Search

Purpose: Assessment of in vitro efficacy of three different nonsurgical implant surface decontamination methods in three peri-implant bone defect simulation models., Materials and Methods: A total of 180 implants were allocated to differently angulated (30, 60, and 90 degrees) peri-implant bone defect resin models, each covered by a mucosa mask. All implants were stained with indelible red color and assigned to one of the three defect models. In each simulated bone defect group, 20 implants were decontaminated for 2 minutes with a curette (CUR), sonic scaler (SOSC), or air-powder abrasion device (APA) with glycine powder. Photos were taken from both sides of each implant to measure the percentage of uncleaned implant surface area. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess the implant surface for morphologic damage., Results: Among the three defect angulations, a significantly different cleaning efficacy (P < .001) for each treatment method was found (30 degrees: CUR [67.33%], SOSC [62.70%], APA [39.33%]; 60 degrees: CUR [61.59%], SOSC [54.31%], APA [23.91%]; 90 degrees: CUR [66.82%], SOSC [55.77%], APA [28.03%]). SEM did not show any considerable surface damage after APA treatment in comparison with after CUR or SOSC., Conclusion: Air-powder abrasion proved to be the most efficient nonsurgical treatment device for each type of defect in this in vitro model with the least noticeable surface change. No decontamination method resulted in complete cleaning of the color remnants on the implant surface.

As implant placement increases within all dental specialties, it is expected that the number of suboptimal results will increase, as well. The goal of this article is to provide clinicians with an outline of the management of periimplantitis cases, ranging from simple to complex. It will review signs and symptoms, diagnosis, case selection, and armamentarium. In addition, this chapter will discuss basic techniques which can be utilized at various stages to salvage the compromised implant., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr M. Miloro is a consultant for Axogen. The other authors have nothing to disclose., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is defined as bone loss around an osseointegrated implant apex that usually appears within the first few months of its placement. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relationships between RPI and demographic factors, local bone and intraoral factors, and implant and surgery-related factors., Method and Materials: A retrospective study was conducted in 116 patients with a total of 369 implants placed between January and June 2019. The associations between RPI and the following data were evaluated: location of the recipient site, bone quality, reason for previous tooth loss, condition of adjacent teeth, marginal bone loss, immediate or late placement of implants, implant brand and size, activation of lesions, and treatment modality. , Results: Among the 14 (3.8%) implants that showed RPI, 10 (5.8%) were in the maxilla and four (?2.0%) were in the mandible, which were detected before prosthetic loading. There was no significant difference in terms of RPI between the arches. Of the 14 RPI implants, four (28.?6%) were placed into a previously periapical lesion site, three (21.4%) had endodontically treated adjacent teeth, two (14.3%) were immediately placed following extraction, three (?21.4%) revealed marginal bone loss, and one (7.1%) was lost at the abutment connection. Eight RPI implants healed spontaneously, while the remaining six were subjected to treatment (P = .05). , Conclusion: Local bone and intraoral factors, particularly the reason for tooth loss at the recipient site and the condition of the adjacent teeth, had stronger effects on RPI than other factors. (Quintessence Int 2021;52:112-121; doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a45264).

Implant dentistry has emerged as a first line of treatment to replace missing teeth for both the edentulous and partially dentate patients. Implant dentistry is accompanied by the onset of peri-implantitis (PIM). PIM is characterized by the inflammatory destruction of the implant-supporting tissues, because of biofilm formation on the implant surface. A history of periodontitis, poor oral hygiene, and smoking are considered as risk factors for PIM. Occasionally PIM is associated with iatrogenic factors, that, only recently, have been acknowledged as direct cause of PIM, i.e.: non-parallel adjacent implants or the presence of a gap, between fixture and prosthetic components. The use both of traditional protocols of nonsurgical periodontal therapy and the laser seems to be an effective alternative treatment modality for PMI. By the application of laser-assisted non-surgical peri-implant therapy the periodontal pocket depth was reduced. The present article illustrates the nonsurgical management of one case, where failure to remove residual cement, from an implant-supported dental prosthesis, seemed to cause PMI., (Copyright 2020 Biolife Sas. www.biolifesas.org.)

Nowadays, dental implants are a prominent therapeutic approach among dentists for replacing missing teeth. Failure in dental implants is a severe challenge recently. The factors which lead to dental implant failure are known. These factors can be categorized into different groups. In this article, we discussed the immunological aspects of implant failure as one of these groups. Cytokines and immune cells have extensive and various functions in peri-implantitis. The equilibrium between pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines and cells, which involve in this orchestra, has a crucial role in implant prognosis. In conclusion, immune cells, especially macrophages and dendritic cells, almost increased in the patients with implant failure. Also, proinflammatory cytokines were proposed as diagnostic factors according to their higher levels in dental implant rejection., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Milad Baseri et al.)

Aim: The aim of this prospective cohort study was to assess the effect of a pocket irrigator/evacuator device (IED) in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis., Material and Methods: In total 24 patients having 38 implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis were included in this study. Peri-implant pockets were irrigated six times in three consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was bleeding on probing (BoP). Secondary outcome parameters included plaque index (Pl), suppuration on probing (SoP), probing pocket depth (PPD), marginal bone loss (MBL), presence and numbers of periodontal pathogens. Parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months after the last treatment. Treatment pain perception was scored using the visual analog scale (VAS) after the first and last treatment., Results: At 3 months, IED treatment revealed significant reduction of peri-implant BoP (71% [±20] vs 57% [±28] [P = .014]) and peri-implant plaque scores (10 [±14] to 5 [±9] [P = .039] [T0 vs T3 respectively]). Significant reduction in mean peri-implant PPD from 4.92 mm (SD ± 1.28) to 4.66 mm (SD ± 1.35) (P = .041) was observed. In addition, a reduction in VAS pain score between the first and the last (6th) treatment was found (P = .039). No reduction in SoP (P = .088) was found. No changes in mean periodontal full mouth plaque, BOP, SOP and PPD levels, MBL and microbiological outcomes were found., Conclusion: Beneficial clinical effects in terms of BoP, PPD and PI were found at 3 months after IED treatment. However, the IED does not seem to effectively treat peri-implantitis in terms of disease resolution., (© 2020 The Authors. International Journal of Dental Hygiene published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To compare the efficacy of two different therapies (amino acid glycine abrasive powder and a desiccant material) and their combination in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis., Materials and Methods: This was an examiner-blind randomized clinical trial, with 2-factorial design with a follow-up of 6 months. The combination of the two factors resulted in four interventions: (a) non-surgical debridement alone (C); (b) non-surgical debridement and a desiccant material (H); (c) non-surgical debridement and glycine powder (G); and (d) non-surgical debridement, desiccant material and glycine powder (HG)., Results: Sixty-four patients with peri-implantitis were randomized, 16 for each intervention. After six months, two implants failed in the G intervention. Mean pocket depth reduction was higher in patients treated with the desiccant material (estimated difference: 0.5 mm; 95% CI from 0.1 to 0.9 mm, p = .0229) while there was no difference in the patients treated with glycine powder (estimated difference: 0.1 mm; 95% CI from -0.3 to 0.5 mm, p = .7333). VAS for pain during intervention and VAS for pain after one week were higher for patients treated with glycine powder (p = .0056 and p = .0339, respectively). The success criteria and other variables did not reveal differences between interventions., Conclusions: In this 6-month follow-up study, pocket reduction was more pronounced in patients using the desiccant material. Pain was higher in patients using glycine. All the interventions resulted in low success rate., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Peri-implantitis treatment is a very challenging topic to discuss. What is certain is that preventive/supportive therapy plays a key-role in peri-implant tissues' health maintenance and non-surgical implant surface mechanical debridement remains one of the solid pillars in the therapeutic pathway. In this perspective, many surface decontaminating methods have been proposed and tested to remove hard and soft bacterial deposits. The aim of this study was to compare four different commonly used non-surgical implant debridement methods in terms of cleaning potential in vitro, using a peri-implant pocket-simulating model., Methods: Sixty-four dental implants were ink-stained and placed into a simulated peri-implant pocket. Samples were then divided into four groups and treated with different debridement methods: stainless-steel ultrasonic tip (PS), peek-coated ultrasonic tip (PI), sub-gingival air-polishing with erythritol powder (EHX) and sub-gingival air-polishing with glycine powder (GLY). For each treatment group, half of the samples were treated for 5 seconds and the other half for 45 seconds. High-resolution images were taken using a digital microscope and later analyzed with a light processing software for measuring the cleaned area percentage (ink-free). Two different images were captured for every sample: a first image with the implant positioned perpendicular to the microscope lenses (90°) and a second one with the implant placed with a 45° vertical angulation, with the smooth neck towards the ground. Percentage of removed ink was statistically modelled using a generalized linear mixed model with the implant as a random (clustering) factor., Results: A paired comparison between all treatments in terms of debridement potential (cleaned area percentage) was performed. In 5s and with 90° sample angulation EHX/PS comparison showed an odds ratio of 2.75 (P<0.001), PI/EHX an OR of 0.20 (P<0.001), GLY/PS an OR of 2.90 (P<0.001), PI/GLY an OR of 0.19 (P<0.001) and PI/PS an OR of 0.56 (P=0.105). With the same sample angulation and 45s treatment time, the OR was 6.97 (P<0.001) for EHX/PS comparison, 0.14 (P<0.001) for PI/EHX comparison, 4.99 (P<0.001) for GLY/PS, 0.19 (P<0.001) for PI/GLY and 0.95 for PI/PS (P =0.989). With 5s of treatment time and 45° sample angulation, EHX/PS comparison shows a 3.19 odds ratio (P<0.001), PI/EHX a 0.14 odds ratio (P<0.001), GLY/PS a 3.06 odds ratio (P<0.001), PI/GLY a 0.15 odds ratio (P<0.001) and PI/PS a 0.46 odds ratio (P=0.017). With the same sample angulation but 45s treatment time, EHX/PS comparison produced an odds ratio of 4.90 (P<0.001), PI/EHX an OR of 0.20 (P<0.001), GLY/PS an OR of 8.74 (P<0.001), PI/GLY an OR of 0.11 (P<0.001) and PI/PS an OR 0.96 of (P =0.996)., Conclusions: Among the four treatments considered, air-polishing therapy represents the best one in terms of ink removal from the implant surface. Furthermore, increasing the treatment time to 45 seconds, air-polishing resulted considerably more efficient.

Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of probiotics on peri-implant diseases., Materials and Methods: PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, Literature in the Health Sciences in Latin America and the Caribbean (LILACS) and Science Direct were searched until September 2019. Three authors independently carried out this search, using the following search algorithm to explore databases using Boolean operators ("peri-implant diseases" OR "dental implants") AND ("probiotics" OR "lactobacillus"). Randomized clinical trials were included. No limits were applied to the year and articles were restricted to those in the English, Spanish and Portuguese languages. Review articles, reports of clinical cases and works without mention of the topic were excluded., Results: Five randomized clinical trials were analyzed in the final review process. For the primary outcomes - Periodontal probing depth (PPD) and bleeding on probing (BOP); and for the secondary outcames - plaque index, gingival index, gingival crevicular fluid and microbiological tests - no significant clinical effects of probiotics were observed., Conclusion: Probiotics could be used during the treatment of peri-implant diseases. However, the most appropriate form of probiotic administration or the effectiveness of this approach are still unclear. There is currently insufficient evidence to demonstrate the benefits of the use of probiotics as an adjunctive therapy in patients with peri-implant diseases., Competing Interests: None of the authors of this review declares a conflict of interest or obtained any kind of financing or support from any company related to the production of probiotics. This investigation did not receive any private financial support, (Copyright© by the International Academy of Periodontology.)

The long-term success of peri-implantitis treatments is generally insufficient. Attacking the bacteria on the titanium implant surface using electrochemical polarization could be an alternative approach. In this study an E. coli biofilm in phosphate buffered saline was treated with low current densities (0.25 to 2 mA/cm 2 ) using anodic, cathodic, or combined polarization regimes, either alone or with the antiseptic chlorhexidine. The antibacterial effect was assessed using LIVE/DEAD® staining and through quantification of viable bacteria, sample surfaces were characterized pre- and post-treatment with electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. All polarization treatments had an antibacterial effect that increased with current density, with at least 1 mA/cm 2 necessary to reduce colony forming units by four orders of magnitude. Cathodic treatment was slightly superior to anodic treatment, and there was no difference between alternating polarization and single-type polarization. Neither treatment resulted in a significant detachment of bacteria, but combination with chlorhexidine improved the antibacterial effect synergistically. The use of chloride containing electrolytes is not recommended in this context. The low current densities used here were not sufficient to generate adequate bactericidal chlorine reactive species, but first signs of pitting corrosion were already detected for anodic polarization at 1 mA/cm 2 ., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This study investigated the bactericidal effect, the underlying mechanisms of treatment, and recovery of biocompatibility of the infected titanium surface using a combination treatment of silver ion application and ultraviolet-A (UV-A) light irradiation. Streptococcus mutans and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans were used in suspension and as a biofilm on a titanium surface to test for the bactericidal effect. The bactericidal effect of the combination treatment was significantly higher than that of silver ion application or UV-A light irradiation alone. The bactericidal effect of the combination treatment was attributable to hydroxyl radicals, which generated from the bacterial cell wall and whose yield increased with the silver concentration. To assess the biocompatibility, proliferation and calcification of MC3T3E1 cells were evaluated on the treated titanium surface. The treated titanium screws were implanted into rat tibias and the removal torques were measured 28 days post-surgery. The titanium surface that underwent the combination treatment exhibited recovery of biocompatibility by allowing cellular proliferation or calcification at levels observed in the non-infected titanium surfaces. The removal torque 28 days after surgery was also comparable to the control values. This approach is a novel treatment option for peri-implantitis.

The intent of this study was to provide a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes of 222 consecutive patients with 437 implants diagnosed with peri-implantitis and treated with the LAPIP protocol. All patients treated with LAPIP therapy at this practice were included. The primary outcome variable studied was probing depth (PD), and secondary variables were erythema, bleeding on probing, and suppuration. The significance of reductions in PD and clinical signs was assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Complete data for both baseline and follow-up visits were available for 116 patients with a total of 224 treated implants. The rate of successful treatments-defined as follow-up PD ≤ 4.0 mm and elimination of clinical signs-was 90%. The reduction in PD from 5.4 mm at baseline to 3.4 mm at a median of 7.6 months was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). The reduction in the frequency of clinical signs was also statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). Among 138 patients who had follow-up visits but not necessarily complete PD data, 15 implants were recorded as failed and 249 were recorded as intact at the median longest follow-up time of 13.1 months, resulting in a survival rate of 94%. In this single clinical practice, use of the minimally invasive LAPIP protocol for the treatment of peri-implantitis provided effective and predictable clinical outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials are indicated., Competing Interests: Dr Harris is chief science advisor for Millennium Dental Technologies, Cerritos, California, and director of Bio-Medical Consultants & Associates, Paradise, California.

Implant therapy, a modern treatment option for completely and partially edentulous patients. However, numerous clinical studies indicate a sufficiently large number (9-20%) of the failure rate of implants. The achievement of osseointegration depends on many factors, such as a suitable host, alteration in bone metabolism, hormone balance, smoking habits, and local conditions (quantity and quality of bone, biocompatible materials, traumatic surgical technique, occlusal conditions, quality of dental implants, and corrosion of the metal of implants, thoroughness of surgery and healing time). As can be seen from the review data, achievements in the field of dental implantation are based on a deep understanding of the fundamental cellular processes of regeneration and restoration of periodontal tissues, maintaining optimal local conditions that contribute to accelerating the regeneration process. A thorough knowledge of the cellular mechanisms of wound healing and the clinical consequences of modern periodontal treatments should provide further improvement or the development of new treatment strategies for the restoration and regeneration of soft tissues and dental implants. Various immuno-inflammatory mediators and bone-related molecules can be considered potential biomarkers that will be used for monitoring peri-implant health and disease. Their timely detection and systematic maintenance therapy may have a crucial impact on decreasing the occurrence of peri-implant lesions. Importantly, individual genetic data might contribute to therapeutic planning and prognosis, make its coordination depending on observed genotype. Supplementary evidence concerning the molecular pathophysiology of peri-implantitis may, in the future, benefit the treatment of dental implants, development of preventive approaches to avoid peri-implant tissue breakdown.

The surgical treatment of peri-implantitis is currently based on the removal of biofilms from the implant surface by primary means of mechanical and physical treatments. However, such approaches often determine some alterations of the implant surface with detrimental effects on re-osseointegration. This study aims to evaluate the effects of four different mechanical and physical treatments on titanium samples with moderately rough surface. Air powder abrasion (AP) with glycine powder, a titanium brush (TB) and a diode laser at 3 W (L3) and 4 W (L4) were tested. Surface morphology, roughness and chemical composition were then assessed by scanning electron microscope (SEM), white light interferometer and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), respectively. The microscopic analysis revealed significant alterations in surface morphology on TB samples, while AP and L3 had only a minor or null impact. L4 samples revealed signs of overheating due to the excessive power. Nevertheless, the overall roughness of the samples was not significantly altered in terms of roughness parameters. Similarly, surface chemical composition was not significantly affected by the treatments. Among the treatments tested in this study, air powder abrasion with glycine powder and 3 W diode laser had the lowest impact on surface physicochemical properties.

Background and Objectives: Peri-implantitis remains a challenge for dental implant therapy, and the prognosis of non-surgical therapy for peri-implantitis is unsatisfactory. In order to reveal the impact of non-surgical mechanical debridement therapy on microbial communities, we investigated the subgingival microbial communities of healthy implants and implants with peri-implantitis, both before and after the therapy., Material and Methods: Subgingival plaques were collected from patients with healthy dental implants (HC; n = 10) and from patients with peri-implantitis (n = 13) before and after non-surgical mechanical debridement therapy. The treatment was conducted using curettes for submucosal debridement followed by irrigation with 0.2% (w/v) chlorhexidine, with re-examination 1 month later. 16S rRNA pyrosequencing was used to analyze the subgingival microbiome, and co-occurrence networks were adopted to explore the interactions between pathogens in the microbial communities., Results: A total of 506 955 high-quality reads were generated, and 2222 operational taxonomic units were finally detected using a 97% similarity cutoff, with a mean of 249 ± 69 per sample. The peri-implantitis sites harbored similar microbial communities before and after the treatment, as demonstrated by the microbial diversity, relative abundance, and prevalence of bacteria. Most importantly, the microbial community structures were stable before and after non-surgical therapy based on the microbial diversity and bacterial composition, as well as the interactions between key pathogens, including Enterobacteriaceae, Selenomonas sputigena, Parvimonas, Eubacterium infirmum, Campylobacter gracilis, Tannerella forsythia, and Fusobacterium, which were measured using a co-occurrence network analysis. Periodontal pathogens were also detected in subgingival plaque after the treatment. Distinct microbial communities were found between the healthy and peri-implantitis sites., Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that non-surgical mechanical debridement therapy did not significantly affect the subgingival microbial communities in peri-implantitis, and the stable microbial networks created via interactions among pathogens may be responsible for the poor prognosis of peri-implantitis treatment., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease of hard and soft tissues around osseointegrated implants, followed by a progressive damage of alveolar bone. Oral microorganisms can adhere to all types of surfaces by the production of multiple adhesive factors. Inherent properties of materials will influence not only the number of microorganisms, but also their profile and adhesion force onto the material surface. In this perspective, strategies to reduce the adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms on dental implants and their components should be investigated in modern rehabilitation concepts in implant dentistry. To date, several metallic nanoparticle films have been developed to reduce the growth of pathogenic bacteria. However, the main drawback in these approaches is the potential toxicity and accumulative effect of the metals over time. In view of biological issues and in attempt to prevent and/or treat peri-implantitis, biomaterials as carriers of antimicrobial substances have attracted special attention for application as coatings on dental implant devices. This review will focus on biomaterial-based possibilities to prevent and/or treat peri-implantitis by describing concepts and dental implant components suitable for engagement in preventing and treating this disease. Additionally, we raise important criteria referring to the geometric parameters of dental implants and their components, which can directly affect peri-implant tissue conditions. Finally, we overview currently available biomaterial systems that can be used in the field of oral implantology., (© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Periodontal Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of two protocols in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) among cigarette smokers., Materials and Methods: Three groups were randomized into (i) single session of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) with mechanical debridement (MD) (Group-A), (ii) systemic AB with MD (Group-B), and (iii) MD alone (Group-C). Clinical peri-implant parameters including plaque scores (PS), bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing depth (PD) were measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Microbiological parameters included the assessment of percentage level of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus at baseline and 12 weeks. All parameters were analyzed using Friedman test and multiple comparisons performed using Bonferroni tests. P-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: At 6 weeks of follow-up, there was a statistically significant reduction in PS (p < 0.001), BOP (p < 0.01), and PD (p < 0.05) among patients in groups A and B on intragroup comparison. At 12 weeks of follow-up, there was a further significant reduction in PS (p < 0.001) and BOP (p < 0.01) among patients in groups A and B on intragroup comparison but this reduction was comparable with 6-week follow-up. On inter-group comparison, only Group-A showed statistically significant reduction in BOP compared to Group-B and C at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). The levels of both P. aeruginosa and S. aureus in Group-A and Group-B showed statistically significant reductions at 12 weeks compared with baseline (p < 0.01). On inter-group comparison, Group-A and B showed no significant differences at follow-up (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: This short term clinical study suggests that aPDT as an adjunct to MD is as efficacious as adjunctive antibiotic therapy. However, additional benefits in the reduction of bleeding scores were observed for aPDT in peri-implant inflammation among cigarette smokers., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Peri-implantitis is becoming a frequent complication observed around dental implants. An endodontic infection of a nearby tooth or an immediate implant placement in an inflamed bone socket from failing endodontic therapy has been associated with retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI), a condition that presents with radiographic lucency at the "apex" of an implant. However, current classification schemes do not capture endodontic lesions that may manifest as coronal or intrabony lesions associated with dental implants. As a result, such cases may be mistreated. Here we present for the first time 2 cases in which peri-implant bone loss occurred in the coronal half of the implant adjacent to a tooth with an endodontic-periodontic lesion and was resolved via endodontic therapy or tooth extraction as indicated. This proof of concept report aimed to introduce endodontic peri-implant ("endo-implant") defects and increase vigilance, which may help prevent overtreatment or mistreatment of such cases., (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants treated by means of non-surgical debridement with systemic antibiotic therapy., Materials and Methods: A prospective case series study evaluating the 12-month clinical and radiographic outcomes of peri-implantitis lesions treated with ultrasonic scaler debridement, a glycine air abrasive, and metronidazole followed by supportive maintenance. Clinical and radiographic variables and success criteria were defined a priori., Results: Overall, 21 patients were included. One implant failed during the study period (implant survival rate 95.24%). Substantial changes occurred at 12 months in all the clinical and radiographic variables, reaching strong statistical significance in the majority of them. According to the success criteria applied, 40.90% of the peri-implantitis were arrested and resolved, while 59.1% presented with at least one probed site with bleeding on probing (BoP). Moreover, 95.45% exhibited peri-implant pocket depth (PPD) < 5 mm at the end of the study. None of the implants presented with progressive bone loss., Conclusion: Non-surgical therapy of peri-implantitis is effective to arrest progressive bone loss, reduce PPD and suppuration, and achieve radiographic bone fill in the majority of cases. Nevertheless, it failed to be completely efficacious in the achievement of successful therapeutic outcomes as BoP remained frequently present., Clinical Relevance: Non-surgical therapy achieved significant clinical and radiological improvements.

Background: Stem cells are undifferentiated cells with multilineage differentiation potential. They can be collected from bone marrow, fat, amniotic fluid, and teeth. Stem cell-based therapies have been widely used to treat multiple diseases, such as cardiac disease, and hematological disorders. The cells may also be beneficial for controlling the disease course and promoting tissue regeneration in oral and maxillofacial diseases. Oral-derived gingival mesenchymal stem cells are easy to access and the donor sites heal rapidly without a scar. Such characteristics demonstrate the beneficial role of GMSCs in oral and maxillofacial diseases., Objective: We summarize the features of GMSCs, including their self-renewal, multipotent differentiation, immunomodulation, and anti-inflammation properties. We also discuss their applications in oral and maxillofacial disease treatment and tissue regeneration., Conclusion: GMSCs are easily harvestable adult stem cells with outstanding proliferation, differentiation, and immunomodulation characteristics. A growing body of evidence indicates that GMSCs have strong potential use in accelerating wound healing and promoting the regeneration of bone defects, periodontium, oral neoplasms, salivary glands, peri-implantitis, and nerves. Moreover, alginate, polylactic acid and polycaprolactone can be used as biodegradable scaffolds for GMSC encapsulation. Various growth factors can be applied to the corresponding scaffolds to obtain the desired GMSC differentiation and phenotypes. Three-dimensional spheroid culture systems could optimize GMSC properties and improve the performance of the cells in tissue engineering. The immunomodulatory property of GMSCs in controlling oral and maxillofacial inflammation needs further research., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Biologic complications around dental implants may be categorized into peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis is defined as reversible inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa without any apparent bone destruction. Peri-implantitis refers to inflammatory process that resulted in destruction of alveolar bone and attachment. Potential etiologic and contributing factors to both diseases are discussed in this review. By targeting and eliminating the etiologic factors nonsurgically as well as surgically, dental implants presenting with peri-implant diseases may be rescued, and then maintained with proper long-term peri-implant supportive therapy. Furthermore, clinical cases and their management are presented to demonstrate the available treatment options. Implant therapy should be carefully planned and executed with consideration of potential etiologic and contributing factors to developing biologic complications. During the initial consideration, patients should be informed of the potential biologic complications in dental implant therapy. Clinicians should monitor implants for any development or recurrence of peri-implant disease to ensure timely therapeutic intervention.

The peri-implantitis, one of the complications of dental implant surgery, has been bothered clinicians and researchers experts and scholars. Recently, laser, as an adjuvant therapy, has been applied to the treatment of peri-implantitis and achieved satisfactory results. The present review summarized the safety application of laser treatment for peri-implantitis.

Objective: The aim was to assess the efficacy of mechanical debridement (MD) with and without adjunct antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) in the treatment of peri-implantitis among cigarette-smokers and waterpipe-users., Materials and Methods: Patients diagnosed with peri-implantitis were included. Demographic data was collected using a questionnaire. Individuals in the test- and control-groups underwent MD with adjunct aPDT and MD alone, respectively. Peri-implant clinical (plaque-index [PI], bleeding on probing [BOP] and probing depth [PD]) and radiographic (crestal bone loss [CBL]) inflammatory parameters were measured at baseline and at 6- and 12-months follow-up. Sample-size estimation was performed, and statistical analysis was done. P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant., Results: Ninety-eight male patients with peri-implantitis (34 cigarette-smokers, 32 waterpipe-users and 32 never-smokers) were included. At baseline, there was no difference in the peri-implant PI, PD and CBL in all groups; and BOP levels were significantly high among never-smokers (n = 16) (P < 0.01) than cigarette-smokers (n = 17) and waterpipe-users (n = 16). There was no difference in PI, BOP, PD and CBL among cigarette-smokers (n = 17) and waterpipe-users (n = 16) that underwent MD alone at 3- and 6-months' follow-up compared with baseline. Compared with baseline, PI (P < 0.05) and PD (P < 0.05) were significantly lower among cigarette-smokers (n = 17) and waterpipe-users (n = 16) that underwent MD + aPDT at 3-months' follow-up. At 6-months' follow-up, PI, BOP and PD were significantly lower in never-smokers (n = 16) than their respective baseline and 3-months' follow up outcomes., Conclusion: MD with adjunct aPDT is effective for the treatment of peri-implantitis. Routine oral hygiene maintenance plays a role in the overall success of MD with or without aPDT in patients with peri-implantitis., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this illustrated review is to present the new strategies and developments to treatment and diagnosis of periimplant diseases. Periimplant disease is a subject of great concern for modern dentistry. The numbers of implant exhibiting biological complications grows as implant dentistry expands thought-out the world. Diagnosis and treatment of those diseases are still controversial and difficult. We present novel treatment for infection control and biological rationale of additional use of guided bone regeneration, with an illustrative explanation of the treatments presented with two cases.

Background and Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the methodological quality and risk of bias in systematic reviews (SRs) on the effectiveness of peri-implantitis treatments., Material and Methods: We searched four electronic databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE. Previous SRs focusing on peri-implantitis treatment published between 2010 and 2017 were identified. After literature screening, eligible SRs were qualitatively assessed using two validated instruments: Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2) and Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews (ROBIS). The characteristics and findings of SRs are also reported., Results: A total of 23 SRs formed the basis of this study. Of the 23, six included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. Overall, the AMSTAR2 assessment revealed three studies with high and six studies with low methodological quality, and all the other SRs were judged as having critically low methodological quality. ROBIS revealed only one Cochrane review with a low risk of bias and the others with a high risk of bias. In particular, the assessment of non-randomized studies (NRSIs), appropriateness of ROB assessment, and meta-analysis did not satisfy the criteria in AMSTAR2 assessment. Furthermore, there were a few SRs that interpreted and discussed the results of risk of bias (ROB) and heterogeneity assessment, together with the impact of treatment., Conclusions: Due to the lack of head-to-head comparisons conducted in RCTs, review authors need to use other sources of evidence, such as clinical control trials (CCTs), cohort studies (CS), clinical research (CR), and animal studies. The end result is the presentation of low-quality evidence, with high ROB. Several SRs conducted network meta-analysis as an alternative to head-to-head conventional meta-analysis of RCTs. We suggest that the best methods to generate, access, and assess evidence in situations where RCT evidence is lacking should be discussed on an urgent basis., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Periodontal disease is a chronic inflammatory condition that affects supporting tissues around teeth, resulting in periodontal tissue breakdown. If left untreated, periodontal disease could have serious consequences; this condition is in fact considered as the primary cause of tooth loss. Being highly prevalent among adults, periodontal disease treatment is receiving increased attention from researchers and clinicians. When this condition occurs around dental implants, the disease is termed peri-implantitis. Periodontal regeneration aims at restoring the destroyed attachment apparatus, in order to improve tooth stability and thus reduce disease progression and subsequent periodontal tissue breakdown. Although many biomaterials have been developed to promote periodontal regeneration, they still have their own set of disadvantages. As a result, regenerative medicine has been employed in the periodontal field, not only to overcome the drawbacks of the conventional biomaterials but also to ensure more predictable regenerative outcomes with minimal complications. Regenerative medicine is considered a part of the research field called tissue engineering/regenerative medicine (TE/RM), a translational field combining cell therapy, biomaterial, biomedical engineering and genetics all with the aim to replace and restore tissues or organs to their normal function using in vitro models for in vivo regeneration. In a tissue, cells are responding to different micro-environmental cues and signaling molecules, these biological factors influence cell differentiation, migration and cell responses. A central part of TE/RM therapy is introducing drugs, genetic materials or proteins to induce specific cellular responses in the cells at the site of tissue repair in order to enhance and improve tissue regeneration. In this review, we present the state of art of gene therapy in the applications of periodontal tissue and peri-implant regeneration., Purpose: We aim herein to review the currently available methods for gene therapy, which include the utilization of viral/non-viral vectors and how they might serve as therapeutic potentials in regenerative medicine for periodontal and peri-implant tissues.

Purpose: This meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in combination with non-surgical therapy compared to non-surgical therapy alone for patients with peri-implantitis., Methods: Bibliographic databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Data and CBM were searched from inception to April 1st 2018 , to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of photodynamic therapy in combination with non-surgical therapy and non-surgical therapy alone for peri-implantitis. Two reviewers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data, and assessed the quality. Then after cross-checking, meta analyses was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software. Meta analysis of probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing(BOP) and clinical attachment level(CAL) was conducted using weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals(CI)., Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta analysis results showed that compared to non-surgical therapy alone, PDT in combination with non-surgical therapy showed significant differences in PD(WMD=-0.81,95%CI -1.52 to -0.11, P=0.02), BOP(WMD=-5.15, 95%CI -6.29 to -4.01, P<0.00001), but no significant differences in CAL(WMD=-1.13, 95%CI -3.51 to 1.25, P=0.35)., Conclusions: In the treatment of peri-implantitis, compared to non-surgical therapy alone, non-surgical therapy with PDT was more effective in reduction of probing depth and probing bleeding, but it did not significantly improve clinical attachment level. For the quantity and quality limitation of the included studies, the conclusion has to be further proved by performing more well-designed and high quality RCTs.

Objectives: To determine if the treatment of mucositis with mechanical debridement, 0.12% chlorhexidine, and a further application of Lactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) will result in an improvement of the clinical and microbiological parameters in comparison to the treatment with mechanical debridement and 0.12% chlorhexidine alone., Material and Methods: Fifty dental implants with mucositis in 50 patients were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: mechanical debridement, 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash, and the subsequent administration of a probiotic agent (test group) or mechanical debridement and 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash (control group). Data were analyzed to determine clinical and microbiological changes during treatment and after a follow-up period of 3 months., Results: After the administration of 0.12% chlorhexidine, all clinical parameters improved in the test and the control group, observing a significant decrease in Full Mouth Plaque Index (FMPI), full mouth bleeding on probing (FMBOP), Plaque Index (PI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) at the implant. However, following the administration of probiotics or placebo, the clinical variables, except for probing pocket depth, slightly and progressively increased up to 3 months of follow-up, but without reaching baseline levels. From a microbiological point of view, no major alterations of the subgingival microflora were recorded at different time points between groups during the study., Conclusions: Treatment with mechanical debridement, oral hygiene reinforcement, and administration of 0.12% chlorhexidine was effective in reducing mucositis, but it did not always result in complete resolution of inflammation. The administration of probiotics did not seem to provide an additional clinical or microbiological benefit., Clinical Relevance: The use of probiotics does not seem to provide an additional benefit in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis.

Titanium dental implants have been successfully used for decades; however, some implants are affected by peri-implantitis due to bacterial infection, resulting in loss of supporting bone. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an antimicrobial chemotherapy employing H 2 O 2 photolysis-developed to treat peri-implantitis-on biofilm-contaminated titanium surfaces in association with osteoblastic cell proliferation on the treated surface. Titanium discs were sandblasted and acid-etched, followed by contamination with a three-species biofilm composed of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Streptococcus mitis. This biofilm model was used as a simplified model of clinical peri-implantitis biofilm. The discs were subjected to ultrasound scaling, followed by H 2 O 2 photolysis, wherein 365-nm LED irradiation of the disc immersed in 3% H 2 O 2 was performed for 5 min. We analysed proliferation of mouse osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) cultured on the treated discs. Compared with intact discs, biofilm contamination lowered cell proliferation on the specimen surface, whereas H 2 O 2 photolysis recovered cell proliferation. Thus, H 2 O 2 photolysis can recover the degraded biocompatibility of biofilm-contaminated titanium surfaces and can potentially be utilised for peri-implantitis treatment. However, to verify the findings of this study in relation to clinical settings, assessment using a more clinically relevant multi-species biofilm model is necessary.

Peri-implant mucositis has been defined as a reversible inflammatory reaction in the soft tissues around a functioning implant with no bone loss. This paper reviews the prevalence, etiology, risk indicators, prevention, and treatment of mucositis. Relying on the literature concerning mucositis, the bacterial etiology is discussed as well as the varying ranges of prevalence, reported to be from 20% to 80% of subjects (13% to 62% of implants) after a minimum of 5 years of implant function. A discussion of the definition of mucositis questions the assumption of it being completely reversible following treatment and challenges the concept of mucositis "transfer" (conversion) to peri-implantitis.

An undesirable injury of adjacent teeth is one of many accidents that may occur during implant placement. Limited surgical access in a noncooperative patient can induce apical root transection. When endodontic pathosis is identified, root canal treatment is often initiated to prevent implant microbial contamination. This case report demonstrates the successful resolution of implant endodontitis by endodontic intervention without any surgical treatment in a patient presenting a moderate mental disorder.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets., Materials and Methods: An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment., Results: Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group., Conclusion: Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.

Purpose: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been applied in treatment of peri-implantitis for its antimicrobial effects. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a Denfotex PAD Light System's photodynamic therapy on prevention of peri-implantitis., Methods: Twenty patients with implants in molar area were treated with photoactivated disinfection right after completion of suprastructures. The irradiation time was 30 seconds for mesial, distal, buccal and lingual/palatal sites respectively at a power output of 100mW. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples from these patients were obtained before photodynamic treatment, 2 weeks and 3 months after treatment. GCF was collected using paper points, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed to determine the cytokine (IL-1β, ΤΝF-α, IL-6 and ΙL-17) levels. The data were analyzed with SPSS 23.0 software package., Results: ELISA showed IL-1β and ΤΝF-α levels of all patients were decreased 2 weeks and 3 months after treatment. Reduction of IL-1β, ΤΝF-α, IL-6 and IL-17 from 2 weeks to 3 months and from baseline to 3 months all showed a significant difference (P＜0.05)., Conclusions: Denfotex PAD light system is effective in reducing peri-implant inflammatory mediators and can work as an effective treatment to prevent peri-implantitis.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of subgingival glycine air polishing (GPAP) in the treatment of moderate-mild peri-implantitis., Methods: Twenty-five patients with peri-implantitis were randomly recruited according to the inclusion and the exclusion criteria. They were divided into conventional scaling treatment group and GPAP treatment group. Periodontal clinical indicators were recorded before treatment(baseline level) and 6 months after treatment. The indicators included modified plaque index (mPLI), bleeding on probing (BOP), modified sulcus bleeding index (mSBI), probing pocket depth (PPD) and attachment level (AL). A periodontal probe (PCP 12) was used for all examinations. SPSS 21.0 software package was used for statistical analysis., Results: At the baseline level, clinical periodontal parameters were similar between the experimental group and the control group. Six months after treatment, the overall clinical periodontal index was below the baseline, with significant difference (P＜0.05) compared with the baseline and between the two groups., Conclusions: GPAP can improve the efficacy and comfort during treatment of moderate-mild peri-implantitis. However, this improvement may just be short-term, and the long-term efficacy may need a long-term follow-up of larger samples.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy on the healing of mechanical decontamination of infected implant surfaces performed with a titanium brush., Methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars were extracted bilaterally in six dogs. After 3 months, two unsubmerged implants were installed on both sides of the mandible. Three months later, peri-implantitis was induced with ligatures for 3 months and then removed. After 1 month, surgical mechanical decontamination of the surfaces was performed either with a rotatory titanium brush or gauzes soaked in saline. Five month later, biopsies were retrieved. Evaluations on X-rays taken of the mesiodistal plane and on histological slides prepared in a buccal-lingual plane were performed., Results: After the induction of peri-implantitis, a mean marginal bone loss of 2.6 ± 0.6 mm and 1.9 ± 1.0 mm was observed in the brush and gauze groups by X-ray, respectively. Five months after treatment, a mean gain of marginal bone of 0.6 mm was obtained in both groups. The mean closures of the vertical and horizontal defects were 0.6 mm and 0.6 mm for the brush group, and 0.8 mm and 0.5 mm for the gauze group, respectively. Histologically, a loss of attachment at the buccal aspect of 2.2 ± 0.9 mm in the brush group and of 2.3 ± 0.5 mm in the gauze group was found. No statistically-significant differences were found after the treatment., Conclusions: Mechanical implant surface decontamination performed with a rotatory titanium brush resulted in a marginal bone level gain, yielding a low content of inflammatory infiltrate close to the marginal bone., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

In the inflamed microenvironment of peri-implantitis, limited osteogenesis on the implant surface impedes well-established reosseointegration using current clinical therapies. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) function as potent molecular managers that may simultaneously regulate multiple endogenous processes such as inflammation and osteogenesis. The delivery of miRNAs may provide a way to effectively treat some diseases. In this study, we showed that miR-27a was differentially downregulated in samples from a canine peri-implantitis model. We found that overexpressing miR-27a positively regulated osteogenesis-angiogenesis coupling by ameliorating the TNF-α inhibition of bone formation in vitro. Mechanistically, we identified Dickkopf2 (DKK2) and secreted frizzled related protein 1 (SFRP1) as two essential direct miR-27a targets that were osteogenic and angiogenic. Furthermore, we constructed a miR-27a-enhanced delivery system to repair the bone defect around implants in a canine peri-implantitis model. The results demonstrated that the miR-27a-treated group could optimize new bone formation and reosseointegration in vivo. Our assay provides evidence that this strategy exerts therapeutic effects on peri-implantitis, suggesting that it represents a feasible method to maintain the stability and masticatory function of dental implants. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research., (© 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.)

This report presents six consecutive cases of peri-implantitis associated with residual methacrylate cement. The cases responded to cement removal and disinfection procedures. Six patients, each presenting one methacrylate cement-retained implant restoration and showing peri-implant inflammation and bone loss, were treated. All the cases were negative for bleeding on probing after 6 weeks, and this was maintained at 1 year of follow-up from nonsurgical therapy and crown refixation with alternative and resorbable cement. The treatment effectively solved the inflammation and led to complete restoration ad integrum, as evaluated clinically and radiographically, after 1 year.

Research objective - an assessment of morphological and element composition various as surfaces of implants, with the diagnosis periimplantitis, subjected to processing by the Er laser; Cr; YSGG wave of 2780 nanometers long in comparison with not subjected. Used implants of three producers: (1 - Nobel Biocare (Sweden), TiUnite surface; 2 - XIVE Dentsplay (Germany), SLA surface; 3 - BioHorizons (USA), RBM surface). Electronic and microscopic methods investigated surfaces of the control (new) implants removed with the diagnosis periimplantit, with the diagnosis periimplantit and processed by the laser. It is revealed that the surface of new sterile implants isn't ideal, on it there are traces of impregnation by inorganic connections, a large amount of foreign chemical elements, especially on a surface of SLA of an implant of XIVE Dentsplay is revealed. The surface of skilled implants with the diagnosis periimplantit is very strongly polluted by carbon (C), phosphorus (P), sulfur (S), silicon (Si), etc., being formed on a surface during an inflammation. After processing of the same surface by the Er laser; Cr; YSGG wave of 2780 nanometers long occurs surface clarification, and the element structure almost completely corresponds to the control.

Rationale: The purpose of this report is to present a case of peri-implantitis with successful regeneration. The surface of the affected dental implant was decontaminated with an ultrasonic scaler and treated with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative., Patient Concerns: A 52-year-old male was referred for evaluation of a dental implant placed in the mandibular right second premolar area., Diagnosis: The radiographic evaluation showed the loss of supporting bone around the dental implant. Bleeding upon probing and suppuration were observed, with the deepest probing depth at 6 mm., Interventions: The area was firstly treated with a nonsurgical approach. After re-evaluation, a full-thickness flap was elevated. The area was well debrided using various instruments, including curettes and an ultrasonic scaler. The defect area was grafted with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative., Outcomes: Histopathologic evaluation revealed chronic inflammation with fibrosis and calcification. The evaluation at 2 years and 3 months after surgery showed that the prosthesis was functioning well. Bleeding upon probing and suppuration was not noted, and reduction of probing depth was seen, with the deepest depth at 4 mm. The area showed maintenance of graft material with increased radiopacity around the dental implant., Lessons: In conclusion, a case of peri-implantitis can be successfully treated with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite and enamel matrix derivative after surface decontamination with an ultrasonic scaler.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a toothpaste containing 0.3% triclosan in volunteers that have been treated for peri-implantitis and were enrolled in a maintenance program., Material and Methods: Subjects presenting at least one implant with peri-implantitis were selected. They received anti-infective surgical therapy, and sixty days post-surgery (baseline) were randomized into two groups, brushing twice/day for 2 years (a) with a toothpaste containing 0.3% triclosan+2.0% PVM/MA copolymer (Gantrez TM )+1,450 ppm fluoride (test) or (b) with a toothpaste containing 1,450 ppm fluoride (control). They received clinical and microbiological monitoring at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, and professional maintenance every 3 months., Results: A total of 102 subjects were enrolled (test: 48; control: 54). The control group showed loss of clinical attachment (CA) around treated implants over the course of the study (p < 0.05), while the test group was stable for this parameter. The difference between groups (0.55 mm) for CA change between baseline and 24 months (primary outcome variable) was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Red complex pathogens were only reduced in the test group at 24 months. The implants with no history of peri-implantitis in the test group had a significant reduction in the percentage of sites with bleeding on probing and in mean probing depth, throughout the study (p < 0.05). This improvement was not observed in the control group., Conclusion: A toothpaste containing 0.3% triclosan was more effective than a toothpaste without triclosan in maintaining a healthy peri-implant environment around treated implants and implants with no history of peri-implantitis during a 2-year maintenance program (ClinicalTrials.govNCT03191721)., (© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To report the clinical outcomes for patients with implants treated for peri-implantitis who subsequently received supportive care (supportive peri-implant/periodontal therapy) for at least 3 years., Material and Methods: A systematic search of multiple electronic databases, grey literature and hand searching, without language restriction, to identify studies including ≥10 patients was constructed. Data and risk of bias were explored qualitatively. Estimated cumulative survival at the implant- and patient-level was pooled with random-effects meta-analysis and explored for publication bias (funnel plot) at different time intervals., Results: The search identified 5,761 studies. Of 83 records selected during screening, 65 were excluded through independent review (kappa = 0.94), with 18 retained for qualitative and 13 of those for quantitative assessments. On average, studies included 26 patients (median, IQR 21-32), with 36 implants (median, IQR 26-45). Study designs (case definitions of peri-implantitis, peri-implantitis treatment, supportive care) and population characteristics (patient, implant and prosthesis characteristics) varied markedly. Data extraction was affected by reduced reporting quality, but over 75% of studies had low risk of bias. Implant survival was 81.73%-100% at 3 years (seven studies), 74.09%-100% at 4 years (three studies), 76.03%-100% at 5 years (four studies) and 69.63%-98.72% at 7 years (two studies). Success and recurrence definitions were reported in five and two studies respectively, were heterogeneous, and those outcomes were unable to be explored quantitatively., Conclusion: Therapy of peri-implantitis followed by regular supportive care resulted in high patient- and implant-level survival in the medium to long term. Favourable results were reported, with clinical improvements and stable peri-implant bone levels in the majority of patients., (© 2018 The Authors. Clinical Oral Implants Research Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

When celebrating 100 yr of dental research in the Nordic dental research community (i.e. Nordisk Odontologisk Förening (NOF)), it is relevant to include dental implant treatment. In essence, the successful progress of implant treatment has added both to the quality of life for patients and also to many aspects of professional development and job satisfaction for dentists. When appreciating the success story it also seems relevant to highlight some of the problems related to this treatment. Both technical and biological complications have often been ignored when reporting long-term results following implant treatment. Different opinions have been expressed in relation to the etiology of peri-implant diseases. Some even choose to ignore this condition as a clinical problem. This article presents a short overview of peri-implant diseases (i.e. peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis). The lack of internationally agreed disease definitions for peri-implant diseases, as with periodontitis, results in wide variation of estimates for the occurrence of peri-implant diseases when epidemiological data are reported. The profession still strives to find and define the best way to deal with peri-implant diseases once they are accurately diagnosed. Awareness of the tissue conditions in the peri-implant area, and relevant action when indicated, seems to be critical for the continued long-term successful outcome of dental implant treatment., (© 2018 Eur J Oral Sci.)

Background: To evaluate the effects of single application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to open flap debridement (OFD) and OFD alone in patients with peri-implantitis (PI)., Materials and Methods: Twenty four patients with PI were divided into 2 groups receiving aPDT with OFD and OFD alone respectively. Peri-implant plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), pocket depth (PD) and marginal bone level (MBL) were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months post-therapy. Digital periapical radiographs were taken and viewed on a calibrated computer screen using a software for the assessment of MBL. Only single implant from each patient was included in the study protocol (intent to treat analysis)., Results: At baseline, peri-implant PI, BOP, PD and MBL were comparable among individuals in aPDT and OFD groups. All patients had localized peri-implant PD ≥5 mm. At 6 months, aPDT and OFD significantly reduced peri-implant PI, BOP, PD and MBL. Similarly, after 12 months post-therapy, both groups reduced PI, BOP, PD and MBL. However, there was no significant difference between aPDT and OFD groups over time., Conclusion: Single application of aPDT as an adjunct to OFD does not provide additional benefit in improving clinical and radiographic peri-implant parameters in peri-implantitis., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Purpose: Decontamination of the rough surfaces of dental implants is a challenge in the treatment of peri-implantitis. An acceptable cleaning technique must be able to debride and detoxify the surface without traumatizing it. This study assessed the possible implant surface alterations following decontamination with laser, photodynamic therapy (PDT), and application of chlorhexidine (CHX)., Materials and Methods: Of 16 dental implants with sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surfaces, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans was cultured on the surfaces of 15 implants for 48 hours. These 15 implants were divided into five groups of three and were subjected to erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation, 630 nm light-emitting diode and toluidine blue O photosensitizer, 810 nm diode laser, and indocyanine green-based photosensitizer, 2% CHX, and control group (no treatment). One implant remained intact. The morphology and element/phase identification of the implants were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), respectively., Results: The SEM images and EDS maps revealed that the decontamination methods did not alter the surface quality of the implants. However, in photodynamic therapy, sodium chloride that remained from rinsing liquid can make an adhesive layer on the surface of the treated implants., Conclusion: Er:YAG laser irradiation and PDT did not alter the surfaces of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched implants.

Introduction: Peri-implantitis is one of the late complications that leads to implant failure and is associated with specific microorganisms identified as periodontopathic bacteria. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the different implant surfaces and number of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, and Treponema denticola using TaqMan PCR assay after peri-implantitis treatment using photodynamic therapy., Method: Forty-eight dental implants with four different surface treatments (M: machined; SA: sandblasted acid-etched; S: 1 µ m sputter HA-coated; and P: plasma spraying HA-coated) were inserted in six beagle dogs. After nine months of peri-implantitis induction, a split mouth design was used; on control side decontamination was performed using open flap mechanical debridement OFD with plastic curette, while photodynamic therapy PDT using diode laser (Ga Al As 830-nm) was used in the test side. For the following 2 weeks low-level laser therapy LLLT (10mW) was applied for the test side on alternative days for 6 sec on each implant side. Peri-implant microbial samples were collected using paper points and analyzed using TaqMan PCR before peri-implantitis treatment, immediately after treatment and 5 months posttreatment., Results: Both treatment modalities showed significant decrease in all bacterial count from baseline to immediately after treatment (P< 0.0001). The count increased between immediately after treatment to 5 months after treatment (P< 0.0001); however, the count after 5 months was significantly lower than at baseline. PDT had a stronger effect on reducing P. gingivalis count than T. denticola and T. forsythi a compared to OFD. For T. forsythi a, implant surface treatment had the greatest effect which was also statistically significant (P= 0.02) with considerably lower effect of PDT or their interaction., Conclusion: The results suggest that PDT and OFD have significant benefits in peri-implantitis treatment by reducing bacterial count. The presence of bacterial complex with different response to therapeutic modality suggests the use of combined decontamination methods for peri-implantitis treatment.

Bone regeneration and reosseointegration around a dental implant were radiographically and histologically analyzed after regenerative treatment for peri-implantitis, using a case from a human autopsy. A block specimen including the tissue around the implants was obtained from the patient, who died from cancer 20 months after regenerative surgery using a synthetic bone substitute to treat peri-implantitis. Microcomputed tomographic and histologic analyses were performed. Three-wall intrabony defects at the implant placed at the site of the mandibular left first molar and a circumferential defect at the implant at the site of the mandibular left second molar were substantially filled with newly formed bone and residual bone substitute particles, and reosseointegration on the previously exposed implant surface was histologically observed.

Introduction: Nonsurgical and surgical management of periimplant mucositis and periimplantitis have shown promising results in arresting periimplant marginal bone loss (MBL) and preventing implant loss. However, management of periimplant diseases still remains unpredictable for full reconstruction of lost tissues and completely arrests disease progression. The present study proposes a decision tree that compiles both clinical and radiographic presentation of failing implants to aid in the decision making for their management., Materials and Methods: An extensive literature review was performed using 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central) on the most recent treatment modalities for the management of periimplant diseases., Discussion: Evidence-based treatment suggestions were primarily derived from periimplant defect morphology, presence, and severity of periimplant MBL. More evidence is required supporting soft-tissue augmentation for the treatment of periimplant diseases., Conclusion: Management of periimplant diseases can include lasers, mechanical instrumentation, chemical detoxification, and antimicrobial agents for nonsurgical approaches. On the other hand, removal of failing implants, resective surgery, guided bone regeneration, and soft-tissue grafting are presented as valid options for the surgical treatment of periimplantitis.