151. Tipifarnib as maintenance therapy did not improve disease-free survival in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia at high risk of relapse: Results of the phase III randomized E2902 trial.
- Author
-
Luger SM, Wang VX, Rowe JM, Litzow MR, Paietta E, Ketterling RP, Lazarus H, Rybka WB, Craig MD, Karp J, Cooper BW, Makary AZ, Kaminer LS, Appelbaum FR, Larson RA, and Tallman MS
- Subjects
- Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute drug therapy, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local drug therapy, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local pathology, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Salvage Therapy, Survival Rate, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality, Maintenance Chemotherapy mortality, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local mortality, Quinolones therapeutic use
- Abstract
Purpose: Despite the achievement of complete remission with chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), relapse is common and the majority of patients will die of their disease. Patients who achieve a remission after refractory or relapsed disease as well as elderly patients have a very high rate of relapse even if they achieve a complete remission. A phase 3 randomized ECOG-ACRIN-led intergroup study was conducted to determine whether post-remission therapy with the farnesyl transferase inhibitor, tipifarnib (R115777), improved the disease-free survival (DFS) of adult patients with AML in complete remission (CR), at high risk for relapse., Patients and Methods: Adult patients with AML in remission after salvage therapy and/or over age 60 in first remission were enrolled in this study. They were randomly assigned to treatment with tipifarnib or observation (control). The primary objective was to compare the disease-free survival (DFS) between the two arms based on intention to treat, which includes all randomized patients., Results: One hundred and forty-four patients were enrolled on the study. Median DFS was 8.9 vs 5.3 months, for tipifarnib vs observation (one-sided p = 0.026) and did not cross the pre-specified boundary to call the study positive. For the 134 eligible patients, median DFS was 10.8 vs 5.3 months for those randomized to tipifarnib vs observation (one-sided p = 0.008). Moreover in an ad hoc evaluation of all women (n = 71) median DFS was 12.1 vs 3.9 months for tipifarnib vs observation (one-sided p = 0.0004) while median OS was 26.5 vs 8.4 months respectively (one-sided p = 0.001)., Conclusion: This study was not able to demonstrate a benefit to tipifarnib as maintenance therapy in patients with AML in remission. While subsets of patients may indeed benefit, additional studies would be needed to elucidate that benefit which is unlikely given that other seemingly better options have since become available., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF