Search

Since the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program for Japanese girls aged 12–16 years began in 2010, vaccination uptake has been low in women born before 1993 but high (approximately 70%) in those born during 1994–1999. We previously compared the prevalence of vaccine types HPV16 and HPV18 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1–3 (CIN1–3) or adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts and found direct protection effects among vaccinated women in Japan. In this study, we focused on changes in HPV16/18 prevalence among "unvaccinated" cohorts with CIN/AIS. We analyzed HPV16/18 prevalence among 5051 unvaccinated women aged <40 years, newly diagnosed with CIN/AIS during 2012–2021 for time trends. Declining trends in HPV16/18 prevalence over 9 years were observed in CIN1 (36.0–10.0%, Ptrend = 0.03) and CIN2–3/AIS (62.5–36.4%, Ptrend = 0.07) among women aged <25 years. HPV16/18 prevalence in CIN1 and CIN2–3/AIS diagnosed at age 20–24 years was lower in 1994–1999 birth cohorts compared with 1988–1993 birth cohorts (4.5% vs. 25.7% for CIN1 and 40.0% vs. 58.1% for CIN2–3/AIS, both p = 0.04). Significant reduction in HPV16/18 prevalence among young unvaccinated women with CIN1 and CIN2–3/AIS suggests herd effects of HPV vaccination in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Uterine carcinosarcomas (UCSs) are rare and aggressive tumors. The prognostic factors are not sufficiently known. Methods: We performed a multi-institutional, retrospective study of women with stage I-IV UCS, diagnosed between 2007 and 2012. Data obtained from medical records included demographic, clinicopathological, treatment, and outcome information. Results: A total of 486 patients (median age 65 years) were identified-224 (46 %) were stage I, 32 (7 %) were stage II, 139 (28 %) were stage III, and 91 (19 %) were stage IV. Among them, 277 (57 %) had disease recurrence. Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 16.4 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 15.7-27.2], and median overall survival (OS) was 72.0 months (95 % CI 43.0-not reached). In total, 454 (94 %) patients received adjuvant treatment, and 440 (91 %) received adjuvant chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, stage III-IV disease, CA-125 level, and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were significantly associated with shorter median DFS. Stage III-IV disease, performance status 2-4, ≥50 % myometrial invasion depth, and postsurgical residual tumor size >1 cm were significantly associated with shorter median OS. Conversely, pelvic lymph node lymphadenectomy was associated with improved DFS and OS. Conclusions: Stage, performance status, CA-125 level, LVSI, and myometrial invasion were associated with poor prognoses. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was associated with improved survival, and may be necessary for the surgical management of UCS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To examine the optimal regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer in Japanese clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a multi-center retrospective cohort study to survey clinical information of 402 patients with stage III or IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer diagnosed by cytopathology of ascites or pleural effusion or histopathological examination. These patients underwent at least three cycles of NACT between January 2007 and December 2016 at participating facilities of Sankai Gynecologic Study Group (SGSG) in Japan. The regimens of NACT included dose-dense TC (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15; and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks), tri-weekly TC (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, days 1; and carboplatin at an AUC of 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks) and weekly TC (paclitaxel 60 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15; and carboplatin at an AUC of 2 on day 1, 8, 15 every 3 weeks). Patients who underwent PDS or NACT regimens other than dose-dense TC or tri-weekly TC or weekly TC and who carried sarcoma components or borderline malignancies were excluded from the study. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival differences were analyzed using the Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test. Multivariate analysis for progression-free survival was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among the 402 eligible patients, the median observation period was 45 (range: 0-167) months. The median age was 63 (range: 34-90) years, and the ECOG performance status was 0-1 for 316 patients (79%), 2-3 for 79 patients (20%), and unknown for seven patients (1%). The FIGO stages were III for 238 patients (59%) and IV for 164 patients (41%). In total, 287 patients (71%) had serous carcinoma, 10 (2%) had mucinous carcinoma, nine (2%) had endometrioid carcinoma, 13 (3%) had clear cell carcinoma, and 80 (20%) had carcinoma not otherwise specified, or unknown. One hundred and eighty-two patients (45%) underwent dose-dense TC, 154 (38%) underwent tri-weekly TC, and 66 (16%) underwent weekly TC. The median progression-free survival (PFS) in dose-dense TC and TC and weekly-TC was 20, 17, and 15 months, respectively (p = 0.03) (See Figure1). Response rate in each group was 90.1%, 85.7%, and 78.8%, respectively (p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis for PFS, there was a trend for improvement in the dose-dense TC group (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.02; p = 0.07). Conclusions: Dose-dense TC was a promising regimen for Japanese patients as NACT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate an association between the gut microbiome and efficacy of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) in ovarian cancer., Methods: This study conducted fecal microbiome analysis (16S rRNA gene sequencing) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling for ovarian cancer patients who underwent PARPi maintenance therapy. Fecal and blood samples were collected at the baseline and the progressive disease (PD) or last follow-up. The relative abundance of gut microbes and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using linear discriminant analysis of effect size and the Cox proportional hazard model according to BRCA1 / 2 mutation ( BRCA1 / 2 mut) status detected by ctDNA sequencing., Results: Baseline samples were available from 23 BRCA1 / 2 mut-positive patients and 33 BRCA1/2 mut-negative patients. The microbes enriched in the baseline samples with long PFS were Bifidobacterium , Roseburia , Dialister , Butyricicoccus , and Bilophila for BRCA1/2 mut-positive patients and Phascolarctobacterium for BRCA1/2 mut-negative patients. In multivariate analyses dividing patients by the median values of relative abundances, no bacteria were associated with PFS in BRCA1/2 mut-positive patients, whereas high Phascolarctobacterium abundances (≥1.11%) was significantly associated with longer PFS in BRCA1/2 mut-negative patients (median 14.0 vs. 5.9 months, hazard ratio=0.28; 95% confidence interval=0.11-0.69; p=0.014). In the last samples, the relative abundances of Phascolarctobacterium were significantly higher in patients without PD (n=5) than those with PD (n=15) (median 1.25% vs. 0.06%; p=0.016)., Conclusion: High fecal composition of Phascolarctobacterium was associated with prolonged PFS in patients with BRCA1/2 mut-negative ovarian cancer receiving PARPi therapy. Our results would provide new insights for future research., Competing Interests: Mika Okazawa-Sakai declares no competing interests. Shunsuke A. Sakai declares no competing interests. Ichinosuke Hyodo reports advisory roles for Asahi-Kasei, Ono, Taiho, Chugai, and Eisai Pharmaceutical Companies. Satoshi Horasawa declares no competing interests. Kentaro Sawada declares no competing interests. Takao Fujisawa reports honoraria from Amelieff Co. Ltd. Yasuko Yamamoto declares no competing interests. Shogen Boku reports honoraria from Nippon Kayaku Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, and MSD. Yoh Hayasaki declares no competing interests. Masanori Isobe declares no competing interests. Daisuke Shintani declares no competing interests. Kosei Hasegawa reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, and Takeda; advisory role for GSK, MSD, and Takeda; research grants from MSD. Tomomi Egawa-Takata declares no competing interests. Kimihiko Ito reports honoraria from AstraZeneca. Kei Ihira declares no competing interests. Hidemichi Watari reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Takeda, MSD, and Chugai. Kazuhiro Takehara reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Takeda, MSD, Chugai, Eisai, and Sanofi. Hiroshi Yagi declares no competing interests. Kiyoko Kato declares no competing interests. Tatsuyuki Chiyoda reports research grants from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company. Kenichi Harano reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eizai, MSD, Taiho and Takeda, and advisory roles for AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eizai, Taiho and Takeda. Yoshiaki Nakamura declares advisory role from Guardant Health Pte Ltd., Natera, Inc., Roche Ltd., Seagen, Inc., Premo Partners, Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Exact Sciences Corporation, Gilead Sciences, Inc.; speakers' bureau from Guardant Health Pte Ltd., MSD K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Merck Biopharma Co., Ltd., CareNet, Inc., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Becton, Dickinson and Company, Guardant Health Japan Corp; research funding from Seagen, Inc., Genomedia Inc., Guardant Health AMEA, Inc., Guardant Health, Inc., Tempus Labs, Inc., Roche Diagnostics K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Riu Yamashita declares no competing interests. Takayuki Yoshino reports honoraria from Chugai Pharma, Takeda Pharma, Merck, Bayer Yakuhin, Ono Pharmaceutical and MSD K. K.; consulting fees from Sumitomo Corp.; and research grants from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, FALCO Biosystems, Genomedia Inc., Medical & Biological Laboratories, Merus N.V., Molecular Health, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono, Pfizer, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Sysmex, Taiho and Takeda. Daisuke Aoki reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, Takeda, MSD, Chugai, and Myriad Genetics., (© 2025. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Background: We previously demonstrated the applicability of the concept of "platinum sensitivity" in recurrent endometrial cancer. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have been widely incorporated into endometrial cancer treatment, the debate continues regarding treatment options in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we assessed the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data from the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study., Methods: Among the 279 participants in the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study wherein platinum-based chemotherapy was re-administered for managing recurrent endometrial cancer between January 2005 and December 2009, 130 (47%) responded to chemotherapy. We compared the relationship between platinum-free interval and duration of secondary platinum-based treatment using pooled data., Results: In 40 patients (31%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded the platinum-free interval. The duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 12 months in 51 patients (39%) [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 14/48 (29%); 12-23 months, 18/43 (42%); 24-35 months, 8/19 (42%); ≥ 36 months, 11/20 (55%)]. In particular, in eight patients (6%), the duration of response to secondary platinum-based treatment exceeded 36 months [platinum-free interval: < 12 months, 3/48 (6%); 12-23 months, 0/19 (0%); 24-35 months, 2/19 (11%); ≥ 36 months, 3/20 (15%)]., Conclusions: Re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy for recurrent endometrial cancer may result in a long-term response exceeding the platinum-free interval in some patients. Even in the current situation, where immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, re-administration of platinum-based chemotherapy is worth considering., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In the phase 3 EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9 study, cemiplimab significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who progressed after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We present a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients enrolled in Japan., Methods: Patients were enrolled regardless of programmed cell death-ligand 1 status and randomized 1:1 to cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or investigator's choice  single-agent chemotherapy for up to 96 weeks. Primary endpoint was OS. Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR)., Results: Overall, 608 patients were randomized, of whom 56 (9.2%) were in Japan (cemiplimab, n = 29; chemotherapy, n = 27). The median (range) duration of follow-up was 13.6 (6.0-25.3) versus 18.2 (6.0-38.2) months for patients in Japan and for the overall population, respectively. Median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 8.4 (7.0-not evaluable) and 9.4 (5.4-14.9) months for cemiplimab versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.43-1.68). Median PFS (95% CI) was 4.0 (1.4-8.2) versus 3.7 (1.8-4.2) months with cemiplimab and chemotherapy (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.50-1.61), respectively. ORR was 17.2% for cemiplimab and 7.4% for chemotherapy (odds ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 0.44-13.99). Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events at any grade was 79.3% for cemiplimab and 100% for chemotherapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events were 37.9% versus 66.7% with cemiplimab and chemotherapy, respectively., Discussion: While acknowledging limitations inherent to a small subgroup analysis, the HR of 0.86 observed in Japanese patients suggests an emerging survival benefit despite a 4.6-month shorter median duration of follow-up versus the overall study population., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of niraparib in Japanese women with heavily pretreated ovarian cancer., Methods: This was the follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with homologous recombination-deficient, platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer who had completed 3-4 lines of chemotherapy and were poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor naïve. Participants received niraparib (starting dose, 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles until objective disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR), as assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)., Results: 20 patients were enrolled in the study and included in both efficacy and safety analyses. Median total study duration was 759.5 days. Median dose intensity was 201.3 mg/day. Confirmed ORR was 60.0% (90% confidence interval [CI]=39.4-78.3); 2 patients had complete response and 10 patients had partial response. Median duration of response was 9.9 months (95% CI=3.9-26.9) and the disease control rate was 90.0% (95% CI=68.3-98.8). The most common TEAEs were anemia (n=15), nausea (n=12), and decreased platelet count (n=11). TEAEs leading to study drug dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation were reported in 16 (80.0%), 15 (75.0%), and 2 patients (10.0%), respectively., Conclusion: The long-term efficacy and safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous findings in the equivalent population in non-Japanese patients. No new safety signals were identified., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759600., Competing Interests: Daisuke Aoki declares the receipt of consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai, MSD, Myriad Genetics, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Tsutomu Tabata declares the receipt of lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Satoshi Yanagida, Toshiaki Nakamura and Hidekatsu Nakai declare the receipt of lecture fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Kenichi Harano declares the receipt of grants from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and speaker fees from Astra Zeneca, Chugai, Eisai, MSD, Taiho, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Kenichi Harano also declares an advisory role for AstraZeneca, Chugai, Taiho and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and receipt of institutional research funding from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Kosei Hasegawa declares the receipt of research grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Genmab, Kaken, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and travel expenses from Regeneron. Kosei Hasegawa is also on the advisory board of Chugai, Eisai, Genmab, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Shinichi Komiyama declares the receipt of consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, and MSD, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eisai, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Kazuhiro Takehara declares the receipt of speaker bureaus fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and manuscript writing fees from MSD. Yoichi Kase and Ai Kato are employees of, and hold stocks in Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Shuuji Sumino and Junpei Soeda are employees of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Ajit Suri is an employee of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, part of Takeda, and holds stocks in Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Aikou Okamoto declares the receipt of honoraria from ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, AstraZeneca, Bayer Holding Ltd, Chugai, Covidien Japan Inc., Eisai, Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd, Johnson & Johnson K.K., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, MSD, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Myriad Genetics G.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Sanofi, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Aikou Okamoto also declares the receipt of institutional grants from ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd, Gyne Mom Co., Ltd, Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Linical Co., Ltd, Meiji Holdings Co., Ltd, Merck BioPharma Japan, Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, MSD, Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, and Tsumura & Co. Other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Background: At the time of AtTEnd trial design, standard treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer included carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. This trial assessed whether combining atezolizumab with chemotherapy might improve outcomes in this population., Methods: AtTEnd was a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done in 89 hospitals in 11 countries across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and Asia. Enrolled patients were aged 18 years or older, and had advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma or carcinosarcoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and received no previous systemic chemotherapy for recurrence. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) using an interactive web response system (block size of six) to either atezolizumab 1200 mg or placebo given intravenously with chemotherapy (carboplatin at area under the curve of 5 or 6 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1 every 21 days) for 6-8 cycles, then continued until progression. Stratification factors were country, histological subtype, advanced or recurrent status, and mismatch repair (MMR) status. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The hierarchically tested co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (in patients with MMR-deficient [dMMR] tumours, and in the overall population) and overall survival (in the overall population). Primary analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned patients who gave their full consent to participation in the study and data processing. Safety was assessed in all patients included in the intention-to-treat population who received at least one dose of study treatment. Here, we report the primary progression-free survival and the interim overall survival results. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03603184., Findings: Between Oct 3, 2018, and Jan 7, 2022, 551 patients were randomly assigned to atezolizumab (n=362) or placebo (n=189). Two patients in the atezolizumab group were excluded from all analyses due to lack of consent. Median follow-up was 28·3 months (IQR 21·2-37·6). 81 (23%) patients in the atezolizumab group and 44 (23%) patients in the placebo group had dMMR disease by central assessment. In the dMMR population, median progression-free survival was not estimable (95% CI 12·4 months-not estimable [NE]) in the atezolizumab group and 6·9 months (6·3-10·1) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·36, 95% CI 0·23-0·57; p=0·0005). In the overall population, median progression-free survival was 10·1 months (95% CI 9·5-12·3) in the atezolizumab group and 8·9 months (8·1-9·6) in the placebo group (HR 0·74, 95% CI 0·61-0·91; p=0·022). Median overall survival was 38·7 months (95% CI 30·6-NE) in the atezolizumab group and 30·2 months (25·0-37·2) in the placebo group (HR 0·82, 95% CI 0·63-1·07; log-rank p=0·048). The p value for the interim analysis of overall survival did not cross the stopping boundary; therefore, the trial will continue until the required number of events are recorded. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (97 [27%] of 356 patients in the atezolizumab group vs 51 [28%] of 185 in the placebo group) and anaemia (49 [14%] vs 24 [13%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 46 (13%) patients in the atezolizumab group and six (3%) patients in the placebo group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in two patients (pneumonia in one patient in each group)., Interpretation: Atezolizumab plus chemotherapy increased progression-free survival in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma, particularly in those with dMMR carcinomas, suggesting the addition of atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment in this specific subgroup., Funding: F Hoffmann-La Roche., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EB, FG, ER, and SU report grants from Roche to their institution to support the conduct of the study. NC reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, Immunogen, Mersana, MSD/Merck, Nuvation Bio, OncXerna, Pieris, Pfizer, Roche, and Novocure; and grants or research support from GSK and AstraZeneca. KH reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eisai, MSD/Merck, Taiho, and Takeda; and grants or research support from MSD/Merck, Chugai, Takeda, AstraZeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo. EH reports personal fees from GSK and Clovis. FM reports personal fees from Roche, Eisai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD/Merck, GSK, Clovis, Gilead, Myriad Genetics, Seagen, and Stemline Menarini; grants or research support from Roche; and participation on data safety monitoring or advisory boards for Immutep, Amgen, and Palleos Healthcare. CM reports personal fees from Roche, Novartis, MSD/Merck, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, PharmaMar, ImmunoGen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novocure, BioNTtech, Eisai, and GSK. LF-M reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD/Merck, Eisai, and Pharma&. YCL reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, and grants or research support from BeiGene. EP reports personal fees from GSK and AstraZeneca. BP reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD/Merck, and Pharma&. CZ reports personal fees from Roche, Eisai, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, QuintilesIMS, Clovis, Eli Lilly, Istituto Gentili, Daiichi Sankyo, Seagen, MSD/Merck, GSK, and Gilead; and grants or research support from Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Eisai, Clovis, Gilead, Seagen, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, and MSD/Merck. KT reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharma, Takeda, MSD/Merck, Nippon Kayaku, Eisai, and Sanofi; and grants or research support from Chugai Pharma. AF reports personal fees from GSK, AstraZeneca, and MSD/Merck. MP reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, GSK, and MSD/Merck. MPBG reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD/Merck, PharmaMar, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, Pharma&, and Kyowa Kirin; and a leadership role for Geico. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Objective: This study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of niraparib in Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer., Methods: This was a follow-up analysis of a phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in Japanese women with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer. Participants received niraparib (starting dose 300 mg) once daily in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events (defined as the overall incidence of the MedDRA Preferred Terms "thrombocytopenia" and "platelet count decreased") occurring in the 30 days after initial administration of niraparib, and secondary endpoints included evaluation of treatment-emergent adverse events and progression-free survival., Results: Nineteen patients (median age, 62 years; median body weight, 53.9 kg) were enrolled. As previously reported, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia-related events during the first 30 days of treatment was 31.6%. At data cutoff, median (range) treatment exposure was 504.0 (56-1,054) days and mean ± standard deviation dose intensity was 154.4±77.5 mg/day. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea (n=14, 73.7%), decreased platelet count (n=12, 63.2%), decreased neutrophil count (n=11, 57.9%), anemia, vomiting, and decreased appetite (all n=9, 47.4%). One patient was diagnosed with treatment-related leukemia, which resulted in death. Median (95% confidence interval) progression-free survival was 18.0 (5.6-26.7) months., Conclusion: Overall, the safety profile of niraparib was considered manageable in this study population of Japanese patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer and was consistent with that observed in studies of non-Japanese patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03759587., Competing Interests: Kosei Hasegawa declares the receipt of research grants from Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd, honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Genmab, Kaken, Kyowa Kirin, MSD, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd, and travel expenses from Regeneron. Kosei Hasegawa is also on the advisory board of Chugai, Eisai, Genmab, MSD, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd. Shoji Nagao declares the receipt of grants from AstraZeneca, consulting fees from AstraZeneca, and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eisai, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals Company Ltd. Kazuhiro Takehara declares the receipt of speaker bureaus fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and manuscript writing fees from MSD. Hidekatsu Nakai and Hidemichi Watari declare the receipt of lecture fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Shuuji Sumino is an employee of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Yoichi Kase and Ai Kato are employees of, and hold stocks in Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Ajit Suri is an employee of Millennium Pharmaceuticals, part of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd, and holds stocks in Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Other authors have no conflict of interest to disclose., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) affects the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients at post-operative risk of recurrence., Methods: JGOG2043 was a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of three chemotherapeutic regimens as adjuvant therapy in EC patients with post-operative recurrent risk. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in JGOG2043. The number of resected and positive nodes and other clinicopathologic risk factors for survival were retrieved., Results: There were 83 patients in the group with less than 20 PLNs removed (group A), while 167 patients had 20 or more PLNs removed (group B). There was no significant difference in patients' backgrounds between the two groups, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was not significantly different. There was a trend toward fewer pelvic recurrences in group B compared with group A (3.5% vs. 9.6%; p=0.050). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (5-year overall survival [OS]=90.3% vs. 84.3%; p=0.199), multivariate analysis revealed that resection of 20 or more nodes is one of the independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval=0.24-0.99; p=0.048), as well as surgical stage, high-risk histology, and advanced age for OS., Conclusion: Resection of 20 or more PLNs was associated with improved pelvic control and better survival outcomes in EC patients at risk of recurrence who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone and were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2025. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Purpose: TAS-117 is a highly potent and selective, oral, allosteric pan-AKT inhibitor under development for advanced/metastatic solid tumors. The safety, clinical pharmacology, pharmacogenomics and efficacy were investigated., Methods: This phase I, open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalating, first-in-human study enrolled patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors and comprised three phases (dose escalation phase [DEP], regimen modification phase [RMP], and safety assessment phase [SAP]). The SAP dose and regimen were determined in the DEP and RMP. Once-daily and intermittent dosing (4 days on/3 days off, 21-day cycles) were investigated. The primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in Cycle 1 of the DEP and RMP and incidences of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the SAP. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenomics, and antitumor activity., Results: Of 66 enrolled patients, 65 received TAS-117 (DEP, n = 12; RMP, n = 10; SAP, n = 43). No DLTs were reported with 24-mg/day intermittent dosing, which was selected as a recommended dose in SAP. In the SAP, 98.5% of patients experienced both AEs and ADRs (grade ≥ 3, 67.7% and 60.0%, respectively). In the dose range tested (8 to 32 mg/day), TAS-117 pharmacokinetics were dose proportional, and pharmacodynamic analysis showed a reduction of phosphorylated PRAS40, a direct substrate of AKT. Four patients in the SAP had confirmed partial response., Conclusion: Oral doses of TAS-117 once daily up to 16 mg/day and intermittent dosing of 24 mg/day were well tolerated. TAS-117 pharmacokinetics were dose proportional at the doses evaluated. Antitumor activity may occur through AKT inhibition., Trial Registration: jRCT2080222728 (January 29, 2015)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Fertility preserving therapy using medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is an important option for young patients with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH). However, the effectiveness and feasibility of repeated MPA therapy for patients with intrauterine recurrence following initial MPA therapy is controversial. Only a few single-institution retrospective studies have been conducted on repeated MPA therapy, therefore, multicenter prospective studies for repeated MPA therapy are highly needed. The aim of this study is to assess whether repeated MPA therapy is effective and feasible for patients with intrauterine recurrence following initial MPA therapy., Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm, a multicenter phase II trial on repeated MPA therapy for intrauterine recurrence following fertility-preserving therapy for AEH or stage IA (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] 2008) non-myoinvasive endometrioid carcinoma grade 1. Patients are treated with oral MPA (500-600 mg/day). Pathologically assessment via dilation and curettage will be performed every 2 months until complete response. The major inclusion criteria are 1) intrauterine recurrence of AEH or stage IA (FIGO 2008) endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 without myometrial invasion or extrauterine spread confirmed by imaging tests after complete remission with the previous MPA therapy. 2) The number of recurrences should be up to twice. 3) histologically diagnosed as AEH or endometrioid carcinoma grade 1, 4) 20-42 years of age, and 5) strong desire and consent for fertility-sparing treatment. The primary endpoint is 2-year recurrence-free survival rate. A total of 115 patients will be enrolled from multiple institutions in Japan and Korea within 4 years and followed up for 2 years., Trial Registration: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCTs031200256., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objective: We investigated whether pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers are associated with survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer (EC)., Methods: Data from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group 2043 were analyzed. Patients who did not receive chemotherapy or were lost to follow-up were excluded. Associations of pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet (HALP) score, with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The optimal NLR, PLR, and HALP score cutoff values for PFS and OS were determined. Survival estimates were calculated and compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test., Results: We included 712 patients (median age: 55 [range, 28-74] years; body mass index [BMI]: 21.1 [15.2-38.6] kg/m 2 ). For PFS, optimal NLR, PLR, and HALP score cutoff values were 1.48, 0.017, and 35.52, respectively, and for OS, the values were 1.88, 0.026, and 19.87, respectively. At optimal PFS-related cutoff values, NLR was associated with BMI; PLR with age, BMI, and clinical stage; and HALP score with BMI, clinical stage, and lymph node metastasis. At optimal OS-related cutoff values, NLR was associated with BMI, PLR, and BMI; the HALP score was associated with age and BMI. The HALP score was a prognostic factor for PFS (p = 0.025), while PLR and HALP scores were prognostic factors for OS (both p = 0.028)., Conclusions: Pretreatment systemic inflammatory markers are associated with survival outcomes in patients with EC, with the HALP score being a prognostic factor for PFS and OS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer are revised from the 2017 guideline. This guideline aimed to provide standard care for cervical cancer, indicate appropriate current treatment methods for cervical cancer, minimize variances in treatment methods among institutions, improve disease prognosis and treatment safety, reduce the economic and psychosomatic burden of patients by promoting the performance of appropriate treatment, and enhance mutual understanding between patients and healthcare professionals. The guidelines were prepared through the consensus of the JSGO Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of evidence gathered through the literature searches and the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice situations in Japan. The guidelines comprise seven chapters and 5 algorithms. The main features of the 2022 revision are as follows: 1) added discussed points at the final consensus meeting; 2) revised the treatment methods based on the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 staging system; 3) examined minimally invasive surgery based on Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer trial; 4) added clinical question (CQ) for treatments of rare histological types, gastric type, and small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; 5) added CQ for intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 6) added CQ for cancer genomic profiling test; and 7) added CQ for cancer survivorship. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here, we present the English version of the JSGO Guidelines 2022 for the Treatment of Uterine Cervical Cancer., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

To explore the incidence of abnormal vaginal cytology after total laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3, we retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients treated at NHO Shikoku Cancer Center (Japan) in 2014-2019. The cases of 99 patients who underwent a laparoscopic (n=36) or open (n=63) hysterectomy and postoperative follow-up were examined. Abnormal vaginal cytology was detected in 13.9% (5/36) of the laparoscopic-surgery (LS) group and 14.3% (9/63) of the open-surgery (OS) group. A vaginal biopsy was performed at the physicians' discretion; one LS patient and six OS patients were diagnosed with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia. The cumulative incidence of abnormal vaginal cytology at 3 years post-hysterectomy was 21.4% (LS group) and 20.5% (OS group), a nonsignificant difference. A multivariate analysis showed that age > 50 years was the only independent risk factor for abnormal vaginal cytology among the covariates examined including age; body mass index; histories of vaginal delivery, abdominal surgery, and smoking; and surgical approach (hazard ratio 8.11; 95% confidence interval 1.73-37.98; p=0.01). These results suggest that the occurrence of abnormal vaginal cytology after a hysterectomy may not be influenced by the laparoscopic procedure but is associated with older age., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

The first prophylactic vaccine against human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV18 was licensed in Japan in 2009. HPV vaccine effectiveness against high-grade cervical lesions has been demonstrated among young Japanese women, but evidence of its effects on invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is lacking. Using data from two different cancer registries, we compared recent trends of new ICC cases by age group using Poisson regression analysis. We also analyzed time trends in HPV16/18 prevalence among 1414 Japanese women aged <40 years newly diagnosed with ICC in the past decade. Based on the population-based cancer registry, the incidence of ICC among young women aged 20-29 years showed a significant decline from 3.6 to 2.8 per 100 000 women-years during 2016-2019, but no similar decline was observed for older age groups (p < 0.01). Similarly, using data from the gynecological cancer registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the annual number of ICCs among women aged 20-29 years also decreased from 256 cases to 135 cases during 2011-2020 (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, a declining trend in HPV16/18 prevalence in ICC was observed only among women aged 20-29 years during 2017-2022 (90.5%-64.7%, p = 0.05; Cochran-Armitage trend test). This is the first report to suggest population-level effects of HPV vaccination on ICC in Japan. Although the declining trend in HPV16/18 prevalence among young women with ICC supports a causal linkage between vaccination and results from cancer registries, further studies are warranted to confirm that our findings are attributable to vaccination., (© 2023 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.)

Platinum-based combination chemotherapy has been a frontline therapeutic strategy for advanced ovarian cancer. Although patients with ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) respond well to the combination therapy, those with relatively rare histologic subtypes, such as mucinous or clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (OCCC), show resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. Even with the recently developed maintenance therapies using molecular targeted inhibitors for ovarian cancers, such as bevacizumab or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, the prognosis of non-HGSC ovarian cancers is unsatisfactory. To overcome the limitations in the treatment of rare ovarian cancers, the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) has launched a comprehensive project utilizing publicly available genomic databases, including a national clinico-genomic database maintained by the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT). JGOG, a leading group in Japan that conducts clinical trials for the treatment of gynecological malignancies, also established a nationwide network through the long-standing efforts of all participants. Currently, JGOG is engaged in a phase II international clinical trial (CYH33-G201: jRCT2031210216), targeting OCCC with PIK3CA hotspot mutations. The CYH33-G201 trial is sponsor-initiated, and JGOG, in collaboration with pharmaceutical companies, is actively recruiting participants. To expand the functions of the nationwide network that JGOG had already established, we held explanatory meetings for this clinical trial in nine different areas throughout Japan to promote the penetration of the CYH33-G201 trial. Through C-CAT database analysis, we estimated that approximately 40% of the patients with OCCC harbored at least 1 of the 17 PIK3CA hotspot mutations designated in the CYH33-G201 trial. JGOG will continue the challenge of establishing novel treatment strategies for rare refractory cancers that will benefit patients suffering from gynecological malignancies, especially those who do not receive satisfactory standard treatment and care., Competing Interests: K.O. received research funds from Konica Minolta, Inc., and lecture fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; D.A. received honoraria from AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., MSD K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Genmab K.K., and Myriad Genetics, Inc.; A.O. received research funds from Meiji Holdings Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., Linical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Gyne Mom Co., Ltd., Terumo Corporation, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Tsumura Co., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd., and Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd.; A.O. received honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., MSD K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bayer Holding Ltd., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Eisai Co., Ltd.; A.O. received support for attending meeting from AstraZeneca K.K., Johnson & Johnson K.K., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., (Copyright © Japan Medical Association.)

Gestational choriocarcinoma accounts for 5% of gestational trophoblastic neoplasms. Approximately 50%, 25%, and 25% of gestational choriocarcinoma occur after molar pregnancies, term pregnancies, and other gestational events, respectively. The FIGO scoring system categorizes patients into low (score 0 to 6) and high risk (score 7 or more) choriocarcinoma. Single-agent and multi-agent chemotherapy are used in low- and high-risk patients, respectively. Chemotherapy for localized disease has a goal of eradication of disease without surgery and is associated with favorable prognosis and fertility preservation. Most patients with gestational choriocarcinoma are cured with chemotherapy; however, some (<5.0%) will die as a result of multi-drug resistance, underscoring the need for novel approaches in this group of patients. Although there are limited data due to its rarity, the treatment response with immunotherapy is high, ranging between 50-70%. Novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with targeted therapies (including VEGFR-2 inhibitors) are under evaluation. PD-L1 inhibitors are considered a potential important opportunity for chemo-resistant patients, and to replace or de-escalate chemotherapy to avoid or minimize chemotherapy toxicity. In this review, the Rare Tumor Working Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer evaluated the current landscape and further perspective in the management of patients diagnosed with gestational choriocarcinoma., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Competing interests not related to the topic of this investigation: GB: Novartis AG Pharma (C/A, H), Italian Ministry of Health (RG); NC: AstraZeneca (C/A, SH), Seattle Genetics (C/A, SH), MSD (SAB), Mersana (C/A, SH), eTheRNA immunotherapies NV (C/A, SH), Roche (travel expenses), Genmab (travel expenses), Amgen (travel expenses). IR-C: honoraria from AstraZeneca, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro, and PharmaMar; consulting/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro, Genmab, PharmaMar, MSD, Mersana, Deciphera, OncXea, Esai, BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer; research funding from MSD; travel expenses from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Roche. YS: AstraZeneca (CA), GSK (CA). PW: Amgen (SH, RF, SAB), AstraZeneca (SH, RF, H, SAB), Clovis (SH, RF, SAB), Eisai (SH, SAB), GSK (SH, SAB), Lilly (SH, SAB), MSD (SH, RF, SAB), Novartis (SH, RF, SAB), Pfizer (SH, RF, SAB), Roche (SH, RF, H, SAB), TEVA (SH, SAB). NYLN: AstraZeneca (SH), Janssen (SH). KT: AstraZeneca (SH), Chugai (SH, RF), Eisai (SH), MSD (SH), Mochida (SH), Takeda (SH). RLC: Leadership: Onxeo; Stock and Other Ownership Interests: McKesson; Consulting or Advisory Role: Clovis Oncology, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Genmab, Tesaro, OncoMed, Sotio, Oncolytics, AbbVie/Stemcentrx, ImmunoGen, AbbVie, Agenus, Novocure, Merck, OncXerna Therapeutics, Alkermes, Gradalis, Regeneron; Research Funding: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Esperance Pharmaceuticals, Array BioPharma, Clovis Oncology, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Abbott/AbbVie, ImmunoGen (Inst), Mirati Therapeutics (Inst), Amgen (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Lilly (Inst), Regeneron (Inst); Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Array BioPharma, Clovis Oncology, Roche/Genentech, Research to Practice, GOG Foundation, Sotio, Vaniam GroupTE: Takeda (SH), Astra Zeneca (SH), Eisai (SH), Chugai Pharma (SH, RF), MSD (SH), Mochida (SH). DL: AstraZeneca (H, CA), Clovis (H, CA, RF), GSK/Tesaro (H, CA), Roche (CA), Genmab (CA), PharmaMar (CA, RF), MSD (CA, RF), Esai (CA), Merck Serono (CA), Novartis (CA), and PharmaMar (H); consulting/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro. NC, advisory board membership for AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, Immunogen, Mersana, MSD/Merck, Nuvation Bio, Onxerna, Pfizer, Pieris, Roche; fees as an invited speaker for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Clovis Oncology, GSK, MSD/Merck; institutional research grants from AstraZeneca, and Roche. BJM: AstraZeneca (SH, SAB), GSK (SH, SAB), Incyte (SAB), Merck (SH, SAB), Roche/Genentech (SH, SAB), Eisai (SAB), GOG-Foundation (E), US Oncology (E)., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS and HGESS) and undifferentiated uterine sarcomas (UUS) are rare tumors whose pathological classification and staging system have changed recently. These tumors are reported to contain fusion genes. We aimed to clarify the genetic background, clinical features, prognostic factors, and optimal therapy of these tumors using a new classification and staging system., Methods: We analyzed the clinical features and prognostic information of 72 patients with LGESS, 25 with HGESS, and 16 with UUS using central pathological review. Estrogen and progesterone receptors (PgRs) were examined by immunohistochemistry. JAZF1-SUZ12 and YWHAE-NUTM2A/B gene fusions were tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction., Results: The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of LGESS, HGESS, and UUS were 94%, 53%, and 25%, respectively. In LGESS, stage IV, incomplete surgery, and absence of PgR were associated with poor OS. The presence of JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion gene was not associated with OS. In HGESS, the relationship between stage and prognosis was unclear. None of the 3 patients with YWHAE-NUTM2A/B fusion gene died during follow-up. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favorable OS. Incomplete resection of UUS was associated with poor OS; however, residual tumors frequently occurred. Although most patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, their prognosis was extremely poor even in stage I disease., Conclusions: Prognosis of LGESS is generally good; however, stage IV, incomplete surgery, and PgR-negative tumors are associated with poor prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be useful for HGESS. Prognosis of UUS is extremely poor, even with adjuvant chemotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest K.T. has received speakers' bureaus from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Eisai Co., Ltd. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) with a topoisomerase I inhibitor payload, in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) expressing HER2., Patients and Methods: Patients with recurrent UCS with HER2 immunohistochemistry scores ≥1+ previously treated with chemotherapy were included. Patients were assigned to the HER2-high (immunohistochemistry score ≥2+; n = 22) or low (immunohistochemistry score of 1+; n = 10) groups for primary and exploratory analyses, respectively. Trastuzumab deruxtecan 6.4 or 5.4 mg/kg was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Dose modification was based on the updated recommended phase II dose for breast cancer to be 5.4 mg/kg. The primary end point was the objective response rate by central review in the HER2-high group. Secondary end points included the overall response rate (ORR) in the HER2-high group by investigator assessment, ORR in the HER2-low group, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: The ORR by central review in the HER2-high and HER2-low groups were 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2 to 75.6) and 70.0% (95% CI, 34.8 to 93.3) and those by investigator assessments were 68.2% and 60.0%, respectively. The median PFS and OS in the HER2-high and HER2-low groups were 6.2 and 13.3 months and 6.7 months and not reached, respectively. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 20 patients (61%). Grades 1-2 and 3 pneumonitis/interstitial lung disease occurred in eight (24%) and one (3%) patient, respectively., Conclusion: Trastuzumab deruxtecan has efficacy in patients with UCS, regardless of HER2 status. The safety profile was generally consistent with that previously reported. Toxicities were manageable with appropriate monitoring and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has been shown to be effective at reducing mortality for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer but is not widely used in practice. METHODS: We performed the Intraperitoneal Therapy for Ovarian Cancer with Carboplatin (iPocc) trial as an open-label, international, multi-institutional, randomized phase 2/3 clinical trial in women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent laparotomy or laparoscopy. All patients received intravenous paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 21-day cycle). In addition, patients in the control group received intravenous carboplatin (dose-dense intravenous paclitaxel plus intravenous carboplatin [dd-TCiv]), whereas patients in the experimental group received dose-dense intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal carboplatin (dd-TCip). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, tumor response, treatment completion rate, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Among 655 patients randomized to treatment, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 20.7 (18.1 to 22.8) months for dd-TCiv (n=328) and 23.5 (20.5 to 26.9) months for dd-TCip (n=327; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99; P=0.04). The PFS benefit with dd-TCip was consistent in patients with different baseline characteristics, stage, size of residual tumor, age, and performance status. The treatment completion rates were 68.3 and 59.9% in the dd-TCiv and dd-TCip groups, respectively. The incidence of intraperitoneal catheter-related AEs in the dd-TCip group was 10.1%; there were no such AEs in the dd-TCiv group. CONCLUSIONS: In the first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, intraperitoneal carboplatin resulted in a modest prolongation of PFS when given with dose-dense weekly paclitaxel regardless of residual tumor size, with no impact on noncatheter-related toxicities. (Funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and others; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials number, jRCTs031180141.)

The revised World Health Organization classification of cervical cancer divides adenocarcinomas into human papillomavirus-associated (HPVa) and -independent (HPVi) types; the HPVi type is represented by the gastric type. The treatment outcomes of locally advanced adenocarcinoma (LaAC), based on this classification, are understudied. We investigated the outcomes of patients with HPVa and HPVi LaACs. Data for all consecutive patients with stage IB3 to IIIC1 adenocarcinoma who received treatment at 12 institutions throughout Japan between 2004 and 2009 were retrieved to analyze progression-free and overall survival. Central pathological review classified 103 and 48 patients as having HPVa and HPVi tumors, respectively. Usual- (84%) and gastric- (90%) type adenocarcinomas were the most frequent subtypes. Surgery was the primary treatment strategy for most patients. Progression-free and overall survival of patients with HPVi were worse than those of patients with HPVa ( p = 0.009 and 0.032, respectively). Subgroup analysis by stage showed that progression-free survival was significantly different for stage IIB. The current surgical treatment strategy for LaACs is less effective for HPVi tumors than for HPVa tumors, especially those in stage IIB.

Background: We evaluated the feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by debulking surgery, for clinically diagnosed FIGO stage IVb endometrial cancer (protocol number: JGOG2046)., Methods: The experimental treatment consisted of 3 cycles of paclitaxel (180 mg/m2) plus carboplatin (AUC5) followed by debulking surgery, including total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and 3 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were considered as eligible if they were pathologically diagnosed as primary endometrial cancer, and had both endometrial tumor and distant metastasis confirmed by imaging examinations. The primary endpoint was the incidence of patients who completed debulking surgery after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Results: While 51 patients were enrolled from 23 hospitals, the final study cohort consisted of 49 patients with a mean age of 59.0 years. Although the response ratio of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 65.3% (95% CI 50.4-78.3%), 67.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 52.5-80.1%) underwent debulking surgery after the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 59.2% (95% CI 45.2-71.8%) completed the protocol treatment including 3 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. The median disease-free survival time was 9.1 months (95% CI 6.5-11.9), while the median overall survival time was 23.2 months (95% CI 11.9-27.8). A patient with sigmoid colon cancer and another with cervical cancer were included in this study., Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery was a feasible and acceptable treatment for metastatic endometrial cancer. (225 words)., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma., Competing Interests: Competing interests: GB: Novartis AG Pharma (C/A, H), Italian Ministry of Health (RG); NC: AstraZeneca (C/A, SH), Seattle Genetics (C/A, SH), MSD (SAB), Mersana (C/A, SH), eTheRNA immunotherapies NV (C/A, SH), Roche (travel expenses), Genmab (travel expenses), Amgen (travel expenses). IR-C: honoraria from AstraZeneca, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro, and PharmaMar; consulting/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro, Genmab, PharmaMar, MSD, Mersana, Deciphera, OncXea, Esai, BMS, Novartis, and Pfizer; research funding from MSD; travel expenses from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Roche. YS: AstraZeneca (CA), GSK (CA). PW: Amgen (SH, RF, SAB), AstraZeneca (SH, RF, H, SAB), Clovis (SH, RF, SAB), Eisai (SH, SAB), GSK (SH, SAB), Lilly (SH, SAB), MSD (SH, RF, SAB), Novartis (SH, RF, SAB), Pfizer (SH, RF, SAB), Roche (SH, RF, H, SAB), TEVA (SH, SAB). NYLN: AstraZeneca (SH), Janssen (SH). KT: AstraZeneca (SH), Chugai (SH, RF), Eisai (SH), MSD (SH), Mochida (SH), Takeda (SH). TE: Takeda (SH), Astra Zeneca (SH), Eisai (SH), Chugai Pharma (SH, RF), MSD (SH), Mochida (SH). DL: AstraZeneca (H, CA), Clovis (H, CA, RF), GSK/Tesaro (H, CA), Roche (CA), Genmab (CA), PharmaMar (CA, RF), MSD (CA, RF), Esai (CA), Merck Serono (CA), Novartis (CA), and PharmaMar (H); consulting/advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, Roche, Clovis, GSK/Tesaro. DMP: AstraZeneca (CA, SH, SAB), GSK (CA, SH, SAB). NRA-R: NIH/NCI Cancer Center support grant P30 CA008748 (F). HD: Roche (CA, SH, SAB), Pfizer (CA, SH, SAB), AstraZeneca (SH, SAB), Lily (SAB), GSK (SAB), Novartis (SH), Pharmamar (SH); BJM: AstraZeneca (SH, SAB), GSK (SH, SAB), Incyte (SAB), Merck (SH, SAB), Roche/Genentech (SH, SAB), Eisai (SAB), GOG-Foundation (E), US Oncology (E)., (© IGCS and ESGO 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Patients found to have presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPVs) during comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) require genetic counseling (GC) referrals. We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of patients with PGPVs. Among 159 patients who underwent CGP, we recommended GC for the 16 patients with PGPVs (3 with [FG group] and 13 without [G Group] a family/personal history of hereditary cancer) as well as for the 8 patients with no PGPVs, but a history (F group); 2 (67%), 5 (38%), and 3 (38%) patients received GC in the FG, G, and F groups, respectively. Germline testing results were positive in 1 and 2 patients of the FG and G groups, respectively. Among the patients recommended for GC, 58% did not receive GC due to lack of interest, poor performance status, or death. CGP contributes to the identification of germline variants in patients without a history of hereditary cancer. However, the proportion of patients who undergo GC should be improved., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Purpose: Post-operative paralytic ileus (POI) occurs after surgery because of gastrointestinal dysfunction caused by surgical invasion. We therefore investigated the frequency of POI after laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with colorectal cancer using a strictly defined POI diagnosis and identified associated risk factors., Methods: Patients who underwent initial laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2014 and December 2018 were included. The primary end point was the incidence of POI. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the contributing risk factors for POI., Results: Of the 436 patients, 94 (21.6%) had POI. Compared with the non-POI group, the POI group had significantly higher frequencies of infectious complications (p < 0.001), pneumonia (p < 0.001), intra-abdominal abscess (p = 0.012), anastomotic leakage (p = 0.016), and post-operative bleeding (p = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, the right colon (odds ratio [OR] 2.180, p = 0.005), pre-operative chemotherapy (OR 2.530, p = 0.047), pre-operative antithrombotic drug (OR 2.210, p = 0.032), and post-operative complications of CD grade ≥ 3 (OR 12.90, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for POI., Conclusion: Post-operative management considering the risk of post-operative bowel palsy may be necessary for patients with right colon, pre-operative chemotherapy, pre-operative antithrombotic drug or severe post-operative complications., (© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.)

Background: Although purse-string skin closure (PSC) is an effective method for stoma closure considering wound infection, the period for scarring will be prolonged. The aim of this study was to assess whether negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can reduce the wound-scarring period for PSC after stoma closure., Methods: Patients who underwent stoma closure between January 2015 and August 2020 at our department were retrospectively assessed. Patients in the control group received only PSC, and patients in the NPWT group received both PSC and NPWT using the VAC ® or PICO ® . The primary endpoint of this study was the short-term reduction ratio (RR). The RR is calculated by the length, width, and depth of the wound of the stoma closure site. The secondary endpoints were scarring period and wound-related complications such as surgical site infection, dermatitis, bleeding, enterocutaneous fistula, and ventral hernia., Results: Of the 53 patients included in this study, 21 had their stoma closed by PSC and 32 had their stoma closed by PSC plus NPWT. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics or peri-operative states. The RR in the NPWT group was significantly smaller than that in the PSC group at 7 postoperative days (p=0.04). There was no difference in scarring period between the two groups (p=0.11).The rates of postoperative wound-related complications were similar in the two groups (control group: 4 (19%), NPWT group: 7 (21.9%), p=1.0)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that PSC plus NPWT might be more effective for wound healing after stoma closure than only PSC., Competing Interests: The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest., (© 2022 The Juntendo Medical Society.)

Objective: Gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (GAS) is a novel variant of uterine cervix mucinous carcinoma. GAS is a distinct entity that can be distinguished from typical endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA). In Japan, postoperative adjuvant therapy for cervical cancer includes not only radiation therapy (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) but also chemotherapy in many cases. However, no previous studies have analyzed adjuvant therapy for GAS. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of adjuvant therapy for GAS., Methods: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of a dataset from previous nationwide, retrospective, observational study. The study population comprised women with stage I-II GAS who underwent surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients who did and did not receive adjuvant therapy using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Data were analyzed for a total of 102 enrolled patients, who were classified as low- (17 patients), intermediate- (37 patients), or high risk (48 patients) based on the risk of postoperative cervical cancer recurrence. In the intermediate-risk group, median survival could not be assessed due to a lack of sufficient events, but the no-adjuvant and RT groups tended to exhibit better prognoses. In contrast, within the high-risk group, patients in the RT subgroup exhibited a trend towards better PFS and OS than those in the CCRT and chemotherapy groups., Conclusions: The prognosis of GAS was confirmed to be poor, even in cases of early-stage cancer and following surgical resection. Chemotherapy strategies, including CCRT as postoperative adjuvant therapy, tend to have a poor prognosis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The practices pertaining to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) in Japan have been rapidly changing owing to the clinical development of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, the increasing availability of companion diagnostics, and the broadened insurance coverage of HBOC management from April 2020. A questionnaire of gynecologic oncologists was conducted to understand the current status and to promote the widespread standardization of future HBOC management., Methods: A Google Form questionnaire was administered to the members of the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology. The survey consisted of 25 questions in 4 categories: respondent demographics, HBOC management experience, insurance coverage of HBOC management, and educational opportunities related to HBOC., Results: A total of 666 valid responses were received. Regarding the prevalence of HBOC practice, the majority of physicians responded in the negative and required human resources, information sharing and educational opportunities, and expanded insurance coverage to adopt and improve HBOC practice. Most physicians were not satisfied with the educational opportunities provided so far, and further expansion was desired. They remarked on the psychological burdens of many HBOC managements. Physicians reported these burdens could be alleviated by securing sufficient time to engage in HBOC management, creating easy-to-understand explanatory material for patients, collaboration with specialists in genetic medicine, and educational opportunities., Conclusion: Gynecologic oncologists in Japan are struggling to deal with psychological burdens in HBOC practice. To promote the clinical practice of HBOC management, there is an urgent need to strengthen human resources and improve educational opportunities, and expand insurance coverage for HBOC management., Competing Interests: Dr. Kobayashi reports grants and personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Dr. Hirasawa reports personal fees from ACTmed Co. Ltd. Dr. Takehara reports personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and AstraZeneca K.K. Dr. Aoki reports personal fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K. The other authors have nothing to disclose., (© 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Background: Advanced relapsed ovarian cancer has a poor prognosis, and treatment options are limited., Methods: This phase I trial investigated the dosage, safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in Japanese patients with advanced relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients received trabectedin 0.9 or 1.1 mg/m 2 immediately after PLD 30 mg/m 2 ; both drugs were given by intravenous infusion. Treatment was repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined in an initial dose escalation phase, and this was used in a subsequent safety assessment phase. Safety and tumor response were monitored throughout the trial, and drug concentrations for pharmacokinetic analysis were measured during cycle 1., Results: Eighteen patients were included. The MTD of trabectedin was determined as 1.1 mg/m 2 . Gastrointestinal adverse events were experienced by all patients, but were mostly grade 1 or 2 in intensity. Most patients had grade ≥ 3 elevations in transaminase levels or grade ≥ 3 reductions in neutrophil count, but these events were generally manageable through dose reduction and/or supportive therapies, as appropriate. There were no deaths during the trial. Trabectedin exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner. The overall response rate was 27.8%., Conclusions: Trabectedin, in combination with PLD, may have clinical benefits in Japanese patients with relapsed advanced ovarian cancer. The recommended dosage of trabectedin for further study in this population is 1.1 mg/m 2 once every 21 days., Clinical Trial Registration Number: JapicCTI-163164., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy for treating patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix., Methods: A total of 50 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were enrolled and administered docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m 2 , followed by carboplatin at a dose based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 6. The treatments were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Except for two patients, 48 were eligible for evaluation. Another patient withdrew consent before treatment; adverse events were evaluated in 47., Results: The response rate was 47.9% with 5 patients achieving complete response, 18 partial response, 14 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease. The disease control rate was 77.1%. With a median follow-up duration of 368 days, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months (95% CI 5.5-8.6) and 15.8 months (95% CI 18.2-28.3), respectively. The most frequent grade 3 and grade 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia, with 38 patients (81%) having grade 4 and 4 (9%) having grade 3 neutropenia. The non-hematological toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2 in severity., Conclusion: Docetaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy was effective, with a higher disease control rate and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Serous endometrial cancer represents a relative rare entity accounting for about 10% of all diagnosed endometrial cancer, but it is responsible for 40% of endometrial cancer-related deaths. Patients with serous endometrial cancer are often diagnosed at earlier disease stage, but remain at higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis when compared stage-for-stage with endometrioid subtype endometrial cancer. Serous endometrial cancers are characterized by marked nuclear atypia and abnormal p53 staining in immunohistochemistry. The mainstay of treatment for newly diagnosed serous endometrial cancer includes a multi-modal therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Unfortunately, despite these efforts, survival outcomes still remain poor. Recently, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network classified all endometrial cancer types into four categories, of which, serous endometrial cancer mostly is found within the "copy number high" group. This group is characterized by the increased cell cycle deregulation (e.g., CCNE1, MYC, PPP2R1A, PIKCA, ERBB2 and CDKN2A) and TP53 mutations (90%). To date, the combination of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib is an effective treatment modality in second-line therapy, with a response rate of 50% in advanced/recurrent serous endometrial cancer. Owing to the unfavorable outcomes of serous endometrial cancer, clinical trials are a priority. At present, ongoing studies are testing novel combinations of various targeted and immunotherapeutic agents in newly diagnosed and advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer - an important strategy for serous endometrial cancer, whereby tumors are usually p53+ and pMMR, making response to PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy unlikely. Here, the rare tumor working group (including members from the European Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ESGO), Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG), and Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG)), performed a narrative review reporting on the current landscape of serous endometrial cancer and focusing on standard and emerging therapeutic options for patients affected by this difficult disease., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To determine the safety and efficacy of dose-dense (dd) paclitaxel (PTX) and carboplatin (CBDCA) in treating advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer., Methods: Women aged 20-75 years with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III disease with some residual tumor, FIGO stage IV disease, recurrence after front-line curative treatment, or recurrence after second-line chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. PTX (80 mg/m²) was administered intravenously (IV) to every participant on days 1, 8, and 15, and CBDCA (area under the curve of 5) was administered IV on day 1 once every 3 weeks until the disease progressed, unacceptable adverse events occurred, or consent was withdrawn. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects., Results: Forty-eight participants were enrolled, and 46 were eligible to receive treatment. The patients' median age was 61 years (range, 43-76 years). Twenty-two participants had experienced recurrence, and the remaining patients had primary advanced endometrial cancer. There were 10 cases of serous carcinoma, 3 cases of endometrioid carcinoma G3, 2 cases of carcinosarcoma, and 2 cases of clear-cell carcinoma according to histology. Twenty-nine participants (63.0%) received ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy. The RR (complete, 13 cases; partial, 20 cases) was 71.3% (95% confidence interval: 59.0%-84.5%)., Conclusion: The dd PTX with CBDCA is feasible and available as a treatment option for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer., Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: UMIN000017138., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (Copyright © 2021. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is an uncommon and highly aggressive tumor. There is no HER2 testing protocol for UCS despite the development of HER2 antibody conjugates. We aimed to elucidate histopathological HER2 expression details in UCS, to compare HER2 scores between ASCO/CAP criteria for gastric and breast cancer, and to propose requirements for HER2 testing for UCS. Eighty-nine specimens from 84 patients with metastatic/recurrent UCS were prospectively collected from May 2018 to July 2020. We performed HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) for 89 specimens and FISH for 44 specimens. HER2 expression details and HER2 score were evaluated according to the latest ASCO/CAP criteria for gastric (2016) and breast cancer (2018). HER2 IHC scores according to the gastric cancer criteria were 0 in 31 cases (35%), 1+ in 26 (29%), 2+ in 22 (25%), and 3+ in 10 cases (11%) of the 89 specimens. A lateral/basolateral membranous staining pattern was observed in 28/32 (88%) specimens with HER2 scores of 2+/3+. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity was identified in 28/32 (88%) of the specimens with HER2 scores of 2+/3+. The overall concordance rate of HER2 score was 70% between the gastric and breast criteria. FISH revealed HER2 gene amplification in 10/44 (23%) specimens containing only lateral/basolateral membranous staining pattern. Based on the histopathological features of HER2 expression in UCS, a scoring system that accepts lateral/basolateral staining patterns should be applied. Furthermore, we proposed specific requirements for UCS testing, including specimen selection, scoring system, and calculating the proportion of HER2-positive cells.

Background: We proposed a novel treatment strategy, consisting of triweekly cisplatin plus dose-dense weekly paclitaxel before and after radical hysterectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy to treat locally advanced cervical cancer. However, cisplatin-related severe non-hematologic toxicities were frequent during this strategy. This study aimed to assess the applicability of replacing cisplatin with carboplatin in our proposed strategy., Methods: Women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2008 stage IB2, IIA2, or IIB cervical cancer received three cycles of carboplatin (based on an area under the curve of six), each 21 days apart, starting on day 1, and 80 mg/m 2 of paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle before undergoing radical hysterectomy. Patients with one or more high-risk factors, including lymph vascular invasion, parametrial invasion, lymph-node metastasis, or positive margins, received three additional cycles of chemotherapy after hysterectomy. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy was only applied to those patients who failed to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Results: Between September 2014 and July 2016, 50 women (13 women with FIGO stage IB2, 5 with stage IIA2, and 32 with stage IIB) were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate to chemotherapy was 92%, including 22% with pathological complete response. Forty-nine women (98%) completed the planned radical hysterectomy, and 11 (22%) women with one or more high-risk factors received three additional cycles of chemotherapy. Only four women (8%) received concurrent chemoradiation therapy after surgery. The 2- and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 88.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 98.0% and 95.4%, respectively. Only two patients reported grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicities including grade 3 nausea in one patient and grade 3 liver dysfunction in one patient., Conclusions: Replacement the platinum agent resulted in equivalent efficacy, with reduced toxicity, in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. This strategy could considerably diminish the application of radiation therapy without reduced survival. A study to identify those patients who will benefit from this new multidisciplinary strategy is warranted.

Objective: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) is a rare gynecologic malignancy for which the currently available treatments do not consistently provide long-term disease control. This study aimed to reveal the current clinical status of uLMS to support future clinical trials., Methods: This study enrolled patients with uLMS treated at 53 Japanese institutions from 2000 to 2012. Central pathological review (CPR) was performed. All cases were confirmed by CPR, and epidemiological features, treatment, and prognosis were analyzed statistically., Results: A total of 307 patients were enrolled. A diagnosis of uLMS was confirmed in 266 patients (86.6%) of patients after CPR, of whom data for 259 were analyzed. Of these, 186 (71.8%) patients underwent complete gross resection as primary therapy. Ninety-eight patients received no additional adjuvant therapy, while docetaxel and gemcitabine was the most frequent regimen among 155 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. In all cases, the median overall survival (OS) was 44.2 months. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in all cases identified stage III and IV disease, high serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and menopausal status as poor prognostic factors. However, in stage I cases, high serum lactate dehydrogenase level and no adjuvant treatment were identified as poor prognostic factors. The 5-year OS of patients with stage I uLMS treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly better than that of those without adjuvant treatment (67.8% vs 46.7%, P = 0.0461)., Conclusions: Despite complete removal of the primary lesion, the clinical course of patients with uLMS was poor due to recurrence of distant metastasis. The application of a suitable biomarker and effective adjuvant chemotherapy are required to improve the prognosis of patients with uLMS., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study was to analyze patterns and risk factors of relapse after postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer., Methods: Among patients enrolled in a randomized phase III trial (JGOG2043) investigating the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer at a high risk of progression, the recurrent patients were studied. Clinical information were collected, and correlation between relapse-related factors and clinicopathological factors were analyzed., Results: Among 193 patients analyzed, 50% had local relapse and 63% had distant relapse. Local relapse involved regional lymph nodes in 30%, while distant relapse involved the abdominal cavity in 42%. Imaging was used to confirm relapse in 83%, and the median disease-free interval (DFI) was 11.5 months. Factors showing a significant correlation with DFI ≤12 months were residual tumor at surgery (p < 0.01), Grade 3 histology (p < 0.01), and lymph node metastasis (p = 0.03). In contrast, treatment with paclitaxel and carboplatin showed a significant correlation with DFI >12 months (p = 0.04). The median post-relapse overall survival (RS) was 23.9 months. In multivariate analysis, CA125 ≥ 100 U/mL prior to relapse (p < 0.01), distant metastasis (p < 0.01), DFI ≤ 12 months (p = 0.02), and not performing para-aortic lymphadenectomy (p = 0.01) were independently related to poor RS., Conclusions: Relapse of endometrial cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy often occurs by 1 year after treatment, with common relapse sites of the abdominal cavity and regional lymph nodes. Among treatment-related factors, RS was correlated with DFI and para-aortic lymphadenectomy., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Recently, we established new histopathological subtypes of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) that include the mesenchymal transition (MT) type, the immune reactive (IR) type, the solid and proliferative (SP) type and the papillo-glandular (PG) type. Furthermore, we identified that the mesenchymal transcriptome subtype might be sensitive to taxane. We investigated whether these different histopathological subtypes of HGSOC require individualized chemotherapy for optimal treatment., Methods: We conducted the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG) 3016A1 study, wherein we collected hematoxylin and eosin slides (total n = 201) and performed a histopathological analysis of patients with HGSOC registered in the JGOG3016 study, which compared the efficacy of conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) and dose-dense TC (ddTC). We analyzed the differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the four histopathological subtypes. We then compared the PFS between the TC group and the ddTC group for each histopathological subtype., Results: There were significant differences in both PFS and OS among the four histopathological subtypes (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Overall, the MT subtype had the shortest PFS (median 1.4 y) and OS (median 3.6 y). In addition, the MT subtype had a longer PFS in the ddTC group (median 1.8 y) than in the TC group (median 1.2 y) (p = 0.01). Conversely, the other types had no significant difference in PFS when the two regimens were compared., Conclusions: The MT type of HGSOC is sensitive to taxane; therefore, the ddTC regimen is recommended for this histopathological subtype., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (GAS) is a novel variant of mucinous carcinoma of the uterine cervix. As shown in the original Japanese group description, in recent studies, GAS represents a more aggressive disease than the usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA). Detailed clinicopathological features of this variant remain to be elucidated in a larger series of patients., Methods: Patients were enrolled by the Gynecologic Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group after receiving the approval of each Institutional Review Board. The study population comprised of women with stage I to II endocervical adenocarcinomas who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2009. Representative slides were evaluated by central pathological review (CPR), categorized into either GAS or UEA, and correlated with clinicopathological features and outcome., Results: Among the 393 enrolled patients with endocervical adenocarcinoma, 328 patients met the criteria for CPR and the study eligibility criteria and were included in further analysis. A total of 95 of the 328 tumors were classified as GAS. Compared with UEA, GAS was more significantly associated with bulky mass, deep stromal invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, parametrial invasion, ovarian metastasis, positive ascitic fluid cytology, pelvic lymph node metastasis, and pathological (p) T stage but was not related to the degree of histological differentiation. Disease-free survival (P < 0.0001) and overall survival (P < 0.0001) were poorer in patients with GAS than in those with UEA., Conclusions: GAS showed aggressive behavior with ominous histopathological predictors as well as decreased survival. GAS is therefore considered a distinct entity that should be distinguished from UEA., Clinical Trial Information: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000007987., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Taxane/platinum (TP)-based combination chemotherapy is standard for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of postoperative TP therapy in early stage cervical cancer., Methods: A retrospective review of patients with FIGO IB-IIB stage cervical cancer who were treated with radical hysterectomy and displayed surgical-pathological risk factors was performed. 122 patients were identified between 2003 and 2012. Survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to investigate predictors of survival., Results: The median follow-up period was 82.4 months. The postoperative adjuvant therapy was TP in 82 (67.2%) patients, other chemotherapies in 10 (8.2%), radiotherapy (RT) in 25 (20.5%), and no further therapy (NFT) in 5 (4.1%). Survival was analyzed using 4 subgroups according to the postoperative adjuvant therapy. The estimated 5-year overall survival was 95.1% in the TP group, 90.0% in the other chemotherapy group, 78.9% in the RT group, and 100% in the NFT group. No significant difference of survival was observed in the subgroups. However, when analyzing only patients who displayed high-risk factors, non-TP adjuvant therapy (including RT and other chemotherapies) was independently associated with shorter survival on multivariate analysis. In the TP group, multivariate analysis revealed that a positive surgical margin was a significant predictor of shorter survival., Conclusions: Postoperative TP is effective in patients with surgically treated early stage cervical cancer. In these populations, a positive surgical margin could be associated with poor prognosis.

Objective: This multicenter phase II Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group study (JGOG1067) was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with node-positive cervical cancer., Methods: Patients with stage IB-IIA squamous cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and were confirmed to have pelvic lymph node metastasis were eligible for this study. The patients postoperatively received irinotecan (CPT-11; 60mg/m 2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and nedaplatin (NDP; 80mg/m 2 intravenously on day 1). Chemotherapy administration commenced within 6weeks after surgery and was repeated every 28days for up to 5cycles. The primary endpoint of this study was the 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. The secondary endpoints were the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, 5-year RFS rate, and adverse events such as complications of chemotherapy and lower-limb edema., Results: Sixty-two patients were analyzed according to our protocol, among whom 55 (88.7%) completed 5cycles of scheduled treatment. The median follow-up period was 66.1months (range, 16.8-96.6months). The 2-year and 5-year RFS rates were 87.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.9-99.3) and 77.2% (95% CI: 64.5-85.8), respectively. Fourteen patients (22.5%) experienced recurrence during the follow-up period, 8 of whom died of the disease. The 5-year OS rate in this study was 86.5% (95% CI: 74.8-93.0). Only 9.7% of the patients experienced lymphedema in their legs., Conclusion: Postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy was found to be very effective in high-risk patients with node-positive cervical cancer., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited disease caused by germline mutations in mismatch repair genes. Analysis for microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of protein expressions of disease-associated genes is used to screen for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer patients. When losses of both MLH1 and PMS2 proteins are observed by IHC, MLH1 promoter methylation analysis is conducted to distinguish Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer from sporadic cancer., Case Presentation: Here we report a woman who developed endometrial cancer at the age of 49 years. She had a family history of colorectal cancer (first-degree relative aged 52 years) and stomach cancer (second-degree relative with the age of onset unknown). No other family history was present, and she failed to meet the Amsterdam II criteria for the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome. Losses of MLH1 and PMS2, but not MSH2 and MSH6, proteins were observed by IHC in endometrial cancer tissues. Because MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was detected in endometrial cancer tissue samples, the epigenetic silencing of MLH1 was suspected as the cause of the protein loss. However, because of the early onset of endometrial cancer and the positive family history, a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome was also suspected. Therefore, we provided her with genetic counseling. After obtaining her consent, MLH1 promoter methylation testing and genetic testing of peripheral blood were performed. MLH1 promoter methylation was not observed in peripheral blood. However, genetic testing revealed a large deletion of exon 5 in MLH1; thus, we diagnosed the presence of Lynch syndrome., Conclusions: Both MLH1 germline mutation and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation may be observed in endometrial cancer. Therefore, even if MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is detected, a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome cannot be excluded.

Objective Perifosine exhibits anti-tumor activity by inhibiting AKT phosphorylation. The purpose of this phase II basket trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perifosine monotherapy for ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. Methods Recurrent or persistent ovarian, endometrial, or cervical cancer patients were assigned to PIK3CA wild-type or mutant groups. Each patient received 600 mg oral perifosine on day 1 followed by a maintenance dose of 100 mg daily. The primary endpoint was disease control rate; secondary endpoints included response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Immunohistochemical staining and targeted sequencing were used to explore new biomarkers in such patients. Results Sixteen and 5 ovarian, 17 and 7 endometrial, and 18 and 8 cervical cancer patients with PIK3CA wild-type and mutant, respectively, were enrolled. Disease control rates (wild-type/mutant) were 12.5/40.0%, 47.1/14.3%, and 11.1/25.0% in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were anemia (22.5%) and anorexia (11.3%). Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the disease control rate in patients with negative phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) expression was 50.0%, and the odds ratio of positive to negative patients was 0.24 in all patients. Conclusions Perifosine monotherapy showed good tolerability but expected efficacy was not achieved. Modest efficacy was demonstrated in ovarian cancer patients with PIK3CA mutations and endometrial cancer patients with PIK3CA wild-type; no difference was observed between PIK3CA wild-type and mutant in cervical cancer. Absence of PTEN expression may be predictive of clinical efficacy with perifosine monotherapy.

To investigate the safety and efficacy of cisplatin(CDDP)treatment after carboplatin(CBDCA)hypersensitivity reactions (CHSR)in gynecologic malignancies, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 544 patients who underwent paclitaxel and CBDCA therapy(TC therapy). CHSR was observed in 18 patients. Eight patients were administered weekly paclitaxel and CDDP therapy(wTP therapy)continuously, to confirm that there was no CDDP hypersensitivity followingintravenous administration of 10 mgCDDP. At the onset of CHSR, the patients had received a median of 9 TC therapy cycles, and the median number of CBDCA administrations was 14. The frequency of CHSR was significantly higher in patients who received 7 cycles or more of TC therapy and CBDCA administration(p<0.0001). The median number of wTP therapy administrations was 8. Although CDDP hypersensitivity reactions were observed in 2 patients, their symptoms were mild(Grade 2, CTCAE v4.0). Of the 6 patients who received wTP therapy and had evaluable disease sites, 1, 2, 2 and 1 patients showed CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively. The median progression-free survival in these 6 patients was 9.5 months. For patients with the platinum- sensitive disease who have CHSR, CDDP could improve their prognosis.