Search

Introduction Tisagenlecleucel is a CD19-directed genetically modified autologous T-cell immunotherapy approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (DLBCL-NOS), high grade B-cell lymphoma and DLBCL arising from follicular lymphoma. In the pivotal JULIET trial, 115 patients received tisagenlecleucel treatment; the best overall response rate (ORR) was 54% and complete response (CR) rate was 40%. At a median follow-up of 24 months, the median duration of response was not reached. Grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (UPenn scale) and neurotoxicity within the first 8 weeks after infusion occurred in 22.6% and 11.3%, respectively (Bachanova et. al. Hematol Oncol. Abstr 2019). CIBMTR CT Registry was developed to collect long-term safety and efficacy information on recipients of cellular immunotherapies and it is utilized for a post marketing study of tisagenlecleucel in the real-world setting. Methods Clinical data from the registry were analyzed for baseline information. Efficacy and safety data were collected from patients with a minimum of 3 months follow-up. CRS and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were reported as per the consensus ASTCT criteria. Important manufacturing product characteristics of tisagenlecleucel were compared to clinical outcomes obtained by the CIBMTR CT registry. The association of number of cells administered, cell viability, potency, and transduction efficiency to overall response, CRS and ICANS grade was performed using descriptive summaries and univariate logistic regression analyses. Tisagenlecleucel cell product characterization by immunophenotyping was also compared to clinical outcomes in the CIBMTR Registry. Results Twenty-six centers contributed data for relapsed/refractory DLBCL patients through the CIBMTR CT registry as of May 31, 2019. Baseline information was available in 70 patients while outcomes ≥ 3 months post-infusion was available on 47 patients (Table 1). All patients received cells in the FDA approved range (0.6 to 6 x 108 CAR+ viable T cells) with a median of 1.7 x 108 (range 0.6-3.5 x 108). The median follow-up time for survivors was 5.8 months (0.9-8.9 months). The overall response rate (ORR) was 59.6% (28 of 47 patients) including 38.3% (18 patients) achieving a CR. The rate of grade 3 or higher CRS and ICANS was 4.3% and 4.3%, respectively. Tocilizumab and corticosteroids were administered in 40.9% and 9.1% among patients who had CRS. The median time to onset of CRS was 4.5 days and lasted for an average of 5 days. A total of 14 (29.8%) patients died after treatment, all due to disease progression and no deaths were attributed to toxicities from tisagenlecleucel. A secondary malignancy was reported in 1 patient (basal cell carcinoma) that was present prior to CAR-T cell infusion. Out of the products manufactured for these 47 patients, 21 were out-of-commercial specification (OOS) because of low cell viability (< 80%), however, efficacy and safety outcomes were similar to those with batches meeting viability specifications. None of the manufacturing characteristics analyzed (such as cell viability, potency or transduction efficiency) correlated with either efficacy (ORR) or safety (CRS or ICANS). Importantly, analysis of cell viability showed no association with best overall response (Table 2). Conclusions The CIBMTR CT registry represents real-world data for the treatment of adults with DLBCL and allows capture of long-term follow up (15 years). The efficacy and safety in the real world setting demonstrate similar efficacy and safety as compared with the pivotal JULIET trial. Cell product characteristics analyzed, including percentage of viable cells, do not correlate with response rates, CRS or ICANS. Updated results, including tisagenlecleucel cell product characterization, will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Kamdar: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; University of Colorado: Employment. Perales:Medigene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kyte/Gilead: Research Funding; Miltenyi: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MolMed: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NexImmune: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bellicum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Nektar Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nikiforow:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; NKarta: Honoraria. Jeschke:Novartis: Employment. Chawla:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Horowitz:Mesoblast: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Chimerix: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Janssen: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Miltenyi Biotech: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Regeneron: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Sanofi: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Actinium: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; GlaxoSmithKline: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Amgen: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Kite Pharma/Gilead: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Shire: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Oncoimmune: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant. Bleickardt:Novartis: Employment. Pasquini:Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Consultancy; Medigene: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Kit Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Introduction Axi-cel is approved in the US for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma after 2 or more lines of systemic therapy. A post-marketing study is ongoing in the US utilizing the infrastructure created by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant (CIBMTR) for post-approval safety and efficacy assessment and to follow these patients for 15 years through the established cellular therapy registry. This is the first year analysis of this study. Methods From October 18, 2017 to May 1, 2019, 453 axi-cel recipients were voluntarily reported to the CIBMTR. Of these, 295 patients from 43 US centers that have at least the first follow-up assessment submitted at 3 months were included in this analysis. Median follow-up was 6 months (range, 1-14 months). Results The median age overall was 61 years, 101 (34%) patients were ≥ 65 years, and 197 (67%) patients were male (Table 1). Baseline clinical characteristics included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-1 (77%), transformed lymphoma (27%), double-hit lymphoma (36%), prior autologous transplant (34%), and chemotherapy-resistant disease (66%) prior to axi-cel. The median time from diagnosis to axi-cel infusion was 18 months (range 2-274 months). Overall response rate (ORR) was 70% (complete response [CR] 52% and partial response [PR] 18%). Patients ≥ 65 years were generally comparable vs younger patients with a slightly better CR rate (62% vs 46%, p=0.03) but similar overall response rate (CR+PR, 75% vs 67%, p=0.26). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of any grade was reported in 83% of patients. Incidence of Grades ≥ 3 CRS according to Lee et al 2014 was 11%, and was 14% according to American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Consensus Grading (Table 2). Two patients died due to CRS. Median time to any grade CRS was 3 days (range, 1-17 days), and 94% of CRS cases resolved with a median duration of 7 days (range, 1-121 days). Among patients with CRS, tocilizumab, corticosteroids and siltuximab were used in 70%, 26% and 1% of cases, respectively. Neurologic adverse events (AEs) of any grade occurring after axi-cel infusion were reported in 181 (61%) patients. One patient was reported to die from cerebral edema. Additional information on neurologic AE severity will be presented. The median time to onset of any grade neurologic AEs was 6 days (range, 1-82 days), and 88% resolved by time of data submission with a median duration of 8 days (range, 1 to 105 days). Corticosteroids were used in 56% of patients for treatment. Patients ≥ 65 years had comparable CRS (85% vs 82%, p=0.62), grades ≥ 3 CRS (13% vs 9%, p=0.62), and neurologic AEs (68% vs 58%, p=0.13) vs patients < 65 years of age. Prolonged cytopenias (thrombocytopenia and neutropenia), as defined by an inability to recover within 30 days after the administration of axi-cel, occurred in 7% of patients. Preliminary data reveals 6 patients (2%) reported subsequent neoplasms: myelodysplasia (n=3), lung cancer (n=1), neuroendocrine tumor (n=1), and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (n=1); additional details, including pre-existing risk factors, will be addressed when the updated analysis is presented. Conclusion Post-approval axi-cel use reported in this registry study in the US, when compared to the registrational ZUMA-1 trial, includes a larger proportion of older patients, patients with transformed or double-hit lymphoma, and patients with a worse performance status. Despite these differences, best responses and toxicities are comparable to those reported for the ZUMA-1 trial. CRS severity assessment varied based on the grading method utilized, with a slightly higher rate of grade 3 CRS based on ASTCT Consensus Grading compared with Lee et al 2014. The safety and efficacy outcomes of patients ≥ 65 years at this early stage are comparable to those of younger patients, although further analysis with more follow-up is warranted. Disclosures Pasquini: Novartis: Research Funding; Kit Pharma: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory Board; Amgen: Consultancy; Medigene: Consultancy. Locke:Cellular BioMedicine Group Inc.: Consultancy; Kite: Other: Scientific Advisor; Novartis: Other: Scientific Advisor. Herrera:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding. Siddiqi:Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Speakers Bureau. Ghobadi:Celgene: Consultancy; Wugen: Consultancy; Kite Pharma a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; EUSA: Consultancy. Dong:Gilead Inc: Other: Own Stock; Kite Pharma: Employment. Nikiforow:Kite/Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; NKarta: Honoraria. Purdum:Kite Pharma: Employment. Horowitz:Sanofi: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Chimerix: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; CSL Behring: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Regeneron: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Kite Pharma/Gilead: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; GlaxoSmithKline: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Janssen: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Actinium: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Amgen: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Magenta: Consultancy, Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Mesoblast: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Miltenyi Biotech: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant, Research Funding; Oncoimmune: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Pharmacyclics: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Seattle Genetics: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant; Shire: Other: Unrestricted educational and research grant. Hooper:Kite Pharma Inc: Employment, Other: Owner Stock. Kawashima:Kite: Employment. Jacobson:Bayer: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding; Precision Biosciences: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Humanigen: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses.

International audience; Cyclophosphamide combined with total body irradiation (Cy/TBI) or busulfan (BuCy) are the most widely used myeloablative conditioning regimens for allotransplants. Recent data regarding their comparative effectiveness are lacking. We analyzed data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research for 1230 subjects receiving a first hematopoietic cell transplant from a human leukocyte antigen-matched sibling or from an unrelated donor during the years 2000 to 2006 for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) after conditioning with Cy/TBI or oral or intravenous (IV) BuCy. Multivariate analysis showed significantly less nonrelapse mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.86; P = .007), and relapse after, but not before, 1 year posttransplant (RR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.08-0.65; P = .006), and better leukemia-free survival (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55-0.88; P = .003) and survival (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.52-0.88; P = .003) in persons receiving IV, but not oral, Bu compared with TBI. In combination with Cy, IV Bu is associated with superior outcomes compared with TBI in patients with AML in first CR.

Purpose This clinical trial evaluated standard-dose radioimmunotherapy with a chemotherapy-based transplantation regimen followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation versus rituximab with the same regimen in patients with relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Patients and Methods Patients with chemotherapy-sensitive persistent or relapsed DLBCL were randomly assigned to receive iodine-131 tositumomab (dosimetric dose of 5 mCi on day −19 and therapeutic dose of 0.75 Gy on day −12), carmustine 300 mg/m2 (day −6), etoposide 100 mg/m2 twice daily (days −5 to −2), cytarabine 100 mg/m2 twice daily (days −5 to −2), and melphalan 140 mg/m2 (day −1; B-BEAM) or rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days −19 and −12 and the same chemotherapy regimen (R-BEAM). Results Two hundred twenty-four patients were enrolled, with 113 patients randomly assigned to R-BEAM and 111 patients assigned to B-BEAM. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates, the primary end point, were 48.6% (95% CI, 38.6% to 57.8%) for R-BEAM and 47.9% (95% CI, 38.2% to 57%; P = .94) for B-BEAM, and the 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 65.6% (95% CI, 55.3% to 74.1%) for R-BEAM and 61% (95% CI, 50.9% to 69.9%; P = .38) for B-BEAM. The 100-day treatment-related mortality rates were 4.1% (95% CI, 0.2% to 8.0%) for R-BEAM and 4.9% (95% CI, 0.8% to 9.0%; P = .97) for B-BEAM. The maximum mucositis score was higher in the B-BEAM arm (0.72) compared with the R-BEAM arm (0.31; P < .001). Conclusion The B-BEAM and R-BEAM regimens produced similar 2-year PFS and OS rates for patients with chemotherapy-sensitive relapsed DLBCL. No differences in toxicities other than mucositis were noted.

Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) is high after HLA-mismatched umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation (UCBT). In utero, exposure to noninherited maternal antigen (NIMA) is recognized by the fetus, which induces T regulator cells to that haplotype. It is plausible that UCBTs in which recipients are matched to donor NIMAs may alleviate some of the excess mortality associated with this treatment. To explore this concept, we used marginal matched-pair Cox regression analysis to compare outcomes in 48 NIMA-matched UCBTs (ie, the NIMA of the donor UCB unit matched to the patient) and in 116 non–NIMA-matched UCBTs. All patients had a hematologic malignancy and received a single UCB unit. Cases and controls were matched on age, disease, disease status, transplantation-conditioning regimen, HLA match, and infused cell dose. TRM was lower after NIMA-matched UCBTs compared with NIMA-mismatched UCBTs (relative risk, 0.48; P = .05; 18% versus 32% at 5 years posttransplantation). Consequently, overall survival was higher after NIMA-matched UCBT. The 5-year probability of overall survival was 55% after NIMA-matched UCBTs versus 38% after NIMA-mismatched UCBTs (P = .04). When faced with the choice of multiple HLA-mismatched UCB units containing adequate cell doses, selecting an NIMA-matched UCB unit may improve survival after mismatched UCBT.

BACKGROUND Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without complete remission (CR) or in first relapse (Rel1) can have extended leukemia control and survival after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). For patients in Rel1 or primary induction failure (PIF), transplantation versus treatment to achieve a second CR (CR2) and subsequent HCT might yield similar outcomes, but available comparative data are scarce. METHODS Survival was analyzed in 4682 HCT recipients according to disease status: PIF (N = 1440), Rel1 (failing ≥1 reinduction; N = 1256), and CR2 (N = 1986). RESULTS Patient, disease, and transplantation characteristics were similar, except that patients in CR2 more often had performance scores of 90% to 100%, de novo AML, and longer CR1 duration. Adverse cytogenetics were more common in patients who experienced PIF. The 5-year survival rate adjusted for performance score, cytogenetic risk, and donor type for CR2 was 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-41%) compared with 18% (95% CI, 16%-20%) for HCT in Rel1 and 21% (95% CI, 19%-23%) in PIF (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Although survival is superior for patients who undergo HCT in CR2, transplantation for selected patients in Rel1 or PIF may still be valuable. These data can guide decision making about additional salvage therapy versus prompt HCT for patients not in CR, but they also highlight that AML is intrinsically more treatable in patients who have favorable-risk cytogenetics, those with longer CR1 duration, and younger patients with better performance status. Cancer 2017;123:2025–2034. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

In the setting of myeloablative conditioning and conventional post-grafting immunoprophylaxis for GvHD with a calcineurin inhibitor and methotrexate, randomized studies of bone marrow (BM) vs peripheral blood (PB) as the allograft source in transplantation from HLA-matched related donors1 or unrelated donors2 showed comparable outcomes with the exception of an absolute increase of 6–15% in the incidence of chronic GvHD after transplantation of PB. However, in the setting of non-ablative conditioning, a recent retrospective study from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) showed that rates of acute GvHD, chronic GvHD and overall survival were similar after transplantation of BM compared with PB.3 To test whether outcomes were similar after haplo-BM and haplo-PB transplants using non-ablative conditioning with the Hopkins regimen,4 we compared data from a multi-center phase II trial of haplo-BM conducted in the US (Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 06035, 6) with published and unpublished data from phase II trials of haplo-PB transplants in the US, Europe and Australia7, 8, 9 by means of a matched-pair analysis. Patients 70 years of age or younger who met the eligibility criteria for BMT CTN 0603 were matched for age±10 years and for low-intermediate-high disease risk index (DRI). DRI is a composite of disease, disease status and cytogenetic risk (acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome) that has been shown to independently risk stratify survival in heterogeneous adult patient cohorts with hematologic malignancy regardless of conditioning intensity or graft source.10

Hematopoietic cell transplantation can cure many high-risk diseases but is associated with complexity, cost, and risk. Several areas in transplantation practice were identified in the 2014 Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network State of the Science Symposium (BMT CTN SOSS) as high priorities for further study. We developed a survey for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinicians to identify current practices in BMT CTN SOSS priority areas and to understand, more generally, the variation in approach to transplantation and estimation of transplantation benefit in current medical practice. Of 1439 transplantation clinicians surveyed, 305 responded (20% response rate). Clinicians were well represented by age, experience, geography, and size of practice. We found that several techniques identified in the BMT CTN SOSS, such as maintenance therapy for acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes after allogeneic transplantation, were already being utilized in practice on and off study, with higher rates of use in higher-volume centers. There was significant variation among clinicians in use of transplantation technologies and approaches to common transplantation scenarios. Appraisals of risks and benefits of transplantation appeared to converge upon similar estimates despite the presentation of different hypothetical scenarios. These results suggest overall equipoise in several BMT CTN SOSS high-priority areas and support the need for better data to inform clinical practice.

The increasing number of older adults with blood-related disorders and the introduction of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens has led to increases in hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation among older adults and a corresponding increase in the age of siblings who donate HSCs to these patients. Data regarding the donation-related experiences of older donors are lacking. The Related Donor Safety Study aimed to examine/compare health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of older versus younger HSC donors. Sixty peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors ages 18 to 60 years and 104 PBSC donors age60 years completed validated questionnaires before donation and 4 weeks and 1 year after donation. Before donation, older donors had poorer general physical health (t = -3.27; P = .001) but better mental health (t = 2.11; P .05). There were no age differences in multiple other donation-related factors. At 4 weeks after donation, there were no group differences in general physical/mental health, but older donors were less likely to report donation-related pain (t = -2.26; P .05) and concerns (t = -3.38; P = .001). At both 4 weeks and 1 year after donation, there were no significant differences in the percentage of each age group feeling physically back to normal or in the number of days it took donors to feel completely well. There was no evidence that increasing age within the older donor group was associated with poorer donation-related HRQoL. Taken together, these data support the current practice of HSC donation by sibling donors above age 60, providing no evidence of worsening HRQoL up to 1 year after donation in individuals up to age 76.

Data on 68 146 hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) (53% autologous and 47% allogeneic) gathered by 1566 teams from 77 countries and reported through their regional transplant organizations were analyzed by main indication, donor type and stem cell source for the year 2012. With transplant rates ranging from 0.1 to 1001 per 10 million inhabitants, more HSCTs were registered from unrelated 16 433 donors than related 15 493 donors. Grafts were collected from peripheral blood (66%), bone marrow (24%; mainly non-malignant disorders) and cord blood (10%). Compared with 2006, an increase of 46% total (57% allogeneic and 38% autologous) was observed. Growth was due to an increase in reporting teams (18%) and median transplant activity/team (from 38 to 48 HSCTs/team). An increase of 167% was noted in mismatched/haploidentical family HSCT. A Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) analysis revealed the global perspective of WBMT to be its major strength and identified potential to be the key professional body for patients and authorities. The limited data collection remains its major weakness and threat. In conclusion, global HSCT grows over the years without plateauing (allogeneic>autologous) and at different rates in the four World Health Organization regions. Major increases were observed in allogeneic, haploidentical HSCT and, to a lesser extent, in cord blood transplantation.

The diversity of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I and II alleles can be simplified by consolidating them into fewer supertypes based on functional or predicted structural similarities in epitope-binding grooves of HLA molecules. We studied the impact of matched and mismatched HLA-A (265 versus 429), -B (230 versus 92), -C (365 versus 349), and -DRB1 (153 versus 51) supertypes on clinical outcomes of 1934 patients with acute leukemias or myelodysplasia/myeloproliferative disorders. All patients were reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research following single-allele mismatched unrelated donor myeloablative conditioning hematopoietic cell transplantation. Single mismatched alleles were categorized into six HLA-A (A01, A01A03, A01A24, A02, A03, A24), six HLA-B (B07, B08, B27, B44, B58, B62), two HLA-C (C1, C2), and five HLA-DRB1 (DR1, DR3, DR4, DR5, DR9) supertypes. Supertype B mismatch was associated with increased risk of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (hazard ratio =1.78, P=0.0025) compared to supertype B match. Supertype B07-B44 mismatch was associated with a higher incidence of both grade II-IV (hazard ratio=3.11, P=0.002) and III-IV (hazard ratio=3.15, P=0.01) acute graft-versus-host disease. No significant associations were detected between supertype-matched versus -mismatched groups at other HLA loci. These data suggest that avoiding HLA-B supertype mismatches can mitigate the risk of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease in 7/8-mismatched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation when multiple HLA-B supertype-matched donors are available. Future studies are needed to define the mechanisms by which supertype mismatching affects outcomes after alternative donor hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Much research into the impact of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) on recipients' symptoms, functioning and health-related quality of life uses diverse patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Robust conclusions regarding PROs in HCT patients are constrained by methodological issues, including the use of multiple different and noncomparable assessment measures. We reviewed 114 publications addressing PROs in HCT patients. Although three multi-item measures were most frequently used (FACT-BMT, n=28; European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, n=26; and SF-36, n=26), 25 additional measures were used in more than one study. Another 50 measures were used in single studies. Over 50% of studies used more than one measure. We recommend that the field agrees upon a set of measures to address the core domains important to patients, to reduce heterogeneity and allow comparisons across studies and between different populations. Measures should be available in a free and easily accessible manner internationally. We discuss the relative benefits of the National Institutes of Health-supported Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) system to achieve these goals. To further address these issues, the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network has recently created a task force to implement PROMIS measures alongside traditional PRO measures in future clinical trials. Robust comparisons between measures in this setting may allow for the development of a standard for HCT patients.

Allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can induce long-term remissions in chemosensitive relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL). The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network conducted a multicenter phase 2 trial to examine the efficacy of alloHCT using reduced-intensity conditioning with rituximab (RTX) in multiply relapsed, chemosensitive FL. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS). The conditioning regimen consisted of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose RTX (FCR), in which 3 of the 4 doses of RTX were administered at a dose of 1 gm/m2. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was with tacrolimus and methotrexate. Sixty-five patients were enrolled and 62 were evaluable. Median age was 55 years (range, 29 to 74). This group was heavily pretreated: 77% had received ≥ 3 prior regimens, 32% had received ≥ 5 prior regimens, and 11% had received prior autologous HCT. Donors were HLA-matched siblings (n = 33) or HLA-matched unrelated adults (n = 29). No graft failures occurred. The overall response rate after HCT was 94% with 90% in complete remission (CR), including 24 patients not in CR before alloHCT. With a median follow-up of 47 months (range, 30 to 73), 3-year PFS and overall survival rates were 71% (95% confidence interval, 58% to 81%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 70% to 90%), respectively. Three-year cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality were 13% and 16%, respectively. Two-year cumulative incidences of grades 2 to 4 and grades 3 or 4 acute GVHD were 27% and 10%, respectively, and extensive chronic GVHD incidence was 55%. Serum RTX concentrations peaked at day +28 and remained detectable as late as 1 year in 59% of patients with available data. In conclusion, alloHCT with FCR conditioning confers high CR rates, a low incidence of relapse/progression, and excellent survival probabilities in heavily pretreated FL patients.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an emerging therapy for patients with severe autoimmune diseases (AID). We report data on 368 patients with AID who underwent HCT in 64 North and South American transplantation centers reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research between 1996 and 2009. Most of the HCTs involved autologous grafts (n = 339); allogeneic HCT (n = 29) was done mostly in children. The most common indications for HCT were multiple sclerosis, systemic sclerosis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. The median age at transplantation was 38 years for autologous HCT and 25 years for allogeneic HCT. The corresponding times from diagnosis to HCT were 35 months and 24 months. Three-year overall survival after autologous HCT was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81%-91%). Median follow-up of survivors was 31 months (range, 1-144 months). The most common causes of death were AID progression, infections, and organ failure. On multivariate analysis, the risk of death was higher in patients at centers that performed fewer than 5 autologous HCTs (relative risk, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.1-11.1; P = .03) and those that performed 5 to 15 autologous HCTs for AID during the study period (relative risk, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.5-11.7; P = .006) compared with patients at centers that performed more than 15 autologous HCTs for AID during the study period. AID is an emerging indication for HCT in the region. Collaboration of hematologists and other disease specialists with an outcomes database is important to promote optimal patient selection, analysis of the impact of prognostic variables and long-term outcomes, and development of clinical trials.

The number of allogeneic hematopoietic SCTs performed globally each year continues to increase, paralleled by an increased demand for donors of therapeutic cells. Donor characteristics and collection procedures have undergone major changes during recent decades, and further changes are foreseen. Information on short- and long-term donor outcomes is of crucial importance to ensure maximal donor safety and availability. Current data, predominantly from unrelated donors, give reliable information on the frequent early events associated with donation-most of them of mild-to-moderate intensity. Information on the type and relative risk of serious adverse reactions is more limited. Moreover, only few data exist on long-term donor outcome. On the basis of this need, recommendations for a minimum data set for prospective donor follow-up were developed in a workshop with the participation of an international group of investigators actively involved in allogeneic stem cell donation under the auspices of and approved by the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Establishment of a standardized global follow-up for both, related and unrelated, donors will enable monitoring of the short- and long-term safety profiles of hematopoietic cell donation and form a solid basis for future donor selection and counseling.

Excessive adverse events were encountered in a Phase I/II study of cyclophosphamide (CY) dose deescalation in a fludarabine-based conditioning regimen for bone marrow transplantation from unrelated donors in patients with severe aplastic anemia. All patients received fixed doses of antithymocyte globulin, fludarabine, and low-dose total body irradiation. The starting CY dose was 150 mg/kg, with deescalation to 100 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg, or 0 mg/kg. CY dose level 0 mg/kg was closed due to graft failure in 3 of 3 patients. CY dose level 150 mg/kg was closed due to excessive organ toxicity (n = 6) or viral pneumonia (n = 1), resulting in the death of 7 of 14 patients. CY dose levels 50 and 100 mg/kg remain open. Thus, CY at doses of 150 mg/kg in combination with total body irradiation (2 Gy), fludarabine (120 mg/m(2)), and antithymocyte globulin was associated with excessive organ toxicity.

Informed consent is essential to ethical research and is requisite to participation in clinical research. Yet most hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) informed consent forms (ICFs) are written at reading levels that are above the ability of the average person in the United States (U.S.). The recent development of ICF templates by the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and the National Heart Blood and Lung Institute have not resulted in increased patient comprehension of information. Barriers to creating Easy-to-Read ICFs that meet U.S. federal requirements and pass institutional review board (IRB) review are the result of multiple interconnected factors. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) formed an ad hoc review team to address concerns regarding the overall readability and length of ICFs used for BMT CTN trials. This paper summarizes recommendations of the review team for the development and formatting of Easy-to-Read ICFs for HCT multicenter clinical trials, the most novel of which is the use of a 2-column format. These recommendations intend to guide the ICF writing process, simplify local IRB review of the ICF, enhance patient comprehension, and improve patient satisfaction. The BMT CTN plans to evaluate the impact of the Easy-to-Read format compared with the traditional format on the informed consent process.

Objectives To examine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among sibling pediatric hematopoietic stem cell donors from predonation through 1 year postdonation, to compare donor-reported HRQoL scores with proxy-reports by parents/guardians and those of healthy norms, and to identify predonation factors (including donor age) potentially associated with postdonation HRQoL, to better understand the physical and psychosocial effects of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell donation. Study design A random sample of 105 pediatric donors from US centers and a parent/guardian were interviewed by telephone predonation and 4 weeks and 1 year postdonation. The interview included sociodemographic, psychosocial, and HRQoL items. A sample of healthy controls matched to donors by age, gender, and race/ethnicity was generated. Results Key findings included (1) approximately 20% of donors at each time point had very poor HRQoL; (2) child self-reported HRQoL was significantly lower than parent proxy-reported HRQoL at all 3 time points and significantly lower than that of norms at predonation and 4 weeks postdonation; and (3) younger children were at particular risk of poor HRQoL. Conclusions Additional research to identify the specific sources of poorer HRQoL among at-risk donors (eg, the donation experience vs having a chronically ill sibling) and the reasons that parents may be overestimating HRQoL in their donor children is critical and should lead to interventions and policy changes that ensure positive experiences for these minor donors.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative treatment, albeit in a minority of patients with accelerated (AP) or blast phase (BP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Imatinib (IM) has transient but significant activity in advanced phases of CML, which may permit early allografting for responding patients. To identify prognostic factors in allograft recipients previously treated with IM, we analyzed 449 allogeneic HSCT performed between 1999–2004 in advanced phase CML using data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research. CML patients in second chronic phase (CP2, n=184), AP (n=185), and BP (n=80) received HLA-identical sibling (27%), related (3%), or matched or mismatched unrelated donor (70%), peripheral blood (47%) or bone marrow (53%) HSCT after myeloablative (78%) or non-myeloablative (22%) conditioning. 52% in CP2, 49% in AP, and 46% in BP received IM pre-HSCT. Disease-free survival was 35–40% for CP2, 26–27% for AP and 8–11% for BP. Cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD and TRM were not affected by stages of CML or pre-HSCT IM exposure. Multivariate analyses showed that conventional prognostic indicators remain the strongest determinants of transplant outcomes. In conclusion, there are no new prognostic indicators of outcomes of allogeneic HSCT for advanced phase CML in the IM era.

Several risk factors are associated with increased mortality in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD), but there is considerable variability in the reported factors. Therefore, we evaluated patient, transplantation, and cGVHD characteristics to develop a risk score in 5343 patients with cGVHD. Ten variables were identified as being significant in multivariate analysis of overall survival and nonrelapse mortality (NRM): age, prior acute GVHD, time from transplantation to cGVHD, donor type, disease status at transplantation, GVHD prophylaxis, gender mismatch, serum bilirubin, Karnofsky score, and platelet count. These 10 variables were used to build a cGVHD risk score, and 6 risk groups (RGs) were identified. The 5-year NRM was 5% (1%-9%) in RG1, 20% (19%-23%) in RG2, 33% (29%-37%) in RG3, 43% (40%-46%) in RG4, 63% (53%-74%) in RG5, and 72% (59%-85%) in RG6. The 5-year overall survival was highest at 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]:85%-97%) in RG1, followed by 67% (65%-69%) in RG2, 51% (46%-55%) in RG3, 40% (37%-43%) in RG4, 21% (12%-30%) in RG5, and 4% (0%-9%) in RG6 (all P < .01). This analysis demonstrates the usefulness of data from a large registry to develop risk-score categories for major transplantation outcomes. Validation of this cGVHD risk score is needed in a different population to ensure its broad applicability.

Although recent advances in therapy offer the promise for improving survival in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA), the small size of the patient population, lack of a mechanism in North America for longitudinal follow-up of patients and inadequate cooperation among hematologists, scientists, and transplant physicians remain obstacles to conducting large studies that would advance the field. In order to address this issue, the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) convened a group of international experts in March 2010 to define the most important questions in the basic science, immunosuppressive therapy (IST), and bone marrow transplantation (BMT) of SAA and propose initiatives to facilitate clinical and biologic research. Key conclusions of the working group were: 1) new patients should obtain accurate, expert diagnosis and early identification of biological risk; 2) a population-based SAA outcomes registry should be established in North America to collect data on patients longitudinally from diagnosis through and after treatment; 3) a repository of biologic samples linked to the clinical data in the outcomes registry should be developed; 4) innovative approaches to unrelated donor BMT that decrease graft vs. host disease are needed, and 5) alternative donor transplantation approaches for patients lacking HLA-matched unrelated donors must be improved. A partnership of BMT, IST and basic science researchers will develop initiatives and partner with advocacy and funding organizations in order to address these challenges. Collaboration with similar study groups in Europe and Asia will be pursued.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem-cell disorders that result in varying degrees of cytopenia and risk of transformation into acute leukemia. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) is the only known cure for this disease. The treatment is routinely used for younger patients, but only a minority of patients older than the age of 60 undergo this procedure. The overall MDS incidence is 3.3 per 100,000, but the incidence in patients older than age 70 is between 15 and 50 per 100,000. The median age at presentation is 76 years. Medicare-age patients 65 or older represent 80% of the total population receiving an MDS diagnosis. In the United States, one of the obstacles to SCT for older patients with MDS has been lack of third party reimbursement. On August 4, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released their Decision Memo for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Myelodysplastic Syndrome. This memo states: “Allogeneic HSCT for MDS is covered by Medicare only for beneficiaries with MDS participating in an approved clinical study that meets the criteria below…. ” In this review, we will summarize what is known regarding the role of allogeneic SCT in older patients as well as other elements that should be included within clinical trials that can provide the evidence necessary to demonstrate that allogeneic SCT should be a covered benefit for Medicare beneficiaries.

Risks of secondary solid cancers among allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients who receive conditioning without total body irradiation are not well known. We evaluated the incidence and risk factors for solid cancers after HCT using high-dose busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning in 4318 recipients of first allogeneic HCT for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission (N = 1742) and chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase (N = 2576). Our cohort represented 22 041 person-years at risk. Sixty-six solid cancers were reported at a median of 6 years after HCT. The cumulative-incidence of solid cancers at 5 and 10 years after HCT was 0.6% and 1.2% among acute myeloid leukemia and 0.9% and 2.4% among chronic myeloid leukemia patients. In comparison to general population incidence rates, HCT recipients had 1.4× higher than expected rate of invasive solid cancers (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.79, P = .01). Significantly elevated risks were observed for tumors of the oral cavity, esophagus, lung, soft tissue, and brain. Chronic graft-versus-host disease was an independent risk factor for all solid cancers, and especially cancers of the oral cavity. Recipients of allogeneic HCT using busulfan-cyclophosphamide conditioning are at risk for developing solid cancers. Their incidence continues to increase with time, and lifelong cancer surveillance is warranted in this population.

Patients with severe aplastic anemia who do not have a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling generally receive immunosuppressive therapy as a first-line therapy, with allogeneic transplantation being reserved for those who do not have an adequate sustained response. Barriers to the use of unrelated-donor transplantation for aplastic anemia include identifying a suitable alternative donor, and risks of graft failure, regimen-related toxicity, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Despite the more than 14 million adults registered with donor registries worldwide, only approximately 50% of patients of Caucasian descent will have an available and fully HLA-matched unrelated adult donor; the rate is substantially lower for non-Caucasians. While umbilical cord blood allows transplantation with greater donor-recipient HLA disparity (without excessive risk of GVHD), risks of graft failure and transplant-related mortality are higher than after transplantation of adult donor grafts. Among patients with a suitable donor, recent changes in pre-transplant conditioning regimens have lowered the risks of organ toxicity and graft failure. Although advances in donor HLA typing and selection practices and improved GVHD prophylaxis have lowered the risk, GVHD remains an important obstacle to long-term symptom-free survival. Despite these limitations, unrelated-donor transplantation offers the best chance of long-term survival for many patients in whom current immunosuppression strategies are not effective. Wider applicability of alternative-donor transplantation for aplastic anemia will require better approaches to prevent graft failure and GVHD and to expand the pool of unrelated-donor grafts. This includes exploring strategies to effectively use alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood.

Requests for participation of unrelated stem cell donors in research transplant protocols are becoming more frequent. World Marrow Donor Association calls on donor registries to participate in research activities. Here, we discuss various implications of research participation and make some recommendations as how to make this possible.

Myelofibrosis is a myeloproliferative disorder incurable with conventional strategies. Several small series have reported long-term disease-free survival (DSF) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In this study, we analyze the outcomes of 289 patients receiving allogeneic transplantation for primary myelofibrosis between 1989 and 2002, from the database of the Center for International Bone Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR). The median age was 47 years (range: 18-73 years). Donors were HLA identical siblings in 162 patients, unrelated individuals in 101 patients, and HLA nonidentical family members in 26 patients. Patients were treated with a variety of conditioning regimens and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis regimens. Splenectomy was performed in 65 patients prior to transplantation. The 100-day treatment-related mortality was 18% for HLA identical sibling transplants, 35% for unrelated transplants, and 19% for transplants from alternative related donors. Corresponding 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 37%, 30%, and 40%, respectively. DFS rates were 33%, 27%, and 22%, respectively. DFS for patients receiving reduced-intensity transplants was comparable: 39% for HLA identical sibling donors and 17% for unrelated donors at 3 years. In this large retrospective series, allogeneic transplantation for myelofibrosis resulted in long-term relapse-free survival (RFS) in about one-third of patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 358-367 (2010)

Background. There is no hierarchical algorithm that weights the characteristics of individual donors against each other in a quantitative manner to facilitate donor selection when multiple potential equally HLA-matched unrelated donors (URD) are available. Donor factors, such as age, sex, CMV status, ABO type, and matching of secondary HLA loci (DQB1, DPB1), have been associated with recipient survival in URD hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) although the impact of specific factors has varied among studies. The goal of this study was to develop and validate a donor selection score that prioritizes donor characteristics associated with better survival in 8/8 HLA-matched URD transplantation. Methods. Two large CIBMTR patient datasets were studied: HCT from 1999-2011 (n=5952) and 2012-2014 (n=4510). Patients were adults (>18), transplanted for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Each dataset was randomly split for the analysis. Cohort 1 (c1): 2/3 (n=3969) for modeling/score development (training) and 1/3 (n=1983) for testing and similarly for cohort 2 (c2): 2/3 (n=3051) and 1/3 (n=1459). Thus, two independent models were built and tested, adjusting for significant patient characteristics associated with survival. Interactions between donor characteristics, and donor and recipient characteristics were tested. The following donor characteristics were considered for the donor score: HLA-DQB1 matching, HLA-DPB1 matching (using the T-cell epitope matching categorization), age, sex matching, parity, CMV matching, ABO matching and race matching. Results. In the final survival model (training set from 1999-2011, c1) we found significant negative associations with survival for three donor risk factors: non-permissive DPB1 matching (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01, 1.26; p-value=0.032), older donor age (as a linear effect, HR 1.07 per decade increase in age; 95% CI 1.02, 1.12, p-value=0.004), and CMV mismatching for CMV+ recipients (HR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02, 1.27; p-value=0.022). For CMV- recipients, a CMV+ donor was not significantly associated with an increase in mortality (HR=1.03; 95% CI 0.89-1.20; p-value=0.68), so this was not included in the score. ABO mismatching (any type: major, minor or bidirectional) was associated with mortality in initial modelling, but the effect was not present in more recent transplants (HR for ABO mismatch among patients transplanted since 2007: 1.04; 95% CI 0.91-1.19; p-value=0.638), so it was not included in the final model and donor score. Based on these results a donor risk score was constructed, however this score was not validated in the testing set (c1), nor were any of the individual component donor factors significantly associated with worse overall survival. In the second cohort (c2), only donor age was significantly associated with worse survival, and it validated in the independent test set from c2. Since donor age was significant in 3 of the 4 cohorts, we quantified the impact of donor age in the validation set of the most recent cohort, c2. We found that choosing a donor 2, 5, 10 or 20 years older was associated with a 1%, 2%, 3% or 7% decrease in 2 year OS, adjusted for patient characteristics. Conclusion. Despite data on over 10,000 URD transplants, we were unable to develop a valid donor selection score. The only donor characteristic associated with better survival was younger age, with 2-year survival being 3% better when a donor is 10 years younger. We did not test other endpoints; it is possible that separate scores could be generated to predict the risk of other outcomes (e.g. graft failure, graft-versus-host disease), however, unless the adverse donor characteristics are identical for these outcomes, centers will still have to prioritize the various donor characteristics to select from a pool of potential donors. This large data set shows that none of the other easily available donor clinical and genetic factors tested were reproducibly associated with survival and hence, flexibility in selecting URD based on these characteristics is justified. These data support a simplified URD selection process and have significant implications for URD registries. Disclosures Porter: Incyte: Honoraria; Genentech/Roche: Employment, Other: Family member employment, stock ownship - family member; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel reimbursement; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Immunovative Therapies: Other: Member DSMB. Lee: Amgen: Other: One-time advisory board member; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Other: One-time advisory board member; Mallinckrodt: Honoraria; Kadmon: Other: One-time advisory board member.

With increasing use of high dose chemotherapy with autologous and allogeneic transplants the need for the transplant physician workforce requires reassessment. The types of transplants and patients are also shifting toward transplants being done in patients with more comorbidities and more commonly these types of patients require more work effort per patient from the transplant physician. Additionally, HSCT survivors often require ongoing care at the transplant center due to the inability of the primary care workforce or the hematology/oncology workforce to absorb caring for post complex post transplant patients. The adult transplant workforce has had very few physicians join under age 40. Nearly 50% of adult transplant physicians are over age 50 whereas only 28% of pediatric transplant physicians are over age 50. By 2020, it is projected that we will need 1,264 new adult transplant physicians and 94 pediatric transplant physicians. Training time for a physician is approximately 15 years. The capping of both medical school slots and residency slots since the early ’80s is now having a very big impact on supply, but other factors are also affecting supplies such as generational differences, lifestyle expectations, and the change of the medical workforce from being mostly men. Workforce shortages are being reported for many specialities. Workforce problems are also present for nurses, pharmacists and medical technologists. So increasing use of general internists and mid-level providers may not exist as a solution. Transplant physicians must be actively engaged in the medical education process to show young medical students and residents who are not committed to another sub specialty career the excitement and challenges of a career in bone marrow transplantation, so that our field will have providers for the future.

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is widely used to treat patients with a range of haematological and non-haematological disorders. Both bone marrow and peripheral blood stem cell collection are associated with morbidity and, very rarely, mortality. We investigated the information that exists to adequately inform donors about the relative merits of each procedure. We carried out a systematic review analysing data from six prospective randomised controlled trials of related donors and discuss here the merits and drawbacks of this approach. Registry data mostly describes patient outcome but stem cell donor registries collect and report information on unrelated donors which could easily be extended to related donors. Further well-designed, randomised studies are required.

We report outcomes of 932 recipients of unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell hematopoietic cell transplantation (URD-PBSC HCT) for acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndrome enrolled on a prospective National Marrow Donor Program trial from 1999 through 2003. Preparative regimens included myeloablative (MA; N = 611), reduced-intensity (RI; N = 160), and nonmyeloablative (NMA; N = 161). For MA recipients, CD34+ counts greater than 3.8 × 106/kg improved neutrophil and platelet engraftment, whereas improved overall survival (OS) and reduced transplant-related mortality (TRM) were seen for all preparative regimens when CD34+ cell doses exceeded 4.5 × 106/kg. Higher infused doses of CD34+ cell dose did not result in increased rates of either acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Three-year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) of recipients of MA, RI, and NMA approaches were similar (33%, 35%, and 32% OS; 33%, 30%, and 29% DFS, respectively). In summary, recipients of URD-PBSC HCT receiving preparative regimens differing in intensity experienced similar survival. Higher CD34+ cell doses resulted in more rapid engraftment, less TRM, and better 3-year OS (39% versus 25%, MA, P = .004; 38% versus 21% RI/NMA, P = .004) but did not increase the risk of GVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00785525.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is the primary limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Corticosteroids remain the standard initial therapy, yet only 25% to 41% of patients completely respond. This randomized, 4-arm, phase 2 trial was designed to identify the most promising agent(s) for initial therapy for aGVHD. Patients were randomized to receive methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg per day plus etanercept, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), denileukin diftitox (denileukin), or pentostatin. Patients (n = 180) were randomized; their median age was 50 years (range, 7.5-70 years). Myeloablative conditioning represented 66% of transplants. Grafts were peripheral blood (61%), bone marrow (25%), or umbilical cord blood (14%); 53% were from unrelated donors. Patients who received MMF for prophylaxis (24%) were randomized to a non-MMF arm. At randomization, aGVHD was grade I to II (68%), III to IV (32%), and (53%) had visceral organ involvement. Day 28 complete response rates were etanercept 26%, MMF 60%, denileukin 53%, and pentostatin 38%. Corresponding 9-month overall survival was 47%, 64%, 49%, and 47%, respectively. Cumulative incidences of severe infections were as follows: etanercept 48%, MMF 44%, denileukin 62%, and pentostatin 57%. Efficacy and toxicity data suggest the use of MMF plus corticosteroids is the most promising regimen to compare against corticosteroids alone in a definitive phase 3 trial. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00224874.

Summary Prior therapy with rituximab might attenuate disparate histocompatibility antigen presentation by B cells, thus decreased the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and improved survival. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the outcomes of 435 B-cell lymphoma patients who received allogeneic transplantation from 1999 to 2004 in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database: 179 subjects who received rituximab within 6 months prior to transplantation (RTX cohort) and 256 subjects who did not receive RTX within 6 months prior to transplantation (No-RTX cohort). The RTX cohort had a significantly lower incidence of treatment-related mortality (TRM) [relative risk (RR) = 0·68; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0·47–1·0; P = 0·05], lower acute grade II–IV (RR = 0·72; 95% CI, 0·53–0·97; P = 0·03) and III–IV GVHD (RR = 0·55; 95% CI, 0·34–0·91; P = 0·02). There was no difference in the risk of chronic GVHD, disease progression or relapse. Progression-free survival (PFS) (RR = 0·68; 95% CI 0·50–0·92; P = 0·01) and overall survival (OS) (RR = 0·63; 95% CI, 0·46–0·86; P = 0·004) were significantly better in the RTX cohort. Prior RTX therapy correlated with less acute GVHD, similar chronic GVHD, less TRM, better PFS and OS.

Limited data are available describing donor adverse events (AEs) associated with filgrastim mobilized peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collections in unrelated volunteers. We report results in 2408 unrelated PBSC donors prospectively evaluated by the National Marrow Donor Program (NMDP) between 1999 and 2004. Female donors had higher rates of AEs, requiring central line placement more often (17% vs 4%, P < .001), experiencing more apheresis-related AEs (20% vs 7%, P < .001), more bone pain (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49), and higher rates of grades II-IV and III-IV CALGB AEs (OR = 2.22 and 2.32). Obese donors experienced more bone pain (obese vs normal, OR = 1.73) and heavy donors had higher rates of CALGB toxicities (> 95 kg vs < 70 kg, OR = 1.49). Six percent of donors experienced grade III-IV CALGB toxicities and 0.6% experienced toxicities that were considered serious and unexpected. Complete recovery is universal, however, and no late AEs attributable to donation have been identified. In conclusion, PBSC collection in unrelated donors is generally safe, but nearly all donors will experience bone pain, 1 in 4 will have significant headache, nausea, or citrate toxicity, and a small percentage will experience serious short-term adverse events. In addition, women and larger donors are at higher risk for donation-related AEs.

Purpose Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells from an unrelated donor (URD) is an option for many patients who do not have an HLA-identical sibling donor (MSD). Current criteria for the selection of URDs include consideration for HLA alleles determined by high resolution typing methods, with preference for allele-matched donors. However, the utility and outcome associated with transplants from URDs compared with those from MSDs remains undefined. Patients and Methods We examined clinical outcome after patients received bone marrow transplants (BMTs) from MSDs; HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1 allele-matched URDs (8/8); and HLA-mismatched URDs in a homogeneous population of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in first chronic phase (CP1) where a strong allogeneic effect and hence a lower risk of relapse is anticipated. Transplantation outcomes were compared between 1,052 URD and 3,514 MSD BMT recipients with CML in CP1. Results Five-year overall survival and leukemia-free survival (LFS) after receipt of BMTs from 8/8 matched URDs were worse than those after receipt of BMTs from MSDs (5-year survival, 55% v 63%; RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.56; P < .001; LFS, 50% v 55%; RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.40; P = .006). Survival was progressively worse with greater degrees of mismatch. Similar and low risk of relapse were observed after receipt of transplant from either MSD or URD. Conclusion In this homogeneous cohort of good risk patients with CML in CP1, 5-year overall survival and LFS after receipt of transplant from 8/8 allele-matched donors were modestly though significantly worse than those after receipt of transplant from MSDs. Additive adverse effects of multilocus mismatching are not well tolerated and should be avoided if possible.

Background: When comparing treatments for a specific illness, it is sometimes impractical or impossible to conduct a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Biological assignment trials are one alternative design. In hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) trials, a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor is considered optimal, but such donors are available for only 20—30% of otherwise eligible patients. Rather than randomizing only those with a matched sibling donor, in a recent multiple myeloma trial, the type of HCT each patient received was biologically based, i.e., chosen according to whether or not the patient had a matched sibling donor. Purpose: This article describes the design and implementation of biological assignment trials as well as their advantages and disadvantages. Methods: We focus on several aspects of such trials, including efficiency of trial duration, ethical issues, and potential sources of bias. Statistical issues are considered including sample size calculations, monitoring for biased enrollment, and adjustments for imbalances in patient characteristics. A multiple myeloma trial is used as an illustration. Results: Although they often require a larger sample size, biological assignment trials can provide substantial efficiency in terms of study duration over randomized trials when accrual to a randomized trial would be slow. Determination of sample size requires consideration of the anticipated proportion of patients with a biologically favored (HLA-matched sibling) donor. An add-on randomization of patients without a matched sibling donor may alleviate ethical concerns about applicability of study results to all patients regardless of whether the biological assignment groups differ with respect to outcome. Limitations: Prognostic factor imbalance and enrollment bias can occur in a biological assignment trial. Statistical adjustment for potential imbalance in prognostic factors is important, as is monitoring center accrual for enrollment bias and performing an appropriate intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions: A biological assignment trial can be a reasonable way to compare treatments which are biologically based, such as HLA-matched sibling transplants, when the gold-standard randomized trial design is impractical or impossible. Implementing such a trial requires careful consideration of the ethical issues and potential biases.

To compare the clinical outcomes of older (age ≥55 years) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients with younger NHL patients (

Imatinib mesylate (IM, Gleevec) has largely supplanted allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) as first line therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Nevertheless, many people with CML eventually undergo HCT, raising the question of whether prior IM therapy impacts HCT success. Data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research on 409 subjects treated with IM before HCT (IM+) and 900 subjects who did not receive IM before HCT (IM−) were analyzed. Among patients in first chronic phase, IM therapy before HCT was associated with better survival but no statistically significant differences in treatment-related mortality, relapse, and leukemia-free survival. Better HLA-matched donors, use of bone marrow, and transplantation within one year of diagnosis were also associated with better survival. A matched-pairs analysis was performed and confirmed a higher survival rate among first chronic phase patients receiving IM. Among patients transplanted with advanced CML, use of IM before HCT was not associated with treatment-related mortality, relapse, leukemia-free survival, or survival. Acute graft-versus-host disease rates were similar between IM+ and IM− groups regardless of leukemia phase. These results should be reassuring to patients receiving IM before HCT.

The best unrelated donors (URD) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are alleles matched at HLA-A, -B, -C, and DRB1. Earlier studies mostly used incomplete or lower resolution HLA typing for analysis of transplant outcome. To understand the impact of incomplete HLA characterization, we analyzed 14,797 URD HCT (1995-2006) using multivariable regression modeling adjusting for factors affecting survival. Of 21 matching cohorts, we identified 3 groups with significantly different outcomes. Well-matched cases had either no identified HLA mismatch and informative data at 4 loci or allele matching at HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 (n = 7477, 50% of the population). Partially matched pairs had a defined, single-locus mismatch and/or missing HLA data (n = 4962, 34%). Mismatched cases had ≥2 allele or antigen mismatches (n = 2358, 16%). Multivariate adjusted 5-year survival estimates were: well-matched: 54.1 (95% confidence interval), 52.9-55.4), partially matched: 43.7 (42.3-45.2), and mismatched: 33.4 (32.5-36.5), P < .001. A better matched donor yielded 10%-11% better 5-year survival. Importantly, intermediate resolution -A, -B, and -DRB1 alleles matched “6/6 antigen matched” HCT had survival outcomes within the partially matched cohort. We suggest that these proposed HLA subgroupings be used when complete HLA typing is not available. This improved categorization of HLA matching status allows adjustment for donor-recipient HLA compatibility, and can standardize interpretations of prior URD HCT experience.

Healthcare policies regarding hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) must address the need for the procedure as well as the availability of stem cell sources: bone marrow, peripheral blood, or umbilical cord blood (UCB). However, data with respect to the lifetime probability of undergoing HSCT are lacking. This study was undertaken to estimate the latter probability in the United States (U.S.), depending on age, sex, and race. We used data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program, and the U.S. Census Bureau and calculated probabilities as cumulative incidences. Several scenarios were considered: assuming current indications for autologous and allogeneic HSCT, assuming universal donor availability, and assuming broadening of HSCT use in hematologic malignancies. Incidences of diseases treated with HSCT and of HSCTs performed increase with age, rising strongly after age 40. Among individuals older than 40, incidences are higher for men than for women. The lifetime probabilities of undergoing HSCT range from 0.23% to 0.98% under the various scenarios. We conclude that, given current indications, the lifetime probability of undergoing autologous or allogeneic HSCT is much higher than previously reported by others and could rise even higher with increases in donor availability and HSCT applicability.

We studied the role of HLA-matched sibling hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in treating t(8;21) acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first remission. Outcomes of 118 patients receiving HCT and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research were compared with 132 similar patients receiving chemotherapy selected from 8 German AML Intergroup multicenter trials. Characteristics of the cohorts were similar except that chemotherapy recipients were significantly older. To adjust for time to treatment bias, outcomes were compared using left-truncated Cox regression models. Transplants were associated with higher treatment-related mortality (TRM; relative risk [RR] 6.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.95-15.45, P < .001), lower relapse (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.25-0.85, P = .01), and similar relapse-free survival (P = .2). Loss of sex chromosomes (LOS) in addition to t(8;21) had a negative impact on overall survival (OS) in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients without LOS experienced shorter survival after HCT comparing to chemotherapy (RR 3.05, P = .02), whereas patients with LOS had similar survival regardless of postremission therapy. In both cohorts, white blood cell count (WBC) at diagnosis >25 × 109/L was associated with a higher relapse risk (RR = 2.09, P = .03), lower relapse-free (RR = 1.9, P = .008), and OS (RR = 1.91, P = .01). In this cohort of patients with t(8;21) AML, HCT did not improve OS, because reduction of relapse was offset by high TRM. In the group without LOS, survival after chemotherapy was far superior to HCT. These results suggest that patients with t(8;21) AML without poor prognostic factors have higher rates of survival after chemotherapy as a post remission therapy compared to HCT.

For adults with high-risk or recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who lack a suitable sibling donor, the decision between autologous (Auto) and unrelated donor (URD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is difficult due to variable risks of relapse and treatment-related mortality (TRM). We analyzed data from two transplant registries to determine outcomes between Auto and URD HSCT for 260 adult ALL patients in first (CR1) or second (CR2) complete remission. All patients received a myeloablative conditioning regimen. The median follow-up was 77 (range 12-170) months. TRM at 1 year post-transplant was significantly higher with URD HSCT; however, there were minimal differences in TRM according to disease status. Relapse was higher with Auto HSCT and was increased in patients transplanted in CR2. Five year leukemia-free (37% vs. 39%) and overall (38% vs. 39%) survival rates were similar for Auto HSCT vs. URD HSCT in CR1. There were trends favoring URD HSCT in CR2. The long follow-up in this analysis demonstrated that either Auto or URD HSCT can result in long-term leukemia free and overall survival for adult ALL patients. The optimal time (CR1 vs. CR2) and technique to perform HSCT remains an important clinical question for adult ALL patients.

Outcomes of hematopoietic cell transplantation are steadily improving. New techniques have reduced transplant toxicities, and there are new sources of hematopoietic stem cells from unrelated donors. In June 2007 the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network convened a State of the Science Symposium of more than 200 participants in Ann Arbor to identify the most compelling clinical research opportunities in the field. This report summarizes the symposium's discussions and identifies eleven high priority clinical trials that the network plans to pursue over the course of the next several years.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) accounts for increased morbidity and mortality after HLA-identical unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To test the hypothesis that the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) encodes functional variation other than the classical HLA genes, we measured risks associated with donor-recipient MHC microsatellite (Msat) marker mismatching in 819 HCT recipients and their HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1 allele-matched unrelated donors. Suggestive trends of association with transplant outcome were observed for 5 Msats. Donor-recipient mismatching for the extended class I D6S105, class III D6S2787, and class II D6S2749 markers was each associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.71; P = .03; hazard ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.53; P = .02; hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.72; P = .007, respectively) whereas mismatching for the class I D6S2811 marker was associated with a decreased risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.98; P = .03). Mismatching for the class I D6S265 marker was associated with a decreased risk of grades III-IV acute GVHD (odds ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.98; P = .04). These results suggest that Msats may be informative for mapping MHC-resident genetic variation of clinical importance in HCT.

The application of unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation can be expanded with the use of mismatched donors if human leukocyte antigen (HLA) disparity does not lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The rules that govern permissibility of HLA mismatches are not well defined. The International Histocompatibility Working Group in hematopoietic cell transplantation measured the risks associated with locus-specific disparity in 4796 patients transplanted for low, intermediate, or high-risk hematologic diseases. The permissibility of a given HLA mismatch is in part defined by the locus and by disease risk.

Microsatellites (Msats) are effective markers for disease association mapping. The International Histocompatibility Working Group in hematopoietic cell transplantation applied Msats to determine whether potential new transplantation determinants are encoded within the major histocompatibility complex. Retrospective analysis of human leukocyte antigen-identical unrelated donor transplants provided a homogeneous population to measure Msat-associated risks of mortality.

The addition of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) to a regimen of high-dose cyclophosphamide has been advocated to enhance engraftment after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA). In a prospective clinical trial, 134 patients were randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide alone or in combination with ATG. All patients received T-cell–replete bone marrow from an HLA-matched sibling. With a median follow-up of 6 years, the 5-year probabilities of survival were 74% for the cyclophosphamide alone group and 80% for the cyclophosphamide plus ATG group (P = .44). Graft failure and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) rates were similar in both groups. With the survival rates achieved, this study is not adequately powered to detect significant differences between the 2 treatment groups. In conclusion, the results of allogeneic BMT for SAA have improved over time related to advances in supportive care. The addition of ATG to the preparative regimen did not significantly improve the outcome.

Purpose Long-term survival rates for older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are extremely low. Previous observational studies suggest that allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) may improve overall survival (OS) because of lower rates of relapse. We sought to prospectively determine the value of HSCT for older patients with AML in first complete remission. Patients and Methods We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II study to assess the efficacy of reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT for patients between the ages of 60 and 74 years with AML in first complete remission. The primary end point was disease-free survival at 2 years after HSCT. Secondary end points included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), relapse, and OS. Results In all, 114 patients with a median age of 65 years received transplantations. The majority (52%) received transplantations from unrelated donors and were given antithymocyte globulin for GVHD prophylaxis. Disease-free survival and OS at 2 years after transplantation were 42% (95% CI, 33% to 52%) and 48% (95% CI, 39% to 58%), respectively, for the entire group and 40% (95% CI, 29% to 55%) and 50% (95% CI, 38% to 64%) for the unrelated donor group. NRM at 2 years was 15% (95% CI, 8% to 21%). Grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD occurred in 9.6% (95% CI, 4% to 15%) of patients, and chronic GVHD occurred in 28% (95% CI, 19% to 36%) of patients. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 44% (95% CI, 35% to 53%). Conclusion Reduced-intensity conditioning HSCT to maintain remission in selected older patients with AML is relatively well tolerated and appears to provide superior outcomes when compared with historical patients treated without HSCT. GVHD and NRM rates were lower than expected. Future transplantation studies in these patients should focus on further reducing the risk of relapse.

There are >24 million registered adult donors, and the numbers of unrelated donor transplantations are increasing. The optimal strategy for prioritizing among comparably HLA-matched potential donors has not been established. Therefore, the objective of the current analyses was to study the association between donor characteristics (age, sex, parity, cytomegalovirus serostatus, HLA match, and blood group ABO match) and survival after transplantation for hematologic malignancy. The association of donor characteristics with transplantation outcomes was examined using either logistic or Cox regression models, adjusting for patient disease and transplantation characteristics associated with outcomes in 2 independent datasets: 1988 to 2006 (N = 6349; training cohort) and 2007 to 2011 (N = 4690; validation cohort). All donor-recipient pairs had allele-level HLA typing at HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1, which is the current standard for selecting donors. Adjusting for patient disease and transplantation characteristics, survival was better after transplantation of grafts from young donors (aged 18-32 years) who were HLA matched to recipients (P < .001). These findings were validated for transplantations that occurred between 2007 and 2011. For every 10-year increment in donor age, there is a 5.5% increase in the hazard ratio for overall mortality. Increasing HLA disparity was also associated with worsening survival. Donor age and donor-recipient HLA match are important when selecting adult unrelated donors. Other donor characteristics such as sex, parity, and cytomegalovirus serostatus were not associated with survival. The effect of ABO matching on survival is modest and must be studied further before definitive recommendations can be offered.