151. Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Respiratory Rate Modify the Association of Mechanical Power and Driving Pressure With Mortality Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
- Author
-
Tonna JE, Peltan ID, Brown SM, Grissom CK, Presson AP, Herrick JS, Vasques F, and Keenan HT
- Abstract
Importance: Mechanical power and driving pressure have known associations with survival for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome., Objectives: To further understand the relative importance of mechanical power and driving pressure as clinical targets for ventilator management., Design: Secondary observational analysis of randomized clinical trial data., Setting and Participants: Patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome from three Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network trials., Main Outcomes and Measures: After adjusting for patient severity in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, we examined the relative association of driving pressure and mechanical power with hospital mortality. Among 2,410 patients, the relationship between driving pressure and mechanical power with mortality was modified by respiratory rate, positive end-expiratory pressure, and flow., Results: Among patients with low respiratory rate (< 26), only power was significantly associated with mortality (power [hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.41-2.35; p < 0.001] vs driving pressure [hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21; p = 0.95]), while among patients with high respiratory rate, neither was associated with mortality. Both power and driving pressure were associated with mortality at high airway flow (power [hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.15-1.43; p < 0.001] vs driving pressure [hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30; p = 0.041]) and neither at low flow. At low positive end-expiratory pressure, neither was associated with mortality, whereas at high positive end-expiratory pressure (≥ 10 cm H
2 O), only power was significantly associated with mortality (power [hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.37; p < 0.001] vs driving pressure [hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.99-1.35; p = 0.059])., Conclusions and Relevance: The relationship between mechanical power and driving pressure with mortality differed within severity subgroups defined by positive end-expiratory pressure, respiratory rate, and airway flow., Competing Interests: Dr. Tonna was supported by a career development award (K23HL141596) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Tonna received speakers fees and travel compensation from LivaNova and Philips Healthcare, unrelated to this work. Dr. Peltan was supported by a career development award (K23GM129661) from the National Institute of General Medical Studies of the NIH. Dr. Peltan has received research funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals; his institution has received funding to support work from Asahi Kasei Pharma and Regeneron. Dr. Brown is supported by grants from NIH/NHLBI: U01HL123018, R01HL144624. Dr. Brown’s institution has received funding to support his work from Faron Pharmaceuticals, Sedana Pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Brown receives royalties from Oxford University Press. Dr. Brown has been paid directly by Hamilton Ventilators to Chair a Data Safety Monitoring Board. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.)- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF