Search

Summary The optimal management of relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is not standardized. The Groupe Ouest Est des Leucet aAutres Maladies du Sang developed a combination of vinorelbine, ifosfa- mide, mitoxantrone and prednisone (NIMP) for the treatment of relapsed DLBCL, and assessed its efficacy and safety in association with rituximab (R). This multicentric phase II study included 50 patients with DLBCL in first relapse, aged 18-75 years. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m² day 1, ifosfamide 1000 mg/m² days 1-5, vinorelbine 25 mg/m² days 1 and 15, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m² day 1, and prednisone 1 mg/kg days 1-5, every 28 days for three cycles. Responding patients underwent autologous trans- plantation or received three additional R-NIMP cycles. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 49 for response. Centralized pathology review confirmed DLBCL in all cases. Toxicities were mainly haematological with infectious events needing hospitalization in nine cases. Two toxic deaths were observed. After three cycles, 22 patients (44%) achieved complete response/unconfirmed complete response, 11 achieved partial response (24%), 2 had stable disease and 13 progressed. The non-germinal centre B immunophenotype was associated with shorter progression-free survival. in conclusion, the R-NIMP regimen displayed significant activity in relapsed DLBCL, with acceptable toxicity and should be considered a candidate for combination with new agents.

International audience; Primary nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) is a rare disease. There is no current consensus on how to treat it. The bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen is effective for the treatment of follicular and other indolent lymphomas, but its efficacy in NMZL is not known. We analyzed the outcome of 14 patients diagnosed with NMZL (median age 67 years) who were treated with 375 mg/m2 of rituximab on day 1 and 90 mg/m2 of bendamustine on days 1 and 2. The overall and complete response rates were 93% and 71%, respectively. Major toxicity (grade 3/4 neutropenia) occurred in 5% of treatment courses. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 18-55), the overall survival and the free survival rates were 100% and 93%, respectively. None of the patients showing a complete or partial response developed secondary myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia. Bendamustine plus rituximab was found to be an active and well-tolerated regimen leading to the rapid control of disease.

Primary nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) is a rare disease. There is no current consensus on how to treat it. The bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) regimen is effective for the treatment of follicular and other indolent lymphomas, but its efficacy in NMZL is not known. We analyzed the outcome of 14 patients diagnosed with NMZL (median age 67 years) who were treated with 375 mg/m

International audience; After failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), lenalidomide (LEN) yields red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) in 20-30% of lower-risk non-del5q myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Several observations suggest an additive effect of ESA and LEN in this situation. We performed a randomized phase III study in 131 RBC transfusion-dependent (TD, median transfusion requirement six RBC units per 8 weeks) lower-risk ESA-refractory non-del5q MDS. Patients received LEN alone, 10 mg per day, 21 days per 4 weeks (L arm) or LEN (same schedule) + erythropoietin (EPO) beta, 60,000 U per week (LE arm). In an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, erythroid response (HI-E, IWG 2006 criteria) after four treatment cycles (primary end point) was 23.1% (95% CI 13.5-35.2) in the L arm and 39.4% (95% CI 27.6-52.2) in the LE arm (P=0.044), while RBC-TI was reached in 13.8 and 24.2% of the patients in the L and LE arms, respectively (P=0.13). Median response duration was 18.1 and 15.1 months in the L and LE arms, respectively (P=0.47). Side effects were moderate and similar in the two arms. Low baseline serum EPO level and a G polymorphism of CRBN gene predicted HI-E. Combining LEN and EPO significantly improves erythroid response over LEN alone in lower-risk non-del5q MDS patients with anemia resistant to ESA

International audience; Patients aged 80 or over with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) often have comorbidities that increase drug toxicity and prevent the use of otherwise optimal treatment. We performed a retrospective analysis of 43 patients aged 80 or over (median age: 83; range: 80–93) unable to receive treatment with anthracyclines, at diagnosis of DLBCL, treated with an R-CVP treatment (standard R-CHOP without doxorubicin). The patients had one or more comorbidities: 18 patients (41.9 %) had a performance status (PS) of 3; 23 patients (53.5 %) had low creatinine clearance; 12 patients (27.9 %) had low left ventricular ejection fraction; seven patients (16.3 %) had poor hepatic function; and 26 patients (60.5 %) had a Charlson index score ≥4. Thirty patients (70 %) had two or three adverse factors according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index. Twenty-five patients (58.1 %) received eight cycles of R-CVP, but the full eight cycles could not be given to 18 patients (41.9 %). The OR rate was 58.1 % (CR 37.2 %). There were 34 deaths (79 %) during treatment and follow-up. Ten patients (23.3 %) died early from toxicity before interim evaluation; all had PS 3. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 52.6 months. The overall 2-year survival rate was 31.9 % and the median OS was 12.6 months. The median OS for patients who completed the entire treatment was 26.4 months. The median PFS was 11.2 months. In multivariate analyses, OS was only affected by performance status ≥2 and Charlson index score ≥4. The R-CVP regimen can be active in elderly frail patients aged 80 or more with DLBCL, but systematic geriatric assessment is required so that those unsuitable for chemotherapy are excluded.

International audience; Elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are underrepresented in trials evaluating fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). We assessed four cycles of FCR with two additional rituximab doses on day 14 of cycles 1 and 2 in 194 untreated CLL patients \textgreater 65 years (median age 71.2) without del17p. Four FCR cycles were administered to 90.7% (176/194), with (n = 74) or without (n = 102) dose-delay and/or dose-reduction. A total of 50% grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred after each cycle. Only 6.2% cycles were associated with severe infection. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 19.7%, and partial remission (PR) in 73.9% of patients. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was negative in 36.7%. Overall survival at 36 months was estimated at 87.4%. Oral FC and dose-dense rituximab is feasible and active in fit elderly CLL patients. However, myelosuppression is significant and frequent dose adaptations are required implying that these results cannot be generalized to unfit or frail elderly CLL

In this proof-of-concept, open-label, phase 2 study, patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) received elotuzumab with bortezomib and dexamethasone (EBd) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (Bd) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary/exploratory endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Two-sided 0.30 significance level was specified (80% power, 103 events) to detect hazard ratio (HR) of 0.69. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on all randomized patients and all treated patients, respectively. Of 152 randomized patients (77 EBd, 75 Bd), 150 were treated (75 EBd, 75 Bd). PFS was greater with EBd vs Bd (HR, 0.72; 70% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.88; stratified log-rank P = .09); median PFS was longer with EBd (9.7 months) vs Bd (6.9 months). In an updated analysis, EBd-treated patients homozygous for the high-affinity FcγRIIIa allele had median PFS of 22.3 months vs 9.8 months in EBd-treated patients homozygous for the low-affinity allele. ORR was 66% (EBd) vs 63% (Bd). Very good partial response or better occurred in 36% of patients (EBd) vs 27% (Bd). Early OS results, based on 40 deaths, revealed an HR of 0.61 (70% CI, 0.43-0.85). To date, 60 deaths have occurred (28 EBd, 32 Bd). No additional clinically significant adverse events occurred with EBd vs Bd. Grade 1/2 infusion reaction rate was low (5% EBd) and mitigated with premedication. In patients with RRMM, elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory antibody, appears to provide clinical benefit without added clinically significant toxicity when combined with Bd vs Bd alone. Registered to ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01478048.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (LPDC) is a rare and aggressive leukemia entity with cutaneous and extracutaneous involvement, reaching most often lymph, blood and bone marrow. Two cases of LPDC diagnosed in Hospital Center of Le Mans are reported, a 78 year old woman (case 1) and a 82 year old man (case 2), and have been clinically, biologically and histologically documented. The clinical presentation, diagnostic difficulties are reminded, as well as the pathogenesis and therapeutic aspect.

TPS7567 Background: Patients (pts) with R/R CLL who discontinue treatment with the BTKi ibrutinib due to progression have a particularly dismal prognosis. A phase I study showed that the Fc-enhanced, humanized, CD19 antibody MOR208 was well tolerated with encouraging single-agent activity in pts with R/R CLL/SLL. In preclinical models, MOR208 showed synergy with idelalisib (an inhibitor of PI3K delta) and venetoclax (an inhibitor of BCL-2), both approved for the treatment of CLL. Methods: This two-cohort, phase II study will investigate MOR208 combined with idelalisib (cohort A) or venetoclax (cohort B) in pts with R/R CLL or R/R SLL and includes a safety run-in phase for each cohort, to be evaluated by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee. Key inclusion criteria: aged ≥18 years, R/R CLL/SLL while receiving a BTKi therapy or intolerance of such therapy, BTKi administered as a single-agent or in combination for at least 1 month as the most recent prior anticancer therapy, ECOG performance status of 0–2, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria: transformed CLL/SLL or Richter’s syndrome, BTKi treatment within 5 days prior to study drug dosing, prior treatment with a CD19-targeted therapy, a PI3K inhibitor (cohort A) or a BCL-2 inhibitor (cohort B). Pts will be treated for a maximum of 24 (28-day) cycles or until disease progression. Treatment will be MOR208 12 mg/kg IV (weekly for the first 3 months, every second week for the next 3 months, and monthly thereafter) in combination with oral idelalisib 150 mg twice-daily or venetoclax administered on a weekly ramp-up dosing schedule to the recommended daily dose of 400 mg. Primary endpoint: overall response rate based on independent review; secondary and exploratory endpoints include: progression-free and overall survival, duration of response, safety, pharmacokinetics, MOR208 immunogenicity, quality of life and minimal residual disease negativity. 120 pts per cohort are planned. Clinical trial information: 2015-002915-14.

TPS7571 Background: Patients ineligible for stem cell transplantation (SCT) or who relapse after SCT, and those who fail to respond to second-line or salvage chemotherapy, represent an unmet medical need for which new therapeutic strategies are required. MOR208 is a novel Fc-enhanced, humanized, monoclonal antibody directed against CD19. Significant single-agent activity of MOR208 in patients with R-R DLBCL (Jurczak et al., J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 [suppl; abstr 7545]) and enhancement of MOR208-mediated cytotoxicity by BEN in preclinical studies, provide a strong rationale to study MOR208 + BEN in patients with R-R DLBCL. Methods: B-MIND is a randomized (1:1), two-arm, multicenter, open-label, adaptive design, phase II/III study of MOR208 + BEN vs RTX + BEN in adult patients with histologically confirmed DLBCL who have relapsed after or are refractory to 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy and who are not candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous SCT. At least 1 prior therapy line must have included a CD20-targeted therapy. Other key inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years; measurable disease; availability of tumor tissue for central pathology review; ECOG 0–2, and adequate major organ systems function. Key exclusion criteria: primary refractory DLBCL; central nervous system involvement, and known double/triple hit DLBCL genetics. The safety of the combination will be assessed in an initial phase II evaluation. Treatment will comprise 6 cycles of MOR208 (12 mg/kg IV) + BEN (90 mg/m2 IV) or RTX 375 mg/m2 IV + BEN. Patients achieving a response after cycle 6 will continue to receive antibody treatment for up to 18 additional cycles. Primary endpoint: progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints include: best overall response, overall survival, safety, quality of life, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics. Enrollment of 330 patients is anticipated in Europe, US and Asia-Pacific countries. Fourteen patients have been randomized to date. Clinical trial information: NCT02763319.

[Figure][1] An 82-year-old woman presented with left-hip pain. Radiographs revealed multiple bone lesions in the skull and left acetabulum. Laboratory tests showed a peak of monoclonal immunoglobulin D (IgD) κ at 5.1 g/L; albumin, 23 g/L; and hemoglobin, 9 g/dL. Other parameters were normal

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare hematologic malignancy which was first included as an independent cutaneous lymphoma in the 2008 World Health Organisation (WHO) classification (1). BPDCN usually has an extremely poor prognosis, with quick relapses after chemotherapy (2; 3). Here, we report two cases of patients diagnosed in 2011 with BPDCN and myelodysplasia, and who were treated for the first time with 5-azacytidine (5-Aza); a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and mainly used in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (Kaminskas E, et al. 2005 Clin Cancer Res, 11, 3604-8). The first case was an 81-year-old man who presented with unusual CD10+, CD56- immunohistochemistry and 45X, -Y abnormality using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. The second case was a 78-year-old woman who manifested monosomy 13 and chromosome instability due to D13S319 locus deletion in 13q14 as determined by FISH. Both patients showed excellent responses of their skin lesions after one cycle of chemotherapy, and their hematological disease was stabilized; however, pulmonary sepsis set in, followed by neutropenia after the fourth and the fifth cycle of treatment, that is, eight and 9 months postdiagnosis, respectively, leading to patient death.

Summary. Limited data are available concerning treatment and outcome of primary lymphoma of the breast (PLB), especially after CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydoxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy. We retrospectively reviewed 20 consecutive cases of localized PLB seen at our institution over a 20 year period. All PLB were of B-cell origin: treatment was CHOP or a CHOP-like regimen in all patients. Sixteen of the 20 patients achieved complete remission (CR) and two achieved partial remission (. 75% tumour regression). Two patients had progressive disease on therapy. With a median follow-up of 54 months, six patients relapsed after 8‐66 months. Two of the relapses involved the central nervous system (CNS) (isolated in one case, associated with other sites of relapse in the other). The two patients who achieved partial remission also had progression in the CNS, 4 and 8 months after the end of CHOP chemotherapy. All four patients have died as a result of their disease 3, 6, 10 and 13 months after CNS relapse. Of the 16 centroblastic diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL), three had CNS disease at relapse. We also observed three (15%) controlateral breast relapses. Thirteen of the initial 20 patients are alive in CR, six patients have died as a result of their lymphoma and one of unrelated disease. In conclusion, we observed a high incidence of CNS relapse in this group of localized extranodal lymphoma, strongly suggesting that CNS prophylaxis should be associated with systemic chemotherapy in localized PLB.

Background: Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have become the reference treatment of higher risk MDS, but the median survival of about 2 years obtained with AZA remains modest, and median survival after HMA failure is only about 6 months (Prébet et al, JCO 2011). Guadecitabine (GDAC, SGI-110) is a novel HMA dinucleotide of Decitabine and deoxyguanosine, administered SC, which results in extended DAC exposure. In a phase I-II study in AML (Issa, Lancet Oncol, 2015) a dose of 60mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days was recommended. We designed a national multicenter phase II study evaluating the efficacy of GDAC in higher-risk MDS patients, refractory or relapsing after AZA (NCT02197676). Methods: Main inclusion criteria were (1) IPSS int-2 or high MDS, or CMML with WBC < 13 G/l and marrow blasts > 10%, or AML with 20-30% marrow blasts (2) Refractory to 6 cycles of AZA or relapsing after response, but without overt progression (i.e., greater than doubling of marrow blasts compared to pre AZA values) (3) Age ≥ 18 years (4) Normal liver and renal functions. Patients received GDAC 60mg/m2/d x5 d every 28 d until progression, death or no response after 6 cycles (extended to 9 cycles after the 20 first pts). Global DNA methylation was assessed at baseline and on d 8, 15, 22 and 28 of cycle 1 in blood, and on d 28 of cycles 1 , 3 and 6 in BM and blood ,using bisulfite-converted DNA followed by pyrosequencing technology measuring 3 representative CpG sites of the LINE-1 promoter region. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed on June 2016, with a median FU of 9.6 months Results: Between Aug 2014 and Jan 2016, 56 pts from 13 centers were enrolled, M/F: 37/19, median age 75 years [IQR, 69-76]. 15 patients had primary resistance after 6 cycles of AZA, and 41 patients had relapsed after a response and a median of 13 AZA cycles [IQR 9.75-23]). 15 pts had IWG 2006 progression between onset of AZA and inclusion. At inclusion, WHO classification was RCMD in 2 pts, CMML in 1 pt, RAEB-1 in 11 pts, RAEB-2 in 31 pts and AML in 11 pts; . IPSS was int-1, int-2 and high in 4 (6%), 27 (50%) and 23 (42%) pts, resp. (2NA), and R-IPSS was low, int., high and very high in 1 (2%), 3 (6%), 13 (26%), and 34 (60.7%) pts resp (5NA). 43 (77%) pts were RBC transfusion-dependent (TD) and ECOG was >1 in 5 (9%) pts. The average baseline LINE-1 methylation level in the 45 pts evaluated was 73% in blood and 72% in BM. One pt died before any treatment, and 55 patients received at least one cycle of GDAC, with a median of 3 cycles [IQR, 2-5.5]. 9 pts responded (8 after 3 cycles) with 1 (3%) CR, 2 (5%) CRp, 5 (14%) marrow CR and 1 HI; ie an ORR of 16% (95%CI, 8-28%). Responses were seen in 4/15 (26.6%) primary refractory, and in 5/41 (12.2%) relapsing patients (p=NS). On average, the maximum LINE-1 demethylation occurred during the first cycle on day 8 in blood (median -11.3%), and on day 28 in BM (median -3.1%). Median duration of response was 9 months including so far 2 responses ≥ 1 year (12 and 18 months). 49 SAE occurred in 44 pts, and were mostly hematological, with myelosupression in 35/56 (63%) of pts 49 patients ended the study, because of progression (n=20), death (n=14), investigator or patient decision (n= 8), toxicities (n= 6) and pt withdrawal (n=1). Median OS from inclusion was 6.7 months (IC95% [5.6-11.8]). 33 pts had died, because of MDS progression in 14 (42%), infection in 13 (39.3%), bleeding in 1 (3%), and other causes in 5 (15%) pts (2 UK, 2 general deterioration, 1 heart attack). No significant prognostic factor of response to GDAC, including age, sex, ECOG, TD, baseline Hb, platelet, ANC, marrow blast %, cytogenetics, IPSS, IPSS-R, type of AZA failure (primary or secondary), LINE1 baseline methylation or demethylation rate was found. OS was significantly shorter in pts with high IPSS (HR=2.1, 95%CI, 1.04-4.20, p=0.04), and with very poor IPSS-R cytogenetics (HR=4.3, 95%CI, 2.0-9.1, p=0.0015), the latter remaining prognostic in multivariate analysis. Using the recent prognostic model for MDS pts having failed HMA (Nazha et al, hematologica 2016), that includes ECOG>1, very poor cytogenetics, age, marrow blasts >20%, TD, platelets Conclusion: Response rates with GDAC, in this population of higher risk MDS, CMML or low blast count AML with failure to AZA (and often with IWG 2006 progression) were modest. Tolerance was similar to that of conventional HMA treatment. Disclosures Beyne-Rauzy: Celgene, Novartis: Honoraria. Park:Novartis: Research Funding. Jueliger:astex: Employment. Bevan:astex: Employment. Ades:Celgene, Takeda, Novartis, Astex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fenaux:Celgene, Janssen,Novartis, Astex, Teva: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background: Myelofibrosis (MF) is the less frequent Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). We have included in a nationwide database primary (P), post-polycythemia (PPV) and post-essential thrombocythemia (PET) MF diagnosed in France since 2005. Methods: Inclusion criteria were: diagnostic of MF after 2005; according strictly to WHO (bone marrow biopsy mandatory); informed consent. The registry was launched in Oct. 2013, and 26 hematology centers included patients (pts). Summary statistics were reported, namely median [Interquartile range, IQR] or percentage. Baseline characteristics were compared across IPSS groups using chi-square test or Mann and Whitney test. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared by the log-rank test. Results: At time of analysis (June 2016) a total of 527 pts were included in the registry, complete baseline data were available in 499 (95%), and follow-up (FU) data in 433 (87%). Median [IQR] age and M/F sex ratio were 71 [63-78] years and 315/184 (1.7), respectively (resp). 301 (60%) pts had PMF, 182 (36%) had secondary MF (including 64 PPVMF and 118 PETMF) and 16 had pre-fibrotic MF. Five percent of pts had a familial history of hematologic malignancy, and 22% a history of thrombosis or hemorrhage. Splenomegaly was present in 386 (77%) with a median [IQR] spleen size of 4 cm [1-8] below costal margin, and was symptomatic in 11% of pts. Constitutional symptoms were present in 107 (21%) (weight loss in 56, night sweats in 61, fever in 14), and ECOG score was 0, 1, 2, and 3 in 53%, 36%, 11% and 0.3% of pts, resp. Median [IQR] Hemoglobin, WBC and platelet counts were 109 g/L [94-122], 9.3 G/L [5.7-16.0] and 257 G/L [138-430], resp. Circulating blast cells were present in 41%, LDH was above normal value in 95% of pts, median EPO level was 54 [11 - 57] U/L. Grade of fibrosis (WHO) was 1, 2, and 3 in 2%, 66% and 32% of pts, resp. Karyotype was done in 321 pts, normal in 173 (54%), abnormal with favorable prognostic value in 89 (30%) and unfavorable in 30 (10%) (29 failures). A total of 461 (92%) pts had molecular testing: 60% were JAK2V617F positive, 4% had MPL and 7% had CALR mutations, and 99 (28%) over the 352 pts with triple testing were triple negative. IPSS risk categories were low, int-1, int-2 and high in 68 (14%), 168 (34%), 158 (32%), and 105 (21%) pts, resp. In addition to constitutional symptoms, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of clinical signs across IPSS categories (from low to high risk): symptomatic spleen (p=0.016) -though no difference in spleen size was found (p=0.18)-, early satiety (p=0.013), ECOG score (p= 0.0001), bone pain (p=0.002). Moreover, among biological parameters, there was an increase across IPSS groups in WBC (p=0.029), LDH (p=0.0007), ferritin (p=0.003), circulating CD34+ cells (p=0.020), EPO level (p=0.035). In contrast, a decrease was seen for hemoglobin and platelets (p=0.0001 for both). Lastly, frequency of grade 3 fibrosis increased with IPSS (p=0.043), while no evidence of difference was found regarding abnormal karyotype and mutational pattern. Median FU was 33 months [9-63 months]. Among those 433 pts with FU data, median FU was 38 months [19-68], and 124 (29 %) pts had died at the time of analysis, including 13%, 17%, 31%, and 40% of pts from the Low, Int-1, Int-2, and High risk groups, resp (p= 0.0001, figure 1). In the 450 pts with treatment data, treatments received during FU included cytoreductive drug (41%), Jak-inhibitors (35%), Interferon alpha (18%), IMIDs (4%). Splenectomy was performed in only 14 (3%) pts. Forty percent of pts received packed red blood cells, and 12% platelets transfusions. 49 (11%) patients participated in a clinical trial, and 27 (6%) were allografted. Conclusion: This is the first analysis of the French MF observatory after inclusion of more than 500 pts diagnosed and treated during the past 10 years. Complete baseline data and follow-up information available for the majority of pts should allow for new studies of outcomes and influence of clinical and biological parameters, as well as reassessment of prognostic models in the era of new targeted therapies. Figure 1 Comparison of overall survival according to IPPS Figure 1. Comparison of overall survival according to IPPS Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures Etienne: Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; ARIAD: Speakers Bureau; novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Tavitian:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ugo:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kiladjian:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

e21680Background: Epoetin zeta (Retacrit, Hospira, a Pfizer company) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent that is well tolerated and efficacious in treating patients with chemotherapy-induced ane...

e18066Background: The management of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) is well established, with EU and US guidelines advising their use to reduce red blo...

e21614Background: The management of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) by erythropoiesis-stimulating agents is well established, with EU and US guidelines advising their use to reduce red blood cell...

TPS7572Background: Ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), is an important treatment option for patients (pts) with CLL/SLL. Pts who progress early on ibrutinib are difficult to tre...

Background Induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma less than 66 years old. The quality of response to the induction treatment is an important prognostic factor and is predictive of progression free survival (PFS) following ASCT. The triplet combinations bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) and bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) have demonstrated high response rates in prospective phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials, they are 2 of the most commonly used induction regimens prior to ASCT, and are both recommended in the International guidelines. To date, no comparative data from prospective randomized trials of the safety and efficacy of VTD vs VCD are available. This provided the rationale for the phase 3 investigation of VTD vs VCD prior to ASCT in patients with de novo MM in this randomized multicenter study (NCT01564537). Methods Patients with de novo symptomatic MM less than 66 years old were prospectively randomized to receive either 4 cycles of VTD (arm A) or 4 cycles of VCD (arm B) followed by ASCT. The VTD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, subcutaneously (SC) D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Thalidomide 100 mg/d, PO D1 to D21. The VCD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, SC D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m²/d, PO D1, 8, 15. Patients were stratified according to ISS (1-2 versus 3) and cytogenetics (high-risk defined by 17p deletion and t(4;14) versus other).The primary endpoint was very good partial response (VGPR) rate following 4 cycles. Response was assessed in a central lab according to the IMWG criteria. Assuming a VGPR rate of 60% in the VTD arm versus 45% in the VCD arm (15% difference), the possibility to detect a statistically significant difference required the enrolment of 340 patients overall (170 per arm). Adverse events were graded using the NCI CTCAE catalogue, version 4.0. Results From 11/2013 to 02/2015, 358 patients were enrolled into the study. 18 were screening failures, and 170 were randomized each to arm A (VTD) and arm B (VCD). The median age was 60 years (range, 26-65), 62% of the patients were male, and overall, the patient characteristics were well-balanced across the 2 arms of the study. The median number of induction cycles administered in both arms was 4 (1-4). On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate (> partial response [PR]) was 92.3% in arm A, including a 10.7% complete response (CR) rate and a VGPR rate of 66.7%, while in arm B the overall response rate was 84%, with a 9.5% CR and a 56.2% VGPR rate. VGPR and PR rates were significantly higher in the VTD arm with p-values of 0.04 and 0.02, respectively. Seven patients died during induction therapy (2%), 3 in arm A from infections (2) and pulmonary embolism (1), and 4 in arm B from progression to extramedullary myeloma (2) and infections (2). Grades 3 / 4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 4% and 2.2% in Arm A and B, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 11.9% vs 22.5% in Arm A and B, respectively. Conclusion This trial is the first prospective randomized comparison of 4 cycles of VTD versus 4 cycles of VCD administered as induction therapy prior to ASCT. VTD was shown to be significantly superior to VCD in terms of VGPR and PR rates. Neuropathy rates low in both arms, while neutropenia was more frequent with VCD. Disclosures Moreau: Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. MACRO:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Stoppa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:jansen: Honoraria; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background Recommendations on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) are well established (Schrijvers D et al. Ann Oncol 2010;21[suppl 5]:v244-7). Iron supplementation can further improve treatment response of CIA, particularly in the case of iron deficiency (Pedrazzoli P et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1619-25; Auerbach M et al. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1301-7), but is under-used. Objective To evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa biosimilar, with or without iron, on CIA in current oncology and hematology practice. Methods SYNERGY was an observational, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study conducted in France, from a representative, random sample of oncologists and hematologists. Patients of these clinicians were aged ≥18 years with solid tumors, lymphoma and/or myeloma and CIA, eligible for treatment with epoetin alfa biosimilar and followed for 12-16 weeks. A subanalysis describing the treatment response to epoetin alfa biosimilar in patients with/without iron supplementation and their target hemoglobin (Hb) levels is presented here. Results Overall, 2167 patients were enrolled by 195 French oncologists/hematologists during June 2012-December 2014. The analysis included 2076 patients, of whom half were male. At inclusion, mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 67±12 years and 75.7% (n=1517) of patients had a World Health Organization performance status of 0 or 1. Most patients had not received any blood transfusions (90.0%, n=1867) or ESAs (93.1%, n=1932) in the year before the inclusion visit. A total of 31.6% (n=655) patients received iron supplementation, of whom 58.9% (n=386) received intravenous (IV) iron, 40.5% (n=265) had oral iron and 0.6% (n=4) were prescribed both oral and IV iron. An iron status assessment was more common in patients who were given iron supplementation, while over a third of patients who did not have an iron status were prescribed iron (Table). At follow-up, over 70% of patients had a maximum Hb level above 11 g/dL, regardless of iron status (Table). For patients with and without added iron, the mean change in Hb level was 2.26 g/dL and 2.22 g/dL at maximum during the study and 1.71±1.52 g/dL and 1.59±1.60 g/dL at final visit, respectively. Iron status results were used to define patients as having absolute iron deficiency (coefficient of saturation of transferrin [CST] Conclusions Overall, these results provide real-life evidence that epoetin alfa biosimilar was effective in treating anemia. Iron supplementation improved the response to epoetin alfa biosimilar in patients with an absolute iron deficiency, suggesting that iron status can be used to optimize treatment of patients with CIA with ESAs and iron supplementation. Disclosures Scotté: Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Bertram Glass: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Spaeth:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Kasdaghli:Hospira: Employment. Albrand:Hospira: Employment. Leutenegger:GECEM: Employment; Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Ray-Coquard:PharmaMar: Consultancy, Other: Paid instructor; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Paid instructor; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Paid instructor; Hospira SAS: Research Funding.

Background Recommendations on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) are well established (Schrijvers D et al. Ann Oncol 2010;21[suppl 5]:v244-7). Iron supplementation can further improve treatment response of CIA, particularly in the case of iron deficiency (Pedrazzoli P et al. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1619-25; Auerbach M et al. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1301-7), but is under-used. Objective To evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa biosimilar, with or without iron, on CIA in current oncology and hematology practice. Methods SYNERGY was an observational, longitudinal, prospective, multicenter study conducted in France, from a representative, random sample of oncologists and hematologists. Patients of these clinicians were aged ≥18 years with solid tumors, lymphoma and/or myeloma and CIA, eligible for treatment with epoetin alfa biosimilar and followed for 12-16 weeks. A subanalysis of patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma is presented here. Results Overall, 2167 patients were enrolled by 195 French oncologists and hematologists during June 2012-December 2014. Of these patients, 12.7% (n=264) had lymphoma and 6.6% (n=136) had multiple myeloma and were included in the analysis population, where the disease categories were non-exclusive; 84.5% (n=223) of patients with lymphoma were diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Half of the patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma were male. The majority of patients were ≥70 years old (60.6% of patients with lymphoma and 69.1% with multiple myeloma) and had a performance status of 0 or 1 (72.9% [n=180] of patients with lymphoma and 71.8% [n=94] with multiple myeloma). Baseline mean ± standard deviation (SD) hemoglobin (Hb) levels of patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma were 9.5±0.8 g/dL and 9.5±0.9 g/dL; 40.2% (n=106) and 39.0% (n=53) of these patients had moderate anemia (Hb 8.0-9.5 g/dL), while 2.3% (n=6) and 4.4% (n=6) had severe or very severe anemia (Hb ≤8.0 g/dL), respectively. Iron status assessment was available for 60.2% (n=159) of patients with lymphoma and for 59.6% (n=81) with multiple myeloma. Concomitant iron supplementation was not prescribed with epoetin alfa biosimilar for the majority of patients. A total of 11.4% (n=30) of patients with lymphoma and 6.6% (n=9) of patients with multiple myeloma received iron, of whom 63.3% (n=19) and 77.8% (n=7) were prescribed oral iron formulations, respectively. Patients who reached their target Hb level (increase of ≥1 g/dL since enrollment or an increase of ≥2 g/dL, with no transfusions in the three previous weeks) was 79.1% (n=201) of patients with lymphoma and 84.6% (n=104) of patients with multiple myeloma, higher than the overall analyzed population (74.2%, n=1390). The response rate to epoetin alfa biosimilar (epoetin alfa biosimilar discontinued as Hb > target level, with no transfusions in the three previous weeks) was lower in patients with lymphoma given iron supplementation versus those not given iron; 66.7% (n=20) of the iron supplementation group were responders, compared with 75.4% (n=169) of patients without iron. Response to epoetin alfa biosimilar was similar in patients with multiple myeloma regardless of the iron supplementation status (85.7% [n=6] of patients with iron supplementation and 81.0% [n=94] of patients without). The response to epoetin alfa biosimilar translated into an improvement in patient perception of fatigue (66.7% [n=20] of patients with iron supplementation and 72.5% [n=161] of patients without who had lymphoma; 71.4% [n=5] of patients with iron supplementation and 81.3% [n=91] of patients without who had multiple myeloma). Conclusions These results indicate that epoetin alfa biosimilar was effective in treating patients with CIA and lymphoma/myeloma in France and agrees with previous studies (Michallet M et al. BMC Cancer 2014;14:503). Iron supplementation did not appear to increase the response to epoetin alfa treatment in this population; however, confirmatory studies in larger patient cohorts are required. Disclosures Scotté: Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Gisselbrecht:Hospira SAS: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Baxter: Research Funding; Chugai Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Bertram Glass: Research Funding. Spaeth:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Kasdaghli:Hospira: Employment. Albrand:Hospira: Employment. Leutenegger:GECEM: Employment; Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Ray-Coquard:Hospira SAS: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Paid instructor; PharmaMar: Consultancy, Other: Paid instructor; Roche: Consultancy, Other: Paid instructor.

Introduction: Elotuzumab, an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody, recognizes Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule F7 (SLAMF7), a protein highly expressed on myeloma cells and natural killer cells. Elotuzumab exhibits a dual mechanism of action by directly activating natural killer cells and initiating antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in myeloma cells, with minimal effect on normal tissues. This Phase 2 open-label study (NCT01478048, CA204-009) compared the efficacy and safety of elotuzumab in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone (EBd) vs bortezomib and dexamethasone (Bd) alone in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). EBd demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than Bd (9.7 vs 6.9 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.72; 70% CI 0.59, 0.88; p=0.09). More pts continued on EBd than Bd and early overall survival (OS) data showed increased improvement with EBd.1 Here we report a longer-term follow-up (2 years) on safety and efficacy. Methods: Pts with RRMM and 1-3 prior therapies were given EBd or Bd in 21-day (Cycles 1-8) or 28-day (Cycle 9+) cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Elotuzumab (10 mg/kg IV) was administered weekly for Cycles 1-2, on Days 1 and 11 for Cycles 3-8, then on Days 1 and 15. Bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 IV/SC) was administered on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for Cycles 1-8, then on Days 1, 8, and 15. Dexamethasone 20 mg was administered on non-elotuzumab days, and at 8 mg PO + 8 mg IV on elotuzumab days. The primary endpoint was PFS (ITT population) according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria. The study had 80% power to detect a HR of 0.69 with 103 events. In this proof-of-concept study, a 2-sided 0.30 significance level was specified to test for PFS difference between arms; p≤0.3 was considered significant. Results: 152 pts with RRMM (median age 66 years) were randomized (77 to EBd and 75 to Bd). Median time since diagnosis was 45 and 44 months in the EBd and Bd arms, respectively. The proportion of pts with prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) use was 51% in the EBd arm and 53% in the Bd arm. At data cut-off (April 16, 2015), 12% and 3% of pts treated with EBd and Bd, respectively, remained on therapy; discontinuation was mainly due to disease progression (56% across treatment arms). Median number of treatment cycles was 12 in the EBd arm and 7 in the Bd arm. HR for PFS was 0.75 (70% CI 0.62, 0.90). 2-year PFS rate (95% CI) was 18% (10%, 28%) and 10% (4%, 18%) for the EBd arm and Bd arm, respectively. Adjusting for prognostic factors, PFS HR (EBd vs Bd) was 0.60 (70% CI 0.48, 0.74; p=0.0116). The median PFS in the EBd arm was 9.9 months vs 6.8 months in the Bd arm. Overall response rate was 65% in the EBd arm vs 63% in the Bd arm. Fifty-four deaths occurred (26 in EBd arm, 28 in Bd arm), mainly due to multiple myeloma. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 53 (71%) and 45 (60%) pts in the EBd and Bd arms, respectively. AEs ≥ Grade 3 in ≥15% of pts were thrombocytopenia (7 [9%] in EBd arm; 13 [17%] in Bd arm) and infections (17 [23%] in EBd arm; 11 [15%] in Bd arm). Infusion reactions (all Grade 1-2) occurred in 5% of EBd-treated pts. Updated efficacy and safety data including 2-year OS data will be presented. Conclusions: This is the first randomized controlled trial of elotuzumab in combination with a PI. Elotuzumab in combination with Bd shows an improvement in PFS, supported by early OS data.1 This longer-term follow-up demonstrates prolonged PFS with elotuzumab plus Bd, and a safety profile consistent over time, with minimal incremental toxicity, compared with Bd alone. Longer-term data on PFS and OS will be presented, providing insight into the durability of response with EBd vs Bd. Reference: 1. Jakubowiak A et al. Haematologica 2015;100(s1):2 Study funding: Study funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and AbbVie Biotherapeutics. Writing assistance was provided by Sarah Addison, PhD, at Caudex and funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Disclosures Palumbo: Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Honoraria; Array BioPharma: Honoraria; Sanofi-Aventis: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria. Off Label Use: Elotuzumab is an investigational agent being studied for the treatment of multiple myeloma.. Offidani:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Bosi:Celgene: Other: Travel expenses; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel expenses; Teva: Research Funding; Italfarmaco: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Consultancy; Mundipharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria; Binding Site: Other: Travel expenses. Marasca:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: travel grant; Gilead: Honoraria. Laubach:Novartis: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Singhal:Abbvie: Employment. Lynch:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Jou:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Jakubowiak:Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: institutional funding for support of clinical trial conduct, Speakers Bureau; SkylineDx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Hydroxyurea is the standard therapy of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) presenting with advanced myeloproliferative and/or myelodysplastic features. Response to hypomethylating agents has been reported in heterogeneous series of CMML. We conducted a phase 2 trial of decitabine (DAC) in 39 patients with advanced CMML defined according to a previous trial. Median number of DAC cycles was 10 (range, 1-24). Overall response rate was 38% with 4 complete responses (10%), 8 marrow responses (21%), and 3 stable diseases with hematologic improvement (8%). Eighteen patients (46%) demonstrated stable disease without hematologic improvement, and 6 (15%) progressed to acute leukemia. With a median follow-up of 23 months, overall survival was 48% at 2 years. Mutations in ASXL1, TET2, AML1, NRAS, KRAS, CBL, FLT3, and janus kinase 2 (JAK2) genes, and hypermethylation of the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene TIF1γ, did not predict response or survival on DAC therapy. Lower CJUN and CMYB gene expression levels independently predicted improved overall survival. This trial confirmed DAC efficacy in approximately 40% of CMML patients with advanced myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic features and suggested that CJUN and CMYB expression could be potential biomarkers in this setting. This trial is registered at EudraCT (eudract.ema.europa.eu) as #2008-000470-21 and www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01098084.

8573 Background: Elo, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule F7 (SLAMF7), kills myeloma cells with minimal effects on normal tissue. Elo showed enhanced act...

e20523 Background: Many elderly patients with DLBCL cannot tolerate R-CHOP. The objective of this randomized phase II trial was to assess in frail older patients efficacy of two regimens, R-COP (st...

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare acquired disease, associated with hemolytic anemia and bone marrow failure. The cellular abnormality is a mutation in the phosphatidylinositol glycan class (PIG A) resulting in a deficiency of glycosylphosphadityl-inositol (GPI)-anchored complement regulatory proteins, including CD 55 and CD59, on the surface of blood cells. Case report We report the case of a French, 81 year-old-man, who was admitted to our institution with an unusual clinical presentation. He had a rheumatologic monitoring in the context of polyarthritis associated with anemia (98g/L). No hemolytic events were noticed and there was no notion of either transfusion. Biological results showed hemolytic regenerative anemia (98g/L) with 136G/L of reticulocytes, neutrophil polynuclears (4.2G/L) without degranulation and nevertheless rare degranulation cells, no blasts, normal level of platelets (258G/l), increase of LDH (Nx3), low haptoglobin (0.07g/L), negative direct Coombs test. The cytology aspect of medullar cells associated dysgranulopoiesis with degranulation of myeloid lineage and abnormal chromatin condensation, dyserythropoiesis, dysmegacaryopoiesis, in favor of a multilineage dysplasia without blasts. The marrow karyotype was normal. Due to the morphological results observed on the blood smear and their dissociation with the medullary cytology, flow cytometry (FC500) for GPI‘s expression study was performed. The used antisera were: CD55, CD59, CD14, CD16, CD24, CD66b, CD157, no FLEAR was tested. Results TableBloodBone marrowMononuclear cells CD14 FL378% intermediar cells70% negative cellsNeutrophil cells CD16 PE56% intermediar cells56% negative cellsNeutrophil cells CD66b FITC57% negative cells70% negative cellsGranular cells CD24 PE49% negative cells62% negative cellsRed cells CD55 FITC10% negative cells11% negative cellsRed cells CD59 FITC12% negative cells12% negative cells Figure 1 Blood Figure 1. Blood Figure 2 Bone Marrow Figure 2. Bone Marrow The confirmation was obtained by using CD157PE antisera on bone marrow with 70% negative mononuclear and granular cells. The results confirmed the PNH clone’s presence in the blood and also in bone marrow, and the results of flow cytometry could explain the cytological aspect of neutrophil polynuclear cells. It is rare to explore the expression of GPI molecules in bone marrow and there is no publication about the PNH clone whose identification required bone marrow cells for the confirmation of abnormalities in blood. Thus, the apoptosis in the bone marrow of the defective myeloid cells would explain the difference of granularity of polynuclear cells between bone marrow and blood smear. Conclusion The significance of this observation is related to the search of a PNH clone when cytological dissociation is observed between the peripheral blood and bone marrow, associated with biological hemolysis arguments (increased LDH and decreased haptoglobin). It is well known that 6 at 8% of myelodysplasia had PNH clone; the originality of this case report is the initial clinical signs and the laboratory proof of PNH in the blood and the bone marrow. This observation was submitted at the national reference center of PNH in France (St Louis Hospital - Hematology Department - Professor SOCIE) and the treatment by eculizumab was introduced. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Therapeutic guidelines in essential thrombocytemia (ET) are based on established criteria, ie. age more than 60 years, history of thrombosis, platelets more than 1000-1500 ×109/L and to lesser degree cardio-vascular risk factors. Hydroxyurea and anagrelide are the most commonly used cytoreductive therapy for high risk ET. Despite a proven activity in Ph negative myeloproliferative disorders, generalized use and efficacy of Interferon-alpha (IFN-α) have been hampered by frequent side effects. Nonetheless it is a non leukemogenic therapeutic option for younger patients (pts) and during pregnancy. Two phase II trials using Pegylated (Peg) forms of IFN-α in pts with polycythemia vera (PV) or high risk ET have provided interesting results: i) an improved toxicity profile generally associated with a rapid hematolologic response, ii) a molecular response described in a subset of JAK2V617F positive PV or ET pts treated with PegIFN-α. Aim: To estimate the rationale of PegIFN-α therapy selection in high risk ET patients, efficacy and tolerance. Methods:Cases of high risk ET patients, who started PegIFN-α therapy between 2006 and 2011, were reported by centres of the French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative disorders and included in an observational study. We collected information regarding history of MPN, treatment, hematologic response at different timepoints, toxicities related to PegIFN-α, thrombo-hemorrhagic events and hematologic progression. The current analysis was performed on 103 consecutive pts. Results: Median follow-up from ET diagnosis was 9 years (3-27). 74% of pts were female, median age was 37 years (range 16-67). Previous vascular event was observed in 36% of cases and JAK2V617F mutation was detected in 52% of pts. . Median time from diagnosis to PegIFN-α was 40 months (1-255). PegIFN-α was administered after hydroxyurea and anagrelide in second or third line (56% and 27% respectively). No prior therapy has been used for 16% of pts. Reasons for starting PegIFN-α were lack of hematologic response (21%), toxicity to prior therapies (17%), pregnancy (15%), or medical decision for younger pts (47%). Pts received either PegIFNα-2a (n=91) or PegIFNα-2b (n=12), based on physician decision. According to the 2009 European LeukemiaNet criteria and with a median exposure to PegIFN-α of 29 months (1-92), 81% of pts achieved a complete hematologic response (CHR). Cumulative incidence of CHR were 58 % (95% CI: 49-68), 73% (95% CI: 65-81) and 80% (95% CI: 71-87) at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. By analysing the response according to JAK2 status, cumulative incidence of CHR was better for the JAK2V617F positive subgroup (p=0.0183, overall). At 36 months estimated CHR rates were 89% (95% CI: 79-95) and 70% (95% CI: 57-82) for JAK2VF positive vs negative subgroup respectively. Median exposure to PegIFN-α was 29 months in both groups. At last follow-up, with a median of 42 months since PegIFN-α initiation, 53% of the pts were still treated with PegIFN-α. Among them, 76% have maintained a CHR. Reasons for discontinuation of PegIFN-α (47% of pts) were consecutive to PegIFN-α toxicity (59%), -mainly chronic moderate non hematologic toxicity-, or hematologic responses were considered insufficient in16%. In addition, PegIFN-α has been stopped in a subset of pts who achieved a durable stable CHR. In Conclusion, This study provides results of PegIFN-α therapy in a cohort of high risk ET pts not included in clinical trials. In this selected population of young pts, a durable efficacy of therapy was observed in half of patients. Characteristics of hematologic response according to molecular status will be presented. These results support the PegIFN-α as an alternative therapy to hydroxyurea and anagrelide in high risk ET, and warrant its investigation in further prospective randomized studies. Disclosures Roy: Merck: Peg-Interferon provided for academic clinical trial in CML Other. Off Label Use: Peg-Interferon in essential thrombocythemia. Gyan:Roche: Research Funding. Nicolini:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:Roche: Peg-Interferon provided for academic clinical trial in PV Other.

7002 Background: ESAs, the first line treatments of anemia in non del 5q lower risk MDS, yield only 40-50% responses. LEN gives RBC transfusion independence (TI) in about 25% of ESA resistant (or relapsing) TD lower risk MDS without del 5q (Raza, Blood, 2008), and a gene expression signature can predict response (Ebert, Plos Med 2008). We randomized in this patient population LEN alone and LEN+EPO. Methods: In this prospective multicenter open-label phase II study (NCT01718379), lower risk MDS patients without del 5q, with TD (≥4 RBC units during the previous 8 weeks (w)) with ESA resistance or relapse after a response were randomized between LEN alone, 10mg/d x 21 d/4 w (L arm) or LEN (same schedule) + EPO beta, 60 000 U/w (LE arm). The primary endpoint was erythroid response (HI-E, IWG 2006 criteria) after 4 treatment cycles. Secondary objectives included identification of biomarkers of response. Results: Between July 2010 and June 2012, 132 patients (pts, 66 / arm), median age 73 (range 46-88), M/F: 88/44 were enrolled. Median TD was 6 RBC units/8w (range 2-18). IPSS was Low in 45% and Int-1 in 55% pts. Pretreatment characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. All but 3 pts, who withdrew consent (2L+1LE), were evaluable for response. In this ITT population, HI-E was obtained in 15 pts (23.4%) in L arm and 26 (40.0%) in LE arm (RR= 1.7, p= 0.043, chi2 test), and TI in 9 (14.1%) versus 16 (24.6%) pts (RR=1.7, p= 0.13). In the 99 pts who completed 4 treatment cycles, 41 achieved HI-E, including 15/49 (30.6%) in L arm versus 26/50 (52.0%) in LE arm (p= 0.03), and TI in 9 (18.4%) versus 16 (32.0%) pts (RR= 1.7, p=0.12). Side effects (cytopenias and 1 DVT/arm) were similar in the 2 arms. A 29-gene expression profile signature predicting HI-E to L or LE, different from that previously published, was identified and a polymorphism in the CRBN gene (Kosmider, submitted) was significantly associated with HI-E in the entire cohort (p=0.034). Conclusions: LEN + EPO yielded a significantly better erythroid response than LEN alone in lower risk MDS patients with anemia resistant to ESA alone. A gene expression signature and a CRBN gene polymorphism correlated with the erythroid response. Clinical trial information: NCT01718379.

2744 The current standard of care for fit patients (pts) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is rituximab (R) in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide; however, many pts with CLL are elderly and have comorbidities that render them ineligible for fludarabine treatment. Two common treatment options for fludarabine-ineligible pts are bendamustine (B) or chlorambucil (Clb). A further promising treatment option, following the success of the combination of R with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, might be to combine B or Clb with R. The following study aims to assess the responses of pts to a combination of R and either B or Clb in first-line (1L) or second-line (2L) pts with CLL, with the primary objective being to compare the confirmed complete response (CR) rate (assessed according to Hallek et al. Blood 2008) after 6 cycles of treatment between the two treatment arms for the pooled 1L and 2L pts. Pts (aged ≥ 18 years) who were ineligible for fludarabine treatment, as a result of age or a greater number of comorbidities, were randomized to either the R-B or R-Clb arm. Pts were 1L or 2L, where relapse had occurred no earlier than 12 months since their last dose of 1L treatment. Pts in the R-B arm were treated with six 28-day cycles of B (1L: 90 mg/m2 Days 1 and 2; 2L: 70 mg/m2 Days 1 and 2) with R administered on Day 1 of cycle 1 (375 mg/m2) and cycles 2–6 (500 mg/m2). Pts in the R-Clb arm received the same dose of R but in place of B they received Clb (10 mg/m2Days 1–7, cycles 1–6), and those pts in the R-Clb arm that had not achieved a CR after 6 cycles continued to receive Clb monotherapy for up to 6 further cycles. Tumor assessments were made after cycles 3, 6 and 12 and then 3-monthly for at least a year. Enrollment and randomization are ongoing and, at present, a total of 339 pts have been randomized between the two treatment arms, 126 of whom are included in this interim analysis with the remaining pts continuing on the study. Of these 126 pts, 58 were randomized into the R-B arm and 68 the R-Clb arm. Patient characteristics between the two treatment arms were well balanced (Table). The median age of pts was 74 years (75 years for the R-B arm and 73 years for the R-Clb arm) and the majority of pts were taking concomitant medication (57/58 pts [98%] in the R-B arm; 64/68 pts [94%] in the R-Clb arm). Compared with previous clinical trials in CLL where pts are usually younger and fitter, this patient population is closer in age and fitness to pts presenting in the clinic. A total of 85 pts were previously untreated, with the remaining 41 having received one line of previous treatment. 2L pts had received a median of 6 prior cycles of treatment. The safety population was made up of 124 pts (R-B: n = 57; R-Clb: n = 67) who had received at least one dose of the study medication; 104/124 pts completed all 6 cycles of rituximab treatment. After 6 cycles of treatment, 14/58 pts (24%) in the R-B arm had a confirmed CR compared with 7/68 pts (10%) in the R-Clb arm (p = 0.033). For 1L pts the corresponding CR rates were 30% in the R-B arm vs 13% in the R-Clb arm (p = 0.054) and 2L pts exhibited CR rates of 11% in the R-B arm vs 4% in the R-Clb arm (p = 0.413). At the end of treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) was not different between the R-B and the R-Clb arms (88% and 81%, respectively [p = 0.404]). ORRs for 1L pts were 88% in the R-B arm vs 80% in the R-Clb arm and for 2L pts were 89% in the R-B arm vs 83% in the R-Clb arm. Safety was similar between the two treatment arms with the most common adverse events (AEs) (any grade) being neutropenia (R-B: 42% vs R-Clb: 46%) followed by nausea (R-B: 26% vs R-Clb: 22%). The most common AE at ≥ grade 3 was neutropenia (R-B: 32% vs R-Clb: 34%). Serious AEs were experienced by 20 pts (35%) in the R-B arm and 23 pts (34%) in the R-Clb arm; the most frequent serious AE was pneumonia (R-B: 7% vs R-Clb: 2%). 5/57 pts (9%) in the R-B arm and 8/67 pts (12%) in the R-Clb arm withdrew from the study prematurely due to AEs. R-B or R-Clb could provide useful treatment options for pts with CLL who are ineligible for the current fludarabine-containing standard of care. Interim results from this study have indicated that R-B shows a trend towards higher CR rates compared with R-Clb. | Characteristic | R-bendamustine (n = 58) | R-chlorambucil (n = 68) | |:-------------------------:| ----------------------- | ----------------------- | | Median age, years (range) | 75 (49–87) | 73 (44–91) | | Sex, % | - | - | | Male | 60 | 65 | | Female | 40 | 35 | | Binet stage, % | - | - | | A | 5 | | | B | 55 | 59 | | C | 33 | 37 | | Not reported | 7 | 4 | | 17p/11q del, % | 12 | 4 | | IGVH status, % | - | - | | Mutated | 41 | 52 | | Unmutated | 53 | 38 | | Other | 5 | 10 | | Line of treatment, % | - | - | | 1L | 69 | 66 | | 2L | 31 | 34 | Table: Baseline patient characteristics Disclosures: Leblond: Roche: Advisory Board Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mundipharma: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Rituximab in Combination with Bendamustine or Chlorambucil for Treating Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Rassam: Johnson and Johnson: Unrestricted research grant Other; ROCHE: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Raposo: Roche: Consultancy. Oertel: Roche: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Abstract 434 Introduction: The German CLL8 trial has demonstrated that addition of R to FC improves quality and durability of response in CLL (Hallek et al, 2010), which has led to the recommendation of FCR as first line therapy for fit patients. Although elderly patients were included in the CLL8 trial (up to 81 y-old), the median age of the cohort was 61 y, thus at least 10 y younger than median age at CLL diagnosis. The elderly population is underrepresented in clinical trials and it is still not clear how FCR should be applied in this subgroup. In December 2007, the French intergroup launched the LLC 2007 SA trial (NCT00645606) in which CLL patients aged > 65 y receive an induction with abbreviated FCR followed by randomization between observation or maintenance with rituximab. We now report the safety and efficacy of the induction part in the first 200 patients enrolled in this study. Patients and methods: Stage B or C previously untreated fit (CIRS ≤ 6, CCR ≥ 60 ml/min, PS ≤ 1) CLL patients aged > 65 y needing treatment (NCI criteria) were included. Patients with del17p and/or Matutes scoring < 4 were excluded. From these 200 first patients included, 6 were removed because of incorrect inclusion (n=4) or consent withdrawal (n=2). In total, 194 patients (included between Dec/07 and Feb/10) were analyzed. FCR consisted of four monthly cycles of oral FC (F 40 mg/msq/d and C 250 mg/msq/d, × 3d) and iv R (375 mg/msq d1 cycle 1, 500 mg/msq d14 cycle 1, d1 and 14 of cycle 2, and d1 of cycles 3 and 4). Response was assessed by NCI criteria. MRD analysis was done using 6-color FCM in PB and BM. No later than 90 d after the last FCR, patients were further randomized as per protocol. Disease outcome after randomization remains completely blinded to date. Results: The median age was 71 y (range 65–85) and 65% were males. 83% had CIRS between 0 and 3. Binet stage was B in 127 (65.5%) and C in 67 (34.5%). Median (n=143) Beta-2-microglobulin was 4 mg/L (range 2–8). Fifty-six % had unmutated IgVH and FISH revealed 18% with del11q, 15% with trisomy 12, and 57% with del13q. Karyotype (ODN+IL2-stimulated) was abnormal in 67%. Balanced and unbalanced translocations were seen in 16% and 17%, respectively. Complex (>2 abn) karyotype occurred in 14% of the patients. Toxicity: 167 (86%) received all four cycles of FCR. Only 4.6% and 3.2% of patients did not receive d14 rituximab at cycle 1 and 2, respectively. 158 patients (81%) could proceed to the randomization (the main reason for failure was insufficient marrow recovery). Dose delay (by ≥ 1 w) and dose reduction (by ≥ 25% of F and C) for cycles 2, 3, and 4 were 12% and 7%, 14% and 8%, 15% and 11%, respectively. Neutropenia g3/4 occurred after cycle 1, 2, 3 and 4, in 46% (19% g4), 50% (21% g4), 53% (29% g4), and 46% (26% g4) of the patients. G-CSF was given in 32%, 46%, 48%, and 52% of them after cycles 1, 2, 3, and 4. G4 thrombocytopenia occurred in less than 2% of the cycles. G3/4 anemia was seen in 11%, 7%, 6%, and 3% of the patients after cycle 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. G 3/4 infectious events occurred in 6.2%, 4.8%, 7.6%, and 6.2% of the patients after each of the 4 cycles. Seventy SAE (including 46 febrile neutropenia and/or documented infection) were declared in 53 patients during the induction and the period of recovery prior to randomization. In total, 6.3% of the 732 cycles were followed by febrile neutropenia or infection qualified as SAE. Six deaths (all infections) occurred during induction, corresponding to a 3.1% (6/194) death rate from immediate toxicity. Efficacy: Among 188 evaluable patients, complete responses (CR) were observed in 19.7%, nodular partial response (PR) in 2.7%, and PR in 73.9%, for an ORR of 96.3%, using stringent criteria. According to the updated guidelines of 2008 (Hallek), CR, CRi, and PR rates were 19.7%, 13.3%, and 63.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Four cycles of oral FC combined with 6 doses of R appear feasible in elderly patients with CLL; only 14% cannot receive the 4 courses and only 19% cannot proceed to randomization planned at day 90 post FCR4. Dose reduction and treatment interruption are unusual despite strict stopping criteria. Grade 3/4 neutropenia is frequent but rarely translates into serious infection. The response rate is high, and further analysis of MRD eradication is ongoing and will be presented. In conclusion, this approach could enable the safe administration of FCR to elderly fit CLL patients in first line. Long-term toxicity, occurring after randomization, will be scrutinized. Disclosures: Dartigeas: Roche: Consultancy. Van Den Neste:Roche: Consultancy. Leblond:Mundipharma: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria.

Abstract 2796 Background: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse prognosis is poor, and the optimal salvage treatment is not known. In a previous pilot study, vinorelbine, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone, and prednisone (NIMP) without rituximab has shown a promising efficacy in the setting of relapsed DLBCL. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of rituximab and NIMP in the treatment of DLBCL in first relapse. Methods: This multicentric, single-arm phase II study included patients 18 to 75 years old, with CD20-positive DLBCL in first relapse (defined as having obtained at least a PR of more than 50% to an anthracycline-based front-line regimen) occurring more than 30 days after the last chemotherapy cycle or more than one year after an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first line. Other inclusion criteria were a performance status ≤ 2, absence of CNS involvement, and having signed an informed consent form. Patients with evidence of transformation from indolent lymphoma, primary refractory disease, or positive HIV tests were excluded. Initial and relapse biopsies were centrally reviewed. Patients received intravenous (IV) rituximab 375 mg/m2 D1, ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2 as a continuous infusion from D1 to D5, IV vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 D1 and D15, IV mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 D1, and oral prednisone 1 mg/kg D1 to D5, repeated every 28 days for three cycles. Pegfilgrastim support (6 mg at D7) was recommended. The primary endpoint was CR/CRu after 3 cycles, and was assessed by computed tomography according to the IWG criteria. Mobilization, consolidation or subsequent salvage therapy was decided at the discretion of the investigator. All the monitoring and data management were performed by the GOELAMS clinical research assistants, with a database lock on July 27, 2010. Results: Fifty patients (21[42%] women and 29[58%] men) were included in 18 centers between December 2004 and accrual closure in April 2010. All patients received at least 1 cycle of R-NIMP. Forty-five patients were available for central pathology review, toxicity and response. The central review of all patient samples confirmed DLBCL histology. Median age at study entry was 62.9 years (range: 34.8–75.6). Median time between first diagnosis of DLBCL and relapse was 18.0 months (range: 2.4–208). The following tumor responses were observed: 67.9 % overall response rate with 20 CR/CRu (43.5%), 11 PR (24.4%), 2 SD (4.4%), and 12 (26.7%) progressed under therapy. Toxicity information was available for 109/120 (91 %) of the first 3 cycles of R-NIMP administered. The following toxicities were observed (all grades, ≥ grade 3 for all cycles): anemia (87%, 8%), neutropenia (66%; 46%), thrombopenia (65%, 14%), elevated liver tests (39%, 0%), constipation (25%, 0%), kidney failure (7%, 0%), nausea (14%, 0%), vomiting (6%, 0%), allergic reactions (5%, 0%), and mucositis (5%, 0%). Twenty-nine infectious events (27%) were observed needing hospitalization in 9 cases. Twenty-nine patients received consolidation therapy at the discretion of the investigator. Of the 11 patients who received 3 additional cycles of R-NIMP, 3 remained in CR/CRu, 1 remained in PR, 4 converted from PR to CR/CRu, and 3 progressed. Among the 11 patients who underwent ASCT, 9 were in CR at the end of the procedure, one patient died of toxicity and 1 progressed. For the 12 patients mobilized after a R-NIMP cycle, a median of 1 apheresis (range 1–4) was necessary to harvest a median of 3.85 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. The median time to second progression or relapse (TTP2) was 11.4 months, and the median survival of 55.5 months. On multivariate analysis, the variable associated with a longer TTP2 was the achievement of CR/Cru (RR: 0,12; CI95%: 0.03–0,39; p=0.0006). Within the subgroup of patients having received a consolidation treatment, having received an ASCT was associated with a longer TTP2 (RR: 0.20; CI95%: 0.04–0.98; p=0.047). Time to first relapse or previous rituximab exposure did not affect TTP2 nor OS, whereas relapse-IPI (as a continuous variable, by 1 additional risk factor) was associated with a poor survival (RR: 2.59; CI95%: 1.25–4.45; p=0.008). Conclusions: R-NIMP is a well-tolerated regimen, yields a high complete response rate, and allows for successful mobilization of CD34+ cells. This regimen is a suitable salvage treatment for relapsed DLBCL prior to appropriate consolidation. Further investigation is warranted. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00842595 Disclosures: Off Label Use: Vinorelbine in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (Off-label in France).

Introduction MRI is the imaging gold standard method for the detection of bone marrow involvement in multiple myeloma (MM) (Dimopoulos. J Clin Oncol.2015). MRI of the spine and pelvis can detect approximately 90% of focal lesions in MM and is the procedure of choice to evaluate a painful lesion in myeloma patients, mainly in the axial skeleton. It has also been reported that in patients treated with frontline autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) the number of MRI focal lesions and the presence of diffuse pattern correlate with inferior survival (Walker et al. J Clin Oncol.2007). MRI might also help in the better definition of complete response (CR). However, the high number of false positive results suggests that another imaging method, such as Positron Emission Tomography combined with computed tomography using fluoro-deoxy-glucose (PET-CT), might be of more value in this setting (Zamagni. Clin Cancer Res.2015). The goal of our study was to compare prospectively MRI and PET-CT at 3 different time-points, at diagnosis, after 3 cycles of triplet induction therapy and prior to maintenance therapy in a group of patients enrolled into IFM-DFCI 2009 trial comparing frontline or delayed ASCT. Patients and methods 700 patients with de novo symptomatic MM eligible for high-dose therapy (HDT) have been prospectively randomized in France and Belgium to receive either 8 cycles of bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (VRD) followed by 1-year maintenance with lenalidomide, or 3 cycles of VRD followed by HDT and ASCT plus 2 cycles of VRD consolidation and 1-year lenalidomide maintenance. 134/700 patients were also included in the IMAJEM trial (NCT01309334) aimed at comparing in both arms of the IFM-DFCI 2009 study spine and pelvis MRI and whole-body PET-CT at diagnosis (number of lesions, primary end-point), after 3 cycles of VRD, and prior to maintenance (prognosis impact of imaging normalization, secondary end-point). MRI and PET-CT data were analyzed locally in each of the 15 participating centers, and systematically reviewed blindly by an independent committee consisting of 2 radiologists and 2 nuclear medicine physicians with extensive experience in MM field. Results At diagnosis, MRI was positive in 127/134 (94.7%), and PET-CT in 122/134 (91%) patients, respectively (McNemar test = 0.94, p = 0.33). Following 3 cycles of VRD, MRI remained positive in 93%, and PET-CT in 55% of the patients, respectively. Normalization of MRI after 3 months of induction therapy was not predictive neither for progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.99) nor for overall survival (OS) (p = 0.99). Normalization of PET-CT after 3 months of induction therapy was associated with a significant improvement in PFS (30-month PFS rate: 60% in patients PET-CT positive vs 79% in patients PET-CT negative, p = 0.04), but not OS (30-month OS rate: 82 % in patients PET-CT positive vs 93 % in patients PET-CT negative, p = 0.15). Prior to maintenance therapy, MRI remained positive in 83%, and PET-CT in 21% of the patients, respectively. Normalization of MRI before maintenance was not predictive neither for PFS (p = 0.31) not for OS (p = 0.98). Normalization of PET-CT before maintenance was associated with a significant improvement in both PFS (30-month PFS rate: 54.4% in patients PET-CT positive vs 75.9% in patients PET-CT negative, p = 0.0004, figure 1) and OS (30-month OS rate: 69.9% in patients PET-CT positive vs 94.6% in patients PET-CT negative, p = 0.01, figure 2). Conclusion MRI of the spine and pelvis and whole-body PET-CT are equally effective to detect bone involvement at diagnosis. Few patients achieved normal MRI after 3 cycles of VRD and before maintenance. Normalization of MRI following 3 cycles of VRD and before maintenance has no prognostic value for both PFS and OS. 45% of the patients achieved normal PET-CT following 3 cycles of VRD and 79% of the patients achieved normal PET-CT before maintenance. Normalization of PET-CT following 3 cycles of VRD and before maintenance was associated with a significant improvement for PFS. Normalization of PET-CT before maintenance was a predictor for an improved OS. PET-CT should be incorporated in the follow-up of young patients receiving novel-agent based therapy to predict outcome. Figure 1. PFS according to PET-CT negativity vs PET-CT positivity before maintenance therapy p = 0.0004. Figure 1. PFS according to PET-CT negativity vs PET-CT positivity before maintenance therapy p = 0.0004. Figure 2. OS according to PET-CT negativity vs PET-CT positivity before maintenance therapy p = 0.01. Figure 2. OS according to PET-CT negativity vs PET-CT positivity before maintenance therapy p = 0.01. Disclosures Moreau: Celgene, Janssen, Takeda, Novartis, Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Honoraria. Karlin:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Stoppa:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Hulin:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria. Richardson:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Acetylon: Equity Ownership; Oncopep: Equity Ownership.

Abstract 1873 Background: CMML, now classified among MDS/MPN, is prognostically heterogeneous. We (JCO 1988 6:1417, Blood 1996 88:2480) and others found prognosis in CMML to depend on both “MDS factors” (% marrow blasts, cytopenias, karyotype) and “MPN” factors, ie splenomegaly (SMG), WBC count, extramedullary disease (EMD). Treatment of advanced CMML is difficult. The hypomethylating agents Azacitidine and Decitabine (DAC) have shown efficacy in CMML, but in prognostically heterogeneous cohorts. We conducted a phase II trial of DAC in a well defined cohort of advanced CMML. Methods: To be included, CMML (according to WHO) should have: if WBC5cm below costal margin, (SMG>5cm), EMD, based on our previous prognostic factors. Pts received DAC 20mg/m2/d IV for 5 days every 28 days for at least 3 cycles. Response criteria were based on IWG 2006 for pts with WBC 13 G/L also included evolution of WBC, SMG and EMD (Blood 1996 88:2480). Results: Between Nov 2008 and June 2009, 41 pts were included in 16 centers, of whom 39 completed at least one cycle and were considered evaluable for response (the 2 other pts died from septic shock before and during the first cycle respectively). Median number of cycles was 9 (range 1–17). Median age was 71 years (range 54–88), M/F:30/9. Seventeen pts had CMML 1 and 22 had CMML 2 (including pts with up to 29% marrow blasts). Median WBC count was 29.5G/l (range 4.1–147.3), median blood monocytes 3G/l (range 1.05–95.7), and median BM blasts 10% (1-29). Nine pts had WBC5cm and 8 (20.5%) EMD involving skin (n=5) and lymph nodes (n=3). Overall Response Rate (ORR,) was 38.6% with 4 (10.3%) CR, 8 (20.5%) marrow CR and 3 (7.7%) Stable Disease (SD) with HI. 1 CR pt received allo SCT. 18 (46%) pts had SD without HI and 6 (15.4%) pts progressed to AML. 8 (36.4%) of the 22 RBC transfused pts became RBC transfusion independent. 3/10 (30%) pts with plt100G/l. Four pts had cytogenetic response (3 CR and 1 PR) exclusively among pts with +8. Median peripheral monocyte count decreased from 4.8G/l to 0.3G/l after 3 cycles of DAC among responders. SMG disappeared in 6/15 (40%) pts and EMD in 6/8 (75%) pts. 16 pts were receiving Hydroxyurea (HY) at inclusion which could be stopped in 12 of them. With a median follow up of 10 months (1-18), 7 pts had died from progression (n=3), sepsis (n=3) and unrelated cause (n=1). Overall Survival (OS) estimate was 60% at 2 years (median not reached). By comparison, in our previous trial of HY in CMML where inclusion criteria were the same, 2 year survival was 43% (median OS 20 months; Blood 1996 88:2480), for a median follow up of 11 months (range1-43). The only factor associated with response to DAC was WHO subtype, CMML 2 pts showing significantly better ORR (30.8% vs 7.7% in CMML 1; p=0.041).There was no difference in survival between CMML 1 and 2 pts. Treatment with DAC was generally well tolerated with, except for usual grade 3/4 cytopenias, and grade 3 fatigue (n=1). Conclusion: DAC is active in advanced CMML and safe in these elderly pts. A possibly better survival than with HY will have to be confirmed in randomized trials. Correlative genetic studies identifying markers potentially predicting response and survival for DAC are currently underway in our lab. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.