Search

Background: Management guidelines from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases/American College of Gastroenterology/American Gastroenterology Association published in 2012 for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and steatohepatitis (NASH) recommend weight loss, vitamin E and pioglitazone as effective therapies for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed NASH. However, little is known about how physicians in the US diagnose NASH or whether published guidelines are being followed. Methods: We assessed current diagnostic and treatment patterns of the management of NAFLD and NASH among academic gastroenterologists and hepatologists in the US using a standardized survey developed to collect information regarding respondents’ practice environments, diagnostic techniques, and medication usage in patients with NAFLD/NASH. Results: We invited 482 gastroenterologists and hepatologists, predominantly from academic centers, of whom 163 completed the survey. Only 24% of providers routinely perform liver biopsy, predominantly among patients with elevated serum aminotransferases. Vitamin E is prescribed regularly by 70% while only 14% routinely prescribe pioglitazone. Despite recommendations to the contrary, ~25% prescribe pioglitazone or vitamin E without biopsy confirmation of NASH. Metformin is used as frequently as pioglitazone despite its proven lack of efficacy in NASH. Overall, 40–73% adhere to published guidelines, depending on the specific question. There was no significant difference seen in adherence to guidelines between gastroenterologists and hepatologists. Conclusion: This survey suggests that clinical practice patterns among gastroenterologists and hepatologists for the management of NASH frequently diverge from published practice guidelines. Although liver biopsy remains the gold standard to diagnose NASH, less than 25% of respondents routinely require it to make the diagnosis of NASH. We conclude that NASH is underdiagnosed in gastroenterology and hepatology practices, highlighting the need to refine noninvasive diagnostic tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Semaglutide, a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist, has demonstrated potential beneficial effects in metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Aims: To describe the trial design and baseline characteristics of the 'Effect of Semaglutide in Subjects with Non‐cirrhotic Non‐alcoholic Steatohepatitis' (ESSENCE) trial (NCT04822181). Methods: ESSENCE is a two‐part, phase 3, randomised, multicentre trial evaluating the effect of subcutaneous semaglutide 2.4 mg in participants with biopsy‐proven MASH and fibrosis stage 2 or 3. The primary objective of Part 1 is to demonstrate that semaglutide improves liver histology compared with placebo. The two primary endpoints are: resolution of steatohepatitis and no worsening of liver fibrosis, and improvement in liver fibrosis and no worsening of steatohepatitis. The Part 2 objective is based on clinical outcomes. The current work reports baseline characteristics of the first 800 randomised participants which includes demographics, laboratory parameters, liver histology, non‐invasive tests and presence of metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) cardiometabolic criteria. Results: Of 800 participants, 250 (31.3%) had fibrosis stage 2 and 550 (68.8%) had fibrosis stage 3. In the overall population, mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 56 (11.6) years, 57.1% were female, mean (SD) body mass index was 34.6 (7.2) kg/m2, 55.5% had type 2 diabetes and > 99% had at least one MASLD cardiometabolic criterion according to the published definition. Conclusion: The ESSENCE baseline population includes participants with clinically significant fibrosis stages 2 and 3. Although MASLD cardiometabolic criteria were not a requirement for study enrolment, almost all participants (> 99%) had at least one MASLD cardiometabolic criterion. Trial Registration: NCT04822181 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with an increase in healthcare resource use and poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We assessed the humanistic and economic burden of NASH, disease management, and patient journey. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data, collected from July through November 2017, from the Growth from Knowledge Disease Atlas Real-World Evidence program, reported by physicians in United States, France, and Germany. We extracted demographic and medical data from medical records. Some patients voluntarily completed a survey that provided information on disease history, treatment satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes. We analyzed data from 1216 patients (mean age, 54.9±12.3 years; 57.5% male; mean body mass index, 31.7±6.9); 64.6% had biopsy-confirmed NASH and comorbidities were recorded for 41.3%. Treatments included lifestyle modification (64.6%) or use of statins (25.0%), vitamin E (23.5%), or metformin (20.2%). Patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH reported more physician (4.5 vs 3.7) and outpatient visits (1.8 vs1.4) than patients with suspected NASH not confirmed by biopsy. Among the 299 patients who completed the survey, 47.8% reported various symptoms associated to their NASH. Symptomatic patients reported significantly lower HRQoL than patients without symptoms. In an analysis of data from 3 countries, we found NASH to be associated with regular use of medical resources; patients with symptoms of NASH had reduced HRQoL. The burden of NASH appears to be underestimated. Studies are needed to determine the burden of NASH by fibrosis stage and disease severity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early liver transplantation (without requiring a minimum period of sobriety) for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is controversial: many centers delay eligibility until a specific period of sobriety (such as 6 months) has been achieved. To inform ongoing debate and policy, we modeled long-term outcomes of early vs delayed liver transplantation for patients with AH. We developed a mathematical model to simulate early vs delayed liver transplantation for patients with severe AH and different amounts of alcohol use after transplantation: abstinence, slip (alcohol use followed by sobriety), or sustained use. Mortality of patients before transplantation was determined by joint-effect model (based on Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] and Lille scores). We estimated life expectancies of patients receiving early vs delayed transplantation (6-month wait before placement on the waitlist) and life years lost attributable to alcohol use after receiving the liver transplant. Patients offered early liver transplantation were estimated to have an average life expectancy of 6.55 life years, compared with an average life expectancy of 1.46 life years for patients offered delayed liver transplantation (4.49-fold increase). The net increase in life expectancy from offering early transplantation was highest for patients with Lille scores of 0.50–0.82 and MELD scores of 32 or more. Patients who were offered early transplantation and had no alcohol use afterward were predicted to survive 10.85 years compared with 3.62 years for patients with sustained alcohol use after transplantation (7.23 life years lost). Compared with delayed transplantation, early liver transplantation increased survival times in all simulated scenarios and combinations of Lille and MELD scores. In a modeling study of assumed carefully selected patients with AH, early vs delayed liver transplantation (6 months of abstinence from alcohol before transplantation) increased survival times of patients, regardless of estimated risk of sustained alcohol use after transplantation. These findings support early liver transplantation for patients with severe AH. The net increase in life expectancy was maintained in all simulated extreme scenarios but should be confirmed in prospective studies. Sustained alcohol use after transplantation significantly reduced but did not eliminate the benefits of early transplantation. Strategies are needed to prevent and treat posttransplantation use of alcohol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims The American Consortium of Early Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Hepatitis comprises 12 centers from 8 United Network for Organ Sharing regions studying early liver transplantation (LT) (without mandated period of sobriety) for patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH). We analyzed the outcomes of these patients. Methods We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe AH and no prior diagnosis of liver disease or episodes of AH, who underwent LT before 6 months of abstinence from 2006 through 2017 at 12 centers. We collected data on baseline characteristics, psychosocial profiles, level of alcohol consumption before LT, disease course and treatment, and outcomes of LT. The interval of alcohol abstinence was defined as the time between last drink and the date of LT. The primary outcomes were survival and alcohol use after LT, defined as slip or sustained. Results Among 147 patients with AH who received liver transplants, the median duration of abstinence before LT was 55 days; 54% received corticosteroids for AH and the patients had a median Lille score of 0.82 and a median Sodium Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 39. Cumulative patient survival percentages after LT were 94% at 1 year (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%–97%) and 84% at 3 years (95% CI, 75%–90%). Following hospital discharge after LT, 72% were abstinent, 18% had slips, and 11% had sustained alcohol use. The cumulative incidence of any alcohol use was 25% at 1 year (95% CI, 18%–34%) and 34% at 3 years (95% CI, 25%–44%) after LT. The cumulative incidence of sustained alcohol use was 10% at 1 year (95% CI, 6%–18%) and 17% at 3 years (95% CI, 10%–27%) after LT. In multivariable analysis, only younger age was associated with alcohol following LT ( P = .01). Sustained alcohol use after LT was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 4.59; P = .01). Conclusions In a retrospective analysis of 147 patients who underwent early LT (before 6 months of abstinence) for severe AH, we found that most patients survive for 1 year (94%) and 3 years (84%), similar to patients receiving liver transplants for other indications. Sustained alcohol use after LT was infrequent but associated with increased mortality. Our findings support the selective use of LT as a treatment for severe AH. Prospective studies are needed to optimize selection criteria, management of patients after LT, and long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obeticholic acid (OCA) is a first-in-class farnesoid X receptor agonist and antifibrotic agent in development for the treatment of pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We aimed to validate the original 18-month liver biopsy analysis from the phase III REGENERATE trial of OCA for the treatment of NASH with a consensus panel analysis, provide additional histology data in a larger population, and evaluate safety from >8,000 total patient-years' exposure with nearly 1,000 participants receiving study drug for >4 years. Digitized whole-slide images were evaluated independently by panels of three pathologists using the NASH Clinical Research Network scoring system. Primary endpoints were (1) ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH or (2) NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis. Safety was assessed by laboratory values and adverse events. Prespecified efficacy analyses included 931 participants. The proportion of participants achieving a ≥1 stage improvement in fibrosis with no worsening of NASH was 22.4% for OCA 25 mg vs. 9.6% for placebo (p <0.0001). More participants receiving OCA 25 mg vs. placebo achieved NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis (6.5% vs. 3.5%, respectively; p = 0.093). Histology data in a larger population of 1,607 participants supported these results. Safety data included 2,477 participants. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and deaths was not substantively different across treatment groups. Pruritus was the most common TEAE. Rates of adjudicated hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular events were low and similar across treatment groups. These results confirm the antifibrotic effect of OCA 25 mg. OCA was generally well tolerated over long-term dosing. These data support a positive benefit:risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH. Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) often have liver scarring (fibrosis), which causes an increased risk of liver-related illness and death. Preventing progression of fibrosis to cirrhosis or reversing fibrosis are the main goals of drug development for NASH. In this clinical trial of obeticholic acid (OCA) in patients with NASH (REGENERATE), we reaffirmed our previous results demonstrating that OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis using a more rigorous consensus panel analysis of liver biopsies taken at month 18. We also showed that OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum liver biochemistries and liver stiffness measurements compared with placebo, even in participants in whom histologic fibrosis did not change at 18 months, providing evidence that the benefit of OCA extends beyond what is captured by the ordinal NASH CRN scoring system. OCA was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile supporting a positive benefit: risk profile in patients with pre-cirrhotic liver fibrosis due to NASH. [Display omitted] • OCA was superior to placebo in improving fibrosis by ≥1 stage with no worsening of NASH. • OCA treatment resulted in dose-dependent reductions of serum ALT levels. • OCA reduced liver stiffness compared to placebo regardless of histologic response. • OCA was generally well tolerated and demonstrated a favorable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis is rapidly growing as an indication for liver transplant(ation) (LT). However, the natural history of NASH cirrhosis among LT waitlist registrants has not been established. The present study aimed to define the natural history of NASH cirrhosis using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. The study cohort comprised patients registered on the LT waitlist between 1/1/2016 to 12/31/2021. The primary outcomes included probability of LT and waitlist mortality, comparing NASH (n = 8,120) vs. non-NASH (n = 21,409) cirrhosis. Patients with NASH cirrhosis were listed with lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores despite bearing a greater burden of portal hypertension, especially at lower MELD scores. The overall transplant probability in LT waitlist registrants with NASH [ vs. non-NASH] cirrhosis was significantly lower at 90 days (HR 0.873, p < 0.001) and 1 year (HR 0.867, p < 0.001); this was even more pronounced in patients with MELD scores >30 (HR 0.705 at 90 days and HR 0.672 at 1 year, p < 0.001 for both). Serum creatinine was the key contributor to MELD score increases leading to LT among LT waitlist registrants with NASH cirrhosis, while bilirubin was in patients with non-NASH cirrhosis. Finally, waitlist mortality at 90 days (HR 1.15, p < 0.001) and 1 year (1.25, p < 0.001) was significantly higher in patients with NASH cirrhosis compared to those with non-NASH cirrhosis. These differences were more pronounced in patients with lower MELD scores at the time of LT waitlist registration. LT waitlist registrants with NASH cirrhosis are less likely to receive a transplant compared to patients with non-NASH cirrhosis. Serum creatinine was the major contributor to MELD score increases leading to LT in patients with NASH cirrhosis. This study provides important insights into the distinct natural history of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis among liver transplant (LT) waitlist registrants, revealing that patients with NASH cirrhosis face lower odds of transplantation and higher waitlist mortality than those with non-NASH cirrhosis. Our study underscores the significance of serum creatinine as a crucial contributor to model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in patients with NASH cirrhosis. These findings have substantial implications, emphasizing the need for ongoing evaluation and refinement of the MELD score to more accurately capture mortality risk in patients with NASH cirrhosis on the LT waitlist. Moreover, the study highlights the importance of further research investigating the impact of the implementation of MELD 3.0 across the US on the natural history of NASH cirrhosis. [Display omitted] • Patients with NASH cirrhosis were listed with lower MELD scores, despite having a higher burden of portal hypertension. • NASH cirrhosis was associated with a lower probability of transplantation and higher waitlist mortality. • Serum creatinine was the key driver of increases in MELD score leading to transplant in patients with NASH cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) are used to monitor liver transplant recipients (LTR) but the reference range and context of its use is not well defined. We aimed to determine the healthy ranges in LTR without chronic liver disease. One hundred and three LTR without chronic liver disease based on serology, transient elastography with controlled attenuated parameter, and ultrasound were included. A healthy range of aminotransferases was set to 95th percentile. An updated normal aminotransferase range was used to detect recurrence in post-liver transplantation (LT) with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The normal ALT and AST range was 0 to 57 and 0 to 54 IU/L, respectively, in LTR and was not affected by age, sex, obesity, or choice of immunosuppressant. The diagnostic performance of serum ALT and AST to detect recurrence of NAFLD by a controlled attenuated parameter was poor with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.573 (95% confidence interval 0.493, 0.655; P =.08) and 0.537 (0.456, 0.618; P =.4), respectively. In contrast, the diagnostic performance of ALT and AST to detect recurrence of HCV after LT was 0.906 (0.868, 0.944; P <.001) and 0.925 (0.890, 0.959; P <.001), respectively. The updated aminotransferase range in LTR is higher than the general population and accurate for detecting recurrent HCV, but not NAFLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Insulin resistance is a risk marker for non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, and a risk factor for liver disease progression. We assessed temporal trajectories of insulin resistance and β‐cell response to serum glucose concentration throughout adulthood and their association with diabetes risk in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Methods: Three thousand and sixty participants from Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults, a prospective bi‐racial cohort of adults age 18‐30 years at baseline (1985‐1986; Y0) who completed up to 5 exams over 25 years and had fasting insulin and glucose measurement were included. At Y25 (2010‐2011), non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease was assessed by noncontrast computed tomography after exclusion of other liver fat causes. Latent mixture modelling identified 25‐year trajectories in homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance and β‐cell response homeostatic model assessment‐β. Results: Three distinct trajectories were identified, separately, for homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (low‐stable [47%]; moderate‐increasing [42%]; and high‐increasing [12%]) and homeostatic model assessment‐β (low‐decreasing [16%]; moderate‐decreasing [63%]; and high‐decreasing [21%]). Y25 non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence was 24.5%. Among non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease, high‐increasing homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance (referent: low‐stable) was associated with greater prevalent (OR 95% CI = 8.0, 2.0‐31.9) and incident (OR = 10.5, 2.6‐32.8) diabetes after multivariable adjustment including Y0 or Y25 homeostatic model assessment insulin resistance. In contrast, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease participants with low‐decreasing homeostatic model assessment‐β (referent: high‐decreasing) had the highest odds of prevalent (OR = 14.1, 3.9‐50.9) and incident (OR = 10.3, 2.7‐39.3) diabetes. Conclusion: Trajectories of insulin resistance and β‐cell response during young and middle adulthood are robustly associated with diabetes risk in non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease. Thus, how persons with non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease develop resistance to insulin provides important information about risk of diabetes in midlife above and beyond degree of insulin resistance at the time of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Given the lack of long‐term prospective studies, it is challenging for clinicians to make informed decisions about screening and treatment decisions regarding the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) who do not have cirrhosis. Aim: To characterise the pooled risk of HCC in the non‐cirrhosis population. Methods: Published studies were identified through April 2016 in MEDLINE, Scopus, Science Citation Index, AMED and the Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened citations and extracted data. Random effect odds ratios (OR) were calculated to obtain aggregate estimates of effect size between NASH and non‐NASH groups. Between‐study variability and heterogeneity were assessed. Results: Nineteen studies with 168 571 participants were included. Eighty‐six per cent of included subjects had cirrhosis. The prevalence of HCC in non‐cirrhotic NASH was 38.0%; among other aetiologies in non‐cirrhotics, it was 14.2% (P < 0.001). Non‐cirrhotic NASH subjects were at greater odds of developing HCC than non‐cirrhotic subjects of other aetiologies (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.27‐5.35, P = 0.009). When examining all NASH subjects either with or without cirrhosis, those with NASH as the underlying liver disease did not have a significantly increased risk of HCC (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.77‐2.65, P = 0.250). Conclusions: In non‐cirrhotic subjects, those with NASH have a higher risk of HCC compared to other aetiologies of liver disease. Further study investigating the risk factors of HCC among non‐cirrhotic NASH patients is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical practice guidelines can facilitate diagnosis and management of patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH), although their implementation to date has been suboptimal. 1,2 Using recently published 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) practice guidance-based recommendations as a reference, 3 we assessed current real-world management of patients with MASH to identify gaps in clinical practice. We extracted data from the Adelphi Real World MASH Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data capture (from 85 hepatologists, gastroenterologists, and endocrinologists [Supplementary Table 1] and 633 patients [Supplementary Table 2] in the United States between January and June 2022). Two key goals of the AASLD guidance algorithm served as reference points: exclude fibrosis in low-prevalence populations (Goal A) and identify/manage people with 'at-risk' MASH or cirrhosis (Goal B). 3 Patients were split into 2 groups: Goal A comprised 100 patients initially diagnosed by primary care physicians (PCPs)/endocrinologists, and Goal B included 533 patients managed by gastroenterologists/hepatologists., (Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease affects 1 in 4 people in the United States and western Europe, with an important proportion developing metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), the progressive subtype of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Cirrhosis caused by MASH is a leading indication for liver transplantation and the most common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hitherto, there have been no specific pharmacotherapies for MASH. The recent conditional approval by the Food and Drug Administration of resmetirom for the treatment of moderate or advanced MASH presents a much-anticipated therapeutic option for patients with noncirrhotic advanced MASH. Specifically, the intended population for resmetirom are patients with MASH and fibrosis stages 2 or 3. The approval of resmetirom also presents important challenges, including how to noninvasively identify patients with fibrosis stages 2-3, and how to exclude patients with more advanced disease who should not be treated until further data emerge on the use of resmetirom in this population. Herein we consider the available literature with regard to identifying the intended population for treatment with resmetirom and in proposing criteria for stopping treatment., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The 2023 nomenclature defined criteria for steatotic liver disease (SLD), including metabolic dysfunction-associated SLD (MASLD), alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD), and the overlapping MASLD/ALD (MetALD). We aimed to assess racial and ethnic disparities in the SLD prevalence among United States (US) adults based on this new nomenclature., Methods: We undertook a cross-sectional study employing the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. We identified SLD according to a controlled attenuation parameter ≥288 dB/m, liver stiffness ≥7.2 kPa, or elevated aminotransferase levels. Alcohol use thresholds were established according to the updated SLD definition. We estimated prevalences using the complex design of the NHANES survey. Multivariable logistic regressions with complex design weights were employed., Results: A total of 5532 individuals are included. The mean age is 45.4 years, and 50.9% are women. The adjusted estimated prevalence of MASLD is 42.4% (95% CI: 41.1-43.8%), MetALD 1.7% (95% CI: 1.3-2.0%), and ALD 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3-0.8%). Hispanics exhibit a higher prevalence of SLD, but there are no significant differences in advanced fibrosis prevalence due to SLD among racial/ethnic groups. In MASLD, men, individuals aged 40-64 and ≥65 years, Hispanics, those with health insurance, higher BMI, diabetes, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol or use of lipid-lowering agents are independently associated with a higher risk, while Blacks have the lowest risk. In MetALD, men and higher BMI are independently associated with a higher risk of MetALD in adjusted multivariable analysis. In ALD, the adjusted multivariable analysis shows that only health insurance is independently associated with a lower ALD risk., Conclusions: MASLD prevalence is high in the US, especially in men, older individuals, and Hispanics. MetALD and ALD prevalence was substantial but could be underestimated., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a well-recognized complication in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT), particularly those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), a leading cause of cirrhosis in the modern era. This study sought to refine risk stratification for CKD events post-LT in cirrhosis patients with MASH by leveraging baseline renal function at transplant., Methods: A total of 717 MASH cirrhosis patients who had LT (1997-2017) at 7 US centers (NailMASH Consortium) were analyzed. Patients were categorized by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at transplant: low (LGFR, eGFR ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m²), medium (MGFR, eGFR >30-≤60 mL/min/1.73 m²), and high (HGFR, eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m²). Time-related eGFR intercepts, slopes, and assessments of advanced-stage CKD (aCKD) events, defined as 2 eGFR levels <30 mL/min/1.73 m² separated by ≥90 d, were examined., Results: Post-LT, LGFR group showed increased eGFR, whereas the HGFR group experienced a decline. The 3-mo mark was identified as a "reset point," signifying a new reference level, beyond which a different rate of decline was observed. After 3 mo, mean eGFRs of the LGFR group approached MGFRs, whereas the mean eGFR of the HGFR group continued to decrease but remained higher than other groups during a 60-mo follow-up. LGFR patients had significantly higher aCKD probability than MGFR and HGFR groups. Subanalysis at 3 mo post-LT revealed more aCKD events in the LGFR group compared with MGFR and HGFR groups (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: The study underscores renal impact of LT in MASH cirrhosis, indicating unique eGFR trajectories post-LT tied to baseline eGFR, with a reset point at 3 mo. Monitoring post-LT renal function, especially in those at aCKD risk, is crucial. Renal-sparing immunosuppression may help, regardless of baseline eGFR. Further studies are needed for interventions addressing renal dysfunction of patients with MASH post-LT., Competing Interests: M.E.R. is scientific consultant for Akero, 89Bio, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, CytoDyn, Histoindex, Intercept, Madrigal, Sonic Incytes, and Takeda. S.S. received research grants from Gilead, Durect, Fibronostics, Novartis, Zydus, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept. K.W. is the site principle investigator for the MASH study with intercept. M.S. is a consultant for Sagiment DSMB and AMRA. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Steatotic liver disease is a new overarching term that includes metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), metabolic dysfunction and alcohol-related steatotic liver disease (MetALD), and alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). We aimed to validate the prognostic importance of MASLD, MetALD, and ALD as steatotic liver disease subclasses., Methods: Between April 18, 2013, and Sept 17, 2018, we prospectively recruited patients aged 18-75 years with current or previous excessive alcohol intake (>24 g/day for women and >36 g/day for men) for at least a year and no previous hepatic decompensation from the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology at Odense University Hospital (Odense, Denmark). Participants were followed up until Sept 15, 2022. Here, we characterise these patients according to steatotic liver disease subclasses. We classified patients as having MASLD, MetALD, or ALD in accordance with the nomenclature definitions, on the basis of metabolic comorbidity and self-reported average alcohol intake in the 3 months leading up to inclusion. Histological scoring was done by a pathologist who was masked to the clinical data. We compared prognoses between classes using Cox regression analyses on hepatic decompensation and overall mortality as the two outcome measures. Patients not meeting the criteria for steatotic liver disease were classified as no steatotic liver disease and served as a reference group., Findings: We enrolled 446 patients with a history of excessive alcohol intake were included in this analysis (334 [75%] were male and 112 [25%] were female; median age 56 years [SD 10]). Cirrhosis was present in 58 (13%), and 435 (98%) had at least one cardiometabolic risk factor. 321 (72%) met steatotic liver disease criteria and 125 (28%) did not have steatotic liver disease, meaning no evident liver steatosis and no significant fibrosis (≥F2). Of the 321 patients with steatotic liver disease, six (2%) were identified as having ALD due to the absence of cardiometabolic risk factors. The remaining 315 (98%) patients presented with at least one cardiometabolic risk factor. Of these patients, 153 (49%) had MASLD, 76 (24%) had MetALD, and 86 (27%) had ALD. During follow-up, 67 (15%) of 446 patients decompensated and 97 (22%) died (median follow-up 70 months [IQR 53-94]). Patients with steatotic liver disease had a significantly higher risk of hepatic decompensation and overall mortality than those without steatotic liver disease, independent of age, sex, and liver stiffness. The risk of decompensation increased in a stepwise manner from MASLD (hazard ratio 4·73 [95% CI 1·03-21·6]), through MetALD (7·69 [1·66-35·6]), to ALD (10·2 [2·24-46·4]). Similarly, overall mortality increased from MASLD (HR 2·30 [95% CI 1·08-4·90]), through MetALD (2·94 [1·31-6·58]), to ALD (3·57 [1·64-7·80]), independent of age, sex, and liver stiffness., Interpretation: Steatotic liver disease and its subclasses portend distinct prognoses. There is a need to specify how historical alcohol intake should be integrated into the nomenclature and risk stratification of steatotic liver disease., Funding: EU Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests JKH has received speaking fees from Norgine. CW received an EASL bursary to attend the International Liver Congress (ILC) 2023. KPL received an EASL bursary to attend ILC 2023, has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk and speaking fees and support for travel from Siemens, and owns stock in Evido. EAT has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Boehringer, Pfizer, and Siemens, and speaking fees from Echosens, NovoNordisk, and Dr Falk. MT has received grants from the Novo Nordisk Foundation, consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca, speaking fees from Siemens Healthcare, Norgine, Echosens, Tillotts Pharma, Takeda, and Madrigal; and is vice chair on the board of non-governmental organisation Alcohol & Society and co-founder and board member for Evido. MER, in the past 24 months, has done scientific consulting for Boehringer Ingelheim, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Madrigal, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, GlaxoSmithKline, Sonic Incytes, Histoindex, Takeda, and CytoDyn, and has received support for travel to symposia from GlaxoSmithKline and Novo Nordisk. AK has received grants from EU Horizon 2020, the Novo Nordisk Foundation, Innovationfund Denmark, the Danish National Research Foundation, Region of Southern Denmark, and AstraZeneca; receives royalties from Gyldendal as a co-author on a textbook of internal medicine; served as speaker for Novo Nordisk, Norgine, Siemens, and Nordic Bioscience; and participated in advisory boards for Norgine, Siemens, Resalis Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk, all outside the submitted work. AK has also received research support from Norgine, Siemens, Nordic Bioscience, AstraZeneca, and Echosens, does consulting for Takeda, Resalis Therapeutics, Zealand Pharma, and AlphaSights, and is a board member and co-founder Evido. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Fatty liver disease is a major public health threat due to its very high prevalence and related morbidity and mortality. Focused and dedicated interventions are urgently needed to target disease prevention, treatment, and care., Approach and Results: We developed an aligned, prioritized action agenda for the global fatty liver disease community of practice. Following a Delphi methodology over 2 rounds, a large panel (R1 n = 344, R2 n = 288) reviewed the action priorities using Qualtrics XM, indicating agreement using a 4-point Likert-scale and providing written feedback. Priorities were revised between rounds, and in R2, panelists also ranked the priorities within 6 domains: epidemiology, treatment and care, models of care, education and awareness, patient and community perspectives, and leadership and public health policy. The consensus fatty liver disease action agenda encompasses 29 priorities. In R2, the mean percentage of "agree" responses was 82.4%, with all individual priorities having at least a super-majority of agreement (> 66.7% "agree"). The highest-ranked action priorities included collaboration between liver specialists and primary care doctors on early diagnosis, action to address the needs of people living with multiple morbidities, and the incorporation of fatty liver disease into relevant non-communicable disease strategies and guidance., Conclusions: This consensus-driven multidisciplinary fatty liver disease action agenda developed by care providers, clinical researchers, and public health and policy experts provides a path to reduce the prevalence of fatty liver disease and improve health outcomes. To implement this agenda, concerted efforts will be needed at the global, regional, and national levels., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests Manal F. Abdelmalek consults, advises, and received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, and Madrigal. She consults and advises 89Bio, Merck, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Sonic Incytes, and Theratechnologies. She is on the speakers’ bureau for the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation, Clinical Care Options, Fishawack, Medscape, and Terra Firma. She received grants from Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Durect, Enanta, Enyo, Galmed, Genentech, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Target NASH, and Viking. Quentin M. Anstee, on behalf of Newcastle University, consults for Alimentiv, Akero, AstraZeneca, Axcella, 89Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed, GENFIT, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, Hanmi, HistoIndex, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, Medpace, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Pfizer, Pharmanest, Prosciento, Poxel, RTI, Resolution Therapeutics, Ridgeline Therapeutics, Roche, Shionogi, and Terns. He is on the speakers’ bureau for Fishawack, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Novo Nordisk, Madrigal, Medscape, and Springer Healthcare. He received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Intercept. He holds intellectual property rights with Elsevier, Ltd. Ramon Bataller is on the speakers’ bureau for Abbvie and Gilead. Ulrich Beuers consults for CSL Behring. He is on the speakers’ bureau for Abacus and Zambon. Elisabetta Bugianesi advises Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, and Novo Nordisk. Helena Cortez-Pinto consults and received grants from Novo Nordisk and Roche. She received grants from Eisai, Gilead, GMP-Orphan, and Intercept. Kenneth Cusi Consults for Aligos, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Covance, Lilly, Madrigal, Myovant, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento, Sagimet, and Siemens. He received grants from Echosens, Inventiva, LabCorp, Nordic Biosciences, and Target NASH. Sven M. Francque consults and received grants from Astellas, Falk, GENFIT, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Janssen, Inventiva, Merck, Pfizer, and Roche. He consults for AbbVie., Actelion, Aelin Therapeutics, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Coherus, CSL Behring, Echosens, Eisai, ENYO, Galapagos, Galmed, Genetech, Intercept, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Medimmune, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Promethera. Samer Gawrieh consults for Pfizer and TransMedics. He received grants from LiverIncytes, Viking, and Zydus. Manuel Romero-Gómez advises and received grants from Novo Nordisk and Siemens. He advises AbbVie., Alpha-sigma, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Intercept, Inventia, Kaleido, MSD, Pfizer, Prosciento, Rubió, Shionogi, Sobi, and Zydus. He received grants from Echosens and Theratechnologies. Cynthia D. Guy consults for 89Bio, CymaBay, HistoIndex, Madrigal, and NGM. Stephen Harrison consults, advises, is involved with trials, received grants, and owns stock in Akero, Galectin, GENFIT, Hepion, and NGM Bio. He consults, advises, is involved with trials, and received grants from Axcella, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, and Poxel. He consults, advises, received grants, and owns stock in NorthSea Therapeutics. He consults, advises, and is involved with trials for Terns. He consults, advises, and received grants from HighTide, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sagimet. He consults, advises, and owns stock in HistoIndex, Metacrine, and Sonic Incytes. He consults, received grants, and owns stock in Cirius. He consults, is involved with trials, and received grants from ENYO and Viking. He is involved with trials and received grants from Genentech. He consults and is involved with trials for Ionis. He consults and received grants from CiVi, CymaBay, Galmed, and Pfizer. He consults and owns stock in Hepta Bio. He consults and advises for Altimmune, Echosens North America, Foresite Labs, and Medpace. He advises and owns stock in ChronWell. He consults for AgomAb, Alentis, Aligos Therapeutics, Alimentiv, Blade, Bluejay, Boston Pharmaceuticals, Boxer Capital, CanFite BioPharma, the Chronic Liver Disease Foundation (CLDF), CohBar, Corcept, Fibronostics, Fortress Biotech, Galecto, Gelesis, GSK, GNS Healthcare, GRI Bio, Hepagene, Indalo, Inipharm, Innovate Biopharmaceuticals, Kowa Research Institute, Merck, MGGM, NeuroBo, Nutrasource, Perspectum, Piper Sandler, Prometic (now Liminal BioSciences), Ridgeline Therapeutics, Silverback, and Zafgen (now Larimar). He advises Arrowhead BVF Partners, Humana, and Pathai. He received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Conatus, Immuron, and Second Genome. Samuel Klein advises Alnylam, Altimmune, and Merck. Kris V. Kowdley advises, is on the speakers’ bureau, and received grants from Gilead and Intercept. He advises, received grants, and owns stock in Inipharm. He advises and received grants from 89bio, CymaBay, GENFIT, Ipsen, Madrigal, Mirum, NGM Bio, Pfizer, Pliant, and Zeds. He advises Enact, HighTide, and Protagonist. He is on the speakers’ bureau for AbbVie. He received grants from Boston Pharmaceuticals, Corcept, GSK, Hanmi, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Terns, and Viking. Jeffrey V. Lazarus consults for Novavax. He received grants from AbbVie, Gilead, MSD, and Roche Diagnostics. Rohit Loomba consults and received grants from Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galmed, Gilead, Intercept, Inventiva, Ionis, Janssen, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, NGM Bio, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Terns. He consults and owns stock in 89Bio and Sagimet. Consults for Altimmune, Anylam, Amgen, CohBar, Glympse Bio, HighTide, Inipharm, Metacrine, Novartis, Regeneron, Theratechnologies, and Viking. He received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Galectin Therapeutics, Hanmi, and Sonic Incytes. He cofounded and owns stock in LipoNexus. Phillip N. Newsome consults, advises, is on the speakers’ bureau, and received grants from Novo Nordisk. He consults and advises Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, GSK, Intercept, Madrigal, Pfizer, Poxel, and Sun Pharma. He is on the speakers’ bureau for AiCME. Elizabeth E. Powell advises and received grants from Novo Nordisk. Vlad Ratziu consults and received grants from Intercept. He consults for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eny, Madrigal, NorthSea, Novo Nordisk, E. Poxel, and Sagimet. He received grants from Gilead. Mary E. Rinella consults for Boehringer Ingelheim, CytoDyn, GSK, Novo Nordisk, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM Bio, and Sonic Incytes. Michael Roden consults and received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and Novo Nordisk. He consults for Lilly. He is on the speakers’ bureau for AstraZeneca. Arun J. Sanyal consults and advises Avant Santé and AstraZeneca. He consults and received grants from Akero, Bristol Myers Squibb, Intercept, Lilly, Madrigal, and Novo Nordisk. He consults and owns stock in Rivus. He consults for AGED Diagnostics, Albireo, Alnylam, Altimmune, Boehringer Ingelhiem, 89Bio, Echosense, Genentech, Gilead, GSK, HistoIndex, Malinckrodt, Merck, NGM Bio, Novartis, PathAI, Pfizer, Poxel, Regeneron, Salix, Siemens, Surrozen, Takeda, Terns, and Zydus. He owns stock in Durect, Exhalenz, GENFIT, Indalo, Inversago, and Tiziana. He received royalties from Elsevier and Wolters Kluwer. Marcelo Silva consults, advises, and received grants from Zydus. He received grants from Inventiva and MSD. Dina Tiniakos consults for Clinnovate Health, ICON, Ionis, Inventiva, Merck, and Verily. Luca Valenti consults and received grants from Gilead. He consults for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Resalis Therapeutics. Miriam B. Vos consults and advises Thiogenesis. She consults and received grants from Target Real World Evidence. She consults and owns stock in Intercept. She consults for Albireo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Takeda. She received grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Quest, and Sonic Incytes. Vincent Wai-Sun Wong consults and received grants from Gilead. He consults for AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet, and TARGET PharmaSolutions. He owns stock in Illuminatio Medical Technology. Yusuf Yilmaz consults for Zydus. He advises Novo Nordisk. He is on the speakers’ bureau for Echosens. Zobair Younossi consults for Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Intercept, Madrigal, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Quest, Siemens, and Terns. The remaining authors have no conflicts to report., (Copyright © 2023 Mary E. Rinella, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Vlad Ratziu, Sven M. Francque, Arun J. Sanyal, Fasiha Kanwal, Diana Romero, Manal F. Abdelmalek, Quentin M. Anstee, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Ramon Bataller, Ulrich Beuers, Jerome Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Christopher D. Byrne, Graciela E. Castro Narro, Abhijit Chowdhury, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Donna Cryer, Kenneth Cusi, Mohamed El-Kassas, Samuel Klein, Wayne Eskridge, Jiangao Fan, Samer Gawrieh, Cynthia D. Guy, Stephen A. Harrison, Seung Up Kim, Bart Koot, Marko Korenjak, Kris Kowdley, Florence Lacaille, Rohit Loomba, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Timothy R. Morgan, Elisabeth Powell, Michael Roden, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Marcelo Silva, Shivaram Prasad Singh, Silvia C. Sookoian, C. Wendy Spearman, Dina Tiniakos, Luca Valenti, Miriam B. Vos, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Stavra Xanthakos, Yusuf Yilmaz, Zobair Younossi, Ansley Hobbs, Marcela Villota-Rivas, Philip N. Newsome (senior), NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

As morbidity and mortality related to potentially preventable liver diseases are on the rise globally, early detection of liver fibrosis offers a window of opportunity to prevent disease progression. Early detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease allows for initiation and reinforcement of guidance on bodyweight management, risk stratification for advanced liver fibrosis, and treatment optimisation of diabetes and other metabolic complications. Identification of alcohol-related liver disease provides the opportunity to support patients with detoxification and abstinence programmes. In all patient groups, identification of cirrhosis ensures that patients are enrolled in surveillance programmes for hepatocellular carcinoma and portal hypertension. When considering early detection strategies, success can be achieved from applying ad-hoc screening for liver fibrosis in established frameworks of care. Patients with type 2 diabetes are an important group to consider case findings of advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis, as up to 19% have advanced fibrosis (which is ten times higher than the general population) and almost 70% have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Additionally, patients with type 2 diabetes with alcohol use disorders have the highest proportion of liver-related morbidity of people with type 2 diabetes generally. Patients with type 2 diabetes receive an annual diabetes review as part of their routine clinical care, in which the health of many organs are considered. Yet, liver health is seldom included in this review. This Viewpoint argues that augmenting the existing risk stratification strategy with an additional liver health check provides the opportunity to detect advanced liver fibrosis, thereby opening a window for early interventions to prevent end-stage liver disease and its complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma., Competing Interests: Conflict of interests LV reports consulting fees from Gilead, Pfizer, Astra Zeneca, Novo Nordisk, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Diatech Pharmacogenetics, IONIS, and Boehringer Ingelheim; grant support from Gilead; and speaker fees from MSD, Gilead, AlfaSigma, AbbVie, and Viatris. JFD reports consulting fees from Intelligent Ultrasound and speaker fees for Gilead and GE systems. AMA reports consulting fees from NovoNordisk and grant support from Target, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer. MN reports consulting fees from Altimmune, Cytodyn, 89bio, GlaxoSmithKline, Madrigal, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Northsea Therapeutics, Perspectum, Terns, and Takeda; grant support from Allergan, Akero, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Galectin, Genfit, GlaxoSmithKline, Conatus, Corcept, Enanta, Madrigal, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Shire, Takeda, Terns, Viking, and Zydus; and stock options with Rivus Pharma, CIMA, Cytodyn, and ChronWell. MER reports consulting fees from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Genfit, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Enanta, Immuron, Fractyl, Prociento, Gelesis, Merck, Bristol Myers Squibb, Metacrine, Viking Therapeutics, Allergan, Cymabay, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, 89bio, Galecto, Terns, Sagimet, Thetis, Fractyl, Lipicine, GSK, Coherus, and Novartis. FT reports consulting fees for Allergan, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Gilead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer, Intercept, Ionis, Inventiva, Merz, Pfizer, Alnylam, NGM Biopharma, CSL Behring, Madrigal, Novo Nordisk, and Novartis; grant support from Allergan, Bristol Myers Squibb, Inventiva, and Gilead (funding to institution); speaker fees from Gilead, AbbVie, Falk, Merz, Intercept, Sanofi, and AstraZeneca; expert testimony for Alnylam; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Pfizer; and travel support from Gilead. SF reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Actelion, Aelin Therapeutics, Aligos Therapeutics, Allergan, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyers Squibb, CSL Behring, Coherus, Echosens, Eisai, Enyo, Galapagos, Galmed, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Janssens Pharmaceutica, Julius Clinical, Madrigal, Medimmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NGM Bio, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Promethera, and Roche; research grants from Astellas, Falk Pharma, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, GlympsBio, Janssens Pharmaceutica, Inventiva, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, and Roche; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Eisai, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Janssens Cilag, Intercept, Inventiva, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novo Nordisk, and Promethera. MT reports speaker fees from Echosens and Siemens Healthcare. PNN reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Intercept, Madrigal, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Novo Nordisk, Poxel Pharamceuticals, and Sun Pharma and grant support from Novo Nordisk. ING reports grant support from Gilead. JMS reports consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery, Albireo Pharma, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Inventiva Pharma, Madrigal, MSD, Northsea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and Siemens Healthineers; grant support from Gilead Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Siemens Healthcare; and speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, MedPublico, Novo Nordisk, and Madrigal Pharmaceuticals. AB reports consulting fees from Inventiva and grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim. AGH reports consulting fees from Inventiva, Echosens, Novo Nordisk, Gilead, and Julius Clinical. CC reports consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Gilead, AstraZeneca, Bayer, E-Scopics, Intercept, and Lilly; research support from Echosens, E-scopics, and Gilead; and speaker fees from Madrigal, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Novo Nordisk, Lilly, and LVL. KC reports consulting fees from Altimmune, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Covance, 89bio, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Madrigal, Merck, Myovant, Novo Nordisk, Prosciento, Quest, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes, and Terns and grant support from Echosens, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Nordic Bioscience, Poxel, Labcorp, and Zydus. MR reports consulting fees from Boehringer, Pfizer, Novo Nordisk, and Eli Lilly and grant support from Boehringer, Novo Nordisk, Nutricia Danone, and Sanofi. HH reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca and grant support from AstraZeneca, EchoSens, Gilead, Intercept, MSD, and Pfizer. VW-SW reports consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Echosens, Gilead Sciences, Intercept, Inventiva, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet Biosciences, TARGET PharmaSolutions, and Visirna; speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Novo Nordisk, and Unilab; travel support from AbbVie and Gilead Sciences; grant support from Gilead Sciences; and stock options for Illuminatio Medical Technology. LC reports consulting fees from Echosens, Madrigal, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet, and Siemens Healthineers and speaker fees from Echosens, Inventiva, and Novo Nordisk. JVL reports grants and speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, MSD, and Roche Diagnostics and speaker fees from Intercept, Jannsen, Novo Nordisk, and ViiV, outside of the submitted work. EAT reports consulting fees from Alexion, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Boehringer, Orphalan, and Univar and speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, Orphalan, and Dr Falk. All other authors report no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favour of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panellists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms "nonalcoholic" and "fatty" were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140-350 g/wk and 210-420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and non-stigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification., (Copyright © 2023 Mary E. Rinella, Jeffrey V. Lazarus, Vlad Ratziu, Sven M. Francque, Arun J. Sanyal, Fasiha Kanwal, Diana Romero, Manal F. Abdelmalek, Quentin M. Anstee, Juan Pablo Arab, Marco Arrese, Ramon Bataller, Ulrich Beuers, Jerome Boursier, Elisabetta Bugianesi, Christopher Byrne, Graciela E. Castro Narro, Abhijit Chowdhury, Helena Cortez-Pinto, Donna Cryer, Kenneth Cusi, Mohamed El-Kassas, Samuel Klein, Wayne Eskridge, Jiangao Fan, Samer Gawrieh, Cynthia D. Guy, Stephen A. Harrison, Seung Up Kim, Bart Koot, Marko Korenjak, Kris Kowdley, Florence Lacaille, Rohit Loomba, Robert Mitchell-Thain, Timothy R. Morgan, Elisabeth Powell, Michael Roden, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Marcelo Silva, Shivaram Prasad Singh, Silvia C. Sookoian, C. Wendy Spearman, Dina Tiniakos, Luca Valenti, Miriam B. Vos, Vincent Wai-Sun Wong, Stavra Xanthakos, Yusuf Yilmaz, Zobair Younossi, Ansley Hobbs, Marcela Villota-Rivas, Philip N. Newsome, NAFLD Nomenclature consensus group. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Progression of chronic liver disease is precipitated by hepatocyte loss, inflammation and fibrosis. This process results in the loss of critical hepatic functions, increasing morbidity and the risk of infection. Medical interventions that treat complications of hepatic failure, including antibiotic administration for systemic infections and lactulose treatment for hepatic encephalopathy, can impact gut microbiome composition and metabolite production. Here, using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and targeted metabolomic analyses on 847 faecal samples from 262 patients with acute or chronic liver disease, we demonstrate that patients hospitalized for liver disease have reduced microbiome diversity and a paucity of bioactive metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids and bile acid derivatives, that impact immune defences and epithelial barrier integrity. We find that patients treated with the orally administered but non-absorbable disaccharide lactulose have increased densities of intestinal bifidobacteria and reduced incidence of systemic infections and mortality. Bifidobacteria metabolize lactulose, produce high concentrations of acetate and acidify the gut lumen in humans and mice, which, in combination, can reduce the growth of antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in vitro. Our studies suggest that lactulose and bifidobacteria serve as a synbiotic to reduce rates of infection in patients with severe liver disease., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background & Aims: An estimated 38% of adults worldwide have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). From individual impacts to widespread public health and economic consequences, the implications of this disease are profound. This study aimed to develop an aligned, prioritised fatty liver disease research agenda for the global health community., Methods: Nine co-chairs drafted initial research priorities, subsequently reviewed by 40 core authors and debated during a three-day in-person meeting. Following a Delphi methodology, over two rounds, a large panel (R1 n = 344, R2 n = 288) reviewed the priorities, via Qualtrics XM, indicating agreement using a four-point Likert-scale and providing written feedback. The core group revised the draft priorities between rounds. In R2, panellists also ranked the priorities within six domains: epidemiology, models of care, treatment and care, education and awareness, patient and community perspectives, and leadership and public health policy., Results: The consensus-built fatty liver disease research agenda encompasses 28 priorities. The mean percentage of 'agree' responses increased from 78.3 in R1 to 81.1 in R2. Five priorities received unanimous combined agreement ('agree' + 'somewhat agree'); the remaining 23 priorities had >90% combined agreement. While all but one of the priorities exhibited at least a super-majority of agreement (>66.7% 'agree'), 13 priorities had <80% 'agree', with greater reliance on 'somewhat agree' to achieve >90% combined agreement., Conclusions: Adopting this multidisciplinary consensus-built research priorities agenda can deliver a step-change in addressing fatty liver disease, mitigating against its individual and societal harms and proactively altering its natural history through prevention, identification, treatment, and care. This agenda should catalyse the global health community's efforts to advance and accelerate responses to this widespread and fast-growing public health threat., Impact and Implications: An estimated 38% of adults and 13% of children and adolescents worldwide have fatty liver disease, making it the most prevalent liver disease in history. Despite substantial scientific progress in the past three decades, the burden continues to grow, with an urgent need to advance understanding of how to prevent, manage, and treat the disease. Through a global consensus process, a multidisciplinary group agreed on 28 research priorities covering a broad range of themes, from disease burden, treatment, and health system responses to awareness and policy. The findings have relevance for clinical and non-clinical researchers as well as funders working on fatty liver disease and non-communicable diseases more broadly, setting out a prioritised, ranked research agenda for turning the tide on this fast-growing public health threat., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterised by hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and injury, and is associated with an increased risk of liver transplantation and death. NASH affects more than 16 million people in the USA, and there is no approved therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aldafermin, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19)., Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study (ALPINE 2/3) in patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis, we randomly assigned patients stratified by fibrosis stage in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo, aldafermin 0·3 mg, 1·0 mg, or 3·0 mg once daily for 24 weeks at 30 study sites in the USA. Patients, investigators, the funder, and all other staff, were masked to treatment assignment throughout the study. The primary endpoint was an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH at week 24. Analyses were done by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03912532, and has been completed., Findings: Between May 16, 2019, and Sept 4, 2020, 786 patients were screened, of whom 171 were randomly assigned to a treatment group and included in the intention-to-treat population: 43 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, 42 in the 1·0 mg group, 43 in the 3·0 mg group, and 43 in the placebo group. In total, 145 (85%) of patients completed treatment. At week 24, among patients with biopsies at both baseline and week 24, was seven (19%) of 36 patients in the placebo group, 11 (31%) of 36 in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group (difference 90% CI 12% [-9 to 33]; p=0·11), five (15%) of 34 patients in the 1·0 mg group (difference -5% [-24 to 13]; p=0·80), and 11 (30%) of 37 patients in the 3·0 mg group (difference 10% [-9 to 30]; p=0·12) had an improvement in liver fibrosis of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, without meeting the prespecified significance for dose response (p=0·55). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate in severity. Diarrhoea occurred in six (14%) of 43 patients in the placebo group, three (7%) of 43 patients in the 0·3 mg aldafermin group, five (12%) of 41 patients in the 1·0 mg group, and ten (23%) of 43 patients in the 3·0 mg group. Incidences of serious adverse events and discontinuations owing to adverse events were similar between groups., Interpretation: Aldafermin was generally well tolerated but did not produce a significant dose response on fibrosis improvement of at least one stage with no worsening of NASH, despite positive effects on a number of secondary endpoints. The findings of this trial may have implications for the design of future NASH trials., Funding: NGM Biopharmaceuticals., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SAH reports grant and research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genentech, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Pfizer, Sagimet, Viking, and 89 Bio; is a scientific advisor or consultant for Akero, Alentis, Altimmune, Arrowhead, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Echosens, Forest Labs, Galectin, Gilead, Hepion, Hepagene, HistoIndex, Intercept, Madrigal, Medpace, Metacrine, NGM, Northsea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PathAI, Poxel, Sagimet, Sonic Incytes, Terns, and Viking; and has stock options in Akero, Cirius, Chronwell, Galectin, Genfit, Hepion, HistoIndex, Metacrine, NGM, and Northsea. MFA reports grant and research support from Allergan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringher Ingelheim, Celgene, Genentech, Hanmi, Intercept, Inventiva, Magrigal, NGM, NovoNordisk, and Viking; is a consultant for Hanmi and Madrigal; and serves on an advisory committee for 89Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hanmi, NGM, Novo Nordisk, and Thera. CDG reports grant and research support from 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM; and is a consultant for 89Bio, CymaBay, Madrigal, and NGM. NA reports serving on advisory boards for 89Bio, Gilead, Intercept, LG Chem, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Terns, and Zydus; is a speaker for AbbVie, Alexion, Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, Perspectum, and Simply Speaking; and has received research support from 89Bio, Akero, Albireo, Allergan, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Corcept, Gilead, Galmed, Galectin, Genfit, Enanta, Enyo, Fibronostics, Hanmi, Hepagene, Inventiva, Madrigal, Merck, Metacrine, Northsea, Noom, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, and Zydus. MRB reports grant and research support from the National Institutes of Health (5U01-DK061713-19, 1R01CA249765-01) as well as Carmot, Corcept, CymaBay, Diabetes & Endocrinology Consultants, Madrigal, Metacrine, NGM, Pinnacle Clinical Research, Polarean Imaging, and Siemens Healthineers. MER reports consulting for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vBio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. MSS reports consulting for Pfizer and serves on an advisory committee for AMRA. MK reports research grants from Medtronic, SARO, Pfizer, Dexcom, Abbott, Regenacy, Metacrine, Lumos, Ascendis, Sagimet, MannKind, Aeterna-Zentaris, 89Bio, Gilead, Senseonics, KOWA, Allergan, NGM, Tolerion, and Lilly, and is on an advisory board for Quest Diagnostics. ZHY reports grant and research support from Gilead, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cymabay, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Conatus, Novartis, Allergan, Intercept, and Novo Nordisk, and is a consultant for Gilead. MB reports grant support from the National Institutes of Health. SJB reports serving on a scientific advisory board for Altimmune, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi, and is a consultant for Altimmune, Amgen, Madrigal, Novartis, Regeneron, and Sanofi. BB reports research support from Akero, Axcella, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Conatus, Cymabay, Enyo, Galectin, Genfit, Gilead, Hepion, Hightide, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Northsea, Viking, AbbVie, Gynkotex, GlaxoSmithKline, Arena, Protagonist, Mirum, Eli Lilly, Ionis, and Poxel. PJR reports serving as speaker and adviser for Gilead Sciences and ViiV. PJT reports grant and research support from AbbVie, Allergan, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cara, Celgene, Cirius, Conatus, Cymabay, Dova, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Elobix, Enanta, Enyo, Exelixis, Gilead, HighTide, Intercept, Mallinckrodt, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sillajen, and Targ, and is a consultant for Mallinckrodt. MG, MK, CC, LM-K, WC, AMD, LL, and HDL report being employees and stockholders of NGM. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to endocrinologists, primary care clinicians, health care professionals, and other stakeholders., Methods: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology conducted literature searches for relevant articles published from January 1, 2010, to November 15, 2021. A task force of medical experts developed evidence-based guideline recommendations based on a review of clinical evidence, expertise, and informal consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development., Recommendation Summary: This guideline includes 34 evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the diagnosis and management of persons with NAFLD and/or NASH and contains 385 citations that inform the evidence base., Conclusion: NAFLD is a major public health problem that will only worsen in the future, as it is closely linked to the epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given this link, endocrinologists and primary care physicians are in an ideal position to identify persons at risk on to prevent the development of cirrhosis and comorbidities. While no U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved medications to treat NAFLD are currently available, management can include lifestyle changes that promote an energy deficit leading to weight loss; consideration of weight loss medications, particularly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; and bariatric surgery, for persons who have obesity, as well as some diabetes medications, such as pioglitazone and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, for those with type 2 diabetes mellitus and NASH. Management should also promote cardiometabolic health and reduce the increased cardiovascular risk associated with this complex disease., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background & Aims: EDP-305 is an oral farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist under development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Herein, we aimed to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of EDP-305 in patients with fibrotic NASH., Methods: In this double-blind phase II study, patients with fibrotic NASH (without cirrhosis), diagnosed by historical biopsy or phenotypically, were randomized to EDP-305 1 mg, EDP-305 2.5 mg, or placebo, for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to Week 12, and the key secondary endpoint was mean change in liver fat content from baseline to Week 12., Results: Between January 2018 and July 2019, 134 patients were randomized and 132 were evaluated. At Week 12, the least squares mean reductions from baseline in ALT for patients receiving 2.5 mg EDP-305 and 1 mg EDP-305 were -27.9 U/L (95% CI 0.03 to 24.9; p = 0.049) and -21.7 U/L (-5.8 to 18.3: p = 0.304), respectively, compared to -15.4 U/L for those receiving placebo. Absolute liver fat reduction was -7.1% (2.0-7.5; p = 0.0009) with 2.5 mg EDP-305, -3.3% with EDP-305 1 mg, and -2.4% with placebo. The most common (≥5%) adverse events were pruritus, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, and dizziness. Pruritus occurred in 50.9%, 9.1%, and 4.2% of patients in the 2.5 mg, 1 mg, and placebo groups, respectively, and led to study drug discontinuation in 20.8% of patients in the 2.5 mg group and 1.8% in the 1 mg group., Conclusions: EDP-305 reduced ALT levels and liver fat content, providing support for a longer-term trial assessing histological endpoints in patients with NASH. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT03421431 LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a chronic hepatic disease that can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which is associated with an increased risk of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Results from this phase II study support continued development of EDP-305, an oral farnesoid X receptor agonist, for the treatment of patients with NASH., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest KK received support from Enanta paid to his institution; grants or contracts from Intercept, Gilead, NGM, Madrigal, Pfizer, Enanta, Viking, Celgene, Terns, Corcept paid to his institution; speaker’s and teaching honoraria or consulting fees from Intercept, Gilead, and Inipharm; Stock or stock options from Inipharm. EL received research grants from 89Bio, Allergan Inc, Akero Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Astrazeneca, Axcella Health, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boeringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Durect Corporation, Eli Lilly and Company, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Enyo, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Hanmi Pharmaceuticals, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Laboratory for Advanced Medicine, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Metacrine, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Poxel, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Terns Pharmaceuticals, Viking Therapeutics, Zydus. AS reports research grants from Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Madrigal, Viking Therapeutics, NovoNordisk, Bristol-Myers Squibb, NorthSea Therapeutics, Galectin, NGM Therapeutics, Intercept, Hepion, Allergan, Ionis, and Boehringer Ingelheim, and stock options from Gilead. B N-T received grants or contracts from Allergan, BMS, Cirius, Enanta, Genfit, Gilead, HighTide, Intercept, Madrigal, NGM payed to Saint Louis University. Payments for DSMB or Advisory Board participation by Akero, Alimentiv, Allergan, Allysta, Alnylam, Amgen, Arrowhead, Axcella, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Coherus, Cymabay, Durect, Enanta, Fortress, Genfit, Gilead, High Tide, HistoIndex, Innovo, Intercept, Ionis, LG Chem, Lipocine, Madrigal, Medimmune, Merck, Mirum, NGM, NovoNordisk, Novus Therapeutics, pH-Pharma, Sagimet, Target RWE, Theratechnologies, 89Bio. Stock or stock options in HepGene; Honoraria from American Diabetes Association, American Gastroenterological Associations, Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver, Clinical Care Options, Houston Methodist Hospital, NASH Summit, NASH-TAG. ME received support from Enanta Pharmaceuticals for this study; grants or contracts from AbbVie, Gilead, Genfit, Intercept, Assembly, Madrigal, and Novartis; consulting fees from AbbVie, Gilead, and Intercept; and honoraria from AbbVie. JD received support from Enanta Pharmaceuticals for this study. DD, TK, MR, and TD have nothing to disclose. BG, AA, and NA are employees and may be stockholders of Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. VR has received consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novo-Nordisk, Galmed, Terns, Theratechnologies, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Genfit, Madrigal, and NGM Bio. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic, progressive fibrotic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. While liver biopsy is considered the reference standard for the histologic diagnosis of NASH and staging of fibrosis, its use in clinical practice is limited. Non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly being used to identify and stage liver fibrosis in patients with NASH, and several can assess liver-related outcomes. We report changes in various NITs in patients treated with obeticholic acid (OCA) or placebo in the phase III REGENERATE study., Methods: Patients with NASH and fibrosis stage F2 or F3 (n = 931) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo, OCA 10 mg, or OCA 25 mg once daily. Various NITs based on clinical chemistry and/or imaging were evaluated at baseline and throughout the study., Results: Rapid, sustained reductions from baseline in alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, as well as in Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), FibroTest, FibroMeter, and FibroScan-AST scores were observed in OCA-treated vs. placebo-treated patients. Reduction in liver stiffness by vibration-controlled transient elastography was observed in the OCA 25 mg group vs. the placebo group at Month 18. NIT changes were associated with shifts in histologic fibrosis stage. The greatest improvements were observed in patients with ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement; however, improvements in ALT, AST, FIB-4, and FibroTest were also observed in OCA-treated patients whose histologic fibrosis remained stable., Conclusions: Based on the REGENERATE Month 18 interim analysis, rapid and sustained improvements in various NITs were observed with OCA treatment. Dynamic changes in selected NITs separated histologic responders from non-responders. These results suggest that NITs may be useful in assessing histologic response to OCA therapy. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Number: NCT02548351 LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic, progressive liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. To diagnose and assess liver fibrosis (scarring) in patients with NASH, non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly being used rather than liver biopsy, which is invasive, expensive, and can be risky. In the REGENERATE study, which is evaluating the effects of obeticholic acid vs. placebo in patients with NASH, various NITs were also evaluated. This analysis shows that improvements in levels of certain blood components, as well as favorable results of ultrasound imaging and proprietary tests of liver function, were associated with improvements in liver fibrosis after treatment with obeticholic acid, suggesting that NITs may be useful alternatives to liver biopsy in assessing NASH patients' response to therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest MR was a consultant over the past 36 months for Alnylam, Amgen, AMRA, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Centara, Coherus, Enanta, Galecto, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Fractyl, Gelesis, Siemens, Thetis, Terns, Rivus, 3vbio (Sagimet), 89Bio, and Novartis. She currently has no active consulting contracts. J-FD reports advisory committee participation for AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Falk, Genfit, Genkyotex, Gilead Sciences, HepaRegeniX, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Lilly, Merck, Novartis; speaking and teaching fees from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Genfit, Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Roche. QMA reports support from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in relation to the present study; research funds as Coordinator of the EU IMI-2 LITMUS consortium, which is funded by the EU Horizon 2020 programme and EFPIA. This multi-stakeholder consortium includes industry partners, in addition, Allergan/Tobira, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Glympse Bio, Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Ltd; royalties or licenses from Elsevier Ltd; consulting fees from 89Bio, Allergan/Tobira, Altimmune, AstraZeneca, Axcella, Blade, BMS, BNN Cardio, Cirius, CymaBay, EcoR1, E3Bio, Eli Lilly & Company Ltd., Galmed, Genentech, Genfit SA, Gilead, Grunthal, HistoIndex, Indalo, Intercept Pharma Europe Ltd., Inventiva, IQVIA, Janssen, Madrigal, MedImmune, Medpace, Metacrine, NGMBio, North Sea Therapeutics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk A/S, PathAI, Pfizer Ltd., Poxel, ProSciento, Raptor Pharma, Roche, Servier, Terns, The Medicines Company, Viking Therapeutics; honoraria from Abbott Laboratories, Allergan/Tobira, BMS, Clinical Care Options, Falk, Fishawack, Genfit SA, Gilead, Integritas Communications, Kenes, Medscape; member of advisory board for Medpace (NorthSea Therapeutics). ZG has no conflicts to report. ZY reports consulting fees and research grants from Gilead Sciences, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BMS, Novo Nordisk, Viking, Terns, Siemens, Quest, AbbVie, Madrigal, Merck, and Novartis. SAH reports consulting/advisory, stock ownership/equity from Akero, Galectin, Genfit, Madrigal, Metacrine, Histoindex and NGM Bio; grants from Axcella, Cirius, CymaBay, Galectin, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, HighTide, Madrigal, NGM, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Second Genome; consulting/advisory for Alentis, Axcella, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, CiVi, CLDF, Corcept, Echosens, , Gilead, HighTide, Medpace, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Perspectum, Prometric, Viking, Hepagene, Hepion, and Terns. RL reports research grants from Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer -Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galectin Therapeutics, Galmed Pharmaceuticals, Genfit, Gilead, Inventiva, Janssen, Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Merck, NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Siemens; consulting fees from Anylam/Regeneron, Amgen, Ar Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, CohBar, Eli Lilly, Galmed, Gilead, Glympse Bio, Inipharm, Intercept, Ionis, Janssen Inc., Madrigal, Metacrine, Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sagimet, 89Bio, Viking Therapeutics; advisory committee participation for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; co-founder of Liponexus, Inc. AJS is President of Sanyal Biotechnology; he reports stock options in Sanyal Bio, Exhalenz, Akarna, GenFit, Hemoshear, Durect, Indalo, Tiziana, Rivus; paid consultant to 89Bio, Albireo, Amgen, Ardelyx, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bird Rock, Bristol-Myers, Conatus, Covance, Echosens-Sandhill, ENYO, Genentech, General Electric, Genfit, Gilead, Hemoshear, HistoIndex, Inventiva, Janssen, Lilly, Madrigal, Mallinckrodt, Merck, NGM Bio, Nimbus, NorthSea, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owl, PathAI, Perspectum, Pfizer, Poxel, Prosciento, Regeneron, Rivus, Roche, Salix, Sanofi, Second Genome, Servier, Siemens, Takeda, Terns, Tiziana, Zydus; unpaid consultant to Immuron, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Galectin, Sequana, Fractyl; Durect, Indalo, Allergan, Chemomab, Affimune, Teva, BASF, AMRA, Perspectum, Biocellvia; advisory board member for Immuron; royalties from Elsevier and UptoDate; grant support from Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Salix, Novartis, Galectin, Bristol-Myers, Sequana; receipt of equipment from Echosens-Sandhill; ongoing research collaboration with Echosens-Sandhill, Owl, Second Genome, Siemens; his institution has received grant support from Conatus, Gilead, Mallinckrodt, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bristol-Myers, Merck, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Fractyl, Madrigal, Inventiva, Covance; his institution has received fees from AstraZeneca. MB reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. AT reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MN reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. RS reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. TG reports employment at and stock ownership in Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. AV reports employment at Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at the time of the study. VR reports consulting fees from Galmed, Genfit, Madrigal, NGM, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Theratechnologies, Terns; advisory committee participation for Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are common conditions with a rising burden. Yet there are significant management gaps between clinical guidelines and practice in patients with NAFLD and NASH. Further, there is no single global guiding strategy for the management of NAFLD and NASH. The American Gastroenterological Association, in collaboration with 7 professional associations, convened an international conference comprising 32 experts in gastroenterology, hepatology, endocrinology, and primary care providers from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Conference content was informed by the results of a national NASH Needs Assessment Survey. The participants reviewed and discussed published literature on global burden, screening, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management of individuals with NAFLD, including those with NASH. Participants identified promising approaches for clinical practice and prepared a comprehensive, unified strategy for primary care providers and relevant specialists encompassing the full spectrum of NAFLD/NASH care. They also identified specific high-yield targets for clinical research and called for a unified, international public health response to NAFLD and NASH., (© 2021 by the AGA Institute, the American Diabetes Association, Elsevier, and The Obesity Society.)

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global public health concern. Its natural history, the development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis, is highly variable, prone to endogenous (e.g., genetics, microbiota) and exogenous (e.g., nutrition, alcohol, physical activity) disease modifiers, and can fluctuate over time. The complexity of its pathophysiology is reflected by the multitude of pharmacological targets in development. NASH clinical trials have provided valuable insight that is applicable to future trial design. Endpoints for NASH have evolved over the past decade and will continue to be refined. Currently accepted endpoints for conditional approval include resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis and/or improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH by standardized evaluation of paired liver histology. In pediatric NASH, practical obstacles, pubertal hormonal changes, and stringent safety requirements mandate adaptations in trial design. In adult patients with NASH-related cirrhosis, clinical events (e.g. decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, transplantation, death) are more prevalent and thereby are viable primary endpoints. Consideration of the natural fluctuation of disease, the clinical implication of the chosen primary endpoint, and factors that may affect placebo response will facilitate an accurate determination of efficacy of emerging therapeutics for NASH. Conclusion: The June 2018 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver joint workshop on NAFLD endpoints summarized important findings from ongoing and completed trials, defined the scientific evidence supporting distinct endpoints, and provided guidance for future trial design., (© 2019 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the European Association for the Study of the Liver.)

Background: NGM282, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone FGF19, improves hepatic steatosis and fibrosis biomarkers in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). However, NGM282 increases serum cholesterol levels by inhibiting CYP7A1, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme in the conversion of cholesterol to bile acids. Herein, we investigate whether administration of a statin can manage the cholesterol increase seen in patients with NASH receiving treatment with NGM282., Methods: In this phase II, open-label, multicenter study, patients with biopsy-confirmed NASH were treated with subcutaneous NGM282 once daily for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks, rosuvastatin was added in stepwise, biweekly incremental doses to a maximum of 40 mg daily. Both drugs were continued until the end of treatment at week 12. We evaluated plasma lipids, lipoprotein particles and liver fat content., Results: In 66 patients who received NGM282 0.3 mg (n = 23), NGM282 1 mg (n = 21), or NGM282 3 mg (n = 22), circulating cholesterol increased from baseline at week 2. Initiation of rosuvastatin resulted in rapid decline in plasma levels of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. At week 12, reductions from baseline in total cholesterol levels of up to 18% (p <0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol of up to 28% (p <0.001), triglycerides of up to 34% (p <0.001) and an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol of up to 16% (p <0.001), with similar changes in lipoprotein particles, were observed in these patients. Robust decreases from baseline in 7alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (p <0.001) and liver fat content (p <0.001) were also observed. Rosuvastatin was safe and well-tolerated when co-administered with NGM282 in patients with NASH., Conclusions: In this multicenter study, NGM282-associated elevation of cholesterol was effectively managed with rosuvastatin. Co-administration of rosuvastatin with NGM282 may be a reasonable strategy to optimize the cardiovascular risk profile in patients with NASH., Lay Summary: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) represents a large and growing public health concern with no approved therapy. NGM282, an engineered analogue of the gut hormone FGF19, reduces liver fat, liver injury and inflammation in patients with NASH. However, NGM282 increases cholesterol levels. Here we show that co-administration of a statin can manage the cholesterol increase seen in patients with NASH receiving treatment with NGM282, producing a favorable overall lipid profile., (Copyright © 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)