151. Door in - door out assessment of patients admitted with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in hospitals without catheterization facilities.
- Author
-
Clot S, Rocher T, Morvan C, Rubio C, Sainvoirin S, Usseglio P, Belle L, Descotes-Genon V, and Vanzetto G
- Subjects
- France, Guideline Adherence, Health Services Accessibility statistics & numerical data, Humans, Registries, Time and Motion Studies, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary statistics & numerical data, Emergency Service, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Patient Admission statistics & numerical data, Patient Transfer statistics & numerical data, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnosis, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction epidemiology
- Abstract
Background: Many patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are admitted to emergency departments (EDs) of centres without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) facilities. The 2012 European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend transfer to a PCI centre with a "door in - door out" (DI-DO) time≤30min., Purpose: To report DI-DO times in a registry of patients with acute STEMI., Methods: The RESeau des Urgences CORonarienne (RESUCOR) is a permanent registry of patients admitted with acute STEMI in 16 hospitals in the north French Alps since 2002. In patients admitted to a non-PCI centre, the DI-DO times were split into "diagnostic time" (from admission to transfer decision) and "logistical time" (from transfer decision to discharge)., Results: Of 2081 patients included in the registry from 2012 to 2014, 493 were admitted directly into an ED (254 PCI centre and 239 non-PCI centre). Of those admitted into an ED of a non-PCI centre, 228 were immediately transferred to a PCI centre (76 treated with thrombolysis and 132 with primary PCI). The proportions of patients with DI-DO≤30min and median (interquartile range [IQR]) DI-DO times are reported in the Table 1. Median (IQR) DIDO times were 90.5 (69-118) min for patients treated with thrombolysis and 88 (62-147) min for primary PCI., Conclusions: DI-DO times were longer than recommended. Efforts to decrease these delays are required. Transfer with a non-PCI centre ambulance is preferable., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier SAS.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF