151. Quantitative Computed Tomography Protocols Affect Material Mapping and Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite-Element Analysis Predicted Stiffness
- Author
-
Michael J. Yaszemski, Ahmad Nassr, Chunfeng Zhao, Hugo Giambini, and Dan Dragomir-Daescu
- Subjects
0206 medical engineering ,Finite Element Analysis ,Biomedical Engineering ,02 engineering and technology ,computer.software_genre ,Models, Biological ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Absorptiometry, Photon ,Imaging, Three-Dimensional ,Voxel ,Bone Density ,Physiology (medical) ,Hounsfield scale ,Elastic Modulus ,medicine ,Calibration ,Cadaver ,Humans ,Computer Simulation ,Quantitative computed tomography ,Mathematics ,Aged, 80 and over ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Phantoms, Imaging ,Stiffness ,Reproducibility of Results ,Structural engineering ,Torso ,020601 biomedical engineering ,Research Papers ,Finite element method ,Spine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted ,Female ,Tomography ,Stress, Mechanical ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,computer ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Quantitative computed tomography-based finite-element analysis (QCT/FEA) has become increasingly popular in an attempt to understand and possibly reduce vertebral fracture risk. It is known that scanning acquisition settings affect Hounsfield units (HU) of the CT voxels. Material properties assignments in QCT/FEA, relating HU to Young's modulus, are performed by applying empirical equations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of QCT scanning protocols on predicted stiffness values from finite-element models. One fresh frozen cadaveric torso and a QCT calibration phantom were scanned six times varying voltage and current and reconstructed to obtain a total of 12 sets of images. Five vertebrae from the torso were experimentally tested to obtain stiffness values. QCT/FEA models of the five vertebrae were developed for the 12 image data resulting in a total of 60 models. Predicted stiffness was compared to the experimental values. The highest percent difference in stiffness was approximately 480% (80 kVp, 110 mAs, U70), while the lowest outcome was ∼1% (80 kVp, 110 mAs, U30). There was a clear distinction between reconstruction kernels in predicted outcomes, whereas voltage did not present a clear influence on results. The potential of QCT/FEA as an improvement to conventional fracture risk prediction tools is well established. However, it is important to establish research protocols that can lead to results that can be translated to the clinical setting.
- Published
- 2016