151. Prospective study of the impact of open and closed infusion systems on rates of central venous catheter-associated bacteremia.
- Author
-
Rosenthal VD and Maki DG
- Subjects
- Aged, Argentina epidemiology, Bacteremia etiology, Bacteremia microbiology, Candida isolation & purification, Cohort Studies, Cross Infection etiology, Cross Infection microbiology, Female, Gram-Negative Bacteria isolation & purification, Gram-Positive Bacteria isolation & purification, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous instrumentation, Infusions, Intravenous methods, Intensive Care Units, Male, Prevalence, Prospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Bacteremia epidemiology, Bacteremia prevention & control, Cross Infection epidemiology, Cross Infection prevention & control, Infection Control methods, Infusions, Intravenous adverse effects
- Abstract
Objective: We sought to ascertain the effect of switching from an open infusion system to a closed system on rates and sequelae of central venous catheter (CVC)-associated bloodstream infection in the intensive care department (ICU) of 2 hospitals in Argentina., Methods: A prospective, controlled, time-series, cohort trial was undertaken in adult patients admitted to 4 level-III adult ICUs in Buenos Aires, Argentina, who had a CVC in place for at least 24 hours. Rates of CVC-associated bloodstream infection during a period of active surveillance with an open system (baseline; externally vented, semirigid, noncollapsible, 1-port plastic bottles) were compared with rates after switching to a closed system (intervention; nonvented, collapsible, 2-port plastic bags)., Results: Between August 1999 and March 2002, 992 patients in the ICU with CVCs were enrolled. Patients during each study period (open system, 608; closed system, 384) were similar with respect to sex, severity-of-illness score, and prevalence of diabetes and cancer. Compliance with handwashing and CVC site care was also similar during the 2 study periods. The incidence of CVC-associated bacteremia during use of the closed system was significantly lower than during use of the open system (2.36 vs 6.52/1000 catheter-days, relative risk=0.36, 95% confidence interval=0.14-0.94, P=.02); bacteremias caused by gram-negative bacilli declined by 64%. In all, 17 patients with catheter-associated bacteremia died during the period when the open system was in use (2.8%), versus only 1 (0.2%) during use of the closed system (relative risk 0.09, P=.003). The calculated cost savings in the 20 hospital-month intervention period was $53,768 and 130.9 ICU days., Conclusion: Adoption of a closed infusion system resulted in major reductions in the incidence of catheter-associated bacteremia, related mortality, and cost. Because most Latin American hospitals still use externally vented fluid containers, switching to nonvented bags could substantially reduce rates of nosocomial bacteremia.
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF