Search

In advanced capitalist democracies, increased historical referencing has occurred within a context of changing regulatory modes from Fordism to post-Fordism. In post-Soviet Russia, historical referencing differs because of the confluence of three transitions: Fordism to pos(Fordism, socialism to capitalism, and Soviet Russia to post-Soviet Russia. This article documents the use of history and culture by the Russian urban government in Yaroslavl' as a means of achieving stability. The author argues that the local government used historical referencing to attract the gaze of the international tourist and investor as well as (he gaze of (he Russian public. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A theoretical analysis of contemporary institutional changes in the developed economies is attempted in order to characterize what a post fordist growth regime could be. One starts to recall some stylized facts about the present growth regime, i.e. about the contemporary dynamics of productivity on one side and of demand formation on the other side. We then discuss the main theoretical tools provided by the Regulation theory to analyse the institutional nexus which frames the growth regimes. The analytical framework of institutional change that we derive insist on the predominance at each period of one of the five structural forms that are distinguished by the Regulation School. As did the dynamics of institutional changes with the wage labor relationships in the previous period, today's evolutions of the forms of competition (broadly taken) condition all institutional changes. This gives us a general grid to define the features of a post Fordist regime. Still differences in history and structures leave room for sizeable differentiation in the national trajectories of the developed economies, all the more so that competition between nation States much prevent them to launch the structural policies that would be relevant with the new regime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using participant observation, this article explores the social forces giving rise to workers' culture in a Japanese automobile assembly plant. Most theories share the problematic assumption that workers' culture is homogeneous, obscuring the emergence of, and interplay between, subcultures. Subcultures encourage male and female workers to see themselves in opposition to the other and to articulate narrowly constructed gender subjectivities that conform to factory discipline in a changing post-Fordist work place. The analysis suggests the need to examine both sides of the class and gender divide in order to understand fully the labour process and the formation of organisational culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article examines the claims that we are living in a new global, post-Fordist era, The claims of both globalization and post-Fordism are examined, as well as some of the implications for development. Both theses are questioned, and in particular it is argued that in some respects the two arguments contradict rather than complement each other. An alternative approach is put forward, focusing on the contemporary context for development in the global economy, critically using the notion of global commodity chains. It is argued that we are currently witnessing a variety of strategies of capital accumulation in the world economy, and insofar as generalizations can be made, we have witnessed the end of the Third World as a homogeneous block. While some formerly peripheral countries are now a constituent part of the world economy, others are marginal to its needs. These countries are not so much exploited as simply left out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents review of a symposium that focuses on changing divisions of knowledge and labor. Pat Ainley is among those who believe that we live in a era of fundamental change. In the debates about post-industrialism, post-Fordism, post-modernism and so on he is on the side arguing that the coming social order will differ in important ways from the society of the recent past. Needless to say, Ainly has a particular vision of the future. No-one could agree with all the "post" scenarios that are now on offer. Yet the fact that some must be wrong does not mean that none can be correct. Ainly seeks to convince that the future must be different. He is not in the camp that insists that beneath the surface very little is changing and that current trends are mostly extensions of developments with long histories. Ainly's core argument is that the nature of skill and the character of the class structure are being revamped. The changes that are in process are said to be more fundamental than an increase in the proportion of traditionally skilled or middle class occupations or the substitution of new skills for old. The catalyst of the fundamental changes is said to be new technology which, Ainly claims, is changing what it means to be skilled, blurting divisions between manual and mental labor, and between skilled and other occupations. He argues that older class divisions are being overwhelmed faster than many sociologists seem to realize.

A list of books for review are presented. It includes "Rethinking the Political Economy of Punishment: Perspectives on Post-Fordism and Penal Politics," by A. De Giorgio, "City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles," new edition, by M. Davis and "Revolution in the Air: Sixties Radicals Turn to Lenin, Mao and Che," new edition, by M. Elbaum.

Se presenta una introducción en la que el autor comenta sobre los artículos en este número, incluyendo uno sobre la enfermería en América Latina, uno sobre el mercado de trabajo postfordista y uno sobre la masculinidad.

An essay is presented on an analysis of the autonomist theory of post-Fordism which says that capitalism is beyond quantification. Topics discussed include the analysis being a correction of philosopher Karl Marx's quantitative theory of value, the book "Empire" by post-Marxist philosophers Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt, and the concept of immaterial labor eliding the distinction in Marx's analysis between specialized time thus leading to mischaracterization of contemporary capitalism.

The author discuses the reflection of emotions and affect in the human geography as stated by S. Pile. He says that Pile relates affect to the eurocentrism of mobilised geographical work that suggests people as product of particular time, world, and place. He adds that the work on affect is often referenced to the influences of Spinoza's philosophy. He mentions the profound connections between intellectual trends of affect and contemporary socio-spatial transformations related to post-Fordist.