151. Early Catheter Removal After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from a Prospective Single-institutional Randomized Trial (Ripreca Study).
- Author
-
Lista G, Lughezzani G, Buffi NM, Saita A, Vanni E, Hurle R, Cardone P, Peschechera R, Forni G, Lazzeri M, Guazzoni G, and Casale P
- Subjects
- Aged, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Device Removal, Prostatectomy methods, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Urinary Catheters
- Abstract
Background: The adoption of robotic technology in the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) could lead to improvement in outcomes., Objective: To evaluate feasibility, to compare functional outcomes, and to assess the economic benefits of removing catheter on the postoperative day (POD) 3 versus POD 5 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)., Design, Setting, and Participants: From September 2016 to May 2017, patients selected to undergo RARP for clinically localized PCa at a high-volume center were prospectively randomized into group 1 (POD 3; n=72) versus group 2 (POD 5, n=74)., Intervention: All patients underwent RARP with anatomical posterior and anterior reconstruction., Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: The primary endpoint was to compare acute urinary retention (AUR) and urinary leakage rate in the two groups. The secondary endpoints were early and mid-term postoperative functional outcomes assessed through questionnaires (ICIQ-MLUTS, IPSS), early continence rate, and postoperative pain/discomfort (visual analog scale score). The economic impact of early catheter removal was also assessed., Results and Limitations: AUR was reported in two (1.4%) cases, one for each study group (p=0.9). One case of vesicourethral leakage was reported (0.7%) in group 1. Urethral discomfort and pain at discharge was significantly higher in group 2 (p=0.03). In our clinical practice, POD 3 catheter removal approach would determine a saving of approximately €80 000 and 405 d of hospitalization yearly. The main limitation is the small sample size., Conclusions: Early catheter removal after RARP does not lead to an increase in perioperative complications. No negative effect on early and mid-term functional outcomes was observed. A significant impact on saving economic resources was reported., Patient Summary: We demonstrated that early catheter removal has no negative effect on spontaneous voiding, complications, or urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy., (Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF