Search

The adenosine 2A receptor (A 2A R), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), was solubilised and purified encapsulated in styrene maleic acid lipid particles (SMALPs). The purified A 2A R-SMALP was associated with phospholipids characteristic of the plasma membrane of Pichia pastoris , the host used for its expression, confirming that the A 2A R-SMALP encapsulated native lipids. The fluorescence spectrum of the A 2A R-SMALP showed a characteristic broad emission peak at 330 nm, produced by endogenous Trp residues. The inverse agonist ZM241385 caused 30% increase in fluorescence emission, unusually accompanied by a red-shift in the emission wavelength. The emission spectrum also showed sub-peaks at 321 nm, 335 nm and 350 nm, indicating that individual Trp inhabited different environments following ZM241385 addition. There was no effect of the agonist NECA on the A 2A R-SMALP fluorescence spectrum. Substitution of two Trp residues by Tyr suggested that ZM241385 affected the environment and mobility of Trp2466.48 in TM6 and Trp2687.33 at the extracellular face of TM7, causing transition to a more hydrophobic environment. The fluorescent moiety IAEDANS was site-specifically introduced at the intracellular end of TM6 (residue 2316.33) to report on the dynamic cytoplasmic face of the A 2A R. The inverse agonist ZM241385 caused a concentration-dependent increase in fluorescence emission as the IAEDANS moved to a more hydrophobic environment, consistent with closing the G-protein binding crevice. NECA generated only 30% of the effect of ZM241385. This study provides insight into the SMALP environment; encapsulation supported constitutive activity of the A 2A R and ZM241385-induced conformational transitions but the agonist NECA generated only small effects. Unlabelled Image • Conformational changes in the A 2A R monitored in a nano-scale membrane disc (SMALP). • Profile of phospholipids in A 2A R-SMALP similar to the plasma membrane. • A partially-active conformation of A 2A R is supported in a SMALP. • Inverse agonist induced dose-dependent conformational transitions in A 2A R-SMALP. • In contrast to inverse agonist, agonist induced only small conformational changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Doxorubicin (Doxo)-associated cardio-and vasotoxicity has been recognised as a serious complication of cancer chemotherapy. The purpose of this novel paper was to determine the effect of Doxo on G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated vasocontraction located on vascular smooth muscle cells. Rat left anterior descending artery segments were incubated for 24 h with 0.5 µM Doxo. The vasocontractile responses by activation of endothelin receptor type A (ET A ) and type B (ET B ), serotonin receptor 1B (5-HT 1B ) and thromboxane A2 prostanoid receptor (TP) were investigated by a sensitive myography using specific agonists, while the specificity of the GPCR agonists was verified by applying selective antagonists (i.e. ET A and ET B agonist = 10 - 14 -10 - 7.5 M endothelin-1 (ET-1); ET A antagonist = 10 µM BQ123; ET B agonists = 10 - 14 -10 - 7.5 M sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) and ET-1; ET B antagonist = 0.1 µM BQ788; 5-HT 1B agonist = 10 - 12 -10 - 5.5 M 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT); 5-HT 1B antagonist = 1 µM GR55562; TP agonist = 10 - 12 -10 - 6.5 M U46619; TP antagonist = 1 µM Seratrodast). Our results show that 0.5 µM Doxo incubation of LAD segments leads to an increased VSMC vasocontraction through the ET B , 5-HT 1B and TP GPCRs, with a 2.2-fold increase in ET B -mediated vasocontraction at 10 - 10.5 M S6c, a 2.0-fold increase in 5-HT 1B -mediated vasocontraction at 10 - 5.5 M 5-CT, and a 1.3-fold increase in TP-mediated vasocontraction at 10 - 6.5 M U46619. Further studies unravelling the involvement of intracellular GPCR signalling pathways will broaden our understanding of the Doxo-induced vasotoxicity, and thus pave the way to mitigate the adverse effects by potential implementation of adjunct therapy options., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a life-threatening complication of end-stage liver disease first reported over a century ago, but its management still poses an unmet challenge. A therapeutic agent found to stabilize the condition is a short cyclic peptide, vasopressin analogue, terlipressin (TP). While TP is commonly prescribed for HRS patients in most parts of the world, it was only recently approved for use in the United States. TP exhibits short circulation half-lives and adverse side effects associated with the dose required. Herein, we present a 1,18-octadecanedioic acid (ODDA) conjugate of the cyclic peptide (ODDA-TP), which enables noncovalent binding to serum albumin via native fatty acid binding modes. ODDA-TP is demonstrated to outperform TP alone in studies including in vitro cellular receptor activation, stability in plasma, pharmacokinetics, and performance in vivo in rats. Specifically, ODDA-TP had an elimination half-life 20 times that of TP alone while exhibiting a superior safety profile., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interest., (© 2024 American Chemical Society.)

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane proteins, regulate a plethora of physiological responses and are the therapeutic target for 30-40% of clinically-prescribed drugs. They are integral membrane proteins deeply embedded in the plasma membrane where they activate intracellular signalling via coupling to G-proteins and β-arrestin. GPCRs are in intimate association with the bilayer lipids and that lipid environment regulates the signalling functions of GPCRs. This complex lipid 'landscape' is both heterogeneous and dynamic. GPCR function is modulated by bulk membrane properties including membrane fluidity, microdomains, curvature, thickness and asymmetry but GPCRs are also regulated by specific lipid:GPCR binding, including cholesterol and anionic lipids. Understanding the molecular mechanisms whereby GPCR signalling is regulated by lipids is a very active area of research currently. A major advance in membrane protein research in recent years was the application of poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) copolymers. These spontaneously generate SMA lipid particles (SMALPs) encapsulating membrane protein in a nano-scale disc of cell membrane, thereby removing the historical need for detergent and preserving lipid:GPCR interaction. The focus of this review is how GPCR-SMALPs are increasing our understanding of GPCR structure and function at the molecular level. Furthermore, an increasing number of 'second generation' SMA-like copolymers have been reported recently. These are reviewed from the context of increasing our understanding of GPCR molecular mechanisms. Moreover, their potential as a novel platform for downstream biophysical and structural analyses is assessed and looking ahead, the translational application of SMA-like copolymers to GPCR drug discovery programmes in the future is considered., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicting interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. GCK and BK are directors of Nanosene (Pty) Ltd, a company that commercializes amphiphilic copolymers for the isolation of membrane proteins., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Membrane proteins are of fundamental importance to cellular processes and nano-encapsulation strategies that preserve their native lipid bilayer environment are particularly attractive for studying and exploiting these proteins. Poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) and related polymers poly(styrene-co-(N-(3-N',N'-dimethylaminopropyl)maleimide)) (SMI) and poly(diisobutylene-alt-maleic acid) (DIBMA) have revolutionised the study of membrane proteins by spontaneously solubilising membrane proteins direct from cell membranes within nanoscale discs of native bilayer called SMA lipid particles (SMALPs), SMILPs and DIBMALPs respectively. This systematic study shows for the first time, that conformational changes of the encapsulated protein are dictated by the solubilising polymer. The photoactivation pathway of rhodopsin (Rho), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), comprises structurally-defined intermediates with characteristic absorbance spectra that revealed conformational restrictions with styrene-containing SMA and SMI, so that photoactivation proceeded only as far as metarhodopsin-I, absorbing at 478 nm, in a SMALP or SMILP. In contrast, full attainment of metarhodopsin-II, absorbing at 382 nm, was observed in a DIBMALP. Consequently, different intermediate states of Rho could be generated readily by simply employing different SMA-like polymers. Dynamic light-scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation revealed differences in size and thermostability between SMALP, SMILP and DIBMALP. Moreover, encapsulated Rho exhibited different stability in a SMALP, SMILP or DIBMALP. Overall, we establish that SMA, SMI and DIBMA constitute a 'toolkit' of solubilising polymers, so that selection of the appropriate solubilising polymer provides a spectrum of useful attributes for studying membrane proteins.

The fundamental importance of membrane proteins in cellular processes has driven a marked increase in the use of membrane mimetic approaches for studying and exploiting these proteins. Nano-encapsulation strategies which preserve the native lipid bilayer environment are particularly attractive. Consequently, the use of poly(styrene co-maleic acid) (SMA) has been widely adopted to solubilise proteins directly from cell membranes by spontaneously forming "SMA Lipid Particles" (SMALPs). G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are ubiquitous "chemical switches", are central to cell signalling throughout the evolutionary tree, form the largest family of membrane proteins in humans and are a major drug discovery target. GPCR-SMALPs that retain binding capability would be a versatile platform for a wide range of down-stream applications. Here, using the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) as an archetypical GPCR, we show for the first time the utility of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) to characterise the binding capability of GPCRs following nano-encapsulation. Unbound fluorescent ligand CA200645 exhibited a monophasic autocorrelation curve (dwell time, τD = 68 ± 2 μs; diffusion coefficient, D = 287 ± 15 μm2 s-1). In the presence of A2AR-SMALP, bound ligand was also evident (τD = 625 ± 23 μs; D = 30 ± 4 μm2 s-1). Using a non-receptor control (ZipA-SMALP) plus competition binding confirmed that this slower component represented binding to the encapsulated A2AR. Consequently, the combination of GPCR-SMALP and FCS is an effective platform for the quantitative real-time characterisation of nano-encapsulated receptors, with single molecule sensitivity, that will have widespread utility for future exploitation of GPCR-SMALPs in general.

Corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) acts via two family B G-protein-coupled receptors, CRFR1 and CRFR2. Additional subtypes exist due to alternative splicing. CRFR1α is the most widely expressed subtype and lacks a 29-residue insert in the first intracellular loop that is present in CRFR1β. It has been shown previously that co-expression of CRFR1β with receptor activity modifying protein 2 (RAMP2) in HEK 293S cells increased the cell-surface expression of both proteins suggesting a physical interaction as seen with RAMPs and calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR). This study investigated the ability of CRFR1α, CRFR1β and CRFR2β to promote cell-surface expression of FLAG-tagged RAMP2. Four different cell-lines were utilised to investigate the effect of varying cellular context; COS-7, HEK 293T, HEK 293S and [ΔCTR]HEK 293 (which lacks endogenous calcitonin receptor). In all cell-lines, CRFR1α and CRFR1β enhanced RAMP2 cell-surface expression. The magnitude of the effect on RAMP2 was dependent on the cell-line ([ΔCTR]HEK 293 > COS-7 > HEK 293T > HEK 293S). RT-PCR indicated this variation may relate to differences in endogenous RAMP expression between cell types. Furthermore, pre-treatment with CRF resulted in a loss of cell-surface FLAG-RAMP2 when it was co-expressed with CRFR1 subtypes. CRFR2β co-expression had no effect on RAMP2 in any cell-line. Molecular modelling suggests that the potential contact interface between the extracellular domains of RAMP2 and CRF receptor subtypes is smaller than that of RAMP2 and CRL, the canonical receptor:RAMP pairing, assuming a physical interaction. Furthermore, a specific residue difference between CRFR1 subtypes (glutamate) and CRFR2β (histidine) in this interface region may impair CRFR2β:RAMP2 interaction by electrostatic repulsion., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The fundamental importance of membrane proteins in drug discovery has meant that membrane mimetic systems for studying membrane proteins are of increasing interest. One such system has been the amphipathic, negatively charged poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) polymer to form "SMA Lipid Particles" (SMALPs) which have been widely adopted to solubilize membrane proteins directly from the cell membrane. However, SMALPs are only soluble under basic conditions and precipitate in the presence of divalent cations required for many downstream applications. Here, we show that the positively charged poly(styrene-co-maleimide) (SMI) forms similar nanoparticles with comparable efficiency to SMA, whilst remaining functional at acidic pH and compatible with high concentrations of divalent cations. We have performed a detailed characterization of the performance of SMI that enables a direct comparison with similar data published for SMA. We also demonstrate that SMI is capable of extracting proteins directly from the cell membrane and can solubilize functional human G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed in cultured HEK 293T cells. "SMILPs" thus provide an alternative membrane solubilization method that successfully overcomes some of the limitations of the SMALP method.

In the past few years there has been a growth in the use of nano-particles for stabilizing lipid membranes with embedded proteins. These bionanoparticles provide a solution to the challenging problem of membrane protein isolation by maintaining a lipid bilayer essential to protein integrity and activity. We have described the use of an amphipathic polymer (Poly(styrene-co-maleic acid); SMA) to produce discoidal nanoparticles that contain a lipid bilayer with embedded protein. However the structure of the nanoparticle itself has not yet been determined. This leaves a major gap in understanding how the SMA stabilizes the encapsulated bilayer and how the bilayer relates physically and structurally to an unecapsulated lipid bilayer. In this paper we address this issue by describing the structure of the SMA Lipid Particle (SMALP) using data from small angle neutron scattering (SANS), electron microscopy (EM), attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). We show that the particle is disc shaped containing a polymer "bracelet" encircling the lipid bilayer. The structure and orientation of the individual components within the bilayer and polymer are determined showing that styrene moieties within SMA intercalate between the lipid acyl chains. The dimensions of the encapsulated bilayer are also determined and match those measured for a natural membrane. Taken together, the description of structure of the SMALP forms the foundation of future development and applications of SMALPs in membrane protein production and analysis.

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are highly flexible and dynamic proteins, which are able to interact with diverse ligands, effectors, and regulatory proteins. Site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) is a powerful tool for providing insight into how these proteins actually work, both in its own right and when used in conjunction with information provided by other techniques such as crystallography or molecular modelling. Mutagenesis has been used to identify and characterise a myriad of functionally important residues, motifs and domains within the GPCR architecture, and to identify aspects of similarity and differences between the major families of GPCRs. This chapter presents the necessary information for undertaking informative SDM of these proteins. Whilst this is relevant to protein structure/function studies in -general, specific pitfalls and protocols suited to investigating GPCRs in particular will be highlighted.

Background: Clinicians use fibrosis in a liver biopsy to predict clinical outcomes of chronic liver disease. The performance of non-invasive tests has been evaluated against histological assessment of fibrosis but use of clinical outcomes as the reference standard would be ideal. The enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test was derived and validated in a large cohort of patients and shown to have high diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC)=0.80 95% CI 0.76 to 0.85) in identification of significant fibrosis on biopsy., Objective: To evaluate ELF performance in predicting clinical outcomes by following up the original ELF cohort., Methods: Patients recruited to the ELF study at seven English centres were followed up for liver morbidity and mortality by examination of clinical data. Defaulting/discharged patients were followed up by family practitioner questionnaires. Primary outcome measure was liver-related morbidity/liver-related death., Results: 457 patients were followed up (median 7 years), with ascertainment of clinical status in 92%. There were 61 liver-related outcomes (39 deaths). Survival analysis showed that the ELF score predicts liver outcomes, with people having the highest ELF scores being significantly more likely to have clinical outcomes than those in lower-score groups. A Cox proportional hazards model showed fully adjusted HRs of 75 (ELF score 12.52-16.67), 20 (10.426-12.51) and 5 (8.34-10.425) compared with patients with ELF <8.34. A unit change in ELF is associated with a doubling of risk of liver-related outcome., Conclusions: An ELF test can predict clinical outcomes in patients with chronic liver disease and may be a useful prognostic tool in clinical practice.

The role of receptor activity modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) in forming receptors with the calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR) and the calcitonin receptor (CTR) was examined by producing chimeras between RAMP1 and RAMP3. RAMPs have three extracellular helices. Exchange of helix 1 of the RAMPs or residues 62-69 in helix 2 greatly reduced CLR trafficking (a marker for CLR association). Modeling suggests that these exchanges alter the CLR recognition site on RAMP1, which is more exposed than on RAMP3. Exchange of residues 86-89 of RAMP1 had no effect on the trafficking of CLR but reduced the potency of human (h) alphaCGRP and adrenomedullin. However, these alterations to RAMP1 had no effect on the potency of hbetaCGRP. These residues of RAMP1 lie at the junction of helix 3 and its connecting loop with helix 2. Modeling suggests that the loop is more exposed in RAMP1 than RAMP3; it may play an important role in peptide binding, either directly or indirectly. Exchange of residues 90-94 of RAMP1 caused a modest reduction in CLR expression and a 15-fold decrease in CGRP potency. It is unlikely that the decrease in expression is enough to explain the reduction in potency, and so these may have dual roles in recognizing CLR and CGRP. For CTR, only 6 out of 26 chimeras covering the extracellular part of RAMP1 did not reduce agonist potency. Thus the association of CTR with RAMP1 seems more sensitive to changes in RAMP1 structure induced by the chimeras than is CLR.

We investigated the cause of mild mucocutaneous bleeding in a 14-year-old male patient (P1). Platelet aggregation and ATP secretion induced by arachidonic acid and the thromboxane A(2) receptor (TxA(2)R) agonist U46619 were reduced in P1 compared with controls, whereas the responses to other platelet agonists were retained. P1 was heterozygous for a transversion within the TBXA2R gene predictive of a D304N substitution in the TxA(2)R. In Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells expressing the variant D304N TxA(2)R, U46619 did not increase cytosolic free Ca(2+) concentration, indicating loss of receptor function. The TxA(2)R antagonist [(3)H]-SQ29548 showed an approximate 50% decrease in binding to platelets from P1 but absent binding to Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells expressing variant D304N TxA(2)R. This is the second naturally occurring TxA(2)R variant to be associated with platelet dysfunction and the first in which loss of receptor function is associated with reduced ligand binding. D304 lies within a conserved NPXXY motif in transmembrane domain 7 of the TxA(2)R that is a key structural element in family A G protein-coupled receptors. Our demonstration that the D304N substitution causes clinically significant platelet dysfunction by reducing ligand binding establishes the importance of the NPXXY motif for TxA(2)R function in vivo.

Background and Purpose: The anti-cancer agent [Arg(6), D-Trp(7,9), N(me)Phe(8)]-substance P (6-11) (SP-G) modulates gastrin releasing peptide (GRP) and arginine vasopressin signalling in small cell lung cancer cells leading to growth arrest and apoptosis. We have shown that SP-G acts as a biased agonist at GRP receptors. This work examines the hypothesis that SP-G acts as a biased agonist at the V(1A) vasopressin receptor., Experimental Approach: The human V(1A) receptor was expressed in CHO-K1 cells. Extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) activation and intracellular Ca(2+) were measured using activation state-specific antibodies and Fura-2-AM respectively. The effect of SP-G on tumourigenicity was assessed by colony assay., Key Results: In V(1A) receptor expressing cells, SP-G caused a sustained activation of ERK via a stimulation of V(1A) receptor coupling to G(i). Inhibition of G(i) with Pertussis toxin attenuated the inhibition by SP-G of the growth of CHO-K1 cells stably expressing the V(1A) receptor. Chimeric V(1A) receptors containing the second or third intracellular loop of the V(2) receptor were capable of binding vasopressin and SP-G but had altered ability to activate phospholipase C (PLC) and ERK. The second intracellular loop of the V(1A) receptor was essential for vasopressin-stimulated PLC and ERK activation but not for SP-G-induced ERK activation., Conclusions and Implications: This work provides mechanistic insight, for biased agonists at V(1A) receptors and highlights a potential role for such agents as anti-cancer agents.

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) typically have a functionally important C-terminus which, in the largest subfamily (family A), includes a membrane-parallel eighth helix. Mutations of this region are associated with several diseases. There are few C-terminal studies on the family B GPCRs and no data supporting the existence of a similar eighth helix in this second major subfamily, which has little or no sequence homology to family A GPCRs. Here we show that the C-terminus of a family B GPCR (CLR) has a disparate region from N400 to C436 required for CGRP-mediated internalization, and a proximal region of twelve residues (from G388 to W399), in a similar position to the family A eighth helix, required for receptor localization at the cell surface. A combination of circular and linear dichroism, fluorescence and modified waterLOGSY NMR spectroscopy (SALMON) demonstrated that a peptide mimetic of this domain readily forms a membrane-parallel helix anchored to the liposome by an interfacial tryptophan residue. The study reveals two key functions held within the C-terminus of a family B GPCR and presents support for an eighth helical region with striking topological similarity to the nonhomologous family A receptor. This helix structure appears to be found in most other family B GPCRs.

Galnon was first reported as a low molecular weight non-peptide agonist at galanin receptors [Saar et al. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7136-7141]. Following its systemic administration, this synthetic ligand affected a range of important physiological processes including appetite, seizures and pain. Physiological activity of galnon could not be explained solely by the activation of the three known galanin receptors, GalR1, GalR2 and GalR3. Consequently, it was possible that galnon generates its manifold effects by interacting with other signaling pathway components, in addition to via GalR1-3. In this report, we establish that galnon: (i) can penetrate across the plasma membrane of cells, (ii) can activate intracellular G-proteins directly independent of receptor activation thereby triggering downstream signaling, (iii) demonstrates selectivity for different G-proteins, and (iiii) is a ligand to other G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in addition to via GalR1-3. We conclude that galnon has multiple sites of interaction within the GPCR signaling cascade which mediate its physiological effects.

It is fundamentally important to define how agonist-receptor interaction differs from antagonist-receptor interaction. The V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) is a member of the neurohypophysial hormone subfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the N-terminal juxtamembrane segment of the V1aR, we now establish that Glu54 (1.35) is critical for arginine vasopressin binding. The mutant [E54A]V1aR exhibited decreased arginine vasopressin affinity (1700-fold) and disrupted signaling, but antagonist binding was unaffected. Mutation of Glu54 had an almost identical pharmacological effect as mutation of Arg46, raising the possibility that agonist binding required a mutual interaction between Glu54 and Arg46. The role of these two charged residues was investigated by 1) substituting Glu54; 2) inserting additional Glu/Arg in transmembrane helix (TM) 1; 3) repositioning the Glu/Arg in TM1; and 4) characterizing the reciprocal mutant [R46E/E54R]V1aR. We conclude that 1) the positive/negative charges need to be precisely positioned in this N terminus/TM1 segment; and 2) Glu54 and Arg46 function independently, providing two discrete epitopes required for high-affinity agonist binding and signaling. This study explains why Glu and Arg, part of an -R(X3)L/V(X3)E(X3)L- motif, are conserved at these loci throughout this G protein-coupled receptor subfamily and provides molecular insight into key differences between agonist and antagonist binding requirements.

It is now clear that nearly all G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are phosphorylated and palmitolyated. The process of receptor phosphorylation has been extensively studied because it offers a regulatory mechanism that is both rapid and dynamic. However, it has recently become clear that palmitoyaltion of GPCRs at C-terminal cysteine residues may also offer dynamic receptor modification. A growing number of GPCRs have been demonstrated to undergo rapid agonist-mediated changes in their palmitoylation status with functional implications to receptor signaling. This chapter aims to outline the methods we have used to investigate agonist-mediated changes in GPCR phosphorylation and palmitoylation.

Defining how the agonist-receptor interaction differs from that of the antagonist-receptor and understanding the mechanisms of receptor activation are fundamental issues in cell signalling. The V1a vasopressin receptor (V1aR) is a member of a family of related G-protein coupled receptors that are activated by neurohypophysial peptide hormones, including vasopressin (AVP). It has recently been reported that an arginyl in the distal N-terminus of the V1aR is critical for binding agonists but not antagonists. To determine specific features required at this locus to support high affinity agonist binding and second messenger generation, Arg46 was substituted by all other 19 encoded amino acids. Our data establish that there is an absolute requirement for arginyl, as none of the [R46X]V1aR mutant constructs supported high affinity agonist binding and all 19 had defective signalling. In contrast, all of the mutant receptors possessed wildtype binding for both peptide and nonpeptide antagonists. The ratio of Ki to EC50, an indicator of efficacy, was increased for all substitutions. Consequently, although [R46X]V1aR constructs have a lower affinity for agonist, once AVP has bound all 19 are more likely than the wildtype V1aR to become activated. Therefore, in the wildtype V1aR, Arg46 constrains the inactive conformation of the receptor. On binding AVP this constraint is alleviated, promoting the transition to active V1aR. Our findings explain why arginyl is conserved at this locus throughout the evolutionary lineage of the neurohypophysial peptide hormone receptor family of G-protein coupled receptors.

A fundamental issue in molecular endocrinology is to define how agonist:receptor interaction differs from antagonist:receptor interaction. The vasopressin V1a receptor (V1aR) is a member of a subfamily of related G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by the hormone AVP or related peptides. The N-terminus of the V1aR has recently been shown to be critical for binding agonists but not antagonists. Using a combination of N-terminally truncated constructs and alanine-scanning mutagenesis, individual residues that provide these agonist-specific binding epitopes have now been identified in this study. Our data establish that a single residue, Arg46, is critical for AVP binding to the V1aR. Systematic substitution revealed that Arg was required at this locus and could not be substituted by Lys, Glu, Leu, or Ala. In contrast, antagonist binding (cyclic or linear, peptide or nonpeptide) was unaffected. Disruption of Arg46 also resulted in defective intracellular signaling. Arginine is conserved at this locus in all members of the neurohypophysial peptide hormone receptor family cloned to date, indicative of a fundamental role in receptor function. In addition to Arg46, the residues Leu42, Gly43, Asp45 form a patch contributing to AVP binding. This study provides molecular insight into the role of the V1aR N-terminus and key differences between agonist and antagonist binding requirements.