Search

Introduction : In Italy, medical simulation is undergoing a phase of intense diffusion, establishing a more decisive and uniform role in medical education. Educators receive many opportunities to train in simulation education, but these provide little room for personal growth and collaboration. This could have a negative impact on education quality and the standardization of processes. Thus, we found a gap in new information technology use, specifically in the informal diffusion of medical simulation content knowledge. Using a blog platform, we identified a space in which people can disseminate information, share their experiences, criticisms, and perspectives. Approach : From March 2016 to November 2019, we implemented a novel pilot project, creating the first Italian blog on simulations, dedicated to simulation educators. It contained the following main sections: communication, debriefing, simulation experiences, instructions for use, journal club, and psychology. Findings : Multidisciplinary personnel contributed to the blog's content. With over 70 posts, the blog accumulated 25,615 pageviews and 9,056 sessions, without promotional, monetary support or diffusion efforts. The average visitor session was 2.17 minutes long and the average pages viewed in a session was 2.83. Additionally, 30.5% of the users were returning visitors and 58.67% found the website through Google. Insights : Despite the blog's niche subject, the results were encouraging. The materials were not only meant for personal viewing, but also as a source for announcing public events (meetings and workshops). The project provided educators with an easy tool for continuous education. We believe that it enabled and organized the informal sharing of educational simulation content. As such, it also offered significant insights into formal program consolidation and the standardization of simulation instruction, while we wait for further local scientific literature production. For future developments, we believe that collaborations with other stakeholders, scientific societies, and ethical sponsorship could foster this project's continuation.

In Italy, emergency department (ED) triage is a complex and delicate interface in which different emergency healthcare providers interact: physicians, nurses, and pre-hospital rescuers. There are significant differences in the communication, training, and abilities of these providers. Communication failures during the pre-hospital/hospital interface have been identified as a major preventable cause of patient harm. We previously evaluated handover in simulated scenarios, and developed specialized handover training for pre-hospital emergency rescuers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate communication during the clinical handover between pre-hospital to ED staff, using realistic scenarios. A nurse, trained through high-fidelity simulation handover scenarios, used our adapted ISBAR tool to evaluate inter-professional communication at triage. We evaluated and statistically analyzed 240 handovers performed by pre-hospital rescuers over nine observing shifts. On the whole, the data analysis highlights a lack of communication standards, a lack of formal transfer of responsibility of patient care, and a marked inconsistency in information communicated by every professional group examined. Only those rescuers who were previously trained in handover performed 100% of the ISBAR tool items. The information most often communicated was the reason for the call, (85%) and the information least often communicated was the complete ABCDE patient survey (1%). Currently, ED personnel receive poor verbal information from pre-hospital providers. The general habit of pre-hospital providers is to give different written reports to the triage nurses without a true shared transfer of responsibility. This lack of standardization in communication presumably has an adverse impact upon patient care.