151. Cancer and vitamin D supplementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
John Ford, Fiona Stewart, Alison Avenell, Beatriz Goulao, and Graeme MacLennan
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,MEDLINE ,Medicine (miscellaneous) ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Neoplasms ,medicine ,Vitamin D and neurology ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Vitamin D ,Cancer Death Rate ,Nutrition and Dietetics ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Cancer ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,Meta-analysis ,Dietary Supplements ,business - Abstract
Background: Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D status has been associated with a higher risk of cancer in epidemiologic studies. Objective The aim of this study was to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation alone on cancer incidence and mortality. Design: A systematic review was undertaken. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were searched (last search March 2017) for RCTs investigating vitamin D supplementation alone. RCTs with ≥12 mo of follow-up and in participants with a mean or median age ≥60 y were eligible. During-study events were used as the main analysis, but after-study events were included in a secondary analysis. Subgroup analyses concerning different forms of vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status at baseline, vitamin D dose, and exclusion of open-label trials were undertaken. Results: Thirty studies in 18,808 participants were included in the systematic review, with a median follow-up ranging from 1 to 6.2 y. The results of the meta-analysis for during-study events showed no evidence of an effect of vitamin D supplementation for cancer incidence (RR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.91, 1.15) and cancer-related deaths (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.04). Including after-study events, the RRs were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.13) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.72, 1.00), respectively. These results did not appear to be affected by baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D dose, or the exclusion of open-label trials. Conclusion: We did not find evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation alone reduces the incidence of cancer or cancer mortality, even after including long-term follow-up results.
- Published
- 2017