151. Does successful small-scale coordination help or hinder coordination at larger scales?
- Author
-
Seth Frey and Robert L. Goldstone
- Subjects
Linguistics and Language ,Computer science ,Communication ,05 social sciences ,Network science ,Scale (descriptive set theory) ,050105 experimental psychology ,Language and Linguistics ,Preference ,Human-Computer Interaction ,Competition (economics) ,Stag hunt ,Complementarity (molecular biology) ,0502 economics and business ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Animal Science and Zoology ,Pairwise comparison ,050207 economics ,Set (psychology) ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
An individual can interact with the same set of people over many different scales simultaneously. Four people might interact as a group of four and, at the same time, in pairs and triads. What is the relationship between different parallel interaction scales, and how might those scales themselves interact? We devised a four-player experimental game, the Modular Stag Hunt, in which participants chose not just whether to coordinate, but with whom, and at what scale. Our results reveal coordination behavior with such a strong preference for dyads that undermining pairwise coordination actually improves group-scale outcomes. We present these findings as experimental evidence for competition, as opposed to complementarity, between different possible scales of multi-player coordination. This result undermines a basic premise of approaches, like those of network science, that fail to model the interacting effects of dyadic, triadic, and group-scale structures on group outcomes.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF