151. Differences between X-ray and MRI-determined knee cartilage thickness in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions
- Author
-
Richard B. Souza, Thomas M. Link, Karupppasamy Subburaj, M. Marsh, M.-P. Hellio Le Graverand, B. Wyman, and Sharmila Majumdar
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,Cartilage, Articular ,Male ,Radiograph ,Knee Joint ,Radiography ,Biomedical Engineering ,Osteoarthritis ,Non weight bearing ,medicine.disease_cause ,Weight-bearing ,Weight-Bearing ,Rheumatology ,Knee loading ,Medicine ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Knee ,Cartilage thickness ,business.industry ,X-ray ,Anatomy ,Organ Size ,Middle Aged ,Osteoarthritis, Knee ,musculoskeletal system ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Knee cartilage ,Case-Control Studies ,Female ,Joint space width ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,MRI - Abstract
SummaryObjectiveDetermine the effect of loading upon MRI-based mean medial femorotibial cartilage thickness (mMFT_th) and radiograph-based minimum joint space width (mJSW), and determine loading's effect on the relationship between these measures.MethodsMRI and radiographs were analyzed of 25 knees in weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing conditions. Eight subjects had a Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade of 0, indicating no evidence of radiographic OA. The rest were KL = 2 or KL = 3, indicating mild to moderate OA. The change from unloaded to loaded conditions was calculated.ResultsJoint space measures decreased from unloaded to loaded conditions for both radiographs (mJSW = 3.29 mm unloaded to 3.16 mm loaded, P
- Full Text
- View/download PDF