = 0.01). wLVS was also the only independent predictor of sacubitril/valsartan response at multivariable logistic regression analysis [odds ratio 1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10–1.67], with good accuracy at receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis [optimal cutpoint: ≥3.7%; area under the curve (AUC) = 0.736]. During a 33 month (23–41) median follow‐up, a wLVS increase after 6 months (ΔwLVS) showed a high discrimination ability at time‐dependent ROC analysis (optimal cut‐off: ≥0.5%; AUC = 0.811), stratified prognosis (log‐rank p < 0.0001) and remained an independent predictor for the composite endpoint (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.61–0.95; p < 0.01), after adjusting for clinical and instrumental variables. Conclusions: HDF analysis predicts sacubitril/valsartan response and might optimise decision‐making in HFrEF patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Necrobiotic xanthogranuloma (NXG) is a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis and multisystem disorder. Low level of HDL cholesterol associated with a systemic inflammatory profile, which may result from the interaction of monoclonal immunoglobulin and lipoproteins, is a characteristic feature. There is no evidence of NXG-associated large-vessel vasculitis, nor are there any established treatments, although chemotherapy for comorbid multiple myeloma is most often administered. Case summary We describe a case of a 53-year-old male with a first history of heart failure with impaired systolic function. He presented with orbital xanthomas and multiple subcutaneous nodules, and laboratory examination showed elevated levels of C-reactive protein, low HDL, and paraproteinemia. A constellation of these clinical features and pathological findings of skin biopsy led to the diagnosis of NXG. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) confirmed increased uptake in the aorta and bilateral common carotid arteries. He began prednisolone treatment with reference to treatment for large-vessel vasculitis. After the treatment, C-reactive protein immediately decreased with markedly increased levels of apolipoprotein A1 (Apo-A1) and HDL. Systolic dysfunction was restored at 6-month follow-up. The patient has not experienced heart failure for 5 years after treatment, and the follow-up PET/CT demonstrated resolution of vascular inflammation. Discussion This is the first report of NXG-associated large-vessel vasculitis. Low-dose prednisolone may benefit for NXG-associated vasculitis and cardiomyopathy. HDL, Apo-A1, and C-reactive protein levels may be useful for monitoring the activity of NXG, and PET/CT was a valuable diagnostic tool for NXG-associated vasculitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure is a significant public health concern characterized by notable rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite the presence of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), its utilization remains inadequate. This practical recommendation paper focuses on the utilization of angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) as a pivotal treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF). The recommendations presented in this paper have been developed by a group of cardiologists in India who convened six advisory board meetings to discuss the utilization of ARNI in the management of heart failure. The paper emphasizes the importance of accurate biomarkers for diagnosing heart failure, particularly N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), which are commonly used. Additionally, the paper advocates the use of imaging, specifically echocardiography, in diagnosing and monitoring heart failure patients. Moreover, the paper highlights the role of ARNI in heart failure management, with numerous clinical trials that have demonstrated its effectiveness in reducing cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, enhancing quality of life, and diminishing the risk of ventricular arrhythmias. This practical recommendation paper offers valuable insights into the utilization of ARNI in the management of heart failure, aiming to enhance the implementation of GDMT and ultimately alleviate the burden of heart failure on society. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce mortality/morbidity in heart failure (HF). We explored the implementation of SGLT2i over time, and patient characteristics associated with their use, in a large, nationwide population with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results: Patients with HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%), no type 1 diabetes, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <20 ml/min/1.73 m2 and/or on dialysis, registered in the Swedish HF Registry between 1 November 2020 and 5 August 2022 were included. Independent predictors of use were investigated by multivariable logistic regressions. Of 8192 patients, 37% received SGLT2i. Use increased overall from 20.5% to 59.0% over time, from 46.2% and 12.5% to 69.8% and 55.4% in patients with and without type 2 diabetes, from 14.7% and 22.3% to 58.0% and 59.8% in eGFR <60 versus ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2, from 21.0% and 18.9% to 61.6% and 52.0% in males versus females, from 24.2% and 18.0% to 60.8% and 57.7% in patients with versus without recent HF hospitalization, from 26.1% and 19.8% to 54.7% and 59.6% in inpatients versus outpatients, and from 20.2% and 21.2% to 59.2% and 58.7% in those with HF duration <6 versus ≥6 months, respectively. Important characteristics associated with SGLT2i use were male sex, recent HF hospitalization, specialized HF follow‐up, lower ejection fraction, type 2 diabetes, higher education level, use of other HF/cardiovascular interventions. Older age, higher blood pressure, atrial fibrillation and anaemia were associated with less use. Discontinuation rate at 6 and 12 months was 13.1% and 20.0%, respectively. Conclusions: Use of SGLT2i increased three‐fold over 2 years. Although this indicates a more rapid translation of trial results and guidelines into clinical practice compared to previous HF drugs, further efforts are advocated to complete the implementation process while avoiding inequities across different patient subgroups and discontinuations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) is a novel conduction system pacing method to achieve effective physiological pacing and an alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We conduted this meta‐analysis and systemic review to review current data comparing BVP and LBBP in patients with HFrEF and indications for CRT. Methods: We searched PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from the inception of the database to November 2022. All studies that compared LBBP with BVP in patients with HFrEF and indications for CRT were included. Two reviewers performed study selection, data abstraction, and risk of bias assessment. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with the Mantel–Haenszel method and mean difference (MD) with inverse variance using random effect models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 index, with I2 > 50% indicating significant heterogeneity. Results: Ten studies (9 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial; 616 patients; 15 centers) published between 2020 and 2022 were included. We observed a shorter fluoroscopy time (MD: 9.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.49–14.87, I2 = 95%, p <.01, minutes) as well as a shorter procedural time (MD 33.68, 95% CI: 17.80–49.55, I2 = 73%, p <.01, minutes) during the implantation of LBBP CRT compared to conventional BVP CRT. LBBP was shown to have a greater reduction in QRS duration (MD 25.13, 95% CI: 20.06–30.20, I2 = 51%, p <.01, milliseconds), a greater left ventricular ejection fraction improvement (MD: 5.80, 95% CI: 4.81–6.78, I2 = 0%, p <.01, percentage), and a greater left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter reduction (MD: 2.11, 95% CI: 0.12–4.10, I2 = 18%, p =.04, millimeter). There was a greater improvement in New York Heart Association function class with LBBP (MD: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.05–0.68, I2 = 61%, p =.02). LBBP was also associated with a lower risk of a composite of heart failure hospitalizations (HFH) and all‐cause mortality (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25–0.90, I2 = 0%, p =.02) driven by reduced HFH (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.19–0.82, I2 = 0%, p =.01). However, all‐cause mortality rates were low in both groups (1.52% vs. 1.13%) and similar (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.21–4.68, I2 = 0%, p =.87). Conclusion: This meta‐analysis of primarily nonrandomized studies suggests that LBBP is associated with a greater improvement in left ventricular systolic function and a lower rate of HFH compared to BVP. There was uniformity of these findings in all of the included studies. However, it would be premature to conclude based solely on the current meta‐analysis alone, given the limitations stated. Dedicated, well‐designed, randomized controlled trials and observational studies are needed to elucidate better the comparative long‐term efficacy and safety of LBBP CRT versus BIV CRT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: We examined whether the primary composite outcome (cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization) was related to differences in background use and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction), a randomized trial of vericiguat versus placebo. METHODS: We evaluated the adherence to guideline use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. We assessed basic adherence; indication-corrected adherence accounting for guideline indications and contraindications; and dosecorrected adherence (indication-corrected adherence+=50% of drug dose target). Associations between study treatment and the primary composite outcome according to the adherence to guidelines were assessed using multivariable adjustment; adjusted hazard ratios with 95% CIs and Pinteraction are reported. RESULTS: Of 5050 patients, 5040 (99.8%) had medication data at baseline. For angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin-receptor blockers, and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, basic adherence to guidelines was 87.4%, indication-corrected was 95.7%, and dose-corrected was 50.9%. For beta-blockers, basic adherence was 93.1%, indicationcorrected was 96.2%, and dose-corrected was 45.4%. For mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, basic adherence was 70.3%, indication-corrected was 87.1%, and dose-corrected was 82.2%. For triple therapy (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors+beta-blocker+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist), basic adherence was 59.7%, indication-corrected was 83.3%, and dose-corrected was 25.5%. Using basic or dose-corrected adherence, the treatment effect of vericiguat was consistent across adherence to guidelines groups, with or without multivariable adjustment with no treatment heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients in VICTORIA were well treated with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction medications. The efficacy of vericiguat was consistent across background therapy with very high adherence to guidelines accounting for patient-level indications, contraindications, and tolerance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Quantitative data regarding the impact of exercise hemodynamics on functional capacity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are lacking. • Patients with HFrEF experience marked increases in right- and left-sided filling pressures as well as pulmonary arterial pressures during exercise, in addition to abnormal ventilatory parameters of exercise. Exertional dyspnea is a cardinal manifestation of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but quantitative data regarding exertional hemodynamics are lacking. We sought to characterize exertional cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in patients with HFrEF. We studied 35 patients with HFrEF (59 ± 12 years old, 30 males) who completed invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Data were collected at rest, at submaximal exercise and at peak effort on upright cycle ergometry. Cardiovascular and pulmonary vascular hemodynamics were recorded. Fick cardiac output (Qc) was determined. Hemodynamic predictors of peak oxygen uptake (VO 2) were identified. Left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac index were 23% ± 8% and 2.9 ± 1.1 L/min/m2, respectively. Peak VO 2 was 11.8 ± 3.3 mL/kg/min, and the ventilatory efficiency slope was 53 ± 13. Right atrial pressure increased from rest to peak exercise (4 ± 5 vs 7 ± 6 mmHg,). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure increased from rest to peak exercise (27 ± 13 vs 38 ± 14 mmHg). Pulmonary artery pulsatility index increased from rest to peak exercise, while pulmonary arterial capacitance and pulmonary vascular resistance declined. Patients with HFrEF suffer from marked increases in filling pressures during exercise. These findings provide new insight into cardiopulmonary abnormalities contributing to impairments in exercise capacity in this population. clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03078972 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Hungarian Medical Journal / Orvosi Hetilap is the property of Akademiai Kiado and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Heart failure is a major public health issue with a prevalence of about 26 million people worldwide. Reduced nitric oxide availability, lower soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activity, and decreased cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production are the causes of HF's development. Vericiguat prescribed under the brand name Verquvo was approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in January 2021. It is a novel agent and the first sGC stimulator which helps to treat patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Objective: The mechanism of action (cGMP pathway) of vericiguat, its clinical trials, its use in the treatment of heart failure, and its possible future aspects in therapeutic recommendations are all covered in this review. It will also raise awareness amongst healthcare professionals about the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, dosing, administration, and drug-related problems of this new drug. Methods: Various databases for drug review were used in this review like PubMed, Medline, Google scholar, Drug bank, U.S. FDA, Medscape, and European society of cardiology guidelines. A total of 58 articles were screened out of which 39 articles were included in this review. Results: This review discusses vericiguat's mechanism of action (cGMP pathway), clinical studies, application in the treatment of heart failure, and potential future considerations in therapeutic recommendations. It will also educate healthcare professionals about the new drug's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, dose, administration, and drug-related problems. Conclusion: After hospitalization for HFrEF, the 5-year survival rate is just 25%, and disease morbidity and death are still significant. As adjunctive therapy for individuals with heart failure and a low ejection fraction, vericiguat has a moderate level of effectiveness. Vericiguat's efficacy as an adjunct therapy to different drugs used to cure HF has to be further investigated. Vericiguat's safety and dosage in patients who have severe renal or hepatic illness need to be studied further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a cornerstone of risk stratification in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there is a paucity of evidence on its predictive power in older patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic power of current heart transplantation (HTx) listing criteria in HFrEF stratified according to age groups. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients with HFrEF undergoing CPET between 2009 and 2018 were followed-up for cardiac death and urgent HTx. Results: CPET was performed in 458 patients with HFrEF. The composite endpoint occurred in 16.8% of patients ≤50 years vs. 14.1% of patients ≥50 years in a 36-month follow-up. Peak VO2 (pVO2), VE/VCO2 slope and percentage of predicted pVO2 were strong independent predictors of outcomes. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation thresholds of pVO2 ≤ 12 mL/kg/min (≤14 if intolerant to β-blockers), VE/VCO2 slope > 35 and percentage of predicted pVO2 ≤ 50% presented a higher overall diagnostic effectiveness in younger patients (≤50 years). Specific thresholds for each age subgroup outperformed the traditional cut-offs. Conclusions: Personalized age-specific thresholds may contribute to an accurate risk stratification in HFrEF. Further studies are needed to address the gap in evidence between younger and older patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ObjectiveMethamphetamine use is associated with systolic dysfunction, pulmonary arterial hypertension and may also be associated with diastolic dysfunction. The impact of methamphetamine cessation on methamphetamine-associated heart failure (MethHF) remains poorly characterised. We aimed to longitudinally characterise methamphetamine-associated heart failure patients with reduced (METHrEF) and preserved (METHpEF) left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and evaluate the relationship between methamphetamine cessation and clinical outcomes.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study, and reviewed medical records of patients with METHrEF, METHpEF and heart failure controls without methamphetamine use. Echocardiographic variables were recorded for up to 12 months, with clinical follow-up extending to 24 months.ResultsAmong METHrEF patients (n=28, mean age 51±9 years, 82.1% male), cessation was associated with improvement in EF (+10.6±13.1%, p=0.009) and fewer heart failure admissions per year compared with continued use (median 0.0, IQR 0.0-1.0 vs median 2.0, IQR 1.0-3.0, p=0.039). METHpEF patients (n=28, mean age 50±8 years, 60.7% male) had higher baseline right ventricular systolic pressure (median 53.44, IQR 43.70-84.00 vs median 36.64, IQR 29.44-45.95, p=0.011), and lower lateral E/E' ratio (8.1±3.6 vs 11.2±4., p

BackgroundIndependent associations between cardiovascular risk factor exposures during midlife and later life development of heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) versus reduced EF (HFrEF) have not been previously studied.MethodsWe pooled data from 4 US cohort studies (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, Cardiovascular Health, Health , Aging and Body Composition, and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) and imputed annual risk factor trajectories for body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and glucose starting from age 40 years. Time-weighted average exposures to each risk factor during midlife and later life were calculated and analyzed for associations with the development of HFpEF or HFrEF.ResultsA total of 23,861 participants were included (mean age at first in-person visit, 61.8 ±1 0.2 years; 56.6% female). During a median follow-up of 12 years, there were 3666 incident HF events, of which 51% had EF measured, including 934 with HFpEF and 739 with HFrEF. A high midlife systolic blood pressure and low midlife high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were associated with HFrEF, and a high midlife body mass index, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and glucose were associated with HFpEF. After adjusting for later life exposures, only midlife pulse pressure remained independently associated with HFpEF.ConclusionsMidlife exposure to cardiovascular risk factors are differentially associated with HFrEF and HFpEF later in life. Having a higher pulse pressure during midlife is associated with a greater risk for HFpEF but not HFrEF, independent of later life exposures.

Background. Thyroid hormones play a fundamental role in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular diseases are among the most common diseases worldwide, causing a significant percentage of mortality, hospitalizations, and disability. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of hypothyroidism on the course of atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries and major cardiovascular events in patients with heart fai­lure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction after myocardial revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Materials and methods. This prospective observational one-center study included 103 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, with and without hypothyroidism who underwent PCI. The result of revascularization was evaluated within 2 years. Inclusion criteria: age over 18 years, coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40 %. Results. Patients with hypothyroidism had a worse lipid profile and, as expected, a higher baseline thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). According to echocardiography, patients with hypothyroidism had thickening of the left ventricular myocardium walls, which is indicated by a probable increase in the dimensions of the left ventricular posterior wall (11.40 ± 0.98 mm; p

Abstract Background Although the angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor sacubitril-valsartan has demonstrated a valuable effect on cardiac function in patients with heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, the effect of this agent in hemodialysis patients is not well known. Case presentation Sacubitril-valsartan was administered to two anuric hemodialysis patients, an 81-year-old woman and a 79-year-old man, after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Following sacubitril-valsartan administration, the two patients’ N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels decreased from 110,373 to 47,742 and 22,723 to 7692 pg/mL within one month, respectively, and were sustained within the lower levels thereafter. Although the patients’ left ventricular ejection fractions were 40.0% and 28.4%, respectively, these values did not change at seven and four months after sacubitril-valsartan administration (41.0% and 30.0%, respectively) but increased gradually to 56.6% and 54.9% at 11 and 13 months, respectively, and were sustained at the same levels thereafter. Conclusions Long-term sacubitril-valsartan administration can improve cardiac function in hemodialysis patients with a reduced ejection fraction.

Abstract Aims The relationship between diabetic microvascular complications and the incidence of two types of heart failure—heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]

Abstract Aims Several patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) do not receive renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors at the recommended dose or at all, frequently due to actual or feared hyperkalaemia. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is an orally administered non‐absorbed intestinal potassium binder proven to lower serum potassium concentrations. Methods and results PRIORITIZE‐HF was an international, multicentre, parallel‐group, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study to evaluate the benefits and risks of using SZC to intensify RAAS inhibitor therapy. Patients with symptomatic HFrEF were eligible and randomly assigned to receive SZC 5 g or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Doses of study medication and RAAS inhibitors were titrated during the treatment period. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients at 12 weeks in the following categories: (i) any RAAS inhibitor at less than target dose, and no MRA; (ii) any RAAS inhibitor at target dose and no MRA; (ii) MRA at less than target dose; and (iv) MRA at target dose. Due to challenges in participant management related to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the study was prematurely terminated with 182 randomized patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of patients by RAAS inhibitor treatment categories at 3 months (P = 0.43). The proportion of patients at target MRA dose was numerically higher in the SZC group (56.4%) compared with the placebo group (47.0%). Overall, SZC was well tolerated. Conclusions PRIORITIZE‐HF was terminated prematurely due to COVID‐19 and did not demonstrate a statistically significant increase in the intensity of RAAS inhibitor therapies with the potassium‐reducing agent SZC compared with placebo.

Abstract Aims Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a disease with high mortality and morbidity. Recent positive inotropic drug developments focused on cardiac myofilaments, that is, direct activators of the myosin molecule and Ca2+ sensitizers for patients with advanced HFrEF. Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM) is the first direct myosin activator with promising results in clinical studies. Here, we aimed to elucidate the cellular mechanisms of the positive inotropic effect of OM in a comparative in vitro investigation where Ca2+‐sensitizing positive inotropic agents with distinct mechanisms of action [EMD 53998 (EMD), which also docks on the myosin molecule, and levosimendan (Levo), which binds to troponin C] were included. Methods Enzymatically isolated canine cardiomyocytes with intact cell membranes were loaded with Fura‐2AM, a Ca2+‐sensitive, ratiometric, fluorescent dye. Changes in sarcomere length (SL) and intracellular Ca2+ concentration were recorded in parallel at room temperature, whereas cardiomyocyte contractions were evoked by field stimulation at 0.1 Hz in the presence of different OM, EMD, or Levo concentrations. Results SL was reduced by about 23% or 9% in the presence of 1 μM OM or 1 μM EMD in the absence of electrical stimulation, whereas 1 μM Levo had no effect on resting SL. Fractional sarcomere shortening was increased by 1 μM EMD or 1 μM Levo to about 152%, but only to about 128% in the presence of 0.03 μM OM. At higher OM concentrations, no significant increase in fractional sarcomere shortening could be recorded. Contraction durations largely increased, whereas the kinetics of contractions and relaxations decreased with increasing OM concentrations. One‐micromole EMD or 1 μM Levo had no effects on contraction durations. One‐micromole Levo, but not 1 μM EMD, accelerated the kinetics of cardiomyocyte contractions and relaxations. Ca2+ transient amplitudes were unaffected by all treatments. Conclusions Our data revealed major distinctions between the cellular effects of myofilament targeted agents (OM, EMD, or Levo) depending on their target proteins and binding sites, although they were compatible with the involvement of Ca2+‐sensitizing mechanisms for all three drugs. Significant part of the cardiotonic effect of OM relates to the prolongation of systolic contraction in combination with its Ca2+‐sensitizing effect.

Abstract Aims Hyperkalaemia is observed frequently in heart failure (HF) patients and is associated with an impaired prognosis and underuse of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs). However, the effects of serum potassium on prescription of the full guideline recommended daily dose of 50 mg in real‐world daily practice are unknown. Therefore, we investigated serum potassium and its association with the prescribed MRA dose in a large cohort of chronic HF patients. Methods and results A total of 5346 patients with chronic HF with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% from 34 Dutch outpatient HF clinics between 2013 and 2016 were analysed on serum potassium and MRA (spironolactone and eplenerone) dose. Data were stratified by potassium as a serum potassium level 5.0 mmol/L. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between serum potassium and MRA dose and to adjust for potential confounders. Mean serum potassium was 4.4 ± 0.5 mmol/L and hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >5.0 mmol/L) was present in 399 patients (7.5%). MRA was used in 3091 patients (58.1%). Patients with hyperkalaemia significantly less often received ≥100% of the target dose (50 mg) compared with patients with a serum potassium between 4.0–5.0 mmol/L and

Heart failure and mental health conditions frequently coexist and have a negative impact on health-related quality of life and prognosis. We aimed to evaluate depression and anxiety symptoms and to determine the association between psychological distress and cardiac parameters in heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction. A total of 43 patients (33 male, mean age 64 ± 10 years) with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (29 with HFrEF, 14 with HFmrEF) underwent comprehensive echocardiographic evaluation. All study participants completed questionnaires for the assessment of depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), and health-related quality of life (MLHFQ). Ten (34%) patients with HFrEF and two (14%) participants with HFmrEF had moderate-to-severe depression symptoms. Significant anxiety symptoms were more frequent in HFrEF (10 vs. 2 patients; 34% vs. 14%). Poor quality of life was also more common among patients with HFrEF (17 vs. 5 patients; 59% vs. 36%), showing higher MLHFQ scores (p = 0.009). Moreover, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and MLHFQ scores showed significant correlations between NYHA class severity and the presence of peripheral edema. The symptoms of dyspnea correlated with both PHQ-9 and MLHFQ scores. Significant correlations were observed between MLHFQ scores and a large number of clinical features, such as exercise capacity, 6MWT distance, the need for furosemide, echocardiographic parameters (LVEDVI, LVESVI, LVEF, LVGLS, SVI), and laboratory variables (albumin, GFR, NT-proBNP). In the multiple linear regression analysis, dyspnea proved to be a significant predictor of higher PHQ-9 and MLHFQ scores, even after adjusting for potential confounders. High symptom burden due to psychological distress is common among patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF. More efficient control of congestion may improve depression, anxiety symptoms, and health-related quality of life.

Background: The data on incidence of recovered Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and outcome in patients with non ischemic systolic heart failure is limited. We report the incidence, determinants and mortality in patients with recovered LVEF. Methods: The 369 patients with HFrEF with LVEF of less than 40% of non ischemic etiology with available follow up echocardiography study at one year were enrolled. The baseline data of clinical characteristics and treatment was recorded prospectively and were followed up annually for mean of 3.6 years (range 2 to 5 years) to record all cause death and LVEF measured echocardiographically. The recovered, partially recovered and no recovery of LVEF was defined based on increase in LVEF to 50% and more, 41% to 49% and to persistently depressed LVEF to 40% or lower respectively. Results: The LVEF recovered in 36.5%% of the cohort at 5 years. The rate of recovery of LVEF was slower in patients with no recovery of LVEF at one year compared to cohort with partially recovered LVEF (18% vs.53%) at five year. The Baseline LVEF was significantly associated with recovered LVEF, odd ratio (95% C.I.) 1.09(1.04, 1.14). The cumulative mortality at five years was significantly lower in cohort with recovered LVEF (18.1% vs. 57.1%). Conclusions: One third of the patients had recovered LVEF and was significantly associated with baseline LVEF and lower mortality rate.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown improvement in hard clinical end points when catheter ablation (CA) is employed as a management strategy for certain atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data, however, exist in this realm outside the controlled clinical trial settings. We sought to determine real-world data on mortality and complications after utilization of CA in such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were derived from National Inpatient Sample from January 2008 to August 2015. Patients were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared among HFrEF and AF patients undergoing CA or not. Propensity matching was done to mitigate selection bias and balance confounding variables. Various CA related complications were assessed. Logistic regression was done to determine predictors of mortality in our study cohort. A total of 2,569,919 patients were analyzed and a total of 7773 patients underwent CA. Mortality was significantly better in CA group in both unmatched (1.2% vs. 4.9%, p < 0.01) and propensity matched cohorts (1.2% vs. 3.6%, p < 0.01). Overall complication rate was 10.2% in CA cohort and primarily driven by cardiac and neurological etiologies. In regression analysis, CA remained a strong predictor of reduced mortality (OR 0.301, 95% CI 0.184-0.494). CONCLUSIONS: CA is associated with improved mortality in admitted AF patients with concomitant HFrEF. Overall complication rate after CA was modest at 10.2%. Consideration can be given to the utilization of this therapeutic modality in hospitalized AF patients with concomitant HFrEF.

Background and Objectives: In this study, we aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) for all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Materials and Methods: In total, 404 chronic HFrEF patients were included in this observational and retrospective study. The CAR value of each patient included in this analysis was calculated. We stratified the study population into tertiles (T1, T2, and T3) according to CAR values. The primary outcome of the analysis was to determine all-cause mortality. Results: The median follow-up period in our study was 30 months. In the follow-up, 162 (40%) patients died. The median value of CAR was higher in patients who did not survive during the follow-up [6.7 (IQR = 1.6–20.4) vs. 0.6 (IQR = 0.1–2.6), p < 0.001]. In addition, patients in the T3 tertile (patients with the highest CAR) had a higher rate of all-cause mortality [n = 90 cases (66.2%), p < 0.001]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CAR was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with HFrEF (hazard ratio: 1.852, 95% confidence interval: 1.124–2.581, p = 0.005). In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cut-off value of CAR was >2.78, with a sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 76%. Furthermore, older age, elevated N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and absence of a cardiac device were also independently associated with all-cause death in HFrEF patients after 2.5 years of follow-up. Conclusions: The present study revealed that CAR independently predicts long-term mortality in chronic HFrEF patients. CAR may be used to predict mortality among these patients as a simple and easily obtainable inflammatory marker.