151. Return to school in the COVID-19 era: considerations for temperature measurement
- Author
-
Paolo Manganotti, Giovanni Furlanis, Alex Buoite Stella, Agostino Accardo, Miloš Ajčević, Buoite Stella, A., Manganotti, P., Furlanis, G., Accardo, A., and Ajcevic, M.
- Subjects
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak ,infra-red thermal camera ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Fever ,Infrared Rays ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Pneumonia, Viral ,Biomedical Engineering ,Safety rule ,Body Temperature ,Betacoronavirus ,Pandemic ,Humans ,Pandemics ,Normality ,media_common ,fever ,Schools ,business.industry ,SARS-CoV-2 ,non-contact thermometry ,COVID-19 ,temperature ,General Medicine ,Public relations ,Thermography ,Business ,Coronavirus Infections - Abstract
COVID-19 pandemics required a reorganisation of social spaces to prevent the spread of the virus. Due to the common presence of fever in the symptomatic patients, temperature measurement is one of the most common screening protocols. Indeed, regulations in many countries require temperature measurements before entering shops, workplaces, and public buildings. Due to the necessity of providing rapid non-contact and non-invasive protocols to measure body temperature, infra-red thermometry is mostly used. Many countries are now facing the need to organise the return to school and universities in the COVID-19 era, which require solutions to prevent the risk of contagion between students and/or teachers and technical/administrative staff. This paper highlights and discusses some of the strengths and limitations of infra-red cameras, including the site of measurements and the influence of the environment, and recommends to be careful to consider such measurements as a single "safety rule" for a good return to normality.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF