Search

Background/Objective: The purpose of this prospective multicenter study was to compare results of catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and those with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (NPAF). The impact and the role of repeat catheter ablation were assessed in patients with recurrence. Methods/Results: One thousand four hundred four patients underwent catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) performed by 12 operators at four institutions using a single technique guided by intracardiac echocardiography. Of these patients, 728 had PAF and 676 had NPAF. Among the NPAF patients, 293 had persistent AF and 383 had long-standing persistent AF. Patients with NPAF had a higher incidence of hypertension and/or structural heart disease (64.8% vs 48.5%, P = .003) and a lower mean left ventricular ejection fraction (53.3% ± 8.7% vs 55.7 ± 6.5%, P <.001). All patients underwent antral isolation of all four pulmonary veins and the superior vena cava. At mean follow-up of 57 ± 17 months, 565 of 728 patients with PAF and 454 of 676 patients with NPAF (77.6% vs 67.2%, P <.001) had freedom from AF after a single ablation procedure. For arrhythmia recurrences, 74.2% (121/163) patients with PAF and 74.8% (166/222) with NPAF underwent repeat ablation, after which 92.4% patients with PAF and 84.0% patients with NPAF remained free from AF. Conclusion: Pulmonary vein antrum isolation guided by intracardiac echocardiography results in significant freedom from AF, even when performed by multiple operators in different centers. At least moderate efficacy can be achieved in patients with NPAF, although the success rate is lower than in patients with PAF. Considerably higher success can be achieved in both groups with repeat ablation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Several studies have reported early (EAT) and late (LAT) atrial tachyarrhythmias following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the factors associated with them and their clinical significance are not well known. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors and the relationship between EAT and LAT after AF ablation. Methods: A total of 1298 patients with paroxysmal (54%), persistent (18%), or permanent (28%) AF underwent intracardiac echocardiography-guided pulmonary vein antrum isolation and were followed for 41 ± 10 months. EAT and LAT were defined as an episode of AF or atrial flutter/tachycardia lasting longer than 1 minute that occurred within the first 3 months of ablation and after 3 months postablation, respectively. Results: After a single ablation procedure, EAT developed in 514 (40%) patients and LAT in 292 (22%) patients. At a multivariable analysis, longer AF duration (odds ratio [OR] 1.03), history of hypertension (OR 1.32), left atrial enlargement (OR 1.55), permanent AF (OR 1.72), and lack of superior vena cava isolation (OR 1.60) were significantly associated with EAT. Independent predictors of LAT were longer AF duration (OR 1.03), history of hypertension (OR 1.65), persistent (OR 2.17) or permanent AF (OR 2.28), and occurrence of EAT (OR 30.62). The risk of LAT was inversely related to the time to first EAT occurrence (OR 20, 54, and 1,052 in first, second, and third month, respectively). Notably, 49% of patients with EAT did not experience LAT. Conclusion: EAT strongly predict LAT. However, EAT did not automatically mean ablation failure. Delaying redo procedure may be appropriate during the first 2 months after ablation. Longer AF duration, hypertension, and nonparoxysmal AF are independent predictors of EAT and LAT. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of ibutilide cardioversion for those with atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter (AFL) receiving long-term treatmentwith class IC agents.Attenuation of ibutilide-induced QT prolongation has been observed in a small number of patients pretreated with class IC agents. The clinical significance of the interaction between ibutilide and class IC agents is unknown.Seventy-one patients with AF (n = 48) or AFL (n = 23), receiving propafenone 300 to 900 mg/day (n = 46) or flecainide 100 to 300 mg/day (n = 25), presented for ibutilide (2.0 mg) cardioversion.The mean durations of arrhythmia episode and arrhythmia history were 25 ± 48 days and 4.4 ± 6.4 years, respectively. Sixty-five patients (91.5%) had normal left ventricular systolic function. Twenty-three of 48 patients (47.9%; 95% confidence interval, 33.3% to 62.8%) with AF and 17 of 23 patients (73.9%; 95% confidence interval, 51.6% to 89.8%) with AFL converted with mean conversion times of 25 ± 14 min and 20 ± 12 min, respectively. There was a small increase in corrected QT interval after ibutilide (from442 ± 61 ms to 462 ± 59 ms, p = 0.006). One patient developed non-sustained polymorphous ventricular tachycardia and responded to intravenous magnesium. Another developed sustained torsade de pointes and was treated effectively with direct-current shock and intravenous dopamine.Our observations suggest that the use of ibutilide in patients receiving class IC agents is as successful in restoring sinus rhythm and has a similar incidence of adverse effects as the use of ibutilide alone. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background and purpose: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (S-ICDs) have emerged in recent years as a valid alternative to traditional transvenous ICDs (TV-ICDs). Therefore, the number of S-ICD implantations is rising, leading to a consequent increase in S-ICD-related complications sometimes requiring complete device removal. Thus, the aim of this systematic review is to gather all the available literature on S-ICD lead extraction (SLE), with particular reference to the type of indication, techniques, complications and success rate. Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) from inception to 21 November 2022. The search strategy adopted was developed using the following key words: subcutaneous, S-ICD, defibrillator, ICD, extraction, explantation. Studies were included if they met both of the following criteria: (1) inclusion of patients with S-ICD; (2) inclusion of patients who underwent SLE. Results: Our literature search identified 238 references. Based on the abstract evaluation, 38 of these citations were considered potentially eligible for inclusion, and their full texts were analyzed. We excluded 8 of these studies because no SLE was performed. Eventually, 30 studies were included, with 207 patients who underwent SLE. Overall, the majority of SLEs were performed for non-infective causes (59.90%). Infection of the device (affecting either the lead or the pocket) was the cause of SLE in 38.65% of cases. Indication data were not available in 3/207 cases. The mean dwelling time was 14 months. SLEs were performed using manual traction or with the aid of a tool designed for transvenous lead extraction (TLE), including either a rotational or non-powered mechanical dilator sheath. Conclusions: SLE is performed mainly for non-infective causes. Techniques vary greatly across different studies. Dedicated tools for SLE might be developed in the future and standard approaches should be defined. In the meantime, authors are encouraged to share their experience and data to further refine the existing variegated approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the public health measures of social distancing, the freedom limitations, quarantine, and the enforced homeworking under the lockdown period, as well as medical causes including COVID-19 infection per se, may have caused major emotional distress, especially in the most vulnerable patients. We aimed to evaluate the variations in the number of admissions due to Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Veneto region. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the number of admissions because of TTS in 13 Divisions of Cardiology located in the Veneto region, the northeastern area of Italy, covering a population of more than 2.5 million inhabitants, during the two major pandemic waves of COVID-19 (the first between 15 March and 30 April 2020 and the second between 15 November and 30 December 2020) that occurred in 2020. Results: In total, 807 acute coronary syndromes were admitted in the 13 enrolling hospitals. Among these, 3.9% had TTS. Compared to the corresponding 2018 and 2019 time periods, we observed a significant increase in the number of TTS cases (+15.6%, p = 0.03 and +12.5%, p = 0.04, comparing 2018 to 2020 and 2019 to 2020, respectively). Geographical distribution of the TTS cases reflected the broad spread of the SARS-CoV-2 infection with a significant direct relationship between TTS incidence and the number of COVID-19 infections according to Pearson's correlation (r = 0.798, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The higher incidence of TTS during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic waves, especially in the areas that were hit hardest in terms of morbidity and mortality by the SARS-CoV-2 infection, suggest a strong direct and/or indirect role of COVID-19 in the pathogenesis of TTS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The present study aimed to examine longitudinal trends in hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, by reviewing the data from 13 hospitals of the Veneto Region, in the north-east of Italy. Methods: We performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis including all the consecutive patients presenting with ACS and other acute cardiovascular (CV) conditions (defined as heart failure, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest and venous thromboembolism) hospitalized in 13 different hospitals of the Veneto Region covering a population of 2,554,818 inhabitants, during the first (between 15 March 2020 and 30 April 2020) and second (between 15 November 2020 and 30 December 2020) COVID-19 pandemic waves (the 2020 cohort). Data were compared with those obtained at the same time-windows of years 2018 and 2019 (the historical cohorts). Results: Compared to the historical cohorts, a significant decrease in the number of ACS cases was observed in 2020 (−27.3%, p = 0.01 and −32%, p < 0.001, comparing 2018 versus 2020 and 2019 and 2020, respectively). The proportion of patients hospitalized for acute CV conditions decreased during the first and second wave COVID-19 pandemic when compared to the historical cohorts (−36.5%, p < 0.001 and −40.6%, p < 0.001, comparing 2018 versus 2020 and 2019 and 2020, respectively). Pearson's correlation evidenced a significant inverse relationship between the number of COVID-19 cases and both ACS hospital admissions (r = −0.881, p = 0.005) and hospitalizations for acute CV conditions (r = −0.738, p = 0.01), respectively. Conclusions: The decrease in hospitalizations for ACS and other acute CV conditions will strongly affect future patients' management since undiagnosed nonfatal CV events represent a source of increased (and unknown) CV morbidity and mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The limited success rate of conventional ablation approach including isolation of pulmonary veins (PVI) in non-paroxysmal AF has led to the search for alternative ablation strategies. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of three different ablation approaches for non-paroxysmal AF. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to Group 1: PVI+ isolation of LA posterior wall (PWI), Group 2: PVI+ scar homogenization and Group 3: PVI+PWI+ ablation of sustained non-PV triggers. LA scar (<0.5 mV) was identified by 3-D voltage mapping in sinus rhythm. Freedom from arrhythmia recurrence at 1 year and acute procedure-success, defined as AF termination (organization to AT or conversion to sinus rhythm), were compared across the groups Results: A total of 62 patients were randomized to group 1: 22, group 2: 19 and group 3: 21. Eight (36.3%) in group 1 and 9 (47.3%) in group 2 failed to achieve acute procedural success and underwent PVI+PWI+NPV trigger ablation. Acute success was achieved in all (100%) group 3 patients. Acute procedure failure or recurrence of arrhythmia at 1 year was reported in 54.5% (12/22) in group 1, 68.4% (13/19) group 2 and 28.6% (6/21) in group 3. Compared to group 3, the combined failure rate was significantly higher in group 2 (Chi-Square p= 0.011, Odds ratio 5.42 (95% CI 1.40 to 20.97), p=0.014). Conclusion: In patients with non-paroxysmal AF, PVI+ scar homogenization was associated with significantly lower success rate compared to the ablation strategy targeting PV+ posterior wall +non-PV triggers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We aimed to assess the prevalence of ischemic brain lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and their association with cognitive function 3 months after first-time ablation using continuous oral anticoagulation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).Methods: We performed a prespecified analysis of the AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial (Anticoagulation Using the Direct Factor Xa Inhibitor Apixaban During Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation: Comparison to Vitamin K Antagonist Therapy), which randomized 674 patients with AF 1:1 to uninterrupted apixaban or vitamin K antagonist therapy before first-time ablation. Brain magnetic resonance imaging using fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging was obtained within 3 to 48 hours after AF ablation in all eligible patients enrolled in 25 study centers in Europe and the United States. Patients underwent cognitive assessment 3 to 6 weeks before ablation and 3 months after ablation using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).Results: In 84 (26.1%) of 321 patients with analyzable magnetic resonance imaging, high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging detected at least 1 acute brain lesion, including 44 (27.2%) patients treated with apixaban and 40 (24.8%) patients treated with vitamin K antagonist (P=0.675). Median MoCA score was similar in patients with or without acute brain lesions at 3 months after ablation (28 [interquartile range (IQR), 26-29] versus 28 [IQR, 26-29]; P=0.948). Cerebral chronic white matter damage (defined as Wahlund score ≥4 points) detected by fluid-attenuated inversion recovery was present in 130 (40.5%) patients and associated with lower median MoCA scores before ablation (27 [IQR, 24-28] versus 27 [IQR, 25-29]; P=0.026) and 3 months after ablation (27 [IQR, 25-29] versus 28 [IQR, 26-29]; P=0.011). This association was no longer significant when adjusted for age and sex. Age was associated with lower MoCA scores before ablation (relative risk, 1.02 per 10 years [95% CI, 1.01-1.03]) and 3 months after ablation (relative risk, 1.02 per 10 years [95% CI, 1.01-1.03]).Conclusions: Chronic white matter damage as well as acute ischemic lesions detected by brain magnetic resonance imaging were found frequently after first-time ablation for paroxysmal AF using uninterrupted oral anticoagulation. Acute ischemic brain lesions detected by high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging were not associated with cognitive function at 3 months after ablation. Lower MoCA scores before and after ablation were associated only with older age, highlighting the safety of AF ablation on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation.Registration: URL: https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02227550. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Catheter ablation of the specialized atrioventricular junction (AVJ) with a right-side approach is an effective therapy for refractory atrial fibrillation with fast ventricular rate. Our aim is to assess the efficacy of the procedure in a single center experience and investigate the histologic findings of AVJ after catheter ablation. A) Analysis of AVJ ablation efficacy in a consecutive series of patients with refractory atrial fibrillation; B) Histopathologic study of the conduction system by serial section technique and clinical-electrophysiologic correlation in four patients who underwent AVJ ablation. A) Right-sided AVJ ablation was successful in all 87 consecutive patients (mean procedural time 19.2±17.9 min). Energy applications ranged from 1 to 27 (mean 5.8±5.1) with eight patients (9%) requiring > 15 applications. B) Fibrotic disruption of atrioventricular (AV) node and/or His bundle interruption was found in three cases with previous AVJ ablation. In the case requiring a left side approach, the compact AV node and common His bundle appeared undamaged whereas extensive fibrosis of the summit of the ventricular septum, branching His bundle and proximal bundle branches was found. Noteworthy, a continuity between the septal and anterior tricuspid valve leaflets was present. Our data confirm that the ideal site for ablation of the specialized AVJ is the AV node. In selected cases with unsuccessful AV node ablation, a shift towards the His bundle is needed. A continuity between the septal and anterior leaflets of the tricuspid valve may protect the His bundle as to require multiple shocks and prolong the procedure. • Catheter ablation of the AVJ with a right-side approach is an effective therapy for refractory atrial fibrillation • The ideal site for ablation of the specialized AVJ is the AV node to preserve the automaticity distal to the site of interruption thus preventing PM dependence. • In cases with unsuccessful AV node ablation, a shift towards the His bundle is needed. • A continuity between the septal and anterior leaflets of the tricuspid valve may protect the His bundle as to require multiple shocks and prolong the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Left ventricular (LV) lead positioning at the site of delayed electrical activation is associated with better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We hypothesized that a long electrical conduction delay between right ventricular (RV) and coronary sinus (CS) leads during RV pacing (RLD index) is correlated with a better clinical outcome Methods and results RLD is measured intraprocedurally, during RV pacing, as the time interval between the intracardiac electrograms of RV and CS leads. Initially, we did a prove-of-concept, feasibility, acute study in 97 patients who underwent CRT implantation. The CS lead position was assessed in the 40° right anterior oblique and 40° left anterior oblique views and assigned to one of 11 prespecified segments of a schematic eyeball depiction of the LV walls. Acute outcomes were QRS width during biventricular (BIV) pacing. The longest RLD were found in the basal and mid lateral segments; these accounted for 82% and 78%, respectively, of the total QRS width (%RLD). %RLD was inversely correlated with BIV-paced QRS (P = 0.0001). A similar slope was present either in the 78 patients with preserved atrioventricular (AV) conduction and in the 19 without AV conduction (− 0.34 vs − 0.27, P = 0.7). Conclusion We showed that RLD can be used to guide lead placement at the time of CRT implantation and that it is correlated with BIV-QRS width, an indirect predictor of clinical outcome. Based on these findings we started the prospective, multicenter Optimal Pacing SITE 2 (OPSITE 2) trial with the objective to demonstrate a relationship between RLD and clinical outcomes assessed as death, hospitalization for heart failure, New York Heart Association class, and clinical composite score. The protocol is provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely performed before atrial fibrillation (AF) transcatheter ablation to exclude the presence of left atrial (LA) or LA appendage (LAA) thrombi. The aim of the study is to evaluate if easily accessible clinical parameters may relate to the presence of LA or LAA thrombi to identify patients who could potentially avoid TEE. Methods and results Between January 2012 and September 2014, data from 1539 consecutive patients undergoing TEE, as a work-up before AF transcatheter ablation, in six large volume centers were collected. Baseline clinical features, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, transthoracic echocardiography and presence of thrombi at TEE were recorded. Exclusion criteria were valvular, hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy, previous heart surgery or an ejection fraction ≤ 35%. Mean age was 59.6 ± 10.4 years, 1215 (78.9%) were males; 951 (62.9%) presented in sinus rhythm (SR) on admission, 324 (21.1%) had undergone at least one previous ablation and 900 (58.5%) had CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 0–1. Thrombi were encountered in 12 patients (0.8%). SR at TEE independently related to the absence of thrombi (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.38–19.02, p = 0.015); in addition to this, no patient with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 0–1 and SR on admission presented thrombi at TEE (specificity 100%, p = 0.011). Conclusion In a selected population of patients referred for AF ablation, LA/LAA thrombi prevalence is low. No patients in SR with CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score 0–1 presented LAA thrombi at TEE, identifying a significant subset of patients who could potentially safely be spared from pre-procedural TEE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Benefits of PVI in Patients with Atrial Flutter Background This study examined incidence of AF following cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation alone or CTI plus prophylactic pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients presenting with isolated atrial flutter (AFL) with no history of AF. Methods and Results We enrolled 216 patients with isolated typical atrial flutter and randomized them to CTI alone (group 1, n = 108, 61.2 ± 9.7 year, 75% male) or CTI+PVI ablation (group 2, n = 108, 62.4 ± 9.3 year, 73% male). Insertible loop recorder (ILR) was implanted in 21 and 19 patients from groups 1 and 2, respectively. Remaining patients were monitored with event recorders, ECG, 7-day Holter. Follow-up period was for 18 ± 6 months. Compared to group 1, group 2 had significantly longer procedural duration (75.9 ± 33 min vs. 161 ± 48 min [P < 0.001]) and fluoroscopy time (15.9 ± 12.3 min vs. 56.4+21 min [P < 0.001]). At the end of follow-up, 65 (60.2%) in group 1 and 77 (71.3%) in group 2 were arrhythmia free off-AAD (log-rank P = 0.044). A subgroup analysis was performed with 55 year age cut-off. In the <55 age group the CTI only population had similar success as in CTI+PVI, (21 of 24 [83.3%] vs. 19 of 22 [86.4%], respectively, log-rank P = 0.74). In the ≥55 group, having CTI+PVI showed significantly higher success compared to CTI only; 45 of 84 (53.6%) were AF/AT free in CTI only group versus 58 of 86 (67.4%) with CTI+PVI (log-rank P = 0.029). Conclusion Prophylactic PVI reduced new-onset AF in patients with lone atrial flutter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite catheter ablation (CA) has become an accepted treatment option for symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF), safety of this procedure continues to be cause for concern. Objective: Aim of the present multicenter study was to assess the influence of age and gender on incidence and severity of early CA complications. Methods: From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, data from 2,323 consecutive patients who underwent CA (mean age 59.1+10.9; 72.3% male) for AF in 29 Italian centres were collected. All complications occurring to the patients from admission to 30th post-procedural day were recorded. Results: Complications occurred in 94 patients (4.0%); of these 7 (0.30%) developed permanent sequelae. There was a significant trend toward a greater incidence of complications with increasing age-group. In particular, the incidence of complications was 35/1066 (3.3%) in patients < 60 year-old vs 59/1257 (4.7%) in those > 60 year-old (p=0.03). All 7 patients with permanent sequeale were older than 60. Females had a higher incidence of complications both among younger [13/231 (5.6%) vs 22/915 (2.5%), p=0.02] and older patients [32/405 (7.9%) vs 27/739 (3.5%) p=0.001]. In subjects older than 60, 5/405 (1.2%) females and 2/176 (0.3%) males (p=0.04) suffered from permanent sequelae. Conclusions: Older patients and females are a subgroup at higher risk of complications during AF ablation. A particular care should be taken when performing CA in this clinical setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Safety of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Introduction Despite catheter ablation (CA) becoming an accepted treatment option for symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation (AF), safety of this procedure continues to be cause for concern. Aim of the present multicenter registry was to assess the incidence of early CA complications and detect their predictors in a contemporary, unselected AF population Methods and Results From January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011, data from 2,323 consecutive patients who underwent CA (median age 60 [52-67]; 72.3% male) for AF in 29 Italian centers were collected. All major complications occurring to the patient from admission to 30th postprocedural day were recorded. No procedure-related death was observed. Major complications occurred in 94 patients (4.0%): 50 patients (2.2%) suffered vascular access complications; 12 patients (0.5%) developed cardiac tamponade; 14 patients (0.6%) presented with pericarditis; 5 patients (0.2%) had transient ischemic attack; 4 patients had stroke; 3 patients (0.1%) had phrenic nerve paralysis; 3 patients (0.1%) had hemothorax. Other isolated but serious adverse events were documented in 3 patients (0.1%). Female gender (OR 2.643; 95% CI 1.686-4.143; P < 0.0001) and longer procedural duration (OR 2.195; 95% CI 1.388-3.473; P < 0.001) independently predicted a higher risk of complications. Conclusion Major complications occurred in 4.0% of the CA procedures for AF, with vascular access complications being the most frequent events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a clinical trial which examined the effects of pulmonary-vein isolation and atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing in patients with symptomatic, drug-resistant atrial fibrillation with an ejection fraction of 40% or less, and New York Heart Association class II or II heart failure. Patients were monitored over a 6 month period for symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation. An improved score for the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire along with a longer 6-month-walk distance and higher ejection fraction were reported for the group that underwent pulmonary-vein isolation. The researchers concluded that pulmonary-vein isolation was superior to atrioventricular-node ablation with biventricular pacing.

Background: Antithrombotic therapy (AT) after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) has the purpose of preventing device related thrombosis (DRT), avoiding embolic events; nevertheless, the correct antithrombotic regimen after LAAO is still under debate., Aims: Aim of this substudy of the observational LOGIC registry was to describe the efficacy and safety of a light antithrombotic regimen, comprising single antiplatelet therapy or none, compared to a standard antithrombotic regimen, after a successful LAAO., Methods: Patients with NVAF that underwent LAAO were previously included in the LOGIC registry. Patients receiving single or no AT were considered as light therapy group, while other regimen were considered as standard regimen group. Outcomes of interest were death from any causes and cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack and systemic embolization, any bleeding and major bleeding at 12 months., Results: Six hundred and twenty-eight patients were considered in the analysis, 31.4 % received a light antithrombotic regimen. There were no differences in overall and cardiovascular mortality (5.1 % Vs 6.7 %, p = 0.426 and 2.0 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.553 respectively). Cerebrovascular stroke and transient ischemic attack were similar between the two groups (1.5 % Vs 1.4 %, p = 0.898 and 1.5 % Vs 1.3 %, p = 0.847). Light regimen was not associated with an increased rate of systemic embolism (1.0 % Vs 0.7 %, p = 0.447 and HR 0.88 [95 % CI: 0.34-2.27; p = 0.79]). A light AT regimen did not affect bleeding events being not different between the two groups (HR 0.71; 95 % CI: 0.33-1.59; p = 0.41)., Conclusions: An AT regimen based on single or no antithrombotic therapy after LAAO seems to be safe in patients with high-bleeding risk, without increasing cerebrovascular or peripheral ischemic events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent data on pulsed field ablation (PFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation suggest a progressive reduction in procedural times. Real-world data regarding the relationship between the learning curve of PFA and clinical outcomes are scarce. The objective was to evaluate the PFA learning curve and its impact on acute outcomes., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation with the FARAPULSE™ PFA system were included in a prospective, non-randomized multicenter study. Procedural times were stratified on the operators' learning curve. Comparative analysis of skin-to-skin time was conducted with radiofrequency (RF) and cryoablation (CB) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedures performed by the same operators in the previous year., Results: Among 752 patients, 35.1% were females, and 66.9% had paroxysmal AF; mean age was 62.2 ± 10 years. A total of 62.5% of procedures were performed by operators with > 20 PFA procedures. Both time to PVI (25.6 ± 10 min vs 16.5 ± 8, p < 0.0001) and fluoroscopy time (19.8 ± 8 min vs 15.9 ± 8 min, p = 0.0045) significantly improved after 10 associated with consistent linear trend towards procedural time reduction (R 2 0.92-0.68 across various procedural metrics). Current PFA skin-to-skin time was lower than the historical skin-to-skin one in 217 (62.4%) procedures; it was similar in 112 (32.2%) cases and higher than the historical skin-to-skin one in 19 (5.5%). No major complications were reported., Conclusions: In this nationwide multicentric experience, the novel PFA system proved to be fast, safe, and acutely effective in both paroxysmal and persistent AF patients. The learning curve appears to be rapid, as improvements in procedural parameters were observed after only a few procedures., Clinical Trial Registration: Advanced TecHnologies For SuccEssful AblatioN of AF in Clinical Practice (ATHENA). URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ Identifier: NCT05617456., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval: This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The locally appointed Ethics Committee approved the research protocol. Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Consent for publication: Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data. Competing interests: M.M and A.V.P. are employees of Boston Scientific. S.B. and P.R. received teaching and proctor’s fees and honoraria from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. A.B. and M.P. received teaching and proctor’s fees and honoraria from Boston Scientific. G.F. is a clinical proctor for Boston Scientific. C.T. received speaker’s and proctor’s fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, and Biosense Webster. He serves in the Advisory Board of Medtronic, Boston Scientific. S.B. and P.R. received speaker’s and proctor’s fees from Boston Scientific and Medtronic. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: Oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is often contraindicated in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) because of the high hemorrhagic risk. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can prevent thromboembolic events while avoiding long-term anticoagulation. However, a short period of antithrombotic therapy (AT) is still recommended after LAAO, and, therefore, it is unclear whether patients with CAA can be candidates for LAAO. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of LAAO in patients with CAA and AF., Methods: In this sub-study of the LOGIC (Left atrial appendage Occlusion in patients with Gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) registry, the authors considered only patients with previous intracranial (IC) bleeding, and patients with CAA were compared with patients who did not have CAA. Outcomes of interest were death from any causes and cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack and systemic embolization, and any bleeding and major bleeding at 12 months., Results: The analysis included 270 patients, 49 (18%) of whom had CAA. Patients with CAA were more frequently discharged without AT after LAAO compared with patients who did not have CAA (36.7% vs 6.8%, P less than .001), and this was confirmed at the 1-year follow-up (30.4% vs 14.1%, P = .001). There were no significant differences in all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, or ischemic or hemorrhagic endpoints at 1 and 12 months., Conclusions: LAAO seems to be safe and effective in reducing both ischemic and hemorrhagic risk in patients with AF and CAA. Although patients with CAA are more likely to be discharged without AT after LAAO, there are no significant differences in ischemic and hemorrhagic outcomes compared with patients with a history of IC bleeding from other causes.

Atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs) and subclinical atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequently registered in asymptomatic patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs). While an increased risk of thromboembolic events (e.g., stroke) and benefits from anticoagulation have been widely assessed in the setting of clinical AF, concerns persist about optimal clinical management of subclinical AF/AHREs. As a matter of fact, an optimal threshold of subclinical episodes' duration to predict stroke risk is still lacking and recently published randomized clinical trials assessing the impact of anticoagulation on thromboembolic events in this specific setting have shown contrasting results. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding classification and clinical impact of subclinical AF/AHREs and to discuss the latest evidence regarding the potential benefit of anticoagulation in this setting, highlighting which clinical questions are still unanswered., Competing Interests: The author declares no conflict of interest. Roberto De Ponti, Vincenzo Russo and Matteo Anselmino are serving as one of the Guest editors of this journal. Giuseppe Boriani is serving as Editor-in-Chief of this journal. We declare that Roberto De Ponti, Vincenzo Russo, Matteo Anselmino and Giuseppe Boriani had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Bernard Belhassen. MA is consultant for Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific, clinical proctor for Medtronic, and has received educational grants from Abbott; RDP has received honoraria for lecture and scientific collaboration from Biosense Webster and Medtronic; MZ received speaker’s fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific, Biotronik; MC received speaker’s fees from Abbott and Biosense Webster; GB reported speaker’s fees of small amount from Bayer, Boston, Boehringer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Janssen, Sanofi outside the submitted work. None of the above-mentioned conflicts relates to the topic of this manuscript., (Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly employed in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures, with the potential to enhance procedural efficacy. Nevertheless, there is currently a lack of evidence assessing the impact of ICE on the efficiency, effectiveness, and safety outcomes in the context of novel pulsed-field ablation (PFA) for AF., Purpose: We aimed to assess whether the use of ICE could improve procedural parameters in a large population undergoing AF ablation with FARAPULSE™ catheter., Methods: Consecutive patients who had undergone PFA of AF from nine Italian centers were included. In procedures where the ICE catheter was employed for guidance (ICE-guided group), it was used to maneuver the PFA catheter within the left atrium to achieve optimal contact with atrial structures., Results: We analyzed 556 patients: 357 (66%) with paroxysmal AF, 499 (89.7%) de novo PVI. ICE-guided procedures (n = 138) were propensity matched with patients with a standard approach (n = 138), and their outcomes were compared. During ICE-guided procedures, no improvement in procedural metrics was recorded (ICE vs Standard, 23 ± 6 min vs 18.5 ± 9 min for time to PVI, p < 0.0001; 38.8 ± 7 vs 32.5 ± 5 number of PFA deliveries to achieve PVI, p < 0.0001; 68.8 ± 19 min vs 71.8 ± 29 min for primary operator time, p = 0.5301; 16.1 ± 8 min vs 18.2 ± 10 min for fluoroscopy time, p = 0.5476) except for support time (76.8 ± 26 min vs 91.4 ± 37 min, p = 0.0046). No major procedure-related adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Our findings confirmed that PFA could be consistently performed in a rapid, safe, and efficacious manner. The use of ICE to guide PFA was not associated with an improvement in procedural metrics., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) represents an effective heart failure treatment, associated with reduction in mortality and heart failure hospitalizations. This Italian survey aimed to address relevant CRT issues., Methods: An online survey was administered to AIAC members., Results: One hundred and five electrophysiologists participated, with a median of 40 (23-70) CRT implantations/year (33% in high-volume centres). Forty-five percent of respondents (especially working in high-volume centres) reported an increase in CRT implantations in the last 2 years, in 16% a decrease, and in 38% CRT remained stable. Seventy-five percent of respondents implanted CRT only in patients with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) class I indications. All operators collected ECG and echocardiography before implantation. Eighty-five percent of respondents selected coronary sinus target vein empirically, whereas 10% used mechanical and/or electrical delay techniques. Physicians working in high-volume centres reported a lower failure rate compared with others (16 vs. 34%; P = 0.03). If the coronary sinus lead could not be positioned in the target branch, 80% placed it in another vein, whereas 16% opted for a surgical approach or for conduction system pacing (CSP). Eighty percent accomplished CRT optimization in all patients, 17% only in nonresponders. Regarding anticoagulation, high agreement with EHRA guidelines emerged., Conclusion: CRT represents a valid therapeutic option in heart failure treatment. Nowadays, CRT implantations remain stable and are mainly performed in patients with class I indications. ECG remains the preferred tool for patient selection, whereas imaging is increasingly used to determine the left pacing target area. In most patients, the left ventricular lead can be successfully positioned in the target vein, but in some cases, the result can be unsatisfactory; however, the decision to explore alternative resynchronization approaches is rarely pursued., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), for which pre-clinical and early-stage clinical data are suggestive of some degree of preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation without damage to adjacent structures. Here in the MANIFEST-17K study we assessed the safety of PFA by studying the post-approval use of this treatment modality. Of the 116 centers performing post-approval PFA with a pentaspline catheter, data were received from 106 centers (91.4% participation) regarding 17,642 patients undergoing PFA (mean age 64, 34.7% female, 57.8% paroxysmal AF and 35.2% persistent AF). No esophageal complications, pulmonary vein stenosis or persistent phrenic palsy was reported (transient palsy was reported in 0.06% of patients; 11 of 17,642). Major complications, reported for ~1% of patients (173 of 17,642), were pericardial tamponade (0.36%; 63 of 17,642) and vascular events (0.30%; 53 of 17,642). Stroke was rare (0.12%; 22 of 17,642) and death was even rarer (0.03%; 5 of 17,642). Unexpected complications of PFA were coronary arterial spasm in 0.14% of patients (25 of 17,642) and hemolysis-related acute renal failure necessitating hemodialysis in 0.03% of patients (5 of 17,642). Taken together, these data indicate that PFA demonstrates a favorable safety profile by avoiding much of the collateral damage seen with conventional thermal ablation. PFA has the potential to be transformative for the management of patients with AF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aims: Left atrial catheter ablation is well established in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) but associated with risk of embolism to the brain. The present analysis aims to assess the impact of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) slice thickness on the rate of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected ischaemic brain lesions after ablation., Methods and Results: AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial (NCT02227550) participants underwent MRI using high-resolution (hr) DWI (slice thickness: 2.5-3 mm) and standard DWI (slice thickness: 5-6 mm) within 3-48 h after ablation. In 321 patients with analysable brain MRI (mean age 64 years, 33% female, median CHA2DS2-VASc 2), hrDWI detected at least one acute brain lesion in 84 (26.2%) patients and standard DWI in 60 (18.7%; P < 0.01) patients. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging detected more lesions compared to standard DWI (165 vs. 104; P < 0.01). The degree of agreement for lesion confirmation using hrDWI vs. standard DWI was substantial (κ = 0769). Comparing the proportion of DWI-detected lesions, lesion distribution, and total lesion volume per patient, there was no difference in the cohort of participants undergoing MRI at 1.5 T (n = 52) vs. 3 T (n = 269)., Conclusion: The pre-specified AXAFA-AFNET 5 sub-analysis revealed significantly increased rates of MRI-detected acute brain lesions using hrDWI instead of standard DWI in AF patients undergoing ablation. In comparison to DWI slice thickness, MRI field strength had a no significant impact in the trial. Comparing the varying rates of ablation-related MRI-detected brain lesions across previous studies has to consider these technical parameters. Future studies should use hrDWI, as feasibility was demonstrated in the multicentre AXAFA-AFNET 5 trial., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: To compare outcomes of patients who underwent left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and contraindication to anticoagulants due to history of either gastrointestinal (GI) or intracranial (IC) bleeding., Methods: Patients with NVAF that underwent LAAO for GI or IC bleeding from seven centers were included in this observational study. Baseline characteristics, procedural features, and follow-up data were collected, and compared between the two groups. The primary outcomes were incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic events at 12-month., Results: Six hundred twenty-eight patients were included, 57% with previous GI-bleeding, and 43% with previous IC-bleeding. Median CHA 2 DS 2-VASc score was 4 (interquartile range [IQRs]: 3-5) for both GI-bleeding and IC-bleeding patients, while GI-bleeding patients had a higher HAS-BLED score (4 [IQRs: 3-4] vs. 3 [IQRs]: 2-3]; p = 0.001). At 12-month follow-up, relative risk reduction for stroke was similar between the two groups. The GI-bleeding group had more hemorrhagic events compared to IC-bleeding group (any bleeding 8.4% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.012; major bleeding BARC 3-5: 4.3% vs. 1.8; p = 0.010). At multivariate analysis history of GI bleeding was an independent predictor of hemorrhagic events (adjusted HR: 2.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-5.63; p = 0.047)., Conclusions: Outcomes after LAAO may be affected by the different indications for the procedure. In our study, GI-bleeding and IC-bleeding as indication to LAAO differ in their baseline characteristics. LAAO confirms its efficacy in ischemic risk reduction in both groups, while GI bleeding seems to be an independent predictor of bleeding recurrence at 12 months behind the antithrombotic regimen., (© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. According to current guidelines, cardioverter defibrillator implantation, antiarrhythmic drugs, and catheter ablation are established therapies in the management of ventricular arrhythmias but their efficacy is limited in some cases. Sustained ventricular tachycardia can be terminated by cardioverter-defibrillator therapies although shocks in particular have been demonstrated to increase mortality and worsen patients' quality of life. Antiarrhythmic drugs have important side effects and relatively low efficacy, while catheter ablation, even if it is actually an established treatment, is an invasive procedure with intrinsic procedural risks and is frequently affected by patients' hemodynamic instability. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation for ventricular arrhythmias was developed as bail-out therapy in patients unresponsive to traditional treatments. Radiotherapy has been mainly applied in the oncological field, but new current perspectives have developed in the field of ventricular arrhythmias. Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation provides an alternative non-invasive and painless therapeutic strategy for the treatment of previously detected cardiac arrhythmic substrate by three-dimensional intracardiac mapping or different tools. Since preliminary experiences have been reported, several retrospective studies, registries, and case reports have been published in the literature. Although, for now, stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation is considered an alternative palliative treatment for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia and no other therapeutic options, this research field is currently extremely promising.

Introduction: Coagulopathy, in the form of either venous or arterial thromboembolism, is one of the most severe sequelae of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, the role of therapeutic anticoagulation (tAC) or prophylactic anticoagulation (pAC) in COVID-19 patients has not been definitely established. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to gather all the available real-world data in the field and to provide a reliable effect size of the effect on mortality of tAC compared to pAC in COVID-19 patients., Evidence Acquisition: Real-world studies (RWS) were identified by searching electronic databases from inception to 31 st October, 2021. Randomized controlled trials were excluded. Mortality and bleedings were considered as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively., Evidence Synthesis: 10 RWS and 5541 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, tAC was associated with lower mortality (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.54-0.71). There was asymmetry at the funnel plot suggesting publication bias, that was not confirmed at the Egger test (P=0.07). For the secondary endpoint, there was a non-statistically significant tendency for more bleedings in patients treated with tAC compared to pAC (RR=1.75, 95% CI: 0.81-3.81)., Conclusions: Our meta-analysis, based on RWS and adjusted estimates of risk, suggests a survival benefit of tAC over pAC in COVID-19 patients in the real world.

Advancing age of the global population is one of the main reasons for the uprising trend in atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence worldwide leading to a proper "AF epidemic". Strictly related to the increasing prevalence of AF in the elderly is the relevant burden of cardiac end extra-cardiac comorbidities that these patients show. Patients with AF are frequently asymptomatic (i.e., asymptomatic or silent AF) and thus the arrhythmia is generally underdiagnosed. Detainment of proper treatment in elderly and comorbid patients may potentially result in significant morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in recent years, several screening strategies (systematic vs opportunistic screening) for asymptomatic AF have been developed and early diagnosis of AF is an important treatment goal that can improve prognosis. This review will focus on the prevalence of asymptomatic AF in the elderly, frequently associated comorbidities, screening strategies, and implications for a correct AF diagnosis.

Arterial stiffness (AS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) share commonalities in molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms and numerous studies have analyzed their reciprocal influence. The gold standard for AS diagnosis is represented by aortic pulse wave velocity, whose measurement can be affected by arrhythmias characterized by irregularities in heart rhythm, such as AF. Growing evidence show that patients with AS are at high risk of AF development. Moreover, the subset of AF patients with AS seems to be more symptomatic and rhythm control strategies are less effective in this population. Reducing AS through de-stiffening interventions may be beneficial for patients with AF and can be a new appealing target for the holistic approach of AF management. In this review, we discuss the association between AS and AF, with particular interest in shared mechanisms, clinical implications and therapeutic options., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)