Search

Minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for different patient outcome scores have been reported for various shoulder diseases, including shoulder arthroplasty and the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the MCID for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and a visual analog scale (VAS) measuring pain, after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A total of 202 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were retrospectively reviewed. ASES, SST, and VAS pain scores were collected preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. The MCID was then calculated via a 4-question anchor–based method. The MCID results for the ASES, SST, and VAS pain scores were 27.1, 4.3, and 2.4, respectively. Age at time of surgery, sex, anteroposterior tear size, and worker's compensation status were not associated with MCID values (P >.05). The MCID values determined in the current study are higher than those previously identified for the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease using the same anchor questions. Use of these higher values should be considered when evaluating improvements of individual patients after rotator cuff repair, to determine comparative effectiveness of various rotator cuff repair techniques and to determine sample sizes for prospective comparative trials of rotator cuff repair methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Large glenoid defects present a challenge during primary and revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) especially when humeral head autograft is not available as a bone graft source. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of RTSA with concomitant structural allografting to reconstruct large glenoid defects. From May 2008 to July 2016, 22 patients underwent primary or revision RTSA with structural glenoid allografting. Of 22 patients, 19 (86%) were available for a minimum 2-year clinical follow-up (average, 2.8 ± 1.3 years), and 17 of 22 (77%) were available for a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up. Functional outcomes, range of motion, radiographic deformity correction, allograft incorporation, and complication rates were determined. From preoperatively to postoperatively, significant improvements in the average Simple Shoulder Test score (2 ± 2 preoperatively vs. 10 ± 8 postoperatively, P =.002), the average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (31 ± 19 preoperatively vs. 70 ± 25 postoperatively, P <.001), and average active forward elevation (71° ± 41° preoperatively vs. 128° ± 28° postoperatively, P <.001) were noted. Coronal-plane radiographic correction was 29° ± 12° as measured with the reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle (P <.001) and 14° ± 11° as measured with the β angle (P <.001). Postoperatively, of 17 patients with a minimum 1-year radiographic follow-up, 14 (82%) had complete radiographic incorporation of the graft. Acromial fracture nonunions developed in 2 patients and loosening and migration of the baseplate were found in 2 patients, although no patients elected to undergo further surgery. RTSA with allograft reconstruction of severe glenoid defects allows restoration of glenoid anatomy and leads to high rates of bony incorporation with low rates of glenoid loosening or requirement for revision. Structural allograft is an excellent alternative to autograft in revision RTSA to avoid graft-site morbidity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine, in the context of measuring bone loss in shoulder instability, whether measurement differences between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), linear-based and area-based methods, and observers altered the proposed treatment when a standardized algorithm was applied.Methods: This was a retrospective, comparative imaging study of preoperative patients with anterior shoulder instability with both an MRI and CT scan within 1 year of one another. On parasagittal images reoriented en face to the glenoid, 2 attending orthopaedic surgeons measured glenoid width, glenoid area, glenoid defect width, and glenoid defect area. On axial images maximal Hill-Sachs width was measured. From these, linear percent glenoid bone loss (%GBL) and area %GBL were calculated, and on-versus off-track was determined. With these results, a recommended treatment was determined by applying a standardized algorithm, in which the Latarjet procedure was selected for %GBL >20%, arthroscopic labral repair and remplissage for off-track lesions with %GBL <20%, and arthroscopic labral repair on-track shoulders with %GBL <20%.Results: In total, 53 patients with mean ± standard deviation 45 ± 83 days between scans were include with a CT linear %GBL of 23.5 ± 9.6% (range 0%-47%). CT lead to larger measurements of %GBL than MRI (linear P = .008, area P = .003), and fewer shoulders being considered on-track (33.0% vs 40.5%), which would alter treatment in 25% to 34%. Linear measurements produced larger values for %GBL (CT, P < .001; MRI, P < .001), which would alter treatment in 25%. For %GBL, inter-rater reliability was good, with intraclass correlation coefficients varying from 0.727 to 0.832 and Kappa varying from 0.57 to 0.62, but these inter-rater differences would alter treatment in 31%.Conclusions: The significant differences in bone loss measurement between imaging modality, measurement method, and observers may lead to differences in treatment in up to 34% of cases. Linear CT measurements resulted in the most aggressive treatment recommendations.Level Of Evidence: Retrospective Comparative Study: Diagnostic, Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative skin preparation with hydrogen peroxide reduces intraoperative culture positivity for Cutibacterium acnes in shoulder arthroplasty. This was a prospective, controlled, parallel/noncrossover, nonrandomized, single-blinded trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov. We included a consecutive series of patients scheduled to undergo primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The first group of patients underwent a standard skin preparation and the second group underwent the same preparation with the addition of hydrogen peroxide. We then took skin, dermis, glenohumeral joint, and air (negative control) aerobic and anaerobic culture swabs. We blinded the laboratory analyzing the samples. An a priori power analysis determined that 56 patients would be needed to see a 50% reduction in culture positivity rates. We also conducted a post hoc gender-stratified analysis. Between January 2017 and October 2018, the authors performed 124 primary shoulder arthroplasties, of which we included 65 and collected samples on 61. There were no demographic differences. There were fewer patients within the peroxide group with triple-positive cultures (skin, dermis, and joint) (0% vs. 19%, P =.024) and positive cultures from the joint (10% vs. 35%, P =.031). In our subgroup analysis, these differences were only significant in males. The vast majority of positive cultures were with C. acnes. Although larger, randomized studies are needed, adding hydrogen peroxide to the preoperative skin preparation may be a low-cost, low-risk method to reduce deep tissue contamination with C. acnes , particularly within males. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It remains unclear whether changes in scapular rotation influence the surgeon's ability to achieve resting radiographic neutral or inferior baseplate tilt at final follow-up. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine whether reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) changes the resting scapular rotation, (2) to determine the association between glenoid inclination with respect to the scapula (β angle) and resting scapular rotation, and (3) to determine the β angle threshold that will most likely lead to resting radiographic neutral or inferior baseplate tilt relative to the thorax. This was a retrospective radiographic study. Patients with adequate-quality standing anteroposterior and Grashey radiographs obtained preoperatively and after primary RTSA at a minimum of 1 year were included. Glenoid inclination (β angle) was measured between the supraspinatus fossa and the glenoid. Resting scapular rotation was measured between the supraspinatus fossa and a vertical line. Baseplate tilt was then calculated as the angle between the glenoid and a vertical line. The study included 74 patients with a mean follow-up period of 3 years (range, 1-9 years). Scapular rotation changed 2° ± 12° (mean ± standard deviation) into upward rotation (P =.048). No association was found between the β angle and scapular rotation. In 71% of patients with a neutral or inferior baseplate tilt, a postoperative β angle greater than 85° was found. Resting radiographic scapular rotation changed 2° into upward rotation with RTSA and was not associated with the β angle. If the β angle is greater than 85°, resting radiographic baseplate tilt will most likely be inferior or neutral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with variation in direct costs with shoulder arthroplasty. This was a retrospective study of all shoulder arthroplasties performed at a single facility between July 1, 2011, and November 30, 2016. We collected patient factors, indications, procedure (including implant details), implant brand (A, B, and other), and complications. We collected direct costs over a 90-day period using a validated internal tool. We identified patient and procedure characteristics associated with costs using multivariable generalized linear models. A total of 361 patients were included, 19% with revision arthroplasty procedures, 32% with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, and 66% with reverse total shoulder arthroplasties (RTSAs). Of total costs, 13% were operative facility utilization costs and 58% were operative supply costs. Factors associated with increased total cost included younger age (P =.002) and an indication for surgery of other, that is, not osteoarthritis, a failed arthroplasty, or the sequelae of a rotator cuff tear (P =.030). Factors associated with increased operative costs included younger age (P =.002), use of an RTSA (P <.001), use of a bone graft (P <.001), implant brand B (P =.098), implant brands other than A and B (P =.04), the sequelae of a rotator cuff tear as an indication for surgery (P =.041), or an indication for surgery of other (P =.007). Most short-term (90-day) costs with shoulder arthroplasty are operative costs. Nonmodified factors associated with increased cost included younger age and less common indications for surgery, whereas potentially modifiable factors included the intraoperative use of a bone graft, implant brand, and RTSA use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shoulder arthroplasty has advanced considerably in recent decades, but the most recently published long-term outcomes continue to have unacceptably high failure rates, especially in young patients. However, there are several future frontiers that offer the promise of improved implant longevity and function including advances in surgical approach, such as subscapularis-sparing approaches and computer-assisted surgical planning; advances in humeral component fixation, such as stemless, short-stem, and convertible implants; advances in bearing surfaces, such as pyrocarbon, ceramic, and metal-on-metal; and advances in glenoid component geometry and fixation, such as augmented components, in-growth pegs, and inlay glenoid components. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Rotator cuff muscle volume is associated with outcomes after cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty. Muscle area on select magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) slices has been shown to be a surrogate for muscle volume. The purpose of this study was to determine whether computed tomography (CT) provides an equivalent measurement of cuff muscle area to a previously validated MRI measurement. Methods We included 30 patients before they were undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty with both preoperative CT and MRI scans performed within 30 days of one another at 1 institution using a consistent protocol. We reoriented CT sagittal and MRI sagittal T1 series orthogonal to the scapular plane. On both CT and MRI scans, we measured the area of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus–teres minor, and subscapularis on 2 standardized slices as previously described. We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients and mean differences. Results For the 30 subjects included, when MRI and CT were compared, the mean intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.989 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.976-0.995) for the supraspinatus, 0.978 (95% CI, 0.954-0.989) for the infraspinatus–teres minor, and 0.977 (95% CI, 0.952-0.989) for the subscapularis. The mean differences were 0.2 cm2 (95% CI, 0.0-0.4 cm2) for the supraspinatus (P =.052), 0.8 cm2 (95% CI, 0.1-1.4 cm2) for the infraspinatus–teres minor (P =.029), and –0.3 cm2 (95% CI, –1.2 to 0.5 cm2) for the subscapularis (P =.407). Conclusion CT provides nearly equivalent measures of cuff muscle area to an MRI technique with previously validated reliability and accuracy. While CT underestimates the infraspinatus area as compared with MRI, the difference is less than 1 cm2 and thus likely clinically insignificant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]