Search

Objective: To improve the pharmacokinetics of protease inhibitors, boosting with low-dose ritonavir is performed. However, toxicity, storage conditions and high costs of antiretroviral treatment may necessitate interruption of ritonavir. Ketoconazole was investigated as a potential booster of once-daily (o.d.) saquinavir., Methods: In a single-group, two-period design, 25 virologically and immunologically stable patients on saquinavir/ritonavir 2000/100 mg o.d. were switched to saquinavir/ketoconazole 2000/400 mg o.d. for 2 weeks. Two steady-state pharmacokinetic curves were recorded at both periods., Results: Fourteen females and 11 male patients were included. Median age was 34 years [interquartile range (IQR), 32-42 years], body weight 54 kg (IQR, 47-59 kg) and body mass index 21 kg/m (19-23 kg/m). The mean saquinavir area under the curve (AUC) during boosting with ritonavir was 57.93 +/- 27.96 mg/h/l, maximum observed concentration (Cmax) was 7.50 +/- 3.45 mg/l and concentration at 24 h (Cmin) was 0.35 +/- 0.30 mg/l. When ketoconazole was used, the saquinavir AUC, Cmax, and Cmin were 12.00 +/- 6.97 mg/h/l, 2.43 +/- 1.35 mg/l and 0.03 +/- 0.04 mg/l, respectively., Conclusion: Boosting with ketoconazole resulted in 80% lower exposure to saquinavir. Although saquinavir AUC might still be adequate for treatment, concentrations at 24 h reached levels below the recommended trough concentrations of 0.1 mg/l, which may result in selection of resistant HIV-1 viral strains. Therefore, boosting of saquinavir by ketoconazole is not recommended.

Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor that in most treatment guidelines is recommended to be taken combined with two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors, as a preferred first-line regimen for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The antiretroviral efficacy of efavirenz-based combination regimens is good, as has been demonstrated in many clinical trials. Efavirenz has a long plasma half-life, which allows for once-daily dosing, but, as a consequence of this and the low genetic barrier, it is also prone to select for viral resistance when adherence to therapy is suboptimal. The most frequently encountered side effects are neuropsychiatric symptoms. These side effects are usually transient, but have been shown to persist for up to 2 years after initiation of therapy in some patients. This review outlines important and recent pharmacological and clinical data, which explain why efavirenz became a component of preferred treatment regimens today.

Background: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in HIV-1-infected patients in resource-limited African countries. HIV-1 screening, therapy, counseling, monitoring, training, and education were provided free of charge., Methods: In an open-label cohort program, 206 antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients who could not afford HAART were recruited in 4 urban clinics in Senegal, Côte d'Ivoire, Uganda, and Kenya and were treated with saquinavir boosted with ritonavir (1600/100 mg once daily), lamivudine (150 mg twice daily), and zidovudine (300 mg twice daily). The primary outcome was a plasma viral load (pVL) of <400 copies/mL after 96 weeks of treatment. Secondary analyses included CD4 cell count changes and the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events., Results: The median age of the patient group was 36 years, 38% were male, 35% of the patients had AIDS, the median CD4 count was 119 cells/microL, and the median pVL was 304,210 copies/mL. Overall, 65%/52% (on treatment [OT]/intent to treat [ITT]) of the patients had a pVL <400 copies/mL after 96 weeks of follow-up. This proportion varied significantly between sites, however; although in Nairobi and Dakar, 51%/40% and 56%/46% (OT/ITT) were found, respectively, Abidjan and Kampala showed proportions of 69%/54% and 83%/69% (OT/ITT), respectively. The median increase in the CD4 count was 198 cells/microL (interquartile range: 86-319 cells/microL), ranging from 191 to 292 cells/microL between the sites. Fourteen patients (6.8%) died between 8 and 96 weeks of follow-up, whereas 18 (9%) developed an AIDS-defining event between 8 and 96 weeks of follow-up. Non-HIV-related serious adverse events occurred in 55 patients (26.7%), of whom 13 were diagnosed with severe anemia. Thirty-five patients (17%) changed treatment for toxicity reasons., Conclusions: Although a statistically significant difference was observed between sites with respect to virologic success, overall virologic and immunologic responses to HAART in resource-limited African settings can be as good as in Western settings. There were some difficulties (eg, laboratory, logistics, proper training) during the early phase of the program. Therefore, provision of adequate medical care, counseling, proper instruction, and education of patients and medical staff during the entire study is warranted in such programs, with special care in the early phase.

Objectives: Differential exposure to saquinavir/ritonavir may lead to therapy failure. The objective was to identify factors that influence variability of saquinavir/ritonavir plasma concentrations., Methods: Saquinavir/ritonavir data, dosed as 1600/100 mg once daily, from three separate pharmacokinetic studies, in 45 patients from Thailand and the UK, were pooled. Pharmacokinetic parameters were based on non-compartmental analysis. Univariate analysis was performed with saquinavir as the dependent variable, and ritonavir area under the curve (AUC), gender, body weight, body mass index (BMI) and study site as independent variables. Variables with a P value <0.10 were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis., Results: Higher saquinavir AUCs, maximum concentrations (Cmax) and minimum concentrations (Cmin) were seen in Thai patients than in UK patients. Univariate analysis showed associations between body weight, gender, study site and ritonavir AUC and saquinavir AUC (P < 0.05), whereas BMI (P = 0.13) did not. In the multivariate analysis, ritonavir AUC (P = 0.0001) and study site (P = 0.0021) were significantly related to saquinavir AUC (R2 = 0.50)., Conclusions: The ritonavir AUC and study site appeared to be related to exposure of saquinavir. Study site should be viewed as the total of country- and study-specific differences--such as differences in lifestyle, environment, genetic background and dietary composition--between the analysed studies.

Background: The initial rate of plasma HIV-1 RNA (pVL) decline has been proposed as a marker of early efficacy of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and a possible predictor of late efficacy. We compared the rate of pVL decline in patients starting ART with nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV), or both drugs combined in addition to lamivudine (3TC) and stavudine (d4T)., Methods: Analysis of the viral decay constant (VDc) during the first 2 weeks of treatment in patients enrolled in the 2NN study who remained on allocated treatment., Results: The median VDc (log10 copies per day, [interquartile range]) was similar for NVP (0.30 [0.25-0.36], EFV (0.31 [0.27-0.37]), and NVP + EFV (0.30 [0.27-0.36]). Patients with a baseline pVL >100,000 copies/mL were 8.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-12.3) times more likely to have a VDc >75th percentile. A high VDc was not associated with plasma drug concentration or with a decreased risk of virologic failure at week 48 after the start of therapy (hazard ratio = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.2)., Conclusion: NVP, EFV, or NVP + EFV in combination with 3TC and d4T show similar rates of pVL decline during the first 2 weeks of treatment. The VDc with these regimens is not predictive of late virologic efficacy.

Objectives: In countries with high numbers of HIV/tuberculosis coinfection nevirapine and rifampin are used extensively. However, limited data are available about whether or not nevirapine and rifampin can be safely coadministered without the plasma concentration of nevirapine falling below therapeutic levels., Methods: Blood samples for determination of nevirapine plasma concentrations were collected from patients using nevirapine 200 mg twice daily with or without concomitant rifampin. Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to investigate factors possibly related to nevirapine concentrations., Results: We received 74 blood samples from patients using nevirapine plus rifampin, and collected blood samples from an equal number of controls using nevirapine only. Groups were similar for age, gender, weight, height and body mass index (BMI). In the rifampin group the mean nevirapine concentration was 5.47 +/- 2.66 mg/l, whereas in the control group the mean nevirapine concentration was 8.72 +/- 3.98 mg/l. In the rifampin group seven nevirapine trough concentrations were low (< 3.1 mg/l), while in the control group two patients had low nevirapine trough concentrations (P = 0.164). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, corrected for time after drug intake, the use of rifampin was significantly (P < 0.001) associated with lower nevirapine plasma concentrations, whereas higher BMI reached borderline significance (P = 0.065)., Conclusion: Although nevirapine plasma concentrations were 3.3 mg/l lower when co-administered with rifampin, still more than 86% of these patients had nevirapine plasma concentrations > 3.1 mg/l. Our results suggest that from a pharmacological point of view the majority of Thai coinfected patients, who have low BMIs, reach nevirapine plasma concentrations that are adequate for treatment of HIV. However this can only be undertaken if nevirapine plasma concentration monitoring is available and can be closely followed.

To investigate the influence of the CC chemokine receptor 2 64I and CC chemokine receptor 5 delta32 polymorphisms on the virologic and immunologic response of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients to highly active antiretroviral therapy, data from 4 clinical studies were pooled. The prevalence of the CCR5 delta32 polymorphism was 21% (27 of 130 subjects), and the prevalence of the CCR2 64I polymorphism was 15% (19 of 130 subjects). There were no major differences between subjects with and without polymorphisms in the CCR5 and/or CCR2 genes with respect to the rate of initial viral clearance, proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels below the lower limit of quantification, rate of virologic treatment failure, immunologic responses, and disease progression during 96 weeks of follow-up.

This retrospective cohort study investigated whether particular antiretroviral agents are associated with a higher risk for developing grade 4 liver enzyme elevations (LEEs) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 infection who are starting to receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Grade 4 LEE was defined as aminotransferase levels >10 times the upper limit of normal and >200 U above baseline levels. A multivariate Cox model was used to identify risk factors. The incidence of LEE was 6.3%. No patients died of LEE consequences. Risk factors were higher baseline alanine aminotransferase levels, chronic hepatitis B or C virus infection, antiretroviral therapy-naive patients undergoing their first HAART regimen, recent start of a regimen of nevirapine or high-dose ritonavir, and female sex. In hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients, discontinuing lamivudine (3TC) use was a risk factor. In 97% of cases, >or=1 risk factor was present. In HBV-coinfected patients using 3TC, continued use of 3TC should be considered, even if 3TC-resistant HIV strains develop.

We studied T cell dynamics in four patients who initially responded well to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) but subsequently experienced virological failure. Maintenance of peripheral blood CD4T cell counts was associated with low levels of immune activation. Low reactivity to rebounding virus may preserve normal T lymphocyte distribution over blood and tissues and be associated with stable peripheral blood T cell numbers in virological failures to HAART.

Background: The treatment of HIV-1-infected patients with triple-drug combination therapy results in profound suppression of viral replication. In most therapy-naive patients plasma HIV-1-RNA levels (pVL) drop below the lower limit of quantification (LLQ) of currently used assays. In a large percentage of such patients, more sensitive assays provide evidence of residual viral replication. The question is whether more potent therapy can further suppress this residual replication., Methods: Thirty control patients who, using very strict criteria, had not experienced virological failure during 3 years of standard therapy, were compared with 10 patients treated with a five-drug regimen, consisting of three different classes of antiretroviral drugs (alternative multidrug regimen). A modified ultrasensitive assay with an LLQ of 5 copies/ml was used to re-test plasma obtained at week 48 and at three timepoints at and around week 144., Results: At weeks 48 and 144 pVL could be quantified significantly more frequently in control patients than in patients using the alternative multidrug regimen (week 48: 42 versus 0% with quantifiable pVL, P = 0.017; week 144: 60 versus 14% with at least one quantifiable pVL, P = 0.036, respectively). A low baseline CD4T cell count was predictive of quantifiable pVL in control patients, but not in alternative multidrug patients., Conclusion: This proof-of-principle study demonstrates that the use of an alternative multidrug regimen results in stronger long-term suppression of pVL compared with clinically successful treatment with standard therapy.