151. Dissociation of the lactose repressor protein tetramer using high hydrostatic pressure.
- Author
-
Royer CA, Weber G, Daly TJ, and Matthews KS
- Subjects
- Escherichia coli metabolism, Hydrostatic Pressure, Macromolecular Substances, Protein Conformation, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Repressor Proteins metabolism, Transcription Factors metabolism
- Abstract
Dissociation of lac repressor tetramer by high hydrostatic pressures was monitored with intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. With the assumption of complete dissociation to monomer, tryptophan polarization data gave delta V a approximately 170 mL/mol and the concentration for 50% tetramer dissociation, C1/2, was 3.8 X 10(-8) M. Upon addition of inducer, the calculated delta V a increased to approximately 220 mL/mol and the C1/2 decreased to approximately 1 X 10(-8) M, a free energy difference of approximately 0.7 kcal. These results indicate a modest stabilization of the tetramer by the presence of inducer. Monitoring the average energy of tryptophan emission demonstrated that tetramer dissociation takes place over the same range of pressures as evidenced by the polarization data and IPTG dissociation can be more or less superimposed upon tetramer dissociation depending upon the ligand concentration used. Although the two transitions cannot be separated entirely, the delta V a for the region of the pressure dependence dominated by ligand dissociation was 69 mL/mol, an unexpectedly large value. For tetramer modified with methyl methanethiosulfonate, subunit dissociation was shifted to much higher pressures and IPTG dissociation did not occur. The delta V a for subunit association was calculated as approximately 160 mL/mol, and the C1/2 was 3.5 X 10(-9) M. Interactions at the subunit interface of the modified protein are apparently stronger than in the unmodified protein. The absence of inducer dissociation from the MMTS-modified tetramer by the application of high hydrostatic pressure suggests that the volume change for inducer binding to the modified protein is much smaller than that observed for the unmodified repressor.
- Published
- 1986
- Full Text
- View/download PDF