Search

Background and Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety of the omission of immediate neck dissections (IND) in patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) achieving a less than complete nodal response on 12-week FDG PET-CT., Material and Methods: Patients with HPV-positive, node-positive HNSCC that were treated with radical (chemo) radiotherapy (RT) between January 2013 and September 2019 were identified. PET-CT responses were classified as complete (CR), incomplete (ICR) or equivocal (EQR) nodal responses. Clinical outcomes were obtained., Results: 347 patients were identified. Median follow-up was 43.9 (IQR, 30.8-61.2) months. 62.8% (218/347) achieved a CR, 23.4% (81/347) EQR and 13.8% (48/347) ICR nodal response. 70 of 81 (86.4%) patients with an EQR and 25 of 48 (52.1%) with an ICR had no residual disease during follow up (a pathologically negative ND if surgery undertaken or no subsequent neck or distant relapse clinically/radiologically). Median survival of the EQR and CR groups were not reached, and despite the omission of IND in 95% of the EQR group there was no statistically significant differences in overall survival (OS) between the groups, p = 1.0. Median survival of ICR was not reached. However, OS for ICR group was significantly worse than that of CR, and EQR, both p < 0.001., Conclusion: The omission of IND in those achieving an EQR nodal response does not compromise long-term survival. This supports the safety of extended surveillance in patients with HPV-positive disease and an EQR on 12-week FDG PET-CT., (Crown Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx is a malignancy of increasing prevalence. The oncologic community is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of de-intensifying treatment without compromising oncologic outcomes. Paramount to these treatment algorithms is primary surgery through transoral approaches. This article reviews the literature and concepts pertaining to transoral surgery and describes the two most common techniques, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS)., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The lip-split mandibulotomy (LSMA) is an access procedure that has been used in head and neck (H&N) surgery as an aid to surgical resection of inaccessible tumours of the postertior oral cavity and oropharynx. Anecdotal evidence suggests that it has significant morbidity. Voices of concern within the H&N surgical community suggest that it has been abandoned in favour of technological advances such as robotic surgery. We report here the first (to our knowledge) registered systematic review of its kind, documenting the safety and efficiency of LSMA in H&N surgery. We performed a PRISMA-guided systematic review (PROSPERO-registered) and identified reports using a search algorithm in MEDLINE/EMBASE. LSMA-related surgical complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Secondary outcomes included swallowing dysfunction, facial cosmesis, and patient satisfaction recorded in health-related quality of life questionnaires (HRQoL). From 125 studies identified, 54 met the inclusion criteria (3872 patients). The LSMA mortality rate was 0%; we did not identify a single case of perioperative death. The median rate of osteoradionecrosis was 5.4%, whereas fistula formation was 5.7%. Malunion was noted in 4.9%. Other complications (surgical site infection, plate exposure) were around 5%. There was significant between-study variation with regards to swallowing assessment tools, but overall there was no significant difference in outcomes. This was also the case for the HRQoL questionairres. LSMA is a safe procedure with an acceptable rate of complications, and should definitely remain in the armamentarium of H&N surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Crown Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Robotic systems for head and neck surgery are at different stages of technical development and clinical application. Currently, robotic systems are predominantly used for transoral surgery of the pharynx and larynx. Robotic surgery of the neck, the thyroid, and the middle and inner ear is much less common; however, some oncological and functional outcomes have been reported. This article provides an overview of the current state of robot-assisted head and neck surgery with a special emphasis on patient benefit and postoperative quality of life (QoL). The focus is placed on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the resection of oropharyngeal carcinomas. For this application, reported long-term outcomes show functional post-operative advantages for selected oropharyngeal cancer patients after TORS compared to open surgery and primary radiotherapy. Since TORS also plays a significant role in the context of potential therapy de-escalation for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer patients, ongoing trials are presented. Regarding the evaluation of the therapeutic benefit and the QoL of cancer patients, special attention has to be paid to the large degree of variability of individual patients' preferences. Influencing factors and tools for a detailed assessment of QoL parameters are therefore detailed at the beginning of this article. Notably, while some robotic systems for ear and skull base surgery are being developed in Europe, TORS systems are mainly used in North America and Asia. In Europe and Germany in particular, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is a well-established technology for transoral tumor resection. Future trials comparing TORS and TLM with detailed investigation of QoL parameters are therefore warranted and might contribute to identifying suitable fields for the application of the different techniques., Competing Interests: Die Autorinnen/Autoren geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht., (Thieme. All rights reserved. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Objectives: Adjuvant radiotherapy is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck cancers. The radiation field is correlated with the surgical field in the adjuvant radiotherapy setting; therefore, tailoring the irradiation field is reasonable., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers included in the cancer registry between 2015 and 2019 in the study hospital. Patients who underwent whole-neck irradiation (WNI) were compared with those who underwent lower-neck-sparing (LNS) irradiation., Results: A total of 167 patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers were included in the study. Cancer recurrence was recorded in 33% of the patients. The rate of recurrence of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer at neck level IV was 8%. The 2-year incidence of level IV recurrence was lower in the WNI group than in the LNS group (2% vs. 10%; p = 0.04). The 2-year disease-free survival rates were 75% and 63% in the WNI and LNS groups, respectively (p = 0.08)., Conclusion: The rate of level IV recurrence was higher in the LNS group than in the WNI group. Trends of improvement in disease-free survival with lower-neck irradiation suggested that it is premature to consider LNS irradiation as daily practice in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

In addition to medical therapy studies and translational basic projects, surgically oriented studies are also regularly presented at the ASCO Annual Meeting. At the virtual conference in 2021, an US group presented a well-designed study on the de-escalation of adjuvant therapy after transoral robotic surgery of HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer. Furthermore, the results of an Italian group on induction therapy for resectable sinunasal carcinomas were presented. An ongoing multicenter study on the surgical treatment of early-stage oral cavity cancer will investigate the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy compared to elective neck dissection. In addition to these presentations, the following review article summarizes other studies in which surgical therapy was part of the investigational workflow., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Objectives/hypothesis: We aim to 1) evaluate trends in adjuvant treatment of human papilloma virus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer; 2) assess change in complications and functional outcomes over time; and 3) assess change in overall and disease-free survival (DFS) over time., Study Design: Retrospective analysis., Methods: Charts of patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer between 2011 and 2019 were reviewed. Trend analysis was used to compare rate of adjuvant treatment over time. The Kaplan-Meier method was conducted to analyze overall survival (OS) and DFS., Results: Three hundred and forty-two patients met inclusion criteria. One hundred and sixty-three (47.7%) patients underwent adjuvant radiation, and 90 (26.3%) patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiation. Rate of extranodular extension decreased significantly from 38.9% to 24.0% (P = .004). Rate of adjuvant therapy decreased significantly from 90.9% to 62.5% between 2011 and 2019 (P = .001). In patients who received adjuvant treatment, rate of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy decreased significantly from 40.0% to 20.0% (P < .0005). There was a decrease in rate of 1-year gastrostomy tube dependence in patients treated in 2015 to 2019 versus 2011 to 2014 (2.2% vs. 7.1%, P = .025). In 2011 to 2014, 2-year OS and DFS were 96% and 89%, respectively; in 2015 to 2019, 2-year OS and DFS were 96% and 94%, respectively. There was no difference in OS or DFS between the two time periods., Conclusions: The rate of adjuvant therapy, particularly chemotherapy, has decreased over time. One-year gastrostomy tube dependence rate has decreased significantly from 2011 to 2014 to 2015 to 2019. There was no change in OS and DFS over this time period., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:806-812, 2022., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is becoming widely used in Japan, and information on postoperative hemorrhage is needed. We treated a patient who developed a second massive postoperative hemorrhage on Day 35 post-TORS. The 69-year-old man was diagnosed with p16-positive, T1N1M0 stage I cancer of the anterior wall of the oropharynx. Curative treatment began with right neck dissection. The external carotid artery and its branches were not ligated. One month after right neck dissection, TORS was conducted. On Day 23 post-TORS, the patient was brought to the emergency room due to pharyngeal bleeding. Hemorrhage was stopped by reclosing the site with Z-shaped silk sutures. Severe hemorrhage recurred on Day 35 post-TORS. The patient went into hemorrhagic shock. Tracheostomy was immediately performed. The neck dissection wound was then opened and the external carotid artery clamped. Hemostasis was confirmed transorally, but the hemorrhage site was again sutured with Z-shaped silk sutures to stop the bleeding. The patient was discharged on Day 58 post-TORS. Even in hindsight, this hemorrhage would have been difficult to prevent with better local treatment. This means that using transcervical arterial ligation together with TORS is appropriate from the perspective of making every effort to prevent potentially fatal postoperative hemorrhage., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We have no conflicts of interest to disclose in relation to this manuscript., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: To identify factors that may predict the need for feeding tubes in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the perioperative setting., Study Design: Retrospective chart review., Setting: Academic tertiary center., Methods: A retrospective series of patients undergoing TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) was identified between October 2016 and November 2019 at a single tertiary academic center. Patient data were gathered, such as frailty information, tumor characteristics, and treatment, including need for adjuvant therapy. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with feeding tube placement following TORS., Results: A total of 138 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.2 years (range, 37-88 years) and 81.9% were male. Overall 82.9% of patients had human papilloma virus-associated tumors, while 28.3% were current or former smokers with a smoking history ≥10 pack-years. Eleven patients (8.0%) had a nasogastric or gastrostomy tube placed at some point during their treatment. Five patients (3.6%) had feeding tubes placed perioperatively (<4 weeks after TORS), of which 3 were nasogastric tubes. Six patients (4.3%) had feeding tubes placed in the periadjuvant treatment setting for multifactorial reasons; 5 of which were gastrostomy tubes. Only 1 patient (0.7%) was gastrostomy dependent 1 year after surgery. Multiple logistic regression did not demonstrate any significant predictive variables affecting perioperative feeding tube placement following TORS for OPSCC., Conclusions: Feeding tubes are seldom required after TORS for early-stage OPSCC. With appropriate multidisciplinary planning and care, patients may reliably avoid the need for feeding tube placement following TORS for OPSCC.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of primary radiotherapy (RT) versus surgery in early-stage human papilloma virus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (hpv+OPC), and investigate the preoperative clinical factors that can predict the requirement for postoperative adjuvant treatment., Materials and Methods: This multicenter study included 166 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition-Stages I-II hpv+OPC. Sixty (36.1%) and 106 (63.9%) patients underwent primary (concurrent chemo)radiotherapy [(CC)RT] and surgery, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (73.6%) in the surgery group received postoperative (CC)RT., Results: With a median follow-up of 45.6 months for survivors, the 2-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and locoregional control (LC) for RT/surgery were 97.8%/96.4%, 91.1%/92.0%, and 92.9%/93.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, patients with synchronous radiologic extranodal extension and conglomeration (ENEcong) of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) showed significantly poorer OS (p=0.047), PFS (p=0.001), and LC (p=0.003). In patients undergoing primary surgery, two or more clinically positive LN metastases (odds ratio [OR], 5.15; p=0.004) and LN metastases with ENEcong (OR, 3.75; p=0.009) were predictors of postoperative chemoradiotherapy. No patient in the primary RT group demonstrated late severe toxicity whereas three (2.8%), one (0.9%), and one (0.9%) patient in the surgery group showed grade 3 dysphagia, grade 3 xerostomia, and fatal oral cavity bleeding., Conclusion: We found no differences in OS, PFS, and LC between upfront RT and surgery in stage I-II hpv+OPC which warrants comparison through a prospective trial in the treatment de-escalation era. However, most early-stage hpv+OPC patients undergoing surgery received adjuvant (CC)RT. Pretreatment LN findings were prognostic and predictive for adjuvant treatment.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the CO 2 waveguide laser (WG CO 2 laser) with flexible fiber (Lumenis Ltd., Yokneam, Israel) in the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers, specifically focusing on postoperative outcomes, pain, and quality of life (QoL). Eighty-one patients, 43 women and 38 men, with oral or oropharyngeal cancer who consecutively underwent transoral resection by WG CO 2 laser from August 2015 to April 2020 were retrospectively enrolled. Resections were performed in super pulsed mode with a power setting ranging between 3 and 10 W. Data about frozen sections, reconstruction, complication rate, length of hospital stay, tracheostomy rate and time to decannulation, nasogastric feeding tube rate and time to oral feeding, pain, and QoL were reviewed. Continuous variables were presented as mean and standard deviation. Concordance between intraoperative frozen section examination and definitive histology was calculated using Cohen's K test of agreement. The mean length of hospital stay was 13 days. The feeding tube rate was 81%; the tracheostomy rate was 35%; the feeding tube was left in place for 8 days on average, and the time to decannulation was 9 days. The only complication was a postoperative bleeding in 4 patients. The median postoperative pain score measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 was 0 and there was a constant decrease in painkiller use over the days. The overall mean composite QoL score was 77 ± 14, with excellent results in saliva, taste, pain, and speech domains. Frozen section evaluation had a specificity of 99% and a negative predictive value of 98%. WG CO 2 laser is a good and safe tool for transoral tailored resection of oral and oropharyngeal cancers. It ensures a good overall QoL and guarantees fast recovery and a very low postoperative pain., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has risen rapidly, because of an epidemic of human papillomavirus infection. The optimal management of early-stage OPSCC with surgery or radiation continues to be a clinical controversy. Long-term randomized data comparing these paradigms are lacking., Methods: We randomly assigned patients with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤ 4 cm) OPSCC to radiotherapy (RT) (with chemotherapy if N1-2) versus transoral robotic surgery plus neck dissection (TORS + ND) (with or without adjuvant therapy). The primary end point was swallowing quality of life (QOL) at 1-year using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Secondary end points included adverse events, other QOL outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival. All analyses were intention-to-treat. Herein, we present long-term outcomes from the trial., Results: Sixty-eight patients were randomly assigned (n = 34 per arm) between August 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 45 months. Longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory analyses demonstrated statistical superiority of RT arm over time ( P = .049), although the differences beyond 1 year were of smaller magnitude than at the 1-year timepoint (year 2: 86.0 ± 13.5 in the RT arm v 84.8 ± 12.5 in the TORS + ND arm, P = .74; year 3: 88.9 ± 11.3 v 83.3 ± 13.9, P = .12). These differences did not meet the threshold to qualify as a clinically meaningful change at any timepoint. Certain differences in QOL concerns including more pain and dental concerns in the TORS + ND arm seen at 1 year resolved at 2 and 3 years; however, TORS patients started to use more nutritional supplements at 3 years ( P = .015). Dry mouth scores were higher in RT patients over time ( P = .041)., Conclusion: On longitudinal analysis, the swallowing QOL difference between primary RT and TORS + ND approaches persists but decreases over time. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about the pros and cons of both treatment options (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01590355)., Competing Interests: Anthony C. NicholsResearch Funding: Novartis Canada Pharmaceuticals Inc (Inst) Eric BertheletResearch Funding: Eisai Eric WinquistConsulting or Advisory Role: Merck, Bayer, Eisai, Amgen, Roche, IpsenResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Merck (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Eisai (Inst), Ayala Pharmaceuticals (Inst) David A. PalmaThis author is a member of the Journal of Clinical Oncology Editorial Board. Journal policy recused the author from having any role in the peer review of this manuscript.Employment: London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: US patent: a method for analyzing a three-dimensional computed tomography image, US patent application no. 61/896349 (not licensed, no commercial or financial impact)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Introduction: Transoral surgery for head and neck cancer provides excellent oncologic outcomes while preserving speech and swallowing function. When neck dissection and resection of oropharynx are performed concomitantly, there is a risk of creating a communication defect or developing a pharyngocutaneous fistula. To prevent pharyngocutaneous fistula, we performed the reconstruction using a posteriorly based lateral tongue flap for communication defect., Patient: A 72-year-old male with oropharyngeal cancer (tonsil cancer) T2N1M0 underwent concomitant transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery and neck dissection. The lateral wall of the oropharynx was resected with the pharynx constrictor muscle and parapharyngeal fat due to infiltration of the parapharyngeal space by the tonsil cancer. The posteriorly based lateral tongue flap was used to close the perforation. There was no leakage to the neck postoperatively. The patient had no problem with phonation or oral intake and remained free of disease at 12 months after treatment., Conclusion: For a small defect confined to the oropharyngeal lateral wall, the posteriorly based lateral tongue flap should be considered as a useful option for reconstruction of the oropharynx without impairment of posterior function.

Objective: To analyze the oncologic outcomes and risk factors for recurrence in patients who underwent surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), and in whom adjuvant therapy was not recommended or was declined., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with OPSCC who were treated with transoral surgery only at a tertiary care academic medical center from April 2010 to March 2019., Results: Seventy-four patients met inclusion criteria. In 16, adjuvant therapy was recommended but declined. There were 8 recurrences, of which 6 had been given recommendations for adjuvant therapy. Of the 8 recurrences, 2 died, 2 are alive with disease, and 4 were successfully salvaged. Five patients died of unrelated causes. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI, P  = .016) had a significant impact on recurrence, while other pathologic features of the primary tumor such as size, location, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, and margin status did not. Margins were classified as "positive" in 4 patients, "close" in 54, and "negative" in 16. There were 3 local recurrences (4.1%), each of whom had declined adjuvant therapy. Lymph node features such as N-stage ( P  = .0004), number of positive nodes ( P  = .0005), and presence of extra-nodal extension (ENE, P  = .0042) had a statistically significant impact on relapse. Smoking history and surgical approach showed no significant impact on recurrence., Conclusion: Patients who undergo surgery for HPV-positive OPSCC with negative margins, no PNI, no LVI, and ≤1 positive lymph node without ENE have low risk for recurrence. These patients can likely be safely treated with surgery alone. Patients with these risk factors who decline adjuvant therapy are at risk for recurrence, and should be monitored.

Background: Post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) volumes and dose to target structures likely influence swallowing function and quality of life following transoral robotic surgery (TORS). The aim of this study is to analyse disease control and swallowing outcomes in patients undergoing TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) to determine the impact of omitting the primary site from the PORT treatment volume., Methods: Prospectively collected data from patients that underwent TORS between March 2013 and April 2021 were reviewed. Patients were categorized into three groups: (1) no PORT, (2) PORT to the neck alone or (3) PORT to the primary site and neck. Survival curves were generated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and swallowing was assessed using the Functional Oral Intake Scale, Public Status Scale Head and Neck, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and feeding tube/gastrostomy dependence., Results: A total of 121 patients underwent TORS, of which 103 met inclusion criteria with a median follow up of 2.6 years. No patients developed local recurrence. The 3-year regional control rates were 90%, 100% and 100% for groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Disease-specific survival was 97% over the study period. Patients that received PORT to both the primary site and the neck (group 3) had worse swallowing outcomes at 12 months., Conclusion: Following TORS for OPSCC, avoiding PORT to the primary site, in appropriately selected patients, appears to be oncologically safe and is associated with superior swallowing outcomes., (© 2022 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009 for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancers (oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [OPSCC]). This study investigated the adoption and safety of TORS., Methods: All patients who underwent TORS for OPSCC in the National Cancer Data Base from 2010 to 2016 were selected. Trends in the positive margin rate (PMR), 30-day unplanned readmission, and early postoperative mortality were evaluated. Outcomes after TORS, nonrobotic surgery (NRS), and nonsurgical treatment were compared with matched-pair survival analyses., Results: From 2010 to 2016, among 73,661 patients with OPSCC, 50,643 were treated nonsurgically, 18,024 were treated with NRS, and 4994 were treated with TORS. TORS utilization increased every year from 2010 (n = 363; 4.2%) to 2016 (n = 994; 8.3%). The TORS PMR for base of tongue malignancies decreased significantly over the study period (21.6% in 2010-2011 vs 15.8% in 2015-2016; P = .03). The TORS PMR at high-volume centers (≥10 cases per year; 11.2%) was almost half that of low-volume centers (<10 cases per year; 19.3%; P < .001). The rates of 30-day unplanned readmission (4.1%) and 30-day postoperative mortality (1.0%) after TORS were low and did not vary over time. High-volume TORS centers had significantly lower rates of 30-day postoperative mortality than low-volume centers (0.5% vs 1.5%; P = .006). In matched-pair analyses controlling for clinicopathologic cofactors, 30-, 60-, and 90-day posttreatment mortality did not vary among patients with OPSCC treated with TORS, NRS, or nonsurgical treatment., Conclusions: TORS has become widely adopted and remains safe across the country with a very low risk of severe complications comparable to the risk with NRS. Although safety is excellent nationally, high-volume TORS centers have superior outcomes with lower rates of positive margins and early postoperative mortality., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Background: In the context of tumor surgery, the median mandibulotomy as an access route to the oral cavity and oropharynx provides an excellent overview of the surgical site. However, it is not regarded entirely unproblematic with regard to early and later complications that may arise., Objective: The results and complications of the median mandibulotomy will be presented based on data collected from our own patient collective., Materials and Methods: A total of 21 patients who had undergone a median mandibulotomy as part of tumor surgery at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the SRH Zentralklinikum Suhl were examined over a period from 01 January 2010 to 31 December 2020. The patient files were retrospectively evaluated., Results: A stair-step median mandibulotomy was performed in all 21 patients. Reconstruction was performed using a 2.8 mm thick angled mandibular plate and bicortical locking screws. The mean follow-up period was 29.8 months. In all, 7 patients (33%) had a recurrence at the time of surgery; 5 patients (24%) had already undergone pre-radiation. Furthermore, 18 patients (85.7%) received adjuvant radiotherapy. We found plate loosening or extrusion in 0 of 21 cases. A salivary fistula (4.7%) was observed in 1 patient. Trismus was found in 4 (19%) cases during follow-up. Osteoradionecrosis was found in 2 (9.5%) of 21 cases. Cosmetic deficits were not observed., Conclusion: Our results show that the stair-step median mandibulotomy in combination with a 2.8 mm thick reconstruction plate and bicortical locking screws leads to a stable and safe reconstruction even with pre-irradiated situations. Plate loosening or extrusion did not occur., (© 2021. Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has shown promising results in the treatment of myriad head and neck pathologies but is now most commonly used in the investigation and management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma., Aims: The aim of this study was to report our cases of the newly introduced TORS, particularly its role in identifying primary of unknown origin and the potential implications for patients. A literature review and our early experience should begin to debunk some of the criticisms of TORS including setup times and cost., Methods: Prospective data was collected from all patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery including demographics, indication, histology results in primary of unknown origin and complications., Results: We have performed 36 TORS procedures in total ranging from intermediate to major complex. Our complication rate is low, and this has improved with the passage of time. Haemorrhage rates remain at 5.6% (n = 2), and the average length of stay is 1 day. Successful identification of a primary tumour in cancer of unknown primary was 80% (n = 8)., Conclusions: We anticipate the integration of TORS into routine practice in the investigation and management of a number of ENT pathologies following robust clinical trials., (© 2021. Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.)

This article reviews the various treatment options, by primary or postoperative external radiotherapy and by brachytherapy for the p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dose levels, fractionation and association with systemic treatments are presented. The need for neck node dissection post local treatment is discussed, as well as specificities for the management of p16-positive tumours. Guidelines for target volume selection and delineation are thoroughly elaborated. Last, the management by radiotherapy of locoregional recurrences is discussed., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objectives/hypothesis: Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct clinical entity with good prognosis, unique demographics, and a trend toward treatment deintensification. Patients with this disease may opt out of recommended postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) for a variety of reasons. The aim of this paper was to examine factors that predict patient refusal of recommended PORT in HPV-associated OPSCC, and the association of refusal with overall survival., Study Design: Retrospective population-based cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with OPSCC between January 2010 and December 2015. We primarily assessed overall survival and the odds of refusing PORT based on demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. Analysis was conducted using multivariable logistic regression and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model., Results: A total of 4229 patients were included in the final analysis, with 156 (3.7%) patients opting out of recommended PORT. On multivariable analysis, patient refusal of PORT was independently associated with a variety of socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance status, comorbidity, treatment at a single facility, and margin status. Lastly, PORT refusal was associated with significantly lower overall survival compared to receipt of recommended PORT (hazard ratio 1.69, confidence interval 1.02-2.82)., Conclusions: Patient refusal of recommended PORT in HPV-associated OPSCC is rare and associated with variety of disease and socioeconomic factors. PORT refusal may decrease overall survival in this population. Our findings may help clinicians when counseling patients and identifying those who may be more likely to opt out of recommended adjuvant therapy., Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:339-348, 2022., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

There has been increased interest in the use of transoral surgery (TOS) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). This systematic review summarizes the available evidence for validated functional outcomes following TOS for OPC, within the early postoperative period. Key databases were searched. Primary TOS resections of human subjects were included. Validated functional outcomes extracted included instrumental assessment, clinician rated, and patient reported measures. Database searches yielded 7186 titles between 1990 and December 2020. Full-text articles were obtained for 296 eligible studies, which were screened and a resulting 14 studies, comprising 665 participants were included in the review. Oropharyngeal dysfunction following TOS was observed across all three categories of outcome measures (OMs) reported and was dependent on pretreatment function, T-classification, and tumor volume. Future investigations should include optimal OMs to be used in the postoperative setting to allow for conclusive comparisons., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: We assessed locoregional control with omission of intentional primary site radiation after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and quantified nontargeted primary site dose., Methods: Following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, patients treated with primary TORS resection for squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx were reviewed. Patients with cT1-2 tumors, >2 mm margins, in whom the surgeon resected the primary without revising specimen-driven margins, qualified for omission of primary site radiation., Results: From 2014 to 2019, 112 patients met criteria. Fifty-nine (52%) patients did not receive radiation targeting the primary site; of whom, 22 received no radiation. In this group, there were no local failures; mean age was 58 years and median follow-up was 25 months. Thirty-seven patients received adjuvant radiation targeting the neck, mean bystander dose to the primary site was 28.8 Gy (range, 13.3-50.6 Gy)., Conclusion: In a 59 patient population, omission of radiation to the primary site after TORS resulted in no locoregional failures., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Trans Oral Robotic Surgery (TORS) is a modality in the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(OPSCC). This study was planned to determine whether Selective Neck Dissection (SND) is oncological safe procedure even in patients with lymph node metastases., Methods: OPSCC patients were divided into Modified Radical Neck Dissection (MRND) and SND groups. The outcome measures were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and regional recurrence free survival (RRFS)., Results: Thirty-seven SNDs and 18 MRNDs were performed. Regional relapse rate was 6.1% in SND group whilst 18.8% in MRND group(p=0.19). The 5-year OS, DFS and RRFS rates' differences were not statistically significant between SND and MRND groups (p=0.40, p=0.42 and p=0.18, respectively). At multivariate analysis, advanced stage impacted the 5-year OS and DFS(HR=9.39, p<0.01 and HR=11.03, p=0.04)., Conclusions: The SND seems to be effective in a TORS framework. The indication should be accurately discussed by the multidisciplinary tumor board., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives/hypothesis: To study use of the nasoseptal flap (NSF) to reconstruct lateral transoral robotic surgery (TORS) oropharyngectomy defects., Study Design: Retrospective case series., Methods: A clinical series of six patients undergoing NSF reconstruction of lateral TORS oropharyngectomy defects was retrospectively studied. All patients underwent TORS for the treatment of intermediate-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the lateral pharyngeal wall between January and June 2017. All patients underwent NSF reconstruction of lateral TORS defects with retrospective analysis of outcomes and complications., Results: Six patients underwent NSF reconstruction of lateral TORS defects. Operative times decreased from 180 minutes to 90 minutes over the study period. There were two cases of partial flap dehiscence and partial necrosis. There were no major donor site complications. All patients had temporary nasal obstruction and crusting. Two experienced temporary aural fullness. In all patients, the lateral wall was mucosalized in 1-3 weeks. Cephalometric analysis of preoperative imaging revealed that patients with high-arched palates (>3 cm) and defect lengths that are longer than NSF flap lengths are poor candidates for this technique., Conclusions: This NSF is a vascularized, locoregional rotational flap that can reconstruct lateral TORS defects in salvages cases or those where the parapharyngeal carotid or mandibular bone are exposed. Postoperative morbidity is limited to temporary nasal dyspnea, aural fullness, and crusting. Preoperative imaging can determine which patient will have successful defect coverage., Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:53-60, 2022., (© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.)

Purpose: The varied treatment options available to patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) can cause significant patient confusion. In particular, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become widely used for treatment of HPV-positive OPSCC. As patients commonly refer to the internet for additional information, we aim to evaluate the quality of online patient educational materials for TORS in comparison to other otolaryngology surgical procedures., Methods: The terms "transoral robotic surgery," "glossectomy," "thyroidectomy," and "neck dissection" were searched on Google. Flesch reading ease, Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level, MD review rates, and PEMAT understandability and actionability were assessed for each search term. Google trends was used to determine search interest for each term between May 2015 and May 2020., Results: Of the 30 TORS websites that met inclusion criteria, the average FRE and FKGL scores were 40.74 and 11.60 (that of an average high school senior). The FRE and FKGL scores for TORS were all statistically significantly lower than those of all comparator search terms ( P  < .05). Only 1 out of 30 TORS sites were MD reviewed, representing the lowest MD review rate across all search terms. Understandability and actionability scores for TORS were also the lowest across all search terms at 77.71% and 2.66%, respectively. TORS had the lowest search interest., Conclusions: In comparison to other common otolaryngology procedures, TORS websites are the least patient friendly. As TORS becomes a more widely used procedure, it is critical that TORS websites become higher quality resources that patients can reliably reference.

Objective: To evaluate the role of social and geographic factors on the likelihood of receiving transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or non-robotic transoral endoscopic surgery treatment in early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC)., Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried to form a cohort of patients with T1-T2 N0-N1 M0 OPSCC (AJCC v.7) who underwent treatment from 2010 to 2016. Demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment type, social, and geographic factors were all collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were then performed., Results: Among 9267 identified patients, 1774 (19.1%) received transoral robotic surgery (TORS), 1191 (12.9%) received transoral endoscopic surgery, and 6302 (68%) received radiation therapy. We found that lower cancer stage, lower comorbidity burden and HPV- positive status predicted a statistically significant increased likelihood of receiving surgery. Patients who reside in suburban or small urban areas (>1 million population), were low-to- middle income, or rely on Medicaid were less likely to receive surgery. Patients that reside in Medicaid-expansion states were more likely to receive TORS (p > .0001). Patients that reside in states that expanded Medicaid January 2014 and after were more likely to receive non-robotic transoral endoscopic surgery (p > .0001)., Conclusions: Poorer baseline health, lower socioeconomic status and residence in small urban areas may act as barriers to accessing minimally invasive transoral surgery while residence in a Medicaid-expansion state may improve access. Barriers to accessing robotic surgery may be greater than accessing non-robotic surgery., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The study objective was to identify practice patterns in oropharyngeal cancer management from 2010 to 2016 among human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated and non-HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients., Methods: The National Cancer Database was utilized to identify OPSCC patients from 2010 to 2016. Frequency distributions and multivariable analyses were generated to identify practice patterns and predictors of treatment modality., Results: A total of 35,956 patients with nonmetastatic OPSCC were included. HPV status was not associated with a treatment modality preference. At academic centers, the proportion of HPV-associated OPSCC patients versus non-HPV-associated OPSCC patients undergoing surgical management was similar (35.7%; 35.9%). Community cancer programs treated patients less often surgically but with no significant treatment preference based on HPV status. Within each facility type, HPV status was not a predictor of surgical or nonsurgical management., Conclusion: HPV association does not appear to significantly influence treatment modality preference among OPSCC patients. The proportion of OPSCC patients undergoing surgical treatment declined from 2010 to 2016., (© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: To determine the rate of gastrostomy tube dependence after transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and to determine which patient or surgical factors increase the likelihood of gastrostomy tube dependence., Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) at a single institution from January 2011 through July 2016. Patients who underwent TORS for recurrent OPSCC were excluded. Primary outcome was gastrostomy tube (g-tube) dependence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for g-tube dependence at 3-months and 1-year., Results: A total of 231 patients underwent TORS during the study period. At 3-month follow-up, 58/226 patients (25.7%) required g-tube. At 1-year and 2-year follow-up, 8/203 (3.9%) and 5/176 (2.8%), remained dependent on g-tube, respectively. Advanced T stage (T3) (OR = 6.07; 95% CI, 1.28-28.9) and discharge from the hospital with enteral access (OR = 7.50; 95% CI, 1.37-41.1) were independently associated with increased risk of postoperative gastrostomy tube dependence at 1 year on multivariable analysis., Conclusions: Long-term gastrostomy tube dependence following TORS is rare, particularly in patients that receive surgery alone. Patients with advanced T stage tumors have poorer functional outcomes. Early functional outcomes, as early as discharge from the hospital, are a strong predictor for long-term functional outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction/background: With the advent of TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS) the ease of transoral procedures has been dramatically improved. TORS is already established for its feasibility, functional and oncological outcomes for selected lesions of oral cavity, oropharynx and laryngopharynx. This study reports on preliminary results with TransOral UltraSonic Surgery (TOUSS) for oncologic resections of oral cavity, oropharyngeal and supraglottic malignancies., Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with malignancies of oral cavity, oropharynx and supraglottis underwent TOUSS with simultaneous neck dissection and adjuvant therapy as indicated, from January 2018 to April 2019. Essential equipment included the FK-retractor (Gyrus Medical, Tuttilngen, Germany) for TransOral exposure, the Olympus ENDOEYE Flex 5 mm 2D/10 mm 3D deflecting tip video laparoscopes, and 35 cm long ultrasonic harmonic scalpel (Thunderbeat). Parameters evaluated include tumor staging, mouth opening, TOUSS setup time, TOUSS primary removal time, surgical margins, blood transfusions, tracheostomy, postoperative complications, enteral feeding and resumption of oral diet, duration of hospital stay, and survival outcomes., Results: Eighteen patients underwent complete TransOral UltraSonic Surgery (TOUSS), with simultaneous unilateral or bilateral neck dissection. No procedure was abandoned intraoperatively due to difficulty in extirpation of the tumor. Margins were negative for ten patients (55.6%), close in five (27.8%), and positive in three patients (16.7%). Average TOUSS set-up time was 22.5 min (range, 10-30 min) and average TOUSS primary tumor removal time was 35.3 min (range, 15-60 min). Patients started tolerating oral feeds even in the second post op day (mean 6 days), and transitioning to complete oral feeds with removal of the nasogastric tube was achieved in all (mean, 16 days). The average hospital stay was 7.4 days (range 2-16 days). Secondary hemorrhage occurred in two cases and required an emergency tracheostomy and ligation of lingual artery. Minor cervicopharyngeal fistula occurred in four cases and settled in all with conservative non-surgical treatment. Overall survival at 3 years was 70.5%, and disease-specific survival was 94.4%., Conclusion: TransOral UltraSonic Surgery (TOUSS) is a safe and sound alternative method of endoscopic surgical treatment of oral cavity, oropharynx and supraglottic neoplasms. Advantages of this technique include faster resection time, intraoperative assistance from Narrow Band Imaging, easy affordability compared to TORS, and excellent functional outcomes., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Report the incidence of contralateral nodal failure rates in well-lateralized oropharyngeal carcinoma treated with upfront surgery and unilateral neck management., Methods: Lateralized oropharyngeal carcinomas treated with upfront surgery using transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and unilateral neck management (unilateral neck dissection ± unilateral radiation treatment) were identified. Primary endpoint was contralateral regional control (CRC). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Thirty-two patients were included. Pathologic T categories included 66% pT1, 31% pT2 and 3% pT3. Nodal diseases comprised 41% N0 and 47% N1 (AJCC 8th). Twenty-three (72%) patients had HPV related tumors. 3-years CRC, LC and OS were 100%, 96% (89-100) and 96% (CI 89-100). One patient developed a second primary with contralateral nodal disease. Only one patient died from another primary cancer., Conclusion: In selected patients with lateralized oropharyngeal cancer, treatment with TORS and ipsilateral management of the neck may be oncologically safe without significant risk of contralateral failure., Level of Evidence: Level 2., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) and primary radiotherapy are the two modalities used to treat early T stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(OPSCC). Prior literature including a recent randomized controlled trial have not shown the superiority of one modality over the other. When the modalities have similar outcomes, cost-effectiveness have an important role in deciding on the appropriate treatment. There are economic evaluations comparing the two modality with contradicting conclusions. The purpose of this review is to synthesise the evidence., Methods: This is a systematic review of economic evaluations on the treatment modalities for OPSCC, namely TORS versus radiotherapy. The main outcome measures were the Cost-utility results reported as the effectiveness and costs separately and as part of the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio., Results: Literature search identified five articles reporting cost-utility analysis, eligible for the review. A strategy is considered to be dominant when the effectiveness achieved was more at a lower cost, compared to the comparator. At the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of 50,000 to 100,000 USD per Quality Adjusted Life-Year (QALY), three studies showed dominance of strategies in the base case analysis (TORS in two and Primary Chemoradiotherapy in one). Two of the articles studied node negative patients, one of them favored TORS. Three articles had node positive patients and two of them favored TORS and one favored chemoradiotherapy in the base case analysis. On sensitivity analysis, adjuvant treatment was found to be the detrimental factor affecting the cost-effectiveness., Conclusions: TORS can be considered a cost-effective strategy in early T stage OPSCC, if the addition of adjuvant therapy involving radiotherapy can be avoided. Literature have shown that around 70% of the early cancers would require adjuvant treatment. This implies the importance of case selection while considering TORS as the initial treatment modality., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Many patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) have the option of radiation- or surgery-based therapy, and would benefit from a treatment decision aid (DA) to make decisions congruent with their personal values. Our objective was to develop a patient-centered DA for patients with OPSCC that is comprehensible, usable, acceptable, and well-designed., Materials and Methods: Decisional needs from a pilot study of OPSCC survivors and treating physicians were used to inform a web-based prototype DA. A multidisciplinary steering group developed and iteratively revised the DA. Feasibility testing was conducted in two cycles to assess perspectives of stakeholders (medical, radiation and surgical oncologists, patient education experts, and OPSCC survivors). Survey data and open-ended responses were used to evaluate and refine the DA., Results: 16 physicians, 4 patient education experts, and 6 survivors of OPSCC evaluated a web-based DA prototype in two cycles of testing. Participant feedback was used to revise the DA content and design between cycles. The majority of participants across both cycles indicated that the DA was comprehensible (97%), usable (86%), acceptable (78%), and well-designed (93%). Approximately three quarters of respondents indicated that they would use or share the DA in clinical practice., Conclusion: We developed the first patient-centered treatment decision aid (DA) designed for patients with OPSCC, to our knowledge. The DA was perceived favorably by stakeholders, with more than three quarters of respondents indicating they would use it in clinical practice. This tool may improve clinical practice as an adjunct to shared decision-making for OPSCC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the oropharyngeal function recovery of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma repaired by anterolateral thigh flap and forearm flap. Methods: Retrospective study between September 2016 and September 2020 complete line 37 cases of oropharyngeal cancer postoperative soft tissue defect of femoral anterolateral flap or forearm flap to repair the patient data, in which 22 cases, using the forearm skin flap to repair 15 cases with femoral anterolateral flap, flap survival rate of preparation, compare the two groups, the incidence of vascular crisis, The functions of swallowing, speech, and velopharyngeal closure were evaluated. Results: 21 cases of forearm flaps survived, and 1 case had vascular crisis. After surgical exploration, the contralateral forearm flaps survived transplantation. Fourteen anterolateral femoral flaps survived, 2 flaps had vascular crisis, and 1 flap survived after thrombus removal. The other one was repaired with pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for necrosis. Swallowing, speech, palatopharyngeal closure and other functions of the patients after the two kinds of flap repair had higher satisfaction. Conclusion: Forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap are good choices for soft tissue defect after oropharyngeal cancer, Must act according to the special details choice appropriate therapeutic schedule., Competing Interests: The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose., (Copyright© by the Editorial Department of Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery.)

Background: We assessed long-term patient-reported dysphagia and xerostomia outcomes following definitive surgical management with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) via a cross-sectional survey study., Methods: Patients with OPC managed with primary oropharyngeal surgery as definitive treatment at least 1 year ago between 2015 and 2019 were identified. The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and Xerostomia Inventory (XI) scores were compared across treatment types (i.e., no adjuvant therapy [TORS-A] vs. adjuvant radiotherapy [TORS+RT] vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy [TORS+CT/RT])., Results: The sample had 62 patients (10 TORS-A, 30 TORS+RT, 22 TORS+CT/RT). TORS-A had clinically and statistically significantly better MDADI scores than TORS+RT (p = 0.03) and TORS+CT/RT (p = 0.02), but TORS+RT and TORS+CT/RT were not significantly different. TORS-A had clinically and statistically significantly less XI than TORS+RT (p < 0.01) and TORS+CT/RT (p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Patients with OPC who have undergone TORS+RT or TORS+CT/RT following surgery face clinically worse dysphagia and xerostomia outcomes relative to patients who undergo TORS-A., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Importance: Understanding patient-specific risk of adverse histopathologic findings after primary surgery for human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) may help guide patient consultations., Objective: To determine the likelihood of adverse histopathologic features that may indicate adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy after primary surgery for HPV-positive OPSCC according to 2021 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was performed at a single academic tertiary care center. Of 258 patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) from March 1, 2012, to March 1, 2021, 136 consecutive, treatment-naive patients with HPV-positive OPSCC without obvious clinical extranodal extension (ENE) who underwent definitive TORS and neck dissection were included in the analysis. Indications for surgical treatment included non-deeply infiltrative oropharynx tumors, minimal soft palate involvement, and low suspicion for pathologic ENE., Exposures: Primary site TORS with neck dissection., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the adverse histopathologic features of pathologic ENE and positive surgical margins (PSM) that are indications for possible adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Outcomes were compared among varying American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition (AJCC-7) T and N categories and patient clinical characteristics., Results: Of the 136 patients included in the analysis (113 men [83.1%]; median age, 63 [interquartile range, 55-70] years), 109 (80.1%) had at least 1 indication for possible adjuvant radiotherapy. Twenty-seven patients (19.9%) had pathologic ENE and 10 (7.3%) had PSM. Thirty-four patients (25.0%) had pathologic ENE and/or PSM, whereas 3 (2.2%) had both. Age, smoking history, history of alcohol consumption, and clinical T category were not associated with pathologic ENE, PSM, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, or pN2 category or greater. The proportion of pathologic ENE varied by clinical N category: 0 of 16 for cN0, 8 of 48 (16.7%) for cN1, 3 of 23 (13.0%) for cN2a, and 16 of 45 (35.6%) for cN2b. Compared with patients with cN1-cN2a disease, patients with cN2b disease had higher odds of pathologic ENE (odds ratio, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.14-8.10). Clinical and pathologic N category were concordant in 77 patients (56.6%), whereas 42 (30.9%) were upstaged and 17 (12.5%) were downstaged., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, approximately one-quarter of carefully selected patients with HPV-positive OPSCC without obvious clinical ENE undergoing primary surgery had pathologic ENE and/or PSM. Patients with AJCC-7 cT0-cT2 cN0-cN2b disease, especially cN0-cN2a, without signs of clinical ENE may represent appropriate candidates for primary surgery when avoidance of adjuvant chemotherapy and/or reduction of adjuvant radiotherapy dose/extent are the goals.

Objective : Management of the early-stage oropharyngeal carcinoma in trismus patients underlying with multiple head and neck cancer history is a clinical challenge because minimal invasive surgery such as transoral robotic surgery or transoral laser microsurgery is contraindicated, while open surgery or concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) wound cause long-term adverse effect. Therefore, we developed a novel endoscopic surgical approach for these patients. Methods : Four patients were enrolled for endoscopic-assisted oropharyngectomy. The oropharyngeal tumor was resected with an adequate margin via a one-surgeon bimanual approach with the aid of a high-resolution videoendoscopic system, scope holder, and designed surgical instruments. The postoperative surgical margin status, trismus status, perioperative complication, average hospital stay, and follow-up period were recorded. Results : The endoscopic-assisted oropharyngectomy was successfully applied in all 4 patients with en bloc tumor excision and adequate free margin status. The mean hospital stay was 6.5 days, and all patients could tolerate oral diet within 2 weeks. There was no perioperative complication noted. No tumor recurrence was identified in patients followed up 2 years after surgery. Conclusion : Endoscopic-assisted oropharyngectomy for patients with trismus and multiple head and neck cancer history is a safe, minimal invasive, and effective treatment choice other than open surgery or CCRT. It provides a safe option for patients with limited mouth opening.

Introduction: Human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal cancer carries a good prognosis when managed with primary chemoradiotherapy. However, the dramatically increasing rate of this disease means more patients are now developing recurrence, with surgery remaining the mainstay of treatment. Despite this, there is no agreed technique for excision of recurrent oropharyngeal cancer., Objective: We describe the transoral robotic technique employed by our head and neck multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the management of patients with recurrent HPV positive oropharyngeal cancer and assess their symptom severity using quality of life and swallowing questionnaires., Method: Three (2 males:1 female, mean age 60.7 years) patients with recurrent or residual p16 positive oropharyngeal cancer following radical chemoradiotherapy were identified. All patients underwent selective neck dissection, tracheostomy, and transoral robotic surgery (TORS)-assisted partial oropharyngeal resection with the resultant defect closed with a robotic assisted radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Patient quality of life, symptom severity, and swallowing were assessed pre- and postoperatively using the University of Washington Quality of Life score and MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI)., Results: Histopathological examination revealed complete clearance of the primary lesion in all cases. Two patients made uneventful recoveries, while one patient developed a chest infection and tracheocutaneous fistula managed conservatively. Mean inpatient stay was 15 days (range 8-27). University of Washington Quality of Life and MDADI scores showed a mild improvement in symptoms following surgery., Conclusion: Surgical management of recurrent oropharyngeal cancer remains a technical challenge; however, MDT discussion and judicious use of TORS oropharyngeal resection and RFFF can result in good oncological and quality of life outcomes with acceptable postoperative complications and symptoms.

Objective: To compare the recovery and quality of life of patients with oral and oropharyngeal tumors treated with three kinds of free soft tissue flaps. Methods: The clinical data of 103 patients, including 66 males and 37 females, aged 26-74 years, who underwent primary repair of defects after resection of oral and oropharyngeal tumors in Sichuan Tumor Hospital from July 2014 to August 2020 were analyzed. Anterolateral thigh flap (ALTF) was used in 43 patients, radial forearm free flap (RFFF) in 45 patients, and lateral arm free flap (LAFF) in 15 patients. Postoperative qualities of life of patients were evaluated by the university of Washington quality of life questionnaire and oral health impact scale (HIP-14 Chinese edition). SPSS 23.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Results: The T staging of RFFF or LAFF group was significantly lower than that of ALTF group ( P <0.05). There was no significant difference in mean flap areas between ALTF group ((55.87±27.38) cm 2 ) and LAFF group ((49.93±19.44) cm 2 ), while RFFF group had smaller mean flap area ((33.18±6.05) cm 2 ) than ALTF group ( t =5.311, P <0.001) and LAFF group ( t =3.284, P =0.005). In terms of oral functions including swallowing, mastication, taste and spitmouth, there were no significant differences between LAFF group and RFFF group ( P >0.05), but both groups had better oral functions than ALTF group ( P <0.05). There was no significant difference in appearance scores between LAFF group (75(75, 75)) and ALTF group (75(75,75) vs.75(75,75), Z =-1.532, P =0.126), and both groups had higher scores than RFFF group (50(50, 75), Z values were -3.447 and -3.005 respectively, P <0.05). RFFF group had higher speech score (100(67, 100)) than LAFF group (67(50, 76), Z =-2.480, P <0.05) and ALTF group (67(33, 67), Z =-5.414, P <0.05). ALTF group had lower mean score of quality of life than RFFF group [72(56,77) vs.79(69, 89), Z =-3.070, P <0.05), but there was no statistical difference in the mean scores of qualities of life between ALTF group and LAFF group ( Z =1.754, P =0.079). According to the evaluation of oral health impact scale (HIP-14 Chinese version) 1 year after surgery, individual item scores and the average score of all items in ALTF group were lower than those in RFFF and LAFF groups ( P <0.05), with no significant difference between RFFF group and LAFF group ( P >0.05). Conclusions: RFFF has unique advantages for small tissue defects, while ALTF is suitable for large tissue defects, such as buccal penetrating defect, whole tongue and near whole tongue defect, and LAFF is a compromise choice between ALTF and RFFF. ALTF is inferior to RFFF and LAFF in oral functional reconstruction, including swallowing, chewing, taste and spittle. ALTF and LAFF are superior to RFFF in postoperative appearance.

Background: The significance of extracapsular extension (ECE) and adjuvant treatment paradigm in patients with surgically managed human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is debated., Methods: National, hospital-based, retrospective cohort study of 2663 patients pN+ HPV+ OPC who underwent primary surgery., Results: Patients with ECE had a 1.74-times risk of death (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-2.40, p = 0.001) compared to patients without ECE. Among patients with pN1, ECE-positive disease, risk of overall mortality was similar across treatment paradigms (surgery alone: ref; adjuvant radiation therapy [RT]: aHR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.36-1.85; p = 0.62; adjuvant CRT: aHR: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.34-1.32; p = 0.24). Patients with pN2 ECE-positive disease treated with adjuvant RT alone exhibited similar risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.24-4.47, p = 0.96) compared to adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). In patients with advanced, ECE-positive disease (e.g., pT3-T4pN2), adjuvant CRT did not reduce the risk of overall mortality relative to adjuvant RT., Conclusion: Although pathologic ECE negatively predicts for survival in patients with HPV+ OPC, our analyses support expansion of postoperative de-intensification clinical trial eligibility criteria in patients with ECE-positive disease., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to analyze preoperative MRI images of oropharyngeal cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment, extracted radiomics features, and constructed a disease recurrence and death prediction model using radiomics features and machine-learning techniques., Materials and Methods: A total of 157 patients participated in this study, and 107 stable radiomics features were selected and used for constructing a predictive model., Results: The performance of the combined model (clinical and radiomics) yielded the following results: AUC of 0.786, accuracy of 0.854, precision of 0.429, recall of 0.500, and f1 score of 0.462. The combined model showed better performance than either the clinical and radiomics only models for predicting disease recurrence. For predicting death, the combined model performance has an AUC of 0.841, accuracy of 0.771, precision of 0.308, recall of 0.667, and f1 score of 0.421. The combined model showed superior performance over the predictive model using only clinical variables. A Cox proportional hazard model using the combined variables for predicting patient death yielded a c-index value that was significantly better than that of the model including only clinical variables., Conclusions: A predictive model using clinical variables and MRI radiomics features showed excellent performance in predicting disease recurrence and death in oropharyngeal cancer patients. In the future, a multicenter study is necessary to verify the model's performance and confirm its clinical usefulness., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Treatment of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has undergone considerable evolution since the discovery of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated OPC. It is widely understood that HPV OPC affects a younger population and standard treatment offers improved oncologic outcomes compared with non-HPV OPC but can cause significant toxicities and long-term side effects. Surgery for treatment de-escalation is an active area of research. The purpose of this review is to explore surgery as it relates to the treatment of HPV OPC with a focus on the evolution of treatment, rationale for surgery, surgical techniques, outcomes, and the role of surgery in de-escalation of treatment., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: Transoral surgery for suspected or proven oropharyngeal malignancies has increased significantly with the practice of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS). An accepted alternative technique is endoscopic video-assisted transoral (EVAT) surgery. Our aim is to review the clinical, oncological and functional outcomes of this technique at our institution., Methods: 56 consecutive patients undergoing EVAT surgery as part of their cancer work up or treatment were reviewed, focusing on clinical, oncological, and functional outcomes., Results: Patients had primary oropharyngeal cancer or carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) staged between T0-T3 and N0-N3. EVAT surgery identified a primary in 47.1% of CUP with p16 positive disease. Major haemorrhage occurred in 1.8%, with eight post-operative complications. 8.9% of patients developed locoregional recurrence. Mean MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory score was 76.4 following EVAT surgery, 68.8 after EVAT surgery + radiotherapy and 67.1 after EVAT surgery + chemoradiotherapy CONCLUSION: Early clinical, oncological and functional outcomes following EVAT surgery are comparable to TLM and TORS., Level of Evidence: 4 (case series)., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Background: We had previously identified the following risk factors for insufficient control of early T-stage head and neck cancer by transoral surgery (TOS): (1) tumor thickness > 7 mm on enhanced computed tomography (CT), and (2) poor differentiation in pathological examination. We subsequently used a different patient cohort to validate the usefulness of these factors in determining the need for adaptation of TOS., Study Setting: A prospective observational study METHODS: Patients who received TOS as a definitive treatment between April 1, 2016 and September 30, 2020 were included. Primary control rates (by single TOS and TOS alone) in relation to the above-mentioned risk factors were calculated. Overall (O), recurrence-free (RF), and disease-free (DF) survival (S) outcomes were evaluated. A combination analysis based on the number of risk factors was also performed., Results: Patients with tumor thickness > 7 mm had a 2.88-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-8.51] higher risk of incomplete primary resection by single TOS, while patients who showed poor differentiation on pathological assessments had a 13.14-fold (95% CI 3.66-47.14) higher risk of insufficient primary control by TOS alone. The 3 year OS, RFS, and DFS rates were 99%, 83%, and 63%, respectively. Patients with both risk factors had a 93.00-fold (95% CI 4.99-1732.00) higher risk of incomplete primary control by TOS alone., Conclusions: Among patients with early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, primary control by TOS alone may not be achieved in patients with both risk factors, that is, tumor thickness > 7 mm as measured by enhanced CT and poor differentiation on pathological examination., (© 2021. Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Background: Given recent increase in prevalence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and advances in surgical capabilities, we sought to determine whether a change in frequency of surgery-based treatment for locally advanced OPSCC has occurred., Methods: Patients with T3-T4b OPSCC in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2010 to 2016 were categorized as receiving primary surgery or radiation-based therapy and stratified by human papillomavirus (HPV) status. Trends in treatment selection and factors associated with treatment type were examined., Results: 6566 patients with HPV-positive were included, of whom 489 (7.45%) received surgery and 4698 patients with HPV-negative, of whom 362 (7.71%) received surgery. The percentage of patients treated with surgery decreased from 11.8% to 5.9% for HPV-positive disease and from 9.8% to 6.3% for HPV-negative disease. Factors associated with surgery included younger age, health insurance, and treatment at academic centers., Conclusions: In HPV-positive and HPV-negative disease, the percentage of locally advanced OPSCC undergoing surgery-based therapy has decreased., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Purpose: High-risk oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) associated with tobacco exposure remains difficult to treat due to high rates of locoregional recurrence similar to oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). Current NCCN guidelines allow for surgical management of this disease, but oncologic and functional data in the modern era remain scarce. We sought to compare and contrast oncologic and functional considerations for surgical management of OPSCC and OCSCC in a cohort of Veterans., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center between 2017 and 2020, treated using a homogenous, multi-modality algorithm., Results: OPSCC tumors presented with a higher rate of perineural invasion (p < 0.05) and extranodal extension (p = 0.02) compared to OCSCC tumors. Compliance with NCCN guidelines for adjuvant treatment were lower for OPSCC patients primarily due to a higher rate of previous irradiation; re-irradiation could be delivered in 75% of patients when recommended by NCCN guidelines. Total glossectomy was accompanied by concomitant total laryngectomy in 100% of OPSCC patients and 0% of OCSCC., Conclusion: Surgical resection and free flap reconstruction of high-risk OPSCC generates oncologic outcomes comparable to OCSCC with comparable complication rates but a lower overall functional status. Reconstruction focused on rapid healing allows for high-rates of re-irradiation and minimal treatment delays., Level of Evidence: level 4., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: In the past few decades, a re-evaluation of treatment paradigms of head and neck cancers with a desire to spare patients the treatment-related toxicities of open surgery, has led to the development of new minimally invasive surgical techniques to improve outcomes. Besides Transoral Laser Microsurgery (TLM), a new robotic surgical technique namely Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) emerged for the first time as one of the two most prominent and widely used minimally invasive surgical approaches particularly for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer, a sub-entity of head and neck cancers. Recent population-level data suggest equivalent tumor control, but different total costs, and need for adjuvant chemoradiation. A comparative analysis of these two techniques is therefore warranted from the cost-utility (C/U) point of view., Methods: A cost-utility analysis for comparing TORS and TLM was performed using a decision-analytical model. The analyses adopted the perspective of a Swiss hospital. Two tertiary referral centers in Lausanne and Zurich provided data for model quantificantion., Results: In the base case analysis TLM dominates TORS. This advantage remains robust, even if the costs for TORS reduce by up to 25%. TORS begins to dominate TLM, if less than 59,7% patients require adjuvant treatment, whereby in an interval between 55 and 62% cost effectiveness of TORS is sensitive to the prescription of adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Exceeding 29% of TLM patients requiring a revision of surgical margins renders TORS more cost-effective., Conclusion: Non-robotic endoscopic surgery (TLM) is more cost-effective than robotic endoscopic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancers. However, this advantage is sensitive to various parameters, i.e.to the number of re-operations and adjuvant treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s).)