151. Capability of crop water content for revealing variability of winter wheat grain yield and soil moisture under limited irrigation
- Author
-
Jiali Shang, Chao Zhang, Jiangui Liu, and Huanjie Cai
- Subjects
Canopy ,Irrigation ,Environmental Engineering ,Agricultural Irrigation ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Growing season ,Water ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,01 natural sciences ,Pollution ,Crop ,Soil ,Agronomy ,Soil water ,Partial least squares regression ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Environmental Chemistry ,Environmental science ,Stage (hydrology) ,Edible Grain ,Waste Management and Disposal ,Water content ,Triticum ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a major crop in the Guanzhong Plain, China. Understanding its water status is important for irrigation planning. A few crop water indicators, such as the leaf equivalent water thickness (EWT: g cm-2), leaf water content (LWC: %) and canopy water content (CWC: kg m-2), have been estimated using remote sensing techniques for a wide range of crops, yet their suitability and utility for revealing winter wheat growth and soil moisture status have not been well studied. To bridge this knowledge gap, field-scale irrigation experiments were conducted over two consecutive years (2014 and 2015) to investigate relationships of crop water content with soil moisture and grain yield, and to assess the performance of four spectral process methods for retrieving these three crop water indicators. The result revealed that the water indicators were more sensitive to soil moisture variation before the jointing stage. All three water indicators were significantly correlated with soil moisture during the reviving stage, and the correlations were stronger for leaf water indicators than that of the canopy water indicator at the jointing stage. No correlation was observed after the heading stage. All three water indicators showed good capabilities of revealing grain yield variability in jointing stage, with R2 up to 0.89. CWC had a consistent relationship with grain yield over different growing seasons, but the performances of EWT and LWC were growing-season specific. The partial least squares regression was the most accurate method for estimating LWC (R2=0.72; RMSE=3.6%) and comparable capability for EWT and CWC. Finally, the work highlights the usefulness of crop water indicators to assess crop growth, productivity, and soil water status and demonstrates the potential of various spectral processing methods for retrieving crop water contents from canopy reflectance spectrums.
- Published
- 2017