151. A meta‐analysis of postoperative wound complications at the surgical site in prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic surgery.
- Author
-
Su, Xinyuan, Dai, Zhihong, Zhao, Haolin, Ji, Mingfeng, and Liu, Zhiyu
- Subjects
PREVENTION of surgical complications ,SURGICAL robots ,LAPAROSCOPIC surgery ,PROSTATE tumors ,SEVERITY of illness index ,META-analysis ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,DECISION making in clinical medicine ,PROSTATECTOMY ,SURGICAL complications ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,ODDS ratio ,MEDLINE ,MEDICAL databases ,SURGICAL site infections ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,DATA analysis software ,ONLINE information services - Abstract
This meta‐analysis critically evaluates the role of robotic surgery in reducing postoperative wound complications in prostate cancer patients, comparing it with traditional open and laparoscopic approaches. Our extensive literature search resulted in 9 studies comprising 2063 patients. The results highlighted a significant reduction in the incidence of wound complications, with an 84% heterogeneity index and a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.49 (95% Confidence Intervals: 0.42 to 0.58, p < 0.01) in favour of robotic surgery. Additionally, a notable decrease in wound infection rates was observed, marked by a 94% heterogeneity index and a SMD of 0.26 (95% CIs: 0.19 to 0.35, p < 0.01). A considerable reduction in wound dehiscence events was also noted, particularly in a subset of studies, reflecting a 70% heterogeneity index and a SMD of 0.23 (95% CIs: 0.12 to 0.45, p < 0.01). These findings suggest that robotic surgery may offer significant advantages in managing wound‐related outcomes in prostate cancer surgeries. However, the variability among the studies warrants cautious interpretation of the results and underscores the need for more targeted research in this area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF