151. Erlotinib, Erlotinib–Sulindac versus Placebo: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Window Trial in Operable Head and Neck Cancer
- Author
-
Jill M. Siegfried, Lin Wang, Robert L. Ferris, Melanie S. Flint, Neil D. Gross, Seungwon Kim, William H. Denq, Athanassios Argiris, Simion I. Chiosea, Brian L. Hood, Jonas T. Johnson, Mai Sun, Jennifer R. Grandis, Julie E. Bauman, Sufi M. Thomas, William E. Gooding, Marina N. Nikiforova, Thomas P. Conrads, and Lori J. Wirth
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Proliferation index ,Placebo ,Article ,Cohort Studies ,Immunoenzyme Techniques ,Erlotinib Hydrochloride ,Sulindac ,Double-Blind Method ,Internal medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Biomarkers, Tumor ,medicine ,Humans ,heterocyclic compounds ,neoplasms ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,EGFR inhibitors ,Aged, 80 and over ,business.industry ,Head and neck cancer ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma ,respiratory tract diseases ,ErbB Receptors ,Head and Neck Neoplasms ,Tissue Array Analysis ,Immunology ,Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ,Quinazolines ,Female ,Erlotinib ,business ,Follow-Up Studies ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Purpose: The EGF receptor (EGFR) and COX2 pathways are upregulated in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Preclinical models indicate synergistic antitumor activity from dual blockade. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled window trial of erlotinib, an EGFR inhibitor; erlotinib plus sulindac, a nonselective COX inhibitor; versus placebo. Experimental Design: Patients with untreated, operable stage II-IVb HNSCC were randomized 5:5:3 to erlotinib, erlotinib–sulindac, or placebo. Tumor specimens were collected before and after seven to 14 days of treatment. The primary endpoint was change in Ki67 proliferation index. We hypothesized an ordering effect in Ki67 reduction: erlotinib–sulindac > erlotinib > placebo. We evaluated tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry for pharmacodynamic modulation of EGFR and COX2 signaling intermediates. Results: From 2005–2009, 47 patients were randomized for the target 39 evaluable patients. Thirty-four tumor pairs were of sufficient quality to assess biomarker modulation. Ki67 was significantly decreased by erlotinib or erlotinib–sulindac (omnibus comparison, two-sided Kruskal–Wallis, P = 0.04). Wilcoxon pairwise contrasts confirmed greater Ki67 effect in both erlotinib groups (erlotinib–sulindac vs. placebo, P = 0.043; erlotinib vs. placebo, P = 0.027). There was a significant trend in ordering of Ki67 reduction: erlotinib–sulindac > erlotinib > placebo (two-sided exact Jonckheere–Terpstra, P = 0.0185). Low baseline pSrc correlated with greater Ki67 reduction (R2 = 0.312, P = 0.024). Conclusions: Brief treatment with erlotinib significantly decreased proliferation in HNSCC, with additive effect from sulindac. Efficacy studies of dual EGFR–COX inhibition are justified. pSrc is a potential resistance biomarker for anti-EGFR therapy, and warrants investigation as a molecular target. Clin Cancer Res; 20(12); 3289–98. ©2014 AACR.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF