151. Physician Awareness and Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Diagnosis of Vaginitis Patients: A Retrospective Chart Review
- Author
-
Tiffany M. Bonus, Wendy M. Banker, and Paul Nyirjesy
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Leadership and Management ,Primary care ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pregnancy ,Internal medicine ,Chart review ,Physicians ,medicine ,vulvovaginitis ,Humans ,NAAT ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal ,Vaginitis ,Retrospective Studies ,Trichomoniasis ,business.industry ,030503 health policy & services ,Health Policy ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Vaginosis, Bacterial ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,Amsel criteria ,Clinical Practice ,Vulvovaginal Candidiasis ,vulvovaginal candidiasis ,Female ,trichomoniasis ,Bacterial vaginosis ,0305 other medical science ,business ,bacterial vaginosis - Abstract
Vaginitis is one of the main causes of primary care and gynecological visits in the United States. The most common infectious causes are bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomoniasis. A physician survey was conducted to measure awareness of vaginitis clinical guidelines and availability of in-office point-of-care (POC) diagnostic tools. Participants were asked to perform a chart review to evaluate diagnostic practices for their symptomatic vaginitis patients. A total of 333 physicians and 984 patient charts were included. Physicians were most familiar with VVC and BV diagnostic guidelines; fewer than half were aware of current trichomoniasis guidelines. Although access to POC tools used to evaluate and diagnose vaginitis varied by practice, there was limited access to all 3 tools (microscope, pH test strips, potassium hydroxide solution) required to perform a full Amsel workup for BV (47% obstetricians/gynecologists vs. 32% primary care physicians, P
- Published
- 2020